{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"e8d52144d36e","filters":{"venue":"The Good Society"}},"results":[{"id":"W2141211820","doi":"10.1353/gso.2010.0010","title":"Secularism Minus Exclusion: Developing a Religious-Friendly Idea of Public Reason","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Public reason; Politics; Public sphere; Liberalism; Political science; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Environmental ethics; Law; Religious studies; Social science; Philosophy; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Simone Chambers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0245103945412634,"gpt":0.3179533422980905,"spread":0.2934429477568271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104014,0.0005911238,0.0006915893,0.001967339,0.004239898,0.01116023,0.001769787,0.007426288,0.00284782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00667498,0.0003508847,0.0007382087,0.001642057,0.06863984,0.02433721,0.007486297,0.01196701,0.0005542591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00483389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003675246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001137519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009011543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930922,0.004976235,0.0001335013,0.0005580328,0.000819154,0.0004209155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943297,0.003715024,0.0005256542,0.0006370943,0.0003960524,0.0003964323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003636534,0.000003920704,0.00003347094,0.000005823887,7.726313e-7,0.000005802211,0.0007801689,0.00003564588,0.00001431613,0.9980845,0.000328108,0.0007038408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006866666,0.000009794139,0.00006693986,0.00002912218,0.0000016922,0.00001497231,0.0005060729,0.0002243662,0.00004071569,0.9852021,0.01389287,0.000004596939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0500485,0.01842561,0.131294,0.4282894,0.002768622,0.0001018824,0.0000798485,0.0001293585,0.3688628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546425,0.002881397,0.01516989,0.01359698,0.002469687,0.0001634356,0.00003606452,0.00009842079,0.01094163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01116023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05500853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496009610","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.20.1.0073","title":"Constitutional Artisanship and Institutional Diversity:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Diversity (politics); State (computer science); Library science; Politics; Political science; Search engine optimization; Publishing; Media studies; World Wide Web; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Search engine; Algorithm","authors":[{"name":"Filippo Sabetti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09882504941416737,"gpt":0.2687044713022904,"spread":0.169879421888123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002402801,0.0001674494,0.0003175512,0.001376263,0.004846959,0.00715522,0.0006035529,0.001162103,0.01995952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00704308,0.0001417933,0.000231999,0.003130138,0.009134217,0.004284927,0.006010933,0.001726017,0.0006711672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003718832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003759133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006644086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01214033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977087,0.001082956,0.00006089234,0.0001942684,0.0004570513,0.0004960987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973949,0.001120582,0.0003895507,0.0002404417,0.0002027383,0.0006518323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005672665,0.00007393203,0.01379891,0.0001282305,0.00002270249,0.0001949757,0.01072617,0.0003674891,0.00008197246,0.8716261,0.05999617,0.04292664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005045565,0.000061135,0.07542526,0.001069871,0.00003249842,0.0005604114,0.03897772,0.0004833136,0.0002120526,0.4274848,0.4555968,0.00004567068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1581771,0.04097292,0.001236531,0.1018007,0.0007279203,0.00002601947,0.0004091437,0.00002282584,0.6966268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729995,0.006084729,0.0001678848,0.001256821,0.000490464,0.00001193768,0.00009329904,0.00001562898,0.01887982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01995952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06677121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060070353","doi":"10.1353/gso.2010.0001","title":"Democracy After Secularism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Democracy; Skepticism; Secularization; Entitlement (fair division); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Philosophy; Law; Religious studies; Political science","authors":[{"name":"I. M. Ward","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008068081393096848,"gpt":0.3028471482333685,"spread":0.2947790668402717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003467109,0.00023238,0.0003369616,0.0007362177,0.006638968,0.007839523,0.0004331114,0.002081826,0.01871208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005395887,0.0001636128,0.0003517795,0.0009828419,0.00965415,0.004986576,0.005707625,0.005552054,0.002465982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006375518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005533679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006196801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009173427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961364,0.002068148,0.00006699065,0.0003848904,0.0005228679,0.000820782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997641,0.0006569846,0.0002695645,0.0002973538,0.0004643876,0.0006707524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001675858,0.00001019649,0.0002708269,0.0000215248,0.000002781761,0.00003677373,0.001655804,0.0001285538,0.00004611557,0.9322331,0.0564457,0.009131921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001104601,0.0000212283,0.0007169222,0.0001157456,0.000002902494,0.00004170706,0.001681058,0.000236101,0.0001538931,0.3703941,0.6266146,0.0000107091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02352119,0.01751641,0.003298618,0.3043263,0.006954275,0.00002781463,0.0001243471,0.00007516449,0.6441558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6945727,0.007329848,0.001139884,0.03987456,0.002900113,0.00005604099,0.0001334748,0.0001618795,0.2538314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01871208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06259811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905909896","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.26.2-3.0255","title":"Democracy as Group Discussion and Collective Action: Facts, Values, and Strategies in Canadian and American Rural Landscapes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Collective action; Salient; Democracy; Action (physics); Political science; Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Deliberative democracy; Public administration; Public relations; Politics; Law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Timothy J. Shaffer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01230792997528836,"gpt":0.2759988438583763,"spread":0.2636909138830879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008978977,0.0003942517,0.0004526868,0.003475184,0.06070382,0.01444344,0.00201851,0.002856394,0.004331381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01016986,0.0003482839,0.0002775961,0.005334745,0.05508722,0.004091859,0.009106212,0.003782125,0.0001363771],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1391369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1554691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9761142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909083,0.003747174,0.0001330586,0.000729715,0.001549324,0.002932414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931084,0.003336345,0.0005022071,0.0002473392,0.0008490063,0.001956718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004593263,0.00005739001,0.005769518,0.00009838778,0.000009115672,0.0003106555,0.6729234,0.0003728178,0.0002428977,0.2840233,0.005146952,0.03099964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002649847,0.00003257314,0.01472448,0.0002210989,0.00001828091,0.00008954698,0.7346096,0.0004293146,0.0002694983,0.04540562,0.2041071,0.00006632941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5618219,0.00652959,0.003685793,0.05763785,0.0002985698,0.0001896031,0.0001016758,0.00007917557,0.3696558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885314,0.0008363596,0.0005523405,0.0006548923,0.00001515385,0.00002267245,0.00001492698,0.0000136537,0.009358569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1391369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055686356","doi":"10.1353/gso.2003.0013","title":"The Future of Public Laws for Private Marriages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperbole; Quarter (Canadian coin); Safe haven; Haven; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; History; Philosophy; Metaphor; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Steven L. Nock","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04826127840374358,"gpt":0.2807220098693038,"spread":0.2324607314655603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01192677,0.0002744301,0.0005632835,0.001684837,0.009229257,0.01209603,0.001568605,0.01722738,0.04138833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02607339,0.0004056722,0.0008025698,0.001091787,0.02050735,0.01477189,0.006269605,0.01189866,0.0033797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009787452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02425756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01489619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01777954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926788,0.002792822,0.0001891193,0.0006342213,0.00156914,0.002135987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761455,0.01160671,0.001726603,0.002506557,0.00287787,0.005136738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003004278,0.0001019366,0.0006255467,0.00006994114,0.000004385577,0.00006081774,0.0008029355,0.0001502566,0.00006261972,0.9178576,0.0495987,0.03063525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003658055,0.00005051669,0.002276787,0.0005955637,0.0000112174,0.00009687008,0.001901406,0.0004085631,0.0001654323,0.3885118,0.6059115,0.00003380455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01090704,0.02348783,0.001974599,0.8263648,0.003051101,0.00002386548,0.0001331335,0.0001201049,0.1339375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7067183,0.02822301,0.003011825,0.1759933,0.01349866,0.0002093246,0.0002392081,0.0001491374,0.07195732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04138833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1384578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119094321","doi":"10.1353/gso.2005.0015","title":"Reconsidering the Rule of Law: Reflections on Power, Politics, and Partisan Gerrymandering","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Gerrymandering; Rule of law; Redistricting; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Law and economics; Due process; Public law; Constitutionalism; Politics; Private law; Sociology; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Yasmin Dawood","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1488478529020821,"gpt":0.3417616936482425,"spread":0.1929138407461605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007995162,0.0003543259,0.0005197386,0.00160747,0.01289048,0.01511491,0.001758489,0.007284824,0.002883616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005611617,0.0004877583,0.0005607223,0.001042476,0.053432,0.009995086,0.005224602,0.01107424,0.0003698749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01293525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00444184,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01584686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01962526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920686,0.00406797,0.0001318781,0.0009375483,0.001244186,0.001549887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943098,0.004496284,0.0002604633,0.0003689057,0.0003155218,0.0002490585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003253816,0.000007069645,0.0001051686,0.000005714993,0.000001445605,0.00008041372,0.01046821,0.0001268406,0.00004425225,0.9865161,0.0009944633,0.001647023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009086128,0.00001976113,0.0004400629,0.00008087812,0.000004652155,0.00006621117,0.009912599,0.0006807877,0.0002901784,0.900697,0.08777771,0.00002111106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1757432,0.01811163,0.0215884,0.1623726,0.001426741,0.0000414549,0.0000292842,0.00004200292,0.6206447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765489,0.001431237,0.0009428615,0.008531678,0.0006312027,0.00001843366,0.000005915037,0.00003349234,0.01185626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01584686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09385222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W485916494","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.21.1.0132","title":"<i>Possessive Individualism</i> at 50:","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possessive; Individualism; Marxist philosophy; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Media studies; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Peter Lindsay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03446593544990206,"gpt":0.3117071619864245,"spread":0.2772412265365224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008294058,0.000707191,0.0003278511,0.0008252242,0.01946386,0.01071391,0.0007829712,0.004209653,0.01199214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001828645,0.0003417328,0.0002813798,0.001227641,0.01246363,0.004504472,0.00225799,0.006292269,0.004125768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02435558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008127472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4584137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.701068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988918,0.0002075181,0.00001951865,0.0001885184,0.0002530272,0.0004396054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990927,0.0001470743,0.00007475096,0.00004192349,0.000176829,0.0004666348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004648347,0.00001820663,0.001585394,0.0000721489,0.000006191846,0.0005660756,0.06088604,0.00003900566,0.0003035199,0.3001792,0.6269154,0.009382374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000543088,0.00001404485,0.004638072,0.000134764,0.000005253569,0.000189649,0.01732037,0.00004126463,0.0002707694,0.01049211,0.9668661,0.00002219412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02108399,0.01449378,0.001231899,0.2983756,0.005300351,0.00005993851,0.0005441465,0.0002364051,0.6586739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3000218,0.006223082,0.0004669921,0.07252117,0.001940874,0.0001063533,0.0002209312,0.000223666,0.6182751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4584137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9114909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}