{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"e8d52144d36e","filters":{"venue":"The Good Society"}},"results":[{"id":"W2141211820","doi":"10.1353/gso.2010.0010","title":"Secularism Minus Exclusion: Developing a Religious-Friendly Idea of Public Reason","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Public reason; Politics; Public sphere; Liberalism; Political science; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Environmental ethics; Law; Religious studies; Social science; Philosophy; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Simone Chambers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0245103945412634,"gpt":0.3179533422980905,"spread":0.2934429477568271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001865937,0.000132754,0.0001901055,0.00001774166,0.001404836,0.0001242357,0.0006034452,0.0002926184,0.0001395076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004175703,0.0001024661,0.000476143,0.0005429169,0.0005967946,0.0001959065,0.0001449534,0.0006071767,0.00005056386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001121905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005437664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002848905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001425879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982585,0.0002154216,0.000300439,0.0002201117,0.0005939117,0.0004116513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986285,0.0003018451,0.0002083822,0.0004136745,0.0003092161,0.0001383771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005890311,0.0001200648,0.001523939,0.00002499947,0.0002051975,0.000002628266,0.3211769,0.00000223888,0.006248074,0.3913509,0.2742936,0.005045655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000310919,0.00002756103,0.001321577,0.0000306747,0.00003809062,0.00001035821,0.0796604,0.00007987016,0.0006887618,0.01132344,0.9062537,0.0002546681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8322533,0.0004808162,0.002450196,0.06971587,0.001899233,0.0004731948,0.00001026269,0.000249661,0.09246747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905553,0.001527517,0.003972211,0.001254594,0.0003789815,0.00002300952,0.000005448312,0.00001704707,0.002265908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.63196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496009610","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.20.1.0073","title":"Constitutional Artisanship and Institutional Diversity:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Diversity (politics); State (computer science); Library science; Politics; Political science; Search engine optimization; Publishing; Media studies; World Wide Web; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Search engine; Algorithm","authors":[{"name":"Filippo Sabetti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09882504941416737,"gpt":0.2687044713022904,"spread":0.169879421888123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004495462,0.00006491653,0.00007328172,0.000004711643,0.005394103,0.00002089415,0.0001582745,0.00005383382,0.0001644597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005338818,0.0000481378,0.0000787133,0.0001219722,0.007383649,0.0001406121,0.0002340189,0.0001079315,0.00004427104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005536072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001902069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004601079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007836794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992738,0.00005589937,0.00007579784,0.0001181748,0.000292415,0.0001839188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971,0.00007500275,0.00002982744,0.00005588343,0.00006384053,0.0000655072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004602514,0.00002120664,0.04479519,9.852942e-7,0.00004375497,0.000001199096,0.01964028,5.293138e-7,0.00000386827,0.9336974,0.000949652,0.000841313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005721339,0.00003266954,0.3139743,0.00002804508,0.000120782,0.00001284342,0.03221019,0.00001628193,0.00003276211,0.4263705,0.2262786,0.0003508157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1829028,0.001107338,0.00204301,0.004591728,0.0005324278,0.0002367738,0.00003008018,0.0001193197,0.8084366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980273,0.0003107371,0.0002943618,0.0009356565,0.0002268833,0.000006330215,0.00000144368,9.070052e-7,0.0001964031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8151245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060070353","doi":"10.1353/gso.2010.0001","title":"Democracy After Secularism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Democracy; Skepticism; Secularization; Entitlement (fair division); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Philosophy; Law; Religious studies; Political science","authors":[{"name":"I. M. Ward","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008068081393096848,"gpt":0.3028471482333685,"spread":0.2947790668402717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006715065,0.00007809765,0.00007703655,0.000004820609,0.001353478,0.0001280997,0.000300511,0.0001732936,0.0009353207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007466636,0.00005605682,0.0003793267,0.000175687,0.000405354,0.0001406826,0.00004593986,0.0006104556,0.0003601862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003620634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001119861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001110367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007442833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999096,0.00009317994,0.0001122186,0.0001303794,0.0002956462,0.0002725354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993604,0.0001472786,0.00004635279,0.0002684186,0.000078221,0.00009929483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000818099,0.0001400626,0.006688777,0.000006567318,0.0001707222,0.000002999706,0.3833435,0.000002654819,0.003228452,0.1620674,0.4418809,0.002459756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001295126,0.00000655953,0.005242109,0.000003611955,0.0000260632,0.000002289986,0.02523905,0.00005855156,0.00009746466,0.01525153,0.9538089,0.0001343613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7657754,0.00009218578,0.0003919251,0.07933035,0.002963988,0.0002947183,0.000006106239,0.0002324981,0.1509128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779009,0.0002168327,0.000670469,0.005726727,0.0006380588,0.00002606838,0.000001418161,0.000009872334,0.0148097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.511928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905909896","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.26.2-3.0255","title":"Democracy as Group Discussion and Collective Action: Facts, Values, and Strategies in Canadian and American Rural Landscapes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Collective action; Salient; Democracy; Action (physics); Political science; Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Deliberative democracy; Public administration; Public relations; Politics; Law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Timothy J. Shaffer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01230792997528836,"gpt":0.2759988438583763,"spread":0.2636909138830879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003089357,0.00006072069,0.0001017567,0.00003932108,0.004869066,0.0009177026,0.0001092668,0.00005152862,0.00002279066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004534542,0.00004705038,0.00002522177,0.0000732042,0.001265928,0.0003944364,0.00003382382,0.000131432,0.000001607085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004111427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008726554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994177,0.0000789051,0.00005649626,0.0001182279,0.0001034207,0.0002253151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995803,0.00004399599,0.00006157616,0.00009964306,0.00001434649,0.0002001182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003957773,0.00003504481,0.1969495,0.00004723195,0.0001102866,0.0000144385,0.6895618,0.000002361933,0.0001140162,0.02332511,0.03497455,0.05482609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002388517,0.00003648809,0.6811343,0.00001848649,0.00001861812,0.000003119179,0.2333983,0.00002626935,6.39648e-7,0.01383106,0.0711667,0.0001271207],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698074,0.000363177,8.634181e-7,0.01452848,0.0001145268,0.0001371235,0.000015361,0.00001135585,0.01502166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918345,0.001893419,0.00001699354,0.0001278539,0.00008694408,0.000004521115,0.000001287693,0.00000428863,0.006030236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4841848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055686356","doi":"10.1353/gso.2003.0013","title":"The Future of Public Laws for Private Marriages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperbole; Quarter (Canadian coin); Safe haven; Haven; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; History; Philosophy; Metaphor; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Steven L. Nock","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04826127840374358,"gpt":0.2807220098693038,"spread":0.2324607314655603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001420455,0.00005033077,0.00006506935,0.00000383975,0.001845837,0.00007300693,0.0003668546,0.00009471958,0.00002398596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007433203,0.00002616063,0.000181625,0.0001819513,0.0003878277,0.00006109239,0.00003407498,0.0001239468,0.000006338706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002888102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002795969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003566154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003849073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992703,0.0001351618,0.0001133407,0.00007488812,0.0001926672,0.0002136149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991661,0.0004649775,0.00008492277,0.0001824617,0.0000676053,0.00003388958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[8.232342e-7,0.00002186669,0.001381663,0.000005638918,0.00004852147,2.015987e-8,0.01887738,0.000004738124,0.00003049659,0.9426472,0.03023074,0.006750913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000184588,0.00001658795,0.003845625,0.00000433101,0.00001990516,1.260843e-7,0.03049664,0.002134509,0.000004473605,0.03947388,0.923745,0.00007431188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4094194,0.01690701,0.00272321,0.4377262,0.003840948,0.002533151,0.0001060451,0.0002385722,0.1265054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849197,0.003964718,0.00055877,0.0002467877,0.0005631381,0.00002668622,0.000002261906,0.000008542505,0.009709391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9031733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119094321","doi":"10.1353/gso.2005.0015","title":"Reconsidering the Rule of Law: Reflections on Power, Politics, and Partisan Gerrymandering","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Gerrymandering; Rule of law; Redistricting; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Law and economics; Due process; Public law; Constitutionalism; Politics; Private law; Sociology; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Yasmin Dawood","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1488478529020821,"gpt":0.3417616936482425,"spread":0.1929138407461605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003243673,0.00005174313,0.00007526662,0.000003720936,0.002164989,0.00002658889,0.00008866695,0.00003255191,0.00001022593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004487812,0.0000320017,0.00007297592,0.00007523449,0.00119112,0.00004621203,0.00004423933,0.0001046615,0.00000447489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005461344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007780669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008025055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003670771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994677,0.00003825967,0.00009327498,0.00008113282,0.000151326,0.000168358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996816,0.0001354082,0.00003952489,0.00008089451,0.00003339995,0.0000291605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001057151,0.00001479497,0.000118709,0.000001265167,0.00003567499,1.331163e-7,0.06707464,0.00003374551,0.0001015842,0.9324574,0.00009062242,0.00007035892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003096639,0.00006511935,0.004551327,0.00005917865,0.00004927208,0.000003604631,0.1017972,0.000001966506,0.001058155,0.8296317,0.06231623,0.0001565289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6738499,0.0006964607,0.00007369203,0.03218789,0.0002796891,0.0001707781,0.000006752806,0.00005543133,0.2926793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982358,0.0003220617,0.00006952027,0.001157069,0.0001054665,0.000006833591,1.497345e-7,0.000002763317,0.0001003584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3243858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W485916494","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.21.1.0132","title":"<i>Possessive Individualism</i> at 50:","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possessive; Individualism; Marxist philosophy; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Media studies; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Peter Lindsay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03446593544990206,"gpt":0.3117071619864245,"spread":0.2772412265365224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001130407,0.00007570034,0.00009709843,0.000003745942,0.001128375,0.00004173874,0.0002887874,0.000113022,0.0005210537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007115692,0.00005455512,0.0001622124,0.00008695442,0.0005411144,0.0002578936,0.0001442735,0.0001490235,0.0004532424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001447444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008173507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006179389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001186491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988465,0.0001545558,0.0001041997,0.00009460278,0.0001924121,0.0006077379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992411,0.0003070758,0.00005344484,0.0001691352,0.00002060612,0.0002086806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001913893,0.00005753575,0.005257608,0.000004777687,0.00005480527,1.649398e-7,0.1194019,3.4179e-7,0.00003753707,0.7857402,0.08847522,0.0009679514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001208973,0.00000578212,0.004046312,0.000002994361,0.00002596514,9.480318e-7,0.01125892,0.000001128548,0.0001915625,0.009841423,0.9743959,0.0001081547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3027257,0.0007082145,0.00008173902,0.02179729,0.0008485384,0.0002563022,0.00002980938,0.0001378695,0.6734145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980904,0.0001186655,0.0001507439,0.00907169,0.001079858,0.00001828477,0.000003328363,0.000007182162,0.008646294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8859207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8678659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}