{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":38,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"56f2f990dcd5","filters":{"venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof"}},"results":[{"id":"W2779496185","doi":"10.1177/1365712717746419","title":"Unconfirmed accelerants","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arson; Fire investigation; Forensic engineering; Accidental; Flammable liquid; Computer security; History; Engineering; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Waste management","authors":[{"name":"Marika Linnéa Henneberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Neil Richard Morling","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.355893954199186,"gpt":0.5025763803040952,"spread":0.1466824261049092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02591341,0.0006837868,0.0005804053,0.001876361,0.002848122,0.002982372,0.00251148,0.005034649,0.006475504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1061471,0.0003604153,0.0005751564,0.0008707971,0.003146454,0.002375869,0.002748866,0.004630953,0.002356834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00117013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002871662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001697843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004091414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9810891,0.00545337,0.001723743,0.002377652,0.008075896,0.001280216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9140667,0.0562197,0.008436338,0.00650822,0.01361516,0.001153844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001320903,0.0003683645,0.096941,0.003532361,0.000360608,0.02991931,0.0775732,0.0009800567,0.02793268,0.3667236,0.09462707,0.2997209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001294577,0.001365737,0.05511092,0.007107883,0.001230895,0.03494473,0.04268225,0.006510066,0.09771842,0.1121878,0.6407289,0.0002829148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4984065,0.005262158,0.07424992,0.05339667,0.007825648,0.0008616578,0.001038213,0.0003540877,0.3586052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922439,0.0016547,0.02411375,0.01449887,0.0008720812,0.0001333071,0.0002286937,0.00004714458,0.03601228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02591341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1370449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312190782","doi":"10.1177/136571270200600103","title":"The Trouble with <i>Teixeira</i>: Developing a Principled Approach to Entrapment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; Supreme court; Covert; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Authorization; Computer security; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Ormerod","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew Roberts","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.224766889043869,"gpt":0.3583476129868369,"spread":0.1335807239429679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09620736,0.0007516279,0.001915902,0.003078052,0.01093783,0.02125025,0.007663503,0.02420751,0.0014696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08730268,0.001558066,0.002628108,0.001591784,0.1177724,0.01970392,0.01400791,0.0381404,0.0007151592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0110107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02959566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01272252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01375211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9066071,0.04505983,0.006894856,0.01218503,0.02567634,0.003576873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938949,0.03664607,0.004687039,0.01223124,0.00659895,0.0008876987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006922332,0.000007834685,0.00009574904,0.00004301181,0.000008168488,0.00003569037,0.001573221,0.0001732178,0.00006902296,0.9934304,0.001875747,0.002681029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002433381,0.00001989377,0.0001883315,0.0003260631,0.00001335551,0.0001198785,0.0006351101,0.0005687249,0.0003403076,0.9739105,0.02381591,0.00003746635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02307187,0.007495318,0.278554,0.4981501,0.002274913,0.0007374084,0.0002006125,0.0002078043,0.189308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6935428,0.002713306,0.1846088,0.09965287,0.002190183,0.001557133,0.00007426313,0.0002132156,0.01544739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09620736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5087992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915908076","doi":"10.1177/1365712718813795","title":"Taking the dialectical stance in reasoning with evidence and proof","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Probabilistic logic; Probabilistic argumentation; Computer science; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Deductive reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Floris Bex","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2137807572191932,"gpt":0.4468774098081574,"spread":0.2330966525889642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02131459,0.001243367,0.001358725,0.006587113,0.003755032,0.01110975,0.00379836,0.005622028,0.005437779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04398066,0.001140371,0.002611636,0.003884571,0.02412361,0.03045224,0.01163338,0.005788429,0.000876294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003833956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002505625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001671557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001612194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9776464,0.01464764,0.001390301,0.001852478,0.003985523,0.0004777441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603273,0.02982533,0.002221218,0.004378799,0.002425484,0.0008217855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007578069,0.00000610223,0.0001096711,0.00003903128,0.00001280269,0.00003821054,0.0004068919,0.0009850265,0.00004622313,0.994993,0.0001341204,0.003221417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007651112,0.00000764845,0.0000365844,0.00002897704,0.00001153882,0.00004027032,0.00009488437,0.00348915,0.0001079162,0.9932852,0.00288252,0.000007633736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006656783,0.001189107,0.9555424,0.008455078,0.0001927941,0.00008854717,0.00008047432,0.0001054881,0.02768933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4221971,0.001176514,0.5705655,0.001140637,0.0003290824,0.0004287116,0.0001207541,0.00009486991,0.003946895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02131459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1127237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804938249","doi":"10.1177/1365712718782990","title":"Gender discrimination and juries in the 20th century","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Political science; Politics; Franchise; Law; Inequality; Sociology; Jury selection","authors":[{"name":"Andrew L‐T Choo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jill Hunter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1937705289059404,"gpt":0.4461225939343225,"spread":0.2523520650283821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0222613,0.0002478099,0.0008358016,0.002230889,0.01895908,0.008458899,0.001050588,0.003673668,0.006122094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03004732,0.0004108311,0.0002846965,0.001481912,0.0356281,0.004505822,0.007871432,0.004862853,0.000614965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01266846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009681342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03241889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05300139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823642,0.007173874,0.001104837,0.001567362,0.00402467,0.003765203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878597,0.005532342,0.002216768,0.0004986923,0.002151397,0.001741102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001909171,0.0001140629,0.01032673,0.000158918,0.00002032428,0.0007116708,0.3652595,0.0001150477,0.000577294,0.5845543,0.005864219,0.03210693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005727954,0.0002984798,0.04499429,0.001265566,0.0000157359,0.0008314798,0.149436,0.0001183802,0.001001962,0.1017305,0.7001339,0.0001165681],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6132562,0.03189575,0.001685467,0.06298696,0.001245929,0.00004545196,0.00008687503,0.00001566944,0.2887817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707111,0.004047664,0.0002708545,0.006448144,0.0003865976,0.00003471451,0.00002247266,0.00001820895,0.01806024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03241889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1177304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947122861","doi":"10.1177/1365712719851133","title":"The detection of deception during trials: Ignoring the nonverbal communication of witnesses is not the solution—A response to Vrij and Turgeon (2018)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Credibility; Nonverbal communication; Psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Lie detection; Trustworthiness; Epistemology; Developmental psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Vincent Denault","is_ca":true},{"name":"Norah E. Dunbar","is_ca":false},{"name":"Pierrich Plusquellec","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1292355578640484,"gpt":0.4052362004551724,"spread":0.276000642591124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1118665,0.00120887,0.001661319,0.001964577,0.007314198,0.01223579,0.005725685,0.034118,0.00455415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3648739,0.001157447,0.00131088,0.001766053,0.03064534,0.02314682,0.007779668,0.05723141,0.003862323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00536818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007675878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006025523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006495337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9042664,0.05823114,0.007166011,0.01154991,0.01700592,0.001780572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.367438,0.5452966,0.02815274,0.01381651,0.0413969,0.003899308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003212319,0.0001016208,0.004052454,0.001787056,0.0001923622,0.001275885,0.0594074,0.0003995126,0.001796218,0.1124399,0.6934278,0.1247985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001190819,0.0002595659,0.005998009,0.008953574,0.0002017455,0.00619445,0.06157517,0.001662508,0.003903144,0.2100259,0.7005553,0.000551554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001447055,0.00380681,0.002964122,0.9858716,0.004535829,0.00001258149,0.00003467156,0.00002950715,0.001297822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04912897,0.004971346,0.004905972,0.9297505,0.009458276,0.0000721855,0.00003436309,0.00009081382,0.00158759],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1118665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5916135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264043653","doi":"10.1177/1365712715591462","title":"Aging witnesses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Witness; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Psychology; Criminology; Population; Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Helene Love","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3105581987531892,"gpt":0.4578514390084516,"spread":0.1472932402552624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003402435,0.000454807,0.0004464709,0.001319461,0.00326833,0.002198558,0.0005979885,0.001509832,0.01698272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02043134,0.0002624835,0.0004472063,0.0007098669,0.001633619,0.00477196,0.004297975,0.002537115,0.002799566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007859186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009096793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001831813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003615082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985693,0.0004937219,0.0001407851,0.000251057,0.0003471757,0.0001979835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938956,0.001820822,0.001228566,0.0007217433,0.001086089,0.001247192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000521762,0.0002358965,0.1114625,0.001619582,0.0001927499,0.01813158,0.1805055,0.0002189195,0.006692498,0.09625622,0.1438249,0.4403378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002880672,0.0003152248,0.05277404,0.002037743,0.0001133783,0.02585117,0.1061431,0.0001597782,0.001582642,0.02443923,0.7864749,0.00008011403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6624046,0.06757792,0.0120887,0.0617342,0.01154068,0.0003714174,0.001394624,0.0001430017,0.1827448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8820045,0.03978717,0.003971234,0.01582459,0.002926479,0.0001474303,0.0006433701,0.00006654969,0.05462871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01698272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05681282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310248845","doi":"10.1177/13657127221139506","title":"The contemporary status of rape shield laws in India","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Nikunj Kulshreshtha","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1606349516469797,"gpt":0.401471797130705,"spread":0.2408368454837254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002025709,0.0001517916,0.0002229189,0.003803063,0.004986652,0.009658647,0.001168453,0.001604813,0.002991169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00663655,0.0003418468,0.0002817223,0.004141718,0.01255148,0.002854747,0.002576458,0.00344486,0.0003153019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008756233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009177051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02748226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0344031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972513,0.0005156238,0.0001967645,0.0003139003,0.001211981,0.0005103411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934307,0.003263827,0.001358158,0.0003564403,0.001337128,0.0002538343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008635648,0.00005745784,0.01757752,0.001234192,0.00003021769,0.001968965,0.04703677,0.0005511861,0.002272682,0.7865444,0.007492164,0.1351482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001639426,0.0001666011,0.1223015,0.003716874,0.0001584535,0.006284629,0.09361873,0.0005437039,0.002769811,0.06809045,0.7020914,0.0002414349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4694578,0.09778178,0.002047794,0.06723522,0.001021457,0.00004526496,0.0003734281,0.00009574516,0.3619415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639595,0.02797984,0.0004914964,0.002914648,0.0003566267,0.00001271315,0.00009164208,0.00001820248,0.004175345],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02748226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06353122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225482477","doi":"10.1177/1365712715613485","title":"Confessions to Mr Big","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Scrutiny; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Common law; Political science; High Court; History","authors":[{"name":"Brendon Murphy","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Anderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3759581543813643,"gpt":0.4723487127284619,"spread":0.09639055834709764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003482501,0.0003192273,0.0003911975,0.0008338054,0.007300518,0.00230302,0.0008433709,0.003273921,0.006748875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02681651,0.0003434233,0.0004304555,0.0005865727,0.005165322,0.001894064,0.003698093,0.006132486,0.001410406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003110702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004084032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03465023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06315193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958459,0.001474641,0.0002456777,0.0004155844,0.001313414,0.0007049011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926805,0.003226107,0.001238222,0.0006465308,0.001522101,0.0006865274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003427001,0.00007260024,0.01076592,0.0005134062,0.00008330568,0.01778525,0.1789839,0.0002130318,0.005335404,0.3428936,0.3166154,0.1263955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001802186,0.0002215889,0.01196477,0.0006443618,0.00005272008,0.01518285,0.04030983,0.0003667811,0.004066871,0.02260831,0.904407,0.000157018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.3337723,0.009016468,0.009090466,0.1374621,0.009218268,0.0003205161,0.0006930617,0.0003522804,0.5000744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534293,0.001856116,0.002436946,0.04713269,0.001546945,0.00006644376,0.0001849526,0.00007583537,0.09327085],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03465023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06889713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007912515","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.106","title":"The Common Enterprise Exception to the Hearsay Rule","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Principal (computer security); Common law; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Agency (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Philosophy; Computer security; Data mining","authors":[{"name":"Keith Spencer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1040325825963491,"gpt":0.4238262595036901,"spread":0.319793676907341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01575929,0.0002405578,0.001020055,0.001860348,0.005922905,0.0104726,0.002147539,0.006349987,0.003425233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0603969,0.0005022653,0.001110563,0.001007139,0.01697345,0.004987501,0.00559382,0.008022981,0.001019427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004154186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01525026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02379714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02970595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9590018,0.008413567,0.002829319,0.004343659,0.02076059,0.004650989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707584,0.0157401,0.001999034,0.003662273,0.007020497,0.0008196919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001317697,0.000007171823,0.0004121202,0.00002266936,0.000005133719,0.0002010315,0.001031238,0.0002562351,0.0001872008,0.9924012,0.001160337,0.004302341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006601004,0.0001475331,0.004311094,0.0003538007,0.00005773042,0.001003317,0.003220273,0.002597373,0.001827144,0.8437003,0.1425809,0.0001344541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1555113,0.002400856,0.102471,0.02867609,0.001246266,0.0002512798,0.0001364269,0.0001978293,0.7091089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9332748,0.000702846,0.01367342,0.00639771,0.0004565398,0.0001648554,0.00006047839,0.00005422643,0.045215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02379714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0833441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124354858","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.1.308","title":"Weaknesses of Adjudication in the Face of Secret Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Secrecy; Acknowledgement; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Confidentiality; Law and economics; Strengths and weaknesses; Masking (illustration); Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Gus Van Harten","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1972302026298373,"gpt":0.4376579170917017,"spread":0.2404277144618644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.5843003,0.001193826,0.003616085,0.009216721,0.01280123,0.02112778,0.01270007,0.0208287,0.002816529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7361296,0.002639288,0.002207574,0.006840806,0.05215703,0.02255324,0.01963643,0.03048119,0.002834295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009057155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02224666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004939328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004536286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2694408,0.5034856,0.05959703,0.0229527,0.1385231,0.006000711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1575002,0.7048834,0.02419598,0.05487096,0.05592322,0.002626272],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003800362,0.00008136186,0.004348316,0.002324486,0.0002899405,0.0009308837,0.02845019,0.00148819,0.001039734,0.7772672,0.02942338,0.1539762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001806763,0.0001115537,0.001484403,0.004612408,0.0001396776,0.00133445,0.005793695,0.005111721,0.00154435,0.8410674,0.1383084,0.0003111568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03451513,0.01351844,0.4372209,0.4137145,0.007002552,0.003838116,0.0004479045,0.000516982,0.08922549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5921673,0.006333517,0.2794445,0.09786073,0.006473101,0.005824499,0.0001844796,0.00039819,0.01131371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5843003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5126318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914773908","doi":"10.1177/1365712718824123","title":"The ‘Corroborative Rule’ from a comparative and critical perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Convict; Mistake; Law; Jury; Statute; Reasonable doubt; Order (exchange); Common law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Guy Ben-David","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1636282324494962,"gpt":0.4585632105028251,"spread":0.2949349780533289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04293099,0.001086939,0.001434832,0.006193829,0.005512755,0.01303826,0.003783588,0.01096519,0.006198439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04854865,0.0008882102,0.001688406,0.003819807,0.04750474,0.02125103,0.00460873,0.01051382,0.001872768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006911597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006124813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003649683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002940778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9593633,0.02608429,0.002500942,0.004255857,0.006638271,0.001157223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9383528,0.0498294,0.002747099,0.004044991,0.004556119,0.0004695814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005582236,0.000003022346,0.0000357703,0.00014605,0.00000874229,0.00009949347,0.0009094054,0.00008149149,0.0000660639,0.9934673,0.002659959,0.002517095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001373309,0.00003193012,0.0001732087,0.000685078,0.00002573028,0.0003146023,0.0006993405,0.0003628627,0.000398541,0.7782592,0.2190033,0.00003251911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007082764,0.07740225,0.1897823,0.1472588,0.008239144,0.000439462,0.0006343136,0.0001751821,0.5689859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6572564,0.04757608,0.1635186,0.05789177,0.02034443,0.002249474,0.0007463563,0.0003012284,0.05011572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04293099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2270435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132652996","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.3.157","title":"Expert Evidence of Delay in Complaint in Childhood Sexual Abuse Prosecutions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Counterintuitive; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Sexual assault; Mythology; Affect (linguistics); Criminology; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Political science; Law; History; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Penney Lewis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08593711193608469,"gpt":0.3764056797921512,"spread":0.2904685678560666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0491812,0.0002291711,0.0006341744,0.004804182,0.001477196,0.003886333,0.001748433,0.006215629,0.00537174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4441935,0.0005109195,0.0005519689,0.001562078,0.00516814,0.006505394,0.003852522,0.004673065,0.0004397509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00232729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003549361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002255491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004067651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9438115,0.0307388,0.008764939,0.001954935,0.0130415,0.001688367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3931514,0.5290797,0.04414587,0.008591225,0.02280582,0.002225987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002764308,0.0005994242,0.1690526,0.01800163,0.0009404326,0.0338134,0.07047138,0.002304565,0.001749039,0.2277569,0.0384221,0.4341243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004398176,0.002390069,0.2282937,0.05919006,0.001512179,0.06244957,0.05775303,0.003446719,0.008780937,0.1766863,0.3984508,0.0006067555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.3990071,0.1661352,0.02187769,0.1753845,0.004629551,0.000571838,0.0007886361,0.00009259523,0.2315129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535496,0.0291303,0.003804267,0.009082829,0.001038619,0.00005808543,0.0001313079,0.00002047088,0.003184482],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0491812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2600982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166165129","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2010.14.4.361","title":"Doubting What the Elders Have to Say: A Critical Examination of Canadian Judicial Treatment of Aboriginal Oral History Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Oral history; Notice; Law; Mandate; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Rules of evidence; Judicial review; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Common law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"David Milward","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2006508127194054,"gpt":0.4318830265874217,"spread":0.2312322138680164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04531685,0.0006195504,0.001029501,0.009218454,0.06537222,0.01797003,0.005532588,0.009001893,0.001727399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1099227,0.0009228864,0.0007738888,0.009308024,0.04730463,0.006330772,0.006747015,0.01298575,0.000153481],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1563664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2680387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9779842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9694244,0.00736348,0.001722874,0.001897007,0.01384988,0.005742362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8990549,0.06101779,0.00248302,0.001413942,0.03356197,0.002468346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006435614,0.00002787362,0.00572787,0.0006767123,0.00004820508,0.003163195,0.4882912,0.0003681541,0.0006192627,0.4388198,0.02941614,0.03277731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006099361,0.00005252861,0.02241747,0.003787754,0.0003427913,0.0009733911,0.4242629,0.001183491,0.001668324,0.08147331,0.4633296,0.000447416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.304475,0.05178761,0.005226859,0.3454032,0.002322366,0.0005141534,0.0002686582,0.0000512544,0.2899508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388655,0.01312618,0.003587131,0.02818683,0.0004404267,0.00008686646,0.00004477382,0.00003323553,0.01562904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1563664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084963802","doi":"10.1350/ijep.10.4.280","title":"Without Fear or Favour? Trends and Possibilities in the Canadian Approach to Expert Human Behaviour Evidence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Scientific evidence; Political science; Relevance (law); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Emma Cunliffe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.221372687988687,"gpt":0.4527667752722754,"spread":0.2313940872835884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06531967,0.0007707645,0.001785213,0.0102925,0.02729552,0.03168588,0.008357217,0.01476619,0.005802931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1277928,0.00108396,0.001216788,0.01479194,0.0614366,0.01573972,0.008819146,0.02496948,0.0005480406],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1893866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2538593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9687312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9139148,0.0200765,0.003036879,0.008063138,0.04437336,0.0105353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8686313,0.06061663,0.003641439,0.004737683,0.05234201,0.01003092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006499104,0.00002987289,0.002068921,0.0004005446,0.00004022192,0.0002213442,0.01094273,0.0002194458,0.0001542455,0.8979763,0.0419784,0.04590302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107538,0.00006055782,0.01129324,0.002507052,0.0001357084,0.0004499964,0.02050495,0.001369058,0.0004642671,0.3758666,0.586819,0.0004221068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007712788,0.04251327,0.005498633,0.8583188,0.001389424,0.00004435716,0.0002066857,0.00005438828,0.08426165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5684222,0.07325331,0.01783391,0.3125016,0.003060964,0.0001736658,0.0002788908,0.0001898023,0.02428567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1893866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9401967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966623002","doi":"10.1350/ijep.9.2.73.64809","title":"The Contextualised Court: Litigating ‘Culture’ in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Multiculturalism; Legal culture; Law; Contextualism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Cultural issues; High Court; Cultural diversity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","authors":[{"name":"Robert J. Currie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06074616941425492,"gpt":0.3488412649417584,"spread":0.2880950955275035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00718434,0.0002323722,0.0005728738,0.002186188,0.03115742,0.01572502,0.002374298,0.002854597,0.00336897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02756834,0.000482369,0.0003382046,0.006171334,0.02633649,0.004412662,0.008313872,0.005733611,0.00010823],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1569712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2260411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867677,0.003564352,0.0004569695,0.0009814607,0.004898611,0.003330831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98234,0.007049073,0.00150906,0.0005669472,0.005356687,0.003178336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001238741,0.00008057896,0.03552126,0.0003557873,0.0001215936,0.002392706,0.3521631,0.001477988,0.001052994,0.5135749,0.01707939,0.07605574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007504522,0.0001027193,0.1000936,0.001908079,0.0002250858,0.0006793268,0.5017201,0.002375771,0.001489709,0.07634971,0.3145903,0.0003904142],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6872143,0.01448411,0.002946144,0.1030698,0.0004787272,0.0001103299,0.0002109252,0.00003020602,0.1914554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918891,0.002259794,0.0004045851,0.003181002,0.00002386063,0.00001052078,0.00002084755,0.000007364273,0.002202918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1569712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161670791","doi":"10.1177/13657127211011236","title":"The exclusion of prison informant evidence for unreliability in New Zealand","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Gatekeeping; Jury; Suspect; Supreme court; Deference; Criminology; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Anna High","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1801210453341474,"gpt":0.4501539560224675,"spread":0.2700329106883201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02688956,0.0002340041,0.0006558447,0.002638526,0.003292263,0.00582677,0.001570877,0.001699966,0.002214991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09727756,0.0005027819,0.0005604439,0.00139254,0.009500433,0.004111177,0.005383978,0.00400909,0.0002156169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009192382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01891709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2805529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.479033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870147,0.003675542,0.002216746,0.0008989325,0.005377114,0.0008169912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608352,0.02075901,0.007159616,0.003116211,0.006929402,0.00120062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001136237,0.0001411628,0.08781964,0.003406532,0.0002260782,0.02362521,0.2339249,0.0007925657,0.01312986,0.2828398,0.01823652,0.3347214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002091921,0.0005739081,0.3394189,0.01569619,0.0006744391,0.01974403,0.1069772,0.001996415,0.008924123,0.0933995,0.4117992,0.0005869534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.738574,0.01738743,0.01234639,0.1103985,0.0009831511,0.0004434246,0.00029661,0.0000295817,0.119541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757907,0.006332096,0.006912571,0.004649111,0.0001547673,0.000078949,0.00006025895,0.00002511579,0.005996483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2805529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5578399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121600658","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.75","title":"Improperly Obtained Evidence in the Commonwealth: Lessons for England and Wales?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; English law; Jurisdiction; Law; Convention; Scots law; Common law; Conformity; Legislation; Political science; Position (finance); High Court; Human rights; Sources of law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Andrew L‐T Choo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susan Nash","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3150991231661772,"gpt":0.4679963539616306,"spread":0.1528972307954534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03313495,0.000478862,0.001588502,0.004450965,0.005121002,0.01486519,0.002473,0.01221361,0.003740403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07131706,0.0007972197,0.0007847486,0.00430493,0.02305783,0.0190936,0.008761719,0.01020406,0.0004867864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02365621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0454714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3423215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4900426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9828126,0.00918125,0.001717948,0.001079748,0.002837408,0.00237114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9455185,0.03546689,0.002763117,0.002662713,0.009534086,0.004054766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002294361,0.0001313718,0.006730339,0.003890632,0.00009574893,0.005155831,0.07337528,0.0005403708,0.0006297663,0.6181669,0.03734117,0.2537131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001013203,0.0004808841,0.03935004,0.02590035,0.0001860153,0.004310564,0.1321764,0.0005303429,0.0006773241,0.2563906,0.5394795,0.0004166943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06240819,0.402613,0.002390241,0.4729132,0.003769748,0.00009001159,0.0001033722,0.00001598203,0.0556963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6344472,0.2444282,0.003293091,0.0969642,0.001506991,0.0001446785,0.00008163462,0.0000450265,0.01908904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3423215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.680658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753352173","doi":"10.1177/1365712717725536","title":"The diverging dictionaries of science and law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Notice; Scientific evidence; Phenomenon; Scientific terminology; Scientific literature; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Helena Likwornik","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jason Chin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Maya Bielinski","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1917086831110509,"gpt":0.4467994862173185,"spread":0.2550908031062676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01207372,0.0003848429,0.0007652555,0.00823387,0.00221214,0.005820404,0.001192756,0.001209339,0.004495144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1119949,0.0004891579,0.0003169517,0.009513324,0.009045219,0.007257519,0.005404239,0.003331983,0.001244879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002227234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002394505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001927622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003134587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9707822,0.014694,0.004779418,0.001630305,0.007671846,0.0004422474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8533477,0.09448501,0.01857035,0.01750171,0.01398399,0.002111254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004966331,0.0001540346,0.04710255,0.003041842,0.0001263212,0.0008304378,0.1151252,0.0008944381,0.01040089,0.5490012,0.02388493,0.2489415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006918867,0.0002261341,0.1274971,0.00474843,0.0001299038,0.003832509,0.07480417,0.006322201,0.004846954,0.3616648,0.4156461,0.0002124215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5073721,0.01374107,0.2337133,0.04533835,0.003487627,0.0008491005,0.003962538,0.0007490506,0.1907869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9214,0.003418338,0.06243628,0.005224536,0.0004792877,0.0004741999,0.001694763,0.0003471583,0.004525333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06385273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887570016","doi":"10.1177/1365712718787523","title":"Social science and humanities evidence in <i>Charter</i> litigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Digital humanities; Law; Art","authors":[{"name":"Jocelyn Downie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3473604263806609,"gpt":0.5234327946804664,"spread":0.1760723682998055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04435776,0.0003526877,0.0007342817,0.004041968,0.02904965,0.0224248,0.003230162,0.01958336,0.003526328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100056,0.000621217,0.0007299745,0.004014335,0.04275089,0.01114256,0.006204191,0.01650595,0.000324301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03639674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07471728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4656399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6152279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9592802,0.0163635,0.001578432,0.001734072,0.01250356,0.008540178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8928191,0.08865608,0.004839746,0.002097351,0.007445708,0.004141953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001316246,0.00002170593,0.001812657,0.00009654326,0.00001095193,0.001111179,0.02019076,0.0001494362,0.00009776051,0.9434599,0.02523656,0.007799334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007645098,0.0000818488,0.0102377,0.002970092,0.0001165379,0.001243098,0.05872236,0.001101267,0.001499166,0.4433398,0.4803932,0.0002185128],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05737198,0.01073446,0.005125755,0.5209102,0.001685969,0.0001265221,0.0001441455,0.00005443572,0.4038464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8585308,0.005142413,0.003733637,0.118732,0.001301347,0.00006317616,0.00006238234,0.00002594622,0.01240838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4656399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9258592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225487473","doi":"10.1177/1365712715613479","title":"The expert witness’s duty of impartiality in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Supreme court; Duty; Law; Expert witness; Political science; Trial court; Prejudice (legal term); Witness","authors":[{"name":"Chris Hunt","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lorne Neudorf","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3275671409319637,"gpt":0.5168705083783651,"spread":0.1893033674464014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01089824,0.0004521691,0.000758314,0.002018849,0.01286307,0.00893681,0.003399839,0.012688,0.004982929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03864114,0.0006066536,0.001090188,0.002410824,0.01117312,0.004359057,0.004256606,0.009340995,0.000447495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05940872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1844067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9513289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.972772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9805993,0.002508813,0.0008978082,0.001298714,0.009798812,0.004896631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814335,0.009471417,0.000743926,0.0005438738,0.006342843,0.00146449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002600027,0.0000157832,0.001426351,0.0002347501,0.00002801718,0.001645439,0.004224549,0.0005003216,0.0002193581,0.8952169,0.06597919,0.03048324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007594473,0.00004433427,0.006544554,0.002301444,0.0001801737,0.001359965,0.00542162,0.001575904,0.0007946824,0.1369655,0.8445064,0.0002294113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02669197,0.05869455,0.013503,0.3367517,0.006251926,0.0002520436,0.0003032941,0.00008922546,0.5574623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6986017,0.04317457,0.01008161,0.1545957,0.002947261,0.0001488599,0.0001469937,0.00007459504,0.09022871],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05940872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4310424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045457203","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.2.104","title":"Delayed Complaints in Childhood Sexual Abuse Prosecutions—A Comparative Evaluation of Admissibility Determinations and Judicial Warnings","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Jury; Law; Political science; Legislature; Criminology; Sexual assault; Sexual abuse; Psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Penney Lewis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1465600818705441,"gpt":0.4188097431467664,"spread":0.2722496612762223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0547388,0.0002609175,0.0006527356,0.003599279,0.002946399,0.003323936,0.002099014,0.004226718,0.003184955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3444499,0.0006420054,0.0007507316,0.002305802,0.006280976,0.003859673,0.00421471,0.005122822,0.0002572749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003288658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003871935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004216116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01003893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9493358,0.03034414,0.005152935,0.001512327,0.01141514,0.002239732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5374246,0.3962887,0.04296604,0.005387469,0.01567735,0.002255894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005583018,0.001436659,0.2094082,0.006064194,0.000439623,0.01046424,0.1802511,0.002744642,0.005016771,0.1260643,0.006530711,0.4459964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006541918,0.01057832,0.6235557,0.01241863,0.001129716,0.02208842,0.1664606,0.003383277,0.009906983,0.0303968,0.1188591,0.0005683792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9251224,0.02362749,0.005138328,0.007977647,0.0005758264,0.0002315029,0.00006122726,0.00003759353,0.03722795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900636,0.004994632,0.001734808,0.001360402,0.0002585111,0.00007082672,0.00002511968,0.00001640864,0.001475703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0547388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2894899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061777057","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.1.75","title":"Judicial Independence and Anti-Terrorism Legislation in Canada: Blurring the Investigative and Judicial Functions: <i>Re an Application under s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial discretion; Criminal code; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Terrorism; Penal code; Code (set theory); Judicial activism; Criminal law; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Byron Sheldrick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08279000444014531,"gpt":0.331445608750582,"spread":0.2486556043104367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008334304,0.000643283,0.0008871441,0.002437809,0.03070535,0.01277193,0.005471809,0.02520385,0.006061781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0279579,0.001197783,0.001734433,0.002891022,0.01313713,0.00310974,0.003507799,0.01812399,0.0006738032],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1234898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3892776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9768597,0.001516748,0.0007059146,0.001111993,0.009686967,0.01011863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794118,0.006761205,0.001453851,0.0005626989,0.009005114,0.002805392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001721885,0.000152344,0.01269966,0.0002872423,0.0001316317,0.001231364,0.01297043,0.001341971,0.001641436,0.4665549,0.4708744,0.0319423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003696373,0.0001537158,0.1255691,0.001286568,0.0007118038,0.000485328,0.01891076,0.004110294,0.005938783,0.05537335,0.786287,0.0008036648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07920517,0.009139593,0.002731555,0.6661624,0.003345508,0.0003898856,0.001467084,0.0001900317,0.2373688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5426208,0.00652406,0.005348168,0.3094667,0.001670246,0.0002122647,0.0005167504,0.000143942,0.1334972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8765101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8959858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094858247","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.4.329","title":"Reasonable Doubt in Credibility Contests: Sexual Assault and Sexual Equality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Credibility; Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Christine Lesley Boyle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1403326277753384,"gpt":0.410591200654629,"spread":0.2702585728792906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02538696,0.0004679256,0.001135659,0.003366846,0.01119642,0.01541584,0.002870828,0.018055,0.007469003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08017664,0.0005310969,0.0009139242,0.003160901,0.06615902,0.02018671,0.008931997,0.01063696,0.0004111048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01523462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04147924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04109158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.975045,0.01488634,0.0008572526,0.001413713,0.004852533,0.002945179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9362531,0.0519102,0.003736006,0.002017174,0.004587058,0.001496394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001198608,0.000004533163,0.0002052945,0.00001730454,0.000003654597,0.0001980358,0.003120666,0.00009270218,0.0000231935,0.9939719,0.0007807169,0.001570083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002027655,0.000008768138,0.0006050777,0.0001577223,0.00001168314,0.0002064421,0.003825239,0.000519176,0.0001034068,0.9846075,0.009911872,0.00002272103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08957842,0.01842259,0.03282699,0.2476758,0.001106646,0.0000885416,0.00009962037,0.00003613424,0.6101654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885039,0.001511171,0.00139081,0.00377923,0.0005660835,0.00003308371,0.00001143984,0.00001200248,0.004192285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04147924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1342607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209528132","doi":"","title":"Doubting what the Elders have to say","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Law; Mandate; Objectivity (philosophy); Supreme court; Sovereignty; Oral history; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Milward","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1754112075490245,"gpt":0.4751415685260832,"spread":0.2997303609770587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02049463,0.0003609916,0.001068742,0.0009832249,0.01020545,0.007419483,0.001356487,0.008820334,0.007312241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06077567,0.0004159297,0.0005738126,0.000658899,0.03075501,0.01430379,0.005349738,0.011003,0.002151416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003905339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01502393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03477285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05190076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924898,0.003299585,0.000607092,0.0006533577,0.001946724,0.001003462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717777,0.01426276,0.002396245,0.001711952,0.007087377,0.002763888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001699304,0.0001000841,0.01319147,0.0009111731,0.0001292851,0.004280705,0.1917319,0.0001793606,0.001520473,0.4032826,0.2751049,0.1093981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003366824,0.00006417173,0.003920662,0.002345442,0.0001040522,0.001892445,0.1641777,0.0001344862,0.0009128104,0.2127015,0.6135844,0.0001287132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03563401,0.01469627,0.002979063,0.8595072,0.007613333,0.00002622148,0.0001746908,0.00003558912,0.07933374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5105649,0.01564474,0.002927903,0.4329338,0.00488083,0.0000354104,0.0001436056,0.0000640073,0.03280485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03477285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1083872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239874989","doi":"10.1177/1365712718765194","title":"Case commentaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1983410877336306,"gpt":0.4309837070251528,"spread":0.2326426192915222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01292973,0.001295902,0.001245616,0.003709781,0.01318146,0.006239937,0.006651187,0.06362189,0.04755514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1232374,0.001070367,0.00263711,0.002131111,0.005569154,0.004531049,0.006136475,0.04140317,0.01338257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007014087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007816599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01091943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01923694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9831787,0.004226699,0.001673771,0.003100771,0.004261154,0.003558783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9484411,0.03672668,0.002558707,0.003291915,0.007039529,0.001941969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001053428,0.00005069571,0.0005973736,0.0002282616,0.00003017057,0.01685854,0.003793855,0.0000899405,0.0004497565,0.04307285,0.9280846,0.006638808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003932391,0.00002327683,0.0006397856,0.000649235,0.0000511867,0.005175008,0.004190057,0.0001652007,0.0005178081,0.01077127,0.9777231,0.00005479656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.008785628,0.003659348,0.002019089,0.7032442,0.0753872,0.0006110866,0.0007476612,0.0002390844,0.2053066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04894894,0.002072473,0.0009617963,0.7294968,0.0158354,0.0008978788,0.0002406082,0.0001549901,0.201391],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06362189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1590878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080502037","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.3.213","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Khelawon</i> —Continuing Reform of the Law of Hearsay in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Dale E. Ives","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08338161060927719,"gpt":0.3579884174372023,"spread":0.2746068068279252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006554282,0.0003525794,0.0007791503,0.001853479,0.02868783,0.01361344,0.004643536,0.01075332,0.01192042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01876646,0.0008204069,0.0007876607,0.002425199,0.0108255,0.003746379,0.004295228,0.01303448,0.0006027234],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1847863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4492455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914171,0.0007079383,0.0002541474,0.0006664313,0.003019588,0.003934932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877688,0.002739902,0.0004154425,0.0003096225,0.0053878,0.003378454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001679414,0.0001159696,0.006185681,0.0003569851,0.00005495735,0.0008846422,0.01344676,0.001443623,0.001991587,0.7821288,0.1439765,0.04924655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000215916,0.00008820486,0.02287795,0.0005959956,0.0001124261,0.0001897444,0.02185105,0.003503786,0.002416528,0.05410715,0.8936555,0.0003856424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1457699,0.01241259,0.004562254,0.5472909,0.003792616,0.0003964573,0.0008669492,0.0002395166,0.2846688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7112474,0.0053415,0.006095835,0.08391994,0.0006439052,0.0001208908,0.0002166921,0.0001745149,0.1922393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1847863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9455323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408557619","doi":"10.1177/13657127251326782","title":"Beliefs about deception in Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Wilcoxson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vincent Denault","is_ca":true},{"name":"Matthew Browne","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nathan Brooks","is_ca":false},{"name":"Paul Duckett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1490327404971154,"gpt":0.4655581450462823,"spread":0.3165254045491669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002895306,0.0001729135,0.0003295908,0.0008865977,0.001578878,0.001319569,0.0004834482,0.0004527688,0.002889365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01496049,0.0002254456,0.0002011729,0.0006501479,0.00160208,0.001023529,0.001675935,0.001577473,0.0002446108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00222283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002011273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06355036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05309073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981463,0.0007117585,0.0001464742,0.000158249,0.0006395782,0.0001976761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926215,0.00191063,0.002263825,0.0003467954,0.00184329,0.001013819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001518014,0.0003978525,0.534092,0.0004034006,0.0001118218,0.001023725,0.3499818,0.0001361693,0.001805773,0.003594849,0.002421804,0.1058789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001354045,0.0004566442,0.9141547,0.0004671194,0.0000564669,0.000758912,0.07100055,0.0003939839,0.0002843394,0.001423778,0.01094218,0.00004783338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991928,0.0006923254,0.0001473413,0.001138624,0.00002141343,0.00001773703,0.00002026475,0.000002627749,0.006031795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983276,0.0004934047,0.00007093649,0.0002433082,0.000007126383,0.000008577511,0.000009144629,0.000001509524,0.0008384581],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06355036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1263609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032902571","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.447","title":"Judging, Fast and Slow: Using Decision-Making Theory to Explore Judicial Fact Determination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Emma Cunliffe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.118251817099726,"gpt":0.3252852330692548,"spread":0.2070334159695288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03150223,0.0008097701,0.001078639,0.004427005,0.002712306,0.0103462,0.002655579,0.003350498,0.004159081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1052274,0.000732259,0.001565449,0.002951558,0.02529266,0.01502172,0.003882149,0.004945449,0.000355105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005274117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003654934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004241521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003120995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9735444,0.02042055,0.0008132789,0.001884439,0.002297292,0.001039993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8784512,0.1070289,0.005998474,0.004256221,0.003059525,0.001205749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001127606,0.00009359549,0.004991717,0.0001697427,0.0001071276,0.000228237,0.01122591,0.01164905,0.0002593266,0.9437386,0.0007331197,0.02669063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003199156,0.00003630315,0.001499748,0.0000853442,0.00002204814,0.00005016232,0.0016656,0.0206048,0.0001732373,0.9732386,0.0025609,0.00003133616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2771678,0.00763862,0.5609025,0.02338364,0.0005153345,0.0004691065,0.000188057,0.0001110784,0.1296239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244527,0.001078124,0.07194857,0.000694424,0.000152424,0.0002177636,0.00005913173,0.00003171653,0.001365055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03150223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1666017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776141614","doi":"10.1177/1365712717746420","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Bradshaw</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Supreme court; Reliability (semiconductor); Test (biology); Law; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Chris Hunt","is_ca":true},{"name":"Micah B. Rankin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.268432360058455,"gpt":0.458226880767542,"spread":0.189794520709087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01051524,0.0006722676,0.001247545,0.001440269,0.016166,0.01288922,0.006453543,0.03363055,0.009319738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03004556,0.001431087,0.002544817,0.001841686,0.01124642,0.002997206,0.003046554,0.02884602,0.00411915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03222956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05906868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8597223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9283252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9843424,0.001271091,0.0009210941,0.001994504,0.007149165,0.004321804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854935,0.00614411,0.000600898,0.0007978801,0.005801901,0.00116176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004556821,0.0000268883,0.0009856311,0.00007689559,0.00002998585,0.0004727809,0.001830239,0.000215858,0.0007375397,0.3674652,0.6220518,0.00606155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069437,0.00005521258,0.004516864,0.0004847752,0.0001142005,0.000382467,0.002442258,0.001098678,0.003381639,0.05471176,0.9324028,0.0003399412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01324417,0.003497996,0.007229297,0.6191052,0.01079887,0.0002703392,0.001566525,0.0008323723,0.3434553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1068936,0.001108852,0.00713708,0.7787811,0.002462223,0.0001487191,0.0003032382,0.0002481119,0.1029171],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8597223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2822075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013505516","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.11.1.49","title":"Filling in the Blanks for Litigation Privilege: <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Blank; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Privilege (computing); Engineering; Mechanical engineering","authors":[{"name":"Dale E. Ives","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stephen G. A. Pitel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0961047505531322,"gpt":0.3825391091228876,"spread":0.2864343585697554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02134511,0.0007094554,0.001487933,0.004592516,0.03055048,0.01940865,0.005154151,0.02067003,0.03136848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0848051,0.001576033,0.001508299,0.003117676,0.01249911,0.00762389,0.005442075,0.01545928,0.004633589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0483184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2317689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8708965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9435877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9693661,0.003643674,0.001378084,0.001903884,0.01331407,0.01039416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492253,0.01902963,0.001861676,0.003023075,0.02018929,0.006671093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039992,0.00006212469,0.002081862,0.00009829998,0.00002010077,0.0004036711,0.003933059,0.0001914196,0.0004502474,0.2968721,0.6671062,0.02874096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007368029,0.00004702865,0.00964657,0.0007999762,0.00009056056,0.0004466541,0.008341546,0.001057628,0.001902738,0.08763144,0.8896394,0.0003226874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01910072,0.003521471,0.01430016,0.3281434,0.006842079,0.0008548905,0.001823694,0.001066752,0.6243467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3425153,0.002338499,0.02648631,0.3152643,0.001793585,0.0006131772,0.0008333632,0.0009564841,0.309199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1291035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3505762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243586645","doi":"10.1177/1365712719874633","title":"Noticeboard","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1154802471381608,"gpt":0.3659320149913201,"spread":0.2504517678531593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003778851,0.001109517,0.0009036986,0.002987702,0.002600841,0.008168316,0.001988594,0.003803975,0.8441926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03686021,0.0006377997,0.0008152241,0.001765732,0.0007911655,0.004543029,0.004067933,0.004176937,0.6349397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001566951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003951562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004349395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007195631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961962,0.0006365214,0.0002109414,0.0004095843,0.002097238,0.0004496748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795929,0.00547396,0.0008388843,0.002877606,0.008010654,0.003205876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003544986,0.00001211564,0.00003675096,0.00004306361,9.401947e-7,0.00002092286,0.00002459479,0.000009311515,0.00007093518,0.00135707,0.9782012,0.02018769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001024917,0.000006306022,0.00009646401,0.00003069129,0.000001146928,0.00001636751,0.0000393563,0.00002085158,0.00006079698,0.00091281,0.9988003,0.000004633316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000590333,0.0006987916,0.00330314,0.01893373,0.02925639,0.0005301432,0.008861758,0.006904365,0.9309213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002621451,0.0003490334,0.001030902,0.004755661,0.00333859,0.0001772605,0.003401897,0.00170034,0.9826249],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1558074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2222402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338304353","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.448","title":"Hearsay by Implication: <i>R</i> v <i>Baldree</i>","year":2014,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Chris Hunt","is_ca":true},{"name":"Micah B. Rankin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0907127877805838,"gpt":0.3793831550748223,"spread":0.2886703672942385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003742712,0.0004699182,0.0007210376,0.0007762819,0.005832372,0.006324728,0.002179786,0.01095931,0.03696506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03650928,0.0004205568,0.0005868767,0.0005457673,0.005205554,0.004504936,0.002630056,0.01316678,0.009639668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003696603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004539364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03735504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0413827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964761,0.001003793,0.0002106327,0.0009719266,0.0008349942,0.0005025419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919709,0.004563605,0.0004619518,0.0005510599,0.002054122,0.0003983211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005450959,0.00001457519,0.000433753,0.00007393216,0.00002113756,0.0005933754,0.002843207,0.00004604557,0.0004741237,0.3704295,0.6123701,0.01264573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003959567,0.00002942268,0.001145541,0.0002747347,0.0000523906,0.001151685,0.003050635,0.0005829236,0.001674246,0.1547645,0.8371469,0.00008751004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.006325491,0.002331703,0.008277074,0.5504589,0.032602,0.00008893224,0.0004018233,0.00041489,0.3990993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2675777,0.001205457,0.003604206,0.3757587,0.01515002,0.0001439958,0.0001826326,0.000423542,0.3359537],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03735504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1236604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000251237","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.3.212","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Henry</i> : A Welcome Retreat from an Overly Broad Interpretation of S. 13 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Dale E. Ives","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03020607224087154,"gpt":0.3113570938715569,"spread":0.2811510216306853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03524364,0.001207786,0.002132443,0.002037514,0.02173976,0.02351023,0.01020348,0.04165969,0.004577185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07754277,0.001144259,0.001388722,0.002676984,0.05520723,0.01208628,0.005473122,0.07547335,0.002163525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03198298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08039501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7998619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8711781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9706041,0.006515519,0.001711655,0.002643768,0.01461506,0.003909981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939726,0.03303375,0.001873828,0.002593178,0.01742699,0.005346176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001596436,0.000008208053,0.00009306439,0.00005038473,0.000008388442,0.00009289122,0.003446969,0.00005937411,0.0001054002,0.1144626,0.8773672,0.004289411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003318172,0.00002135737,0.00076947,0.0004796528,0.00001918858,0.0001379517,0.005716105,0.0003520481,0.0003250113,0.06394181,0.9280077,0.0001965255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004955268,0.00228546,0.00107491,0.9706045,0.01493522,0.00001979259,0.00008698649,0.00007462677,0.01042292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02114595,0.00234267,0.004044268,0.9304439,0.01253807,0.00007764294,0.00007174131,0.0003106461,0.02902506],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2001381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4026334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018345762","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.4.322","title":"Litigation Privilege: Transient or Timeless? <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Adversarial system; Governor; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"James Goudkamp","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0981673817290953,"gpt":0.3851083503480055,"spread":0.2869409686189102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01570308,0.0003284912,0.001017311,0.00145361,0.01034243,0.02874547,0.004215532,0.01404371,0.00904984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04373928,0.0004981803,0.0005488942,0.00141461,0.03867064,0.01944948,0.006908355,0.02115058,0.001365591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02777744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0357973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2402273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4132047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9839975,0.002737804,0.00097913,0.002447215,0.005318817,0.004519532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976823,0.01155577,0.002119522,0.00167217,0.004438702,0.003390831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002105271,0.0000153275,0.001470152,0.00008103088,0.000007085128,0.0003018361,0.004710068,0.00002922115,0.0001821287,0.8556741,0.1142571,0.02325103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002006278,0.00005705466,0.006427127,0.001349017,0.00002965902,0.000933016,0.01671451,0.0003008136,0.000614613,0.2109848,0.7624077,0.0001616759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008630313,0.01431043,0.00350357,0.8490163,0.004581877,0.00004018638,0.0001696332,0.0001272973,0.1196203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5481912,0.009378267,0.002313236,0.3605916,0.007781921,0.00008990047,0.0001710379,0.0001782132,0.07130456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7597727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.477658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124416878","doi":"10.1177/1365712717690752","title":"Loosening the law’s bite: Law, fact, and expert evidence in <i>R</i> v <i>JA</i> and <i>R</i> v <i>NS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Framing (construction); Law; Face (sociological concept); Status quo; Hearsay; Political science; Sociology; History; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Dana Phillips","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2189871331869706,"gpt":0.4240047522478299,"spread":0.2050176190608593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04059429,0.0006239405,0.001204952,0.004232084,0.0236295,0.03251565,0.004463095,0.02398275,0.003837178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08163026,0.001131937,0.0009874547,0.003082281,0.09034406,0.03240034,0.008508516,0.0267548,0.0004127297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03334422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03581332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.446591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5556988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9738814,0.01125658,0.001054658,0.001895825,0.007809178,0.004102441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411947,0.04809109,0.001883381,0.002067908,0.005257064,0.001505898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001730876,0.00001208072,0.0005488668,0.00006237625,0.00001199898,0.0007057288,0.01633218,0.0001323828,0.0001224522,0.9636953,0.01071982,0.007639628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004251782,0.00002893585,0.002500565,0.001217049,0.00005871254,0.0005363065,0.03295133,0.0009431062,0.0006004177,0.7894349,0.1715232,0.0001629774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04321221,0.01564689,0.01500631,0.7318355,0.001674975,0.00009122285,0.0001197589,0.00005068584,0.1923624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8641071,0.006493478,0.007980099,0.1048266,0.001742516,0.00008208467,0.00006086075,0.00008252918,0.01462477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.446591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8879832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082028856","doi":"","title":"Social media-Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Gans","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3187710806736269,"gpt":0.4632453971916218,"spread":0.1444743165179949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002044158,0.0009284755,0.0007549066,0.003324889,0.009121391,0.01066136,0.001789316,0.002557521,0.1779248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007374826,0.0006471167,0.0009156566,0.005487833,0.001536325,0.002458234,0.00289581,0.00318782,0.0349692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05489428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2382359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951589,0.000248181,0.0001200947,0.0004675342,0.002716261,0.001289157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882782,0.0006319122,0.0001884886,0.0003158957,0.00755926,0.003026234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001273206,0.00008195972,0.002839812,0.0001739894,0.00001673951,0.0001076066,0.0002125052,0.0001529195,0.0001478802,0.02307983,0.923614,0.04944537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005038143,0.00001988282,0.008154796,0.0001575452,0.00001339782,0.00003922112,0.0006681231,0.0002186331,0.0002518545,0.001345254,0.9890535,0.00002742016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.008878496,0.008323472,0.001056268,0.05422332,0.005039979,0.0004797981,0.1044965,0.00113787,0.8163642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02996014,0.003533694,0.00123369,0.004231151,0.0002483833,0.0001611023,0.01479707,0.0003478964,0.9454868],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8220751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5952179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240971876","doi":"10.1177/1365712719853154","title":"Case commentary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07591591282140106,"gpt":0.3452271423078668,"spread":0.2693112294864658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002913778,0.0005991531,0.0009868296,0.002320146,0.004196555,0.00397293,0.002757956,0.03093036,0.04210642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05489111,0.0006038627,0.001120858,0.001159966,0.003813996,0.003528302,0.00274343,0.01687159,0.01087987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004298853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006500555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002941872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006075667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962617,0.001046897,0.0003863631,0.0006205312,0.001026213,0.0006583408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860444,0.007195849,0.001254152,0.0007419682,0.002787952,0.001975772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002087137,0.00001460805,0.0008045233,0.0002508749,0.00002058535,0.0575209,0.0004486227,0.0000632034,0.0000869123,0.01952068,0.9078518,0.01339641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002524449,0.0000106324,0.0004518275,0.001245871,0.0000309281,0.06936268,0.001110868,0.0001006284,0.00008434868,0.01346389,0.9140871,0.00002611575],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001860268,0.007949333,0.0004162623,0.8452526,0.06141829,0.00006091366,0.0001274676,0.00006053318,0.0828543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0736688,0.01325055,0.001079722,0.6917486,0.1477915,0.0002153741,0.0001988886,0.00008573454,0.07196089],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04210642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240803306","doi":"10.1177/1365712719893192","title":"Case commentary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07591591282140106,"gpt":0.3452271423078668,"spread":0.2693112294864658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002913778,0.0005991531,0.0009868296,0.002320146,0.004196555,0.00397293,0.002757956,0.03093036,0.04210642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05489111,0.0006038627,0.001120858,0.001159966,0.003813996,0.003528302,0.00274343,0.01687159,0.01087987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004298853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006500555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002941872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006075667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962617,0.001046897,0.0003863631,0.0006205312,0.001026213,0.0006583408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860444,0.007195849,0.001254152,0.0007419682,0.002787952,0.001975772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002087137,0.00001460805,0.0008045233,0.0002508749,0.00002058535,0.0575209,0.0004486227,0.0000632034,0.0000869123,0.01952068,0.9078518,0.01339641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002524449,0.0000106324,0.0004518275,0.001245871,0.0000309281,0.06936268,0.001110868,0.0001006284,0.00008434868,0.01346389,0.9140871,0.00002611575],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001860268,0.007949333,0.0004162623,0.8452526,0.06141829,0.00006091366,0.0001274676,0.00006053318,0.0828543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0736688,0.01325055,0.001079722,0.6917486,0.1477915,0.0002153741,0.0001988886,0.00008573454,0.07196089],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04210642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}