{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":38,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"56f2f990dcd5","filters":{"venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof"}},"results":[{"id":"W2779496185","doi":"10.1177/1365712717746419","title":"Unconfirmed accelerants","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arson; Fire investigation; Forensic engineering; Accidental; Flammable liquid; Computer security; History; Engineering; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Waste management","authors":[{"name":"Marika Linnéa Henneberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Neil Richard Morling","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.355893954199186,"gpt":0.5025763803040952,"spread":0.1466824261049092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005179455,0.0000679686,0.0001261899,0.00007675978,0.0006599765,0.0005114959,0.002726554,0.00004576544,0.0003900607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01067859,0.00004010052,0.0001237989,0.00004540908,0.0005381116,0.001049535,0.0001419682,0.000271525,0.00002767004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001568763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004062177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007482633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006521659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980033,0.0002365009,0.0003335823,0.00008868098,0.001187549,0.0001503771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971533,0.0005824849,0.000878833,0.0002687195,0.001044463,0.0000722007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007366103,0.0000946117,0.02341494,0.000009096321,0.0003603079,0.0001830825,0.01331038,0.0001399105,0.009344952,0.02368464,0.01259496,0.9161265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001793196,0.0004625974,0.1553807,0.002469109,0.0001589738,0.0004752459,0.004645606,0.0003843677,0.07732625,0.1469488,0.6093252,0.0006300083],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7207102,0.0007711417,0.008612301,0.2197907,0.01841072,0.0004101686,0.00000250252,0.00003685645,0.0312555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936597,0.000244978,0.002366147,0.0003948036,0.001595171,0.00000240821,3.657836e-8,0.000005872144,0.001730821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9154965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312190782","doi":"10.1177/136571270200600103","title":"The Trouble with <i>Teixeira</i>: Developing a Principled Approach to Entrapment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; Supreme court; Covert; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Authorization; Computer security; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Ormerod","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew Roberts","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.224766889043869,"gpt":0.3583476129868369,"spread":0.1335807239429679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002444396,0.0000826195,0.00008977442,0.00006005045,0.0005328138,0.0003590334,0.001340107,0.00001938865,0.00003106453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008994125,0.00003741596,0.00005143621,0.0001884078,0.0001363968,0.0005756317,0.00009899239,0.0002145387,0.00003162467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002166927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001754125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001095617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001840271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979566,0.0002111166,0.000322356,0.0001132836,0.001194198,0.0002024412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985161,0.0003452057,0.0003084925,0.0001397669,0.0006086511,0.00008176649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004773169,0.0009617127,0.003081324,0.000106784,0.001231205,0.0002728891,0.1809753,0.004996035,0.004868831,0.270845,0.04743035,0.4804574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007735155,0.0007138648,0.001635174,0.001323471,0.0001742118,0.0004020968,0.02097624,0.0006273702,0.003379743,0.001558256,0.9680763,0.0003597871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2836961,0.00573696,0.2983642,0.3554751,0.003659998,0.002842226,0.000006746646,0.00009542768,0.05012322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903683,0.001146841,0.004663417,0.001289709,0.0008963181,0.00002001402,2.94276e-7,0.000009865064,0.00160522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9206459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4098026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915908076","doi":"10.1177/1365712718813795","title":"Taking the dialectical stance in reasoning with evidence and proof","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Probabilistic logic; Probabilistic argumentation; Computer science; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Deductive reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Floris Bex","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas Walton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2137807572191932,"gpt":0.4468774098081574,"spread":0.2330966525889642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005359668,0.0001028153,0.0001453006,0.0000782065,0.0004073475,0.0003162895,0.001349612,0.00004558205,0.0002058574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01027728,0.00005001829,0.0000434999,0.0003380877,0.001756908,0.001314975,0.0001219277,0.0004076438,0.000008863095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002430677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005415533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001065273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008908401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973949,0.0004014956,0.0004486029,0.0001653385,0.001329766,0.0002598623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957693,0.002265255,0.0005922843,0.0001593319,0.001143543,0.00007033945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003892688,0.0002943631,0.268727,0.00003461237,0.0002978939,0.0003627368,0.1516053,0.001005251,0.00386896,0.2223204,0.001603052,0.3459878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001764018,0.007160331,0.2555637,0.07403203,0.0005908249,0.00224451,0.08670582,0.01372758,0.1719036,0.2855646,0.0979664,0.002776576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8975284,0.003341518,0.009861049,0.08334347,0.001427343,0.0005549406,7.181222e-7,0.00001588696,0.003926754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967407,0.0003260243,0.0007853985,0.0004983422,0.001446473,0.000009496169,2.365828e-8,0.000008310959,0.000185211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3432112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804938249","doi":"10.1177/1365712718782990","title":"Gender discrimination and juries in the 20th century","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Political science; Politics; Franchise; Law; Inequality; Sociology; Jury selection","authors":[{"name":"Andrew L‐T Choo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jill Hunter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1937705289059404,"gpt":0.4461225939343225,"spread":0.2523520650283821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003485133,0.00005548476,0.00007303263,0.0001012663,0.0001965908,0.0002646514,0.001078583,0.00002773528,0.00006940695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002878119,0.00002594468,0.00003395665,0.0001676054,0.000436522,0.00080879,0.00007453947,0.0001597406,0.000006786103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006544963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002344468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007356226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005695857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99815,0.0002371938,0.0002735644,0.00007918705,0.001150514,0.0001095401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980258,0.0008441524,0.0002751481,0.00008518094,0.0007440708,0.00002569935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006598383,0.000239665,0.04053565,0.00002624458,0.0001193591,0.00008112573,0.3069568,0.00003470937,0.0006850978,0.1941172,0.01916273,0.4373816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006273616,0.0003931987,0.3808137,0.001323927,0.00008875352,0.0002877915,0.05484131,0.000102824,0.001166265,0.2834368,0.2766216,0.0002964902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8896881,0.004621451,0.001500974,0.09642395,0.001760871,0.0002427482,0.000001725901,0.000008872755,0.00575125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968737,0.001003604,0.0002421551,0.0009060703,0.0008371599,0.000002409834,1.06456e-7,0.000003228389,0.0001315702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4370851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3445586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947122861","doi":"10.1177/1365712719851133","title":"The detection of deception during trials: Ignoring the nonverbal communication of witnesses is not the solution—A response to Vrij and Turgeon (2018)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Credibility; Nonverbal communication; Psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Lie detection; Trustworthiness; Epistemology; Developmental psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Vincent Denault","is_ca":true},{"name":"Norah E. Dunbar","is_ca":false},{"name":"Pierrich Plusquellec","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1292355578640484,"gpt":0.4052362004551724,"spread":0.276000642591124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00892222,0.0001129229,0.0002334952,0.0001498491,0.0002440387,0.00006452792,0.001006482,0.00007116939,0.0002246536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001979503,0.00004934603,0.0001664875,0.000218437,0.0003508185,0.0002505379,0.0001455195,0.000342621,0.00003116029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001040709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006926474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000866906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009856191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967266,0.001429383,0.0009480744,0.0001404342,0.0006146762,0.0001408859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937494,0.003551528,0.001376604,0.000535952,0.0007516776,0.00003488779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04546018,0.000190591,0.004254873,0.00002462196,0.0009633795,0.000003033947,0.02755985,0.0004574955,0.6198549,0.001458216,0.003052993,0.2967199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004732318,0.002203248,0.7002834,0.001471792,0.0003685958,0.002036489,0.01656432,0.0006405845,0.2146666,0.006207037,0.05041094,0.0004146671],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615507,0.001928993,0.002152548,0.03116094,0.002631451,0.0004136274,0.000004004169,0.000006935243,0.0001508368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976096,0.0006989668,0.00004013815,0.0004175763,0.0002178844,0.00002083802,2.312847e-7,0.000009606462,0.0009851196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6960285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3092281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264043653","doi":"10.1177/1365712715591462","title":"Aging witnesses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Witness; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Psychology; Criminology; Population; Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Helene Love","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3105581987531892,"gpt":0.4578514390084516,"spread":0.1472932402552624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001403372,0.00007701043,0.0001190466,0.0001523495,0.00003040806,0.00005380167,0.0007854812,0.00004107973,0.001197683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005604368,0.00004315237,0.00008949642,0.0001211303,0.0001429595,0.0002944578,0.00005446527,0.0002492905,0.0003214295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007059985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008787523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001636994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007956665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987071,0.0001347764,0.0003857243,0.0001010583,0.0005518082,0.0001195259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982586,0.0001946698,0.0004048739,0.0001769033,0.0008783846,0.00008659848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00297055,0.0004792304,0.01788546,0.000006432349,0.001018825,0.000610848,0.01230183,0.0004636348,0.002862212,0.02824455,0.6053326,0.3278238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00375003,0.001366446,0.03303792,0.0006152397,0.0001251936,0.01617007,0.006962599,0.0001175936,0.004138494,0.05122761,0.8820723,0.0004165054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7338219,0.006621665,0.03826258,0.1189222,0.05329398,0.0003233243,0.000004103369,0.00007787227,0.04867239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921509,0.00003786639,0.0002176219,0.001993869,0.00121675,0.000004427928,2.525572e-7,0.000008298072,0.004369981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3274073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310248845","doi":"10.1177/13657127221139506","title":"The contemporary status of rape shield laws in India","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Nikunj Kulshreshtha","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1606349516469797,"gpt":0.401471797130705,"spread":0.2408368454837254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005091595,0.00006564947,0.0001381107,0.00009372317,0.0003579521,0.00008952645,0.001765174,0.00002163767,0.0002141116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002049268,0.00003677601,0.0001111698,0.0002322793,0.0003415267,0.000527914,0.0002280237,0.000417519,0.000002523955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000254723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001121927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002268112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009075872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970577,0.0005191089,0.0005521976,0.00008427042,0.001572665,0.0002140909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968446,0.001986112,0.0006277148,0.0001276084,0.0003505722,0.00006338525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007713581,0.0008267563,0.2544147,0.00005294472,0.0005463035,0.0007605025,0.1636065,0.002007973,0.005220947,0.3468995,0.08065853,0.1372918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008646782,0.0008391315,0.04818869,0.0008857952,0.00004786903,0.0001231939,0.06830055,0.00009700289,0.002292087,0.03618445,0.8419053,0.0002712526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8193268,0.02240539,0.00009402185,0.1379715,0.003479937,0.0005576464,0.00001510592,0.00001130206,0.01613835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973862,0.001288147,0.00003516667,0.000488762,0.0002423776,0.00001064966,2.936586e-7,0.00000448381,0.000543919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7612467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3428722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225482477","doi":"10.1177/1365712715613485","title":"Confessions to Mr Big","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Scrutiny; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Common law; Political science; High Court; History","authors":[{"name":"Brendon Murphy","is_ca":false},{"name":"John Anderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3759581543813643,"gpt":0.4723487127284619,"spread":0.09639055834709764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00136577,0.00008479744,0.0001358608,0.0002150228,0.00003729506,0.00004763582,0.0008787813,0.00005441948,0.001460213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000881076,0.00004732526,0.00009855343,0.0001580529,0.00009858517,0.0001415142,0.00008222368,0.000274426,0.0009634816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008416798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001258657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002323208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002053748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985349,0.0001588898,0.0004357822,0.0001211345,0.0006087507,0.000140597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980468,0.0002024531,0.0003181545,0.0002299029,0.001014396,0.0001883072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001925919,0.0002496132,0.002725215,0.000001301222,0.0003189852,0.0001840884,0.006592633,0.0001457234,0.003445431,0.01193916,0.73729,0.235182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001904768,0.001279086,0.01801885,0.0003474406,0.0000539282,0.004625852,0.004054555,0.00004135786,0.001969153,0.01107729,0.9563924,0.0002352805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5908178,0.001538537,0.05171985,0.2280705,0.07041447,0.0004953015,0.00001040964,0.00006404617,0.0568691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981208,0.00001597428,0.0002973722,0.005849455,0.001423668,0.000009445039,3.257365e-7,0.000009193011,0.01118653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3903902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007912515","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.106","title":"The Common Enterprise Exception to the Hearsay Rule","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Principal (computer security); Common law; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Agency (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Philosophy; Computer security; Data mining","authors":[{"name":"Keith Spencer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1040325825963491,"gpt":0.4238262595036901,"spread":0.319793676907341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01034871,0.00008486416,0.0001022143,0.00005419117,0.0007958731,0.0003784309,0.00229503,0.00003434565,0.00009074559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002074467,0.00003569558,0.0001398956,0.0001728378,0.0003079853,0.0005382005,0.0001565635,0.0003129382,0.00008087162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002507924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001895201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009740572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006538269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973178,0.0002752244,0.0004706698,0.00009646285,0.001578506,0.0002613338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996593,0.002026583,0.0003563316,0.0002061172,0.0007091268,0.0001088565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002446491,0.0001860933,0.01572219,0.000009188714,0.0002024469,0.0001249074,0.05351739,0.0005880776,0.003928334,0.03692634,0.115513,0.7708355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001625424,0.0002340146,0.02918228,0.0007217639,0.00005487364,0.0001482123,0.007806689,0.00003340403,0.00213379,0.01933846,0.9400357,0.0001482463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.45279,0.003023358,0.006900095,0.5299838,0.003740198,0.0004237899,0.000001836351,0.00001605504,0.003120952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993754,0.0007050676,0.00009275081,0.002035933,0.001816132,0.000004453788,1.338385e-7,0.000005815346,0.001585679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8245227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6121293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124354858","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.1.308","title":"Weaknesses of Adjudication in the Face of Secret Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Secrecy; Acknowledgement; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Confidentiality; Law and economics; Strengths and weaknesses; Masking (illustration); Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Gus Van Harten","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1972302026298373,"gpt":0.4376579170917017,"spread":0.2404277144618644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005524294,0.00008373532,0.0001953568,0.0001181693,0.00008649597,0.00006025268,0.002303954,0.000045084,0.00007296402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005578804,0.00004499115,0.0001234442,0.0003464691,0.0003544725,0.00112894,0.00004717161,0.000231551,0.000002844273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009545051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004514403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000829306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005500329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969513,0.000412688,0.0006886758,0.0001030954,0.001697808,0.0001464787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957744,0.002005785,0.000952488,0.0001991364,0.001030396,0.00003780283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00446281,0.001636948,0.07643048,0.0002708592,0.0003257757,0.0001826691,0.2843979,0.005108954,0.1122733,0.2132139,0.02163531,0.2800611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001640302,0.003983005,0.511488,0.03887073,0.0006086464,0.0006822677,0.1084428,0.0008036491,0.09269403,0.2014543,0.03832798,0.001004283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7734457,0.009696345,0.002233063,0.2124642,0.0005369163,0.0003874858,0.000002780453,0.000006243077,0.001227224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962984,0.002697502,0.0001943346,0.0004532273,0.0002653423,0.000002843525,1.871126e-7,0.00000271472,0.00008547427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4350575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6678752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914773908","doi":"10.1177/1365712718824123","title":"The ‘Corroborative Rule’ from a comparative and critical perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Convict; Mistake; Law; Jury; Statute; Reasonable doubt; Order (exchange); Common law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Guy Ben-David","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1636282324494962,"gpt":0.4585632105028251,"spread":0.2949349780533289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001663054,0.00008621127,0.0001554536,0.00003315173,0.0003892073,0.0003731404,0.0009759626,0.00003344294,0.0001554031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002958928,0.00004177501,0.0000798906,0.0000900613,0.000822857,0.0009073557,0.000113089,0.000309029,0.00004277634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002011088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003505197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001557771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001070035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981073,0.0003544741,0.0002804254,0.0001293787,0.0009694141,0.0001590329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925281,0.005296485,0.0002526216,0.0001091068,0.001734747,0.00007891936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001918969,0.0001318499,0.01109344,0.000006604792,0.0003887849,0.00006849509,0.1865951,0.00008876293,0.002886758,0.7779797,0.01074401,0.008097502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006795735,0.0007965811,0.02350653,0.002005009,0.0002090018,0.0001257246,0.3845546,0.0005282162,0.003588568,0.5058721,0.07772271,0.0004113668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6333557,0.01162729,0.0006534419,0.3440513,0.002302905,0.0003651725,0.000009554744,0.00001097845,0.007623689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975303,0.0006236015,0.0002415235,0.0003977121,0.0006234543,0.00000371225,1.245383e-7,0.000003482336,0.0005760934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3641746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3598202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132652996","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.3.157","title":"Expert Evidence of Delay in Complaint in Childhood Sexual Abuse Prosecutions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Counterintuitive; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Sexual assault; Mythology; Affect (linguistics); Criminology; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Political science; Law; History; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Penney Lewis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08593711193608469,"gpt":0.3764056797921512,"spread":0.2904685678560666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001157518,0.0001327791,0.0002492448,0.0003299256,0.00003154033,0.00003599496,0.001024983,0.00006098359,0.0002594028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002359259,0.00008579918,0.0001004262,0.0002546461,0.0001326921,0.0004318398,0.00006070529,0.0004338504,0.00002100757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001530964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001322881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001087098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001943534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978387,0.0001886758,0.0009565828,0.0001753041,0.0006387198,0.0002020449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981833,0.0007038653,0.0005258003,0.0002388813,0.0003118071,0.0000363789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007097928,0.01043225,0.6595432,0.00008580474,0.0009968809,0.003128201,0.1554837,0.01311992,0.02910892,0.05312397,0.01652757,0.05135158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002723448,0.0007466312,0.9745635,0.005668105,0.00003943904,0.00208595,0.002942076,0.0002008887,0.004647658,0.004610343,0.001475101,0.0002968203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869962,0.00641895,0.000281715,0.005001956,0.0005837672,0.0002691391,0.000003650421,0.000005785278,0.0004388687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987319,0.0001854339,0.0002238458,0.0003128237,0.0004179537,0.00001717919,9.484125e-7,0.00001082411,0.00009911495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3150203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3498789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166165129","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2010.14.4.361","title":"Doubting What the Elders Have to Say: A Critical Examination of Canadian Judicial Treatment of Aboriginal Oral History Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Oral history; Notice; Law; Mandate; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Rules of evidence; Judicial review; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Common law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"David Milward","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2006508127194054,"gpt":0.4318830265874217,"spread":0.2312322138680164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003883134,0.0001263894,0.0002366772,0.0003453821,0.0002243463,0.0001382561,0.001305971,0.00007157836,0.0002944976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004802908,0.00007409984,0.0001659124,0.0002332183,0.0007996398,0.001600787,0.00003664668,0.0002704628,0.000006087587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008831605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002331205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.135381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3429534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997169,0.0003192989,0.000607924,0.0001542949,0.001478908,0.0002705939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949889,0.002231904,0.0004809237,0.0002017641,0.001882219,0.0002143098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001982638,0.0006359358,0.0132334,0.00009288182,0.0004231268,0.0002938438,0.2639153,0.0004673163,0.05691799,0.158937,0.01276061,0.49034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001277738,0.004900917,0.05831066,0.0131077,0.001034364,0.0005423034,0.07355303,0.0005566609,0.04418619,0.01238487,0.7891505,0.0009950147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7945558,0.004397077,0.0003018198,0.1942216,0.004626565,0.0004670103,0.000004809601,0.000007204389,0.001418075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963145,0.001474824,0.0004889459,0.0005119825,0.0009442363,0.00001035377,2.428739e-7,0.000007394865,0.0002474885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.77639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8703766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084963802","doi":"10.1350/ijep.10.4.280","title":"Without Fear or Favour? Trends and Possibilities in the Canadian Approach to Expert Human Behaviour Evidence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Scientific evidence; Political science; Relevance (law); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Emma Cunliffe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.221372687988687,"gpt":0.4527667752722754,"spread":0.2313940872835884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004668884,0.0001210776,0.0001711739,0.0003873973,0.0004510037,0.0007407045,0.002050151,0.00005935156,0.00007866348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002098853,0.00005977058,0.00006319647,0.0004355764,0.0003140488,0.0009381112,0.0000796013,0.000303045,0.000003547445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004093134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009019488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.148508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5165382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970645,0.0003606207,0.0004889722,0.0001867729,0.001634447,0.0002647208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979748,0.0008061993,0.0002785576,0.0001837843,0.0006416969,0.0001149603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001509628,0.0007662597,0.3836348,0.00004724244,0.0001472883,0.0005312892,0.3310824,0.001284177,0.001035012,0.05493966,0.06685647,0.1581658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001002541,0.0009267733,0.8553128,0.004808109,0.0001073632,0.0009500736,0.05130632,0.0001157262,0.0006602264,0.04476157,0.0391934,0.0008551516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9292521,0.002471902,0.0001973857,0.0627514,0.0003910341,0.0003202189,0.000004040817,0.00001157468,0.004600336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942497,0.00007640685,0.0007852088,0.001071929,0.0005990216,0.00001716928,3.092872e-7,0.000008384406,0.00319189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.471678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8571621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966623002","doi":"10.1350/ijep.9.2.73.64809","title":"The Contextualised Court: Litigating ‘Culture’ in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Multiculturalism; Legal culture; Law; Contextualism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Cultural issues; High Court; Cultural diversity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","authors":[{"name":"Robert J. Currie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06074616941425492,"gpt":0.3488412649417584,"spread":0.2880950955275035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002362339,0.00006885105,0.00009877144,0.000005521532,0.0004116484,0.0001863251,0.001350676,0.00003740121,0.00008601711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001682984,0.00003182007,0.00008451255,0.0001171191,0.000221891,0.000494545,0.00004866514,0.0003776294,0.000003337238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008939597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001611841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1674878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8724051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978724,0.0002281604,0.0003907888,0.0000682449,0.001252517,0.0001879311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997977,0.0007684542,0.0003857563,0.00007947408,0.0007267988,0.00006250801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003829631,0.0001336127,0.01746926,0.00001196693,0.0004746939,0.0001291342,0.1985203,0.003099759,0.001029217,0.1065139,0.4379826,0.2342526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040859,0.00002862346,0.002538331,0.0005314022,0.00002021498,0.00004242964,0.05565739,0.0001571316,0.000968932,0.007169513,0.9323421,0.0001353677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2925365,0.01806801,0.00006525426,0.6701642,0.002903558,0.0005118,0.000009215591,0.00001322131,0.01572823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918593,0.001738327,0.00009357764,0.002628183,0.001402642,0.000006931599,2.335748e-7,0.000003550776,0.002267286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7049173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.838056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161670791","doi":"10.1177/13657127211011236","title":"The exclusion of prison informant evidence for unreliability in New Zealand","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Gatekeeping; Jury; Suspect; Supreme court; Deference; Criminology; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Anna High","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1801210453341474,"gpt":0.4501539560224675,"spread":0.2700329106883201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002678232,0.00008748916,0.0001782086,0.00009748607,0.000056935,0.00004251708,0.0007675228,0.00006729017,0.0003737568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002951867,0.00004576077,0.0001615446,0.0001814947,0.0001496481,0.0003027782,0.0001044915,0.0002846451,0.00001539863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009725316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003565287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007004555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002740152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981915,0.0001864901,0.0008378841,0.0001338845,0.0004959717,0.0001543017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960808,0.001967434,0.0006823456,0.0002939345,0.0009238803,0.00005160608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01258262,0.0004904738,0.06369124,0.00003571984,0.0004348848,0.00007097708,0.01174175,0.000503209,0.01118035,0.008168349,0.1816218,0.7094786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005524078,0.00213857,0.5057414,0.003151265,0.0001228339,0.002459664,0.00418641,0.0006624629,0.01849166,0.05807062,0.3990706,0.00038036],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.880636,0.006721839,0.01216618,0.08790822,0.01088096,0.0006138859,0.00000536156,0.0000121651,0.001055381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917823,0.0007483836,0.000363303,0.0006440374,0.0004262291,0.00001055034,6.009992e-7,0.000007084057,0.006017532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7090982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4092375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121600658","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.75","title":"Improperly Obtained Evidence in the Commonwealth: Lessons for England and Wales?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; English law; Jurisdiction; Law; Convention; Scots law; Common law; Conformity; Legislation; Political science; Position (finance); High Court; Human rights; Sources of law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Andrew L‐T Choo","is_ca":false},{"name":"Susan Nash","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3150991231661772,"gpt":0.4679963539616306,"spread":0.1528972307954534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01607164,0.0001041041,0.0001685777,0.0001046839,0.000349814,0.0002581742,0.001657841,0.00005515336,0.00001764286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006129827,0.00005197944,0.00009370935,0.0001779672,0.0003748567,0.0009777576,0.00007571044,0.000331142,0.00000231384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001696078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003591473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001506743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01081223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976391,0.0003065774,0.0005411144,0.0001394962,0.001080122,0.0002936162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225,0.006325942,0.0004148552,0.0001505269,0.0007717578,0.00008698121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005938184,0.0004018086,0.04680026,0.0001670382,0.0001853847,0.0003882072,0.2084664,0.0001176502,0.006370736,0.1463701,0.009133078,0.5756611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003696319,0.003306191,0.2279497,0.01289161,0.000419836,0.001512903,0.08100495,0.0006127597,0.004100678,0.1020156,0.5614082,0.001081204],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6263308,0.00712854,0.002829921,0.3618782,0.0008000954,0.0006245192,0.000003180006,0.000008195746,0.0003965527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955695,0.001701671,0.0003978003,0.001167263,0.0009524541,0.00001154124,2.20918e-7,0.000006092081,0.0001934724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5745799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7338418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753352173","doi":"10.1177/1365712717725536","title":"The diverging dictionaries of science and law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Notice; Scientific evidence; Phenomenon; Scientific terminology; Scientific literature; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Helena Likwornik","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jason Chin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Maya Bielinski","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1917086831110509,"gpt":0.4467994862173185,"spread":0.2550908031062676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00651296,0.00005091149,0.00008306832,0.00004334551,0.003620137,0.0007395906,0.002909881,0.00002036999,0.00002443585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009926088,0.00002542278,0.00004700682,0.00007166599,0.01154489,0.001800103,0.0003303588,0.0001522617,0.000002683363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001187153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005300674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001710697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00169522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976543,0.00007814871,0.0003192572,0.00008157382,0.001718663,0.0001480992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956722,0.001001187,0.0007529054,0.0002058369,0.002312103,0.00005580911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008934907,0.00001661971,0.006138552,0.000001716504,0.00003571811,0.000005793364,0.008144126,0.00004708629,0.002066154,0.9456375,0.0004284735,0.03738894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002217419,0.0002923029,0.02463703,0.001451871,0.00009178345,0.0001099538,0.02865591,0.0008116365,0.08957461,0.6180168,0.2358419,0.0002944026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6981834,0.003123119,0.001368036,0.2544953,0.007862703,0.000391361,0.00000414797,0.0000151995,0.03455672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982014,0.0007219363,0.000116518,0.0001607236,0.0004897533,0.000001585275,1.257435e-8,0.000002545056,0.000305508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3276206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887570016","doi":"10.1177/1365712718787523","title":"Social science and humanities evidence in <i>Charter</i> litigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Digital humanities; Law; Art","authors":[{"name":"Jocelyn Downie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3473604263806609,"gpt":0.5234327946804664,"spread":0.1760723682998055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009436835,0.00007807812,0.0001542991,0.0001730898,0.0004634449,0.00007765475,0.0008592203,0.00005142278,0.0003184948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01716059,0.00004516709,0.00002988353,0.0002193157,0.001140606,0.001988457,0.0002111262,0.0005792982,0.00003763495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002659308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008847253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001256345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000106505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971575,0.0003918431,0.000647307,0.000139261,0.001439172,0.000224929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939104,0.002518597,0.0005825357,0.0001177206,0.002807339,0.0000634501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003761207,0.0005093171,0.3048225,0.0006640973,0.0001828272,0.0001377947,0.3126708,0.000003630776,0.06528212,0.1263426,0.07439002,0.111233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002871986,0.002809274,0.5068461,0.03310429,0.0001975895,0.0003093033,0.06274467,0.001016942,0.0171193,0.1099963,0.2622017,0.0007825318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8552361,0.0006387475,0.0001316328,0.1405398,0.001176206,0.0002704299,8.966606e-7,0.000007793633,0.001998432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992539,0.0002278285,0.000119037,0.004433319,0.002325839,0.00001176974,1.100385e-7,0.000004638328,0.0003384908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2499262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225487473","doi":"10.1177/1365712715613479","title":"The expert witness’s duty of impartiality in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Supreme court; Duty; Law; Expert witness; Political science; Trial court; Prejudice (legal term); Witness","authors":[{"name":"Chris Hunt","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lorne Neudorf","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3275671409319637,"gpt":0.5168705083783651,"spread":0.1893033674464014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006835711,0.00006846031,0.0001892679,0.00003010588,0.00009879156,0.0000107955,0.0009885267,0.00003882516,0.0001739256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01516983,0.0000293559,0.00004592415,0.00009319625,0.0001352821,0.0002995989,0.0001383856,0.0006390442,0.000004737049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006530075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004898385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5810506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6111103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966856,0.00085181,0.0009436493,0.00007136197,0.001265775,0.0001817761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930966,0.004381434,0.0008660671,0.0002075388,0.001328781,0.0001195406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004239546,0.0002651806,0.7639708,0.0001030635,0.0002541041,0.000120229,0.01931385,0.0003751759,0.0005577756,0.006891617,0.1558759,0.04803279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003182564,0.0005412743,0.3164576,0.005384669,0.00009064619,0.0001204612,0.09088451,0.001146932,0.004012163,0.03509154,0.5427296,0.0003579899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7804182,0.002129621,0.0001426695,0.2143737,0.002167808,0.0002629951,0.0000021263,0.000002313739,0.0005005696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976208,0.000283001,0.00004571482,0.001214779,0.0005831437,0.00001946565,2.008426e-7,0.000004074061,0.000228821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4475132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045457203","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.2.104","title":"Delayed Complaints in Childhood Sexual Abuse Prosecutions—A Comparative Evaluation of Admissibility Determinations and Judicial Warnings","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Jury; Law; Political science; Legislature; Criminology; Sexual assault; Sexual abuse; Psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Penney Lewis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1465600818705441,"gpt":0.4188097431467664,"spread":0.2722496612762223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00233151,0.0001100181,0.0002195515,0.0002109226,0.00007040893,0.00003495355,0.0004021923,0.00005045709,0.0002073508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003290468,0.00007469593,0.00005970361,0.0001620441,0.0001668047,0.0003150171,0.00003790037,0.0002889295,0.000005839819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001330343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001949855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003284208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009306274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977612,0.0003674675,0.0007420657,0.0001634161,0.0008429231,0.0001229127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975557,0.0005039765,0.0006888306,0.0001457992,0.00106785,0.00003778865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006122145,0.007075823,0.4921317,0.00005220097,0.001904662,0.0001648363,0.3146668,0.006737932,0.01146747,0.01527223,0.005008071,0.1393961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002098114,0.0003412853,0.9839864,0.0003407213,0.0001374645,0.0003156197,0.001712123,0.001496898,0.001415163,0.007953836,0.00009611031,0.0001062099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965953,0.0009224863,0.0002232001,0.001020548,0.0003116956,0.0004083771,0.00001246163,0.000004745646,0.0005011901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994606,0.00001273308,0.0001558407,0.00006564052,0.0002436589,0.0000158303,0.000004863889,0.000005648703,0.00003519882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4918547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3046011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061777057","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.1.75","title":"Judicial Independence and Anti-Terrorism Legislation in Canada: Blurring the Investigative and Judicial Functions: <i>Re an Application under s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial discretion; Criminal code; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Terrorism; Penal code; Code (set theory); Judicial activism; Criminal law; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Byron Sheldrick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08279000444014531,"gpt":0.331445608750582,"spread":0.2486556043104367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00229482,0.0001027009,0.0001535471,0.00006276739,0.0003830505,0.00009987576,0.0007215595,0.00004965899,0.000009568556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006531192,0.00005735589,0.0000401638,0.000209757,0.0007601729,0.0009002747,0.0001093302,0.0003605306,3.363035e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003904736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001783291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.622938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.915563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974622,0.00031194,0.0004916287,0.0001553157,0.001421755,0.0001572261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979951,0.0005244218,0.0006272547,0.0001316273,0.0006705113,0.00005104395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001058039,0.0003463824,0.6874104,0.00008975546,0.0002170474,0.00005387206,0.05831274,0.02121472,0.03100943,0.1412437,0.004975509,0.05406843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005396287,0.0001483735,0.8796147,0.001300933,0.000215369,0.0001346327,0.03597037,0.001974637,0.004041961,0.07299607,0.002782633,0.0002807612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587672,0.0008583646,0.0007540253,0.03862791,0.0004448124,0.0002669338,0.000005670059,0.000003200126,0.0002718935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986992,0.0001643622,0.00004552602,0.0004850442,0.0005644509,0.00000868374,5.112967e-7,0.00000531072,0.00002686271],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.292625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3795729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094858247","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.4.329","title":"Reasonable Doubt in Credibility Contests: Sexual Assault and Sexual Equality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Credibility; Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Christine Lesley Boyle","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1403326277753384,"gpt":0.410591200654629,"spread":0.2702585728792906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006205503,0.00009056502,0.0001706575,0.00001416154,0.0001869257,0.0001821751,0.0008103005,0.0001051877,0.00008742318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002515898,0.00005382829,0.00005424667,0.0001477832,0.0003365742,0.000944007,0.00005478838,0.0004634763,0.000002704266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002509109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000350322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009247049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001547895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976273,0.0003630613,0.0004283872,0.000149588,0.001239484,0.0001921408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981301,0.0005191428,0.0003377315,0.0001171671,0.0008061937,0.00008964795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00272213,0.001807038,0.2667227,0.00007112516,0.0004789988,0.0002863562,0.2413787,0.0005536565,0.01408276,0.1895348,0.06874443,0.2136173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003583064,0.002187154,0.3243366,0.002099379,0.0001833938,0.0004580334,0.1504968,0.0005998578,0.002921099,0.3517058,0.1603115,0.001117343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9229318,0.002479623,0.0001140158,0.07104459,0.000418768,0.0001897214,0.00000465029,0.00001261576,0.002804155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958198,0.0003596633,0.0002223538,0.001375382,0.0007285321,0.000002137191,5.43602e-7,0.000002708843,0.001488844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3011947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209528132","doi":"","title":"Doubting what the Elders have to say","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Law; Mandate; Objectivity (philosophy); Supreme court; Sovereignty; Oral history; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Milward","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1754112075490245,"gpt":0.4751415685260832,"spread":0.2997303609770587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004799584,0.00005826388,0.00006570255,0.00009112313,0.0004463197,0.0012056,0.001439551,0.00003545353,0.0006902812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009247792,0.00002927622,0.00006897324,0.0002326423,0.0001789197,0.002775607,0.00006428979,0.0007250585,0.00005374151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000822182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009124151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007879874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002726991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983174,0.0001677234,0.0003314594,0.00007371416,0.0009761052,0.0001335919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962169,0.001606442,0.0004308172,0.0001486432,0.001522529,0.00007469668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002994587,0.0002265307,0.006385395,0.000005163965,0.0002712054,0.00002138118,0.2058366,0.0003941318,0.01714898,0.2803539,0.1362935,0.3527638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009485037,0.0000378022,0.00142221,0.0001604583,0.00002246758,0.00005743525,0.03108346,0.0000218585,0.002002342,0.01025265,0.9547641,0.00008033209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08978157,0.0001865402,0.0006934897,0.8972232,0.005681399,0.0001738487,4.045768e-7,0.000007085728,0.006252425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830831,0.0001716528,0.0005260544,0.01147066,0.002218944,0.000007371869,1.845068e-7,0.000004842039,0.002517164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8933015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239874989","doi":"10.1177/1365712718765194","title":"Case commentaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1983410877336306,"gpt":0.4309837070251528,"spread":0.2326426192915222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001210829,0.0000436159,0.00006894024,0.00004209697,0.0006140607,0.0001269112,0.0004727773,0.00001873988,0.0003533738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001006273,0.00002244757,0.00007064715,0.0000907782,0.0006556506,0.0004476932,0.00008312369,0.0001040442,0.00001430808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001177362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001900126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001193048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003831734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989505,0.00009891265,0.0002194418,0.00004731927,0.000582881,0.0001009133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981209,0.0004860388,0.0002156866,0.00006944326,0.001063929,0.00004396901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006731609,0.0002851132,0.01385936,0.00001001271,0.001038007,0.003954201,0.1881434,0.00008827524,0.0005968586,0.2207879,0.4721202,0.09844343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002723239,0.0002488312,0.0008876409,0.0002218835,0.00006628003,0.002997333,0.01398451,0.00005176762,0.0009560551,0.0124186,0.9677861,0.0001086725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4009228,0.001924555,0.00171725,0.5706515,0.006129995,0.0002721948,0.000006556753,0.0000189408,0.01835615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945319,0.0001340922,0.0002761518,0.001356114,0.002616062,0.000001363233,9.856356e-8,0.000002652016,0.001081596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.593609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.472292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080502037","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.3.213","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Khelawon</i> —Continuing Reform of the Law of Hearsay in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Dale E. Ives","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08338161060927719,"gpt":0.3579884174372023,"spread":0.2746068068279252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007877673,0.0001309471,0.0003251559,0.00008537003,0.0000967542,0.00005521377,0.002227916,0.00006443983,0.0001166751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000754266,0.00007135579,0.0002197886,0.0003945266,0.000581024,0.0006145123,0.000203334,0.0004256528,0.00000165009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001337006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001590801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8009169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9481195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951418,0.0003490062,0.00151333,0.0001216549,0.002588564,0.0002856229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957671,0.00082131,0.001807709,0.0002247204,0.001292761,0.00008639906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001639236,0.0006123591,0.04223382,0.0002255833,0.0005171093,0.0001210973,0.07840832,0.0007020473,0.008259793,0.7860712,0.003456051,0.07775335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004525687,0.0007872662,0.3235819,0.03100605,0.0005835588,0.0002800286,0.1823951,0.0002451024,0.2649916,0.06724499,0.123036,0.00132272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9160594,0.001216983,0.00007366983,0.04437939,0.003149366,0.0003271126,0.00001659042,0.000002088643,0.03477544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974658,0.0002829455,0.00004310042,0.001280385,0.0003027471,0.00000118423,1.878725e-7,0.0000078014,0.0006158431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7188262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4140059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408557619","doi":"10.1177/13657127251326782","title":"Beliefs about deception in Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Wilcoxson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vincent Denault","is_ca":true},{"name":"Matthew Browne","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nathan Brooks","is_ca":false},{"name":"Paul Duckett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1490327404971154,"gpt":0.4655581450462823,"spread":0.3165254045491669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001205385,0.00009114302,0.0001475552,0.0004039577,0.0000317977,0.00004659539,0.0007550347,0.00008429469,0.002976837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003233841,0.0000578817,0.0001151985,0.0002624854,0.0001327727,0.0002243385,0.00004889192,0.0003934758,0.0002465907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001356948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005772979,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007095596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001143823,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985996,0.0001643032,0.0006006884,0.0001374231,0.0003507618,0.0001471801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988441,0.0002135906,0.0003366936,0.0001888259,0.0003819867,0.0000347638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004099253,0.0009622668,0.06767893,0.00001833221,0.0008521028,0.0003093925,0.006470359,0.0005372777,0.01207085,0.06232559,0.3754175,0.4692582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002466826,0.0004320773,0.8247442,0.001213167,0.00005301467,0.0009762538,0.001053776,0.00005341528,0.002013232,0.0374111,0.1293699,0.0002130299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9122011,0.001708565,0.01082517,0.03902074,0.02097708,0.0003078478,0.000003409682,0.00002372945,0.01493238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821209,0.0001012549,0.0001375526,0.001750729,0.0003902886,0.00001126024,5.271343e-7,0.00000497972,0.01548257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7570652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032902571","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.447","title":"Judging, Fast and Slow: Using Decision-Making Theory to Explore Judicial Fact Determination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Emma Cunliffe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.118251817099726,"gpt":0.3252852330692548,"spread":0.2070334159695288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00315063,0.0001122017,0.0003314906,0.0003022689,0.000136865,0.0002489531,0.0006854656,0.00005617427,0.00008038559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002073535,0.00009878565,0.000120014,0.00008280345,0.00009096052,0.000755066,0.0001426512,0.0001565456,0.00003873256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002218218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004185506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006269352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003058308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984748,0.00005545334,0.0009391918,0.0002076846,0.0001517245,0.0001711529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978442,0.000644302,0.001053317,0.0001640794,0.0002168273,0.00007729409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001123616,0.0001553323,0.11815,0.00004547924,0.0004250468,0.00003929117,0.01152301,0.007866719,0.001019404,0.2189344,0.001380206,0.6393375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006775257,0.0003448989,0.02415179,0.00191124,0.00003705424,0.0002881917,0.0006435457,0.02602486,0.0005369757,0.9385766,0.00637843,0.0004289258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7117842,0.0007677656,0.2826646,0.001389333,0.002096626,0.00016405,0.0000069141,0.00000683181,0.001119749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957538,0.0001051113,0.001994814,0.0007015995,0.001390275,0.000003836244,3.00971e-7,0.00001743382,0.00003282449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7196422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4028362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776141614","doi":"10.1177/1365712717746420","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Bradshaw</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Supreme court; Reliability (semiconductor); Test (biology); Law; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Chris Hunt","is_ca":true},{"name":"Micah B. Rankin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.268432360058455,"gpt":0.458226880767542,"spread":0.189794520709087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003210801,0.00007907124,0.0001318676,0.00004456558,0.000881445,0.0007308795,0.003961404,0.0000400237,0.0002268863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004778176,0.00004530228,0.0001521382,0.00003546655,0.0005701418,0.001872109,0.0001952328,0.0002425607,0.00004923914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001158336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004125628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001021661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008382899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978817,0.0001191034,0.0003426481,0.00009889013,0.001372132,0.0001855828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973733,0.0005005589,0.0007932623,0.0003092186,0.0009230031,0.0001006005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001710325,0.0003941636,0.05293356,0.00004050033,0.0005433781,0.0009307323,0.03183765,0.0001749079,0.01099556,0.2241545,0.3173275,0.3589572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003321978,0.0001570634,0.008550142,0.001272836,0.00008196696,0.000189831,0.001832398,0.00002580233,0.004963486,0.03052011,0.9518737,0.0002005002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1747624,0.003639395,0.001182366,0.764001,0.008059603,0.0003146346,0.000004308083,0.00002621332,0.0480102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930639,0.001053552,0.0002439303,0.001152123,0.002090655,0.000002343406,8.152361e-8,0.000005737471,0.002387648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8183016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013505516","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.11.1.49","title":"Filling in the Blanks for Litigation Privilege: <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Blank; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Privilege (computing); Engineering; Mechanical engineering","authors":[{"name":"Dale E. Ives","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stephen G. A. Pitel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0961047505531322,"gpt":0.3825391091228876,"spread":0.2864343585697554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005758525,0.00006413185,0.0001332708,0.00005361189,0.0001425644,0.00008326137,0.0009860741,0.00004023674,0.00001626842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002280595,0.00003403958,0.0000702717,0.0001658772,0.0001219761,0.0004033691,0.00002552935,0.0001744513,4.818927e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000144578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009474558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04287466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2433392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979084,0.0001093177,0.0005938371,0.00007277587,0.001151598,0.0001641073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961708,0.002206648,0.0006390106,0.00007789756,0.0008697779,0.00003586547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005636068,0.001051141,0.05524099,0.001301346,0.0008306347,0.0004469172,0.2425598,0.003805065,0.017325,0.344851,0.1993789,0.1275731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001921549,0.0008822672,0.01166292,0.00730096,0.000353638,0.0001764207,0.05880964,0.0003549276,0.03033319,0.05167398,0.8359553,0.0005752682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7388827,0.006312474,0.02352893,0.1914476,0.009338157,0.002045784,0.00003873836,0.00001556316,0.02839009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996471,0.0001035243,0.0001518463,0.001577582,0.001523785,0.000004744318,5.527058e-7,0.000004190146,0.000162733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6365763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.963499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243586645","doi":"10.1177/1365712719874633","title":"Noticeboard","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1154802471381608,"gpt":0.3659320149913201,"spread":0.2504517678531593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002396669,0.0001197579,0.0001854993,0.0001767746,0.000032858,0.0001491276,0.002211548,0.00003350845,0.001183045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001354952,0.00006245195,0.0001892294,0.0001474726,0.00008443848,0.001119356,0.0001782271,0.0003817358,0.003826302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002435986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002523101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001764577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008917907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972445,0.0001280479,0.0005621956,0.0001189013,0.001772517,0.0001738289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967119,0.000664762,0.0008173331,0.0002680692,0.001468599,0.0000693046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007705905,0.0007447788,0.1615138,0.00006944935,0.002442256,0.0006090043,0.004656313,0.01727687,0.5984826,0.01830979,0.1363517,0.05183741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008195362,0.003283326,0.1555259,0.01185029,0.0007691334,0.01038659,0.002286118,0.009704114,0.3566894,0.05023615,0.3893175,0.001756164],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705698,0.001145254,0.000496329,0.02125152,0.003048755,0.0002735732,0.000005433633,0.00002040761,0.003188946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960706,0.00004595962,0.0006173388,0.0007918604,0.0007717279,0.000002284408,3.774444e-7,0.00002674216,0.00167306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2529657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338304353","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.448","title":"Hearsay by Implication: <i>R</i> v <i>Baldree</i>","year":2014,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Philosophy; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Chris Hunt","is_ca":true},{"name":"Micah B. Rankin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0907127877805838,"gpt":0.3793831550748223,"spread":0.2886703672942385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006904786,0.0002574403,0.0003854451,0.00009111891,0.0004705635,0.0006041375,0.003988841,0.0001402406,0.0006933303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002971402,0.0001605433,0.0003614017,0.000325242,0.0007054365,0.001510133,0.000274391,0.0006449015,0.0002830603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003422248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005839387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008607164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001628238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946864,0.0006766608,0.001127643,0.0003094429,0.002755423,0.0004444074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938444,0.002090164,0.001411256,0.0004213963,0.001960522,0.0002722736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006051832,0.0003255086,0.002518159,0.00004708611,0.0003308774,0.00002909509,0.008265669,0.000133381,0.0206361,0.02356842,0.8466197,0.09692078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003709971,0.0004970258,0.001029108,0.001660991,0.0001949032,0.0002803961,0.001140459,0.0001163604,0.006921395,0.00960716,0.9778745,0.0003067106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07192796,0.0233703,0.007037616,0.8778459,0.008207883,0.0006688153,0.00003191642,0.00003831943,0.01087129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825442,0.004598822,0.0002440477,0.004811739,0.003898087,0.000007405371,0.000001545834,0.00002094652,0.003873145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7591481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000251237","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.3.212","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Henry</i> : A Welcome Retreat from an Overly Broad Interpretation of S. 13 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Dale E. Ives","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03020607224087154,"gpt":0.3113570938715569,"spread":0.2811510216306853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007730061,0.00009742848,0.0002351206,0.00006276724,0.0001972013,0.0000555327,0.0008617291,0.00005927055,0.00005879949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003679692,0.0000485027,0.0001317354,0.0001261784,0.0007505421,0.000650391,0.00006398821,0.0001676601,7.414035e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002133727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000209451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6498553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6572653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979908,0.0002248966,0.000555736,0.0001011451,0.0009962771,0.0001310816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975545,0.0003614814,0.0008694233,0.0001245273,0.001026002,0.00006407485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001662344,0.0006695493,0.5634736,0.0000972072,0.001760931,0.00003836304,0.3017876,0.001142304,0.06109194,0.02900723,0.01367542,0.02559348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001516337,0.0006196582,0.8788081,0.003461699,0.0003662402,0.00002915019,0.006798818,0.0007012108,0.03152927,0.06819762,0.007571637,0.0004002068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857649,0.001258765,0.00003230898,0.01096477,0.0005212949,0.0001947988,0.0000359224,0.00000265766,0.001224647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991523,0.00007306635,0.0001225296,0.0001337444,0.0003283768,0.000002302614,0.000001062257,0.00000413655,0.0001825011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3153345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3524763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018345762","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.4.322","title":"Litigation Privilege: Transient or Timeless? <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Adversarial system; Governor; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"James Goudkamp","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0981673817290953,"gpt":0.3851083503480055,"spread":0.2869409686189102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002266014,0.00007437906,0.0001322195,0.00004936357,0.0001551637,0.00006228191,0.0009763879,0.00003749028,0.0001721711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059176,0.00004291214,0.00008200528,0.0001749575,0.0001849636,0.0003837623,0.0000428208,0.0001871259,0.000003379177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002141333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001427836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01292013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1300231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977721,0.00007376545,0.0005933957,0.0000893366,0.001304481,0.000166914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974906,0.0007900377,0.0005808102,0.0001239485,0.0009205377,0.00009401897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005533434,0.001705138,0.0121986,0.0004084655,0.00123133,0.0005397224,0.07860518,0.002868362,0.06626744,0.4204589,0.1583715,0.2518119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006528276,0.0002423801,0.007214715,0.001090327,0.0002221206,0.0001009296,0.007015878,0.0001042047,0.04009714,0.003092636,0.9399147,0.0002521253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7450706,0.001445821,0.02634802,0.1921844,0.003622594,0.001004301,0.00005268447,0.00002547609,0.03024603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963046,0.0001800557,0.0004598742,0.001211207,0.0007723358,0.00000300525,8.391066e-7,0.000005669911,0.001062374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7815432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124416878","doi":"10.1177/1365712717690752","title":"Loosening the law’s bite: Law, fact, and expert evidence in <i>R</i> v <i>JA</i> and <i>R</i> v <i>NS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Framing (construction); Law; Face (sociological concept); Status quo; Hearsay; Political science; Sociology; History; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Dana Phillips","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2189871331869706,"gpt":0.4240047522478299,"spread":0.2050176190608593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005139844,0.0001828195,0.000266498,0.00005670565,0.001362819,0.001361243,0.002530581,0.00007637092,0.00002885416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00284609,0.0001006312,0.0001039562,0.00007821491,0.001986344,0.003383582,0.0004986426,0.0005099921,0.000005344966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001176502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002289501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0143076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971495,0.0003391588,0.0005746919,0.0002539622,0.00134844,0.0003343022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959784,0.002203714,0.0007628432,0.0003875589,0.0005203853,0.0001470671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003248906,0.0003996921,0.07729454,0.0001644063,0.0004463595,0.001267797,0.1408304,0.0001812259,0.03867705,0.5227394,0.02567953,0.1890706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001878235,0.0007111348,0.01628766,0.01759601,0.0002577682,0.001624514,0.0192358,0.0002802647,0.01887596,0.06355447,0.8585109,0.001187315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4799607,0.04633095,0.0002693279,0.4601116,0.002319722,0.0006837844,0.000006018369,0.00002681562,0.01029109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98264,0.01023516,0.0001975566,0.005680802,0.000848596,0.00001100123,1.072451e-7,0.00001169686,0.00037506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8328313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082028856","doi":"","title":"Social media-Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Gans","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3187710806736269,"gpt":0.4632453971916218,"spread":0.1444743165179949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002356837,0.00005917798,0.0001099783,0.00005763995,0.0002481285,0.00005064605,0.00114946,0.0000441561,0.0002751099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02404156,0.00002970229,0.00006276303,0.0001341523,0.0002586854,0.0004960169,0.00003968155,0.0001430036,0.0000105454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009980932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003629072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04590103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2517957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973187,0.0002803523,0.0003841892,0.00007357738,0.001756622,0.0001865674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906169,0.007462498,0.0005273603,0.00006771726,0.001221906,0.0001035819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001842139,0.00005798005,0.01720159,0.000006163502,0.00009267794,0.00002530717,0.03292861,0.000001545619,0.0004287398,0.02103661,0.07886099,0.8491756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005109177,0.00006274969,0.1014953,0.0008351182,0.00005843928,0.00003671511,0.00821648,0.000001663027,0.002800631,0.04076103,0.8449598,0.000261216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2980519,0.000736897,0.0002086651,0.6797245,0.01996302,0.0003478098,0.000003406042,0.00001066407,0.0009531529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902457,0.000384965,0.00006966251,0.0007186431,0.008399184,0.00003487328,1.09659e-7,0.000005796932,0.0001410643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8489144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240971876","doi":"10.1177/1365712719853154","title":"Case commentary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07591591282140106,"gpt":0.3452271423078668,"spread":0.2693112294864658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004280191,0.00006182912,0.0001258135,0.00007472732,0.00002592005,0.00002350641,0.0002691303,0.00002919274,0.0004631715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008960243,0.00002891306,0.0001244984,0.00005246437,0.00003676633,0.0002101327,0.00004755363,0.0003397476,0.000061213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007314508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007006257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002480975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000420886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990716,0.00002764409,0.0002895175,0.00005998797,0.0004760314,0.00007520689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991048,0.0001953758,0.0001974598,0.0001300304,0.0003199753,0.00005237574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01018913,0.002162758,0.2826818,0.0002193618,0.007843046,0.1015422,0.01022273,0.001341205,0.05823394,0.002209784,0.2985164,0.2248376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00920375,0.003116621,0.02636732,0.01123296,0.001055874,0.7590755,0.002113939,0.001273003,0.05960891,0.003288506,0.1232276,0.0004360072],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109963,0.001447953,0.00004014897,0.08589975,0.0008900726,0.0001403033,8.926891e-7,0.000004520834,0.0005800414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919593,0.0003125614,0.0001497137,0.006451682,0.000580092,6.103958e-7,7.78363e-7,0.000006508446,0.000538724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6575333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5071403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240803306","doi":"10.1177/1365712719893192","title":"Case commentary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Michael Plaxton","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07591591282140106,"gpt":0.3452271423078668,"spread":0.2693112294864658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004280191,0.00006182912,0.0001258135,0.00007472732,0.00002592005,0.00002350641,0.0002691303,0.00002919274,0.0004631715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008960243,0.00002891306,0.0001244984,0.00005246437,0.00003676633,0.0002101327,0.00004755363,0.0003397476,0.000061213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007314508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007006257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002480975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000420886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990716,0.00002764409,0.0002895175,0.00005998797,0.0004760314,0.00007520689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991048,0.0001953758,0.0001974598,0.0001300304,0.0003199753,0.00005237574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01018913,0.002162758,0.2826818,0.0002193618,0.007843046,0.1015422,0.01022273,0.001341205,0.05823394,0.002209784,0.2985164,0.2248376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00920375,0.003116621,0.02636732,0.01123296,0.001055874,0.7590755,0.002113939,0.001273003,0.05960891,0.003288506,0.1232276,0.0004360072],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109963,0.001447953,0.00004014897,0.08589975,0.0008900726,0.0001403033,8.926891e-7,0.000004520834,0.0005800414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919593,0.0003125614,0.0001497137,0.006451682,0.000580092,6.103958e-7,7.78363e-7,0.000006508446,0.000538724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6575333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5071403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}