{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":519,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":519,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"ad8795d286d8","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2559519262","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i3.3275","title":"Creating an Understanding of Data Literacy for a Data-driven Society","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":319,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Information literacy; Critical literacy; Foundation (evidence); Computer science; Data science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.689287066960147,"gpt":0.5287390662463747,"spread":0.1605480007137723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009339852,0.00008816059,0.0002669693,0.0000500576,0.0003196748,0.0000495113,0.002415479,0.00004149936,0.00001778749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008017112,0.00004571936,0.00004660494,0.00008068458,0.0001627048,0.001458835,0.0006133233,0.0002804103,6.487253e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006196035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001685738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001003883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008500281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981543,0.000587448,0.0008957701,0.00001252472,0.0002234729,0.0001264576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757535,0.02070811,0.001419511,0.001684842,0.0003848306,0.00004923908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002428131,0.0004723278,0.0002312177,0.001285074,0.0005907377,9.564665e-8,0.7465087,0.00003753665,0.0005341679,0.08481268,0.1108071,0.05447755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001391717,0.0003954912,0.00009529513,0.0005934903,0.0004442684,0.00008489177,0.5325388,0.01712813,0.0003072899,0.4420946,0.004760369,0.0001657356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.08304451,0.00001709822,0.9154582,0.0003750149,0.000141186,0.00012385,0.0004844145,0.00001076615,0.0003449436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2571183,0.000189098,0.7423636,0.0001526926,0.00006458718,5.857344e-7,0.0000577037,0.00001086884,0.00004255729],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3572819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.959781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506666487","doi":"10.15353/joci.v8i1.3061","title":"Too Old For Technology? How The Elderly Of Lisbon Use And Perceive ICT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":201,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information and Communications Technology; Mobile phone; The Internet; Digital divide; Phone; Perception; Internet privacy; Sample (material); Stratified sampling; Advertising; Psychology; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Telecommunications; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04995011549497543,"gpt":0.3016867009176408,"spread":0.2517365854226654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004092153,0.00008638676,0.0002015169,0.0001468365,0.0009419784,0.00005677412,0.001109173,0.0001664577,0.000002424135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002007839,0.00004779206,0.00006018073,0.0002579788,0.001137921,0.001066181,0.0001764108,0.0009137644,9.570257e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003919458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006795076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001802618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003011791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987718,0.0003570811,0.000378885,0.000006173983,0.0002429018,0.0002430823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966927,0.001764545,0.0006869339,0.0004159141,0.0003892774,0.00005058552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005127553,0.0001042638,0.006765954,0.00005364982,0.0001082043,5.332299e-8,0.9536852,0.000008181491,0.0001647043,0.0135254,0.005694755,0.01983831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005602486,0.0005567238,0.01208973,0.00008634136,0.0001489608,0.00006938058,0.9390414,0.00002762252,0.0006125376,0.005621824,0.04108276,0.0001024546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843257,0.0001812941,0.0008090169,0.0138911,0.0001079723,0.0002498791,0.000007298587,0.00002591203,0.0004018192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979766,0.0004977222,0.001114751,0.0002698493,0.00003800304,0.000002035646,4.097589e-7,0.000005119582,0.00009548704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03538801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7245032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1858889396","doi":"10.15353/joci.v1i1.2062","title":"Building Community Social Capital: The Potential and Promise of Information and Communications Technologies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; ICTS; Software deployment; Capital (architecture); Individual capital; Information and Communications Technology; Work (physics); Business; Public relations; Financial capital; Knowledge management; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Social science; Human capital; World Wide Web; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03271070831804929,"gpt":0.3078017456119764,"spread":0.2750910372939271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004983153,0.00007940025,0.0001733894,0.00007374918,0.004267504,0.0001103184,0.001316203,0.0001083073,0.000001111888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005126811,0.0000490733,0.000049513,0.0002378128,0.002294969,0.0009830148,0.0006317449,0.001450484,5.639064e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005669228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001238027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001664644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006042612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980521,0.0009469535,0.0005686075,0.000004322419,0.0002898796,0.0001381526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977374,0.0007773789,0.0008149582,0.0003315847,0.0003070904,0.00003158385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002624906,0.00004728672,0.00004504287,0.00003751636,0.00003191811,1.992052e-8,0.9405428,0.00006506717,0.00002338487,0.03557944,0.0001188239,0.02348248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003800379,0.000103961,0.002558056,0.00004253994,0.0000615796,0.00001867566,0.910124,0.00002691645,0.00004999944,0.08548745,0.001088341,0.00005845227],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899595,0.0004099186,0.0009087446,0.007235094,0.00005611896,0.0001786279,0.000005503537,0.0000254608,0.001221074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965765,0.002391902,0.0008321338,0.0001666018,0.00002532934,0.000001549088,0.000001623729,0.000002781543,0.000001601958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04990801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162668912","doi":"10.15353/joci.v4i3.2946","title":"Social Networks and Social Capital: Rethinking Theory in Community Informatics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informatics; Social capital; Social network (sociolinguistics); Frame (networking); Sociology; Focus (optics); Knowledge management; Social science; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; Social media","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06401124417147658,"gpt":0.3299577486054395,"spread":0.2659465044339629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103623,0.0001561704,0.0003989543,0.0001506463,0.006464435,0.00008991698,0.001116453,0.0002723713,0.00001140161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087236,0.0001246996,0.0001061334,0.0003388104,0.001884199,0.0008047589,0.0002825104,0.00394424,0.000003528571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001941189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003513851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001608249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001047682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926035,0.005225532,0.0011197,0.000005646921,0.0006188487,0.0004267804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943751,0.004022156,0.0009831376,0.0002075485,0.0003081656,0.0001039545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003971419,0.00006258033,0.00168555,0.00004231365,0.00003383732,4.571559e-7,0.9818014,0.00005654474,5.639401e-7,0.01360518,0.000937711,0.001734142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005399243,0.00008596341,0.005834116,0.00004242367,0.00004905721,0.00004379815,0.9543464,0.00007935245,0.000004420695,0.03600727,0.002831558,0.0001357606],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900899,0.00008053429,0.0004714807,0.00110835,0.000261885,0.0001424533,0.000003603674,0.00002439015,0.007817402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997067,0.0006537189,0.0001112522,0.001751515,0.0003763075,0.000001081689,0.000004224129,0.00001057468,0.00002431529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02745505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1960380014","doi":"10.15353/joci.v8i2.3042","title":"Open Government Data and the Right to Information: Opportunities and Obstacles","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Open government; Government (linguistics); Limiting; Legislation; Right to know; Access to information; Open data; Business; Information access; Public relations; Political science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1246585456967414,"gpt":0.3379477461423031,"spread":0.2132892004455617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01275594,0.00006692449,0.000141025,0.00001985038,0.001315881,0.0006117494,0.002465944,0.00002862487,0.00005642298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002903323,0.00003349585,0.00001298847,0.00008341481,0.0004327898,0.006242844,0.002060402,0.0002906977,0.00000444596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004376803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007513619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009304743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000601667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981216,0.0006485164,0.000427378,0.000004513573,0.0006473431,0.0001506551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997535,0.001317031,0.0005056725,0.0004129116,0.00009133599,0.0001380514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007097006,0.0000221099,0.0006511506,0.00002482608,0.00005212866,2.286686e-8,0.9064543,0.000002337498,1.547234e-7,0.05679183,0.01411021,0.02182002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002445456,0.00001935844,0.0007394928,0.0000156753,0.00002790152,0.000006338078,0.5097661,0.00002734617,0.000002255415,0.0005180507,0.4886009,0.0000321041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6581466,0.00045301,0.0002469938,0.05679987,0.0002634507,0.0004136876,0.00006662267,0.000007929891,0.2836019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905368,0.002580955,0.000290396,0.006330135,0.00008211727,0.000001217169,0.000004779518,0.000002148591,0.0001714498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4744906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1648694084","doi":"10.15353/joci.v8i2.3038","title":"“This is what modern deregulation looks like” : co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK’s Open Government Data Initiative","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Austerity; Government (linguistics); Politics; Deregulation; Civil society; Public administration; Context (archaeology); Political science; Open government; Coalition government; Conservative government; Sociology; Law; Open data; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.359054875033388,"gpt":0.4610728547217662,"spread":0.1020179796883783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01106706,0.00004851732,0.00009388917,0.00003015196,0.0007355456,0.0003222859,0.001497945,0.00003510928,0.00002716829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006365059,0.00002615278,0.00001649434,0.0001500429,0.0002735804,0.003801474,0.0002883213,0.000422337,9.113953e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007488467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002563595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007188329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008783891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970412,0.001686882,0.0004357454,0.000007674646,0.0007040933,0.0001244356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973065,0.001506669,0.0006767475,0.0003223638,0.0001477605,0.00003991095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003074192,0.00006084481,0.001137539,0.00001666724,0.00001927256,1.5068e-8,0.9684839,0.0000284319,0.00001283087,0.004294112,0.001788575,0.02412712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004463002,0.00008227602,0.0243396,0.0001400253,0.00002616487,0.000008935044,0.9571353,0.004712559,0.0001200957,0.004041831,0.00888886,0.00005807566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520431,0.0001459067,0.001903383,0.01574207,0.00008106983,0.0005337553,0.00005048756,0.000002133955,0.02949807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975255,0.0004317389,0.00008371899,0.001885831,0.00002580777,0.000001369561,0.00000662574,0.000001656185,0.00003775678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04548237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5657297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558314336","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i3.3280","title":"DataBasic: Design Principles, Tools and Activities for Data Literacy Learners","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"John S. and James L. Knight Foundation","keywords":"Computer science; Literacy; Set (abstract data type); Key (lock); Mathematics education; Information literacy; Learning design; Digital literacy; Pedagogy; Psychology; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1930286443424438,"gpt":0.3514204155937107,"spread":0.1583917712512669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005928895,0.00008411321,0.0001435485,0.0001042538,0.0002443189,0.0002714586,0.003718971,0.00002558127,0.000001523031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003298352,0.00004359562,0.0000204296,0.0001135096,0.0001058701,0.004664114,0.001600309,0.0004159407,0.000002272249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003710495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001342862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004371526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.830963e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988277,0.0003042714,0.0003800583,0.00001281333,0.0002952913,0.0001798723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838724,0.01419879,0.0002663764,0.001448587,0.0001448331,0.00006899585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001544771,0.00009682939,0.0006350066,0.0002860743,0.0001881134,0.000001025298,0.1242899,0.00124852,0.0004605584,0.004063888,0.01003741,0.8585383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01096594,0.005079295,0.01915549,0.00323713,0.0002842319,0.003880154,0.06455758,0.3948911,0.01500472,0.01509145,0.4658623,0.00199056],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1391782,0.00006716819,0.8598814,0.000608716,0.00007290527,0.0001156737,0.0000249534,0.00002259798,0.000028364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7683802,0.0004992882,0.2307529,0.000204478,0.00005570366,0.000002599196,0.000006070028,0.00001127007,0.00008752752],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8565477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6910835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1839736413","doi":"10.15353/joci.v2i3.2071","title":"Social Impact and Diffusion of Telecenter Use: A Study from the Sustainable Access in Rural India Project","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"ICT in Developing Communities","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Socioeconomic status; Sustainability; Economic growth; Rural area; Inequality; Socioeconomics; Geography; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04808858391041272,"gpt":0.3589514468335512,"spread":0.3108628629231385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00581724,0.0001222394,0.0002521444,0.0002390648,0.0006218604,0.000348542,0.003412873,0.00004455248,0.000001329208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002918555,0.00006418054,0.00004808287,0.0005553105,0.0001611502,0.001961695,0.002338056,0.001193272,2.432634e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001185843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002028377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004213829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003280515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974616,0.001074537,0.0007929672,0.000007578969,0.0004145577,0.0002487868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961644,0.002172423,0.0007531348,0.0005537448,0.0003312053,0.00002503954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009916288,0.0002741703,0.1054222,0.00002730994,0.00006109358,0.00000150087,0.8896443,0.00002474466,0.00000527786,0.0001626435,0.0004066136,0.003871051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000668455,0.0003140007,0.6086086,0.00006913158,0.00001246887,0.00003707371,0.3884675,0.0003278033,0.00003924954,0.001319787,0.00006873041,0.00006722681],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952089,0.0000415933,0.0040395,0.0002074807,0.00004858832,0.0002830173,0.000001715832,0.00000812948,0.0001610429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992726,0.00005647055,0.000421291,0.0002186204,0.00001891315,6.626113e-7,0.000001047432,0.000004477284,0.000005908271],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5031865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6370077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1930933356","doi":"10.15353/joci.v1i3.2032","title":"Cybercafés and their potential as Community Development Tools in India","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"ICT in Developing Communities","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Geography; Environmental planning; Urban planning; Urban community; Regional science; Point (geometry); Civil engineering; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Engineering; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03811225625601877,"gpt":0.2663382172510662,"spread":0.2282259609950474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007439606,0.0001984087,0.0003184461,0.0003212681,0.001199675,0.0003207892,0.004347212,0.0000846746,0.000005996546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002594589,0.0001333324,0.00004807112,0.000343219,0.000209299,0.002039049,0.002198543,0.003019814,0.00001934027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001702077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003395259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001158314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001144605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962119,0.002057304,0.001092995,0.000009281374,0.0003488743,0.0002795834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961434,0.001830417,0.0006247524,0.001064818,0.0002534661,0.00008315287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002341389,0.0001689202,0.0001556638,0.00004834867,0.00005585032,6.993529e-7,0.9103461,0.0006933188,0.00003192082,0.001779788,0.0003056864,0.08639031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00321359,0.0008319741,0.1954627,0.000964928,0.00003783735,0.004035474,0.7245986,0.006845566,0.009634694,0.02536053,0.02797539,0.001038709],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673325,0.0001196578,0.02701634,0.0009478127,0.000123263,0.0001103429,0.00000114316,0.00002925427,0.004319687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788087,0.000150516,0.01918417,0.001801318,0.00002347195,0.000001428544,0.000002349223,0.000007335841,0.00002073737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.195307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1801643054","doi":"10.15353/joci.v8i2.3035","title":"The Promises and Perils of Open Government Data (OGD)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Open government; Open data; Business; Government (linguistics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1288096077711311,"gpt":0.3771676127271242,"spread":0.2483580049559931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01279887,0.00005204785,0.0001219202,0.000007927016,0.001140155,0.0002401533,0.003573724,0.00002594516,0.00003392411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003591308,0.00002583408,0.00001791816,0.00008379966,0.0003745399,0.002248863,0.001481524,0.0003023094,0.000001616315],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000437076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009608577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008082003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000884251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981104,0.0006417456,0.0004049991,0.000004259638,0.000688343,0.0001503162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971644,0.001417491,0.0007546709,0.0005045821,0.00008485751,0.00007401747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001084417,0.0001436721,0.007851278,0.00005670436,0.000132877,2.021951e-8,0.9263048,0.000002871732,0.00001322183,0.01585698,0.01347476,0.03605442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001505793,0.00004571162,0.003143834,0.00002474809,0.00003678687,0.000003962249,0.6198145,0.00001861051,0.00003708192,0.0004704047,0.3762215,0.00003230263],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8834686,0.0007021407,0.00002622412,0.005398417,0.0001613729,0.0001873009,0.00001991693,0.000002617273,0.1100335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960242,0.003209783,0.0001695659,0.0003518639,0.00007838856,4.508311e-7,0.000001130621,0.000002329567,0.0001622682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3627467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8769265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140441039","doi":"10.15353/joci.v7i3.2592","title":"Towards Participatory Action Design Research: Adapting Action Research and Design Science Research Methods for Urban Informatics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Participatory action research; Participatory design; Action research; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Action (physics); Urban computing; Domain (mathematical analysis); Design science research; Informatics; Discipline; Citizen journalism; Data science; Human–computer interaction; Sociology; Information system; World Wide Web; Engineering; Social science; Artificial intelligence; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9044653411156394,"gpt":0.6534172752696299,"spread":0.2510480658460095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3660735,0.0001131304,0.0002330254,0.001175575,0.01151784,0.0005744243,0.001453405,0.00012305,0.00002654715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009743311,0.00008295801,0.00004557796,0.00196303,0.003152832,0.00482689,0.0003785258,0.002078458,0.0000114512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001868372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001041582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007856357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9746984,0.01942839,0.00183072,0.00002630112,0.002917049,0.001099096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807964,0.009954656,0.0008837362,0.000459485,0.007654266,0.0002514612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003352921,0.0000446572,0.00001633885,0.0001083109,0.00002370769,3.16143e-8,0.9114808,0.00007988923,0.0002028453,0.02233442,0.002416606,0.06295715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003723886,0.001222279,0.0001597909,0.0000922055,0.00001629514,0.00001516623,0.9424899,0.003723052,0.006531899,0.02941182,0.01587524,0.00008995661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.236868,0.0000577557,0.7496789,0.0003243096,0.0003950366,0.001610392,0.000003037985,0.00002588792,0.0110367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9035482,0.0004139786,0.09567919,0.00006366495,0.0001639448,0.00004068013,0.000001273338,0.0000109149,0.00007813557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6666802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557892356","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i3.3279","title":"Contributions of Paulo Freire for a Critical Data Literacy: a Popular Education Approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Brazilian cultural history and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Critical literacy; Parallels; Literacy; Information literacy; Literacy education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Work (physics); Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0860635635182296,"gpt":0.4020503062837745,"spread":0.3159867427655449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003744447,0.00005618763,0.0001547758,0.00004112795,0.0008649021,0.00002792714,0.00113188,0.00006802665,0.00001560796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003835683,0.00003005457,0.00005809576,0.00009602073,0.0004890189,0.00103898,0.0000912372,0.0003013029,0.000002660057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008967248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004975609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001098181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003851575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983646,0.0007255869,0.0005374034,0.000006895838,0.000220654,0.0001448124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966637,0.001490773,0.0004014041,0.0004571465,0.0008944322,0.00009251756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009094181,0.0004650604,0.00006277089,0.0002052272,0.00007702517,3.49257e-8,0.6868638,0.000004500978,0.00006443408,0.2422148,0.04978995,0.02016143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005667766,0.0002011196,0.0001766059,0.0002844789,0.0002451982,0.00004285866,0.3610513,0.0000963413,0.00008745989,0.04576727,0.5913559,0.0001247274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8369319,0.001444116,0.1117002,0.0238493,0.001656058,0.0009638348,0.001985575,0.00003981491,0.02142918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958241,0.00009787962,0.003246195,0.0004439756,0.0001753956,0.000001492773,0.00002152859,0.000002854632,0.0001865955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.541566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6652215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602503601","doi":"10.15353/joci.v2i3.2072","title":"Using a Sustainable Livelihoods Approach to Assessing the Impact of ICTs in Development","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Scope (computer science); ICTS; Information and Communications Technology; Sustainable development; Business; Impact assessment; Knowledge management; Process management; Computer science; Political science; Geography; Agriculture; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07446918101365303,"gpt":0.3402631783297425,"spread":0.2657939973160894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01365492,0.0001261941,0.0002434537,0.0004844865,0.0006689598,0.00008990221,0.0009365357,0.00008063648,0.00000283337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004714007,0.00006996756,0.00005664857,0.001346677,0.0001487957,0.000898456,0.0006063539,0.00094504,0.000001907665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002704478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002177009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003158087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009597625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983723,0.00008568236,0.0009526689,0.00001022475,0.0002816049,0.000297492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979096,0.0002280188,0.0009808685,0.0002323596,0.0006400892,0.000009075201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003470633,0.001565695,0.07320407,0.001123076,0.0006650672,0.000004773221,0.7994821,0.02539465,0.0003732233,0.06374431,0.00150832,0.03258762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005282667,0.00003706156,0.2239078,0.0001611914,0.00003817182,0.00003208106,0.7660898,0.001619121,0.0004870454,0.005988614,0.0009218543,0.0001890282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9317749,0.00001402816,0.04470298,0.00007754805,0.00003998229,0.0001967303,9.23701e-8,0.000007907421,0.02318583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916375,0.000002217078,0.007887648,0.0004055829,0.00004657868,9.612522e-7,0.000001254266,0.000007341231,0.00001088043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1507037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5145165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501452274","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i2.3246","title":"Researching the emerging impacts of open data: revisiting the ODDC conceptual framework","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Open government; Transparency (behavior); Open data; Civil society; Openness to experience; Context (archaeology); Mainstream; Data governance; Empowerment; Corporate governance; Political science; Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Data quality; Geography; Service (business)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1652257115880096,"gpt":0.4369443422284339,"spread":0.2717186306404243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03496883,0.00007388265,0.0001771076,0.00003196632,0.002363999,0.0003904701,0.00952151,0.00004442314,0.0001113965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00506951,0.00002638805,0.00004717476,0.0003022147,0.0009796832,0.002492373,0.002633784,0.001061453,0.000005891033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005711312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002888254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002824371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006456893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951431,0.002909603,0.000672079,0.00000973259,0.001014703,0.0002507369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858869,0.01151335,0.00126926,0.0009768534,0.0002840883,0.00006950806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005108254,0.00001508603,0.001559148,0.00002512341,0.0000953872,9.397227e-8,0.9250903,0.00001899938,0.0000221126,0.03922473,0.004396386,0.02950162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001894214,0.00004575886,0.001177186,0.0004840639,0.00003578651,0.000005365455,0.9339723,0.00005167581,0.00003753174,0.006976981,0.05697353,0.00005041191],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9008282,0.0002909345,0.001003942,0.07071707,0.0001655881,0.0002188173,0.00001926841,0.00000634578,0.02674983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970762,0.001181155,0.0002332294,0.001101774,0.0003476675,3.676655e-7,9.709357e-7,0.000004441463,0.00005424222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09624794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558376413","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i3.3285","title":"Data Murals: Using the Arts to Build Data Literacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Literacy; The arts; Focus (optics); Set (abstract data type); Critical literacy; Digital literacy; Visual arts; Sociology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.205778547682592,"gpt":0.4200238864669845,"spread":0.2142453387843925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005684808,0.00009427832,0.00014892,0.0000930442,0.0004888934,0.0004363351,0.01597233,0.00002161079,0.00001092818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008538219,0.00003864146,0.00002286744,0.000376419,0.00007928516,0.005055549,0.00698156,0.0003539147,0.00002945618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002484378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001184786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002101826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000131172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982285,0.0004491244,0.0007119681,0.0000165973,0.0004356829,0.0001580593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926248,0.001038429,0.0006178924,0.005338834,0.0002888364,0.00009119047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004400934,0.0003083708,0.0002203756,0.00008929808,0.0002809067,0.000002433764,0.1700197,0.001428751,0.0004071355,0.01515167,0.415331,0.3967164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004715796,0.0001166639,0.0001646436,0.0003689523,0.00008572416,0.0004343826,0.0119351,0.4160896,0.000148538,0.002610996,0.5673744,0.0001993735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02332876,0.00003717779,0.9692097,0.006769522,0.0001825742,0.00006376037,0.0001392454,0.0000142894,0.0002549464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8383285,0.0007109866,0.1369127,0.02340881,0.0003420342,3.119771e-7,0.0001028568,0.0000217845,0.0001719899],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.832297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557723918","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i3.3274","title":"Data Literacy - What is it and how can we make it happen?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Context (archaeology); Information literacy; The Internet; Computer science; Data science; Internet privacy; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Geography; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3108962033243062,"gpt":0.4375052943879286,"spread":0.1266090910636223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02047005,0.0001168786,0.0002734635,0.0001759768,0.0004585626,0.001715645,0.005324927,0.0000381127,0.0001960572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001885265,0.00005146019,0.00004575033,0.0002293824,0.0002428657,0.006758961,0.003015447,0.0004629653,0.00008728621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002344907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006187652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002625299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002473248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966441,0.001029299,0.0009508945,0.00002028869,0.001177865,0.000177543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912884,0.004430473,0.001158251,0.002629043,0.0003738576,0.0001199683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003182142,0.00003615953,0.00003116404,0.00002406642,0.0000494816,5.349541e-7,0.1295873,0.000002083347,0.000004301764,0.0003625237,0.4032383,0.4666323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003484318,0.00008525853,0.0001788691,0.0002153167,0.00003614224,0.00006739733,0.2859264,0.0001976199,0.00001771019,0.01161849,0.7012393,0.00006906517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2555984,0.0004546955,0.02739352,0.7111325,0.0005284476,0.0002183882,0.0006065462,0.00001072345,0.004056727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944942,0.01559947,0.00171246,0.03344433,0.0000837694,5.403621e-7,0.00001630181,0.000008793257,0.004192309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6893436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581979016","doi":"10.15353/joci.v9i4.3137","title":"Telecentre functionality in South Africa: Re-enabling the community ICT access environment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Key (lock); Information and Communications Technology; Citizen journalism; Participatory action research; Quality (philosophy); Action (physics); Point (geometry); Process management; Business; Quality of life (healthcare); Computer science; Public relations; Knowledge management; Telecommunications; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer security; Psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05107155372497737,"gpt":0.2561315134417377,"spread":0.2050599597167604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002715242,0.0001393923,0.0002001304,0.00009843387,0.0006057298,0.0001529092,0.001321465,0.00005664943,0.0001294975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001172647,0.00007676932,0.00006838432,0.0001911015,0.0001238677,0.0007785663,0.0002767832,0.002438578,0.00004621887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001297026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002479685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002947696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003370196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980684,0.0007416916,0.0006612422,0.000002513676,0.0002812913,0.0002448748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979766,0.001037272,0.0002653119,0.0005937866,0.0000639783,0.00006303439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001535327,0.00006372092,0.001793918,0.00007483874,0.0000748885,3.649068e-8,0.8958808,0.09579317,0.00003626223,0.00002730985,0.004956029,0.00128363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005539068,0.0001049127,0.06560066,0.00009221084,0.00006427919,0.00004243859,0.9166279,0.003199616,0.0003760319,0.001566429,0.01158109,0.0001905522],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928371,0.0001659746,0.0008657714,0.000456177,0.0001106897,0.000141195,0.000006689605,0.00002149315,0.005394928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992939,0.0002349295,0.00002370275,0.0003575871,0.00004424377,0.000002111431,0.000003093405,0.0000100364,0.00003034934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09259356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580410547","doi":"10.15353/joci.v1i3.2031","title":"Crisis, Farming & Community","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Business; Action (physics); ICTS; Community organization; Economic growth; Political science; Information and Communications Technology; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08842091861863999,"gpt":0.2979782989688685,"spread":0.2095573803502285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004465714,0.00009308084,0.0001935739,0.00001670791,0.001028621,0.00003746189,0.001131616,0.00004598018,0.0001601149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002423918,0.00002854221,0.0001069663,0.0001449192,0.00008875332,0.0003481176,0.0003243667,0.001082876,0.00007459355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000261216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005560823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003322486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000807624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976932,0.001379552,0.0005857832,0.000004647779,0.0001642714,0.0001725314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979135,0.001266519,0.0004867636,0.0001385657,0.0001203508,0.00007426892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060699,0.001337503,0.008534091,0.0001434929,0.000395989,5.096571e-7,0.2046334,0.002399995,0.004254763,0.002401684,0.4181724,0.3571192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003194266,0.0005798909,0.1069917,0.00004575102,0.0001506262,0.00007558979,0.3394558,0.0002295182,0.00007859404,0.004181999,0.5476665,0.0002245657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899279,0.00009086951,0.0001588027,0.005293413,0.00004095192,0.00005205748,0.000004985709,0.00001597152,0.004415084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943037,0.0002017423,0.0002284109,0.005073506,0.0001252769,3.661794e-7,0.00001185285,4.863246e-7,0.0000546616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3568946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7911428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1769211578","doi":"10.15353/joci.v2i2.2078","title":"Digital Inclusion without Social Inclusion: The Consumption of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Homeless Subculture in Central Scotland","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; ICTS; Inclusion (mineral); Digital inclusion; Information and Communications Technology; Subculture (biology); The Internet; Sociology; Consumption (sociology); Digital divide; Social exclusion; Internet privacy; Public relations; Social science; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02012646231398845,"gpt":0.2947295807939471,"spread":0.2746031184799586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002214292,0.00007753329,0.0002048965,0.0001446078,0.001738066,0.00008184233,0.0007419463,0.000148251,0.000001525185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004367856,0.00004807782,0.00002842034,0.000312505,0.0008301757,0.001198219,0.001015257,0.0008208636,5.996308e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001459428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002242232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005814173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998056,0.0006084135,0.0007269544,0.000006074676,0.0004299324,0.000172617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981448,0.0007409935,0.0007542901,0.0001549142,0.000184999,0.00001999986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005355673,0.00005522775,0.07639107,0.00005095319,0.000005996897,6.140722e-8,0.9075543,0.0000727928,0.00001549313,0.004701079,0.0001100171,0.01098945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000931072,0.00006203086,0.08033232,0.0001846844,0.0000233104,0.000008120692,0.8892993,0.0001305845,0.0001115526,0.02478979,0.004032122,0.00009507692],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951239,0.0002365709,0.00006815462,0.002871009,0.00005690474,0.0001855989,0.00000876826,0.00001180656,0.001437331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987047,0.001112113,0.00005000366,0.00008538534,0.00002950568,0.000001135724,0.00001179872,0.000002216733,0.000003189923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02008871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597910878","doi":"10.15353/joci.v10i3.3439","title":"Expanded Urban Planning as a Vehicle for Understanding and Shaping Smart, Liveable Cities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Smart Cities and Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technocracy; Smart city; Marketing buzz; Urban planning; IBM; Political science; Politics; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering; Business; Internet of Things; Civil engineering; Advertising","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07746677143380018,"gpt":0.2580254570277017,"spread":0.1805586855939016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001005371,0.00008641931,0.0001684036,0.0000976529,0.0004168262,0.00007922192,0.0002887214,0.00005032917,0.000002733845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001532253,0.00006250366,0.00003547114,0.000058001,0.00009166149,0.0003119765,0.0000808725,0.0004455413,7.697959e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005308894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009715699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001052238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003364935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993758,0.00004293642,0.000323553,0.000004635209,0.0001012924,0.0001517353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987068,0.0009181885,0.0001365428,0.0001653434,0.000043164,0.00002998048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002047547,0.00004011744,0.004215674,0.001717941,0.0005951581,7.075793e-7,0.8593103,0.060461,0.0006117165,0.0440545,0.01795831,0.01082983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001050935,0.0005355506,0.0004385391,0.0004410528,0.00008091376,0.0001531892,0.837197,0.09331153,0.001355054,0.05753701,0.007684911,0.0002142815],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9254442,0.0002593264,0.06985833,0.0001071846,0.0001009865,0.0000643749,0.000001719724,0.0000754826,0.004088374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990242,0.0001307457,0.0006626566,0.0001253418,0.00003323466,0.000001208346,7.894362e-7,0.000009587322,0.00001223859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07357998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3205932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109694918","doi":"10.15353/joci.v1i3.2029","title":"Is Community Informatics Good for Communities? Questions Confronting an Emerging Field","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informatics; Field (mathematics); Citizen journalism; Engineering informatics; Empowerment; Health Administration Informatics; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Community of practice; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Health informatics; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Social science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06750276460396891,"gpt":0.3073784854737269,"spread":0.2398757208697579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008079412,0.0001991016,0.0003338452,0.0003074434,0.00358375,0.0002128387,0.001888829,0.0001668516,0.00003769653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004661141,0.0001555715,0.0001025292,0.0003892414,0.0002621736,0.002891976,0.0006641654,0.002666368,0.00001540838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008197792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006628553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003671985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002875524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.0002408613,0.00133852,0.000006303809,0.0002738186,0.0002896897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957973,0.000890623,0.00165619,0.0006611597,0.0009785993,0.00001611328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001246146,0.0005330272,0.003114172,0.0006214437,0.0003219869,7.522654e-8,0.8288906,0.0008305231,0.0000130685,0.08303511,0.01590011,0.06661527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008154591,0.0001353915,0.00123864,0.0001589102,0.000131095,0.00002122583,0.884515,0.008515438,0.0002145139,0.01499639,0.08900252,0.0002554188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9344611,0.00001962599,0.04337167,0.003005725,0.000216069,0.0002672806,0.000006159962,0.00007395827,0.01857847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977249,0.00003500082,0.007652361,0.0147335,0.0002353792,0.000007069498,0.00003474881,0.0000151935,0.00003771195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07310241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593809228","doi":"10.15353/joci.v9i2.3174","title":"A review on mHealth research in developing countries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Mobile Health and mHealth Applications","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"mHealth; Developing country; Rigour; Lagging; Livelihood; Psychological intervention; Mobile technology; Health care; Business; Economic growth; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Mobile computing; Geography; Telecommunications; Nursing; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5467069083871173,"gpt":0.6131140356092789,"spread":0.06640712722216158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07063801,0.0003223331,0.002198251,0.0007960232,0.002884765,0.00001210396,0.001986891,0.0004393604,0.00008320521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009275776,0.0001830601,0.0001780418,0.001378913,0.0001851672,0.0002392145,0.0004285149,0.01567646,0.0008649281],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001715401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009771885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001842053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001643404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9742431,0.0180853,0.005682709,0.0000207312,0.0008374946,0.001130639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738591,0.01852999,0.004769458,0.001403659,0.0010315,0.000406336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001692608,0.00005236486,0.000004001231,0.3995716,0.00001728694,1.156528e-7,0.01187282,3.630244e-7,1.538492e-10,0.003793516,0.0476484,0.5370226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001723665,0.00009761394,0.00001022283,0.2361263,0.0001598356,0.00004502074,0.005563631,3.682214e-7,3.211293e-9,0.0002236472,0.7575084,0.00009256325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001549558,0.9838591,0.00006075793,0.004644992,0.0004220308,0.00512422,0.00002820385,0.00001447053,0.005830776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000005843268,0.9799992,0.0001856205,0.01860039,0.000299067,0.0007837162,0.00003417277,0.00003489258,0.0000570585],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.70986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124328375","doi":"10.15353/joci.v1i2.2049","title":"Sustaining Computer Use and Learning in Community Computing Contexts: Making Technology Part of Who They are and What They Do","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Nexus (standard); Work (physics); Knowledge management; Participatory design; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Participatory planning; Process (computing); Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0337460576943033,"gpt":0.2635867585981696,"spread":0.2298407009038663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006865772,0.0001480912,0.0003924379,0.0004664943,0.00107477,0.0002862365,0.000581712,0.0001461389,0.000001607706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006032098,0.000111342,0.00002755779,0.0003261822,0.0004055613,0.002430151,0.001235117,0.002949851,6.866107e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004809714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002096328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007726954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001703508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984009,0.0003770018,0.0008451091,0.00001541601,0.0001574227,0.0002041664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969632,0.0008672495,0.001485748,0.0002340717,0.0004433409,0.000006373117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001249764,0.0001846473,0.2381567,0.0006176133,0.0002010035,0.00000183758,0.3717259,0.003454421,0.00001246839,0.04104451,0.0001330042,0.3443429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001018268,0.00008072738,0.07109106,0.001746094,0.00004698236,0.00005648746,0.9056539,0.00639008,0.00002878872,0.01075544,0.002921512,0.0002106624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966288,0.0001542544,0.001451307,0.001142694,0.00005803741,0.0001210385,2.815526e-7,0.00002914018,0.0004144037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970301,0.0002334302,0.00160644,0.001058215,0.00005832477,5.962784e-7,0.000001330421,0.00000894882,0.000002644001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.533928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924680885","doi":"10.15353/joci.v10i3.3440","title":"Rethinking Third Places: Contemporary Design With Technology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Affordance; ICTS; Point (geometry); Third order; Order (exchange); Third world; Third age; Sociology; Economic geography; Information and Communications Technology; Geography; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Political science; World Wide Web; History; Business; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06088809969653486,"gpt":0.2771043437634202,"spread":0.2162162440668853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055327,0.0001317478,0.0002436869,0.0004664953,0.0005797616,0.00009059112,0.002985881,0.0001292694,0.000001919521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003935485,0.00007701409,0.00003012864,0.0006455329,0.0003355601,0.001467005,0.0003963537,0.002476969,0.00001606779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000662032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001354442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006934116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004771599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980826,0.000733191,0.0006977006,0.00001202942,0.0003087293,0.0001657469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958731,0.001147318,0.00138894,0.0008953422,0.0006711529,0.00002413945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004655903,0.0003091935,0.0005914691,0.0001367141,0.0004969079,0.000006688642,0.611822,0.005287129,0.001327777,0.3344504,0.01684305,0.02826302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004036314,0.01000583,0.0005520493,0.001289078,0.0001061271,0.008546619,0.1659446,0.07177535,0.05374907,0.6614336,0.02169943,0.0008619966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2490863,0.00001842082,0.7431351,0.002457637,0.0001183326,0.00008821917,1.469141e-7,0.00009073859,0.005005098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416061,0.000008283148,0.05718098,0.001163393,0.00001707895,0.000001232347,3.28387e-7,0.000005529904,0.0000170556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6925198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1632688631","doi":"10.15353/joci.v2i2.2079","title":"A Research Design to Build Effective Partnerships between City Planners, Developers, Government and Urban Neighbourhood Communities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Canadian Immunization Research Network; Cape Peninsula University of Technology","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Place identity; Urbanism; Urban planning; Sociology; Urban design; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Metropolitan area; Political science; Architecture; Geography; Civil engineering; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1669328955151052,"gpt":0.3791833982606216,"spread":0.2122505027455164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01236785,0.0001212979,0.000278163,0.0001054657,0.002706259,0.0001863367,0.00100929,0.0001148084,0.00001182347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001011099,0.00008906988,0.00004612582,0.0003728135,0.000806818,0.0003500328,0.0002618142,0.001665486,0.000006629553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004014623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000287187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005856618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001466839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916047,0.006389494,0.0005251725,0.000008383231,0.00103186,0.000440372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866941,0.0120888,0.0002942446,0.0002647919,0.0004356623,0.0002223962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007406469,0.0000545891,0.02693572,0.00002466878,0.00006355995,3.134697e-7,0.9508443,0.00004001083,0.000003294828,0.00674165,0.0134943,0.001723542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003399936,0.0003995455,0.01592877,0.00009916045,0.0000567836,0.000006085741,0.9474391,0.000007943896,0.0002787362,0.007805881,0.02751899,0.0001190514],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801481,0.00007992599,0.002107903,0.003101475,0.00009102994,0.0004131596,0.00001819577,0.00001335725,0.01402679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985225,0.0000822174,0.000492137,0.0004661865,0.0003580724,0.00000533922,0.000002143033,0.00000797019,0.00006348363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01837429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562412989","doi":"10.15353/joci.v10i3.3447","title":"(Re)Prioritizing Citizens in Smart Cities Governance: Examples of Smart Citizenship from Urban India","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Smart Cities and Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Corporate governance; Smart city; Commercialization; Information and Communications Technology; Public relations; Work (physics); Political science; Business; Engineering; Internet privacy; Marketing; Internet of Things; Politics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02546494256025653,"gpt":0.2210992964896457,"spread":0.1956343539293892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001575929,0.0001833844,0.0004650558,0.0001664778,0.0001506176,0.00004587444,0.0009792643,0.0001312472,0.00002582402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004506506,0.0001429597,0.00009829721,0.0002226634,0.0002297196,0.0002496406,0.0001985965,0.001312487,0.000004323129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008776679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002828947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002368293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002602739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981555,0.0002066383,0.001039434,0.00001074691,0.0003284855,0.0002591563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968845,0.001934718,0.000471057,0.0005541476,0.0001113202,0.00004427111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003611585,0.0001749511,0.1469503,0.00208296,0.001177113,0.000007541304,0.7180265,0.0178255,0.001334544,0.01616488,0.05130713,0.04458737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003096682,0.0007548087,0.2796055,0.001931767,0.0001997417,0.00009548174,0.6353963,0.00664469,0.01274424,0.0495565,0.00916023,0.0008140084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988932,0.0004641968,0.0005780928,0.0001037911,0.0002845244,0.00007087487,0.00003918957,0.00007210151,0.009455198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980939,0.0009450134,0.0007333439,0.0001327652,0.00006346867,0.000001298657,0.000004691935,0.00001868824,0.000006852385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1326552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5829727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506086377","doi":"10.15353/joci.v3i2.2373","title":"Trapped in the Digital Divide: The Distributive Paradigm in Community Informatics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Equity (law); Ambivalence; Scholarship; Distributive property; Inequality; Sociology; Digital divide; Scope (computer science); Informatics; Distributive justice; Public relations; Political science; Information and Communications Technology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economic Justice; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05169430081007102,"gpt":0.3555547765869735,"spread":0.3038604757769025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03938412,0.0001314455,0.0002327362,0.0001529762,0.002377368,0.0004058681,0.00207747,0.00007657056,0.00001231869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009862133,0.00006597628,0.00008962849,0.0008181398,0.0005679742,0.002293432,0.0001609598,0.002067871,0.00001182684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002400082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001788918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001664388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004772711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940564,0.002579432,0.002098095,0.000004649274,0.0008707212,0.0003907146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924874,0.005347696,0.001420134,0.0004812951,0.0002074519,0.00005601374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005501999,0.00006783493,0.001822921,0.00002527615,0.00001697022,1.217308e-7,0.9730048,0.0001478172,2.24531e-7,0.01644159,0.0008092441,0.007608155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005592583,0.0001199232,0.02092024,0.00005798248,0.00001477529,0.00003027612,0.9381111,0.00005291787,0.000007870231,0.007462866,0.03258231,0.00008052574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9610471,0.0000187796,0.00748329,0.001707757,0.0001496591,0.0004577069,0.00002994253,0.000008639004,0.02909716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986546,0.00008632051,0.00001886001,0.001144511,0.00005580417,0.000002519789,0.00002268074,0.000003595438,0.00001111087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0383979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493996439","doi":"10.15353/joci.v8i1.3053","title":"What Seniors Value About Online Community","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Online community; Value systems; Key (lock); Sociology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Public relations; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04471609807226958,"gpt":0.3376071909575362,"spread":0.2928910928852667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01313097,0.0001355905,0.0002776406,0.0001585071,0.002722444,0.0001236301,0.002492449,0.0001800062,0.0000298063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00131578,0.00009344309,0.000107183,0.0003802396,0.0009202937,0.003146154,0.000425489,0.00382897,0.00003414078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001579322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001692841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001488236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001709532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941604,0.004039787,0.0007992061,0.000004616557,0.0005727197,0.0004232719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956738,0.002050797,0.0009255643,0.0007994522,0.0003675257,0.000182908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001957408,0.0003560129,0.001423371,0.00002622726,0.00006189498,9.498253e-8,0.9824743,0.00006144703,0.00001109491,0.002116494,0.002562472,0.01088707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003533288,0.0001078301,0.01075633,0.0001490642,0.00007595343,0.00007455768,0.9456969,0.00002068678,0.0001111067,0.002551007,0.03999132,0.0001118585],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910499,0.0003926027,0.0003425232,0.0037716,0.000838683,0.0001324727,0.000005753638,0.00006541151,0.003401091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952363,0.002082203,0.0008168051,0.001611594,0.0001583762,4.942224e-7,0.000003856928,0.000009403017,0.00008100171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03742884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129478654","doi":"10.15353/joci.v7i1-2.2561","title":"Participation and Deliberation on the Internet: A Case Study of Digital Participatory Budgeting in Belo Horizonte","year":2011,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1804921543671609,"gpt":0.3490788203616991,"spread":0.1685866659945383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006247709,0.0001144359,0.0002124745,0.00008065488,0.0004771756,0.0001438268,0.0005371284,0.0000567341,0.00002698846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004066922,0.0000667905,0.00003942946,0.0002445623,0.0002241603,0.001122782,0.0001948001,0.0007158752,0.000002724865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006194289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003575229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966286,0.00163557,0.001040831,0.00001164211,0.0005103994,0.000172969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966863,0.001486261,0.00130587,0.0002499623,0.000206979,0.00006464092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001116272,0.0005773169,0.01932304,0.00002881067,0.00006843635,0.000002613434,0.9759765,0.00005808432,8.607331e-7,0.0003486916,0.00009503758,0.003408951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004899161,0.001548536,0.01334133,0.0001120877,0.0001051617,0.00002176329,0.9826574,0.001331039,0.00003545103,0.0002383139,0.00004939646,0.00006955398],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963885,0.00004126376,0.00003452054,0.0005061048,0.0001132319,0.000261452,0.000002819379,0.000003354713,0.002648765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997079,0.00004492833,0.000004082974,0.000176059,0.00003122915,0.000002442238,4.467274e-7,0.000004743622,0.00002819749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01003417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7594362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1647345224","doi":"10.15353/joci.v2i3.2067","title":"The Impacts of Community Telecenters in Rural Colombia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"ICTS; Political science; Work (physics); Geography; Humanities; Welfare economics; Economic growth; Business; Information and Communications Technology; Engineering; Economics; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02730495369097399,"gpt":0.2689077189013466,"spread":0.2416027652103726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0157616,0.00009987109,0.0002081641,0.0002084418,0.001059076,0.00004957695,0.001373629,0.00008382503,0.000004159261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007242883,0.00005817996,0.00005136528,0.0006736382,0.0005062803,0.0005740402,0.00050891,0.002049313,0.000004472091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008481676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004196237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004236379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006164667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983531,0.0001974817,0.0009683878,0.000003492595,0.0002498857,0.000227599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971529,0.000870551,0.001234608,0.0003222331,0.0004128415,0.000006843928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001690364,0.001425556,0.1397097,0.0007607149,0.0006301687,0.000002220932,0.5157123,0.0001465013,0.0004725663,0.1558778,0.01962236,0.1639498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008887413,0.0000806376,0.2465563,0.00012184,0.00003438059,0.0000180617,0.7189991,0.00005799394,0.0005550728,0.02773057,0.004839945,0.000117429],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890791,0.00002444419,0.0005545419,0.0008258285,0.0001670073,0.0001173717,4.612948e-7,0.00001015761,0.009221138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998477,0.00004720688,0.0001058744,0.001321376,0.00003322871,4.783532e-7,0.000002561344,0.000005101672,0.000007114177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2032868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8903359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557327480","doi":"10.15353/joci.v10i3.3441","title":"Augmented Reality at the Service of Participatory Urban Planning and Community Informatics – a case study from Vienna","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Augmented Reality Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Augmented reality; Citizen journalism; Participatory planning; Process (computing); Field (mathematics); Service (business); Repertoire; Computer science; Process management; Human–computer interaction; World Wide Web; Engineering; Geography; Business; Environmental planning; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1052988826539752,"gpt":0.3381540877779396,"spread":0.2328552051239644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01213862,0.0001856755,0.0003839309,0.00009254027,0.002200455,0.0001154619,0.002702663,0.00006447405,0.000003332469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003043849,0.0001117307,0.00006157879,0.0004512752,0.0003012249,0.0008173832,0.002137168,0.001926207,0.000004701308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009501151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008275641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003121601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001147282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931946,0.00439203,0.001635512,0.00001325576,0.0005413617,0.000223193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906405,0.004383079,0.002088464,0.002280725,0.0004692267,0.0001379662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003588242,0.0004719836,0.002628595,0.0001019572,0.0001801188,9.448073e-7,0.9899381,0.003629623,0.00002784227,0.0002160808,0.0007819933,0.00198685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001389031,0.0006711288,0.01196998,0.0001422587,0.0002736703,0.0009246379,0.8671651,0.1144967,0.0002620913,0.001362849,0.001153176,0.0001893375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8797845,0.00003757733,0.1187832,0.000593358,0.00004888827,0.0003119875,0.00001982445,0.00002499299,0.0003957027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982897,0.00001440262,0.0007202257,0.0009372304,0.00001614458,0.000005690702,0.000006692649,0.00000634014,0.000003569151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.122773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528559802","doi":"10.15353/joci.v11i1.2857","title":"From Digital Divide to Digital Inclusion and Beyond","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital divide; Socioeconomic status; ICTS; Digital inclusion; Inclusion (mineral); Ideology; Inequality; The Internet; Sociology; Information and Communications Technology; Social inequality; Information society; Telecommunications; Multimedia; Computer science; Internet privacy; Political science; Social science; World Wide Web; Politics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02245417379337637,"gpt":0.2534043087304241,"spread":0.2309501349370477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004042694,0.0000804081,0.0001295181,0.00006657423,0.0001645264,0.0001852291,0.0003685492,0.00002906729,0.000002087236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001570881,0.0000511834,0.00002372069,0.00007521585,0.00003758942,0.001072445,0.0005751126,0.0003800169,0.00001849822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003579584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001822387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002502076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003628413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993615,0.00002535623,0.0003078301,0.000001341459,0.0001990229,0.0001049397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992281,0.0002917768,0.00007911491,0.000180305,0.00007056425,0.0001501579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002388441,0.00001393409,0.0002725307,0.00001264205,0.00003769627,9.536151e-8,0.9643475,0.004358356,0.0000273909,0.00001727705,0.01432437,0.01656429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001327306,0.0008046647,0.002859305,0.0001722161,0.00008654444,0.0003658432,0.8539385,0.00220927,0.00112828,0.02405581,0.1126479,0.000404399],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862438,0.00008235953,0.00227594,0.0003504279,0.0001148003,0.0000333216,0.00004400083,0.00002029844,0.01083508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999499,0.00002418066,0.00004715725,0.0003194406,0.00007907161,8.701744e-8,0.00000575723,0.00000696694,0.00001839734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.110409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2087199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505025516","doi":"10.15353/joci.v4i1.2967","title":"Anytime? Anywhere?: Reframing Debates Around Community and Municipal Wireless Networking","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Affordance; Wireless network; Phrase; Wireless; Sociology; Telecommunications; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Social psychology; Human–computer interaction; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07616159670947142,"gpt":0.330773066890633,"spread":0.2546114701811615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004684788,0.0001269639,0.0003033151,0.00007772267,0.005818387,0.00008938378,0.001062949,0.0001320457,0.000008870243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005788776,0.00009609098,0.00006895272,0.0002605965,0.001354499,0.0005619059,0.0002389259,0.002329057,0.000004082116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002334552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008377447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001538585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952115,0.003323055,0.0006520483,0.000006699051,0.0004554872,0.0003512152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939944,0.004538355,0.0006529107,0.0003609419,0.0002685564,0.0001848134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000211514,0.00005622829,0.005765729,0.0000243966,0.00004711738,7.742573e-7,0.9901008,0.00004962375,0.00001065531,0.0003792943,0.0005236963,0.003020538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003464505,0.0001415661,0.001981954,0.0001101644,0.00006786868,0.0001199354,0.9757853,0.0002680341,0.00005206568,0.003261714,0.0177382,0.0001267878],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923325,0.0003068162,0.000141359,0.0004893217,0.0003919812,0.00009094532,0.000002355112,0.00002187343,0.006222883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959095,0.002752812,0.0002055869,0.0006769159,0.0003992912,5.59666e-7,0.000001821755,0.00000922876,0.00004434296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0172145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500688904","doi":"10.15353/joci.v8i1.3057","title":"“Getting Turned On”: Using ICT Training To Promote Active Ageing In New York City","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social connectedness; Active ageing; Information and Communications Technology; Social engagement; The Internet; Training (meteorology); Gerontology; Civic engagement; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Older people; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Social science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1327968594136862,"gpt":0.3545811554470916,"spread":0.2217842960334054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006779397,0.0001163495,0.0002519157,0.0002647814,0.0009436267,0.00005549967,0.001040481,0.0001182893,0.00001356801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001793813,0.00008835895,0.00005901898,0.000497397,0.0001447861,0.0008861965,0.0001711408,0.001827329,0.000008392482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003124774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003053346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001180509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001351569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977267,0.0007753114,0.0006184308,0.000009307873,0.0004250561,0.0004451842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979694,0.0008015375,0.0006669409,0.0002883356,0.00009169684,0.0001820491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003598447,0.00004448925,0.001068246,0.00000700406,0.00002278979,3.879053e-7,0.9674767,0.0004176919,0.00008568367,0.0003558846,0.000111916,0.03037324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000642791,0.0001749834,0.01849245,0.0006105144,0.00004650111,0.00005093456,0.971466,0.0001677093,0.0009593179,0.001698565,0.005492599,0.0001975993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930475,0.00002724158,0.001342538,0.001364378,0.0001830437,0.000199891,0.000001024143,0.00003356398,0.003800857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943292,0.00001236914,0.004775501,0.0007126405,0.0001405322,3.258089e-7,2.288634e-7,0.00000779523,0.00002136368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03017564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7938936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542477279","doi":"10.15353/joci.v10i3.3450","title":"The Right(s) to the Hybrid City and the Role of DIY Networking","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public space; Computer science; Software deployment; Sociology; Subject (documents); Information and Communications Technology; Metaphor; Public relations; World Wide Web; Architectural engineering; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02208068337730229,"gpt":0.2938357548085898,"spread":0.2717550714312875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01043047,0.00006706865,0.0001723805,0.00001871446,0.003300242,0.0001167378,0.001395592,0.00003163288,0.00000492561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001527824,0.00002479252,0.00007220024,0.0001472743,0.001144365,0.0001264554,0.0001984955,0.0007595244,0.00000300533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002787451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009548099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001185873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001098901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996463,0.002405891,0.0004690415,0.000004928616,0.0004479758,0.0002091774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891077,0.009720152,0.0005531109,0.0003373816,0.0002048884,0.0000768228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005740551,0.00001369184,0.000783754,0.000005879011,0.00005051952,2.129835e-8,0.9263697,0.00009051414,0.00000142734,0.04383759,0.002623834,0.02616566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002594769,0.00006010897,0.0005000728,0.00003414403,0.00007194464,0.000008845744,0.4786363,0.0004140247,0.000085066,0.07557338,0.4443102,0.00004647305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609526,0.0002978222,0.0003226621,0.01255104,0.0005099471,0.0001745593,0.000002058125,0.000005276204,0.02518404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972445,0.0006821476,0.0000275637,0.001477461,0.0005351334,0.000001027674,1.687827e-7,0.000003048034,0.00002899572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4477334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142875752","doi":"10.15353/joci.v1i2.2043","title":"Sustaining Community Access to Technology: Who Should Pay and Why.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Government (linguistics); Digital divide; Public relations; Business; The Internet; Service (business); Order (exchange); Internet access; Public administration; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09888296790255366,"gpt":0.4018654311179178,"spread":0.3029824632153642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00493247,0.00009926136,0.000243086,0.0002063264,0.002732198,0.0001919948,0.001814671,0.0001425805,0.00001793466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002367018,0.00006419992,0.00004173862,0.0004821505,0.000645885,0.0008190312,0.0005084742,0.002443951,0.000006045575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001356956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002343978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001669909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002262704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973324,0.001443224,0.0005237609,0.000005623164,0.0003885696,0.0003064149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965392,0.002106759,0.0003959138,0.0003546931,0.0004152437,0.0001882309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001685789,0.0000469644,0.004301833,0.0000231447,0.00002989908,1.502743e-7,0.9552876,0.00006740484,0.000004346867,0.003669542,0.008186988,0.02836526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001964029,0.0001198344,0.001187253,0.00006349316,0.00003968352,0.00001393623,0.8070716,0.00001755312,0.0001195452,0.007146075,0.1839414,0.00008321027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474571,0.00005418194,0.0004856573,0.0423748,0.0001433712,0.0001403838,0.000003186171,0.00002929876,0.009312026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914269,0.0003495823,0.0003929901,0.007567317,0.0001998541,0.000001148116,5.287424e-7,0.000006405183,0.00005522267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1757544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131238888","doi":"10.15353/joci.v1i2.2041","title":"A Way Forward: Sustainable ICTs And Regional Sustainability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Business; Information and Communications Technology; Citizen journalism; Government (linguistics); Sustainable development; Action (physics); Action research; Participatory action research; ICTS; Knowledge management; Process management; Environmental planning; Economic growth; Political science; Management; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02174034382448187,"gpt":0.2499124473334635,"spread":0.2281721035089816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004805084,0.0001009513,0.000174216,0.0001826605,0.0009125106,0.00008586237,0.0005504626,0.00007971124,0.00001024275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005908568,0.00006730374,0.0000384848,0.0003539567,0.0003419613,0.001425064,0.0005105242,0.0008571553,0.000006057784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001322278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007457882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005459724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001247569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989923,0.00006255238,0.0005168752,0.000008213768,0.0002092879,0.0002107586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979656,0.0001780493,0.0005905449,0.0002206636,0.001036798,0.000008319899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002225879,0.0003030397,0.004939659,0.0008647668,0.0001833996,0.000001747414,0.114643,0.0002805127,0.000003919656,0.7905582,0.03129524,0.05670393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006166117,0.00004005537,0.01158102,0.00002628236,0.00005576007,0.00004651456,0.5174841,0.0004332247,0.00002844786,0.1800717,0.2894687,0.0001476318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744473,0.00003882822,0.002420423,0.009170749,0.00003847941,0.0001516386,2.125554e-7,0.00002019205,0.01371214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955178,0.00003694764,0.0005747172,0.003546677,0.0001410541,0.000001791646,0.00000219415,0.000005192564,0.0001736275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6104865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7018386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564788774","doi":"10.15353/joci.v10i3.3438","title":"Smart Cities vs. Smart Communities: Empowering Citizens not Market Economics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Smart city; Business; Environmental economics; Economics; Internet of Things; Computer science; Internet privacy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02072916448447737,"gpt":0.238399999223423,"spread":0.2176708347389456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002685187,0.0002059871,0.0003793397,0.0001879073,0.0004972722,0.0001454209,0.001099324,0.00008221679,0.00008527125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008935783,0.0001579677,0.0001219207,0.00008761916,0.0001866029,0.0005361019,0.0001883222,0.001323098,0.00002256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008955966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003496656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001506703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001111235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983386,0.0003519364,0.0008497981,0.000002473823,0.0001560976,0.0003010475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972872,0.001532599,0.0003117448,0.0006499887,0.0001167911,0.0001016983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001038436,0.00002718533,0.0007928871,0.00034086,0.0002561158,6.882355e-8,0.9351799,0.03088981,0.0000268718,0.0007453752,0.02917758,0.002459468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001103235,0.0004864707,0.006360404,0.0003216142,0.0001498123,0.000536674,0.8060013,0.02997267,0.001573059,0.001592594,0.151373,0.0005291747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.931549,0.00003326428,0.001614885,0.0002466585,0.0004596668,0.00005740364,0.00001946712,0.00006428032,0.06595539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973943,0.0008556413,0.0001355071,0.001332255,0.0001006702,7.724306e-7,0.000005492639,0.00002772909,0.0001476724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1291786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6441736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764416848","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i3.3278","title":"Urban Data in the primary classroom: bringing data literacy to the UK curriculum","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Context (archaeology); Everyday life; Computer science; Premise; Narrative; Mathematics education; Qualitative property; Literacy; Data science; Pedagogy; Multimedia; Psychology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06207645175822331,"gpt":0.3415265119577447,"spread":0.2794500601995214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01032816,0.0001068782,0.0001590193,0.0001192985,0.0004146683,0.000504267,0.02156011,0.00002562836,0.000006485788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008213759,0.00003991766,0.00002665224,0.0006209756,0.00006940256,0.003235563,0.005960946,0.0006919615,0.00003673333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003841399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001199237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004480985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005136657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975425,0.0008827373,0.0007736,0.00002242867,0.0005783765,0.0002003632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925676,0.001405486,0.0005378266,0.005260748,0.0001697443,0.00005858384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001322477,0.0002493715,0.002662261,0.00006110557,0.00006850927,0.000002359133,0.1979362,0.0002026331,0.00001327234,0.00700416,0.6952955,0.09649144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009344607,0.0001876494,0.006905927,0.0006634166,0.00008334704,0.0004447446,0.03404683,0.1771394,0.00001564165,0.001211594,0.7780603,0.0003066076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05062902,0.0001320834,0.9276553,0.01902408,0.000294135,0.0002011051,0.0001149249,0.00002118405,0.001928117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788511,0.000373738,0.005968119,0.01447115,0.0001763121,5.361136e-7,0.00007569544,0.000007262568,0.00007611125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9837337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526920615","doi":"10.15353/joci.v8i2.3040","title":"Guidelines for Designing Deliberative Digital Habitats: Learning from e-Participation for Open Data Initiatives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Deliberation; Dimension (graph theory); Scholarship; Field (mathematics); Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Public participation; Citizen science; Public relations; Management science; Computer science; Engineering; Politics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4732942729117602,"gpt":0.4999669943495533,"spread":0.02667272143779303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005118653,0.0000818967,0.0002075811,0.00003775742,0.001654461,0.0003146994,0.001531612,0.00005933605,0.000007505208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02004825,0.00005876954,0.00004773741,0.00009529015,0.0001971174,0.004771441,0.0003281867,0.0003595187,0.000003133759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005827333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002730719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003159596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001129377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980703,0.0007217751,0.0006888387,0.000008565051,0.0002472321,0.0002632879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878461,0.009894948,0.000809851,0.0002201994,0.001109828,0.0001190234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076743,0.00005862238,0.002371952,0.00001417865,0.00009331337,8.828753e-9,0.9784298,0.0001325603,0.000008822002,0.002108166,0.007081234,0.009624626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005540002,0.0001757349,0.000552872,0.0000714023,0.0001326022,7.738678e-7,0.9407371,0.0008605583,0.0001994185,0.009596499,0.04702167,0.0000973231],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7998331,0.000222016,0.192131,0.002901009,0.0005943498,0.0007488417,0.0001857922,0.00001784401,0.003366117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813719,0.00008282076,0.01691498,0.0007486955,0.0007282124,0.000009479293,0.0001047496,0.000008816117,0.00003027683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1815389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546527475","doi":"10.15353/joci.v9i3.3152","title":"Digital Habitats – stewarding technology for communities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Habitat; Environmental stewardship; Space (punctuation); Environmental resource management; Community of practice; Ecology; Geography; Computer science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Knowledge management; Political science; Biology; Social science; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03892077289394032,"gpt":0.2485637895788746,"spread":0.2096430166849343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001715299,0.000111909,0.0002154259,0.0003591376,0.0009811921,0.0002079763,0.001168027,0.0001072926,0.00001494418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003444637,0.00007497906,0.00005987617,0.0004285709,0.0004030878,0.001936006,0.0005429454,0.0008815887,0.00004310137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003698286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002632689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000243939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000531546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990386,0.00002709763,0.0005981749,0.000004336554,0.0001482335,0.0001835486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997732,0.0003638179,0.0007575771,0.0002829931,0.0008588901,0.00000473558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001413715,0.0004908115,0.02317719,0.0009751755,0.0008169429,3.294075e-7,0.1621571,0.0002232943,0.00009056553,0.4283692,0.06059066,0.3229674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005108309,0.00006293541,0.002081668,0.00007452595,0.00004212859,0.00002397071,0.8068916,0.0003852564,0.0001064822,0.1583847,0.03128456,0.0001514298],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662394,0.00002177088,0.01133009,0.002781122,0.0001803038,0.0002577273,0.00000152548,0.00005422453,0.01913385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974559,0.000008760326,0.001098108,0.001268088,0.00008346236,0.0000110831,0.000007815202,0.000009302503,0.00005750407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6447344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7546635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252027226","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i2.3219","title":"Open Data Intermediaries in Developing Countries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Intermediary; Business; Grassroots; Social capital; Open data; Capital (architecture); Industrial organization; Computer science; Marketing; World Wide Web; Political science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07140554424817427,"gpt":0.3457310237497503,"spread":0.274325479501576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003320611,0.00007969805,0.0002269862,0.00008459909,0.0001880362,0.0001280375,0.00446407,0.0000148191,0.00007844674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005008962,0.00003992795,0.00002642898,0.0001400576,0.0001850706,0.00130152,0.003032605,0.0003517271,0.000007548261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004077553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000149072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001550174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001311505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987423,0.0002965737,0.0006839911,0.000006961941,0.0001496131,0.0001205205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975002,0.0009546201,0.0005874938,0.0007938732,0.0001391373,0.00002463838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003716106,0.0003193382,0.0764073,0.00009757894,0.0009633516,9.451622e-7,0.2508294,0.0001527741,0.00004417019,0.1861969,0.1612037,0.3234129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00250413,0.0002363208,0.01136309,0.001915186,0.0002353196,0.00004679077,0.1430468,0.001234808,0.001604815,0.1864092,0.6508335,0.0005700691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7053717,0.00003441262,0.283268,0.006093066,0.00007624961,0.0001581093,0.00003056181,0.00001103753,0.004956853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969478,0.0001245134,0.002409985,0.00043257,0.00004953266,7.855625e-7,0.000008113947,0.000004414011,0.00002234144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4896298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8295428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932503041","doi":"10.15353/joci.v7i3.2593","title":"Participant-Making: bridging the gulf between community knowledge and academic research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Bridging (networking); Public relations; Knowledge sharing; Process (computing); Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5096046980774813,"gpt":0.5002426183993148,"spread":0.00936207967816649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05457594,0.00008046752,0.000185778,0.0001317294,0.006736901,0.0001213367,0.001427218,0.00007521914,0.0000331554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001226021,0.00004638982,0.00004311423,0.0003798627,0.0009636912,0.001160415,0.0004148289,0.002876365,0.00002099666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008557945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001954176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001578131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004705937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899567,0.00810564,0.001037063,0.000005648852,0.0005667724,0.0003282179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943216,0.003707499,0.0007924878,0.0003761656,0.0007190802,0.00008310053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001893836,0.00001347041,0.001629669,0.0000306785,0.00003340655,1.711186e-8,0.9764209,0.000003236054,0.00000252264,0.01189376,0.001642553,0.008310846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001937321,0.0001242606,0.008429749,0.00009298643,0.00004619088,0.00001295919,0.9484285,0.00003188472,0.0000575201,0.00829087,0.03423348,0.00005791822],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584299,0.00009546977,0.001981525,0.000785852,0.0001293144,0.0002266653,0.000004690274,0.00001194018,0.03833466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992614,0.0002445232,0.00007017111,0.0002137037,0.0001612216,0.000002074737,0.000001497926,0.000004639633,0.00004080316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05334992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606870379","doi":"10.15353/joci.v1i1.2060","title":"n-Logue: The Story of a Rural Service Provider In India","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"ICT in Developing Communities","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ingenuity; Digital divide; Developing country; The Internet; Economic growth; Disadvantaged; Information and Communications Technology; Business; Rural area; Population; Political science; Economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02888628654159052,"gpt":0.2590023005093907,"spread":0.2301160139678002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006129255,0.0001129574,0.0002201494,0.0001971186,0.0005015307,0.00007437744,0.005580633,0.00004921645,0.000001572412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002769878,0.00006321566,0.00005222465,0.0006359029,0.0001973066,0.001063275,0.001086395,0.002259804,0.000007349979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001248155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004763281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002599695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001232972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973064,0.001291521,0.0007754202,0.000004480476,0.0004378846,0.0001842618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995989,0.001597513,0.0008529517,0.001126384,0.0004025408,0.00003156543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018994,0.00008578771,0.0001268194,0.0001095325,0.00003630775,3.969142e-7,0.9829103,0.006409724,0.00001798902,0.007332096,0.0003640928,0.002587915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002114488,0.0005304794,0.05645232,0.001091015,0.0000396913,0.0009449771,0.8806302,0.001641786,0.001308088,0.05259277,0.002339959,0.0003142516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786646,0.0001327147,0.01444307,0.005020715,0.000213058,0.0001282856,0.00000104474,0.00001484567,0.001381609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927571,0.00008142372,0.004634311,0.002500172,0.0000143017,0.000001104725,6.037118e-7,0.000004563653,0.000006353782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1022802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128733735","doi":"10.15353/joci.v8i2.3047","title":"Trustworthy Records and Open Data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Open government; Government (linguistics); Open data; Enthusiasm; Trustworthiness; Computer science; Key (lock); Data science; Value (mathematics); Business; Public relations; Computer security; World Wide Web; Political science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1621220009993434,"gpt":0.2891926638970974,"spread":0.127070662897754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001551438,0.0000524937,0.0001020426,0.0000362325,0.0004414626,0.0002809016,0.001482712,0.000003752959,0.00009274168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002993315,0.00002913805,0.00001557798,0.00001436385,0.0001696708,0.002993068,0.001366917,0.0002783148,0.00002309879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000536064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001239188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006323883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003978075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993736,0.0001068811,0.0003017648,0.000003199192,0.0001242202,0.00009029769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990573,0.0002734207,0.0002542658,0.0003233317,0.00004028423,0.00005142994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006648327,0.000256922,0.0001345107,0.00006958043,0.0001721135,1.246043e-7,0.4343445,0.000009382941,1.195563e-7,0.3828753,0.08373644,0.09833456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000222128,0.000133549,0.004060708,0.00003647069,0.00006265008,0.00004931057,0.1099775,0.00006371537,7.798162e-7,0.02597786,0.8593532,0.0000621154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.36362,0.00004279857,0.00009952037,0.0006905282,0.0001988081,0.00006843836,0.00004907552,0.00000402434,0.6352268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978025,0.0001178125,0.0001705066,0.0009692763,0.0001663468,2.847192e-7,0.00002503532,0.000003080188,0.0007451468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7756168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3395418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498064686","doi":"10.15353/joci.v8i1.3062","title":"Online Communities As A Resource In Older Adults’ Tourism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Sharing Economy and Platforms","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Netnography; Tourism; Ethnography; Resource (disambiguation); Subject (documents); Gerontology; Psychology; Medical tourism; Sociology; Public relations; Advertising; Marketing; Business; Medicine; Geography; World Wide Web; Political science; Social media; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03322127748944632,"gpt":0.2443879251624723,"spread":0.211166647673026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003074073,0.0001167132,0.0002105367,0.0002619909,0.0003431131,0.000115538,0.0009320466,0.00005931795,0.0001155245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001281939,0.00007623884,0.00006297833,0.0002085856,0.00007050096,0.002783051,0.0003593829,0.001285125,0.00008203965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002955976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001645687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001498028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003289957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988548,0.00006055682,0.0006753031,0.000003868235,0.0001755278,0.0002299914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983109,0.0004608959,0.0007178764,0.0003827217,0.0001101482,0.00001747533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007521677,0.002231418,0.09316355,0.001153458,0.0001946727,0.00000215265,0.8095161,0.001629889,0.000001941431,0.006209115,0.03756384,0.04758166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001474723,0.00004290858,0.08743022,0.0005791807,0.00006544455,0.0001269454,0.8179088,0.001312514,0.00001154757,0.002480251,0.08835502,0.0002124989],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.975902,0.0001141219,0.00004763106,0.0004760141,0.0001413793,0.00008652826,0.00000156985,0.00001517866,0.02321563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994422,0.00004505566,0.000076983,0.005006537,0.0003831437,6.875563e-7,0.00001868238,0.000008736636,0.00003823154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05079119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5583299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557720241","doi":"10.15353/joci.v12i3.3276","title":"Data Literacy defined pro populo: To read this article, please provide a little information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Context (archaeology); Information literacy; Data science; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; World Wide Web; Geography; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2366070300383545,"gpt":0.428376994059941,"spread":0.1917699640215865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0235543,0.0001312378,0.0002735161,0.000334411,0.000427888,0.0006606888,0.005369297,0.00004190849,0.0002302251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01849109,0.00005966127,0.00006222047,0.0006223833,0.0001416432,0.01069716,0.002314499,0.0004351205,0.001251608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006385246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001365405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001654523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949337,0.001090295,0.002197299,0.00001997641,0.001519034,0.000239706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990966,0.003413513,0.00153774,0.00298856,0.0009022576,0.0001919623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003454648,0.0001394741,0.0001510114,0.00004918261,0.00004859113,4.318281e-7,0.1104418,0.00007021913,0.0000216524,0.003086042,0.3131202,0.5725259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008575722,0.0003526767,0.001805582,0.0001852616,0.00006112874,0.00006178748,0.06127736,0.0007955995,0.0001297975,0.01695847,0.9173588,0.0001560143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7868678,0.00003472922,0.1573331,0.04292443,0.0004537359,0.0007491406,0.0007293688,0.00004641041,0.01086129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776579,0.00009817712,0.009592902,0.01151683,0.00008263875,0.000004427068,0.0000575442,0.000008525069,0.0009810275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6042385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167527998","doi":"10.15353/joci.v2i1.2099","title":"The modal nature of ICT: challenging the historical interpretation of the social understanding and appropriation of ICT.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information and Communications Technology; Appropriation; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Power (physics); Modal; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04580023245044954,"gpt":0.3318921708374725,"spread":0.2860919383870229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006253482,0.00005416767,0.0001385108,0.00004511689,0.001680029,0.00003652833,0.0005167576,0.00006572128,0.000003403655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003260812,0.00002491322,0.00007261226,0.0001780937,0.0002999789,0.000551628,0.00008165242,0.0005108423,1.399065e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002932925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009112463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001499481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002081347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977641,0.0007560409,0.0008533729,0.000005134733,0.0005313825,0.00008995926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966575,0.0009172105,0.001932859,0.0001433064,0.0003348521,0.0000142679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005107495,0.00001140092,0.00005752481,0.00004379154,0.00003688285,1.259794e-9,0.8888097,0.0006288842,0.00001830245,0.1052736,0.0002677846,0.00480101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002618509,0.00006015164,0.0007057589,0.0000583965,0.0000455849,0.000003485182,0.9853823,0.003876908,0.0001338455,0.006578502,0.002859473,0.00003380383],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512457,0.0001892869,0.03094054,0.008381085,0.0004354789,0.0003336769,0.000006856698,0.00000477338,0.008462588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995957,0.0001760583,0.00004988003,0.00008351522,0.00007595254,5.955307e-7,7.137925e-7,0.000002239649,0.00001534879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09869512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099938256","doi":"10.15353/joci.v1i2.2048","title":"An Interpretivist Case Study of a South African Rural Multi-Purpose Community Centre","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Rural community; Hermeneutics; Actor–network theory; ICTS; Case study research; Regional science; Social science; Information and Communications Technology; Political science; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Socioeconomics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05614069106844963,"gpt":0.3741326253293435,"spread":0.3179919342608939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009211891,0.0001063249,0.0002523496,0.0001340002,0.002174905,0.0001165794,0.0009611848,0.0000406628,0.0000428397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000248206,0.00007393581,0.00006490557,0.0002512965,0.0002716692,0.001603735,0.0001364536,0.0008748748,0.000005279754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001374603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001168963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01452554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935119,0.004581397,0.001262083,0.000004906336,0.0004567501,0.0001830034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965216,0.0005750483,0.001654707,0.0004851016,0.0006570052,0.0001065558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006243416,0.0004567018,0.0008062249,0.00002212867,0.00004317983,4.49973e-7,0.9913383,0.0003677737,0.000004910884,0.000250597,0.00008949926,0.006557864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001001778,0.0006035232,0.0003967547,0.00003807194,0.00005517312,0.000146797,0.9960322,0.0004919049,0.00002847153,0.00004210908,0.001086397,0.00007684787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994266,0.00000459093,0.002978588,0.0001210978,0.00009714499,0.0003518753,0.00001819565,0.00001393867,0.002148525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994456,0.000007125328,0.0003211732,0.0001454837,0.00005147044,0.000001001415,0.000003864674,0.00000499814,0.00001925505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008963685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1960924819","doi":"10.15353/joci.v8i2.3037","title":"The Rhetoric of Transparency and its Reality: Transparent Territories, Opaque Power and Empowerment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Urban and Rural Development Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Empowerment; Governmentality; Rhetoric; Corporate governance; Visibility; Power (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Geography; Business; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07724719641574015,"gpt":0.3228252674506054,"spread":0.2455780710348653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004263936,0.00008114232,0.0001696713,0.00003335444,0.00096507,0.00003487608,0.0004145927,0.00005011556,0.000008459539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008920057,0.0000419112,0.00003325103,0.00008874875,0.0002934278,0.0004401378,0.00004464786,0.000402619,4.64677e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000431056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008257505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000175095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004373108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982988,0.0005769892,0.0005484217,0.000005781912,0.0003811329,0.0001889129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986551,0.0005909358,0.0003683106,0.000136474,0.0001338437,0.0001153786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003976121,0.00006744223,0.0009738322,0.00005533201,0.00006368328,4.90639e-8,0.9829648,0.000001932343,0.00001185887,0.01197068,0.0006347592,0.003215882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005924675,0.000322118,0.06842265,0.0001899542,0.0001199953,0.00003351106,0.772526,0.000007246514,0.0002162356,0.002458779,0.1549347,0.0001763211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778037,0.005867832,0.00007795078,0.005698549,0.0005102779,0.0001488275,0.000008033664,0.000006690389,0.009878111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757793,0.02402018,0.00003043474,0.00005986638,0.00004841341,6.154466e-7,6.241507e-7,0.0000028202,0.00005777754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2104388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7422636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}