{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"d279af7f52ba","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Legal History"}},"results":[{"id":"W2007696805","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2012.698885","title":"Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; English law; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Equity (law); Common law; House of Commons; Political science; Economic Justice; Unconscionability; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Waddams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04325816009345367,"gpt":0.3568442583983873,"spread":0.3135860983049337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004217716,0.0002848852,0.0002875052,0.001885866,0.006649045,0.006452793,0.0008718994,0.003717464,0.006017546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006932234,0.000285522,0.0002799536,0.002365711,0.01369575,0.004493503,0.003529404,0.004485718,0.0005114502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007659265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2358133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3086606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959956,0.001044771,0.000147803,0.0003188456,0.001112102,0.001380861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975126,0.00142289,0.0002479489,0.0001158141,0.0004356155,0.0002651629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003395602,0.0000246462,0.001427631,0.00002981093,0.000006665765,0.0004492604,0.03133714,0.000175196,0.00009775347,0.9494157,0.009568561,0.007433632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006101083,0.00008398715,0.05762367,0.000787185,0.00003502896,0.0003719609,0.02655637,0.000638939,0.0009890893,0.1383153,0.7744406,0.00009674129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2646585,0.01800502,0.0009148393,0.02467548,0.0004099894,0.00005561448,0.0002380886,0.00001308735,0.6910294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395392,0.002243944,0.0001945059,0.004254522,0.0002158636,0.0000361989,0.00005253084,0.00001664698,0.05344655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2358133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4688815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130476025","doi":"10.1080/01440360903353948","title":"Felony Forfeiture in England,<i>c.</i>1170–1870","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Continuation; Criminal law; Legal history; Political science; Criminology; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"K. J. Kesselring","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02502216432447268,"gpt":0.1978942750800356,"spread":0.1728721107555629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008403262,0.0001994317,0.000364734,0.001317606,0.005235359,0.001960002,0.0005264821,0.001698327,0.008704012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003098059,0.0004872588,0.0001209646,0.001817487,0.004861508,0.001852792,0.002738929,0.002446296,0.0007328225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01858561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005389054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4843561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.780754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990049,0.0002034753,0.00006902463,0.0001375644,0.0001697411,0.0004153534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986948,0.0003633793,0.0003826293,0.00007157306,0.0002119805,0.0002755539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003971559,0.0001441335,0.07775652,0.001407867,0.00005222077,0.01134444,0.3034974,0.0008238457,0.001068734,0.355362,0.1255804,0.1225652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002815172,0.0001493367,0.3728118,0.001290828,0.00002840392,0.002666488,0.03802454,0.0002101353,0.0004840216,0.00773727,0.5764846,0.00008448936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7570214,0.04517758,0.0007099735,0.0178416,0.0005804352,0.00007250201,0.001864055,0.00004211561,0.1766904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9243584,0.007640413,0.0001733106,0.001442634,0.0001135916,0.00003623255,0.0002817232,0.00002800764,0.06592575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4843561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9630737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008089985","doi":"10.1080/01440360500162676","title":"Defence counsel in early modern Scotland: A study based on the High Court of Justiciary","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Professionalization; Scots; High Court; Political science; Right to counsel; Legal service; Sociology; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Michael Wasser","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03331678790176151,"gpt":0.2063962255187736,"spread":0.1730794376170121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002068096,0.0003514488,0.0008251514,0.004569789,0.01116028,0.004824918,0.001347397,0.001611396,0.005555033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007036027,0.0007475188,0.0002319255,0.007759475,0.004916843,0.002824979,0.003774004,0.002682984,0.000610604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01500305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01252393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3567196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6498761,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966528,0.0007394668,0.00009791258,0.0001595681,0.0008793084,0.001471047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949012,0.001259841,0.001268392,0.0001146452,0.0009250015,0.001530881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006126522,0.0002264883,0.07654447,0.00009107197,0.000006730199,0.002340183,0.9028892,0.00001737627,0.0003054792,0.003934679,0.002038125,0.01154498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001442091,0.0001990464,0.2076046,0.0001581256,0.000008743636,0.0008319957,0.7640537,0.00004106521,0.00006402099,0.0002804659,0.0267183,0.00002554631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940369,0.000527794,0.00003737572,0.001119855,0.00002387413,0.00002092791,0.00006614497,0.00000159137,0.004165572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942203,0.001058816,0.00006146335,0.0007806354,0.00004525179,0.00002288344,0.00005726568,0.00000569135,0.003747777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3567196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7092865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308441574","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2022.2140481","title":"‘Weak’ Legal Pluralism and the Eighteenth-Century English Ecclesiastical Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Politics; Discipline; Economic Justice; Legal history; Classics; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Troy L Harris","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01618286759154583,"gpt":0.191281043353827,"spread":0.1750981757622811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003869036,0.0001223567,0.0001555282,0.001227226,0.004141918,0.00498365,0.0004617179,0.0008752121,0.003470852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005919366,0.0001200494,0.00008586037,0.0007630697,0.01857274,0.002970081,0.003480554,0.002133207,0.0001681643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006112405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00259994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009542854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01843483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966521,0.001652137,0.0001521874,0.0002283677,0.000803688,0.0005115675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956239,0.002035861,0.0006906623,0.0002282459,0.001061189,0.0003601405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001203998,0.00001963905,0.00181753,0.00002926043,0.000002413541,0.0002469943,0.05950779,0.0000456203,0.0001418596,0.9293983,0.001882658,0.00689587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007098723,0.0001080851,0.03060518,0.001037255,0.00001570912,0.000807022,0.09647349,0.0008964351,0.001019923,0.3225912,0.5463219,0.00005289075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5859457,0.0135065,0.001767405,0.03082088,0.0002863486,0.00002011004,0.00004451275,0.00001117378,0.3675974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992453,0.0007339328,0.0001090948,0.0003680109,0.00005332378,0.000004583688,0.000004396611,0.000001867621,0.006271744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009542854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04434884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406919552","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2025.2456268","title":"Jurisdiction over <i>Infangthief</i> in England: The Case of John Milksop","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth F. Duggan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01138246775021285,"gpt":0.2799491271364145,"spread":0.2685666593862016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005733037,0.0002192896,0.0005812155,0.0006933784,0.04253725,0.008945799,0.00175183,0.00860579,0.006553729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01238109,0.0009978879,0.0002074206,0.001058605,0.04232665,0.005033283,0.009433843,0.01192834,0.0004232199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01988501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01784066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4502843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5878271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936021,0.00261855,0.0002309583,0.0005999088,0.0005536625,0.002394836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990563,0.006664807,0.0007006297,0.0003359865,0.0007746223,0.0009609791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005148907,0.00002177151,0.002124282,0.00007305465,0.00000752414,0.007314835,0.6658405,0.0001268225,0.0003775892,0.3154366,0.004647673,0.00397776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000405772,0.00005681963,0.005871755,0.0008469562,0.00003694177,0.0022758,0.6238883,0.0002091511,0.0008831898,0.03972692,0.3259952,0.000168524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7260293,0.004534834,0.001535638,0.0430154,0.0001992953,0.00005657417,0.00004118807,0.00001654669,0.2245712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759379,0.0006546146,0.0001821741,0.00348375,0.0000284521,0.00002186703,0.000005147739,0.00001085524,0.01967527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4502843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8953268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}