{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"d279af7f52ba","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Legal History"}},"results":[{"id":"W2007696805","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2012.698885","title":"Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; English law; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Equity (law); Common law; House of Commons; Political science; Economic Justice; Unconscionability; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04325816009345367,"gpt":0.3568442583983873,"spread":0.3135860983049337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003559444,0.00007940488,0.0001619066,0.00002511054,0.0003399931,0.00001742178,0.0009617469,0.00007339168,0.0001337795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003608942,0.00003421259,0.0002208208,0.0001547628,0.0006704423,0.0004182192,0.00009190851,0.0007261192,0.000004827064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009487829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006446449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009549597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002368059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984583,0.0004672097,0.0002997777,0.00004310902,0.0004535665,0.0002779904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985755,0.0003589114,0.0005270119,0.0002673246,0.0001630427,0.0001082305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002465649,0.0007316203,0.008121475,0.00001454613,0.000155395,0.000002897808,0.2389977,0.0003558439,0.006378372,0.6284802,0.1145726,0.001942797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002245071,0.00003480904,0.07493383,0.00002731132,0.00004842502,0.000007483248,0.001329719,0.000004428674,0.0001073161,0.0007554386,0.9224615,0.00006521679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6620299,0.007851331,0.00001071875,0.005542811,0.001258794,0.0003051427,0.0000101094,0.0000116643,0.3229795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977852,0.0001300051,0.000008326918,0.0003506014,0.0009355861,0.000001553765,1.230096e-7,0.000006431374,0.0007822113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8078889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130476025","doi":"10.1080/01440360903353948","title":"Felony Forfeiture in England,<i>c.</i>1170–1870","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Continuation; Criminal law; Legal history; Political science; Criminology; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02502216432447268,"gpt":0.1978942750800356,"spread":0.1728721107555629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008695482,0.000105057,0.0004310628,0.0001399653,0.00009358037,0.000007226195,0.0002953017,0.00007329015,0.0001408263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001028752,0.00008690589,0.0001507546,0.00008405957,0.00007985046,0.0002138672,0.00001536004,0.000399872,0.00008365809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001374899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005340141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004935011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001843375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989793,0.00003077251,0.0006685407,0.00009108793,0.00003821438,0.0001920786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991959,0.00006262465,0.0005225708,0.0001267341,0.00002969827,0.00006241332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008415927,0.0007576411,0.008015181,0.00002900506,0.0002125643,0.0001503303,0.07236587,0.001117434,0.00008634354,0.5363604,0.35422,0.02584366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006045417,0.0001367651,0.01097564,0.000007826088,0.000005499291,0.00001567488,0.0001090049,0.00002443511,0.000002339787,0.008497389,0.9795124,0.0001084886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4616629,0.1305231,0.0009305538,0.008492408,0.004205986,0.0002197938,0.0000204581,0.00002667624,0.3939181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923878,0.0009546095,0.00007893363,0.001130699,0.0005092827,7.38182e-7,3.659058e-7,0.000008665602,0.004928877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6252924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3595314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008089985","doi":"10.1080/01440360500162676","title":"Defence counsel in early modern Scotland: A study based on the High Court of Justiciary","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Professionalization; Scots; High Court; Political science; Right to counsel; Legal service; Sociology; Supreme court","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03331678790176151,"gpt":0.2063962255187736,"spread":0.1730794376170121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001762828,0.0001042591,0.0004251908,0.0001311679,0.0001101612,0.000006345106,0.0003737212,0.00004308772,0.00009285361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001240815,0.000073774,0.000108989,0.00008178702,0.0001618386,0.0001215588,0.0000190967,0.0003530773,0.00004037565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001168815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009679591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001665444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004121477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988543,0.0000771118,0.0007293159,0.0000985611,0.00008901817,0.0001516551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987116,0.0003246094,0.0006889985,0.0001861444,0.0000497096,0.00003891642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004054244,0.008410997,0.1418695,0.0001161528,0.0009540158,0.0001233678,0.2817361,0.1359874,0.00009386386,0.2484353,0.172575,0.005644031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007470752,0.003705126,0.2761776,0.0002001292,0.0002524501,0.00001628221,0.004927075,0.03152844,0.00001710298,0.0166181,0.6580265,0.001060532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797952,0.00624513,0.0008997096,0.001798724,0.000585995,0.000164516,0.0000109603,0.000004345836,0.01049545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984855,0.0001491156,0.00004520532,0.0005551924,0.0001953168,0.000003265454,1.013311e-7,0.00001139276,0.0005549153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4854515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.305641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308441574","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2022.2140481","title":"‘Weak’ Legal Pluralism and the Eighteenth-Century English Ecclesiastical Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Politics; Discipline; Economic Justice; Legal history; Classics; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01618286759154583,"gpt":0.191281043353827,"spread":0.1750981757622811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001262874,0.0001098736,0.0002031167,0.00006964567,0.0009501062,0.00008998133,0.0003355636,0.00001723763,0.002439751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006021858,0.00005646901,0.0001222916,0.00001413603,0.0007695801,0.0004282827,0.00009857531,0.0007295029,0.000009944381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002869802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001353959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003322106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004741426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984915,0.0004007116,0.0003814434,0.00006014707,0.0005083506,0.0001578443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991162,0.0001720289,0.0003198444,0.0001508521,0.000166022,0.00007503347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007955141,0.00008213499,0.000007307326,0.00001156635,0.0000732913,0.00002620411,0.1211673,0.00006865097,0.0000113835,0.513832,0.3632331,0.0006915004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009794077,0.0001008941,0.00009788417,0.00000733281,0.00007660077,0.0001869133,0.007131017,0.0002698125,0.00000154811,0.0002182765,0.9908484,0.00008191438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5807978,0.0401249,0.0001744007,0.01244463,0.01555081,0.0004661992,0.00005798117,0.00008691502,0.3502964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920651,0.0003201761,0.000007137564,0.001219389,0.001242584,0.000002640531,0.000001700738,0.00001225766,0.005129021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6276153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406919552","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2025.2456268","title":"Jurisdiction over <i>Infangthief</i> in England: The Case of John Milksop","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01138246775021285,"gpt":0.2799491271364145,"spread":0.2685666593862016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002878319,0.00006415499,0.0001510097,0.0001570983,0.0002391957,0.00001072175,0.0002404259,0.00006454997,0.0001223821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001110664,0.00003925472,0.000104629,0.0002235134,0.0003270768,0.0002135299,0.0000229597,0.0003672606,0.000001539723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003937256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004746757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01216961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01282239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987649,0.0004374249,0.0003757205,0.000050974,0.0002434248,0.0001275147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990655,0.0003140737,0.0003129012,0.000140341,0.0001318292,0.00003536377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001969267,0.0006251844,0.005493172,0.00009330326,0.0002976192,0.0009698341,0.4998434,0.0004558112,0.004662207,0.1269608,0.2573222,0.1013072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004522352,0.00005137606,0.002465732,0.00004336912,0.00005917113,0.00008556424,0.001977233,0.00002852724,0.00004923025,0.0003113242,0.9944357,0.00004058805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8747801,0.008268927,0.0000966942,0.004874773,0.00232223,0.0001334851,0.000001896123,0.000009782796,0.1095121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944595,0.0007443216,0.00001135034,0.0004437622,0.0003533345,0.000001005312,1.128642e-7,0.000003997519,0.003982644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7371135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}