{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":10,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"a3030f52f59b","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W2322860346","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2007.10756611","title":"After<i>Marshall</i>: Implementation of Aboriginal Fishing Rights in Atlantic Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Livelihood; Constitution; Political science; Natural resource; First nation; Treaty; Fishing; Population; Colonialism; Law; Indigenous; Public administration; Geography; Sociology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Melanie G. Wiber","is_ca":false},{"name":"Chris Milley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01008217523190975,"gpt":0.3409372679045676,"spread":0.3308550926726578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004702338,0.0001538167,0.0001890504,0.0007483731,0.02039449,0.005512021,0.001815792,0.002029103,0.006320608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007275837,0.000153638,0.0002370722,0.0008621012,0.006883693,0.001306891,0.003723553,0.004006935,0.0002376267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08352449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2168024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936871,0.0005377195,0.00009070326,0.0002737865,0.001577931,0.003832696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935989,0.0007964288,0.0002795251,0.0002268725,0.002938564,0.002159668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001093606,0.0002443119,0.07551844,0.000239259,0.00003991767,0.002149486,0.2367052,0.0009669483,0.002692763,0.437185,0.09412722,0.1500221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004396407,0.000141068,0.1469476,0.0006498761,0.00006362318,0.0003631106,0.198161,0.001193469,0.002729286,0.01341557,0.6361585,0.0001330402],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5092843,0.003001266,0.001278672,0.163703,0.0005805549,0.0002638878,0.0003009926,0.00005201606,0.3215353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9110147,0.0009333278,0.0009976744,0.01212943,0.00004749474,0.00004717914,0.00005647692,0.00001769552,0.074756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08352449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6060154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504609123","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2013.857537","title":"Who Owns the Stock? Collective and Multiple Property Rights in Animals","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Stock (firearms); Business; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Geography; Political science; Economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Scott Simon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009778196910186906,"gpt":0.2006077158296867,"spread":0.1908295189194998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003897236,0.00008255162,0.0002209133,0.0004702167,0.002739479,0.003054458,0.0005617223,0.002418991,0.02779508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008413387,0.0001616497,0.0002201235,0.0003643482,0.0059669,0.005251232,0.001986886,0.00176441,0.00111821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009230355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009188614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007126727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01680966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989246,0.0003952646,0.00004945506,0.0001566132,0.000241094,0.0002329663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950689,0.003081176,0.000531442,0.0004847393,0.0003330351,0.0005006166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001630379,0.0002950559,0.04163529,0.00005501346,0.00003399712,0.001037444,0.02114321,0.0003739441,0.003792164,0.8116071,0.02186155,0.09800227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008445814,0.0002306711,0.08152854,0.0004034294,0.00008257975,0.002250241,0.04253554,0.003718838,0.00462683,0.6072592,0.2571663,0.0001134269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4813587,0.001073541,0.01048194,0.04213514,0.0002990313,0.00003561845,0.00009842619,0.0000357463,0.4644819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651521,0.0002708447,0.001563625,0.001448214,0.0001185341,0.0000277995,0.00001827031,0.00001849605,0.03138213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02779508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09298378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170618924","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2021.1925458","title":"Resistance and the paradox of legal entitlement – a theoretical analysis of migrant women’s responses to domestic abuse in the host country","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Hegemony; Resistance (ecology); Portuguese; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Gender studies; Affect (linguistics); Cultural hegemony; Consciousness; Legal consciousness; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Politics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"S. Graça","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008542880335254951,"gpt":0.2957715536041562,"spread":0.2872286732689012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005324507,0.0003951685,0.0003919298,0.002069109,0.01245647,0.009177354,0.001434807,0.002950539,0.003724613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006134972,0.000311671,0.000397397,0.001278011,0.0382681,0.006072593,0.006832243,0.003681873,0.0002010321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005821916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002964531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008925491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006827346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943115,0.004412045,0.00007109872,0.000254812,0.0003127634,0.0006377173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966433,0.002225277,0.0004312215,0.0002308697,0.0002086562,0.0002606874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001718046,0.00002643529,0.001284849,0.0000386112,0.000004431554,0.0007201527,0.7944348,0.00009569925,0.000217664,0.2004991,0.0003608041,0.002300171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001079416,0.00004590457,0.00225443,0.0001298212,0.000006672069,0.0005427692,0.9436163,0.0004786567,0.0001446223,0.03119959,0.02155703,0.00001344639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8321918,0.001128917,0.003464712,0.01965427,0.00008955828,0.00005455445,0.00001552832,0.00001544524,0.1433852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978516,0.0001754721,0.0001410778,0.0002453475,0.00001171744,0.00001472392,0.00000294542,0.000004806805,0.001552224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01245647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04224116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299369703","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2002.10756562","title":"Indigenous Rights and Customary Law Discourse","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Indigenous rights; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legitimacy; Precedent; Customary international law; Indigenous; International law; Comparative law; Sociology; Human rights; Public international law; Legal realism; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Tom G. Svensson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01270719863640762,"gpt":0.2637151213312559,"spread":0.2510079226948482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00608533,0.0004758566,0.0005086237,0.002677925,0.02968071,0.01339497,0.002955249,0.003673125,0.006155684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006117583,0.0003514187,0.0003493292,0.003454523,0.07713075,0.005993872,0.007883905,0.004545287,0.0002900284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1290912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1084591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9680742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9753307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937958,0.001201218,0.0001872352,0.0009103075,0.001841044,0.002064508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948335,0.002159466,0.0004053614,0.0003529608,0.001218727,0.001029949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119406,0.00001565508,0.001282043,0.00007642651,0.000006822209,0.0005164182,0.2874994,0.0002289303,0.0002827475,0.6943884,0.005592769,0.01009848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001953983,0.00002237532,0.008431269,0.0009761248,0.00002866649,0.0003228747,0.3440327,0.0004785236,0.0005254601,0.07514693,0.5698872,0.0001284412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2682897,0.01413236,0.002194599,0.03887485,0.0006780549,0.00005023012,0.0001877644,0.00006965673,0.6755227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699891,0.001983257,0.0005961257,0.002119604,0.00007403266,0.00001373865,0.00003882363,0.00003375414,0.02515165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9366264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406526351","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2015.1072387","title":"Indigenous legal traditions and Canadian<i>Bhinneka Tunggal Ika</i>: Indonesian lessons for legal pluralism in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Indonesian; Legitimacy; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Legal formalism; Legal realism; Law; Legal research; Politics; Comparative law; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Kenji Tokawa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0291916373430658,"gpt":0.2752625748395076,"spread":0.2460709374964418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00258768,0.0002717991,0.0004465888,0.001449702,0.04956769,0.01084727,0.0019742,0.002268174,0.006864015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003938715,0.0003508616,0.0003655093,0.003026236,0.01480942,0.002600481,0.00436146,0.007611318,0.0002502211],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1841242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2674989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970194,0.0003017348,0.00007428121,0.0003080286,0.000918374,0.001378196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949086,0.0008045631,0.0002536574,0.0001207869,0.001932682,0.001979679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001024953,0.0001483838,0.01719714,0.0003890567,0.00004666593,0.002482618,0.2183548,0.0006392308,0.000982615,0.6028169,0.0838296,0.07301057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003829354,0.00003964321,0.04280952,0.0009662638,0.00008855255,0.0005408921,0.2768089,0.001028696,0.0007417406,0.02695907,0.6497331,0.0002454355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3344178,0.02107093,0.0009342924,0.2402602,0.001019338,0.0001234902,0.0003894499,0.00006574926,0.4017187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9285569,0.01030584,0.001399351,0.01253252,0.0001015023,0.00003155473,0.0001050958,0.0000480447,0.04691933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1841242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9463003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414777334","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2016.1157377","title":"Aboriginal healing lodges in Canada: still going strong? Still worth implementing in the USA?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Politics; Indian country; Appropriation; State (computer science); Culturally appropriate; Law; Recidivism; Intervention (counseling); Political science; Indigenous rights; Public administration; Sociology; Medicine; Criminology; Nursing; Gerontology","authors":[{"name":"Marianne O. Nielsen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01814318565789278,"gpt":0.3069343476751671,"spread":0.2887911620172743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002747038,0.0003046287,0.0004531868,0.001330071,0.01702395,0.006698496,0.001708202,0.001774647,0.006079928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00835139,0.0002428012,0.0004068586,0.003127983,0.004303372,0.002308892,0.002715405,0.003561399,0.0003528491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08987345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3657805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957755,0.000449527,0.00007634146,0.0002190155,0.001123357,0.002356365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873504,0.0005112927,0.0004309177,0.0002240083,0.006423451,0.005059957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004955428,0.0005665527,0.1684441,0.001592736,0.0001946132,0.001975165,0.04674309,0.0009969864,0.001954819,0.06691877,0.2538797,0.456238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009223486,0.0002225914,0.3764882,0.003020168,0.0003334403,0.0003768664,0.2323973,0.0009973418,0.001199549,0.006028235,0.3785431,0.0003008871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4466142,0.02185716,0.0007751973,0.4212449,0.001751624,0.0002351841,0.001135256,0.0001759674,0.1062106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282349,0.01783268,0.002802172,0.02387127,0.0001386152,0.00009080389,0.0005871124,0.00007228706,0.02637007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08987345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6520805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246122024","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2015.1012370","title":"Postface","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jacques Vanderlinden","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04440362861438783,"gpt":0.279382289124074,"spread":0.2349786605096861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031896,0.002048577,0.002869274,0.02627046,0.003279493,0.01714527,0.003720344,0.003286193,0.8719699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02279145,0.001063812,0.001503711,0.02873491,0.002182754,0.009127281,0.00832051,0.002597776,0.7237395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001866228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00956345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005035191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006026283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996428,0.0003359014,0.0006868909,0.0005217482,0.001374315,0.000653192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814563,0.00192407,0.001319072,0.003702047,0.008315731,0.003282927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008163551,0.00003278046,0.0001759881,0.002417556,0.00002214989,0.00009913626,0.00005997433,0.00002936149,0.0002023064,0.002557673,0.9697417,0.02457974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009044881,0.00003401863,0.001685695,0.002144406,0.00002238669,0.0001294657,0.0002116793,0.0000873318,0.0003253123,0.005878268,0.9893425,0.00004852238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.001500173,0.001276254,0.0008154672,0.006677091,0.005229458,0.001305511,0.2995766,0.009004175,0.6746154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01099346,0.004450558,0.004354818,0.002287519,0.003836815,0.001615588,0.3225494,0.009752722,0.6401591],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8719699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316113921","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2015.1007814","title":"Declaration of Interdependence: A Legal Pluralistic Approach to Indigenous Rights, by Kirsten Anker","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Legal pluralism; Indigenous rights; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Scott Simon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03215963150003473,"gpt":0.2844659928703187,"spread":0.2523063613702839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01779111,0.0007003827,0.0006620192,0.002184314,0.007895207,0.009595471,0.002423286,0.007523032,0.002412996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01597584,0.0005981649,0.0006450025,0.001875362,0.0259347,0.01615421,0.007833017,0.01390374,0.0005100491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008038243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01391574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02294436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03886521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9858549,0.008747101,0.0007073219,0.000793098,0.003193434,0.0007040108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991569,0.005689845,0.0006358286,0.000341897,0.001227894,0.0005355768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001378381,0.00002263136,0.0001007775,0.0001462295,0.000009233623,0.0001846823,0.01662964,0.0003312794,0.0001279376,0.8631973,0.1021408,0.01709564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001211763,0.00001687486,0.0005840744,0.001277533,0.00001023985,0.0001921965,0.008091881,0.000476496,0.0001870894,0.4056465,0.5834459,0.00005907608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003740638,0.1682067,0.01420606,0.6385137,0.009801025,0.000133226,0.00005984841,0.00005577847,0.1652829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4753147,0.1875011,0.04309548,0.1294677,0.01220649,0.0005241064,0.0001459253,0.0002291886,0.1515154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02294436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09408951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752015618","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2017.1371476","title":"Human rights encounter legal pluralism. Normative and empirical approaches, edited by Giselle Corradi, Eva Brems and Mark Goodale","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Legal research; Legal realism","authors":[{"name":"Melanie G. Wiber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03822617743444392,"gpt":0.3002624874961289,"spread":0.262036310061685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023618,0.001111294,0.0007057516,0.00262172,0.002928157,0.008299974,0.001126629,0.003625955,0.008484882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005589135,0.0006047287,0.0004706629,0.003536229,0.01140053,0.009709141,0.002580294,0.006868262,0.001618644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004409404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003793605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005783423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008666063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985134,0.0007383194,0.00004714444,0.0001604167,0.000451455,0.00008918576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967423,0.002548386,0.0001402322,0.0001137829,0.0003004285,0.000154954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001711577,0.00003507817,0.0002361619,0.0005075273,0.00001476285,0.00008055214,0.004614714,0.0002253575,0.0001341853,0.6590458,0.2968524,0.03823634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102817,0.00001499087,0.001052984,0.001299908,0.000007718752,0.0001627592,0.003893461,0.0001962068,0.0001021115,0.3331479,0.6600894,0.00002222548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00174775,0.6909266,0.002861884,0.1731031,0.01577799,0.00001984217,0.0001319856,0.00005604051,0.1153748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1186099,0.658472,0.005097658,0.03717737,0.04435952,0.0001361867,0.0003011089,0.0002057325,0.1356406],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008484882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03199261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796048373","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2018.1450596","title":"Law and the question of the animal: a critical jurisprudence, edited by Yoriko Otomo and Ed Mussawir","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Scott Simon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01016795029611096,"gpt":0.3170432266291984,"spread":0.3068752763330874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004141716,0.0009377965,0.001117225,0.00234653,0.005671548,0.01057064,0.00202424,0.006437761,0.005343109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006603559,0.0007903579,0.000534159,0.003266393,0.02747305,0.0170816,0.004015952,0.008048347,0.000845838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006650027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01055717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01978031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03170172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972937,0.001567217,0.0001352368,0.0002550985,0.0005836714,0.0001650731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995935,0.002968882,0.0002931456,0.000125006,0.0004511069,0.0002268444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002838046,0.00003702385,0.0002933402,0.0004252149,0.000008902968,0.0001952303,0.01771601,0.0002304152,0.0002627958,0.7612547,0.1950193,0.0245287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001488348,0.00001742443,0.001206567,0.001745931,0.0000113081,0.0001871358,0.01293844,0.0003422185,0.0002247633,0.3943374,0.5889384,0.00003547404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00318639,0.6263659,0.006563935,0.2746703,0.006557269,0.00004753466,0.00008566599,0.00003633985,0.08248658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2365798,0.5710279,0.01429657,0.06154443,0.0180372,0.0002993847,0.0001537372,0.0002370319,0.09782389],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01978031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0482496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}