{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":54,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":54,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"78c6d215392a","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine"}},"results":[{"id":"W2152273753","doi":"10.1080/03605310490500545","title":"Minimal Risk as an International Ethical Standard in Research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration of Helsinki; Harm; Declaration; Commission; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Informed consent; Political science; Research ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine","authors":[{"name":"Loretta M. Kopelman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3681491076343622,"gpt":0.5496925389063827,"spread":0.1815434312720205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.230886,0.001067561,0.003240176,0.004643164,0.004348435,0.01531471,0.00508988,0.01629457,0.001857761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2402974,0.001396729,0.001816009,0.007620027,0.05147713,0.01726178,0.01064703,0.02671474,0.001346561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008145544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03038675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001286116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001696498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6202355,0.2775788,0.0367409,0.007506273,0.05435837,0.003580143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6752883,0.2610668,0.01743004,0.02268879,0.02112454,0.002401407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003082408,0.00002949414,0.0003192986,0.002311061,0.00003126205,0.0001464725,0.003634353,0.0002085008,0.0001942269,0.9176204,0.01295047,0.06252351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000573668,0.0001343864,0.001044033,0.01809606,0.0000806875,0.001297137,0.003141793,0.0004895352,0.0005446819,0.6559873,0.3190453,0.00008162911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003171727,0.4644936,0.16347,0.2052135,0.01761946,0.001324869,0.00009663156,0.0002417452,0.1443686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2128628,0.2269316,0.3478853,0.1690547,0.01688851,0.01121991,0.0002966749,0.0003730368,0.01448756],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.769114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9484545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120330028","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr029","title":"Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Agency (philosophy); Informed consent; Sketch; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Social science; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"N. Stoljar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3040720228245374,"gpt":0.3606201212223293,"spread":0.0565480983977919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02911281,0.0005608366,0.0006066854,0.001853659,0.005070237,0.007989532,0.001588072,0.005629822,0.00349045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02972624,0.0004506018,0.0009684035,0.001425194,0.07839587,0.01493298,0.008571418,0.007872091,0.0005560854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007134289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007212812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002987277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001636686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9610409,0.02774054,0.001367024,0.00271439,0.005308745,0.00182846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765475,0.01708549,0.001983186,0.002039406,0.001511598,0.0008327444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003320286,0.000002445131,0.0000361792,0.00001130863,0.000001672799,0.00002264147,0.002143877,0.00007818315,0.00001930969,0.9963122,0.0001992211,0.001169545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001051689,0.000009594535,0.00006706769,0.00006524639,0.000004044255,0.00008255486,0.0006508182,0.0001921257,0.00006617478,0.9847648,0.01407918,0.000007779999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03743551,0.0188691,0.2513383,0.1401944,0.0008586033,0.0002715644,0.00009675057,0.00009482451,0.550841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9476202,0.004875354,0.02693553,0.00828686,0.0007212713,0.0003551864,0.00004766805,0.00004941656,0.01110856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02911281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1539651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153910246","doi":"10.1080/03605310590960193","title":"From the Local to the Global: Bioethics and the Concept of Culture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Sociology; Ethnic group; Scholarship; Socialization; Health care; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Social science; Political science; Law; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Leigh Turner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1492080553828382,"gpt":0.4694337881044592,"spread":0.320225732721621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02170723,0.000589307,0.001200759,0.002978569,0.008535089,0.02311798,0.001728442,0.007691384,0.003071006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01831442,0.0004713291,0.0005321415,0.0042938,0.09694552,0.03218056,0.01129791,0.01518199,0.0005452296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00781109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0121416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004854321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005497238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9715791,0.02405076,0.0006442315,0.0009594467,0.002016991,0.0007495364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717805,0.0210041,0.001371679,0.002285414,0.001488295,0.002069906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001735582,0.00002843298,0.001182355,0.0002891335,0.00002214476,0.0001650038,0.05067199,0.0002776232,0.0001782232,0.8970779,0.01169508,0.03839482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009172375,0.00003097948,0.0008829278,0.001518581,0.00001395759,0.0002021207,0.03860923,0.0002227194,0.0001108561,0.863388,0.09497758,0.00003379928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02174218,0.1385076,0.02479051,0.7087408,0.00270132,0.00004592517,0.00005913624,0.00008052542,0.1033319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8012675,0.06496274,0.01782506,0.1036615,0.003909499,0.0002370649,0.00006412309,0.0001519555,0.007920543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02311798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1148002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1757378269","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhv063","title":"Beyond (Models of) Disability?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Oppression; Medical model of disability; Value (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Ontology; Disability studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Gender studies; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1243529322203259,"gpt":0.3817393267353224,"spread":0.2573863945149965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009488191,0.0009526032,0.0009170067,0.002449119,0.00407253,0.01159504,0.002651649,0.005831595,0.006243303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009359268,0.0003291298,0.0009226781,0.001468841,0.04530922,0.02209239,0.008839234,0.009648016,0.001187373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00809898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00782223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007472623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005118785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930386,0.004536848,0.0001982955,0.0005077551,0.0009655482,0.0007530408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939644,0.002942881,0.0004825548,0.001050784,0.0007054781,0.0008539245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001546629,0.000003924099,0.00002740672,0.00001107853,8.806388e-7,0.00001199109,0.0008543124,0.0000693805,0.000005944032,0.9970177,0.0008251126,0.001170708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003064921,0.000003635167,0.00003315656,0.00006338468,0.00000161686,0.00003663956,0.00115629,0.0002417385,0.00001623439,0.9717591,0.02668099,0.000004181826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01303311,0.0101629,0.1012838,0.3350575,0.00207606,0.00008725215,0.0001584311,0.0001185956,0.5380225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.906294,0.008692384,0.02235781,0.02360947,0.001883881,0.0004346934,0.0001722657,0.0001067208,0.03644894],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01159504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05876243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029475285","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr024","title":"Multicultural Medicine and the Politics of Recognition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Cultural Competency in Health Care","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Personhood; Vision; Negotiation; Politics; Cultural diversity; Value (mathematics); Ethnic group; Diversity (politics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Social science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Laurence J. Kirmayer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.237167662634781,"gpt":0.3899814229674855,"spread":0.1528137603327046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03118385,0.0003694799,0.0006591499,0.001626235,0.02644699,0.01701522,0.001682636,0.008811451,0.004241728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02171013,0.00051117,0.0005405307,0.001126337,0.1065785,0.01070228,0.02084042,0.01379475,0.0004452908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01315263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01797874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01139278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01207009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9679832,0.02239479,0.0007765099,0.00220532,0.002911986,0.00372836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832545,0.008597245,0.001594813,0.001326801,0.001454002,0.003772617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001082041,0.00002759101,0.0006975402,0.00003736244,0.000007035912,0.0001856229,0.05613727,0.000054678,0.00008449068,0.9241433,0.007159738,0.01145457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003954781,0.00006619324,0.001382465,0.0004579439,0.00001416128,0.0006539381,0.07356379,0.0003136708,0.0002283744,0.6694491,0.2537836,0.00004728822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07388338,0.02129366,0.005996712,0.485335,0.003115887,0.00006196633,0.00001292482,0.0000359404,0.4102645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9480146,0.00245251,0.001396202,0.03581893,0.001100238,0.000045249,0.000006684248,0.00002682004,0.01113861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03118385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1649179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993666335","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr026","title":"How Should Political Philosophers Think of Health?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Politics; Metaphysics; Political philosophy; Health care; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Equity (law); Public health; Perspective (graphical); Health policy; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Medicine; Law; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3967469227560448,"gpt":0.4834581242385131,"spread":0.08671120148246825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01604697,0.0009322899,0.00140591,0.002667991,0.005468321,0.01303291,0.00214669,0.0134408,0.006113091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02160902,0.0006512685,0.0008186412,0.002011429,0.04222359,0.01630907,0.003539198,0.0267544,0.001816839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006239482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005034083,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002531201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921955,0.005045963,0.0002176765,0.000531288,0.001326037,0.0006835699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830453,0.01278481,0.0008073752,0.0006770138,0.001339173,0.0013462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000869426,0.00002027624,0.0001295653,0.00006665246,0.00000935153,0.00003151317,0.001779566,0.0001963188,0.00002417923,0.9745477,0.01919553,0.00399058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001284304,0.000005026759,0.00008332443,0.0001031102,0.000003131594,0.00002110222,0.0009588926,0.0001340679,0.00001469944,0.9557404,0.04291726,0.00000618421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001073064,0.01275689,0.004989606,0.956086,0.002409626,0.0000119757,0.00003694676,0.00001954365,0.02261639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3615557,0.04910685,0.01449666,0.5229426,0.03137948,0.00030515,0.0001447294,0.0001464142,0.01992231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01604697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08486551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146685042","doi":"10.1080/03605310500499203","title":"The Ethics and Science of Placebo-Controlled Trials: Assay Sensitivity and the Duhem–Quine Thesis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Appeal; Placebo; Clinical trial; Assay sensitivity; Aside; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Alternative medicine; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Internal medicine","authors":[{"name":"James Anderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3941801818369858,"gpt":0.5096282646228812,"spread":0.1154480827858955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3731989,0.001612649,0.005954215,0.00502471,0.003842246,0.01309412,0.004178885,0.01757108,0.002189385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.453305,0.001664004,0.002780928,0.002654901,0.08869892,0.01601803,0.00843346,0.02494908,0.0007844847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007170314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008296862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001467484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006515215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5749667,0.3571607,0.0116077,0.01712832,0.03655988,0.002576593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2479278,0.6966096,0.01504076,0.02862701,0.01010884,0.001685885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001507475,0.00002713943,0.0005066858,0.0004681486,0.0001889002,0.0001083292,0.0009482763,0.0005864076,0.00009503182,0.984373,0.003733928,0.008813423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001760541,0.00007948621,0.0002548648,0.0003926554,0.00004555604,0.0001156544,0.00006939665,0.00122593,0.0001715717,0.9832854,0.01414869,0.00003470632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008150959,0.07956189,0.3232245,0.5240294,0.006931689,0.0006989077,0.0003147029,0.0001340193,0.05695387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4510668,0.02465204,0.2117671,0.2750927,0.02643424,0.00503522,0.0001497166,0.000240224,0.005561942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6268011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7729573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605486355","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhx006","title":"Truth or Spin? Disease Definition in Cancer Screening","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Epistemology; Disease; Objectivity (philosophy); Appeal; Philosophy of medicine; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Philosophy of science; Scope (computer science); Medicine; Philosophy; Pathology; Alternative medicine; Political science; Biology; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Lynette Reid","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3123465130889914,"gpt":0.4101933882912694,"spread":0.09784687520227808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0295457,0.0004965826,0.001517536,0.002967845,0.005054705,0.007942719,0.002003732,0.007309197,0.001903292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04286655,0.0005530848,0.001008787,0.001526176,0.07046921,0.01990767,0.005259597,0.01252222,0.0002958245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004614609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005172479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002548768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9826266,0.01152998,0.001007697,0.001747367,0.002385677,0.0007026336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710881,0.02288322,0.001393181,0.001453465,0.002113037,0.001069098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000189014,0.000008250184,0.0004288857,0.00006075846,0.000008275259,0.00005310233,0.002921432,0.00008368673,0.00005667347,0.9896868,0.002358272,0.004314989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001294376,0.000009194513,0.0002131434,0.00009855063,0.00001098855,0.0001034215,0.0008992189,0.0001958396,0.00005180106,0.989075,0.009319702,0.00001029966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02476169,0.0463552,0.04305521,0.8134738,0.003927052,0.00006308293,0.0001988738,0.00005815275,0.06810689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8957357,0.01126633,0.01684178,0.06766579,0.004715179,0.0001471347,0.0001511593,0.00006331993,0.003413564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1562545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093020889","doi":"10.1080/03605310701255735","title":"Equipoise and the Duty of Care in Clinical Research: A Philosophical Response to Our Critics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Constructive; Presupposition; Clinical equipoise; Duty; Epistemology; Sociology; Dimension (graph theory); Field (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine; Clinical trial; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Paul B. Miller","is_ca":true},{"name":"Charles Weijer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5969553625238638,"gpt":0.6108084616549729,"spread":0.0138530991311091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2270187,0.0009626375,0.002706536,0.003560018,0.01600315,0.0212929,0.005313163,0.04496475,0.001619953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2272005,0.001366343,0.001727113,0.003241319,0.239044,0.03067032,0.01664708,0.08460211,0.0005935738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01300086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01853801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002951076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002539254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7431211,0.2100711,0.00806581,0.007632857,0.02715527,0.003953786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5707254,0.3762591,0.01014389,0.01148097,0.02216742,0.009223185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003359739,0.00002860181,0.0001966963,0.0001433579,0.0000141801,0.0001132897,0.01514713,0.0001325902,0.00007532728,0.9534829,0.02575911,0.00487311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009149664,0.000052867,0.0002822618,0.0008618593,0.0000203179,0.000313164,0.008600444,0.0004792856,0.0001440687,0.8513117,0.1377774,0.00006499968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001092519,0.004600626,0.002677211,0.9848989,0.001808377,0.00001106289,0.000002469345,0.000009792422,0.004899084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.233445,0.007673318,0.007103556,0.7318934,0.01635938,0.0003378748,0.0000100056,0.0001052982,0.003072225],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7729813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014395762","doi":"10.1080/03605310490882975","title":"The Difference that Difference Makes: Bioethics and the Challenge of ?Disability?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Medical model of disability; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Tom Koch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.244372253378034,"gpt":0.4592056169332008,"spread":0.2148333635551668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02116716,0.0004515449,0.0008384627,0.002064868,0.01114162,0.0173854,0.001545348,0.0139766,0.002917683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03388961,0.0002913945,0.0004950574,0.001517916,0.08984134,0.02276442,0.01036208,0.016319,0.0006890844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009114955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01163082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004601486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9753723,0.01945188,0.0005350517,0.0008296729,0.002533455,0.001277637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748794,0.02050698,0.0009131273,0.001052722,0.001279432,0.001368407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116004,0.00001310084,0.0001206064,0.0000593226,0.000003018903,0.00007171693,0.007730091,0.00004238455,0.0000435293,0.9723885,0.008441757,0.01107441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001545061,0.00001830385,0.0002261784,0.0006390499,0.000005279427,0.0001799389,0.01394891,0.0001097456,0.00007417691,0.8552723,0.1294925,0.00001808367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00607631,0.02721285,0.003940266,0.9075487,0.002637819,0.00001203535,0.00001131732,0.00001292182,0.05254781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7851318,0.0242336,0.004744992,0.1645675,0.007109991,0.0001278274,0.00002470098,0.00007146483,0.01398821],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02116716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132418305","doi":"10.1080/03605310591008603","title":"ICU Psychosis and Patient Autonomy: Some Thoughts from the Inside","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Connaught Fund; University of Alberta","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychosis; Personal autonomy; Psychology; Patient rights; Psychoanalysis; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Political science; Law; Health care","authors":[{"name":"Cheryl Misak","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1251813880495539,"gpt":0.3782367023058621,"spread":0.2530553142563081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005856339,0.000621092,0.001668329,0.001438805,0.002683814,0.00459695,0.001591849,0.007360511,0.002038321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008422123,0.0003329253,0.0008241797,0.002422937,0.01144814,0.01211695,0.003928979,0.01053061,0.0004825863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002040686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003133048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002443522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003046873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973769,0.001779087,0.000166933,0.0001924769,0.0003599564,0.0001246604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928406,0.005856692,0.0004009769,0.0001153419,0.0004943373,0.0002919624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002674088,0.0001563736,0.002474695,0.01571274,0.0001812985,0.007646952,0.0766333,0.0006319315,0.0008783623,0.2471772,0.1844852,0.4637546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005784783,0.0002097554,0.002189166,0.01956282,0.00006188271,0.01062871,0.05143386,0.0002427429,0.0002598654,0.1255634,0.7896599,0.0001301424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000685497,0.8813128,0.0002356199,0.113716,0.002510158,0.000003667058,0.000004356459,0.000003768339,0.001528082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03571281,0.8745185,0.0005618708,0.07868551,0.009347885,0.00005040659,0.0000103021,0.000008715663,0.001104037],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007360511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03097165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994632969","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr012","title":"Parental Wisdom, Empirical Blindness, and Normative Evaluation of Prenatal Genetic Enhancement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Virtue; Psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Tonkens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3494471633912644,"gpt":0.4154664060065492,"spread":0.0660192426152848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04440775,0.0003713164,0.0006809027,0.002207137,0.003048462,0.005527742,0.00165842,0.004593717,0.001552224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1340522,0.0002909747,0.0003213832,0.0008034211,0.06445998,0.008668271,0.006894517,0.005904614,0.0001122336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003985152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004439075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001394936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001269327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9648438,0.02127306,0.001346729,0.002302852,0.009136048,0.001097536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9029233,0.0688951,0.007343613,0.009861086,0.009398447,0.001578436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002334347,0.00001847019,0.001336003,0.00004074541,0.000008326388,0.0001014619,0.004687725,0.0001944801,0.0001851024,0.9848217,0.0005911432,0.007991598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001118539,0.00001714923,0.001020575,0.0000840471,0.000007990449,0.0001430007,0.002103616,0.0004059977,0.0003646879,0.9913073,0.00452024,0.00001420366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.26809,0.009438796,0.0816149,0.1823153,0.001367692,0.0001304963,0.00008990709,0.0001373084,0.4568157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888342,0.0005814384,0.005682091,0.003522593,0.0001411773,0.00006037178,0.00001146964,0.00001899367,0.001147721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04440775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2348534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122034985","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.3.339.2978","title":"Extending the Human Life Span","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Life expectancy; Life span; Demise; Natural selection; Longevity; Harm; Senescence; Biology; Human life; Disease; Environmental ethics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Evolutionary biology; Psychology; Sociology; Genetics; Medicine; Demography; Political science; Computer science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Walter Glannon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09592613166548251,"gpt":0.3223932760730495,"spread":0.2264671444075669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001804385,0.000289752,0.0003458295,0.0005101113,0.001311758,0.002055502,0.0003665878,0.001655222,0.006391215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002112139,0.0000965549,0.0003051481,0.0002136153,0.005679072,0.003178969,0.002853794,0.001514195,0.001513864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001050514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001604989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007145478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007362675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994723,0.0002289604,0.00002012982,0.0001086911,0.000106095,0.00006388403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991323,0.0002125226,0.00008392876,0.0001455032,0.0001444996,0.0002811646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005998777,0.00006539933,0.001578393,0.0002545325,0.00002404788,0.0001711652,0.002803916,0.0006102354,0.004142914,0.8528903,0.01980468,0.1175946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001502511,0.0001537899,0.00208076,0.0002896779,0.00002141156,0.0004985451,0.0007079966,0.0001788562,0.000753274,0.4137926,0.5814906,0.0000175085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0765508,0.1649085,0.04382731,0.1774387,0.004409786,0.00008881479,0.0002969499,0.0003315731,0.5321476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294783,0.07658462,0.01824351,0.03016439,0.002772723,0.0001740062,0.0001235708,0.00007651953,0.04238247],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006391215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02138078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127835924","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.1.35.3035","title":"On Risk and Decisional Capacity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Competence (human resources); Appeal; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Mental capacity; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"David Checkland","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.167895181112407,"gpt":0.4146168259716663,"spread":0.2467216448592592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01269777,0.0005726088,0.0006427707,0.001771908,0.004520097,0.01029598,0.001722196,0.005397958,0.006113433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03192132,0.0003618285,0.0008042633,0.001150645,0.06386856,0.0122453,0.009036935,0.007560898,0.0007544153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006531192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005108114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00346612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001716265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985565,0.00716334,0.0005460923,0.001367139,0.003549783,0.001808627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747148,0.01859653,0.00157657,0.002043251,0.001916995,0.001151969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003829547,0.000003879736,0.00006927794,0.000007156187,0.000001785142,0.00001646786,0.0003317612,0.0001965633,0.00001336667,0.9980812,0.0003927583,0.0008819436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005088176,0.000003886209,0.00007732397,0.00003256881,0.000001442166,0.00001603198,0.0001560565,0.0001919094,0.00002321919,0.9952753,0.004212886,0.000004321666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04246183,0.01071769,0.03926907,0.1323879,0.0006562207,0.00006673035,0.000131728,0.00005173486,0.7742571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765768,0.003023649,0.003259127,0.007118392,0.0006971087,0.0001141587,0.00002805409,0.00003847819,0.009144355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01269777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06715304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146787238","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhv013","title":"A Family-Oriented Decision-Making Model for Human Research in Mainland China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Peking University; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Mainland China; Harmony (color); China; Informed consent; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6488557554326542,"gpt":0.5878811024293545,"spread":0.06097465300329963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01228896,0.0005858199,0.0004777459,0.00115281,0.003101558,0.003600194,0.001884328,0.002355436,0.004457651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007254881,0.0002341311,0.0007918038,0.001055797,0.01288295,0.003766233,0.00253275,0.001778089,0.0003728131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01032499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01424947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01520653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01016852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931703,0.004662636,0.0002174092,0.0006493116,0.0007672037,0.0005332152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960687,0.00226621,0.0004399818,0.0003901525,0.0004249679,0.0004099378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002769503,0.00002828434,0.001305802,0.00003591113,0.00001543408,0.0002895632,0.002807431,0.006287391,0.00008734011,0.9835727,0.0006541719,0.004888269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009634365,0.0001006599,0.001614184,0.00008934105,0.00003486628,0.0002657332,0.001570243,0.03211311,0.0001909472,0.9463694,0.01752292,0.00003230396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2501041,0.003605566,0.2975524,0.05401496,0.0003360784,0.001545661,0.0003747317,0.00009610951,0.3923703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583689,0.0009119001,0.02696689,0.0008765953,0.0000567433,0.0004569883,0.00004677001,0.00000880414,0.01230633],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01520653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07491344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070516711","doi":"10.1080/03605310600712851","title":"Bioethics as Ideology: Conditional and Unconditional Values","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Bioethics; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Tom Koch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3105860782129283,"gpt":0.5363035263583699,"spread":0.2257174481454415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01088802,0.0004427911,0.001081388,0.002577744,0.002550043,0.01221921,0.001196569,0.004869152,0.003716904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0181972,0.0004365487,0.0003755211,0.004554831,0.04005988,0.01811449,0.005875281,0.008330908,0.001096651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00905752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001756893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001931246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9843225,0.0106526,0.0004670406,0.0006709097,0.003467252,0.0004196838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984703,0.01203858,0.0009717571,0.0007497239,0.001145043,0.0003918579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008821974,0.000008036254,0.0001023939,0.0005026322,0.000008729737,0.00003443838,0.002508305,0.00005079723,0.00005494774,0.9622134,0.005231443,0.02927615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001049877,0.00001680309,0.0004485729,0.002702439,0.00001106542,0.0001690713,0.002756968,0.0001149491,0.00006468863,0.7856447,0.2080476,0.0000127405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003276058,0.7097952,0.01349985,0.1483797,0.003033254,0.00002962994,0.0000285543,0.00002879272,0.1219289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4237486,0.4890752,0.01161301,0.04388941,0.009616873,0.0003443225,0.0000659828,0.00007347476,0.02157307],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01221921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05758208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157483961","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab004","title":"A Genealogy of Autonomy: Freedom, Paternalism, and the Future of the Doctor–Patient Relationship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Paternalism; Teleology; Bioethics; Obligation; Epistemology; Philosophical methodology; Beneficence; Sociology; Philosophy of medicine; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Quentin I. T. Genuis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1370333197505721,"gpt":0.4271301359723292,"spread":0.2900968162217571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01280926,0.0001941087,0.0003385136,0.0008570983,0.006880138,0.009253738,0.0008667541,0.004339078,0.001819632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01402472,0.0003095271,0.0002796446,0.0005563304,0.07977207,0.01051536,0.006366339,0.008748353,0.0003065741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004531474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006074355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002441832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002145654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870078,0.01042796,0.0002054062,0.000538472,0.001217741,0.0006025036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875516,0.00940973,0.0007629492,0.0006305617,0.000503779,0.001141359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001147667,0.000008843747,0.0002259632,0.00001261014,0.000002021993,0.00007263074,0.009782501,0.00007728163,0.00004273375,0.9853123,0.001088962,0.003362786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013871,0.00001573019,0.0002640397,0.00008926852,0.00000261175,0.0002230023,0.004216863,0.0002475927,0.0000668489,0.9621241,0.03272481,0.0000113666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07113504,0.02101629,0.0441151,0.5974831,0.001438042,0.00003662043,0.00003142059,0.00003961282,0.2647048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737303,0.003737154,0.0037752,0.01246247,0.0005553136,0.00003502765,0.000007475269,0.00002403687,0.00567301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01280926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06774265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2832492673","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhy009","title":"An Epistemic Argument for Research-Practice Integration in Medicine","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fondation Brocher","keywords":"Elitism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Order (exchange); Sociology; Transformation (genetics); Health care; Politics; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robyn Bluhm","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kirstin Borgerson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6201752658057844,"gpt":0.6017771940372039,"spread":0.01839807176858055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1184878,0.0009057347,0.001715465,0.00358316,0.01589351,0.02138621,0.003092187,0.03300443,0.008456479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.190593,0.001232533,0.00286393,0.002402028,0.09291544,0.03601561,0.02452376,0.02581996,0.002106559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009791872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01446236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001769601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009954756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8705367,0.09005237,0.005330138,0.009076795,0.02049838,0.004505693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8007586,0.1548759,0.008420697,0.01692049,0.0124476,0.006576688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002405126,0.00002008745,0.00009339774,0.00004491661,0.000009167039,0.00005274804,0.001007941,0.000086789,0.00002994758,0.9953049,0.002060602,0.001265424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001236763,0.00002463891,0.0001374027,0.0002195582,0.00002372081,0.00009453885,0.000489218,0.0004353197,0.0001391117,0.9651718,0.0331145,0.00002650183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01018556,0.004062388,0.06401052,0.6675739,0.003423795,0.0002284364,0.0000844704,0.0001240078,0.2503068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.771502,0.001612728,0.0421262,0.1602933,0.006049712,0.001202472,0.00006935975,0.0001281012,0.01701619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6266307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115124278","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.4.343.3011","title":"Feminist Ethics and the Metaphor of AIDS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Bioethics; Dominance (genetics); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Susan Sherwin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1141297465101227,"gpt":0.3768398497822524,"spread":0.2627101032721297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003949631,0.0005904608,0.0003354186,0.001364096,0.006228684,0.004655408,0.0007015367,0.004031961,0.004781204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004730661,0.0002188255,0.000286342,0.0008634597,0.03994495,0.004807512,0.003775284,0.00361827,0.0006656915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004535417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002517692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002180651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002056471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933756,0.005541612,0.00006942474,0.0001808805,0.0004838516,0.0003486741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969606,0.002331082,0.0002551542,0.0001081947,0.0001723576,0.0001726626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004083896,0.000002641911,0.00004275727,0.00002498881,8.875234e-7,0.00008457716,0.008103597,0.0000472155,0.00004699189,0.9874825,0.002302012,0.001857731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001249939,0.00001439972,0.0001753713,0.0003263889,0.000002727976,0.0005390191,0.013019,0.0001617585,0.0001368597,0.6431805,0.3424226,0.000008750144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02331877,0.04797499,0.01454326,0.2099474,0.001300514,0.00003072459,0.00006019795,0.00004074899,0.7027834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9154137,0.01484185,0.004982417,0.0225615,0.001012567,0.0001103416,0.00002529249,0.00006358803,0.04098877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006228684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03290695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367856496","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhad019","title":"Evidence-based Medicine and Mechanistic Evidence: The Case of the Failed Rollout of Efavirenz in Zimbabwe","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Evidence-based medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Psychological intervention; Efavirenz; Positive economics; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Antiretroviral therapy; Law; Economics; Psychiatry; Family medicine; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Park","is_ca":true},{"name":"Daniel Steel","is_ca":true},{"name":"Elicia Maine","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7936951828489627,"gpt":0.5305091262581133,"spread":0.2631860565908494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1326996,0.0008112384,0.002477878,0.003254557,0.005720404,0.008306609,0.003418801,0.01582941,0.001742308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2434766,0.00102753,0.002111334,0.00438812,0.02166878,0.01040955,0.005589355,0.01464417,0.0001184812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01954469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0159796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05367307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0603985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.896067,0.08803998,0.003977899,0.002671713,0.005597623,0.003645841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.637452,0.3385269,0.01140479,0.005758667,0.005236288,0.001621498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001482548,0.0001286851,0.01409915,0.007403029,0.002688566,0.01634428,0.02302769,0.01233057,0.001128958,0.7734016,0.02719888,0.120766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000891311,0.0004003022,0.01091693,0.02506815,0.002847689,0.004157814,0.0150062,0.01333034,0.001607344,0.769314,0.1561121,0.0003478391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04473576,0.121502,0.01049109,0.808612,0.0009733255,0.0002095728,0.000202584,0.00002674001,0.01324697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8111483,0.06154555,0.02349956,0.1007842,0.001239689,0.0003476299,0.00009025276,0.00004384241,0.001301075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7017908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082973924","doi":"10.1076/jmep.28.4.427.15966","title":"Subjectivity and Values in Medicine: The Case of Canguilhem","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophical methodology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Peter Trnka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.128814650244488,"gpt":0.3581878619908527,"spread":0.2293732117463647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01028652,0.0004405712,0.000659824,0.001691689,0.01217359,0.00940153,0.001024403,0.007961035,0.001802653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009248091,0.0003649707,0.0004090795,0.001632005,0.093799,0.007994197,0.007799296,0.009347537,0.0002940407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007836512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005658505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009272927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01143229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895097,0.008299213,0.000125888,0.0004799752,0.000829184,0.0007561321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947299,0.004145954,0.0001997719,0.0003501342,0.000251524,0.0003227156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009703206,0.000005300338,0.00006957073,0.00001236726,0.000002359987,0.0001135268,0.01212814,0.00004686241,0.00001593762,0.9833193,0.002449599,0.001827333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001555691,0.00001051812,0.0001103716,0.0001160289,0.0000051763,0.000160989,0.004460923,0.0001604037,0.00006904986,0.9095203,0.08535955,0.00001114662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04013367,0.04795119,0.00933845,0.2568754,0.001838889,0.00005765679,0.00002982803,0.00004539252,0.6437297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505296,0.006031722,0.002868733,0.02401094,0.0009260983,0.0001036279,0.000009882965,0.00005412664,0.01546539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05685812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102334346","doi":"10.1076/0360-5310(200010)25:5;1-w;ft569","title":"The Ends of Medical Intervention and the Demarcation of the Normal from the Pathological","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Intervention (counseling); Context (archaeology); Normality; Fallacy; Naturalism; Epistemology; State (computer science); Mainstream; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Computer science; History; Nursing","authors":[{"name":"Abraham Rudnick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08657771627797028,"gpt":0.337217490752925,"spread":0.2506397744749547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01402217,0.000398041,0.0006211178,0.002121718,0.005656383,0.00967117,0.001112738,0.005109915,0.001505053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02185366,0.0003119587,0.0003929467,0.0006748777,0.125088,0.01098696,0.008213588,0.008808285,0.0003329053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005525276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00743457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001059382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000948525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9706552,0.02023109,0.0008161681,0.001761935,0.004931441,0.001604153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829244,0.01101005,0.001837463,0.001779903,0.001298224,0.001149939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001090592,0.000007740157,0.0001001944,0.00001444142,0.000001076367,0.00003049729,0.003048067,0.00004811644,0.00005403916,0.9932218,0.0005001708,0.002962994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008027931,0.00001563495,0.000236214,0.00009600525,0.000002158609,0.00009408793,0.002413713,0.0001151529,0.0001706687,0.9700549,0.02678471,0.000008689326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07480624,0.01814098,0.07005717,0.2373447,0.002103658,0.0001369287,0.00005369598,0.0001485001,0.5972082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703544,0.002857201,0.009726121,0.00837735,0.0006104323,0.0001602464,0.00002345905,0.00005567075,0.007835176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01402217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07415724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105789017","doi":"10.1080/03605310490503579","title":"Collective Moral Imagination: Making Decisions for Persons With Dementia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Dementia; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Elisabeth Gedge","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2254834632578255,"gpt":0.4765568570658505,"spread":0.2510733938080251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01547137,0.00101397,0.0006271259,0.001128572,0.01163251,0.01280477,0.002087776,0.007747167,0.003751259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03741465,0.0003766806,0.001048043,0.0005423715,0.03302306,0.009670591,0.01282405,0.01114687,0.001166697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004462072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006254484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002044697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003636443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9771088,0.01992065,0.0003368915,0.0005437013,0.001071644,0.001018416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878134,0.006107072,0.001855625,0.0005276474,0.0009301087,0.002766173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001567544,0.0002693523,0.005234008,0.0002979887,0.00006892379,0.002854147,0.8199068,0.0005455408,0.0004473958,0.0799405,0.02456704,0.0657115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005866593,0.0001803562,0.001983745,0.0006282916,0.00004852387,0.002487716,0.7154731,0.000799166,0.0004072719,0.1660821,0.1117872,0.00006385092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3795105,0.01990205,0.01670935,0.381911,0.003060324,0.0002012008,0.00006192462,0.0001289875,0.1985147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767039,0.003377349,0.00481018,0.008482508,0.0003544135,0.00009042289,0.00003506118,0.00002060339,0.006125556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01547137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08182138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152662042","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhs057","title":"Human All Too Human Reasoning: Comparing Clinical and Phenomenological Intuition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"European Science Foundation","keywords":"Intuition; Bioethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Hillel D. Braude","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4085742563848706,"gpt":0.5316484665720749,"spread":0.1230742101872043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01512255,0.0004006017,0.0006132526,0.004212981,0.001829992,0.00726041,0.001325746,0.002423158,0.003328568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05568261,0.0003440026,0.000646134,0.00185788,0.02804757,0.01348539,0.005462613,0.002860667,0.000301432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003777109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002598914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001294608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000927849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9839057,0.01261889,0.0005661343,0.0006088197,0.001774053,0.0005264275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557642,0.03830046,0.001879783,0.001933157,0.001505162,0.0006170677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001527865,0.00007187334,0.003037967,0.0004901974,0.00004609462,0.0003236746,0.1192605,0.001305996,0.0003424255,0.8528142,0.001884149,0.02027013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004204872,0.0000716268,0.002740112,0.0004421682,0.0000231173,0.0006161754,0.04687705,0.001887983,0.0002550049,0.9235897,0.02339604,0.00005887568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3280716,0.02653234,0.2262637,0.05817601,0.001130204,0.0004526129,0.0003917431,0.0003410755,0.3586408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798667,0.002801867,0.01326105,0.002438387,0.0001328492,0.000147278,0.00008720584,0.00004082908,0.001223817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01512255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07997662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148510017","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhu020","title":"Why the Debate over Minimal Risk Needs to be Reconsidered","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Referent; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Relative risk; Philosophy; Mathematics; Confidence interval; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Ariella Binik","is_ca":false},{"name":"Charles Weijer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3607169637700872,"gpt":0.4750319989977756,"spread":0.1143150352276884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2122783,0.001231772,0.003798378,0.003167045,0.01052633,0.02004558,0.01170772,0.044064,0.005280838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2839009,0.001080942,0.002729908,0.003041846,0.1186432,0.06189171,0.01342664,0.06646204,0.002059544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0164568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01916604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007965935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004878588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8115408,0.1363366,0.00818004,0.01210512,0.02587434,0.00596311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6145626,0.3252212,0.01025506,0.01120233,0.03008179,0.008677116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007811001,0.00003045634,0.000229043,0.0003125432,0.00003375952,0.0001337073,0.009548241,0.0001272593,0.0001165274,0.9338272,0.04664764,0.008915485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006641776,0.00002471569,0.0001983254,0.000969141,0.00001930507,0.0001285535,0.006667822,0.0002706333,0.0001132825,0.9245118,0.06697392,0.00005606228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001109297,0.006883658,0.003150366,0.9815709,0.002724516,0.00001389301,0.00001688655,0.0000170627,0.004513424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1759242,0.009838584,0.01038245,0.7781247,0.02142318,0.0002834332,0.00006052936,0.0002334522,0.00372939],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2122783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967037242","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.4.417.3009","title":"Shifting the Autonomy Debate to Theory as Ideology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Autonomy; Ideology; Criticism; Feminism; Sociology; Epistemology; Nothing; Ideal (ethics); Critical theory; Law; Philosophy; Gender studies; Politics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Carolyn Ells","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1198574349454127,"gpt":0.3925853119336358,"spread":0.2727278769882232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01300767,0.0007390062,0.000774393,0.003603237,0.007986253,0.01338377,0.002109037,0.007641092,0.004547482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112708,0.0004115273,0.0008914452,0.002010895,0.08373064,0.01943237,0.008784086,0.01321613,0.0008688564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01468085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006147676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00616408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002604472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9844653,0.01024346,0.0002327081,0.001322936,0.002462496,0.001273125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887038,0.00860742,0.0005767538,0.0007177663,0.0007152883,0.0006789796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002033731,0.000003709315,0.0000286657,0.000008887897,6.298259e-7,0.00001444053,0.002998667,0.00004570804,0.00001590982,0.9952906,0.0007837978,0.000806861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007687898,0.000007228106,0.00006697147,0.00008574945,0.000001634968,0.00002037905,0.002357413,0.0002019261,0.00005027694,0.9490215,0.04817414,0.000005098418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03057958,0.02896866,0.03041676,0.3702438,0.003338385,0.00002923511,0.0000696283,0.00006812579,0.5362858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390778,0.008559782,0.004650272,0.01821378,0.004966768,0.0001116391,0.00005527232,0.0001624054,0.0242023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01468085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1065175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998798653","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhz029","title":"Ethical Issues in Physician Billing Under Fee-For-Service Plans","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Taboo; Solidarity; Order (exchange); Dimension (graph theory); Public relations; Service (business); Medical ethics; Professional responsibility; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Business; Law; Political science; Politics; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Heath","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1851712729543774,"gpt":0.4628295232928429,"spread":0.2776582503384655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08131531,0.0003602411,0.0005378592,0.00128234,0.0128383,0.01281782,0.001896113,0.02195047,0.001242524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1256548,0.0006784895,0.0009183576,0.001204753,0.04075575,0.007384865,0.005176959,0.01630815,0.0003378411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007907157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01458119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004811974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005240418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8957545,0.0780879,0.004118649,0.002284543,0.01564319,0.00411119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8786361,0.1062671,0.005414108,0.002137224,0.00464155,0.002903987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002718549,0.00004529726,0.001643747,0.00006362153,0.00001593139,0.0009202881,0.01725151,0.0007447518,0.0001700619,0.9522013,0.01186971,0.0150466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003520382,0.00005923178,0.002364167,0.0006254661,0.00002131537,0.001537073,0.0157727,0.002123032,0.0003305842,0.8896936,0.08737279,0.00006482856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.04123144,0.008945184,0.01380631,0.846392,0.001497537,0.00007612519,0.00001799132,0.00002759049,0.08800592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8646752,0.004154996,0.01329576,0.1070714,0.003310274,0.0001790594,0.00001272639,0.00005726538,0.007243343],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08131531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4300416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946744580","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab041","title":"Reconciling Regulation with Scientific Autonomy in Dual-Use Research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Normative; Dual (grammatical number); Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Censorship; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Risk analysis (engineering); Positive economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Business; Economics; Medicine; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas G. Evans","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael J. Selgelid","is_ca":true},{"name":"Robert Mark Simpson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6377498291168069,"gpt":0.5415566889946979,"spread":0.096193140122109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2414884,0.0009491466,0.002152081,0.002895595,0.007995574,0.01728335,0.005793327,0.02264712,0.003332045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2560991,0.00157482,0.002098174,0.00159094,0.09985725,0.0237221,0.02344174,0.02306901,0.0009708839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008084039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01765329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001781674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001234674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7500809,0.1738625,0.01014125,0.01734099,0.04299726,0.005576983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6200209,0.2896002,0.01936696,0.04704274,0.01803107,0.005938156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001905057,0.00001651823,0.0002368865,0.00004458872,0.00001417418,0.0000529972,0.002796725,0.0003912691,0.0001988395,0.9923331,0.0005548947,0.003340997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003425883,0.00002337486,0.0000926522,0.0001185328,0.00001320325,0.00005437462,0.000308206,0.0006753695,0.0003291124,0.9892517,0.009078349,0.000020863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04572922,0.004749044,0.4790329,0.2972705,0.001755699,0.0004228335,0.0000885051,0.0003085354,0.1706428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8872299,0.0009678726,0.06143764,0.04185227,0.001303414,0.001455491,0.0000400531,0.0001415306,0.005571707],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9353799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033923131","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhp054","title":"Clinical Research in Context: Reexamining the Distinction between Research and Practice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Clinical Practice; Engineering ethics; Bioethics; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"J. A. Anderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6997599043628012,"gpt":0.6058049002541721,"spread":0.09395500410862911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07224812,0.001285056,0.002281439,0.007368587,0.01335046,0.03326569,0.004254967,0.01504103,0.001959524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07815045,0.00127627,0.0009082271,0.005386457,0.1544808,0.04092106,0.02098397,0.02500008,0.0004904362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01411052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0244236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005702483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008570031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8616517,0.1206346,0.00293163,0.00425441,0.007990313,0.002537279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.895235,0.08743609,0.004797272,0.004478025,0.005009213,0.00304433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021452,0.00001170263,0.0002987605,0.0002252867,0.000007806856,0.0001042353,0.02330365,0.00008218132,0.00008146894,0.9697273,0.0008384657,0.005297657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005634236,0.000070038,0.0009503059,0.001857168,0.00003194324,0.0003287414,0.02481225,0.0003277404,0.0002006991,0.8838508,0.0874803,0.00003370869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02732122,0.1333094,0.07830285,0.5783393,0.00732301,0.0003330624,0.0000861174,0.00008453256,0.1749005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8628705,0.03264532,0.04469896,0.0483387,0.006992066,0.001074227,0.00005920583,0.0001291969,0.003191771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3820891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018307866","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jht056","title":"The Hippocratic Thorn in Bioethics' Hide: Cults, Sects, and Strangeness","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hippocratic Oath; Bioethics; Strangeness; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Traditional medicine; Law; Medicine; Political science; Physics; Particle physics","authors":[{"name":"Tom Koch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.183002663332198,"gpt":0.4620802150048725,"spread":0.2790775516726745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01534711,0.0004007824,0.0008509464,0.001983019,0.01239999,0.01420397,0.001271211,0.006988967,0.002475549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02990425,0.0004656825,0.0004706985,0.001902915,0.1110967,0.01988532,0.009047167,0.01716906,0.0007480857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006967546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007085135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004827377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007911681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886092,0.006613488,0.0003271381,0.0005640581,0.00314083,0.0007452558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690716,0.02343991,0.002194477,0.001972573,0.001742525,0.001578978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002109469,0.000007670622,0.0001737504,0.00006521895,0.000006876269,0.00009674044,0.03063346,0.00004336347,0.00006414637,0.9320276,0.02916274,0.007697272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002514256,0.00001881661,0.0004656888,0.0004105443,0.000008794904,0.0002450203,0.01767324,0.0001755855,0.0001319315,0.7186033,0.2622122,0.00002988233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01424396,0.05378314,0.005198487,0.8359397,0.009174899,0.00001345225,0.00002335465,0.00007412458,0.08154889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7844671,0.02279151,0.004223937,0.143541,0.01428273,0.00005174548,0.00002635872,0.000294511,0.03032114],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01534711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08116424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092623743","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.3.319.2984","title":"Human Cloning: Three Mistakes and an Alternative","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Reproductive Biology and Fertility","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Framing (construction); Human cloning; Cloning (programming); Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Human enhancement; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Risk analysis (engineering); Law and economics; Computer science; Business; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Fran�oise Baylis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1989171554816026,"gpt":0.3801533712915784,"spread":0.1812362158099758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03997523,0.001128924,0.001375413,0.002362486,0.006969572,0.01065975,0.004422202,0.02415197,0.002622815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04253004,0.0005396509,0.001344518,0.001796199,0.1013707,0.01913358,0.01037556,0.02190322,0.001001112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006621299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006868284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002969183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002218777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9626784,0.02419313,0.001239782,0.002394299,0.008008819,0.001485714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649876,0.02317047,0.001531925,0.004374582,0.004305828,0.001629656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002013171,0.000005704293,0.00005565284,0.00004714136,0.000004384312,0.00009489836,0.002428996,0.00007283565,0.00004400978,0.9882109,0.004866884,0.004148408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001944993,0.00001974198,0.00007026238,0.0002345159,0.000008214093,0.0001734663,0.002378531,0.0002342379,0.00006928821,0.9262174,0.07055569,0.00001926815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005078325,0.01852844,0.01852849,0.8981804,0.00700975,0.00002275612,0.00003753697,0.00007026727,0.05254402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5910712,0.02261692,0.02918609,0.3171428,0.01321714,0.0003539227,0.00005044073,0.0002019747,0.02615957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03997523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2114118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001641223","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhz040","title":"Transhumanism, Moral Perfection, and Those 76 Trombones","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transhumanism; Humanism; Sociology; Human enhancement; Epistemology; Dystopia; Environmental ethics; The Imaginary; Ideology; Ethos; Posthuman; Technoscience; Futurist; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Political science; Politics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Tom Koch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1796080317342715,"gpt":0.366423868914119,"spread":0.1868158371798475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004926836,0.0003496069,0.0002919674,0.0008074081,0.006905996,0.00850016,0.0006127777,0.003157982,0.005257033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005458827,0.0001855326,0.0002124854,0.0005711621,0.0705678,0.006605648,0.006147574,0.005523031,0.0004721685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004116287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004143734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004562784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006649486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964941,0.002289226,0.00006108572,0.0003213288,0.0004541824,0.0003801954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975358,0.001131997,0.0002894873,0.0003631054,0.0003078985,0.0003717073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006009822,0.00000638063,0.0001406018,0.00002073425,0.000001907754,0.00004248935,0.005794649,0.00003684557,0.00004896005,0.9853403,0.004462945,0.004098263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001165269,0.00002019972,0.000527133,0.0002308224,0.000004371072,0.0001726915,0.008741323,0.0001394798,0.0001600984,0.7431748,0.2468023,0.00001517202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03583934,0.03560781,0.006676238,0.153844,0.001726193,0.00002525608,0.00002979296,0.00005287436,0.7661985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9110749,0.00763624,0.00230622,0.01594539,0.0005375225,0.00005341751,0.00001828493,0.00004402276,0.06238401],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00850016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02986586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061815728","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr034","title":"Questions in Contemporary Medicine and the Philosophy of Charles Taylor: An Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Epistemology; Theme (computing); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Franco A. Carnevale","is_ca":true},{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.202266370524429,"gpt":0.3763780784174485,"spread":0.1741117078930195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005699183,0.0008544677,0.0009672329,0.004823949,0.005427607,0.006483089,0.001433881,0.008078003,0.004294532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01000041,0.0005716283,0.0007706702,0.004056665,0.02054597,0.01122788,0.003106454,0.009362726,0.001100586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007786982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005469671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004144311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003235732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949745,0.002953697,0.0002749561,0.0003482061,0.001171008,0.0002776575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988315,0.009962507,0.0003409808,0.0001915191,0.0008739207,0.0003161129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001893534,0.00004255298,0.0001419009,0.00042275,0.000005639755,0.0001151314,0.00855469,0.0002576782,0.0001445794,0.884761,0.08353967,0.02199551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004835724,0.00001620663,0.0001830895,0.0007614028,0.000002986539,0.0001502784,0.001685732,0.0002029076,0.00006054235,0.2830544,0.7138615,0.00001614231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003026193,0.5111504,0.01418643,0.3282406,0.0236393,0.0001188057,0.0001137804,0.0000557003,0.1194688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1461615,0.5227501,0.03066423,0.1169038,0.1175874,0.0007422746,0.0002201453,0.0002650727,0.06470557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008078003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05649871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070274352","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.5.523.10321","title":"Conflicting Interests, Social Justice and Proxy Consent to Research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Ignorance; Mandate; Research ethics; Normative; Institutional review board; Law; Economic Justice; Proxy (statistics); Political science; Clinical equipoise; Veil of ignorance; Public relations; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Clinical trial; Medicine; Alternative medicine","authors":[{"name":"Daryl Pullman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7009016491116048,"gpt":0.5976475664850377,"spread":0.1032540826265671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2343855,0.001565336,0.002959437,0.004037518,0.01160597,0.01672578,0.006566352,0.02644803,0.006530275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2361372,0.001334911,0.001824776,0.005171805,0.1352271,0.02258442,0.01968545,0.01907455,0.001222233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01385679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02795155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006283593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005962394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6417772,0.2894715,0.01105598,0.01999694,0.02898855,0.008709891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6711168,0.2751719,0.01841984,0.01826112,0.01248869,0.004541793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139118,0.00001014757,0.0001467095,0.00006357499,0.00001148925,0.0001020445,0.002549791,0.0001297821,0.00002027801,0.9924826,0.00126352,0.003206189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002783493,0.00001964159,0.0001124479,0.0002333465,0.000009686344,0.0001384106,0.0006688242,0.0002430306,0.00005657778,0.9802307,0.01824177,0.00001779092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01677593,0.03564507,0.2157009,0.2319938,0.002854047,0.001476337,0.000231928,0.0001221923,0.4951998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.760158,0.01570981,0.09353728,0.09315702,0.004378898,0.004870214,0.0001739153,0.0001686891,0.0278462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.973552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.944139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392282422","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae002","title":"Beyond Conceptual Analysis: Social Objectivity and Conceptual Engineering to Define Disease","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Theoretical definition; Conceptual framework; Naturalism; Disease; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Anne‐Marie Gagné‐Julien","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09479008579706479,"gpt":0.3330123147658371,"spread":0.2382222289687724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05019364,0.001331822,0.001729602,0.00673534,0.006032244,0.01492057,0.004003939,0.00531501,0.003113473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02977744,0.0005883698,0.002002446,0.003751995,0.1162943,0.02550224,0.01085485,0.01009549,0.0004800238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009603092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009157915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003292682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001670792,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9532303,0.03844395,0.001420549,0.001934582,0.004036654,0.0009339692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572991,0.03095549,0.002857912,0.004772845,0.00307516,0.001039546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001661974,0.000004599452,0.00004585203,0.00002268648,0.000004822511,0.00001199606,0.001642643,0.0001105074,0.00001949923,0.9971054,0.0001982634,0.0008320244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053617,0.000005501846,0.00003546642,0.00006300644,0.000003478685,0.00002565487,0.001030512,0.0004890779,0.00005528515,0.9907458,0.007533919,0.000006949853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02100252,0.01269609,0.6591485,0.1428915,0.002042568,0.0003124658,0.0001189998,0.0001949384,0.1615923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8277197,0.003952873,0.1483903,0.01105083,0.001303345,0.001058197,0.0001436201,0.000193099,0.006188015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05019364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2654525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211001172","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab034","title":"Access-to-Care and Conscience: Conflicting or Coherent?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Medicine; Nursing; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Joel L. Gamble","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nathan Gamble","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1933577781404203,"gpt":0.4551388334796588,"spread":0.2617810553392386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03211041,0.0005836594,0.001477835,0.002959615,0.008195546,0.01878535,0.003159997,0.01177157,0.005148792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06271608,0.0007353111,0.0009087828,0.002397,0.1179989,0.03275007,0.01822149,0.01689385,0.0006527528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006636532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01018736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00373377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9597371,0.02504333,0.002310408,0.002592149,0.007269674,0.003047359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9560118,0.02740257,0.003964701,0.004212572,0.004121273,0.004287114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008767428,0.00001088871,0.0002051022,0.00004066408,0.000005479802,0.00006842072,0.005407249,0.00004260405,0.00002829615,0.9890675,0.001524486,0.003590575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001653775,0.00001207026,0.0004609938,0.0002130444,0.000005919047,0.0001042563,0.004533848,0.0002138312,0.00003040418,0.9824548,0.01193138,0.00002287586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03484593,0.01893441,0.04240414,0.5981389,0.002737453,0.0001142303,0.00009062954,0.00008549137,0.3026488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.947094,0.003543131,0.008476241,0.03217162,0.001990006,0.0002131329,0.00004273856,0.0000638467,0.006405397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03211041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1698181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092322817","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhp016","title":"Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Reproductive Freedom, and Deliberative Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Stanford Law School; University College Dublin; University of Exeter; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Egalitarianism; Normative; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Libertarianism; Deliberation; Harm principle; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Harm; Politics; Philosophy; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Colin Farrelly","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09174335687241228,"gpt":0.3663359980491925,"spread":0.2745926411767803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019578,0.0004413846,0.0005216189,0.0009470175,0.004480089,0.005186978,0.001398359,0.006435815,0.003048942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01280857,0.0002609277,0.0007219122,0.0008038335,0.04955386,0.005753923,0.005913302,0.006811351,0.0003630316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004375657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005189361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001666102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001568306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859619,0.009962519,0.0002967782,0.001018874,0.001623183,0.001136748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883972,0.008237718,0.00119135,0.001075628,0.0005724089,0.0005257764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003078689,0.000004640297,0.00005213235,0.000007682662,0.000001479703,0.00001271122,0.0004307393,0.000192897,0.00001426404,0.9983107,0.0002405778,0.0007290775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007442746,0.00000807975,0.00006036296,0.00002884964,0.000001814153,0.0000316555,0.0002566206,0.0002493386,0.00007305592,0.9898937,0.00938487,0.000004316644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04476036,0.007623891,0.2532132,0.2566325,0.0008283579,0.0001568173,0.0000761852,0.00008413524,0.4366246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537572,0.001698185,0.01940677,0.01469745,0.0003387129,0.0002417152,0.00002696977,0.00002489847,0.009808119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1035396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586441227","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw039","title":"What Does the Patient Say? Levinas and Medical Ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing ethics; Obligation; Face (sociological concept); Analogy; Medical ethics; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Situational ethics; Military medical ethics; Subject (documents); Applied ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Nursing; Medicine; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Lawrence R. Burns","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.136994691747695,"gpt":0.3698089647717714,"spread":0.2328142730240764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01235761,0.0004450947,0.0005425417,0.0008374278,0.008297615,0.007556233,0.001121568,0.009646394,0.001529673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01651968,0.0002960818,0.0005015884,0.0007187134,0.08839971,0.009800285,0.006502695,0.008683765,0.0004343073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008853763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007096926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004403342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003060613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9718004,0.02451048,0.0005073193,0.001004781,0.001174565,0.001002463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988245,0.009513929,0.0007357788,0.0003655801,0.0005462284,0.0005934373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009006104,0.000007684861,0.000150387,0.0000385769,0.000003309365,0.0002182125,0.05383189,0.00007142603,0.00008298494,0.9412238,0.002232622,0.002130148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001244226,0.00002208457,0.0001617554,0.0003009406,0.000004704781,0.0004807577,0.02573964,0.0002244132,0.000152206,0.8984201,0.07445935,0.00002163499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04787405,0.02299086,0.02128734,0.6835289,0.00123346,0.00009265367,0.00003712445,0.00005365641,0.222902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357545,0.004855318,0.005727846,0.04148954,0.0003984216,0.0001533533,0.00001373479,0.00003318447,0.011574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01235761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06535405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986756938","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr025","title":"What Is Human in Humans? Responses from Biology, Anthropology, and Philosophy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Technoscience; Humanity; Context (archaeology); Philosophy of science; Environmental ethics; Galileo (satellite navigation); Ideology; Philosophy of biology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Biology; Political science; Geography; Law","authors":[{"name":"G. Bibeau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2190452649296354,"gpt":0.374995550624123,"spread":0.1559502856944875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01333366,0.0006512688,0.0007890475,0.001924719,0.010107,0.008898636,0.0009812439,0.009655624,0.003373398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109168,0.0003730418,0.0004611313,0.001476848,0.1039388,0.01534998,0.007474628,0.01448169,0.0004854056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005658001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003322487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003559487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003152957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886175,0.009291843,0.0002077614,0.0006107021,0.000824291,0.0004479552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859717,0.01120802,0.0007925614,0.0004388323,0.0007317708,0.0008570408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001743521,0.00002187866,0.0003962833,0.0001048,0.000008264623,0.00019128,0.1730745,0.0001040837,0.000148304,0.7996507,0.01695795,0.009324411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001288137,0.00003091844,0.0006815037,0.0005859488,0.000006719401,0.0004132823,0.2074823,0.0001502327,0.000163775,0.516654,0.2737858,0.00003269948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01216841,0.02450415,0.00207977,0.9056609,0.00197254,0.00001467892,0.00001663789,0.00001462421,0.0535683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7582158,0.03120026,0.002349808,0.191741,0.003679805,0.00008758116,0.00003149123,0.00005281253,0.01264141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01333366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07051599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130179557","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.3.285.3022","title":"Acculturating Human Experimentation: An Empirical Survey in France","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Transactional leadership; Psychology; Aptitude; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Social science; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology; History","authors":[{"name":"Sverine Mathieu","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anne Fagot-Largeault","is_ca":false},{"name":"Philippe Amiel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6591876307650544,"gpt":0.5955553106546103,"spread":0.06363232011044406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0253402,0.0004892242,0.0006452029,0.003728662,0.004053922,0.00482375,0.001342852,0.003237443,0.002264294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072209,0.0006114719,0.0003827255,0.003018561,0.005916207,0.002401252,0.001838437,0.00229288,0.0003736681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004914804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003877164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01187211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01259201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9533317,0.03744583,0.001490857,0.001510614,0.004407063,0.001813911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8544449,0.1127349,0.01653121,0.003396047,0.00836936,0.00452363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002906214,0.001103734,0.2894225,0.0007100034,0.00008846009,0.002714562,0.6298957,0.000305177,0.004526088,0.005396469,0.001321725,0.06422497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003317241,0.001862941,0.40775,0.0007061103,0.00005001571,0.003629643,0.5271968,0.001167431,0.002102968,0.0008765002,0.054505,0.0001194536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943052,0.001465362,0.0009482563,0.0008885234,0.00001159322,0.0000616766,0.00003824236,0.00001574731,0.002265316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996646,0.001140389,0.0006064227,0.0004887898,0.00001844726,0.00008255324,0.00004585417,0.000009889601,0.00096162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.995946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1340134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396871968","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae021","title":"Ethical Problems of Observational Studies and Big Data Compared to Randomized Trials","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta Hospital; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Temptation; Randomized controlled trial; Context (archaeology); Informed consent; Psychology; Medicine; Research ethics; Randomized experiment; Medical physics; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Surgery; Psychiatry; History","authors":[{"name":"Jean Raymond","is_ca":true},{"name":"Robert Fahed","is_ca":true},{"name":"Tim E. Darsaut","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8855603813236204,"gpt":0.6170519194353139,"spread":0.2685084618883065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7888477,0.002433907,0.00788109,0.007656504,0.005111585,0.01915726,0.007949384,0.01537052,0.008118862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8774527,0.003517958,0.004072007,0.0092079,0.06245693,0.02478445,0.01636958,0.02645661,0.001649911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01148024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02117029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002489333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001741992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.0730394,0.8619809,0.02346841,0.01099208,0.02950957,0.001009652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03522435,0.8900794,0.02208521,0.0389894,0.01200085,0.001620721],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001406154,0.0001271355,0.002979678,0.004556438,0.002041505,0.0002910416,0.005428206,0.002120458,0.000140781,0.8842862,0.01775472,0.07886772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009110827,0.000249494,0.000965639,0.004801396,0.0002964448,0.0003408224,0.0007621511,0.003244177,0.0002207158,0.9560467,0.03203757,0.0001238929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00754662,0.05408883,0.4297945,0.4473033,0.0177306,0.006160946,0.001328287,0.0003590058,0.03568785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2761215,0.01944372,0.425689,0.210945,0.03180214,0.03200148,0.0004810354,0.0005243227,0.002991776],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2111523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2603884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146720863","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaa037","title":"Religion at Work in Bioethics and Biopolicy: Christian Bioethicists, Secular Language, Suspicious Orthodoxy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Dignity; Deference; Orthodoxy; Law; Sociology; Secularism; Legislation; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Russell Blackford","is_ca":false},{"name":"Udo Schüklenk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1860090117620325,"gpt":0.4661395546763774,"spread":0.2801305429143449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01726941,0.0002834817,0.0005122173,0.001873939,0.01073103,0.01221841,0.001573839,0.01107003,0.003184004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02309058,0.0003595738,0.0003597534,0.001678107,0.1047115,0.01397978,0.007999213,0.01410773,0.0004251459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006722607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008780084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00570753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007043707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863417,0.01091485,0.0002449801,0.0005429744,0.001288299,0.0006672392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730588,0.021081,0.001583464,0.001078617,0.001221185,0.001976858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001516667,0.00003430594,0.0005537928,0.00005270716,0.000002848501,0.0001216758,0.02240506,0.00004324456,0.00005906108,0.9611169,0.00850204,0.007093264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002797174,0.00002180628,0.0009061596,0.0005620965,0.000005303269,0.0001865949,0.02209369,0.000230437,0.0001055558,0.9241824,0.05165952,0.00001847335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03332359,0.03392066,0.001844505,0.8680072,0.001505629,0.00001269058,0.00001413051,0.00001315651,0.06135845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9033185,0.008992231,0.001416103,0.07453133,0.002887783,0.00005310253,0.0000115448,0.00003503649,0.008754376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01726941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09133053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560663898","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw031","title":"Narrative Aversion: Challenges for the Illness Narrative Advocate","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Personal narrative; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Kathy Behrendt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1216001969544379,"gpt":0.3678191349692532,"spread":0.2462189380148154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08278402,0.0007122892,0.001198451,0.001724013,0.02173967,0.02479491,0.004371847,0.0269888,0.007152054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08573387,0.0007013137,0.001155683,0.0009735874,0.08274473,0.03698399,0.02732728,0.05154409,0.001995108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009545531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02319836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004377136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003458911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9491124,0.03672606,0.001484599,0.002782861,0.007095403,0.002798756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9194924,0.05971332,0.003718548,0.002857099,0.005757128,0.008461418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000165364,0.0000361357,0.0001758253,0.00009184729,0.000006669989,0.0002676792,0.04711428,0.00009892983,0.00009761766,0.9132865,0.02903354,0.009774399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004112202,0.00002555531,0.00009766037,0.0007033857,0.00001178797,0.0006260934,0.0572889,0.0005005032,0.0001232806,0.7039301,0.2366131,0.00003843118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00391579,0.005349178,0.007224081,0.9486373,0.001974074,0.00003020914,0.000007994509,0.00003671013,0.03282466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5456259,0.01200092,0.01927511,0.387134,0.006252124,0.0004148557,0.00003596879,0.0002065985,0.02905453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08278402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.437809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588017142","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw066","title":"The Ethical Principles of the Portuguese Psychologists: A Universal Dimension","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Psychological Association","keywords":"Portuguese; Dimension (graph theory); Adaptation (eye); Engineering ethics; Ethical values; Bioethics; Point (geometry); Ethical issues; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Miguel Ricou","is_ca":false},{"name":"Eduardo Marques de Sá","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rui Nunes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1254975883195261,"gpt":0.3846436385845627,"spread":0.2591460502650367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02073345,0.0002959921,0.0004512896,0.001030413,0.007027118,0.009477276,0.0007881116,0.003747848,0.001140817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02749001,0.0003966629,0.0003208759,0.001039947,0.0283898,0.002880048,0.00424285,0.004867309,0.0001951338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005384644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02193579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007288912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01141225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9729658,0.01599599,0.001313501,0.001182473,0.006103733,0.002438447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826318,0.009647997,0.001956077,0.001436219,0.002263582,0.002064283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001996663,0.00006079826,0.002696685,0.0002153994,0.00001129683,0.0004201609,0.06040971,0.0002146263,0.0005957955,0.8817225,0.007804769,0.0458283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004314323,0.00009552658,0.01766301,0.002997996,0.00002885873,0.002389921,0.06276014,0.0006411331,0.001209507,0.4063536,0.5057071,0.0001099149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.16997,0.0349175,0.03880002,0.2931924,0.002278636,0.0002763096,0.0001220984,0.0000914785,0.4603515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542485,0.005858408,0.0158908,0.01370692,0.0004244958,0.000117513,0.00002309885,0.00003693974,0.009693168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02073345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1096503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994542369","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr033","title":"Toward a Hermeneutical Conception of Medicine: A Conversation with Charles Taylor","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Library science; History of medicine; Sociology; Bioethics; Classics; Art history; History; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Charles Taylor","is_ca":true},{"name":"Franco A. Carnevale","is_ca":true},{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.205145896633878,"gpt":0.331308227443038,"spread":0.1261623308091599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03680753,0.0007109627,0.001293999,0.002407034,0.02720679,0.01105266,0.002550479,0.01683813,0.001612032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0385911,0.001118339,0.0008981939,0.002839966,0.06937923,0.01962692,0.005319723,0.03646731,0.0004550467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02690514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02185341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05586519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03334298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9554403,0.03672374,0.0004972366,0.001118985,0.00428093,0.001938826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536073,0.0405383,0.0009834191,0.0003333662,0.002603802,0.001933732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004009809,0.00004185973,0.000349275,0.000146938,0.00001219557,0.0007702609,0.4571074,0.0004280321,0.0005480493,0.4456165,0.08919248,0.005746918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003561369,0.00006612762,0.0004695006,0.0009266898,0.00001142226,0.0008363705,0.2554251,0.001404589,0.0003945298,0.1283192,0.6119307,0.0001800914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01093645,0.01586837,0.005833922,0.9462702,0.002556811,0.00005293696,0.00002019242,0.00002718275,0.01843392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5060389,0.01849354,0.01405955,0.4358466,0.003365669,0.0003372082,0.00003317133,0.0001964009,0.02162898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05586519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1952114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403596864","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae040","title":"The WEIRD Trio: The Cultural Gap between Physicians, Learners, and Patients in Pluralistic Societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lester Liao","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1907363616623692,"gpt":0.4108723786707293,"spread":0.2201360170083601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02913938,0.0004321323,0.0009154053,0.002333097,0.01607334,0.0156345,0.001958141,0.004671065,0.002033141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02980659,0.0005842513,0.0003875541,0.001740056,0.08635011,0.01934328,0.02205781,0.009697773,0.000264745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00581346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009745584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004241605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005468891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9611879,0.03166474,0.0008511839,0.001477425,0.003205067,0.001613528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976577,0.01524876,0.002323902,0.001410451,0.001228604,0.003211358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003998552,0.00004868858,0.003914278,0.0001124802,0.0000226013,0.0004540644,0.8283219,0.00004823726,0.000274782,0.1465717,0.002764212,0.01742693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000252902,0.00008498609,0.00382807,0.0007078197,0.00001925154,0.0008306843,0.8228939,0.0001802008,0.0001561049,0.1276048,0.0436268,0.0000421424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5511095,0.02752815,0.01357059,0.3451321,0.002027343,0.00006605074,0.00002905716,0.00006088636,0.06047648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763631,0.002410298,0.001893596,0.01767171,0.000285563,0.00005112505,0.00000657027,0.00002566457,0.001292387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02913938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1541055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172249225","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab007","title":"The Most Good You Can Do with Your Kidneys: Effective Altruism and the Organ-Shortage Problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Economic shortage; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Tonkens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03308947230173553,"gpt":0.3035110699703742,"spread":0.2704215976686387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02193695,0.0003753416,0.000794426,0.0007289391,0.00719357,0.006046032,0.001456838,0.009519001,0.003387474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01990433,0.0003609025,0.0007083805,0.0005236114,0.05018942,0.009186373,0.007734737,0.0107921,0.0005500037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004198604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005092094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001515034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001842992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9841351,0.0120289,0.0004137574,0.0008913802,0.001399611,0.00113121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985191,0.009374535,0.001605405,0.001161444,0.001096401,0.001571023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001365151,0.00002424601,0.0003258415,0.00004298006,0.000007907779,0.00009301185,0.001842238,0.0002721981,0.00006462928,0.9884213,0.004451634,0.0044404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001369697,0.00001913575,0.0002563037,0.00008871908,0.000006177936,0.0001794116,0.001241126,0.0004130117,0.00007549213,0.976005,0.02168787,0.00001401399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03367896,0.01046394,0.03789993,0.762208,0.001673609,0.00004911858,0.00003309019,0.00003135511,0.153962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9082369,0.004135011,0.01250308,0.05937584,0.001548027,0.0001314097,0.00001905044,0.00005064155,0.01400014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02193695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1160151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163932426","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jht045","title":"Rethinking Voluntary Euthanasia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Perspective (graphical); Morality; Health care; Personal autonomy; Sociology; Philosophical methodology; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Byron J. Stoyles","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sorin Costreie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.244207997732426,"gpt":0.4615473046845997,"spread":0.2173393069521737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05717792,0.0004623108,0.0006956812,0.001072585,0.007319033,0.009342455,0.003228009,0.01345806,0.001277527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07062719,0.0004157297,0.0007838436,0.0005420263,0.07932301,0.01517584,0.009669088,0.02130399,0.0003857253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005917567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01360928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00617521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9434962,0.04162824,0.001752424,0.002773839,0.008304136,0.002045066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9340978,0.05439485,0.002027702,0.00378217,0.004690439,0.001007108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000605258,0.00000729514,0.00007169451,0.00003616438,0.000003630923,0.0000614472,0.01019632,0.0001347899,0.0001082009,0.9829676,0.002108335,0.004298566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001430499,0.00001817567,0.0001567908,0.0003886045,0.000007996481,0.0001634977,0.004427734,0.0004593175,0.0002504555,0.9080627,0.08602693,0.00002348249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03872335,0.01344502,0.1163073,0.6519213,0.01038305,0.0001055937,0.00002865032,0.0001230918,0.1689626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8667209,0.004563992,0.01877976,0.09532424,0.003108307,0.000204902,0.00002104023,0.0001359028,0.01114095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05717792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3023893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167210268","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhn025","title":"Public Health Insurance under a Nonbenevolent State","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Public health; State (computer science); Library science; Philosophy of medicine; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Nursing; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Pierre Lemieux","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3327493158140065,"gpt":0.3501457519442527,"spread":0.01739643613024622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003501495,0.000195335,0.0004188799,0.0004328396,0.002268287,0.00350624,0.0004451815,0.002544993,0.004222112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004749228,0.0002727172,0.0006000603,0.000332708,0.005197585,0.003773665,0.002324517,0.002481746,0.0002604657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002544781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003102707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004479551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003743934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976031,0.0008801796,0.00007304746,0.0003614693,0.0004130787,0.0006692267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972554,0.00113126,0.0005737341,0.000431555,0.0002424913,0.000365541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001822789,0.00002201078,0.0006517651,0.000005163481,0.000005489247,0.00003831449,0.00008948183,0.0012805,0.00008858875,0.9963362,0.0002948552,0.001169415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006294335,0.00009080376,0.00186476,0.00003062162,0.00002925248,0.00008293932,0.0002798426,0.01859437,0.0003025029,0.9716419,0.006999698,0.00002042616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6241376,0.0008206828,0.03629174,0.02856698,0.0001866936,0.00006710472,0.0001927759,0.00008290926,0.3096535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954076,0.0001471712,0.0006374853,0.0004550932,0.00008175764,0.00001687093,0.00001421412,0.000003547067,0.003236121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004479551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01851785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156828052","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr050","title":"The Medical Minimum: Zero","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Health Services Management and Policy","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Forcing (mathematics); Zero (linguistics); Government (linguistics); Health care; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jan Narveson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2579254371691364,"gpt":0.4582681134972947,"spread":0.2003426763281584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01266555,0.0005445246,0.001373273,0.0009742879,0.0050349,0.006503703,0.00167765,0.01001386,0.01233739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03420154,0.0003738994,0.0007885397,0.0005271834,0.02722761,0.01212841,0.00473774,0.01625718,0.003404631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005936537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007568773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002774043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002222944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9853684,0.006668035,0.000696238,0.001994657,0.003917327,0.00135535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901193,0.005149104,0.0007248735,0.001104458,0.001986649,0.0009155276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001962227,0.00001049201,0.00006776353,0.00006648354,0.00000462666,0.00001517926,0.0003296641,0.0000544929,0.00007678584,0.9690604,0.02470842,0.005586148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002370024,0.00002701575,0.0002172182,0.0003478721,0.000009282006,0.0000722537,0.0003664623,0.0001367088,0.0001830813,0.8538108,0.1447873,0.00001834965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006448389,0.01608477,0.01729296,0.7514905,0.008164768,0.00003556587,0.0001959151,0.0001449435,0.2001421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5392902,0.009021692,0.01653433,0.373134,0.0114992,0.0003117066,0.0002340888,0.0002930631,0.04968172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01266555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06698257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}