{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":54,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":54,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"78c6d215392a","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine"}},"results":[{"id":"W2152273753","doi":"10.1080/03605310490500545","title":"Minimal Risk as an International Ethical Standard in Research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration of Helsinki; Harm; Declaration; Commission; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Informed consent; Political science; Research ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine","authors":[{"name":"Loretta M. Kopelman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3681491076343622,"gpt":0.5496925389063827,"spread":0.1815434312720205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02814509,0.0006722829,0.003873244,0.001767648,0.0003558706,0.00001797539,0.0008139357,0.002056376,0.00005587981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008335103,0.0003632754,0.0003739395,0.0008508565,0.01020777,0.000148024,0.0002088046,0.01187455,0.000001045358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001963759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001861488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00113263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000568279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913942,0.001545817,0.003100737,0.0005583811,0.002776632,0.0006242354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877018,0.006595547,0.001965097,0.0006653588,0.002258006,0.0008141408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006403708,0.0003443478,0.0001928088,0.05927491,0.000964638,0.0002959114,0.01238067,0.000001238077,0.000002222022,0.6336357,0.001462436,0.2850414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006436965,0.02069854,0.000007737904,0.06558561,0.001765515,0.001235367,0.001518706,0.000008751926,0.00000108093,0.5683023,0.3342061,0.0002333274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001493297,0.6877015,0.00002592572,0.3085713,0.0006939523,0.001076629,0.0001514432,0.000007178209,0.001622739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03401095,0.9538054,0.0004691606,0.002914856,0.008588209,0.00002000121,0.00008819831,0.00008534539,0.0000178165],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3327437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120330028","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr029","title":"Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Agency (philosophy); Informed consent; Sketch; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Social science; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"N. Stoljar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3040720228245374,"gpt":0.3606201212223293,"spread":0.0565480983977919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001441551,0.0001855282,0.0005527599,0.0002221932,0.0003229068,0.00000302836,0.0001280815,0.00009957972,0.0002194771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002304018,0.0001023664,0.00006532064,0.00005299169,0.008337053,0.0001223487,0.00003296513,0.0003490871,2.6709e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009644231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000251808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003333835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001441456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983031,0.0000795951,0.001004897,0.0001028826,0.000339059,0.0001704593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969411,0.001452315,0.0009134334,0.0001333801,0.000344722,0.0002150739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009289568,0.00005497576,0.0008232647,0.001086714,0.0001170428,7.690286e-7,0.04738236,1.493297e-7,0.00001989595,0.9462731,0.002352291,0.0009604207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004965852,0.006727651,0.0003355717,0.002189467,0.0003452902,0.00008860795,0.0127171,0.00001769652,0.00002468777,0.9579735,0.01449941,0.0001151702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0825585,0.05072378,0.000277286,0.7505826,0.002460188,0.001292399,0.0003118133,0.00001691655,0.1117765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868538,0.006315415,0.0002982538,0.004665915,0.001779631,0.000003698366,0.00001324745,0.00001145681,0.00005857779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9042953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153910246","doi":"10.1080/03605310590960193","title":"From the Local to the Global: Bioethics and the Concept of Culture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Sociology; Ethnic group; Scholarship; Socialization; Health care; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Social science; Political science; Law; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Leigh Turner","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1492080553828382,"gpt":0.4694337881044592,"spread":0.320225732721621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02648044,0.0003868193,0.001153287,0.00008271482,0.001616124,0.000008416694,0.001041418,0.0006417931,0.00005388842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01345616,0.0001326449,0.0001426308,0.0004336581,0.03992346,0.0001324897,0.0003517475,0.005942667,0.000001455709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004052085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002783997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002444457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004857181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926843,0.003135975,0.001864732,0.000273937,0.001604815,0.00043621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625852,0.03330235,0.00185848,0.0006508275,0.001242338,0.0003608118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003040459,0.00004721986,0.0002154562,0.0003078361,0.000352613,0.000002135328,0.06365185,0.00001101254,0.00002383896,0.894462,0.03232876,0.005556802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008824787,0.002441962,0.00006848476,0.003136921,0.001053125,0.00007762372,0.06498586,0.0001651093,0.00002509911,0.8487739,0.0703146,0.0001325258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001773863,0.05401812,0.002804955,0.9358405,0.0009791568,0.001226132,0.0001596817,0.000008950272,0.003188567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564336,0.01823063,0.0004033803,0.1159128,0.008944558,0.00001437527,0.000009745529,0.00002555631,0.0000253691],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8546597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1757378269","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhv063","title":"Beyond (Models of) Disability?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Oppression; Medical model of disability; Value (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Ontology; Disability studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Gender studies; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1243529322203259,"gpt":0.3817393267353224,"spread":0.2573863945149965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005669402,0.0001820609,0.0006795914,0.0001279839,0.0003178456,0.000004483702,0.0003277326,0.0001792932,0.000050553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009310084,0.00007464114,0.000121174,0.0002095425,0.02795547,0.0002634821,0.00004852745,0.0002395112,1.431171e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002342171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009433868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008050653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001324017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974552,0.0003222644,0.0009698287,0.0001680662,0.0008570203,0.0002276608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954017,0.002681225,0.0008363641,0.0002510399,0.0005980495,0.0002316437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006404863,0.00009519745,0.0006692111,0.0002613791,0.00009857987,6.535437e-7,0.01271923,0.000001320177,0.0006188765,0.9724883,0.0008363028,0.01157045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003210932,0.002630304,0.00009780797,0.001071792,0.0002719096,0.0000134885,0.00567708,0.00001471425,0.0001486726,0.9837956,0.002971736,0.00009596948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02352757,0.005836418,0.0009226064,0.9557637,0.0005287192,0.0004850598,0.00004117553,0.000006781121,0.01288794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882019,0.008492715,0.0001297318,0.001019404,0.002101428,0.000002572114,0.000002285221,0.00001158361,0.00003833568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9646744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9746899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029475285","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr024","title":"Multicultural Medicine and the Politics of Recognition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Cultural Competency in Health Care","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Personhood; Vision; Negotiation; Politics; Cultural diversity; Value (mathematics); Ethnic group; Diversity (politics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Social science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Laurence J. Kirmayer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.237167662634781,"gpt":0.3899814229674855,"spread":0.1528137603327046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006105031,0.0002508007,0.0009329622,0.0001938594,0.0006776638,0.000004185363,0.000353897,0.0002096787,0.00004763921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003213511,0.0001067927,0.000100846,0.0002839107,0.0222336,0.0001487845,0.00006152735,0.0006377858,1.518859e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002090562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008767704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00411051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001847164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969928,0.0004546535,0.001218295,0.0001625331,0.0008647272,0.0003069969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936875,0.003194423,0.001266895,0.0001983893,0.001354784,0.000298053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001783444,0.00004352466,0.0002686675,0.0008272756,0.0001846679,0.00000338168,0.1948316,2.878998e-7,0.0001870164,0.7970257,0.002190902,0.002653549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007953996,0.00440988,0.0001707749,0.002799299,0.0007405044,0.0001143571,0.0635641,0.00003347246,0.00006520189,0.9172782,0.002737613,0.0001325818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05349854,0.04596378,0.00003549662,0.890525,0.0009945784,0.0009652893,0.00004689023,0.00001100222,0.007959411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664735,0.02525801,0.0002264455,0.004493518,0.003503777,0.000005155294,0.000007575358,0.00001328505,0.00001880261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993666335","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr026","title":"How Should Political Philosophers Think of Health?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Politics; Metaphysics; Political philosophy; Health care; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Equity (law); Public health; Perspective (graphical); Health policy; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Medicine; Law; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3967469227560448,"gpt":0.4834581242385131,"spread":0.08671120148246825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009653438,0.0003509987,0.001480841,0.0004711077,0.0006863808,0.000002992844,0.000445955,0.0004215991,0.00006446437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001904727,0.0001913853,0.0001377105,0.0003573968,0.005853816,0.0001957024,0.000104279,0.001464533,4.375026e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006228563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006610415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002701751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000327521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995102,0.0008640519,0.00221265,0.0002222568,0.0008275935,0.0007714769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925998,0.002624411,0.002526907,0.0004280751,0.001108081,0.000712722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007873586,0.000115524,0.0007507886,0.002913375,0.0001591647,0.000001055576,0.03462239,1.338955e-7,0.00006924323,0.944093,0.01348829,0.002999672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004810171,0.008031309,0.0004250312,0.003419709,0.000235707,0.0000634584,0.03295489,0.00002460544,0.00003302495,0.9358267,0.01402127,0.0001541855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006821083,0.01574236,0.0005553807,0.9649556,0.001501379,0.0009592224,0.00006522682,0.00001308744,0.009386722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494573,0.006284405,0.0004691952,0.03860871,0.005072806,0.00001206088,0.00001386472,0.00003823893,0.00004344372],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9426362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146685042","doi":"10.1080/03605310500499203","title":"The Ethics and Science of Placebo-Controlled Trials: Assay Sensitivity and the Duhem–Quine Thesis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Appeal; Placebo; Clinical trial; Assay sensitivity; Aside; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Alternative medicine; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Internal medicine","authors":[{"name":"James Anderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3941801818369858,"gpt":0.5096282646228812,"spread":0.1154480827858955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2566108,0.000408473,0.002960382,0.0004016371,0.001230617,0.00002944503,0.0004471397,0.0005452321,0.000006812888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1577181,0.0001499958,0.0002972455,0.0005087962,0.05821423,0.0001215983,0.0002698335,0.004239298,9.516201e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002521816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006065151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004642933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001235362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891281,0.003738142,0.003072512,0.0004041418,0.003143333,0.0005137459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7919953,0.2027186,0.002091282,0.0005334745,0.002344694,0.0003166239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04188349,0.0001267016,0.0004137482,0.00133201,0.0006766299,0.00001346573,0.003574674,0.000003018157,0.004135542,0.9410676,0.000542298,0.006230872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04503039,0.0055726,0.0002404596,0.003375084,0.002154157,0.0004556386,0.002812143,0.0009013981,0.0007428669,0.9380782,0.000496514,0.0001406021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02578466,0.05458277,0.0006347906,0.9145099,0.0003408215,0.001644124,0.00003024992,0.000007463966,0.002465253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327902,0.06042447,0.0002869898,0.004047184,0.002362162,0.00001181573,0.000002555626,0.00002709984,0.00004751879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9104627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605486355","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhx006","title":"Truth or Spin? Disease Definition in Cancer Screening","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Epistemology; Disease; Objectivity (philosophy); Appeal; Philosophy of medicine; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Philosophy of science; Scope (computer science); Medicine; Philosophy; Pathology; Alternative medicine; Political science; Biology; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Lynette Reid","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3123465130889914,"gpt":0.4101933882912694,"spread":0.09784687520227808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002156335,0.0002365362,0.0006295546,0.0002489407,0.0008527625,0.00001914503,0.0003153422,0.00009015113,0.00015349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004041634,0.0001198243,0.0000770664,0.00004221973,0.004956792,0.0002077002,0.00004975028,0.0005191717,2.467505e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001224084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001007254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001196015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005490078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981573,0.00009811037,0.0008663346,0.0001588782,0.0004569971,0.0002623288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997447,0.000635486,0.001089365,0.0002735133,0.0002316998,0.000322965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005916161,0.00009299867,0.001838926,0.001499765,0.00009123884,0.00001225367,0.01012577,9.787486e-7,0.000009600991,0.9695705,0.001924273,0.008917543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008172951,0.00485275,0.0008789765,0.006422376,0.0003527716,0.00003692073,0.004843581,0.00007257261,0.000006810729,0.9645004,0.009695675,0.0001641801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0355749,0.03174263,0.00006368658,0.9199762,0.00217456,0.0005719711,0.0001812545,0.000007262922,0.009707553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752332,0.0119679,0.00008241396,0.006617595,0.006022007,0.000009025625,0.00001169699,0.00001973274,0.0000364133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9396583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093020889","doi":"10.1080/03605310701255735","title":"Equipoise and the Duty of Care in Clinical Research: A Philosophical Response to Our Critics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Constructive; Presupposition; Clinical equipoise; Duty; Epistemology; Sociology; Dimension (graph theory); Field (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine; Clinical trial; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Paul B. Miller","is_ca":true},{"name":"Charles Weijer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5969553625238638,"gpt":0.6108084616549729,"spread":0.0138530991311091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1262034,0.0003758075,0.002101837,0.001087935,0.0003164631,0.000009552054,0.0006802704,0.0008188114,0.00000783884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08301174,0.0001863485,0.0002612458,0.0009300174,0.02185421,0.00008352371,0.0004530829,0.005902825,4.277577e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005457624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000561149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002059142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001543936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989781,0.002105904,0.003737122,0.0004835964,0.003168586,0.0007238095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9329216,0.06098716,0.0008363731,0.0007596494,0.003620631,0.0008745596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1834569,0.0004073252,0.003391769,0.003719177,0.0003693372,0.0001396468,0.01637493,0.000001748483,0.000932343,0.7830415,0.0009674648,0.007197822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02652111,0.03505175,0.002042772,0.00836239,0.0005109159,0.0003806624,0.01549764,0.00003977147,0.0001708727,0.9100634,0.001197329,0.0001613769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1392247,0.02456855,0.0001680733,0.8330072,0.0003596132,0.0013581,0.00003288612,0.000005770093,0.001275043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649829,0.02067886,0.0006557875,0.01025413,0.003350855,0.000008729885,0.00000414148,0.0000443217,0.00002026403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8257582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014395762","doi":"10.1080/03605310490882975","title":"The Difference that Difference Makes: Bioethics and the Challenge of ?Disability?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Medical model of disability; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Tom Koch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.244372253378034,"gpt":0.4592056169332008,"spread":0.2148333635551668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03200014,0.0004459666,0.001419837,0.0001445504,0.002058573,0.000008876281,0.0009195762,0.0006724483,0.00001877336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01737099,0.0001746123,0.0001517184,0.0003018188,0.07751419,0.0001201158,0.0003227674,0.006695245,4.042146e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004503503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003117012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00137074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004008159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926394,0.002690884,0.002088534,0.0003301587,0.001714453,0.0005365845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9421268,0.05324365,0.002495219,0.0007451402,0.00103364,0.0003555854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003164347,0.0001018884,0.0007832463,0.001937242,0.000235651,0.00000267212,0.02471956,8.235563e-7,0.00008608047,0.9645928,0.0001696946,0.00420604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01249136,0.004015568,0.0005432036,0.005724135,0.0007116244,0.00006975333,0.02847139,0.0000459779,0.00003996183,0.9467623,0.0009645471,0.0001601525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01143169,0.04084429,0.001192243,0.9414936,0.0009848756,0.001212783,0.00003877386,0.00001098196,0.002790795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887503,0.09901877,0.0002072441,0.01116161,0.002031929,0.00002188617,0.000003698857,0.0000306627,0.00002117043],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9303319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132418305","doi":"10.1080/03605310591008603","title":"ICU Psychosis and Patient Autonomy: Some Thoughts from the Inside","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Connaught Fund; University of Alberta","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychosis; Personal autonomy; Psychology; Patient rights; Psychoanalysis; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Political science; Law; Health care","authors":[{"name":"Cheryl Misak","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1251813880495539,"gpt":0.3782367023058621,"spread":0.2530553142563081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002240948,0.0009115331,0.003842553,0.0005973238,0.0003885997,0.00001407203,0.0004275794,0.0006367009,0.00002188261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003449477,0.0004075271,0.000512198,0.0003947002,0.008782642,0.000140223,0.0001674078,0.002260297,7.877617e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006967138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003968669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001492928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001396656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953641,0.0004919875,0.002221547,0.0004729549,0.001005342,0.0004440761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882278,0.00532801,0.002413909,0.0005987246,0.002982351,0.0004491625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001624918,0.0001575871,0.00004019855,0.007851465,0.002684729,0.00003950223,0.007192621,1.678266e-7,0.000008931555,0.03205056,0.02063699,0.9277123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005367718,0.007435589,0.00001415537,0.05892785,0.009062416,0.000877968,0.003790896,0.000008076173,0.000005702291,0.2813036,0.632867,0.0003390182],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008140281,0.6572545,0.00004819904,0.3399382,0.0007125431,0.001250453,0.0001837452,0.000008514382,0.0005224409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007817899,0.9281788,0.00022571,0.05424115,0.009304491,0.00002606094,0.0001008958,0.00009370995,0.00001129891],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9273733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994632969","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr012","title":"Parental Wisdom, Empirical Blindness, and Normative Evaluation of Prenatal Genetic Enhancement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Virtue; Psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Tonkens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3494471633912644,"gpt":0.4154664060065492,"spread":0.0660192426152848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004255692,0.0002818172,0.0006882778,0.0003875397,0.0002463532,0.000004988529,0.0003339098,0.0001636736,0.00007793042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002114789,0.0001655672,0.00006563771,0.0003727968,0.01151816,0.0001745985,0.0001309116,0.0006576106,2.908951e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002080676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001247851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004660348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005830742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962034,0.0004258107,0.001390878,0.0002481803,0.001481364,0.0002503598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958556,0.001383124,0.001446402,0.0002619469,0.0008450257,0.0002079601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008762641,0.002346283,0.002908371,0.005040779,0.0008602934,0.00003093024,0.1155629,0.000009097729,0.1340213,0.6705375,0.004206757,0.05571314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008186004,0.01123391,0.0004344808,0.001894511,0.000745774,0.0002027682,0.002510327,0.0004912218,0.03756706,0.9363129,0.0002300431,0.0001910194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7002933,0.009620748,0.003085454,0.2803855,0.001204615,0.001875938,0.0001332322,0.00001483353,0.003386402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907627,0.004455083,0.0003175389,0.003743872,0.0006783524,0.00001318774,0.00000669184,0.00001821077,0.000004350966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2904694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122034985","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.3.339.2978","title":"Extending the Human Life Span","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Life expectancy; Life span; Demise; Natural selection; Longevity; Harm; Senescence; Biology; Human life; Disease; Environmental ethics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Evolutionary biology; Psychology; Sociology; Genetics; Medicine; Demography; Political science; Computer science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Walter Glannon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09592613166548251,"gpt":0.3223932760730495,"spread":0.2264671444075669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002421333,0.0002902262,0.000556781,0.0001373012,0.000448069,0.000009414051,0.000459417,0.0002124875,0.00003477737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005154106,0.0001482098,0.0001231938,0.0001214597,0.004540861,0.00001088957,0.0001133858,0.0005036769,3.670901e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005844946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002843556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006404583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000128565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980714,0.0001696583,0.0007841918,0.0002140927,0.0004812667,0.0002793624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980546,0.0002857543,0.0006909629,0.000401491,0.0003305725,0.0002366465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002439892,0.0007446862,0.006214796,0.002758454,0.002813916,0.00003128533,0.03902832,0.0001820057,0.218636,0.5955539,0.1073305,0.02426622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01086086,0.0176945,0.000565472,0.001356542,0.001395807,0.0007379056,0.004121242,0.000464021,0.005193882,0.915283,0.04176189,0.0005649218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1481279,0.09648108,0.002692343,0.7486999,0.0008116793,0.0006448962,0.00003554846,0.000008943672,0.002497645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692177,0.01864843,0.0001518409,0.007609645,0.0042796,0.000003268614,0.00001118372,0.00003095538,0.00004734301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8210898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127835924","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.1.35.3035","title":"On Risk and Decisional Capacity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Competence (human resources); Appeal; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Mental capacity; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"David Checkland","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.167895181112407,"gpt":0.4146168259716663,"spread":0.2467216448592592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006129887,0.0003212832,0.0008938857,0.0004377657,0.0003917369,0.000006408565,0.0002909678,0.0003429175,0.00008858763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002080158,0.0001630476,0.0001069298,0.0002530734,0.005195911,0.00006108631,0.00005308551,0.001223178,0.000001272746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001418607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005424659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000331426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001687921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969971,0.0004237661,0.001133428,0.0002837838,0.0008199252,0.0003419934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916057,0.006198739,0.0009568496,0.0003558503,0.0004530593,0.0004298079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01063346,0.0003584002,0.001847274,0.0003917906,0.0006490189,0.0002540755,0.01573862,0.000008270931,0.0001404252,0.789605,0.008889733,0.1714839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006716975,0.0107886,0.001362039,0.002064887,0.0002975734,0.002805143,0.002406341,0.00004782266,0.000006457086,0.9650324,0.008313284,0.0001584682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4673458,0.01952454,0.001203155,0.50553,0.001336461,0.0004615401,0.00008835524,0.00001098911,0.004499138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781072,0.01240039,0.0002250208,0.006611849,0.002599071,0.000003414517,0.000004404762,0.0000257804,0.00002286681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5107614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146787238","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhv013","title":"A Family-Oriented Decision-Making Model for Human Research in Mainland China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Peking University; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Mainland China; Harmony (color); China; Informed consent; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6488557554326542,"gpt":0.5878811024293545,"spread":0.06097465300329963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04579315,0.0003467616,0.001497845,0.001159202,0.0003730907,0.00001057844,0.0005367341,0.0006221924,0.00000612885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02138213,0.0001931284,0.0001726766,0.0007185063,0.008917595,0.0001226138,0.0002382402,0.003589103,2.69251e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008676211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006375611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002051256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008582931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937882,0.000378263,0.002046505,0.0004086755,0.002752497,0.0006258237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760868,0.01890678,0.0007328858,0.0005743016,0.003034416,0.0006647896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02060165,0.0004541105,0.002223143,0.002968771,0.0003110718,0.00005426541,0.01133097,0.00007810453,0.0008752119,0.9471992,0.005912904,0.007990617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01834494,0.01700521,0.0002290719,0.01239814,0.0002839541,0.0001880249,0.003225556,0.005843065,0.00002544664,0.9415451,0.0007551159,0.0001563827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.117273,0.02420889,0.01505801,0.8349281,0.0006459151,0.002603583,0.00007693149,0.00001512233,0.005190437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839143,0.006474738,0.003449111,0.003560588,0.002465609,0.00002308016,0.00001261019,0.0000535977,0.00004633161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8666413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070516711","doi":"10.1080/03605310600712851","title":"Bioethics as Ideology: Conditional and Unconditional Values","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Bioethics; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Tom Koch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3105860782129283,"gpt":0.5363035263583699,"spread":0.2257174481454415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02619384,0.0008416097,0.003817296,0.0008247765,0.001752155,0.000008251684,0.0006802978,0.002223003,0.0001751796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01453969,0.0004595335,0.0003213541,0.0004335475,0.03496318,0.0002170341,0.0003158606,0.0115112,0.000004362445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007619151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001276837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004937539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003882646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894317,0.003816799,0.003701551,0.0005110662,0.001913261,0.0006255569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417439,0.05053631,0.005066734,0.0004738449,0.001679965,0.0004992426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004719038,0.00008155598,0.00004290692,0.02938092,0.0007481559,0.00002587028,0.001838165,3.515554e-7,0.000001334748,0.9207191,0.0339539,0.01273576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003318231,0.003098685,0.000004750988,0.03253078,0.003181539,0.0006877812,0.001719917,0.00000499298,3.112969e-7,0.6319085,0.3233012,0.0002433097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001017776,0.6185794,0.0002265687,0.3744141,0.001093892,0.0009766435,0.0003769175,0.00001254089,0.004309801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003506901,0.9629524,0.0004500327,0.02172438,0.01065061,0.00004364848,0.0004787058,0.00008915314,0.0001041451],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3526897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157483961","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab004","title":"A Genealogy of Autonomy: Freedom, Paternalism, and the Future of the Doctor–Patient Relationship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Paternalism; Teleology; Bioethics; Obligation; Epistemology; Philosophical methodology; Beneficence; Sociology; Philosophy of medicine; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Quentin I. T. Genuis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1370333197505721,"gpt":0.4271301359723292,"spread":0.2900968162217571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01530346,0.0002590877,0.001091458,0.0001549103,0.0008164591,0.000002728558,0.0004501991,0.0005036324,0.00004776323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009032083,0.0001086482,0.0001495388,0.0003450924,0.01258617,0.00009463126,0.0002680975,0.003967459,1.665005e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000270235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005578824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003981867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007949691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931929,0.00331028,0.001982237,0.0001958887,0.001039262,0.0002794453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732769,0.0217836,0.002762951,0.0005266723,0.001446032,0.000203822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001840553,0.00006363448,0.003494673,0.00165398,0.0002861333,0.00000452008,0.03453188,0.000003835537,0.000237095,0.9544651,0.002043939,0.001374651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008968361,0.002113187,0.0007532454,0.003641483,0.0008929119,0.0001302575,0.01338396,0.00007759512,0.00007350193,0.9635363,0.006332634,0.00009652499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0497609,0.04889648,0.0003483184,0.8954598,0.001838053,0.0007785235,0.00006140544,0.000004425612,0.002852115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694562,0.01147221,0.0003533212,0.01536548,0.003280189,0.000009756795,0.00000605704,0.0000231508,0.00003364315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2832492673","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhy009","title":"An Epistemic Argument for Research-Practice Integration in Medicine","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fondation Brocher","keywords":"Elitism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Order (exchange); Sociology; Transformation (genetics); Health care; Politics; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robyn Bluhm","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kirstin Borgerson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6201752658057844,"gpt":0.6017771940372039,"spread":0.01839807176858055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05933395,0.000380063,0.001519069,0.001113545,0.0004365151,0.00001093462,0.000619946,0.0006410149,0.00004652415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04645676,0.0002023017,0.0001280407,0.0007722862,0.02221415,0.0002700265,0.0001210405,0.003482137,7.680867e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009809948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004075863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005350125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000181051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931229,0.0008704517,0.002378243,0.0004748613,0.00254102,0.0006125203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609239,0.03066922,0.001110034,0.0007122176,0.005950927,0.0006336602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01894478,0.0004462445,0.0003793504,0.002152537,0.0002848035,0.00002345162,0.01247837,0.000001169712,0.007653757,0.9385972,0.004979839,0.01405847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01449975,0.06509876,0.0001274353,0.0113399,0.0005712786,0.0003961599,0.01081671,0.0004344975,0.000614484,0.8906624,0.005281724,0.0001568626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0105561,0.01335665,0.002519579,0.966853,0.0006549526,0.00174737,0.00002628653,0.00001105483,0.004275009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953392,0.02336779,0.002146172,0.01239026,0.008538743,0.00002966961,0.00002854411,0.00005289265,0.00005388142],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115124278","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.4.343.3011","title":"Feminist Ethics and the Metaphor of AIDS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Bioethics; Dominance (genetics); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Susan Sherwin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1141297465101227,"gpt":0.3768398497822524,"spread":0.2627101032721297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01141836,0.0003240966,0.001175672,0.0003098299,0.0003714583,0.000007232516,0.0003669809,0.0003524125,0.00008583152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001470612,0.0001468743,0.0001725344,0.0003404499,0.01227295,0.0000675672,0.00007311662,0.001442496,4.081298e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006729889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005997032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003606315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002005696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966931,0.0007756036,0.001263319,0.0002242288,0.0007602129,0.0002835772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921435,0.005437574,0.001272244,0.0003787499,0.0005641569,0.0002038147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006973557,0.0001167137,0.00036853,0.0004969102,0.0007710763,0.00001560909,0.03955051,3.630284e-7,0.0003609701,0.9404716,0.001594104,0.009280098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01630186,0.007357805,0.0001380774,0.001198585,0.002010124,0.001073335,0.02252762,0.00002018871,0.0001237304,0.9413959,0.007686601,0.0001661464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05145041,0.1219619,0.001037094,0.7965661,0.001337918,0.0009562364,0.00008788155,0.00001335567,0.02658903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675052,0.01942747,0.0001461591,0.01061987,0.002200076,0.000008855273,0.000008927722,0.00002718041,0.00005627059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9160548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367856496","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhad019","title":"Evidence-based Medicine and Mechanistic Evidence: The Case of the Failed Rollout of Efavirenz in Zimbabwe","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Evidence-based medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Psychological intervention; Efavirenz; Positive economics; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Antiretroviral therapy; Law; Economics; Psychiatry; Family medicine; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Park","is_ca":true},{"name":"Daniel Steel","is_ca":true},{"name":"Elicia Maine","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7936951828489627,"gpt":0.5305091262581133,"spread":0.2631860565908494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1382145,0.0004574962,0.004087633,0.0009526646,0.0003331428,0.00002293987,0.001560286,0.0002151613,0.0001725459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06637534,0.0001431509,0.0005697207,0.002322468,0.007026221,0.0001955572,0.0002246836,0.0007736455,0.000001049896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000167127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001744259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001189596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823047,0.004847571,0.008092318,0.0004725776,0.003963711,0.0003191373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479944,0.04037429,0.0079272,0.001569255,0.001903721,0.0002311523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006370095,0.0003639686,0.02391446,0.01223388,0.002638285,0.0003022973,0.05980751,0.000376661,0.009266522,0.7832383,0.04807188,0.05341614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004270853,0.004764498,0.001013181,0.01720116,0.00240971,0.0004954544,0.01036407,0.004473348,0.0001655327,0.9538608,0.0008079351,0.000173435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1255741,0.0763597,0.0008340543,0.7946452,0.0006252784,0.001535545,0.00004220865,0.000003141858,0.0003807976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854508,0.01077433,0.0001175182,0.002826148,0.0007588437,0.00001193986,0.000001835871,0.00001805446,0.00004054087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8598767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082973924","doi":"10.1076/jmep.28.4.427.15966","title":"Subjectivity and Values in Medicine: The Case of Canguilhem","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophical methodology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Peter Trnka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.128814650244488,"gpt":0.3581878619908527,"spread":0.2293732117463647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005874708,0.0002756895,0.000893786,0.0003016529,0.0004406521,0.000005175836,0.0001917763,0.0001221395,0.0000778239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005551702,0.0001257616,0.00006779717,0.0001402283,0.009444784,0.00009815748,0.00003396372,0.0006572057,8.147386e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001286847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008394229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003674882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001433432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976631,0.0003685019,0.001119198,0.0001721056,0.0004079748,0.0002691537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962684,0.002060522,0.000882195,0.000248939,0.0003196252,0.00022032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008558491,0.00007782553,0.0007281374,0.00132036,0.0001070859,0.00002675659,0.05103952,5.338148e-7,0.0000505029,0.9407203,0.002611902,0.002461185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005816894,0.006759461,0.00009644488,0.002126404,0.0003725626,0.001326127,0.03350031,0.00002793932,0.00004928243,0.9424254,0.007365351,0.000133832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2538169,0.1010563,0.00003877331,0.6195465,0.001756002,0.0009461744,0.00008714764,0.000007341464,0.02274483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857592,0.007357303,0.00003850173,0.004518154,0.002268692,0.000004450557,0.000003481654,0.00001774731,0.00003244848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7319424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102334346","doi":"10.1076/0360-5310(200010)25:5;1-w;ft569","title":"The Ends of Medical Intervention and the Demarcation of the Normal from the Pathological","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Intervention (counseling); Context (archaeology); Normality; Fallacy; Naturalism; Epistemology; State (computer science); Mainstream; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Computer science; History; Nursing","authors":[{"name":"Abraham Rudnick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08657771627797028,"gpt":0.337217490752925,"spread":0.2506397744749547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007418546,0.000184717,0.0005247647,0.00004907794,0.0007772685,0.00001015447,0.0005551397,0.0001355022,0.0002393161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004112738,0.00005577284,0.0001561889,0.00007939216,0.01355164,0.00006558863,0.00007910928,0.0007226222,1.670596e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005381057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005439826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009301868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002473734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970581,0.0005794543,0.001157325,0.0001143195,0.0009092852,0.0001815381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951746,0.003236267,0.0009680942,0.0002806203,0.0002236289,0.0001168262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003554638,0.00009028513,0.0005180591,0.0003596786,0.000174011,7.608061e-7,0.02546131,6.702631e-7,0.00001483704,0.9381166,0.0028421,0.02886705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007168427,0.003288353,0.000729835,0.002120673,0.0004943188,0.00009195044,0.01032399,0.00015153,0.00002640143,0.9581696,0.01735731,0.00007757889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1178352,0.04518304,0.00002948056,0.8315755,0.00082894,0.000492811,0.00007312885,0.000002857293,0.003979045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724482,0.01849325,0.00001019448,0.006132665,0.002854094,0.000005775515,0.000007615335,0.000009224156,0.00003895259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.854613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105789017","doi":"10.1080/03605310490503579","title":"Collective Moral Imagination: Making Decisions for Persons With Dementia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Dementia; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Elisabeth Gedge","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2254834632578255,"gpt":0.4765568570658505,"spread":0.2510733938080251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0124289,0.0003201843,0.0009200459,0.0003817418,0.001849411,0.000005779395,0.0003805562,0.0003559635,0.00003587534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098231,0.00016876,0.0001022714,0.0004095724,0.007055478,0.0002240237,0.00009438071,0.002875629,4.273772e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009783971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008677062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001164224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005501722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962988,0.0006396054,0.001291103,0.0002571997,0.001077775,0.0004354937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788709,0.01701795,0.001650904,0.0002940418,0.001865265,0.0003009711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00569855,0.0001200232,0.0005878172,0.001023505,0.000600061,0.000009797945,0.02916775,0.00001899326,0.0001146472,0.9552903,0.005368837,0.001999678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01557154,0.00863695,0.0001029189,0.007244507,0.001433259,0.0001433444,0.01734253,0.0001128481,0.00001760946,0.9445928,0.004634565,0.0001670777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001801546,0.01236605,0.03503013,0.9390567,0.0008540995,0.001592328,0.00007610262,0.00001448537,0.009208538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681037,0.003017379,0.006852129,0.01859768,0.003296638,0.00004102561,0.00001238371,0.00004449555,0.00003457234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152662042","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhs057","title":"Human All Too Human Reasoning: Comparing Clinical and Phenomenological Intuition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"European Science Foundation","keywords":"Intuition; Bioethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Hillel D. Braude","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4085742563848706,"gpt":0.5316484665720749,"spread":0.1230742101872043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02207991,0.0003503943,0.00139589,0.0002633366,0.001445398,0.000009003389,0.0004296851,0.0007192996,0.0001345826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006906464,0.0001918833,0.0000989577,0.0001613682,0.01362933,0.0002401691,0.0002716223,0.005997907,0.000001926681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002676866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008501385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004737912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002597332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937598,0.002112639,0.002448277,0.0003182264,0.0008907172,0.0004703121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864982,0.009632,0.002040493,0.0003681004,0.0008888298,0.0005723638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004878369,0.0001257229,0.005878929,0.0009778981,0.0002631458,0.000005677039,0.007068537,4.1706e-7,0.0004636082,0.9724169,0.01083438,0.001476891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00815704,0.008080033,0.001531718,0.003308783,0.0005867573,0.00009457346,0.008567788,0.0000969951,0.000004551723,0.9652594,0.00412986,0.0001825114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1319421,0.009077329,0.000603927,0.832781,0.0008905169,0.001252743,0.00001040636,0.00002633313,0.02341574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652812,0.006089508,0.0005040905,0.0230505,0.004979517,0.00001767624,0.00001445947,0.00003190527,0.00003109148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8333392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148510017","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhu020","title":"Why the Debate over Minimal Risk Needs to be Reconsidered","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Referent; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Relative risk; Philosophy; Mathematics; Confidence interval; Statistics","authors":[{"name":"Ariella Binik","is_ca":false},{"name":"Charles Weijer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3607169637700872,"gpt":0.4750319989977756,"spread":0.1143150352276884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02365509,0.0004248646,0.001451426,0.0005950545,0.0004979477,0.00001456228,0.0006269864,0.0005281649,0.00008052804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02455638,0.0001954724,0.0002508702,0.0006076931,0.009725998,0.00008901217,0.0002174459,0.003360958,9.874253e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002783867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002216222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004608262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001324157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947543,0.0006191126,0.001840173,0.0003259731,0.00194891,0.0005115815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701841,0.02568195,0.001175588,0.0007718785,0.001446582,0.0007399328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01511772,0.0003238338,0.003290232,0.002499643,0.001394376,0.00002607528,0.01909275,0.00000986036,0.002255653,0.8560651,0.08475398,0.01517077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00998937,0.02189927,0.0003880468,0.003443309,0.001315164,0.0004844051,0.003179355,0.0002185798,0.0002564035,0.9159074,0.0427144,0.000204325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04226682,0.008125085,0.0007921152,0.9431726,0.0005862385,0.0008944039,0.00004434615,0.00001230639,0.004106083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8779854,0.01259124,0.0006689074,0.1039651,0.004646489,0.0000103417,0.000007199752,0.00005163361,0.00007359732],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8392075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967037242","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.4.417.3009","title":"Shifting the Autonomy Debate to Theory as Ideology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Autonomy; Ideology; Criticism; Feminism; Sociology; Epistemology; Nothing; Ideal (ethics); Critical theory; Law; Philosophy; Gender studies; Politics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Carolyn Ells","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1198574349454127,"gpt":0.3925853119336358,"spread":0.2727278769882232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01507231,0.0003163974,0.0008265213,0.0002902598,0.001088251,0.00001583441,0.0007673777,0.0003452375,0.00006971521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005555778,0.0001589219,0.0001469166,0.0004789272,0.01585695,0.0001694295,0.0001368646,0.001204231,0.000002229603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004128482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003364351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001051219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001056612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962289,0.0009184153,0.001098303,0.000239615,0.0009314431,0.0005833411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901113,0.007610067,0.0007082107,0.0003384679,0.000668654,0.0005632829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009603497,0.00003737383,0.000153919,0.0001019862,0.0001388675,0.00001099224,0.03529055,0.000003668516,0.00005935963,0.9579992,0.000774106,0.00446967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001975157,0.003364136,0.00005543212,0.0008142526,0.0003884351,0.0001899259,0.009411156,0.00001592163,0.00002757471,0.9301785,0.05341548,0.0001640799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01008918,0.008908409,0.0009889536,0.9367627,0.0007113332,0.0005590036,0.00001263505,0.0000160424,0.04195178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395713,0.005464562,0.0001410515,0.04850151,0.006204432,0.000007718259,0.000002527784,0.0000239712,0.000082987],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998798653","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhz029","title":"Ethical Issues in Physician Billing Under Fee-For-Service Plans","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Taboo; Solidarity; Order (exchange); Dimension (graph theory); Public relations; Service (business); Medical ethics; Professional responsibility; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Business; Law; Political science; Politics; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Joseph Heath","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1851712729543774,"gpt":0.4628295232928429,"spread":0.2776582503384655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01103979,0.0003314661,0.001362913,0.0003242535,0.0003733332,0.000003999819,0.0003953201,0.0006922128,0.00007082146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002385565,0.0001776176,0.0001073328,0.000366679,0.002398393,0.0001491538,0.00009268523,0.002861764,0.000002804269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002964892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001995137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007186224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001395937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960236,0.0007042591,0.001683524,0.000278632,0.0008226778,0.0004873212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856149,0.01170656,0.001190522,0.0003659107,0.0008190225,0.0003030959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004486887,0.0001653681,0.003827494,0.006393817,0.0002462194,0.000003957922,0.02652585,0.00001922888,0.001212845,0.9500475,0.005257912,0.001812928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009618374,0.005488689,0.0003877119,0.007696094,0.0003773096,0.00001968103,0.02513544,0.0002899286,0.00003889718,0.9156954,0.03505496,0.0001975206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06290998,0.007257509,0.0002972882,0.9247424,0.0009144454,0.001251835,0.00004397392,0.00001058299,0.002572004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9185727,0.006026698,0.000295614,0.07035635,0.004644685,0.00001748263,0.00001930062,0.00003424821,0.00003287603],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8556628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946744580","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab041","title":"Reconciling Regulation with Scientific Autonomy in Dual-Use Research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Normative; Dual (grammatical number); Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Censorship; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Risk analysis (engineering); Positive economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Business; Economics; Medicine; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas G. Evans","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael J. Selgelid","is_ca":true},{"name":"Robert Mark Simpson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6377498291168069,"gpt":0.5415566889946979,"spread":0.096193140122109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03362275,0.0002597653,0.001082198,0.0008679174,0.0004215378,0.00002777272,0.0002227338,0.0004418618,0.0000456107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01798479,0.0001422559,0.0001016309,0.001158461,0.01493296,0.0002121596,0.0001576679,0.003582914,4.752947e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008502552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001459796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000171412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001988111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944891,0.0005955079,0.001580223,0.0004276543,0.002435791,0.0004717327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756047,0.01806879,0.0006301,0.0006150234,0.004661626,0.0004197205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01014924,0.000458832,0.008986888,0.004310879,0.0004726437,0.000313091,0.01291825,0.0000238128,0.008930277,0.9442822,0.002066093,0.007087846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01058846,0.009476391,0.001197324,0.01186579,0.000305117,0.001021463,0.003731153,0.000265588,0.001097263,0.9565364,0.003768261,0.0001468253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1648358,0.01468134,0.0002787922,0.8162993,0.000398768,0.0007900987,0.00001772989,0.000008280231,0.002689914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862761,0.007620245,0.001464519,0.002547831,0.001756976,0.000007854473,0.00002221978,0.00003546979,0.000268766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8214403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033923131","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhp054","title":"Clinical Research in Context: Reexamining the Distinction between Research and Practice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Clinical Practice; Engineering ethics; Bioethics; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"J. A. Anderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6997599043628012,"gpt":0.6058049002541721,"spread":0.09395500410862911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1195559,0.0002442121,0.001108495,0.000790097,0.0006249472,0.000015102,0.0003692603,0.0004681206,0.00001638382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1329148,0.0001131399,0.00007175314,0.0008344573,0.02315053,0.0001755082,0.0001929797,0.00723633,6.117783e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003835741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001092527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008457385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000120113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922706,0.002053739,0.001776256,0.0003382188,0.002646183,0.0009150143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943759,0.05048984,0.0006194984,0.0004932121,0.002471549,0.002166854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03239814,0.0008883326,0.03917123,0.004835869,0.0006535968,0.0002188026,0.01855838,1.940679e-7,0.00203775,0.433843,0.02901598,0.4383787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01848471,0.04789251,0.007484376,0.007323524,0.0004395706,0.001642684,0.0229544,0.00008203165,0.00005957939,0.8128908,0.08056843,0.0001773628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1163754,0.01070793,0.00007726626,0.867667,0.0003856672,0.00109902,0.00001323361,0.000005028679,0.003669473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639046,0.01993407,0.0002298223,0.008903943,0.006956512,0.0000116371,0.000008193819,0.00002785884,0.00002333823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8587631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018307866","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jht056","title":"The Hippocratic Thorn in Bioethics' Hide: Cults, Sects, and Strangeness","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hippocratic Oath; Bioethics; Strangeness; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Traditional medicine; Law; Medicine; Political science; Physics; Particle physics","authors":[{"name":"Tom Koch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.183002663332198,"gpt":0.4620802150048725,"spread":0.2790775516726745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02641137,0.0004040808,0.001096469,0.0003160371,0.001596342,0.00001377096,0.0005690508,0.0007089949,0.00005725702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01171246,0.0001899956,0.00008186957,0.0004069655,0.01585287,0.0002710141,0.0001892882,0.006395249,0.000001767148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003933734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003062539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001503239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000342655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932632,0.002551378,0.002089807,0.0002975823,0.001203146,0.0005948564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.964525,0.0318178,0.001628271,0.0004520701,0.001129985,0.0004468112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001586587,0.0001038616,0.002815218,0.003462219,0.0003100018,0.00001346195,0.02409339,0.000002028333,0.0006609837,0.9458445,0.009180074,0.01192771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006265209,0.003154387,0.0005641498,0.004833722,0.0003918327,0.0001134972,0.02864783,0.0001997635,0.00002725579,0.9510324,0.004582166,0.0001877697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02365577,0.04370391,0.0003309031,0.9261416,0.001188524,0.001450542,0.00002119187,0.00001218282,0.003495391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196714,0.05895452,0.0003073254,0.01794462,0.002993108,0.00003628678,0.000006682502,0.00004123164,0.00004486958],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.908197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092623743","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.3.319.2984","title":"Human Cloning: Three Mistakes and an Alternative","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Reproductive Biology and Fertility","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Framing (construction); Human cloning; Cloning (programming); Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Human enhancement; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Risk analysis (engineering); Law and economics; Computer science; Business; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Fran�oise Baylis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1989171554816026,"gpt":0.3801533712915784,"spread":0.1812362158099758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003205936,0.0003328169,0.001075826,0.0002649479,0.0003606825,0.000005059719,0.0002088189,0.0002488427,0.00004547602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007730657,0.0001746893,0.00009613683,0.0001615487,0.009714251,0.000141183,0.0000448825,0.0008350326,1.970994e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001442904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000262908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001283369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001544498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977875,0.0001893066,0.0009413032,0.0003306514,0.0004819293,0.0002692996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997248,0.000606058,0.0007730215,0.0003951983,0.0006195112,0.0003582257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02785287,0.001465733,0.03202623,0.00429304,0.002959209,0.0001332285,0.0430146,0.000004128573,0.03053692,0.810476,0.008472618,0.03876544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01084388,0.02725249,0.006623106,0.001726993,0.001149489,0.001068571,0.002218438,0.0002263328,0.0005742892,0.9457805,0.002310299,0.0002255861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3455409,0.05858478,0.0002976317,0.5899365,0.00042831,0.0008075776,0.00003349624,0.00001572737,0.004355044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882877,0.004217918,0.000227939,0.003514304,0.003685508,0.000004120622,0.00000980719,0.00002340446,0.00002933295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6427467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001641223","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhz040","title":"Transhumanism, Moral Perfection, and Those 76 Trombones","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transhumanism; Humanism; Sociology; Human enhancement; Epistemology; Dystopia; Environmental ethics; The Imaginary; Ideology; Ethos; Posthuman; Technoscience; Futurist; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Political science; Politics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Tom Koch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1796080317342715,"gpt":0.366423868914119,"spread":0.1868158371798475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002889542,0.0003340717,0.0008375346,0.0004416041,0.0003982053,0.00001374433,0.0003462241,0.0002064696,0.00007187689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001087238,0.0001937187,0.00008844466,0.0003894301,0.008973972,0.0002169382,0.0000775664,0.001055968,8.52378e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001370915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006455548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004474794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005302935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970975,0.00026253,0.0011138,0.0003380223,0.0008750993,0.0003130579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959493,0.002243857,0.0008713771,0.000305057,0.000386926,0.0002435261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001052304,0.0001496324,0.0003040262,0.001066417,0.00009518186,0.000008467896,0.006731894,0.000002786557,0.09637804,0.8896253,0.001476231,0.003109772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006988474,0.01025395,0.0001524424,0.001660768,0.0003013949,0.0003641454,0.001273942,0.0001685234,0.005683223,0.969799,0.003133748,0.0002204288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2089772,0.007300574,0.001108866,0.7771043,0.001488747,0.00106673,0.00006415753,0.00002716114,0.002862307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762189,0.009711768,0.0001048586,0.0123437,0.001527641,0.000005896262,0.000004294038,0.0000315579,0.00005137948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7672417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061815728","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr034","title":"Questions in Contemporary Medicine and the Philosophy of Charles Taylor: An Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Epistemology; Theme (computing); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Franco A. Carnevale","is_ca":true},{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.202266370524429,"gpt":0.3763780784174485,"spread":0.1741117078930195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00841456,0.0003286594,0.001248127,0.0003219189,0.0006778099,0.000006438708,0.000424853,0.0002402742,0.00003292969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002378946,0.0001532665,0.0001024079,0.0004128022,0.02883424,0.0003330113,0.00008883802,0.000772371,1.190482e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003195897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008019626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007127458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004309521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964023,0.0008002949,0.001361053,0.0002579962,0.0008839698,0.0002944056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955288,0.001799955,0.00134362,0.0002669966,0.0008008562,0.0002597355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002274472,0.0001082836,0.001103513,0.0003389964,0.000220385,0.000003345662,0.1225384,7.100531e-7,0.0002302861,0.8696771,0.001367748,0.002136839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009451447,0.004797872,0.0006957371,0.001474925,0.0004923175,0.00004649561,0.04105244,0.0000341339,0.00004708914,0.9371348,0.00459019,0.0001825313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02663137,0.04661547,0.00007704997,0.9194265,0.0006725609,0.0009207494,0.00002608985,0.00001252163,0.005617708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966969,0.02496919,0.0001508693,0.002438975,0.005423209,0.00001157929,0.000007466396,0.00001815664,0.00001163057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9403375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070274352","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.5.523.10321","title":"Conflicting Interests, Social Justice and Proxy Consent to Research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Ignorance; Mandate; Research ethics; Normative; Institutional review board; Law; Economic Justice; Proxy (statistics); Political science; Clinical equipoise; Veil of ignorance; Public relations; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Clinical trial; Medicine; Alternative medicine","authors":[{"name":"Daryl Pullman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7009016491116048,"gpt":0.5976475664850377,"spread":0.1032540826265671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02158161,0.0003169949,0.0012087,0.0006711376,0.0006532657,0.00001611903,0.0003856165,0.0004947255,0.00006532995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02483271,0.0001803868,0.0001128005,0.0005145108,0.01348866,0.00008420177,0.0002949724,0.003845348,0.000001301904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003932655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001783187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001445423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003364158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949266,0.0004798415,0.001550498,0.00036879,0.002128827,0.000545476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741777,0.02158327,0.000608863,0.0003583568,0.002548844,0.0007229303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006291624,0.0003317728,0.0009258171,0.008497991,0.0005633587,0.00007226384,0.02458759,7.044357e-7,0.002842929,0.9222875,0.02132722,0.01227123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0113224,0.02500309,0.0001974587,0.009392156,0.001240963,0.000902827,0.009916194,0.0002654834,0.0002256294,0.9275004,0.01381044,0.0002229652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02787514,0.01647023,0.0001779437,0.946479,0.0003853352,0.001065888,0.00002764013,0.00001022456,0.007508585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562761,0.02292776,0.0004982097,0.01487668,0.005203628,0.00001054856,0.000004260733,0.00004159179,0.0001611874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392282422","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae002","title":"Beyond Conceptual Analysis: Social Objectivity and Conceptual Engineering to Define Disease","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Theoretical definition; Conceptual framework; Naturalism; Disease; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Anne‐Marie Gagné‐Julien","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09479008579706479,"gpt":0.3330123147658371,"spread":0.2382222289687724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001894146,0.0002876926,0.0007946356,0.0004659014,0.000429672,0.00002050115,0.0001580427,0.00009928277,0.00008524664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001653542,0.0001659655,0.0001368842,0.0002164831,0.005159004,0.0001353327,0.00005310857,0.0005522702,4.356637e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001532264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008237646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001700281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006087503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981239,0.0001020306,0.0007719578,0.0002220788,0.0005013118,0.0002786733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979424,0.0009563753,0.0002853243,0.0001330329,0.0002196859,0.0004631966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009698271,0.00003775522,0.0001776932,0.0009130143,0.0005305609,0.000007329872,0.05129357,0.000003974399,0.00004617939,0.9413145,0.003169112,0.001536558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004623157,0.007905334,0.0003250672,0.002265814,0.00402633,0.00006724441,0.0269136,0.0004646576,0.00001528819,0.9152362,0.03777843,0.0003789295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1245093,0.1017935,0.000474741,0.7658994,0.002169336,0.0007335888,0.0004686278,0.00003155418,0.003919957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851145,0.001821056,0.00005443248,0.006219815,0.00670674,0.00000672029,0.00002143456,0.00002235151,0.00003298095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8606052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211001172","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab034","title":"Access-to-Care and Conscience: Conflicting or Coherent?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Medicine; Nursing; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Joel L. Gamble","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nathan Gamble","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1933577781404203,"gpt":0.4551388334796588,"spread":0.2617810553392386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00355803,0.0003348906,0.001220992,0.0003544569,0.0004401577,0.00002259207,0.0002812408,0.0003233127,0.00005427581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003668135,0.0001769133,0.00009813636,0.0005638462,0.004849611,0.000147538,0.0001982947,0.001282227,2.366834e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002556683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004752312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001943903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003496933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969077,0.000199059,0.001223734,0.000332587,0.0009678092,0.0003691278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935735,0.00266199,0.0007287325,0.0003494686,0.001973585,0.0007127333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01500318,0.0004309799,0.02968305,0.02709088,0.001351755,0.0006024045,0.121555,0.000008260273,0.004759309,0.6831228,0.01736182,0.09903052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02869252,0.04496827,0.001399455,0.02020596,0.003374991,0.006113349,0.05668877,0.0001688371,0.001350282,0.733696,0.102585,0.0007565239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04747452,0.08516794,0.0002717689,0.8610626,0.0008033839,0.0008582462,0.00005836464,0.000012929,0.004290181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9353089,0.03389371,0.0008583165,0.02628444,0.003562953,0.000006575689,0.00001494393,0.00003042493,0.00003978208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092322817","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhp016","title":"Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Reproductive Freedom, and Deliberative Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Stanford Law School; University College Dublin; University of Exeter; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Egalitarianism; Normative; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Libertarianism; Deliberation; Harm principle; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Harm; Politics; Philosophy; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Colin Farrelly","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09174335687241228,"gpt":0.3663359980491925,"spread":0.2745926411767803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00235021,0.0003259481,0.001041151,0.0004091021,0.0003123375,0.000005862395,0.0001573977,0.0002298992,0.000006620657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022481,0.0001764985,0.00007577597,0.0002911852,0.005036979,0.0001482028,0.00004557582,0.0007796143,1.444044e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002018567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009608712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007674183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003683655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975889,0.00014609,0.001056391,0.0003670728,0.0005516303,0.0002899315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964809,0.001035264,0.0009495313,0.0003880492,0.0008758162,0.0002704199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01997955,0.0007612071,0.01823827,0.004345159,0.001358646,0.0001214757,0.02350353,0.00001646238,0.007690462,0.6854326,0.01719892,0.2213537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007162225,0.02418218,0.008249371,0.002131855,0.0009585778,0.002045312,0.00205013,0.00004889221,0.00117931,0.9506459,0.001176849,0.000169381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1462429,0.06079829,0.0005257471,0.7903906,0.0002963682,0.001061646,0.00002158193,0.0000204801,0.0006424008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400458,0.04991798,0.001863529,0.005331176,0.002796042,0.000007806891,0.00001028672,0.00001921884,0.000008196352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7938029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586441227","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw039","title":"What Does the Patient Say? Levinas and Medical Ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing ethics; Obligation; Face (sociological concept); Analogy; Medical ethics; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Situational ethics; Military medical ethics; Subject (documents); Applied ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Nursing; Medicine; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Lawrence R. Burns","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.136994691747695,"gpt":0.3698089647717714,"spread":0.2328142730240764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00725572,0.0003937911,0.001095555,0.0002759255,0.0004549477,0.00001377225,0.0003687155,0.000501387,0.0000671105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006095388,0.0001337202,0.0001483808,0.0002273918,0.01129296,0.0002832834,0.0001889336,0.001539297,5.07136e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002137817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002666394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008271704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003173749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958318,0.0004576945,0.001300036,0.0002750517,0.00176815,0.0003672748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893169,0.00785424,0.0009646336,0.0004591983,0.0008355804,0.0005694053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0126518,0.0005408616,0.004024267,0.004747775,0.001667981,0.0001187292,0.05788001,5.069249e-7,0.003033732,0.7219267,0.01164283,0.1817648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01181031,0.01575691,0.0003210508,0.01625203,0.001177655,0.001498315,0.006926696,0.00002734995,0.0005124856,0.9194995,0.02597847,0.0002391887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.058222,0.04435581,0.0003207671,0.8948156,0.0009581508,0.0006315265,0.0000274921,0.00001044052,0.0006582418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8658094,0.1014932,0.00009528988,0.03022928,0.002304517,0.000006476477,0.000005670408,0.00002867841,0.00002741624],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8645863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986756938","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr025","title":"What Is Human in Humans? Responses from Biology, Anthropology, and Philosophy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Technoscience; Humanity; Context (archaeology); Philosophy of science; Environmental ethics; Galileo (satellite navigation); Ideology; Philosophy of biology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Biology; Political science; Geography; Law","authors":[{"name":"G. Bibeau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2190452649296354,"gpt":0.374995550624123,"spread":0.1559502856944875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002886134,0.0004006408,0.001117291,0.0005575489,0.0006210338,0.00002735472,0.0003620991,0.0002548981,0.0004351382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002258459,0.0002341159,0.0001106629,0.0001101061,0.01900848,0.0003834132,0.0001282079,0.000786594,6.31046e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001618499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004842824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002895484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001162307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973754,0.000360089,0.001243509,0.0003243448,0.0003628051,0.0003338128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970844,0.001014264,0.0009133671,0.0003101135,0.0004563506,0.000221449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001564563,0.0001612203,0.003718169,0.0002854803,0.0003006646,0.00001435304,0.06231996,4.232878e-8,0.0006519335,0.927899,0.001510262,0.00157435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005112222,0.007461543,0.000660862,0.001850791,0.0003619454,0.00003120321,0.01196114,0.00000749482,0.0001950655,0.964372,0.007751625,0.0002341328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4096631,0.0603104,0.00002362038,0.5197641,0.001737991,0.0007098076,0.0002558565,0.00001593075,0.007519224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645669,0.02647434,0.00004208466,0.005876636,0.002948682,0.000005822924,0.00001739069,0.00002948004,0.00003864557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5549038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9836612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130179557","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.3.285.3022","title":"Acculturating Human Experimentation: An Empirical Survey in France","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Transactional leadership; Psychology; Aptitude; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Social science; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology; History","authors":[{"name":"Sverine Mathieu","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anne Fagot-Largeault","is_ca":false},{"name":"Philippe Amiel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6591876307650544,"gpt":0.5955553106546103,"spread":0.06363232011044406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01620559,0.0003005736,0.001150787,0.0003761154,0.0002842834,0.000009502483,0.0003706905,0.0004444841,0.00005302086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006847738,0.0001645571,0.0001014205,0.0005136766,0.006442286,0.0001810411,0.00008971045,0.002323984,2.841668e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003031464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001698247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005247138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001991942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956508,0.0005188492,0.001751193,0.0003089796,0.001417969,0.0003522525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890442,0.008013246,0.0008079678,0.0003999335,0.001293202,0.0004413951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01710489,0.001661428,0.4202051,0.004449459,0.0009353264,0.0002756093,0.05367399,0.00001979032,0.01973842,0.4630351,0.00412573,0.01477516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01534877,0.02132278,0.02232573,0.004677124,0.0002596414,0.0005536042,0.004737413,0.000127888,0.0003370524,0.9293168,0.0007724853,0.000220746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3971922,0.0119762,0.0002911513,0.5877441,0.0002836928,0.0006830419,0.00001755135,0.000009666885,0.001802394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786187,0.009293205,0.000525622,0.008985511,0.002465893,0.000007538815,0.00003030269,0.00003018013,0.00004306814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5814265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396871968","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae021","title":"Ethical Problems of Observational Studies and Big Data Compared to Randomized Trials","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta Hospital; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Temptation; Randomized controlled trial; Context (archaeology); Informed consent; Psychology; Medicine; Research ethics; Randomized experiment; Medical physics; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Surgery; Psychiatry; History","authors":[{"name":"Jean Raymond","is_ca":true},{"name":"Robert Fahed","is_ca":true},{"name":"Tim E. Darsaut","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8855603813236204,"gpt":0.6170519194353139,"spread":0.2685084618883065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08838472,0.0003577476,0.003873158,0.0005926874,0.0001796375,0.00001242519,0.0005204208,0.0005843583,0.00001599107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1044202,0.0001691724,0.0002327467,0.0005118776,0.01535927,0.00009805022,0.0004188621,0.00310072,2.256075e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002058763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004535763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009651568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003174972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924024,0.001171192,0.003540413,0.000436707,0.002139266,0.0003100674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9004071,0.09527606,0.001071405,0.0006001704,0.002194452,0.0004507752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06583283,0.0001361479,0.0001947069,0.0171349,0.003385497,0.0000232151,0.00951896,0.000005444437,0.001543846,0.8840068,0.009651606,0.008566079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05301392,0.006677173,0.00004533654,0.02301454,0.002698655,0.0002187474,0.0016519,0.000498125,0.00009829613,0.9091794,0.002767605,0.0001363137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006133919,0.1223132,0.001365641,0.8672083,0.0008201031,0.001574876,0.0001593791,0.00001061871,0.0004139084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8873855,0.09510811,0.001670104,0.01120253,0.00450601,0.00001703592,0.00004379661,0.00003588034,0.00003104446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8812516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146720863","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaa037","title":"Religion at Work in Bioethics and Biopolicy: Christian Bioethicists, Secular Language, Suspicious Orthodoxy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Dignity; Deference; Orthodoxy; Law; Sociology; Secularism; Legislation; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Russell Blackford","is_ca":false},{"name":"Udo Schüklenk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1860090117620325,"gpt":0.4661395546763774,"spread":0.2801305429143449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01969105,0.0005064058,0.00152034,0.0004720858,0.0008523993,0.000007124755,0.0005206094,0.001132222,0.00004216217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01766862,0.0003045787,0.0001178815,0.0008018619,0.0179287,0.0001499931,0.0003778434,0.007470157,0.000002191926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006559585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002600736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00235502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002879072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929318,0.00241104,0.002249064,0.0004515416,0.001328618,0.0006278892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802541,0.01593559,0.001948641,0.0003971818,0.0006843614,0.0007801907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00901757,0.0001313204,0.005839338,0.006902605,0.0003815928,0.0001179803,0.1270891,0.000005000633,0.001234386,0.8257965,0.02120448,0.002280053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01310066,0.007096977,0.0002732621,0.009508439,0.0008578396,0.0002487322,0.04342726,0.0001515406,0.0001086268,0.9127066,0.01207325,0.0004468223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03482857,0.05234599,0.0004165024,0.9089554,0.0005773851,0.0009713743,0.0000486453,0.00002424464,0.001831913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8775424,0.04488191,0.0006945655,0.07295207,0.003817413,0.00001121171,0.00001984606,0.00006128651,0.00001934906],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8427138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560663898","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw031","title":"Narrative Aversion: Challenges for the Illness Narrative Advocate","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Personal narrative; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Kathy Behrendt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1216001969544379,"gpt":0.3678191349692532,"spread":0.2462189380148154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004669876,0.0003419837,0.0009952572,0.0002349971,0.0005472513,0.000003556886,0.0002873712,0.0002583955,0.00004904922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002791635,0.0001269182,0.0001797757,0.0001974241,0.00755414,0.0001380844,0.00005268587,0.0005654096,3.189632e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003094753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002208589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004103899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009178021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975156,0.00018593,0.0009742872,0.0002524916,0.0007521404,0.0003195781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921411,0.005047644,0.0009544691,0.0003279859,0.001154265,0.0003745864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01271576,0.000312524,0.00007108064,0.002240959,0.001237103,0.00001106975,0.5679508,9.670558e-7,0.001722712,0.3030212,0.01385693,0.09685894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01656698,0.01772531,0.0001394465,0.006782878,0.001488324,0.0005176356,0.263676,0.00003824557,0.0008183141,0.6721053,0.01992397,0.0002175546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01977925,0.04939157,0.001114139,0.9268204,0.001056878,0.001106352,0.00002539265,0.000009321118,0.0006967103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347753,0.05273627,0.0001585873,0.007352917,0.004828947,0.00003119452,0.000008393215,0.00002875839,0.00007962743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9194674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588017142","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw066","title":"The Ethical Principles of the Portuguese Psychologists: A Universal Dimension","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Psychological Association","keywords":"Portuguese; Dimension (graph theory); Adaptation (eye); Engineering ethics; Ethical values; Bioethics; Point (geometry); Ethical issues; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Miguel Ricou","is_ca":false},{"name":"Eduardo Marques de Sá","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rui Nunes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1254975883195261,"gpt":0.3846436385845627,"spread":0.2591460502650367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007857801,0.0002490303,0.000620943,0.0001406789,0.0003679565,0.000003875304,0.0005954955,0.0003648341,0.00004298741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001653163,0.00008222769,0.0001621042,0.0002287805,0.008618888,0.00007719971,0.0001217151,0.001061664,4.615858e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001147937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007108074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000158944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002228833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970485,0.0005758023,0.001104729,0.000211755,0.0007906327,0.0002685862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991636,0.005653962,0.001350445,0.0005748189,0.0006269104,0.0001579123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007384201,0.0001453955,0.0005902518,0.0002161032,0.0004701999,0.00001467683,0.00984178,0.000001502584,0.002467402,0.9045716,0.006253953,0.06804295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01088932,0.01041763,0.001429815,0.003662361,0.0008368377,0.0006782609,0.005766702,0.00004048286,0.0001240227,0.902936,0.06301238,0.0002061612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03352134,0.04345822,0.000372787,0.9183748,0.001446692,0.0003976772,0.00002656562,0.000006492769,0.002395364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561296,0.03747927,0.0000600429,0.00492,0.00129301,0.000002618061,0.00000126169,0.00002017809,0.0000940348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9226083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994542369","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr033","title":"Toward a Hermeneutical Conception of Medicine: A Conversation with Charles Taylor","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Library science; History of medicine; Sociology; Bioethics; Classics; Art history; History; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Charles Taylor","is_ca":true},{"name":"Franco A. Carnevale","is_ca":true},{"name":"Daniel Weinstock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.205145896633878,"gpt":0.331308227443038,"spread":0.1261623308091599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002248246,0.0002823666,0.000875374,0.0002721708,0.0002423348,0.000003417465,0.0002216233,0.0001385723,0.0003337813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001256564,0.0001379331,0.00007461088,0.00009629774,0.01197913,0.0001451505,0.00002769631,0.0004685121,4.103048e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001270897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006922399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005632496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007120302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976592,0.0001577737,0.001120043,0.0001713811,0.0006416922,0.0002499165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972277,0.0005563271,0.001182301,0.0001946483,0.0005669403,0.0002721196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005103579,0.0001109127,0.0003681811,0.001848047,0.0002088779,0.00000397674,0.115278,1.86714e-7,0.0001492409,0.8714925,0.001781241,0.003655242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01200819,0.02921452,0.0001191944,0.003795061,0.0008923601,0.0001783112,0.04630804,0.00005167021,0.0001518438,0.9018989,0.005186363,0.0001956155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05373586,0.02506133,0.0004683708,0.8903224,0.002108687,0.001350967,0.0001261341,0.00002042007,0.0268058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858859,0.00406056,0.0001238308,0.005785695,0.004081542,0.000006256193,0.00001679586,0.00002149798,0.00001793288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403596864","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae040","title":"The WEIRD Trio: The Cultural Gap between Physicians, Learners, and Patients in Pluralistic Societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lester Liao","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1907363616623692,"gpt":0.4108723786707293,"spread":0.2201360170083601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002396141,0.0002838442,0.0006363703,0.000108752,0.0004337559,0.00003165468,0.0003337877,0.0001666647,0.0000135081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003026273,0.0001029107,0.0001199593,0.0002417715,0.006163885,0.0001096456,0.00007080067,0.0009359348,4.745723e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001427565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002461629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000394132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003835685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979031,0.0002989117,0.0008013391,0.0001985861,0.0005049996,0.0002930498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962062,0.002829918,0.00043905,0.0001906496,0.0002278512,0.0001062804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001529871,0.00008621767,0.007162396,0.000918231,0.0009462693,0.000008913202,0.07501955,0.00000127424,0.0001469527,0.8125314,0.05384544,0.04780351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004123864,0.004973013,0.008106632,0.002488258,0.0007215784,0.00005728129,0.02728154,0.00006650785,0.000008676993,0.9406081,0.01138032,0.0001842214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2360767,0.07826333,0.00001661802,0.6830044,0.0009379648,0.0004728471,0.00007002668,0.00000936353,0.001148814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746644,0.02009469,0.000009526,0.002532271,0.00255525,0.00000701333,0.00001670471,0.00001764078,0.0001024802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7385877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172249225","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab007","title":"The Most Good You Can Do with Your Kidneys: Effective Altruism and the Organ-Shortage Problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Economic shortage; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Tonkens","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03308947230173553,"gpt":0.3035110699703742,"spread":0.2704215976686387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003591008,0.0003248436,0.0008574403,0.0001608513,0.0005922073,0.0000204294,0.0001830536,0.0001653538,0.00001528603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006576807,0.0001257829,0.00008548248,0.0004024006,0.006295301,0.00008305717,0.00004261082,0.0009073751,1.508247e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001860908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002153477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001056748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005322894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997541,0.0003043392,0.0008271793,0.0002326862,0.0008295652,0.0002651911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954626,0.002304692,0.000704085,0.0003070632,0.0009287946,0.0002927622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01410811,0.00020439,0.003592405,0.002247301,0.002032303,0.00010057,0.03078366,0.000003308028,0.001998415,0.9258733,0.001789112,0.01726718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05801208,0.01376154,0.001851576,0.006357402,0.005129176,0.005112568,0.0156229,0.0001130698,0.002292103,0.8814539,0.009940066,0.0003536045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02119395,0.03507984,0.000356388,0.9386602,0.0002865591,0.001294428,0.0000581233,0.00001081796,0.003059688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621384,0.02691056,0.0001703457,0.009167676,0.00147727,0.0000145152,0.00002948942,0.00003487347,0.00005692819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9409444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163932426","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jht045","title":"Rethinking Voluntary Euthanasia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Perspective (graphical); Morality; Health care; Personal autonomy; Sociology; Philosophical methodology; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Byron J. Stoyles","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sorin Costreie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.244207997732426,"gpt":0.4615473046845997,"spread":0.2173393069521737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02163751,0.0003933197,0.001228687,0.00039431,0.001345201,0.000005652227,0.0006279561,0.0006990609,0.0003012299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01140492,0.0002094931,0.0001230964,0.00035027,0.01013324,0.0003295661,0.000212174,0.006436887,0.000005037514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004015855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002433093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001350714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004988292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937806,0.001849709,0.002140288,0.0002776164,0.00140016,0.0005516433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748405,0.0202696,0.002228169,0.0004825808,0.00165123,0.000527984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001285782,0.00007423184,0.001882616,0.002938472,0.0004306344,0.00001233331,0.04051419,0.000001244093,0.0007833113,0.903842,0.0411358,0.007099398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00576467,0.004303684,0.0002608065,0.006009215,0.0006410389,0.0001497105,0.01365763,0.0001188788,0.00002275206,0.958789,0.01009475,0.000187911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01199206,0.01873798,0.0009483595,0.9509181,0.001717888,0.001160322,0.00001967833,0.00002010703,0.01448548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297028,0.01345631,0.001057924,0.04686799,0.008766627,0.00002059323,0.00001179647,0.00005082056,0.00006515856],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167210268","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhn025","title":"Public Health Insurance under a Nonbenevolent State","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Public health; State (computer science); Library science; Philosophy of medicine; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Nursing; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Pierre Lemieux","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3327493158140065,"gpt":0.3501457519442527,"spread":0.01739643613024622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005571997,0.000270859,0.001128739,0.0005325059,0.0003929992,0.000006189942,0.0003235931,0.0001236979,0.00001985412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004333885,0.0001769451,0.0001118416,0.0003212787,0.003325264,0.0001673834,0.00007622879,0.0005585211,0.000001310172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000455497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000122246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001527435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005357634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972358,0.000118685,0.001718066,0.0002412574,0.0002559758,0.0004301551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996724,0.0005471933,0.001724317,0.0003155665,0.0002700463,0.0004188896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002740435,0.00009631784,0.001653399,0.0007206296,0.0002051256,0.000004563465,0.006632825,0.000008845613,0.000007114287,0.9829201,0.003331233,0.004145869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004523471,0.004896403,0.001632388,0.0006430901,0.00002469038,0.0001746311,0.0006838412,0.00009356531,0.000005866206,0.9535922,0.03356463,0.0001652251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01398848,0.05078663,0.004123767,0.9276,0.0005187881,0.0004703933,0.0001382285,0.00000894239,0.002364743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099342,0.06199397,0.0002450284,0.02655755,0.001201406,0.000006042191,0.000007887392,0.00002443597,0.00002946519],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9010425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156828052","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr050","title":"The Medical Minimum: Zero","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Health Services Management and Policy","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Forcing (mathematics); Zero (linguistics); Government (linguistics); Health care; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jan Narveson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2579254371691364,"gpt":0.4582681134972947,"spread":0.2003426763281584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01333153,0.0003180226,0.0008998309,0.0002705101,0.001316067,0.000003212224,0.000749748,0.0003945862,0.0001633311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001546796,0.0001394187,0.0001077877,0.0003142866,0.005678243,0.0001140308,0.000199157,0.001649399,0.000002949389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001921941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002672967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008910489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001409514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954877,0.0007199521,0.001928689,0.0001894514,0.001092199,0.000581989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912464,0.005463899,0.001618275,0.0004235595,0.0006639682,0.0005839159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002648284,0.00007350509,0.001228236,0.002325012,0.0003020591,0.00001206201,0.02755399,1.087921e-7,0.0000226156,0.9166788,0.03850911,0.01064623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006377699,0.004870082,0.0003249137,0.003384788,0.000416523,0.00006360362,0.007491163,0.00007487102,0.000006304556,0.8931581,0.08369101,0.00014089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007313508,0.02076659,0.000348671,0.9399416,0.001746017,0.001002581,0.00001985415,0.00001534339,0.02884581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055369,0.03851952,0.0001296668,0.04925678,0.006356532,0.00001883711,0.000007143756,0.00003794226,0.0001366049],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8982235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}