{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":10,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"82da12ce13f5","filters":{"venue":"The Library Quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2157964620","doi":"10.1086/512953","title":"Producing Storytime: A Collectivist Analysis of Work in a Complex Communicative Space","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Work (physics); Sociology; Collectivism; Public space; Value (mathematics); Everyday life; Public relations; Order (exchange); Literacy; Social space; Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Individualism; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03667349688414132,"gpt":0.3101331277364768,"spread":0.2734596308523355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001130144,0.00007602844,0.0001977078,0.0002615867,0.0003405427,0.0000978479,0.0006294047,0.00003804831,0.0002825093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002694195,0.00005848913,0.0000764351,0.005176594,0.0005266599,0.001335805,0.00002510465,0.0001289639,0.000007753752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002290856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002062671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009517361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002581278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986409,0.0004314414,0.0002522564,0.0001723754,0.0002555339,0.0002474822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988997,0.0004764493,0.0001618115,0.0003830041,0.00001568443,0.00006335574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002460477,0.0002711838,0.1817801,0.000007087418,0.0001706914,0.000006853053,0.7642308,0.00005467304,0.0004849306,0.03865729,0.006640887,0.007449479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001610617,0.000202279,0.9261019,0.00002230538,0.00005676573,1.78106e-7,0.06073831,0.0001989328,0.0002037667,0.002572623,0.009600225,0.0001416511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9383564,0.00006464572,0.0001406984,0.009745491,0.00003946364,0.0003057258,0.000005900451,0.00005344985,0.05128825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959728,0.000005503866,0.0008716853,0.0002320709,0.00005036602,0.00000484462,0.00001474815,0.000005134185,0.002842837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7443218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3093279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151197517","doi":"10.1086/660134","title":"What Do Young Teens Think about the Public Library?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Qualitative research; Public relations; Qualitative property; Web site; Web survey; Library science; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Business; Marketing; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03975147041104943,"gpt":0.2569396112231474,"spread":0.217188140812098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005051234,0.0001769383,0.0001369928,0.00006555179,0.001582077,0.004077931,0.002075575,0.0001105464,0.005565404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000152909,0.00009591597,0.0001294283,0.0007874456,0.0009120196,0.03783282,0.00007433576,0.0002698245,0.0006088532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005466874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004402004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001017095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008580968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997741,0.0005936262,0.0002885523,0.0003158375,0.0004915159,0.0005694991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987805,0.0001915692,0.0001508501,0.0006544339,0.00001302482,0.0002096373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001962083,0.00006638887,0.009837558,0.000003576498,0.00001845072,0.00001401305,0.2361227,5.534998e-8,0.00001549263,0.6682099,0.05575811,0.02993417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002087607,0.0004510815,0.03124641,0.00005557191,0.0000211737,0.00001343576,0.2135145,0.00003587981,0.0002823749,0.2299242,0.5238314,0.0004153098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3602493,0.001900031,0.0000262124,0.1398648,0.003229998,0.0007833428,0.00001608215,0.000879988,0.4930502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648093,0.0006407902,0.0002052243,0.004983993,0.0009919084,0.00002298558,0.00001783993,0.00002646828,0.0283015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041824046","doi":"10.1086/680153","title":"Learning about Diversity: The Roles of LIS Education, LIS Associations, and Lived Experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Socioeconomic status; Ethnic group; Library science; Cultural diversity; Sociology; Psychology; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03741061084671503,"gpt":0.2887955267052419,"spread":0.2513849158585268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004206543,0.00006138835,0.00007830383,0.00003116387,0.001134574,0.0002914905,0.0004761822,0.00004114871,0.00006642034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008940817,0.00003910177,0.00002894881,0.0003149488,0.000425402,0.002898315,0.00006844575,0.00009648997,0.00001270497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008841282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004526922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005249651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000866132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989214,0.0003622906,0.0001379327,0.0001222681,0.0003111309,0.0001449736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993948,0.0001876655,0.0001458599,0.0001382406,0.00003994233,0.0000934343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007772999,0.00003540753,0.1366503,0.000001904241,0.000006673994,2.771534e-7,0.8059294,0.000001697103,0.00002612188,0.02337174,0.006051454,0.02791724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001360801,0.0002962191,0.1129192,0.00002294525,0.00001606576,8.964716e-7,0.7871762,0.00006143419,0.000151688,0.02339445,0.07568379,0.0001410264],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9629608,0.0004288385,0.00000726987,0.01735264,0.0001842874,0.0001486975,0.000003906323,0.00005613285,0.01885742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920968,0.00008000133,0.00007880226,0.0006276719,0.0002216263,0.000007113731,0.00000856945,0.000003743738,0.006875671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06963234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8726338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123266157","doi":"10.1086/382845","title":"The Portrayal of Librarians in Obituaries at the End of the Twentieth Century","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Portrait; Library science; Sociology; Scale (ratio); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Media studies; History; Art history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01075025197167233,"gpt":0.2324436063264451,"spread":0.2216933543547728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005291184,0.0001046431,0.0001229801,0.00002400424,0.0009493753,0.0002126749,0.001381836,0.00006381112,0.0002021831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002272732,0.00004274828,0.0001243267,0.000639666,0.002327138,0.00204242,0.00007727453,0.0001762633,0.00001056321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001239153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007094765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005359993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001187641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983202,0.000403598,0.0003517528,0.0001530489,0.0004704978,0.0003009265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998862,0.000357677,0.0002398304,0.0004859786,0.000009807188,0.00004471647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001156795,0.0001458264,0.02683288,0.00001890336,0.00003031278,0.000004471568,0.1901574,0.00005205989,0.0007591007,0.7636749,0.00537244,0.01283597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000936873,0.0007323799,0.2287743,0.0001441649,0.00004165623,0.000008000443,0.1606877,0.00002278631,0.01238059,0.3532882,0.2426056,0.0003777172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8722343,0.0006481091,0.00000396945,0.09390338,0.0006728069,0.0004333867,0.00002328051,0.00003243842,0.03204827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946581,0.0001481903,0.00002828696,0.0006091742,0.0001535627,0.000008646773,0.000004773498,0.000008130222,0.00438116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4103867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8574435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058387","doi":"10.1086/603196","title":"Controversial Books in the Public Library: A Comparative Survey of Holdings of Gay-Related Children's Picture Books","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Checklist; Divergence (linguistics); Publishing; Library science; Sociology; Queer; Public opinion; History; Representation (politics); Media studies; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Politics; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03204426775008414,"gpt":0.2964000274876546,"spread":0.2643557597375705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004205123,0.0002514794,0.0005248646,0.0001888719,0.0001345138,0.0001107591,0.001110874,0.0002101981,0.003747045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008455019,0.0001608087,0.000153324,0.0005369715,0.0004370494,0.0009469099,0.00002837338,0.0005726675,0.0001478241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000662443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001489645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003210925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001787781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963994,0.001911026,0.000675481,0.0002949815,0.000245782,0.0004733492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998113,0.0006972162,0.0003212253,0.0007547234,0.0000195692,0.00009425648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001731861,0.0008338073,0.3740796,0.0001053921,0.0004693606,0.00002189298,0.09808035,0.000003060317,0.00003582004,0.0999861,0.4185661,0.00608665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002264595,0.0008840583,0.983112,0.00002179465,0.00004827771,0.00002908273,0.001066562,0.00001157296,0.00001619411,0.008931246,0.003415741,0.0001989176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8894042,0.001261173,6.074261e-7,0.006831953,0.0002057889,0.0006618628,0.0003175427,0.00007038432,0.1012464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986001,0.00006426972,0.000007834128,0.001879434,0.0001736122,0.00001825598,0.0001574673,0.00003313364,0.01166501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6090323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206070772","doi":"10.1086/717233","title":"Digital Literacy Training in Canada, Part 2: Defining and Measuring Success","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Literacy; Information literacy; Vocational education; Digital literacy; Public relations; Medical education; Investment (military); Psychology; Pedagogy; Business; Political science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02335991208470621,"gpt":0.2333650343785731,"spread":0.2100051222938669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002838384,0.00006788386,0.00008487736,0.00004305858,0.0007958644,0.0005712479,0.0003548534,0.00001123458,0.0003550122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001155297,0.00005809318,0.00001728429,0.0003733656,0.00008466971,0.004878805,0.00004146023,0.0001562366,0.000002510602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003877904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001724687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09331297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1929934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988636,0.0001872124,0.0001685605,0.000167004,0.0003369469,0.0002766743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995686,0.0001858367,0.00005657757,0.0001007709,0.000003146024,0.00008506709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003283452,0.00002251359,0.2890946,0.000007565432,0.000007509629,0.00008084295,0.2796845,0.00004325422,0.00001622386,0.03489629,0.001397288,0.3947166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005793358,0.0003983636,0.1270958,0.00006992139,0.000007822283,0.0000277154,0.5422459,0.0009147653,0.00004051754,0.02628251,0.3016935,0.0006438478],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477426,0.0001449437,0.000002108035,0.00731896,0.0002378939,0.0001014371,0.00002500238,0.00003775131,0.04438934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974303,0.000004134677,0.00002030224,0.0007079795,0.00009996234,0.00001711967,0.0000146278,0.000006575188,0.00169895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3940727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9127247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203041924","doi":"10.1086/715918","title":"Digital Literacy Training for Canadians, Part 1: “It’s … Just Core Public Works”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital literacy; Public relations; Competition (biology); Literacy; Information literacy; Training (meteorology); Digital divide; Core (optical fiber); Key (lock); Business; Political science; Sociology; Information and Communications Technology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1102674426263783,"gpt":0.2654554107346201,"spread":0.1551879681082419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008362912,0.000162033,0.0001695614,0.00006667883,0.0004566618,0.003470399,0.0002724127,0.00004339985,0.003030047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002877267,0.0001214521,0.0001188325,0.00008137111,0.0001261412,0.004712612,0.00001170777,0.0001498696,0.0001077975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001490989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004262773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006491424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005061662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988906,0.00003955177,0.0002877229,0.000234921,0.000125476,0.0004217432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999025,0.0002948807,0.00008037493,0.0003489353,0.00007013786,0.000180693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001104838,0.00003806473,0.0001127704,0.00002712164,0.00002731583,0.000006069334,0.6287401,9.545109e-8,3.774085e-7,0.02424897,0.1781836,0.1686045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001801723,0.00008156246,0.00009182058,0.00007345677,0.000015202,0.000007349024,0.2875497,0.00005446051,0.000002340566,0.006191919,0.7056102,0.0001417674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7552879,0.001937185,0.00005815434,0.1083629,0.009124152,0.0006312255,0.001030412,0.0003604662,0.1232076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8957983,0.00001240731,0.00008135874,0.006833099,0.006000539,0.00009284789,0.001492272,0.00004311334,0.08964601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5274266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976983194","doi":"10.1086/422776","title":"The Politics of Library Artifacts: The NationalUnion Catalog","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Variety (cybernetics); Union catalog; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; National identity; European union; Regional science; Public administration; Library science; Business; Geography; Cataloging; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01216945131549444,"gpt":0.2676092700976466,"spread":0.2554398187821522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004837295,0.00006589213,0.0000647717,0.00002700813,0.001599547,0.0002922266,0.0005099504,0.00003362947,0.000138609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001985043,0.00003155431,0.00005384499,0.0002668949,0.0004027248,0.002160141,0.00002441636,0.00008132774,0.00007238444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001546391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002537516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003038032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004263037,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988215,0.0002653437,0.0003261353,0.00005636084,0.0003279544,0.000202704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991168,0.0003793333,0.0002014233,0.0002377888,0.0000283274,0.00003637486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006936193,0.000007955787,0.0001293416,0.000003625215,0.00001022747,9.162239e-8,0.06286851,0.000005845383,0.000005846393,0.9285458,0.005131019,0.003284852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002575298,0.0001087681,0.002613319,0.00001618556,0.000008033617,0.000001881206,0.1194231,0.00001315671,0.0004982536,0.3920608,0.4849205,0.00007854038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4916333,0.0005218485,0.000793812,0.2461103,0.001566881,0.001566006,0.0001942861,0.0003037149,0.2573099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937676,0.00003980088,0.00005978715,0.001255945,0.0003900438,0.00002046013,0.00006381665,0.000008815324,0.004393742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.536485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395090214","doi":"10.1086/730464","title":"English as the Scholarly Language: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Implications for Academic Reference and Instruction Librarians","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Political science; English language; Library science; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Social science; Philosophy; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03329748863044509,"gpt":0.3248901587380071,"spread":0.291592670107562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000636388,0.0000845317,0.00006842735,0.00008057692,0.005680617,0.002902367,0.0008901854,0.00009465299,0.00006765555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005367132,0.00005144144,0.00002903119,0.0004237454,0.0004329288,0.04181799,0.003766114,0.0002959652,0.00001379714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009547492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001813695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001442573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005942758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990802,0.0001255009,0.000164406,0.0001781117,0.0002509496,0.0002008574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993031,0.0003432142,0.0000536413,0.0001797308,0.00002451208,0.00009578247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007657912,0.000002313847,0.0005870666,0.00001220783,0.000004380423,1.996234e-7,0.2817042,1.07239e-7,0.00003516351,0.5259023,0.002833575,0.1889108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001574666,0.0001406799,0.008150743,0.00004131371,0.00001683623,0.00000754511,0.03023439,0.0001403077,0.00002682231,0.5367215,0.4242372,0.0001251497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7684631,0.001511591,0.0001033311,0.1780984,0.0004591584,0.0006204766,0.00008729878,0.0003895043,0.05026715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902342,0.0003047703,0.0001291214,0.006857713,0.0004776391,0.00002217974,0.00002943437,0.000007259214,0.001937697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4214036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051898247","doi":"10.1086/651029","title":"<i>Silent Reading and the Birth of the Narrator</i>. By Elspeth  Jajdelska. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. Pp. x+222. $60.00 (cloth). ISBN 978‐0‐8020‐9364‐6.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library Quarterly","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Reading (process); Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Art history; Art; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009029677888687464,"gpt":0.1712250615330873,"spread":0.1621953836443999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002983275,0.0002471883,0.0003298595,0.000005319348,0.0006331861,0.0004364912,0.001038789,0.00007862974,0.005188338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008046809,0.0001353605,0.000189061,0.00001697675,0.001367227,0.002775363,0.0001499053,0.0003144321,0.000007606716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002030528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005682828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01617234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01100918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985951,0.0002116917,0.000333422,0.0002452049,0.0003105337,0.0003041176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985989,0.0002349439,0.0002835958,0.0007452296,0.000054591,0.00008277436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004014041,0.0001419502,0.0002746985,0.00008557254,0.0001370986,0.00000290945,0.1383605,4.799683e-7,0.0002545944,0.6222591,0.2350941,0.002987647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008930311,0.0002709852,0.0005239827,0.00006583366,0.00005704751,0.000004654103,0.04519908,0.00004085833,0.000185476,0.006325291,0.9462014,0.0002323756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4607867,0.01545469,0.000001564057,0.00137496,0.001060494,0.0005993904,0.000558449,0.0001040305,0.5200597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433291,0.0005847307,0.00001485737,0.000442197,0.0004359771,0.000004133386,0.00001313986,0.00003778091,0.0551381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7111073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}