{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":64,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":64,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"341386538542","filters":{"venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics"}},"results":[{"id":"W3122042203","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00107.x","title":"Net neutrality and investment incentives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":257,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University; Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health; Victoria University of Wellington","keywords":"Incentive; Net neutrality; Investment (military); Internet service provider; Neutrality; Welfare; Business; Public economics; The Internet; Economics; Microeconomics; Market economy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01524596940046651,"gpt":0.1866155355328425,"spread":0.171369566132376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005109906,0.0000776926,0.0001580146,0.00003995937,0.0001043789,0.0007728502,0.0001621111,0.00002891945,0.00003986319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002109495,0.00005033259,0.00006184298,0.00002371643,0.0001076803,0.002556851,0.00006931165,0.000153138,0.00001924552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007903074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001733565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003254567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001264248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995258,7.259682e-7,0.0002841132,0.00006115981,0.00001781674,0.0001104259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994782,0.00003232166,0.0003467312,0.00009580277,0.00003030885,0.00001661836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003382582,0.00008893265,0.01989973,0.00005107432,0.0001665765,0.000004704963,0.0002587117,0.0008902311,0.0001646117,0.9523212,0.002466168,0.02334975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002570625,0.00003623813,0.0393891,0.000020348,0.00009432912,0.0000757092,0.0007487829,0.005910794,0.0001038015,0.723326,0.2274211,0.000303199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847451,0.00004458504,0.00000470821,0.0006626257,0.0006197509,0.00005289962,0.000001020211,0.000003603932,0.01386567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973078,0.00005682139,0.00007438315,0.0018208,0.0006953775,4.292318e-7,0.000001068166,0.000007144742,0.00003617147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2289953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7452613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124057883","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00150.x","title":"Consumer search and dynamic price dispersion: an application to gasoline markets","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Price dispersion; Search cost; Dispersion (optics); Economics; Microeconomics; Gasoline; Intersection (aeronautics); Econometrics; Imperfect; Limit price; Perfect information; Key (lock); Panel data; Price level; Monetary economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02645356159041849,"gpt":0.2399030634632747,"spread":0.2134495018728562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001018294,0.00008539708,0.0001517927,0.000125805,0.0001233762,0.00009998937,0.0002072056,0.00002646859,0.0001556951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001797525,0.0000613919,0.00004207964,0.00008069825,0.00004120589,0.0005111835,0.00006543934,0.0001184079,0.00002280685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001600028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001600778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009726492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001064004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994532,0.0000168483,0.0002580746,0.00009928205,0.00004226581,0.0001303553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995254,0.00004886329,0.0001523121,0.0001551615,0.00008803378,0.00003019482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004320991,0.0003027478,0.1843406,0.0001501958,0.0001927171,0.0000177651,0.001943306,0.0002530091,0.002007281,0.004013694,0.0005646109,0.8018931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003545441,0.00008887195,0.9095973,0.00009162974,0.0004985972,0.0002210425,0.001486616,0.03606594,0.0001689909,0.003347826,0.04431741,0.0005702894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956363,0.0001943364,0.0007142074,0.0004932017,0.0001434729,0.0001432763,0.000001123233,0.000006144736,0.002667887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988761,0.0002482376,0.0002267128,0.0004028643,0.0001777809,0.000001805889,0.000001472931,0.00001193355,0.00005310357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8013228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2503489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280508082","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12408","title":"Should platforms be allowed to sell on their own marketplaces?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Imitation; Harm; Dual (grammatical number); Product (mathematics); Business; Mode (computer interface); Dual mode; Economic surplus; Industrial organization; Welfare; Commerce; Computer science; Economics; Market economy; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04775093876851454,"gpt":0.2040514604916893,"spread":0.1563005217231748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001336267,0.0001708158,0.000313116,0.0002034031,0.0003208049,0.0005601301,0.0006091543,0.0000310602,0.0006206561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000325476,0.0001097481,0.0002112154,0.0001051408,0.00002521654,0.001856917,0.0002543994,0.0002992756,0.00009239955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001037099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003363791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001672682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003769816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990235,0.000001759969,0.000510498,0.000132001,0.00007518884,0.0002570424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990641,0.0001123311,0.0005384238,0.0002165805,0.00003664966,0.00003189529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01300346,0.0007149527,0.002869488,0.0001021699,0.001031988,0.00005558547,0.001353103,0.4977431,0.000124404,0.2322716,0.1693956,0.08133449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002567241,0.0002011711,0.0006289296,0.00001998823,0.00005599506,0.00006998826,0.003734783,0.008258237,0.00006204457,0.0755705,0.9084219,0.0004091905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542826,0.0000287706,0.00001527083,0.002323959,0.001002743,0.0001576762,0.00001218397,0.00001152867,0.04216529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860819,0.00003972894,0.00002561798,0.01226693,0.0009144222,0.000005190441,0.000007331289,0.00003060813,0.0006282682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7390263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6795749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130811045","doi":"10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00129.x","title":"Do enhancements to loyalty programs affect demand? The impact of international frequent flyer partnerships on domestic airline demand","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Exploit; Scope (computer science); Loyalty; Business; Affect (linguistics); On demand; Market power; Marketing; Advertising; Economics; Commerce; Market economy; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08367516349794862,"gpt":0.3224944252535275,"spread":0.2388192617555789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003509469,0.0001502433,0.0004320964,0.000222007,0.000105309,0.00008602635,0.0004327314,0.00007052393,0.0003594884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001168207,0.00009094259,0.0003982016,0.0001629553,0.00006069845,0.0001700101,0.00003650976,0.0002501685,0.00005175715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000186369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003326943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002419231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000291663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984406,0.00003700897,0.001097057,0.0001540927,0.00005106515,0.0002202316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980462,0.0002254374,0.001275261,0.0002577982,0.00007996537,0.0001153104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002736866,0.001289704,0.6519859,0.00002618326,0.00500487,0.00002151795,0.002484588,0.2132501,0.00005277789,0.09310586,0.002691792,0.0273499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0185786,0.005981807,0.8068809,0.000479682,0.0006135812,0.0002987963,0.001298355,0.01895035,0.002519357,0.1051416,0.03763251,0.001624521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885662,0.0004708651,0.006052232,0.001171759,0.0004184555,0.0001501272,0.00002854915,0.000002685681,0.003139128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987938,0.0002906823,0.00009808367,0.0001252801,0.0004107097,0.000003714552,0.000006182559,0.00001218149,0.0002592977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1942997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3936146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122741346","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00025.x","title":"Price‐matching guarantees","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Credibility; Incentive; Cartel; Microeconomics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01814902543478709,"gpt":0.1939562085705515,"spread":0.1758071831357644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009778801,0.0000872528,0.0003602454,0.0001623348,0.0001079037,0.00008694796,0.0002729672,0.00003292469,0.0007197502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001557848,0.00006979662,0.0002774785,0.0000884233,0.0000349019,0.0001876829,0.00001941248,0.0001348583,0.0001670066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000421961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001565018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007800396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002984128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988799,0.00001712774,0.0008557188,0.0000936776,0.00001479038,0.0001387485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998925,0.00006974219,0.0007707717,0.0001690228,0.00002991935,0.00003553096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007553084,0.00008597089,0.006100104,0.000009838096,0.0002119463,0.000004699405,0.00034989,0.01570805,0.00003315361,0.9744436,0.002190348,0.0007868308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001897702,0.00005594209,0.008601401,0.00001761902,0.00004083665,0.0001068365,0.0002393651,0.002927443,0.0001445267,0.8749757,0.1107486,0.0002439458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9302371,0.003135805,0.008582824,0.001852933,0.0005080657,0.00004194286,0.00001472068,0.000005896356,0.05562071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971068,0.0008629341,0.0003499551,0.0002637689,0.000490404,8.40293e-7,0.000001495936,0.0000105413,0.0009132481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1085583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.788076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388179902","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12453","title":"Data‐enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Competition (biology); Competitive advantage; Competitive learning; Affect (linguistics); Business; Industrial organization; Computer science; Microeconomics; Deep learning; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02020660228880237,"gpt":0.2085022547164733,"spread":0.188295652427671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001268381,0.0001019413,0.0002545928,0.00008043186,0.0001629508,0.0005648544,0.0003218434,0.00002908227,0.00002627798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008711284,0.00007089391,0.00005303878,0.00008731342,0.00005047876,0.00293793,0.0002950167,0.0001708137,0.0001367409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001212957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001394548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006719168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003789449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993605,0.000003188927,0.0003035679,0.0001047701,0.00002658043,0.0002013772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991414,0.0002457645,0.0004145343,0.0001531142,0.0000293069,0.00001587675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001228563,0.00009212258,0.04288956,0.0005252302,0.0009514107,0.0001164524,0.0002452827,0.08902819,0.0000207671,0.7444096,0.04809444,0.07239845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003750686,0.00007429422,0.006915875,0.0001517943,0.0002037432,0.00006897976,0.00302744,0.0777723,0.000006236818,0.1764757,0.7311438,0.0004091481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778013,0.0002051667,0.00005180481,0.0003042559,0.0006052816,0.00008884366,0.000003461877,0.00001868375,0.02092124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995545,0.001139039,0.00005307114,0.0006834957,0.002173542,8.258449e-7,0.00003463911,0.0000228416,0.0003475071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6830494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5446904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189367474","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12168","title":"Pass‐through in a concentrated industry: empirical evidence and regulatory implications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Economics; Econometric model; Econometrics; Econometric analysis; Environmental regulation; Downstream (manufacturing); Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Public economics; Accounting; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4312506899188226,"gpt":0.3577739987874289,"spread":0.07347669113139377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218371,0.0001268523,0.0004681418,0.00008592223,0.0002790185,0.0002421855,0.0005064491,0.0001771162,0.00007571295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003235169,0.0001163438,0.00009604416,0.00003851276,0.0002593671,0.0008316988,0.000101003,0.0004148535,0.00002524475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001528745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005718363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001623238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000197729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986463,0.00002128758,0.0008909379,0.0001877792,0.000009180261,0.0002445323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978465,0.0002046884,0.001339796,0.0004869894,0.00002810251,0.00009391597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001796885,0.00008080182,0.8164211,0.00002414833,0.0001087655,0.000004707805,0.00276552,0.0004176204,0.00001183116,0.1774276,0.001296338,0.001261813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002172801,0.00008158616,0.7492925,0.00009649367,0.00002030486,0.0001245337,0.0003447722,0.001804576,0.00004764869,0.2330553,0.01269271,0.0002667841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754162,0.002373934,0.00003967274,0.01925909,0.000302088,0.0001171522,0.00005530324,0.000003124724,0.002433411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906635,0.008107471,0.0001134838,0.0007448261,0.0002756589,0.000004926749,9.085505e-7,0.00001457741,0.00007459385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0671286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4744361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478383888","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12136","title":"Diversification of geographic risk in retail bank networks: evidence from bank expansion after the Riegle‐Neal Act","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Limiting; Counterfactual conditional; Business; Value at risk; Economics; Risk management; Finance; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02614271892609761,"gpt":0.2075644457574295,"spread":0.1814217268313319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003365885,0.0001364594,0.00041702,0.0001871832,0.0001164465,0.00005024658,0.0005640222,0.0001004724,0.0002599623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003522655,0.00008246255,0.0002345525,0.0001783767,0.0002522008,0.0005414456,0.00006752316,0.000217522,0.00001599782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001343805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000404029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003177075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002360727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981999,0.0001337802,0.001192027,0.000230397,0.00004118826,0.000202679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966171,0.001002715,0.00171665,0.0005440664,0.00007742348,0.00004203844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005014932,0.00004935145,0.9814671,0.000004989942,0.00005677724,3.989533e-7,0.0008684104,0.00694974,0.00001471776,0.00116882,0.00002261979,0.008895548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001038656,0.00006988306,0.9565818,0.0001168571,0.00003262672,0.000003790715,0.0000575982,0.008332597,0.00004195849,0.03317417,0.000428592,0.0001214209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872058,0.006435673,0.004308701,0.001268706,0.0004667016,0.0001771462,0.00005032043,0.000003685091,0.00008327949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989076,0.01054078,0.0001262431,0.00003512586,0.0001838083,0.000004129581,9.621385e-7,0.00001287188,0.00002004588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03200535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3362725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230617245","doi":"10.1111/j.0741-6261.2007.00108.x","title":"Making a difference","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Free riding; Economics; Public good; Wage; Compensation (psychology); Microeconomics; Labour economics; Private good; Outcome (game theory); Incentive compatibility; Set (abstract data type)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.105520015050134,"gpt":0.3710154389640438,"spread":0.2654954239139098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001670437,0.00005430211,0.0001516974,0.00003977007,0.0003155956,0.00005424026,0.0002724354,0.00002942033,0.00003939554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003981949,0.00003908926,0.00008621234,0.00003139026,0.0002114402,0.0001202093,0.00003517675,0.0001106943,0.000009450203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000161781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006050742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008284226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001010704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993989,0.00003260803,0.0003105671,0.00004793933,0.00003597548,0.000174029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993719,0.0001806775,0.0002929626,0.00006843646,0.00003610311,0.00004989629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001271359,0.0003086388,0.1269648,0.00001093107,0.0003915799,0.00004887045,0.1777769,0.0003540338,0.002357472,0.5246544,0.001278695,0.1645823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01041242,0.00106077,0.1524619,0.0003175414,0.0004641994,0.0003294408,0.2871387,0.0002050414,0.01367663,0.2812323,0.2507888,0.001912214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968133,0.0005476897,0.0001045732,0.000965653,0.0005509462,0.00005399009,7.830128e-7,0.000003567749,0.02963981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983031,0.0005897376,0.0003040775,0.0001867946,0.0003717457,3.614742e-7,4.094453e-8,0.000004819191,0.0002393739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2495101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2427338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981712407","doi":"10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00028.x","title":"Work‐related perks, agency problems, and optimal incentive contracts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Corporate governance; Business; Autonomy; Agency (philosophy); Consumption (sociology); Work (physics); Offset (computer science); Agency cost; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Public economics; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0364354885996242,"gpt":0.1929891447225132,"spread":0.156553656122889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001428884,0.0001812871,0.0008384791,0.0001629391,0.0003028598,0.00009687194,0.0003454947,0.000148463,0.000161337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007865852,0.0001824324,0.000232723,0.00009369913,0.0003657278,0.0005254272,0.00006060846,0.0003292346,0.0001234172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001421051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006029594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001072083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001920798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977318,0.00004166192,0.001624382,0.0002467583,0.00002120725,0.0003341872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976757,0.0001483996,0.001713295,0.0002328888,0.00006053459,0.0001691807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001885634,0.0008655015,0.3420545,0.0001371776,0.003933888,0.0001710428,0.04832818,0.02727306,0.00005042171,0.5565409,0.007339495,0.01142015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02613838,0.001351487,0.2385653,0.0003611892,0.000260381,0.003031947,0.00140138,0.009029903,0.0001898497,0.5336234,0.1834105,0.002636329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726424,0.01024564,0.0002227451,0.0007747319,0.001172373,0.0002636931,0.00003711449,0.000009510343,0.01463181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850809,0.01369633,0.0001468435,0.0001782463,0.0004314233,0.000004052374,0.000002688402,0.00003111523,0.0004284151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.176071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7439376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026482073","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00078.x","title":"Do retail gasoline prices respond asymmetrically to cost shocks? The influence of Edgeworth Cycles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Gasoline; Asymmetry; Econometrics; Information asymmetry; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02482967629124568,"gpt":0.2239364839409612,"spread":0.1991068076497155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002773457,0.0002200437,0.0007602057,0.0003482987,0.0001584474,0.0001701404,0.001147251,0.000113405,0.00006226233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004791485,0.000140352,0.0003248154,0.0003632822,0.00009845468,0.0004483496,0.00008632946,0.0003726942,0.00005480024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009725811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005939418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001355002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003025426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976963,0.00003696552,0.001658602,0.0002470087,0.00004053896,0.0003205992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969001,0.0005191953,0.001758677,0.0004980938,0.0001576878,0.0001662125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008381205,0.001233742,0.08129177,0.00009655362,0.002122162,0.00002762649,0.007043708,0.202462,0.0006950729,0.5955974,0.02502996,0.07601886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003203218,0.001484575,0.73412,0.000118124,0.0001133299,0.0001885317,0.0004186783,0.0004037402,0.0006303387,0.1156013,0.1430161,0.0007021422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770411,0.003996975,0.0001382503,0.008892343,0.0002691958,0.0003055609,0.00005414722,0.000005499266,0.009296976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930146,0.004336756,0.0007230114,0.001296768,0.0003779393,0.000003421193,0.000001596462,0.0000149609,0.0002309849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6528282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5723389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187677462","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12382","title":"Competing data intermediaries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; Downstream (manufacturing); Business; Competition (biology); Monopoly; Economic surplus; Compensation (psychology); Industrial organization; Commerce; Survey data collection; Microeconomics; Economics; Marketing; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05219022535818034,"gpt":0.2134179604728202,"spread":0.1612277351146399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006297489,0.00007290371,0.000196873,0.00004482946,0.00009133128,0.0009746403,0.0005155812,0.00002155012,0.0001149459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001215562,0.00005056565,0.00006858108,0.00004159767,0.00006934546,0.004081436,0.0003714352,0.000118762,0.00007152771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001368252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004403003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006804288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000811988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99939,0.000001093239,0.0003837823,0.00008175666,0.00002394029,0.0001194482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991416,0.00008728534,0.0004230336,0.0002674488,0.00007082931,0.000009750631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009034456,0.0003336756,0.01537968,0.0002918215,0.001156008,0.0001903801,0.0007782787,0.01096157,0.0001175619,0.7106231,0.04529734,0.2139671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003254479,0.00002067878,0.001146152,0.0001408507,0.0002155202,0.0003950536,0.009830021,0.03946782,0.0001433223,0.2494418,0.6954821,0.0004621755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762782,0.0001999871,0.0001207321,0.00142986,0.001009646,0.00002338533,0.000004038062,0.00000465976,0.02092942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959134,0.0001944998,0.0001573993,0.001605204,0.002025995,1.49273e-7,0.00002079928,0.00001115417,0.00007134183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6501848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9398478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122504105","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2007.tb00078.x","title":"Teams versus individual accountability: solving multitask problems through job design","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Agency (philosophy); Accountability; Compensation (psychology); Computer science; Principal–agent problem; Microeconomics; Knowledge management; Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Finance; Corporate governance; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1272933708634818,"gpt":0.3565601196281353,"spread":0.2292667487646536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00511003,0.0001357027,0.0003078067,0.00005176968,0.000665218,0.0001663209,0.000537762,0.00008663983,0.00006419789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001301954,0.0001053863,0.0001558408,0.00006838013,0.0004645484,0.0007260864,0.00009314589,0.0002573665,0.00002005189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002102466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008652669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002857915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986398,0.000115957,0.0006339895,0.0001323717,0.0001066888,0.0003712403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983913,0.0007771963,0.0005046396,0.0001488763,0.00008633532,0.00009167091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007579413,0.001084264,0.08190355,0.00004480768,0.00247261,0.00003471844,0.7630664,0.01739715,0.002088284,0.04906162,0.005249965,0.07001723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03641889,0.003148072,0.01705823,0.0002894967,0.001433662,0.0001294177,0.7082078,0.000350849,0.02215427,0.1020117,0.1059135,0.002884131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866763,0.001065378,0.0003809175,0.000671029,0.001538632,0.0002982787,0.000005688313,0.00001174825,0.009352017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949231,0.001134935,0.003184609,0.0001234902,0.0005564031,0.000003093254,4.314564e-7,0.00001515789,0.00005874427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1006635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5116386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025056668","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12049","title":"Spatial differentiation and price discrimination in the cement industry: evidence from a structural model","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Price discrimination; Economic surplus; Econometrics; Economics; Product differentiation; Mile; Industrial organization; Divestment; Microeconomics; Statistics; Market economy; Geography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04857875278560143,"gpt":0.2309597242851069,"spread":0.1823809714995055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009339909,0.00007036442,0.0002103144,0.00009477366,0.00007208694,0.0000981902,0.000200015,0.00004648351,0.0001009976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007078607,0.00004670852,0.0000662056,0.00004950615,0.00002576618,0.0002310677,0.00002220098,0.0001975802,0.000003774789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000423461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001011661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002046058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002279365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992385,0.00005344075,0.0005065841,0.00009673888,0.00002361389,0.00008115973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991691,0.0001377498,0.0005138874,0.0001327896,0.00001904595,0.00002747192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007432319,0.0001847281,0.3353589,0.00005098032,0.0004689671,0.000001682673,0.02562389,0.1500143,0.00011853,0.460077,0.0004007,0.02695703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000800431,0.00004688908,0.1655126,0.0000247792,0.00003474128,0.000003813259,0.0002721695,0.6821764,0.00002139356,0.1508366,0.0001780632,0.00009206896],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715325,0.0004012547,0.02501082,0.002444609,0.000132498,0.00005632498,0.0000108203,0.000001018778,0.0004101362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988719,0.0005902479,0.0001183994,0.0002348086,0.0001510517,0.000002132162,0.000003230972,0.000004012308,0.00002424888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5321621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1904718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996824651","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12022","title":"Days on market and home sales","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Business; Economics; Commerce; Monetary economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02235719443688235,"gpt":0.1817578104782983,"spread":0.159400616041416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001209534,0.0001479518,0.0004737413,0.0001735024,0.0001230346,0.0002115596,0.0002888239,0.00007548969,0.0006794164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006278195,0.0001210416,0.0001423444,0.00004204599,0.0001063589,0.0003839948,0.00004823067,0.0002116685,0.0003807043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007104192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002037385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002632214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009956778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998798,0.00002232278,0.0007848586,0.0001579141,0.00001130072,0.0002255936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986795,0.0002386364,0.0007001216,0.0002421483,0.00002599197,0.0001136276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001999236,0.0005906677,0.1537041,0.0002096746,0.001602678,0.00002435695,0.004812825,0.004958894,0.00005214319,0.5826581,0.1095358,0.1398516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005673914,0.0005948754,0.09203716,0.00009407879,0.00005014013,0.0003030323,0.0005392426,0.01503635,0.00005927362,0.7189503,0.165766,0.000895721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9211162,0.0007661587,0.00007892231,0.002092961,0.0006964764,0.0001135892,0.00001552208,0.000006002162,0.07511416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922051,0.00598435,0.0002881703,0.000509956,0.0003648737,0.000003098988,0.000001019477,0.00002669408,0.0006166891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1389559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7439133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192433738","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12455","title":"The effect of privacy regulation on the data industry: empirical evidence from GDPR","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"General Data Protection Regulation; Business; Consumer privacy; Externality; Information privacy; Opt-out; Value (mathematics); European union; Internet privacy; Industrial organization; Advertising; Economics; Microeconomics; International trade; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1911164019024165,"gpt":0.3752285570412053,"spread":0.1841121551387888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008018167,0.00006636371,0.0001532891,0.00003261399,0.0006409468,0.0001369651,0.001729751,0.00009665125,0.00003320871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00484338,0.00003039331,0.00006356624,0.0001574744,0.0002363956,0.0004414427,0.0003115418,0.000421678,0.00002027744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005889462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001330563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003892144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003026416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985,0.0007947893,0.0003207404,0.0001004884,0.0001488137,0.000135145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940979,0.004719631,0.0004443829,0.0006559612,0.00003871611,0.00004340707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01198773,0.0001845904,0.1049039,0.00007222129,0.001417886,0.00001379306,0.08135464,0.004962559,0.001070665,0.01932745,0.4297034,0.3450011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005051828,0.001807054,0.2172952,0.0009236943,0.0006073158,0.00002476482,0.01079326,0.02604877,0.007064468,0.3629481,0.3667926,0.000642976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644838,0.0002738856,0.00004528629,0.03417716,0.0005411791,0.0002072788,0.00002549932,0.000007033207,0.0002388798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969251,0.002076634,0.00001298503,0.00007598781,0.0008562175,0.000002015617,0.00000435708,0.000005105811,0.000041589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3443582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5798328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125429127","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00002.x","title":"Rules of proof, courts, and incentives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Imperfect; Civil litigation; Tort; Tort reform; Law and economics; Burden of proof; Civil procedure; Arbitration; Business; Standard of care; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Liability","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0349545227360615,"gpt":0.1987669883141061,"spread":0.1638124655780446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001121553,0.0001097935,0.000712322,0.0001375786,0.0001398445,0.00003337529,0.0002746041,0.00007317319,0.00005827522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005874561,0.0001073918,0.000176186,0.00002637331,0.00039572,0.0003160037,0.00004737103,0.0001356559,0.00002247861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005044504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008714468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001580657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983925,0.00002408721,0.001247035,0.0001434517,0.00001554588,0.0001774197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979609,0.000118249,0.001598147,0.0001911292,0.00004868602,0.00008293376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004463594,0.0002014609,0.09839995,0.00008644793,0.0006554557,0.00001040059,0.005506666,0.0007501711,0.00003178399,0.8896768,0.00173387,0.002500612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005138336,0.0004378761,0.04581344,0.00009043523,0.00005240189,0.0005653832,0.0005191204,0.001578363,0.0008842302,0.9050949,0.03930693,0.0005185414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797843,0.007048359,0.0002467995,0.0004391733,0.0006315801,0.000136422,0.00006370658,0.000002890258,0.01164674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990517,0.008641134,0.0001851072,0.00008946338,0.0003996906,0.000001627964,0.000001124989,0.00001707647,0.0001477883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05258651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.437931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135268548","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12359","title":"Free ad(vice): internet influencers and disclosure regulation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Influencer marketing; Unobservable; Intermediary; Commission; Revenue; Business; The Internet; Advice (programming); Social media; Advertising; Marketing; Economics; Computer science; Accounting; Relationship marketing; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01331165256322402,"gpt":0.1775024297336611,"spread":0.164190777170437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003035506,0.00007777136,0.0001659975,0.00005347211,0.0000550089,0.0006651653,0.0001711015,0.00003182083,0.00008667345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005218471,0.00005474434,0.00007263745,0.00004112006,0.00004197783,0.00291005,0.0001201653,0.00009097862,0.00001461272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002233595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002235826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001287306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001438018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999482,0.000001125336,0.0003217026,0.00007343752,0.00002504407,0.00009671677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993931,0.00003529891,0.0003635575,0.0001310025,0.0000645244,0.00001253283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001890301,0.000241301,0.05508538,0.0004879707,0.001223323,0.00007176221,0.001420866,0.02939985,0.0003743168,0.7032672,0.03244657,0.1740912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005358841,0.00004982978,0.03990878,0.0001854578,0.0002367051,0.0002583051,0.002764949,0.01674054,0.0002746332,0.7870675,0.1466567,0.0004976928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889492,0.0002937416,0.00005640723,0.001130034,0.0003397203,0.00003341353,0.000002137898,0.000003768961,0.009191626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980985,0.0001872582,0.00007674442,0.0008985365,0.0004786533,3.293246e-7,0.000003821165,0.000009475059,0.0002466787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1735935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6414204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090183207","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12083","title":"Screening incentives and privacy protection in financial markets: a theoretical and empirical analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Foreclosure; Business; Consumer privacy; Incentive; Welfare; Consumer welfare; Financial services; Information privacy; Finance; Economics; Internet privacy; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04857736345582691,"gpt":0.2433478164654365,"spread":0.1947704530096095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003109157,0.000121636,0.0005442042,0.0003806711,0.00007458708,0.000132441,0.0001512478,0.00009184263,0.00002884731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003761848,0.0001051906,0.0001131848,0.0001846404,0.0002143406,0.0003302965,0.00008549813,0.0002528604,0.000003114113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008629254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004699382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000271696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004148146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987791,0.00006356446,0.0007675638,0.0001847914,0.00001572505,0.0001893185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990879,0.0001298939,0.0004974202,0.0001350401,0.00002508481,0.0001246843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003495356,0.000184076,0.8299755,0.00003606544,0.0007087579,0.00001603908,0.007427048,0.003346568,0.00000273909,0.1051697,0.0002550742,0.04938297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007306185,0.0003478142,0.3660386,0.00005275329,0.0002191224,0.0001696187,0.0008427111,0.1431819,0.00001893952,0.4663711,0.01488177,0.0005694028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903169,0.0007220811,0.004494864,0.001648134,0.0001526766,0.0001170649,0.000007365929,0.000003429321,0.002537474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974077,0.001441656,0.0008404307,0.0001317705,0.000147451,0.000002595141,7.393129e-7,0.00001115614,0.00001652176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.463937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4289549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954190558","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12287","title":"Sequential innovation, patent policy, and the dynamics of the replacement effect","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Economics; Business; Industrial organization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05551771249668315,"gpt":0.2074220511189667,"spread":0.1519043386222835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001892033,0.00008448042,0.0002052498,0.00008535177,0.0001326941,0.000102119,0.0002867451,0.00002903221,0.00006437942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000154761,0.00003310131,0.0000950152,0.0001589354,0.0001168872,0.0002118072,0.0001312724,0.000153175,0.00001368944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003780306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003626485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001820413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003146093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993039,0.00004569014,0.0004252231,0.00005814532,0.00006810371,0.00009896648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988849,0.0001426906,0.0006586547,0.0001682229,0.0001419094,0.000003627796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01999327,0.0001531572,0.05038402,0.000587036,0.001421898,0.00000172933,0.002205941,0.01704643,0.0006068073,0.8805538,0.005390441,0.02165552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08538873,0.001203709,0.02870991,0.001236819,0.002019312,0.0004316146,0.003266728,0.5484141,0.007727986,0.2209602,0.09915417,0.001486738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906427,0.00006091717,0.00006415213,0.004081659,0.0006460082,0.0002733347,0.000001444019,0.000001729426,0.004228091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975655,0.00007508465,0.000003374975,0.001311391,0.0004878022,9.415726e-7,0.000001408472,0.000008053066,0.0005464135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6595935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1349832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096862482","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00084.x","title":"Rockets and feathers: Understanding asymmetric pricing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Collusion; Economics; Microeconomics; Work (physics); Empirical evidence; Engineering; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04594695192369845,"gpt":0.2287310981224216,"spread":0.1827841461987232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008999531,0.00009519227,0.0001952124,0.0002707234,0.0001874963,0.0002952058,0.0001514518,0.0000288007,0.00002461343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005150019,0.00006624722,0.00007512232,0.0001690585,0.00002392437,0.0006662092,0.00003270807,0.000149021,0.000004247614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004466353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001430489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001563541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001197396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994405,0.00000949243,0.0002877248,0.00007350824,0.00004627488,0.0001425372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993857,0.0001211681,0.0003566464,0.00008689587,0.00003609604,0.00001348736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009980353,0.0001443002,0.09105501,0.00009247942,0.000257407,0.00004758111,0.001007983,0.0009096118,0.0004018666,0.05137075,0.002378708,0.8513362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01952498,0.0003772085,0.4367204,0.0007704011,0.002665409,0.001114416,0.01145689,0.02112789,0.0003562811,0.4273125,0.07647792,0.002095766],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816388,0.0007859015,0.0008807069,0.001838302,0.0002721311,0.00007100918,2.092924e-7,0.000008494957,0.01450445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983909,0.0003078615,0.00005892387,0.0007106659,0.0004813438,1.509848e-7,2.296074e-7,0.000008045968,0.00004190946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8492405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2846677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124379753","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00115.x","title":"Trigger happy or gun shy? Dissolving common-value partnerships with Texas shootouts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Value (mathematics); Business; Joint (building); Commerce; Economics; Finance; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1447262708694065,"gpt":0.3608671355233203,"spread":0.2161408646539139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004671015,0.000115396,0.0003316975,0.0001010683,0.0003295989,0.0002721313,0.0008884345,0.00005982292,0.0009594663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005156986,0.00005274937,0.0001401785,0.0001764573,0.00026196,0.0003929425,0.00004679068,0.0004479591,0.0001316937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001697231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000132713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002229566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001345859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986259,0.0001433366,0.0007508158,0.0001484464,0.0001669933,0.0001644982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996117,0.002298991,0.0008192727,0.0004826466,0.0001376595,0.0001444578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009392497,0.0006129083,0.02363711,0.00001155187,0.000560978,0.00003974942,0.00523206,0.02063563,0.001209731,0.7904397,0.03466112,0.113567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004215612,0.0004352982,0.007378186,0.00005941701,0.0001954946,0.001840445,0.004346807,0.005584987,0.003675277,0.4526314,0.5191047,0.0005324649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859338,0.00003851084,0.00269365,0.00655388,0.0004106527,0.0001319832,0.000007474362,0.000006947992,0.004223124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954298,0.00004117059,0.0006320849,0.0003047874,0.0004627928,0.000002828724,3.823296e-7,0.00001110427,0.003115076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4844435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474353785","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12219","title":"Patent rights, innovation, and firm exit","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Patent portfolio; Competitor analysis; Endogeneity; Business; Exploit; Portfolio; Industrial organization; Economics; Intellectual property; Finance; Marketing; Econometrics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1602096292188557,"gpt":0.2145804701025033,"spread":0.0543708408836476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005396139,0.00006367955,0.0001136167,0.0001699102,0.000201446,0.000139321,0.0001350622,0.00002555637,0.0002979238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004061736,0.00003496961,0.00002904426,0.0001466499,0.00008192689,0.0004433932,0.00004117365,0.00008671098,0.0001131087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007148959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008398839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004877834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002668156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995295,0.000005600858,0.0002954458,0.00005109261,0.00002960947,0.0000887186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999384,0.00002652183,0.000284867,0.00006789363,0.0002316383,0.000005090172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007760842,0.0004911832,0.02378156,0.0003161363,0.001344912,0.00003633117,0.004673436,0.0007071253,0.001157403,0.4643815,0.3971668,0.09818277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002903619,0.0001364922,0.004137841,0.0000894556,0.000109189,0.00008608557,0.0002382627,0.006236309,0.001058654,0.1688288,0.8159073,0.0002680427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848492,0.0000950758,0.0001175005,0.0009631603,0.0005451626,0.0000499341,4.268387e-7,0.000003490236,0.01337609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959454,0.00008817075,0.00003360671,0.001651464,0.001980277,2.788117e-7,9.024306e-7,0.00000580972,0.0002940689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4187405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3262057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058883788","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00038.x","title":"Buy‐out prices in auctions: seller competition and multi‐unit demands","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Common value auction; Microeconomics; Multiunit auction; Revenue; Revenue equivalence; Vickrey auction; English auction; Competition (biology); Product (mathematics); Dutch auction; Forward auction; Economics; Incentive; Business; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Auction theory; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2151362929964375,"gpt":0.3622466545068098,"spread":0.1471103615103724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00186872,0.0000577726,0.000173554,0.0001490455,0.000270817,0.00005373655,0.0002325561,0.00003360189,0.0001515053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001460488,0.00003598018,0.00005931605,0.0001222462,0.0001735761,0.0003204727,0.00002536135,0.000144068,0.00004938877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001552001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003751321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003053689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004493559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991429,0.00007762338,0.0005436481,0.00008955504,0.00007189241,0.00007430935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986792,0.0006144168,0.0004185849,0.000143727,0.00009411621,0.00004999995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002316928,0.001422436,0.1337133,0.00002325769,0.0004241107,0.00003821611,0.05376435,0.1333681,0.001149532,0.5683704,0.007631515,0.09777787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007769433,0.0002176423,0.1508903,0.00005892248,0.00007184185,0.00250579,0.01267796,0.02071337,0.001031096,0.6048692,0.1987533,0.0004411359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985113,0.0002765337,0.01157428,0.001462375,0.0001929419,0.00006884507,0.000003302061,0.000002918548,0.001305799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965208,0.001402619,0.001109399,0.0001182799,0.0001443536,0.000002251763,3.456301e-7,0.000003163598,0.0006988169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1911217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2082933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149680547","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00123.x","title":"Entry and pricing in a differentiated products industry: evidence from the ATM market","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economic surplus; Welfare; Economics; Microeconomics; Product differentiation; Industrial organization; Regression discontinuity design; ATM card; Discontinuity (linguistics); Econometrics; Business; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05928147054270073,"gpt":0.2179730506105581,"spread":0.1586915800678574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001184388,0.0001050357,0.0001944823,0.00007209086,0.0001008665,0.0001632716,0.0002825455,0.00005377974,0.0002366966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001985476,0.00005972049,0.00004031993,0.0001216325,0.00005295467,0.0006387681,0.0001267405,0.0003885088,0.000003255029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001627624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002744612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006668642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002822558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993159,0.00004104133,0.0003524091,0.0001052884,0.00004479174,0.0001405324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991127,0.0002630369,0.000398658,0.0001627828,0.00005254701,0.0000102233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005709722,0.00003527846,0.9781424,0.00002163505,0.00005631331,0.000008907253,0.0009128672,0.000008260463,0.0001430962,0.00008615496,0.000719848,0.0192942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008603716,0.000007122484,0.9949722,0.0002563591,0.0001637509,0.00001412743,0.0004417149,0.0006332206,0.00008210063,0.001306017,0.001158806,0.0001042554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961083,0.001008045,0.00000813489,0.001207315,0.0003218417,0.000124785,7.953792e-7,0.000004281856,0.001216503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987139,0.0004919836,0.00003168231,0.000273152,0.0004220133,0.000001328259,4.011115e-7,0.000009594193,0.00005591664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01918995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2591662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551732285","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12163","title":"Understanding in‐house transactions in the real estate brokerage industry","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Real estate; Business; Database transaction; Promotion (chess); Matching (statistics); Transaction data; Finance; Transaction cost; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Economics; Database; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1182698243248194,"gpt":0.2301209047459946,"spread":0.1118510804211751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002856667,0.0001301626,0.0003882579,0.0002902547,0.0001018535,0.0001010264,0.0004198913,0.0001455516,0.000157178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004106287,0.00008239119,0.0001506138,0.0001297977,0.00009936082,0.0004596416,0.00001200806,0.0004846537,0.00003618341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004595612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006373085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000161347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001586746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984986,0.00005778309,0.001003684,0.0001437661,0.00001592885,0.000280286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987019,0.0004261041,0.0005669516,0.000242544,0.000009211605,0.0000533112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003233091,0.001093582,0.45248,0.000095506,0.0007455393,0.000218803,0.05013232,0.07913823,0.00007027626,0.2795683,0.001649922,0.1315744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03229585,0.0007211508,0.1036727,0.000455785,0.0001185324,0.0007903982,0.01813141,0.01302243,0.0001666029,0.7481184,0.0804201,0.002086674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562251,0.00005531851,0.002970741,0.004308577,0.000503565,0.0001136149,0.00001875496,0.000006029139,0.03579831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859779,0.01353102,0.000053905,0.0001543625,0.0001465078,0.000002889127,1.940753e-7,0.00002622014,0.0001070331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.46855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3359815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157118148","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12054","title":"Subjective evaluations with performance feedback","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Commit; Imperfect; Measure (data warehouse); Distribution (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0354564531211177,"gpt":0.3094817112847,"spread":0.2740252581635824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001331038,0.00006005283,0.0001554406,0.0000321411,0.0004562072,0.00005327748,0.0002027935,0.00002213467,0.00004387803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003319791,0.00003908663,0.00005147052,0.00003914526,0.0002744196,0.0002763006,0.00001906749,0.00009897131,0.0000214715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000153178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001202015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000833538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000635322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994711,0.00008864323,0.000210272,0.00005590265,0.00004822575,0.000125805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993638,0.0001392573,0.0002714227,0.00008246982,0.00009390837,0.000049095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002672293,0.0004942394,0.4079918,0.00002260639,0.001007158,0.000002691417,0.2283177,0.03230669,0.0005534142,0.2106683,0.001818218,0.1141448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02987727,0.007462268,0.4557516,0.0004416066,0.001497174,0.0002951659,0.2033922,0.00876904,0.02047065,0.08820893,0.181015,0.002819122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618585,0.0001129128,0.0000376547,0.001210951,0.0002264999,0.00008821193,9.871665e-7,0.000003265094,0.03646099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985399,0.0005723779,0.0002582512,0.00009898301,0.0002633063,0.00000263449,1.545583e-7,0.000006104468,0.0002582724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1791968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3508823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117277881","doi":"10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00011.x","title":"Market forces meet behavioral biases: cost misallocation and irrational pricing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Activity-based costing; Economics; Microeconomics; Variable (mathematics); Variable cost; Irrational number; Process (computing); Fixed cost; Industrial organization; Computer science; Accounting","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09289770086737785,"gpt":0.3361066963595117,"spread":0.2432089954921339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007387478,0.00007548655,0.0001781685,0.00004968399,0.0006633768,0.00006125431,0.0001530174,0.00003748988,0.00005821952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004509552,0.00006005667,0.00006266766,0.00003409311,0.0003679677,0.0004034499,0.00003068656,0.00007552442,0.000002693032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001504036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001327419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003071126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001034648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993286,0.0000694894,0.0003375594,0.00007645441,0.00005548255,0.0001323855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992977,0.0001918826,0.0003154703,0.00006104675,0.00006446223,0.0000694671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002361937,0.001084487,0.5077024,0.00003054152,0.0006607402,0.00005491227,0.3492384,0.004403221,0.002413576,0.06626479,0.03727317,0.02851181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03055747,0.003367993,0.2917725,0.0006235912,0.001461753,0.002315221,0.3912608,0.006909464,0.01186629,0.04903923,0.2067128,0.004112791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918789,0.000602273,0.00001369919,0.001226094,0.0002897619,0.0001491987,0.000005708527,0.000004310426,0.005830054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961234,0.002854695,0.0003314192,0.0001077555,0.0002506736,0.000004145277,9.635195e-7,0.000006816233,0.0003200853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2159299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5102225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138474256","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12362","title":"Finding Mr. Schumpeter: technology adoption in the cement industry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Competition (biology); Cement; Economics; Kiln; Industrial organization; Creative destruction; Microeconomics; Business; Market economy; Engineering; Management; Waste management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03834840147008711,"gpt":0.2156708097831359,"spread":0.1773224083130488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00187541,0.000143047,0.0004127273,0.0002871475,0.0001119113,0.00009527396,0.0005518582,0.0002147631,0.0002747897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008989673,0.0001176267,0.0001523798,0.0001717791,0.00009761763,0.0002607035,0.0000922139,0.0007331182,0.0000812367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002757963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004748349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009409981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003539765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983847,0.0000485459,0.001072087,0.0002104791,0.0000199085,0.0002643024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984474,0.0001147685,0.0009688024,0.000412537,0.00001410869,0.00004241057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001146949,0.0003543594,0.19439,0.00002764745,0.0003809289,0.00007240382,0.001502316,0.0359854,0.0001626035,0.7603899,0.00104063,0.005579223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01189712,0.0005154872,0.1246487,0.000187528,0.0001159275,0.001613638,0.009368489,0.004830771,0.003537874,0.5669196,0.2750936,0.001271173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825034,0.002270577,0.0002279732,0.007507114,0.0005066017,0.00008950987,0.00001470319,0.000003900878,0.006876212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995651,0.002747502,0.0003957996,0.0006908597,0.0002450346,0.000007578424,0.00000276132,0.00001872138,0.0002407185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.274053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4796676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107602559","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00068.x","title":"An empirical study of auction revenue rankings: the case of municipal bonds","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Common value auction; Revenue; Auction theory; Revenue equivalence; Dutch auction; Microeconomics; Economics; Multiunit auction; English auction; Econometrics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09448032583841379,"gpt":0.3995126808605751,"spread":0.3050323550221613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005121017,0.0000575757,0.0002378914,0.00008910024,0.0002070981,0.00003939528,0.0005093638,0.00002999166,0.00005387138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012364,0.00002932973,0.0001016449,0.0001857236,0.0001680687,0.0001906038,0.00002819073,0.0001459104,0.000003327403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001452854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003430424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009985246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000303223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984739,0.0003647727,0.0009114336,0.00008400945,0.00009918836,0.00006664539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974793,0.0007618112,0.00114422,0.0004219762,0.0001649044,0.00002777632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004322934,0.004775551,0.02297206,0.00001248671,0.0004840892,0.00007958396,0.06606627,0.7664803,0.001875445,0.04854234,0.01196482,0.07242414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005854812,0.001828689,0.0199839,0.00002313307,0.0003712717,0.004612387,0.08866328,0.01511783,0.002041084,0.8467093,0.01455191,0.0002423749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979998,0.00006573775,0.0008306641,0.0006176413,0.0001343152,0.0001099454,0.0000111311,0.000001224496,0.0002295081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995265,0.00001469035,0.0000527548,0.00003393468,0.0002347307,0.000001668628,2.028868e-7,0.000004014764,0.0001315076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.798167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1774853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105211254","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00074.x","title":"Liability insurance under the negligence rule","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Liability; Strict liability; Harm; Contributory negligence; Damages; Actuarial science; Contractible space; Business; Liability insurance; Incentive; Economics; Tort; Law and economics; Insurance policy; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03342304927442657,"gpt":0.2189524972361905,"spread":0.1855294479617639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002838718,0.0001580262,0.0006488872,0.00008083735,0.0002988368,0.0001806122,0.0008410946,0.00009952622,0.0001811183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008810654,0.0001264401,0.0003468101,0.0001037611,0.0002510183,0.0004247606,0.0000373074,0.0003176672,0.0003107117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000175019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006916025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009224164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000490585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978849,0.0000545867,0.001490715,0.0002302273,0.00002438115,0.0003152147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976118,0.0002253265,0.001455385,0.0005435187,0.00005934333,0.0001045797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003243467,0.0002003285,0.03171531,0.0000165385,0.0002767304,0.000003430353,0.001507459,0.01186624,0.00002009392,0.94282,0.003415368,0.007834109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001203281,0.0001621706,0.05806954,0.00002274107,0.00001642138,0.00007223444,0.0002882569,0.0007730049,0.0001003442,0.9057783,0.03324044,0.0002731842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458454,0.004834698,0.0007969947,0.006884105,0.001813494,0.0002211725,0.00004790641,0.000009861447,0.0395464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938884,0.002986114,0.00007126863,0.001730211,0.001020285,0.00000249012,7.834558e-7,0.00001589612,0.0002845785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04804301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5156076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124933251","doi":"10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00017.x","title":"A theory of factor allocation and plant size","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Factor price; Growth theory; Factor (programming language); Capital (architecture); Microeconomics; Trade theory; Neoclassical economics; International trade; Computer science; Free trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04518968572530954,"gpt":0.1900875645136538,"spread":0.1448978787883443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001100657,0.00008957142,0.0004042133,0.00008061149,0.00008495394,0.0000144824,0.0001753224,0.00004855823,0.00009966197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000179025,0.0000738995,0.0001052183,0.00003311427,0.000140207,0.0002402374,0.00002535803,0.0001311383,0.00001283767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003125113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003819362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001569296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005891864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990426,0.0000281343,0.0006907082,0.0001140597,0.000008913623,0.0001155301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984794,0.000352101,0.0009111916,0.0001740319,0.00002569445,0.00005759755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001696937,0.0002460507,0.2401856,0.00009856813,0.0007693223,0.000007850625,0.00897198,0.0007795896,0.0002999135,0.7378277,0.0009287249,0.008187861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049426,0.0004818122,0.3260464,0.0000351977,0.00004702282,0.0009269539,0.0004148413,0.001062366,0.003066364,0.6435372,0.01894551,0.0004936453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937059,0.002732174,0.0003682774,0.000649444,0.0003280242,0.00007443643,0.00007855814,0.000002173913,0.002060968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995693,0.003656818,0.0002108177,0.00009004203,0.0001796064,8.715367e-7,7.488372e-7,0.000009460078,0.0001586521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09429038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3013534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128944627","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00141.x","title":"Optimal information transmission in a holdup problem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transmission (telecommunications); Information transmission; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Computer network; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03724675036204947,"gpt":0.1911170722657427,"spread":0.1538703219036932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00186319,0.0001139132,0.0005174636,0.0002668164,0.0000747653,0.00007549143,0.0003657296,0.0001034721,0.0002119931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002150202,0.0001123455,0.0001901029,0.00008142717,0.00008138982,0.001139802,0.00002381126,0.0002119009,0.0001532642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001286084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004846622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002752922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003939169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979712,0.0000236561,0.001653371,0.0001082124,0.00001463965,0.0002288887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998429,0.00004123781,0.001232305,0.0001753507,0.00003183281,0.00009024615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001979741,0.0004128477,0.04411867,0.0001800256,0.0004699891,0.0000137706,0.04520118,0.01432488,0.00001401256,0.8629432,0.001766528,0.02857515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01306027,0.0008839119,0.02722503,0.0002339628,0.00005981827,0.0003022054,0.002268886,0.01468477,0.0004745983,0.7949885,0.1447503,0.001067845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165407,0.001115312,0.003789388,0.0004538557,0.000715125,0.0002757071,0.00002572866,0.000007234685,0.07707694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966619,0.001559571,0.001314511,0.0001895525,0.0001977702,0.000005057332,0.000002005271,0.00001416814,0.00005543579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1429837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4581317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033247675","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12317","title":"Search and Wholesale Price Discrimination","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Price discrimination; Search cost; Economics; Microeconomics; Incentive; Competition (biology); Limit price; Price level; Monetary economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04588373300788622,"gpt":0.2337561621721553,"spread":0.1878724291642691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004741204,0.0000497104,0.0001062505,0.00004484438,0.00008367417,0.0001715833,0.000116751,0.00001419427,0.00005169898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003366336,0.00003418116,0.0000382182,0.00005397944,0.00002784341,0.0004980706,0.00005990058,0.0001090667,0.00001026681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006048845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000117504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001960668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008984414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996575,0.000008284793,0.0001783387,0.00004996817,0.00003309727,0.00007280274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999722,0.00004915565,0.0001236736,0.00004408277,0.00004876218,0.00001233944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001951237,0.0001251686,0.2432997,0.0005750105,0.0002401708,0.00003689323,0.005565857,0.002407224,0.002782388,0.02235567,0.004261189,0.7163995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01122951,0.0001551241,0.640807,0.0002275203,0.001200664,0.0001922543,0.008243335,0.08409783,0.0009228428,0.01061375,0.2413281,0.0009820828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894158,0.0002214885,0.0002139539,0.007495338,0.0001095378,0.00004794731,4.558204e-7,0.00000383992,0.002491593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983221,0.0001698204,0.00003596705,0.0008690735,0.00057095,2.502763e-7,5.401215e-7,0.000006392066,0.00002488108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7154174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1654582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125137167","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12187","title":"Monopoly regulation under asymmetric information: prices versus quantities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico","keywords":"Marginal cost; Monopoly; Economics; Microeconomics; Marginal utility; Mechanism (biology); Private information retrieval; Simple (philosophy); Welfare; Market economy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1678554619222355,"gpt":0.3745938180170931,"spread":0.2067383560948576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002543651,0.00005546895,0.0001466773,0.0001706243,0.0007427117,0.0007418381,0.0008025063,0.00003395445,0.0001108334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006991619,0.00003315681,0.0001020596,0.00008578259,0.0001629773,0.002196384,0.00004954153,0.00009517167,0.0001411988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002845707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004781265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004987708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000821011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991097,0.00004209541,0.0005901056,0.00005208241,0.000133984,0.00007200689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968206,0.0008026542,0.00168779,0.0004359861,0.0002099032,0.00004309073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007945965,0.00002217477,0.0004387842,0.000001776926,0.0000862043,1.681122e-7,0.000855693,0.03156561,0.000008868557,0.8707069,0.005707212,0.089812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002194962,0.0001205097,0.03270077,0.000007165416,0.00004522271,0.00003878786,0.004238532,0.003351995,0.000518533,0.835272,0.1213877,0.000123775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9339641,0.0001582087,0.02952588,0.01131451,0.001696306,0.00009129699,0.000007128483,0.000005280262,0.02323728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987637,0.0001536283,0.0002904461,0.0001313139,0.0002654751,9.899045e-7,4.283211e-7,0.000002300757,0.0003916578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1156805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7153562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293826008","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12422","title":"Does consumer demand pull scientifically novel drug innovation?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Consumer demand; On demand; Economics; Drug; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Computer science; Commerce; Pharmacology; Medicine; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05755306486378076,"gpt":0.266729548639784,"spread":0.2091764837760032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003660138,0.0001432441,0.0004596977,0.0003827899,0.0004569317,0.0001625491,0.0006821797,0.00003313726,0.001347772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001053285,0.0001023802,0.0001921761,0.0002873758,0.0001656104,0.0002764265,0.0001811405,0.0004529008,0.00008848283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001734679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001076121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002443069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001278198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980127,0.00003179387,0.001423842,0.0002154797,0.00002934493,0.0002868235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998075,0.0001894007,0.001281578,0.0002864683,0.00006702577,0.0001005191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003145379,0.0002930703,0.009532788,0.00001735655,0.0003012177,0.000003890904,0.0008744269,0.01237887,0.0002056246,0.9611203,0.01373219,0.001225719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002834195,0.00005670094,0.001184732,0.000004531614,0.00002701972,0.00008757655,0.0002089403,0.006760693,0.0002862109,0.1866239,0.8016413,0.0002842273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754851,0.000944981,0.0006992011,0.01248659,0.002934553,0.0001741606,0.0004116731,0.000006883953,0.006856859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993618,0.0005205608,0.000240774,0.003844618,0.0003653771,0.000009063822,0.000005808051,0.00002437495,0.001371449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7879091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124158248","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12171","title":"The impact of firm size on dynamic incentives and investment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Moral hazard; Incentive; Volatility (finance); Investment (military); Principal–agent problem; Economics; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; Agency (philosophy); Industrial organization; Econometrics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01704625472299118,"gpt":0.235791172898779,"spread":0.2187449181757878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004453245,0.00007141681,0.0001515011,0.0000170268,0.0003028495,0.0002061132,0.000301841,0.00001586607,0.000007294662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001004334,0.00003513601,0.00009275643,0.00001479192,0.000128884,0.0004660994,0.00005812982,0.0000825598,0.000004334655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002631565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002753104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001207319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008759426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996134,0.00000491731,0.0002133381,0.00004876832,0.00003284925,0.00008674007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983621,0.0001052994,0.001279585,0.0002007501,0.00004598266,0.000006318791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008181753,0.000459023,0.7150889,0.000167456,0.001383683,0.00003448808,0.0007735944,0.01215474,0.0007766243,0.1142925,0.01556455,0.1311227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001287993,0.00005420949,0.9639558,0.00006015473,0.0000301203,0.000004522407,0.00004529664,0.001915892,0.00001893631,0.02778793,0.004776131,0.00006297931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958435,0.0003044055,0.000004203526,0.001315321,0.000188284,0.00005938756,0.000003216013,9.05873e-7,0.002280732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981701,0.001282446,0.000005581654,0.0001956775,0.0002103869,4.695576e-7,1.218248e-7,0.000005330086,0.0001299027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.248867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2329304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125688331","doi":"10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00002.x","title":"Rules of proof, courts, and incentives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Incentive; Imperfect; Civil litigation; Tort; Law and economics; Civil procedure; Tort reform; Arbitration; Standard of care; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Liability; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0349545227360615,"gpt":0.1987669883141061,"spread":0.1638124655780446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001121553,0.0001097935,0.000712322,0.0001375786,0.0001398445,0.00003337529,0.0002746041,0.00007317319,0.00005827522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005874561,0.0001073918,0.000176186,0.00002637331,0.00039572,0.0003160037,0.00004737103,0.0001356559,0.00002247861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005044504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008714468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001580657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983925,0.00002408721,0.001247035,0.0001434517,0.00001554588,0.0001774197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979609,0.000118249,0.001598147,0.0001911292,0.00004868602,0.00008293376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004463594,0.0002014609,0.09839995,0.00008644793,0.0006554557,0.00001040059,0.005506666,0.0007501711,0.00003178399,0.8896768,0.00173387,0.002500612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005138336,0.0004378761,0.04581344,0.00009043523,0.00005240189,0.0005653832,0.0005191204,0.001578363,0.0008842302,0.9050949,0.03930693,0.0005185414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797843,0.007048359,0.0002467995,0.0004391733,0.0006315801,0.000136422,0.00006370658,0.000002890258,0.01164674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990517,0.008641134,0.0001851072,0.00008946338,0.0003996906,0.000001627964,0.000001124989,0.00001707647,0.0001477883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05258651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.437931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1772563446","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12100","title":"Building new plants or entering by acquisition? Firm heterogeneity and entry barriers in the U.S. cement industry","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"Fundación Caja Madrid; US-UK Fulbright Commission; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Industrial organization; Business; Permissive; Cement; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06025304224350463,"gpt":0.2571469664208905,"spread":0.1968939241773859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001417609,0.0000934768,0.0002312416,0.0001055567,0.00006977652,0.0001148526,0.0002463971,0.00007965067,0.00007155002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005319199,0.000064154,0.00004392016,0.00007195395,0.0000350523,0.0002329025,0.000039529,0.0002792309,0.000006298118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009059683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005193348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004230791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002191956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990953,0.00002447251,0.0006060423,0.0001039983,0.00002247114,0.0001476728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992522,0.00005962814,0.0004427498,0.0001241283,0.00001356167,0.0001077582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003278664,0.0003252045,0.7591892,0.00007558693,0.0008072919,0.0000612352,0.01477304,0.007063169,0.0001876815,0.09886727,0.1036038,0.01176785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04078454,0.001520589,0.1130957,0.0003351339,0.00008296028,0.00174934,0.01040936,0.008869209,0.002929357,0.2052348,0.6132926,0.001696367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943359,0.001298129,0.0004182882,0.002886034,0.0003285898,0.00008278714,0.00003549341,0.000001970579,0.0006127414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975778,0.0005459984,0.0001862994,0.001429448,0.0001814441,0.000001516022,0.000001761038,0.000007991967,0.00006767157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6460935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2616124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208369227","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.70056","title":"Preemptive Entry and Technology Diffusion: The Market for Drive-in Theaters","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Diffusion; Business; Industrial organization; Computer science; Advertising; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03498891142214097,"gpt":0.2354846277104697,"spread":0.2004957162883287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002599166,0.0001964553,0.0007847986,0.0004105275,0.0001234698,0.00009964532,0.0004026011,0.0002715842,0.0002279072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000309735,0.0001331034,0.00019941,0.0001837239,0.0001681175,0.00009227594,0.0001051788,0.0005391639,0.000004751805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002003278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002379709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002078592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005556454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982606,0.00002656605,0.001239561,0.0002307112,0.00002901475,0.0002136174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975387,0.0002930483,0.001637375,0.0003167193,0.0001792958,0.00003486681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002229013,0.0006768314,0.2184249,0.001034156,0.004582213,0.0001109888,0.005294663,0.0004020637,0.0000383905,0.4725686,0.2355089,0.05912935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003880507,0.0002075803,0.01133897,0.000264436,0.00007940962,0.0006079057,0.001001667,0.0009002246,0.00005997426,0.1433554,0.8378664,0.0004374445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7429769,0.05074899,0.0009482095,0.0467466,0.00664969,0.001677507,0.0007134871,0.00001701332,0.1495216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8592038,0.1189035,0.0006677847,0.001044751,0.001823682,0.0000769918,0.00003409195,0.0001187477,0.01812665],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6023575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5427799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407185229","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12493","title":"The Effects of Advertising Disclosure Regulations on Social Media: Evidence From Instagram","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Advertising; Social media; Business; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01995530897078847,"gpt":0.284977070726578,"spread":0.2650217617557895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001903762,0.00005708106,0.0001848657,0.00003217186,0.0007176592,0.000108234,0.0003299251,0.0000577717,0.000003107825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005212048,0.00003425196,0.0001386041,0.0001041958,0.0003823548,0.000170094,0.00002537485,0.000163442,9.375399e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008145625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002530461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007957537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000825852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990022,0.0003934982,0.0003181582,0.00005437151,0.000108301,0.0001235063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887514,0.01071326,0.0003346553,0.00008202033,0.00008193859,0.00003673344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009741577,0.0001281785,0.005558494,0.0000466264,0.0004729556,0.000004051199,0.09702901,0.0002577589,0.0001344812,0.1282829,0.006469264,0.7606421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003673562,0.0002310811,0.3256985,0.003100088,0.0005545503,0.000001276873,0.04194499,0.0001216538,0.0009378456,0.5788308,0.04449865,0.0004070345],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820997,0.000985734,0.0000212661,0.00780702,0.001717241,0.00008769286,0.00000341608,0.00000416406,0.007273797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970404,0.002043555,0.00001695111,0.00006773372,0.0006205907,0.000001145808,2.419013e-7,0.000003593139,0.000205769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7602351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6239684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944321426","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12336","title":"The curse of knowledge: having access to customer information can reduce monopoly profits","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Curse; Profit (economics); Business; Microeconomics; Markov chain; Economics; Marketing; Industrial organization; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04008306000705253,"gpt":0.2384889878230176,"spread":0.1984059278159651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004126078,0.00009509354,0.0002023815,0.00008013664,0.0001477136,0.0009764404,0.0005593129,0.00002623374,0.00001384219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001077884,0.00005707467,0.00009463954,0.0001174769,0.00004213918,0.005659485,0.0001645475,0.0001183888,0.00008502036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002948639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005986412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003252928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005682048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991851,0.000001568275,0.000578957,0.00005207489,0.00003615625,0.0001461765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989368,0.00005308544,0.0007298519,0.0001102556,0.0001409107,0.00002912899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003734508,0.0001656998,0.007181356,0.0005556491,0.0006988998,0.000003187144,0.008338758,0.08718706,0.0001803192,0.1830432,0.08420762,0.6247038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005944121,0.0001926545,0.008150849,0.0002743959,0.0003626233,0.00003719456,0.01510136,0.05176866,0.002114085,0.03756612,0.8774877,0.001000273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760228,0.00008559335,0.00003593485,0.005329032,0.0004988966,0.0001650285,0.000003058703,0.000005318306,0.01785435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974879,0.00007423591,0.0000193298,0.001624544,0.0007411605,0.000001919069,0.000001802359,0.000009517343,0.00003956897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7932801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9415838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888144226","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12245","title":"Auctions with <i>ex post</i> uncertainty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Common value auction; Nonparametric statistics; Econometrics; Identification (biology); Semiparametric model; Component (thermodynamics); Computer science; Ex-ante; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06357171760187409,"gpt":0.3283799436029881,"spread":0.264808226001114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002143454,0.00005999756,0.000153579,0.00007879182,0.0003302811,0.0001128855,0.0004934761,0.00002358563,0.0004732685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001743608,0.00002902515,0.00009080693,0.0001771367,0.0003517324,0.0002532529,0.00002445684,0.000118542,0.0002695864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000213964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009843752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004224694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005777003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991912,0.00008162576,0.0004449865,0.00009146166,0.00009863315,0.00009204848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981294,0.0005415295,0.0005206016,0.0002975527,0.0004412497,0.0000696811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005041424,0.0003788511,0.001884122,0.000003255052,0.0005726549,0.000006062973,0.008600472,0.1065503,0.0009410568,0.6041866,0.07515687,0.1966783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001363963,0.0004841461,0.001077514,0.00001005188,0.00006461115,0.0007731924,0.004200619,0.001526847,0.001252668,0.4909697,0.4981323,0.000144372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714795,0.00003223152,0.01141675,0.008083645,0.0003864927,0.00006256843,0.000009905348,0.000004503589,0.008524418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966688,0.00003491438,0.0004162462,0.0006480241,0.0006821761,9.954352e-7,2.530806e-7,0.000004766469,0.001543864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4229755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5181958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997073286","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00080.x","title":"Efficiency out of disorder: Contested ownership in incomplete contracts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Incomplete contracts; Inefficiency; Equity (law); Business; Microeconomics; CONTEST; Transaction cost; Database transaction; Investment (military); Economics; Incentive; Industrial organization","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0412564438536225,"gpt":0.2223143231207442,"spread":0.1810578792671217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002426012,0.0001615313,0.001103932,0.0002876098,0.00007444516,0.00006260649,0.0005499608,0.0001128816,0.00005797063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002085212,0.0001568108,0.0002897914,0.0001064404,0.0001721605,0.0003271156,0.00002475947,0.0002600293,0.00004723834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001448355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000634266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001871225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003274436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971563,0.00005110332,0.002248048,0.0001976025,0.00002397031,0.0003229295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969968,0.000272897,0.002268696,0.0003011608,0.00005780732,0.0001025938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001370397,0.0009106104,0.1225967,0.00006156652,0.0003703024,0.00002422785,0.006881533,0.01510206,0.0001664236,0.8418801,0.0005646836,0.01007144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01910184,0.001659718,0.1134564,0.0002640303,0.00006681532,0.0001348104,0.001520969,0.01062128,0.0003933718,0.8260556,0.02564672,0.001078496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971406,0.003042831,0.0005073744,0.001638733,0.001085391,0.0002561403,0.00004669615,0.000005566917,0.02201128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982777,0.0009483694,0.00005154292,0.0003109437,0.00032305,0.000001550216,0.000001908943,0.00001656497,0.00006836353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02687172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.639456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120371963","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00065.x","title":"To bundle or not to bundle","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle; Monopoly; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0251970328773649,"gpt":0.2104681464032732,"spread":0.1852711135259082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005111386,0.0001243287,0.0002682574,0.0001643142,0.0001143764,0.0008968197,0.0003633558,0.00003253426,0.0001632075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004076554,0.00007969861,0.0001210943,0.0001018904,0.00001834804,0.001967858,0.0001093857,0.00008784687,0.0006583836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005242161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002911118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001619251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005406439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991319,7.722538e-7,0.0005001491,0.0001013712,0.00003961996,0.0002261813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993848,0.00005209106,0.0003088245,0.0001595272,0.00006474562,0.00002997842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01012603,0.001158602,0.004550885,0.000155501,0.0004202607,0.00003366618,0.0003938397,0.2896467,0.0003473551,0.4359368,0.202809,0.05442135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00318055,0.0003088896,0.005108373,0.0000748016,0.0001119919,0.00008832693,0.0009629004,0.002981384,0.0004097832,0.09481935,0.8912879,0.0006657231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971709,0.0000135323,0.0001843131,0.002344785,0.0006371519,0.0001225757,0.000003380762,0.000008648382,0.02497668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901167,0.00001080809,0.000254513,0.005471784,0.002575048,0.000001451409,0.000001924099,0.00002174696,0.001546018],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6884789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8648053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412510625","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.70001","title":"Measuring Substitution Patterns in the Attention Economy: An Experimental Approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Toulouse School of Economics; Singapore Management University; Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Stanford Graduate School of Business; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; Imperial College London; Booth School of Business, University of Chicago; Northwestern University","keywords":"Substitution (logic); Economics; Macroeconomics; Econometrics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04510897741786923,"gpt":0.2140807761310246,"spread":0.1689717987131553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009893182,0.0000921158,0.0001641276,0.000147291,0.0001209526,0.0007833436,0.0003445591,0.00003148117,0.00001095413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008599821,0.00005770697,0.000098786,0.00005859712,0.00003103428,0.003887924,0.00004134703,0.0001266404,0.00001009999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007129469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002237811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004724175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007775362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993624,0.000003861368,0.0003957393,0.00008753977,0.00002277958,0.0001276532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995205,0.00002253456,0.0002877618,0.000137866,0.00002489624,0.000006447954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007174916,0.0007414064,0.05482334,0.0001467822,0.0001868519,0.000007495245,0.0007034755,0.03998902,0.0001179304,0.8887205,0.0004084888,0.01343719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02083644,0.0002096287,0.1609215,0.0004910224,0.0004864779,0.0002830796,0.06975362,0.2175734,0.0008380555,0.4778258,0.04907177,0.001709204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676244,0.00008492731,0.0003107311,0.0002366011,0.0003319635,0.0001164016,5.564642e-7,0.000003899217,0.03129053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986605,0.00002119381,0.00001801652,0.0007961092,0.0004687464,0.000003733683,0.000005969557,0.00000589118,0.00001983263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4108947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7553801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073212410","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00003.x","title":"Industry dynamics with stochastic demand","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Productivity; Aggregate demand; Microeconomics; Supply and demand; Demand shock; Welfare; Aggregate (composite); Demand management; Distribution (mathematics); Realization (probability); Industrial organization; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03287581967217207,"gpt":0.1902724199183399,"spread":0.1573966002461679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000591149,0.0001058074,0.0003330635,0.0001610928,0.0001444844,0.00003516621,0.0002437363,0.0001441066,0.0001216395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000420833,0.00007865435,0.0000812483,0.0001358111,0.0001255848,0.0002249825,0.00001945166,0.0005833918,0.00004965869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009310452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005879522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001042223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001557457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990609,0.000009650132,0.000658042,0.0001010555,0.00001757727,0.000152792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988585,0.00006601928,0.0007814645,0.0001736011,0.00005735786,0.00006302617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007430514,0.0002010373,0.08306704,0.00002289085,0.0005732228,0.00004065226,0.00167678,0.06170598,0.00000280215,0.8470698,0.003740918,0.001155806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03294539,0.002520198,0.2207072,0.0002302197,0.0001912455,0.01171278,0.002076353,0.1782667,0.0002241128,0.4970841,0.05140898,0.002632719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811921,0.0004215975,0.009805636,0.002057979,0.0002982576,0.00007106341,0.00002325425,0.000004741759,0.006125434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982175,0.0001710249,0.0003162334,0.0005121969,0.0001991829,0.000001243028,0.000001888064,0.00001669484,0.0005640303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3499857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3207431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398133451","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12463","title":"Robust contracts in common agency","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Business; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05578355229508858,"gpt":0.2215754682165888,"spread":0.1657919159215002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002612768,0.0001395172,0.0007703654,0.0002959346,0.000077283,0.0002452423,0.0004237714,0.0001140591,0.0002129286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004886157,0.0001402268,0.0002868469,0.0001164399,0.0001115788,0.0005130068,0.00003675344,0.0003571789,0.0003077289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002457863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006989804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002687003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003771088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977233,0.00003520128,0.001729903,0.0002075364,0.00001574025,0.0002882667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987122,0.0002380657,0.0006873906,0.0002446582,0.00002013258,0.00009751321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001945332,0.0001197966,0.01725103,0.00007509883,0.000375511,0.00007970425,0.002947726,0.01522494,0.00001145253,0.9520455,0.00315455,0.008520167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002292619,0.0001675506,0.01039118,0.0001746322,0.00003248677,0.0002397706,0.0002434393,0.01592129,0.00005166976,0.8744954,0.09555574,0.0004341583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9280087,0.01695713,0.0003933532,0.001962641,0.003869154,0.0001913828,0.00005497338,0.00001243723,0.04855023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936209,0.00475277,0.00005904904,0.0002691674,0.0009890008,0.000003604662,0.000001936481,0.00003162089,0.0002719628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09240119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5718283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509900014","doi":"","title":"Wealth Constraints and Option Contracts in Models with Sequential Investments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Insider; Loan; Value (mathematics); Finance; Economics; Business; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0303779685647586,"gpt":0.2085859868751527,"spread":0.1782080183103941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007122556,0.00007670575,0.0001650974,0.00008523995,0.00005881085,0.0001232555,0.00008696767,0.00003192522,0.00001909119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002447567,0.00005071418,0.00002840845,0.00003907734,0.00009533772,0.001003545,0.0000179278,0.0001365704,0.000003357742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002907911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004459855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001295051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003898515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995064,0.00001575874,0.0002519211,0.00006349316,0.00003759417,0.0001248569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999542,0.00002660624,0.0003229668,0.0000572846,0.00003577778,0.00001538424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000646827,0.0001235398,0.004688332,0.00004972837,0.0001271895,0.00003497998,0.0003169098,0.01236828,0.0001258338,0.9766469,0.0001088971,0.004762563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02608167,0.0001871582,0.01356451,0.0003563827,0.0002929997,0.0006768564,0.001708518,0.02437852,0.0003334357,0.9192753,0.01250023,0.0006443492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934887,0.0002260702,0.0006543581,0.0004874007,0.0001905114,0.0001003197,8.729829e-7,0.000002387096,0.004849413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998543,0.0002681568,0.0001555744,0.0008307361,0.0001841243,6.59673e-7,9.747616e-7,0.000006400004,0.00001043828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05737155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2068064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082848041","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12023","title":"Multidimensional heterogeneity and the economic importance of risk and matching: evidence from contractual data and field experiments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Earnings; Sorting; Economics; Business; Econometrics; Finance; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04914172965321277,"gpt":0.252116924310493,"spread":0.2029751946572802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001966856,0.0001566923,0.0006150623,0.00005605806,0.0001509276,0.0001366594,0.0003751054,0.00007517099,0.0001118455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002455556,0.0001118087,0.00007495246,0.00001399419,0.0002961109,0.0007317761,0.0002772029,0.0002144985,0.000009795479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003917103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003369026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001232535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002179058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984936,0.00005877118,0.001006641,0.0002648024,0.00001545258,0.0001607742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961851,0.001915301,0.00133997,0.0004468206,0.00001988329,0.00009298523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003252339,0.00009472773,0.9462865,0.00004995888,0.001276538,0.00000363359,0.008586306,0.001540642,0.0001409845,0.0180931,0.001875328,0.01879994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02596839,0.0004112557,0.3491417,0.0002727447,0.0003852707,0.0002881869,0.004177529,0.1791653,0.001146354,0.4343483,0.003397773,0.001297258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899027,0.008038576,0.0002901194,0.0008920248,0.0003591052,0.0001771603,0.0001109327,0.00000230406,0.0002271123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746609,0.02396036,0.0009847266,0.0002155901,0.0001532952,0.000002624443,0.000002843975,0.00001411103,0.000005545567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5971448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4559428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}