{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":32,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":32,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"9bb96700732d","filters":{"venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2158332646","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00038.x","title":"How to Collaborate: Procedural Knowledge in the Cooperative Development of Science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Scarcity; Knowledge management; Descriptive knowledge; Naturalism; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Paul Thagard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04282452025114893,"gpt":0.2420132347140211,"spread":0.1991887144628722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03044842,0.0004735644,0.0006574359,0.002430085,0.007436397,0.01438284,0.002861869,0.005629736,0.005673888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06645766,0.0006734729,0.001056826,0.001977338,0.04611234,0.01979806,0.01448317,0.005384764,0.0008516074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01035161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003931783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002680148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9574832,0.03360454,0.001217797,0.002084792,0.003824328,0.001785386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9359537,0.04085435,0.00498682,0.009805362,0.005056049,0.003343665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001850668,0.00004412175,0.000701045,0.0000817035,0.00001776221,0.0001908206,0.02405477,0.002140438,0.0003425436,0.9577322,0.00142139,0.01325482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002392339,0.0000264671,0.0004517911,0.0001547897,0.00001314835,0.0001204005,0.007245464,0.00334737,0.0004018091,0.954092,0.0340974,0.00002538204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08217559,0.001325972,0.4628376,0.0424035,0.0003297503,0.0003456106,0.00006744163,0.0002619596,0.4102526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448551,0.00050417,0.0476896,0.0008612085,0.00008413609,0.0002345218,0.00005641174,0.00007715889,0.005637694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1610286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914511293","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00091.x","title":"COHERENCE: THE PRICE IS RIGHT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Argument (complex analysis); Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Paul Thagard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04977269533428182,"gpt":0.2293918122958959,"spread":0.1796191169616141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01339234,0.0004056913,0.001096216,0.001250698,0.003753677,0.009679029,0.001313748,0.006039021,0.02648949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05591977,0.0004196723,0.0005482438,0.001576718,0.02657851,0.02748365,0.005077645,0.01142202,0.003320744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003938487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003643779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005208647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003756257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896162,0.004951301,0.0005173126,0.001287868,0.003018858,0.0006084982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9579158,0.02627402,0.001514471,0.006716974,0.006009313,0.00156945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002368602,0.000005472122,0.0001059987,0.00005488767,0.000009895862,0.00001751593,0.0003360389,0.0001107777,0.00004012276,0.9746974,0.01693249,0.007665783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002436324,0.000008239199,0.000155152,0.0001244252,0.00000630959,0.00002632765,0.0004173751,0.000193798,0.00005465244,0.9516135,0.04736601,0.000009871776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009417806,0.01393248,0.02403257,0.8144528,0.006142823,0.00003576863,0.0002943947,0.0001268816,0.1315644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8326374,0.01138747,0.01023479,0.09639667,0.01395348,0.0001598093,0.0002716524,0.0004048524,0.03455379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02648949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08861619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975675069","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00131.x","title":"On Cheering Charles Bronson: The Ethics of Vigilantism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Parade; Relevance (law); Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Travis Dumsday","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09622889416789544,"gpt":0.2767592872719903,"spread":0.1805303931040949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008158798,0.0002748582,0.0003248494,0.0008696706,0.006007313,0.00659994,0.0009758682,0.00719027,0.002855146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01006305,0.000251465,0.0002415875,0.0007051757,0.05093296,0.004897301,0.003077258,0.007160137,0.0003769649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005440364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004206975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01046006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009187923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944635,0.003734448,0.0001331442,0.0004133704,0.000802562,0.0004529933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945576,0.00378171,0.0003573333,0.0003178477,0.0007278153,0.0002577187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002856577,0.000002848571,0.00006346802,0.000009131898,0.000001259378,0.00004163089,0.001958566,0.00004875534,0.00002505312,0.9925775,0.004295739,0.0009732307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007361542,0.000006887254,0.0001804111,0.0001657467,0.000002973112,0.00005516988,0.001791877,0.0002408903,0.00009381823,0.9338317,0.06361205,0.00001101181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03315505,0.01833594,0.01237051,0.3593311,0.001269662,0.00005951602,0.00004053144,0.00004223813,0.5753954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9415499,0.0033092,0.002107976,0.02508901,0.0008531032,0.00006236459,0.000008409004,0.00003801267,0.02698191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01046006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0431484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087416828","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01809.x","title":"Aristotle's Theory of Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Analytic philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Dennis McKerlie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04856816800905384,"gpt":0.3098308887936929,"spread":0.2612627207846391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004580175,0.0009254347,0.001928956,0.004670972,0.009531512,0.007250072,0.001550433,0.009008225,0.006076212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005634832,0.0007988457,0.001273775,0.00249844,0.03315167,0.008802963,0.003465864,0.009425901,0.001769847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008439918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006329351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01049532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01329446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956774,0.00149909,0.0002537759,0.0005845316,0.001409919,0.0005752821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978514,0.001004592,0.0001562174,0.0002511671,0.0005818469,0.0001548603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001679371,0.0000021346,0.000008420142,0.00000730371,0.000001902668,0.000006711248,0.0001821017,0.00004741133,0.000005365738,0.9975715,0.001519583,0.0006458369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006305486,0.000003008646,0.00003127937,0.00001373315,0.000002336383,0.00001448525,0.0000419679,0.00008269184,0.00001745957,0.9879107,0.01187116,0.000004759685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007515504,0.005997184,0.06762736,0.03530819,0.002514745,0.00012456,0.0002366995,0.0001565615,0.8805192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7534103,0.004852525,0.04248855,0.01794822,0.004402267,0.0005749778,0.000120915,0.0001673421,0.1760347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01049532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06123614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1727638832","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00074.x","title":"IN DEFENSE OF THE WHAT‐IT‐IS‐LIKENESS OF EXPERIENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Phrase; Unconscious mind; Interpretation (philosophy); Hacker; Mental state; Consciousness; Subject (documents); Popularity; State (computer science); Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Computer science; Social psychology; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Greg Janzen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0657146296348593,"gpt":0.302250454041192,"spread":0.2365358244063327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005261713,0.0003338445,0.000511341,0.001124109,0.00310128,0.006212242,0.001625295,0.004034836,0.00641076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01289158,0.0003204938,0.0005371801,0.000834293,0.04199513,0.01276922,0.00521253,0.005717492,0.0006627723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001890889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009479097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001162821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006750231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958913,0.002176994,0.0001904452,0.0008702033,0.0006062625,0.0002647693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991057,0.004956953,0.00086005,0.001735171,0.001000058,0.0003906749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009807177,0.000003279946,0.0001546764,0.00002088567,0.0000037416,0.00006062369,0.002081158,0.00005583889,0.00007228328,0.9957654,0.0006816668,0.001090483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007312694,0.00001189062,0.0002951518,0.00004514771,0.000006572258,0.000167049,0.001483089,0.0003363368,0.0001056401,0.9826659,0.01486732,0.000008441724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06919683,0.002434352,0.07392453,0.093229,0.001420029,0.00004925665,0.0001522508,0.000142667,0.7594511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848973,0.000466859,0.002653438,0.004506608,0.0006450941,0.00004905893,0.0000521488,0.00006120494,0.006668375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00641076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02782696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052308120","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00048.x","title":"The Temporality of Life: Merleau‐Ponty, Bergson, and the Immemorial Past","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Alia Al‐Saji","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01786531883805733,"gpt":0.2143449238317373,"spread":0.19647960499368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001984741,0.0002893909,0.000244115,0.001127099,0.003636918,0.007460862,0.0006827214,0.001838593,0.004327802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00397183,0.0002053316,0.0001782861,0.001319389,0.02895955,0.01312983,0.002962519,0.002474058,0.0002296194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005714814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00234952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008100532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005666159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989064,0.0006335936,0.00002695158,0.0001514032,0.00015793,0.0001238055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981584,0.001146745,0.0002425588,0.0001106429,0.0001776662,0.0001640482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001099861,0.000004468572,0.000111279,0.00001896266,9.552359e-7,0.00007263484,0.0195267,0.00006528143,0.00003294537,0.9774629,0.000917299,0.001775646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001199761,0.00001797135,0.0005720797,0.0001886791,0.00000394442,0.000274163,0.03588682,0.00032007,0.0001268664,0.8300546,0.1325246,0.00001815333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.220449,0.03106884,0.02126978,0.08980234,0.00103082,0.00003613404,0.0001482113,0.00005818037,0.6361367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894739,0.002449228,0.0008661581,0.0006258505,0.0001195331,0.00001703074,0.00001407702,0.00001549404,0.006418841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008100532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04146409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109235385","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00127.x","title":"Puzzles about Trust","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Access Control and Trust","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Epistemology; Computational trust; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Reputation; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Doran Smolkin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.038166490388517,"gpt":0.2782668937827928,"spread":0.2401004033942758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009388492,0.0003750496,0.0007012693,0.00158744,0.004027035,0.007578116,0.0009170885,0.004175067,0.004889009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02944086,0.0003242491,0.0005470258,0.001532127,0.03213339,0.01558775,0.004552397,0.00507547,0.000443827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005116199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002425451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003778695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001474371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921538,0.004594649,0.0004124678,0.0007565364,0.001426419,0.0006561711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976675,0.01524858,0.002426165,0.002951157,0.001783661,0.0009153603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001628856,0.000004898904,0.0003160272,0.00002897138,0.00000752927,0.00006108462,0.002278046,0.0005483052,0.0000370837,0.9926179,0.001097056,0.002986875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007125204,0.000008987298,0.0001826541,0.0000428487,0.000006204445,0.00005697683,0.001019403,0.00130776,0.00004332493,0.9888262,0.008491672,0.000006985844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2315555,0.01372058,0.1361722,0.2554874,0.001100337,0.00009381131,0.0002259595,0.0001537993,0.3614904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940245,0.001198615,0.001718575,0.001060599,0.0001539428,0.00001905575,0.00002024203,0.00001264031,0.001791955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009388492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04965168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533970978","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00095.x","title":"WHEN THINKING HESITATES: PHILOSOPHY AS PROSTHESIS AND TRANSFORMATIVE VISION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Perception; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Temporality; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alia Al‐Saji","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03045471842992692,"gpt":0.2895109293833242,"spread":0.2590562109533973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009102637,0.0004494984,0.0004454612,0.00110917,0.00387035,0.01102958,0.0009812252,0.004216685,0.003057548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01063031,0.0003556586,0.0005344949,0.0006385701,0.06384808,0.0168305,0.006606336,0.00757514,0.0005701584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004461284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003028435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00117956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007397478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932647,0.004548771,0.000113585,0.0005400463,0.000996299,0.0005366921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948323,0.003164851,0.0004844604,0.0005569149,0.0005215128,0.0004400695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001255227,0.000008819772,0.0001209446,0.00001998808,0.000004156514,0.0001140648,0.03141436,0.0001385739,0.0001852609,0.9631767,0.001977026,0.00282771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001308136,0.00002325567,0.0001544558,0.00006599077,0.000005365479,0.0002036205,0.01838599,0.0006011052,0.0003074675,0.9366077,0.04361317,0.0000187553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1291041,0.008632014,0.1192258,0.1721221,0.00263361,0.00008590287,0.00004980223,0.0004368451,0.5677098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981949,0.000904794,0.004181493,0.004360163,0.0001939327,0.00003539934,0.000009341444,0.00009378984,0.008271954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01102958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04813993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009749450","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00158.x","title":"Theory to Practice and Practice to Theory? Lessons from Local NGO Empowerment Projects in Indonesia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"Empowerment; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Christine M. Koggel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09597409301164248,"gpt":0.4234417654821513,"spread":0.3274676724705088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02341858,0.0006360169,0.0006916153,0.0009369709,0.0127898,0.0116326,0.00274082,0.002845628,0.005722794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01737521,0.0006964759,0.0003357563,0.001694556,0.02430914,0.008336453,0.01157164,0.007815966,0.0006676869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01069799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02611477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00665856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01670913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9862141,0.01093704,0.0002561066,0.0004507255,0.0008569899,0.001285189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804818,0.01462169,0.0005670203,0.0008946866,0.0006480961,0.002786756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000822787,0.001590238,0.009113513,0.000690854,0.000009962235,0.001443431,0.7461531,0.0005459083,0.000429236,0.1179552,0.005197163,0.1167892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007631119,0.0002183744,0.006104695,0.001377079,0.00001535254,0.0003289121,0.9091195,0.0009644651,0.0005212055,0.04646991,0.03477839,0.00002580086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6262822,0.003061392,0.01300263,0.1003459,0.0005251951,0.001334101,0.00003427334,0.0001023284,0.255312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982918,0.001107217,0.004859369,0.001610062,0.00002741328,0.0004644884,0.000009748571,0.00003251529,0.008971274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02341858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1238508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396614204","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12560","title":"Touching the wounds of colonial duration: Fanon's anticolonial critical phenomenology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Colonialism; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Epistemology; Psychology; History","authors":[{"name":"Alia Al‐Saji","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04080310797357733,"gpt":0.3430075344025327,"spread":0.3022044264289554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004626438,0.0005572612,0.00036044,0.001482159,0.01046361,0.008306406,0.0009943231,0.002908514,0.003153063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008100057,0.0002418011,0.0002077381,0.00102307,0.05061288,0.01037884,0.004033085,0.00377306,0.000140486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008676642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002385978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01646809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01520146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963096,0.002794332,0.00005264521,0.0002394233,0.0002893245,0.0003146581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949773,0.003902605,0.0002814915,0.0001949951,0.0003337972,0.0003098642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003686444,0.00001932682,0.0007455141,0.00006653908,0.000002366318,0.0005465922,0.6457621,0.0001001396,0.0003075184,0.3433698,0.003795972,0.005247327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001831644,0.00007538321,0.002493846,0.0009279468,0.00000857123,0.00144176,0.6107631,0.0008120234,0.0006001943,0.1105913,0.2722003,0.00006722585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5335816,0.009289595,0.01662812,0.03950057,0.001087042,0.000141569,0.00007694514,0.00009437493,0.3996001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909536,0.0005559606,0.0006210191,0.001125097,0.00006112718,0.00003017655,0.00000652328,0.00001969112,0.006626864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01646809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06295377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042947784","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01982.x","title":"Comments on Sarah Broadie “Virtue and beyond in Plato and Aristotle”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Citation; Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Rachel Barney","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02784984231237978,"gpt":0.2264521178113312,"spread":0.1986022754989515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00869393,0.001494953,0.00250315,0.001990821,0.0171438,0.009574585,0.005393859,0.06305379,0.01356818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04353477,0.001263844,0.001695488,0.002737985,0.01500042,0.01352129,0.009214327,0.05830416,0.006151219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007904187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007241017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03982981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06827623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925553,0.001970636,0.0005618322,0.001743986,0.001953347,0.001214846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725463,0.01861575,0.001465335,0.0007967629,0.005347742,0.001228092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002644335,0.0000067107,0.00008225106,0.00005003511,0.000008635549,0.0001301928,0.00195879,0.0000303846,0.0000576637,0.01912741,0.9774359,0.001085603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003708501,0.00001556247,0.001199124,0.0005703934,0.00002833429,0.0001267257,0.005992449,0.0001624474,0.0003087803,0.02701161,0.9644568,0.0000906132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004469887,0.002190713,0.0001288317,0.9719355,0.01996254,0.000009411407,0.0000643914,0.00001617996,0.005245434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005212322,0.0008593502,0.0001097193,0.9633813,0.0194603,0.00003867553,0.0000214076,0.00004100195,0.01087592],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06305379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07919598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114070813","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00161.x","title":"Global Care Chains: Freedom, Responsibility, and Solidarity<sup>1</sup>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Allison Weir","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04088998789279767,"gpt":0.3114444896335405,"spread":0.2705545017407429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005388109,0.0003457369,0.0003355991,0.0007616488,0.004637036,0.01037356,0.000861466,0.005476103,0.009395346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008164075,0.0002300099,0.0003735122,0.001387699,0.0360043,0.0100399,0.005041079,0.005471464,0.0004377202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008971097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01043539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01525771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01634625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959857,0.002447453,0.000103086,0.0002911755,0.0006053611,0.0005672408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935983,0.00443453,0.0005081053,0.000388856,0.0005222865,0.0005479507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003596377,0.000001992954,0.00007813166,0.000007015806,9.838063e-7,0.00001206551,0.001271331,0.0000744689,0.000006307085,0.9956797,0.001681931,0.001182456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006224038,0.000005120413,0.0002555149,0.00006192354,0.000003618251,0.0000265517,0.003160742,0.0002733063,0.00005858963,0.9678315,0.02831095,0.000006087726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05426284,0.008201887,0.02287266,0.3264784,0.001477902,0.000082134,0.0001118323,0.00004959839,0.5864627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721867,0.002120447,0.002072494,0.006313768,0.0005606906,0.00008107768,0.00003051099,0.00002839918,0.01660594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01525771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06509018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078990544","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00098.x","title":"Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Economic Justice; Virtue; Denial; Law and economics; Law; Subject (documents); Collective responsibility; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Pablo Gilabert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04009014783141977,"gpt":0.2285022885758115,"spread":0.1884121407443917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006665117,0.0003907312,0.000473048,0.0006060844,0.004068261,0.004242768,0.001093264,0.003851071,0.003136883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005482217,0.0002430523,0.0005039272,0.0004074466,0.0289722,0.005423871,0.004994549,0.00553334,0.000634643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003523872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003981892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002234779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002936236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956325,0.002034502,0.0001468533,0.0004996504,0.001251437,0.0004350605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973406,0.001230749,0.0002561635,0.0004782511,0.0004378902,0.0002563084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002599294,0.000003694355,0.00004414488,0.000005318299,8.863544e-7,0.000009549914,0.0004021933,0.00005018779,0.00003259618,0.9980076,0.0004898022,0.0009514706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008408028,0.000009090631,0.0002081995,0.00002867561,0.00000215054,0.00003533929,0.000281551,0.0002336119,0.00009489121,0.9758459,0.02324624,0.000005795261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06173217,0.002023523,0.049844,0.06153321,0.0006007451,0.00006507918,0.00004854466,0.00006440741,0.8240883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384908,0.0007353505,0.00893221,0.008828811,0.0003117916,0.0001357156,0.00002487727,0.00005066361,0.04248986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006665117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03524888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011703803","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00132.x","title":"Free Love: A Hegelian Defense of Same‐Sex Marriage Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Duty; Institution; Mount; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jim Vernon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02495260672409235,"gpt":0.2778689694125014,"spread":0.2529163626884091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005494983,0.0002537927,0.0004456033,0.0009078248,0.003132293,0.004491008,0.0008578782,0.003209615,0.002918338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003109257,0.0001759615,0.0003829605,0.0004269451,0.05803932,0.004429507,0.004752021,0.005991338,0.0004497148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003551014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004473986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001987402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001943036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967519,0.001999693,0.00006986388,0.000258979,0.0006373255,0.0002822368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980425,0.001211621,0.0001265879,0.0002231986,0.0002148495,0.0001812091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002027522,0.00000245965,0.00001440453,0.00000332314,6.710396e-7,0.000007556277,0.0008316817,0.00004465912,0.0000183948,0.9982296,0.0003157895,0.0005294992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007824152,0.000008700456,0.00004813872,0.00003666646,0.000001831184,0.00003319882,0.0008201952,0.0001634811,0.00008864069,0.9749419,0.0238449,0.000004425247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.05669768,0.009749846,0.06044979,0.1143833,0.000857601,0.00006432076,0.00005193536,0.00006121039,0.7576844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948313,0.002648615,0.00604678,0.01059954,0.0004586916,0.00008620795,0.00001719181,0.00002263155,0.03180717],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005494983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0290606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493767296","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00121.x","title":"DERRIDA ON THE DEATH PENALTY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Deconstruction (building); Sovereignty; Abolitionism; Philosophy; Renunciation; Capital punishment; Politics; Reading (process); Punishment (psychology); Conscience; Law; Epistemology; Capital (architecture); Literature; Theology; Political science; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Art","authors":[{"name":"Matthias Fritsch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1195639480933679,"gpt":0.2740227496707496,"spread":0.1544588015773817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002162198,0.000333764,0.000352531,0.0005759471,0.003706589,0.003154534,0.0009637094,0.004381956,0.003984109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004241648,0.0001368417,0.0003057273,0.0002908341,0.01550644,0.002484722,0.005195385,0.005732284,0.00072271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006721276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002089472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009015256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005414979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978758,0.001095176,0.00007015443,0.0002821242,0.0003770449,0.0002996405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992213,0.0003619469,0.00006131402,0.00009794338,0.0001949783,0.00006248304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001348283,0.000005317602,0.00006955482,0.00001495323,0.000001815566,0.00005709627,0.002282754,0.0001450039,0.00009655117,0.9820784,0.01307261,0.002162503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001901946,0.00002150188,0.0003942391,0.0001912124,0.000005171778,0.0001050178,0.002166762,0.0003350593,0.0005905416,0.2999056,0.6962394,0.00002647282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0580719,0.01478894,0.006683583,0.2490634,0.004264722,0.00003797378,0.0001171483,0.0000799749,0.6668925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557334,0.002119685,0.0006336474,0.03050548,0.0008338341,0.00008839452,0.00003016005,0.00005655727,0.1099988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009015256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04876649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075924159","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00086.x","title":"Malebranche and Descartes on Method: Psychologism, Free Will, and Doubt","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Psychologism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Relation (database); Subject (documents); Cartesianism; Computer science; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"David Scott","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07650655209298385,"gpt":0.2516115422228375,"spread":0.1751049901298537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005130381,0.0003464162,0.0005076796,0.002125402,0.00281176,0.005070182,0.0006498345,0.003366939,0.002639486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01073778,0.0002297973,0.0003544423,0.001208818,0.03583101,0.004793965,0.00235578,0.00420391,0.0003740099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00515046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002075144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004851403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00386913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948586,0.003541796,0.0001193469,0.0002432892,0.001023066,0.0002139657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990714,0.007409599,0.0003305735,0.0005029094,0.000800258,0.0002426373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003273593,0.000001418617,0.00001890154,0.000008496369,8.42998e-7,0.00001692056,0.0007317643,0.000055369,0.00001047347,0.9966242,0.00152841,0.0009999725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004541158,0.000003178076,0.00007037881,0.0000351167,0.000001408734,0.00002567407,0.0003001304,0.0001303729,0.00004476169,0.9640207,0.03535887,0.000004966563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03091777,0.04612179,0.04079678,0.2127263,0.002617845,0.00005230898,0.00008749269,0.0000957235,0.6665839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941149,0.01029546,0.005153236,0.008113199,0.00222683,0.00006501173,0.00002735422,0.00007572273,0.03289418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00515046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03736943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394692283","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12554","title":"The concept of unlivability: A reading of Frantz Fanon's “The North African Syndrome” (1952)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Colonialism; Reading (process); Resistance (ecology); Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Gender studies; Anthropology; History; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Sujaya Dhanvantari","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0324209632371599,"gpt":0.2918188526448891,"spread":0.2593978894077292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00242237,0.0005668703,0.000364483,0.002172145,0.006116129,0.002612288,0.0008335098,0.003361834,0.001563999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004658454,0.0001991685,0.0001861015,0.0008123557,0.04813129,0.00657123,0.002614241,0.004375754,0.0001114554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006550305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002666958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01825345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01616943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983897,0.001094544,0.00003639644,0.0001177516,0.0002077979,0.0001538023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987693,0.0008606989,0.0001170965,0.00004544848,0.0001032378,0.000104172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002086921,0.00001597727,0.0006703219,0.00007034325,0.000003293715,0.001516013,0.137108,0.00009586646,0.0002174622,0.8319117,0.01726739,0.01110282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001784164,0.00004449243,0.003204653,0.001068087,0.000009018365,0.004883657,0.09651718,0.0002824351,0.0002590258,0.3502991,0.543367,0.00004746074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1312576,0.1063942,0.009920036,0.3767749,0.008309759,0.00009669307,0.0001080099,0.00007040624,0.3670684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623488,0.00990531,0.001568373,0.01315515,0.00130117,0.00009368634,0.00001787341,0.00002111179,0.01158851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01825345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04752606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100178732","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01944.x","title":"Foucault after Hyppolite: Toward an A-Theistic Theodicy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Multiculturalism; Theodicy; Philosophy; Criticism; History and philosophy of science; Art history; Classics; Epistemology; Theology; History; Law; Art; Literature; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Réal Fillion","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06604896464539492,"gpt":0.2710881779474994,"spread":0.2050392133021045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009288566,0.0005536487,0.0007315818,0.001746736,0.01165748,0.01041504,0.001391246,0.005322694,0.006264136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0146538,0.0003451434,0.0004601793,0.001037792,0.05462594,0.01123715,0.006230754,0.01474514,0.001495551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005964698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009111902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006613817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008696199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935818,0.004646314,0.0001384959,0.0004722007,0.0008140118,0.0003471559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928724,0.00400684,0.000349992,0.000911404,0.001168211,0.000691117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007868514,0.000007806507,0.00002713173,0.00001277611,0.000001290853,0.0000105118,0.002328397,0.00002943617,0.00002324772,0.9848124,0.009588446,0.00315067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001386507,0.000009592688,0.00007173989,0.00009918911,0.000003092419,0.00003550651,0.00226777,0.0002826847,0.0001288779,0.8240905,0.172987,0.00001018464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01052109,0.01272083,0.0696751,0.43775,0.01080781,0.00007818267,0.00006917254,0.0003165372,0.4580612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7277416,0.006010068,0.03708502,0.07763141,0.006378951,0.0003940095,0.00005984982,0.0009951602,0.143704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01165748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04912323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806049702","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12274","title":"The Birth of <i>Being and Time</i>: Heidegger's Pivotal 1921 Reading of Aristotle's <i>On the Soul</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Soul; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Ontology; Key (lock); Fundamental ontology; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Computer science; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Francisco J. González","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01959150973873131,"gpt":0.2555237630634463,"spread":0.235932253324715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001977368,0.0003405292,0.0002867299,0.0009841247,0.00304104,0.004738325,0.0004753087,0.001539513,0.002523802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001538613,0.0002215644,0.000190112,0.0004933783,0.02373425,0.004169421,0.001658059,0.003550538,0.0004379124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00520938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001614405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006206552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004696103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989393,0.0007078748,0.00001702118,0.0001160545,0.000136263,0.00008354062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992964,0.0004089325,0.00005766575,0.00005086971,0.0001059818,0.00008004814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106282,0.000005119658,0.00004664408,0.00001047064,0.000001031388,0.00002610103,0.008687879,0.00004863932,0.0001062684,0.9860805,0.003346725,0.001629848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001769436,0.00003783475,0.0008270447,0.000211215,0.00000530607,0.00009833268,0.007811217,0.0003245934,0.0004040919,0.7079986,0.282246,0.00001804178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06709763,0.03073934,0.01887343,0.05556424,0.002631724,0.000039877,0.00008114165,0.00008679117,0.8248858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293625,0.003880241,0.001882725,0.003480155,0.0005836128,0.00003073053,0.00002408706,0.00006423154,0.06069168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006206552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03779691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400546234","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12582","title":"Thoughts on the structure of the history of Africana philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Chike Jeffers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04648233115476529,"gpt":0.2561483734416115,"spread":0.2096660422868462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004652784,0.0002687745,0.0002862631,0.003052665,0.01020633,0.01013301,0.0006076851,0.001925271,0.00748069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006110169,0.00027509,0.0001756429,0.00245862,0.02201673,0.009071461,0.004149005,0.006537611,0.0003526065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01042241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003983189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007002174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007128205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977653,0.001482499,0.00004831424,0.0001561222,0.0002690836,0.0002787793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973146,0.001892971,0.0002024472,0.0001346454,0.000257014,0.0001981982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001586511,0.000006785822,0.0001468058,0.00004079524,0.000001824261,0.0001008529,0.02597268,0.00006090332,0.00008623561,0.9607994,0.007390015,0.005377802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001384524,0.00002403916,0.001484185,0.0007738437,0.000004969449,0.0001647083,0.03296323,0.0002230191,0.0003025655,0.242979,0.7210481,0.00001858359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09060873,0.08209046,0.004978893,0.2471429,0.00707551,0.00004249678,0.0001633198,0.00007049901,0.5678272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340856,0.01274439,0.001065578,0.006694891,0.002146135,0.00004919028,0.00003784101,0.00005996949,0.04311643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01042241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07562023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406098040","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12612","title":"A common measure: Hobbes on the epistemic functions of public reason","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Sovereignty; Epistemology; Politics; Measure (data warehouse); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Amy M. Schmitter","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08143138602242155,"gpt":0.2541070526870265,"spread":0.1726756666646049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01426526,0.0006848723,0.001067564,0.003196929,0.006128997,0.01075926,0.001141611,0.004841569,0.004476588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01798912,0.0005089714,0.001097475,0.001979223,0.05579231,0.01554893,0.006742202,0.006740759,0.001009971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00729148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002658489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002427357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001440476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874681,0.008767893,0.0003819913,0.00110138,0.001689196,0.0005913766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868916,0.008716092,0.0005604055,0.001811235,0.001461684,0.0005591249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001883913,0.000001617564,0.000007212175,0.000003036359,0.000001016416,0.000005233495,0.000253156,0.00005516637,0.000008251949,0.9990276,0.0002726932,0.0003630678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002935508,0.000002086297,0.00001268188,0.00001586354,0.000001355982,0.00000525806,0.0001103072,0.0001347857,0.00002027176,0.996035,0.003656483,0.000002830787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02753841,0.010341,0.2346707,0.07368524,0.001532786,0.00008394699,0.0001140755,0.0001345174,0.6518992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588231,0.001881996,0.01836628,0.003464466,0.001098045,0.0001575555,0.00004276588,0.0001101787,0.01605555],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01426526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07544279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388133135","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12545","title":"Heidegger's fundamental ontology and the human good in Aristotelian ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Existentialism; Naturalism; Ontology; Rationality; Parallels; GRASP; Analytic philosophy; Character (mathematics); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"John Hacker‐Wright","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08482429848669673,"gpt":0.29481864546611,"spread":0.2099943469794133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005174558,0.0003837089,0.00053742,0.001501207,0.004088388,0.004720887,0.0008655644,0.003328753,0.001732096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003453176,0.0002650551,0.0004192355,0.0009498562,0.04399875,0.005956092,0.002956992,0.003517632,0.0002677206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008740503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005482339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006377609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005076156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961158,0.002547459,0.0001020857,0.0002800547,0.0006840417,0.0002704396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978238,0.001298266,0.0001671526,0.0002528536,0.000271249,0.0001867457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[9.387538e-7,0.000001968652,0.00001155098,0.000003134003,4.167479e-7,0.000004555,0.0004695921,0.00007515876,0.000009918132,0.9988059,0.0002680041,0.0003489063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002466202,0.000001966254,0.00003040216,0.00001170813,7.310828e-7,0.000007984744,0.0001815695,0.0002230127,0.00001769744,0.992825,0.006695311,0.000002070415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07986833,0.011499,0.1243101,0.07966087,0.0007209922,0.0001080279,0.0001288768,0.000117146,0.7035866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685702,0.001611291,0.01123065,0.002282782,0.0002511826,0.00009282181,0.00002319652,0.00002992965,0.01590808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008740503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06341708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110946410","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00015.x","title":"Agent Reliabilism, Subjective Justification, and Epistemic Credit","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Christine McKinnon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0411197691073327,"gpt":0.2391962339446754,"spread":0.1980764648373427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01444202,0.0004384274,0.0009314167,0.002127816,0.001974697,0.005750862,0.001561812,0.004628195,0.005932532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04407338,0.0003786462,0.0006229734,0.001386175,0.02170278,0.00827287,0.004278895,0.004911664,0.0004531431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003310293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002440528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002281103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002089758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915863,0.005265355,0.0003369916,0.0007503059,0.001547485,0.0005135597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9445795,0.03941082,0.003611295,0.005794371,0.005239468,0.001364445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007540055,0.000009154041,0.0001996295,0.00001579697,0.000005992807,0.00002608609,0.0002406288,0.0005801757,0.00003633076,0.9969657,0.0003373481,0.001575754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001061826,0.000004235311,0.0001477142,0.00002403264,0.000003585375,0.00001869791,0.00006021017,0.001726879,0.0000685167,0.9957322,0.002197306,0.000005863783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1745213,0.003747618,0.369969,0.05680338,0.0005149693,0.0001605409,0.0002105486,0.000301401,0.3937713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901265,0.0002330429,0.006165445,0.0005644244,0.0001432676,0.00005430476,0.00002292695,0.00002991983,0.00266026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01444202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07637763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942090137","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12080","title":"Some Features of Promises and their Obligations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Moral obligation; Normative; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael G. Pratt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02722561487486898,"gpt":0.2298875999991912,"spread":0.2026619851243222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004701448,0.000201932,0.0003057661,0.001112272,0.00289859,0.004151194,0.001014109,0.002406614,0.009267698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115783,0.0004196289,0.0005703489,0.000956442,0.008242363,0.01265725,0.003344466,0.002547551,0.0008211296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002287787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001005288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001172514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007800277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968749,0.001498423,0.000136613,0.0003022786,0.0008297547,0.0003579104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935408,0.003889327,0.0006841903,0.0007325623,0.0008379027,0.0003150884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006660584,0.000002733691,0.00008532013,0.000007561624,0.00000100201,0.00003660161,0.0006737879,0.0001010247,0.0001025616,0.9976421,0.0003077126,0.001032891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007268561,0.00001124133,0.000298528,0.00002056275,0.000003566767,0.00009663368,0.0005029783,0.001103854,0.000133298,0.9889691,0.00884534,0.000007557213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1930099,0.001822668,0.147703,0.01976787,0.0002576452,0.0001103458,0.000226521,0.0002319497,0.63687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838657,0.0003445509,0.006025852,0.0003433446,0.0001415086,0.00007369093,0.00004202079,0.00004289455,0.009120376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009267698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03100348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010343456","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00057.x","title":"The <i>Meno's</i> Metaphilosophical Examples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Contrast (vision); Epistemology; Philosophy; Key (lock); Sketch; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Matthew J. King","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04833043365752451,"gpt":0.2417534965416718,"spread":0.1934230628841473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002095048,0.0004018705,0.0002993993,0.001273131,0.003454735,0.00387033,0.0008836695,0.001616157,0.005199912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005205875,0.0001923458,0.0003018432,0.0009030883,0.01784574,0.003779009,0.002264991,0.002848145,0.0007686569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00244257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000891864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003208827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003646439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977846,0.001499869,0.00005350747,0.0001226301,0.0003902691,0.0001492473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985911,0.0007379795,0.0001378241,0.0001968921,0.0002427832,0.00009340472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005376809,0.00000364717,0.00004622326,0.00001653027,0.000001126361,0.00002931647,0.002125396,0.00005027422,0.00005226894,0.9937708,0.00259388,0.001305129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001512068,0.00001314225,0.0004275184,0.0001946796,0.000006134533,0.00018043,0.003794625,0.001227019,0.0005422874,0.7248153,0.2687677,0.00001603508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02459112,0.003808799,0.02994977,0.03271383,0.0008505891,0.0000343724,0.00009014397,0.0001079715,0.9078535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602259,0.001285683,0.005728479,0.002600521,0.0005894855,0.00007351558,0.00004197189,0.00006714896,0.02938721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005199912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01772213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380356787","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12522","title":"Expressing and receiving negative emotions: Comments on Myisha Cherry's <i>The Case for Rage</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rage (emotion); Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Nicolas Bommarito","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09392404286219735,"gpt":0.3515936713885609,"spread":0.2576696285263635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006991768,0.0008065819,0.0008784534,0.0005962708,0.01168512,0.007979429,0.001923261,0.01254918,0.002970684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0205734,0.000413679,0.0007090623,0.0005013747,0.02283713,0.005692772,0.004249304,0.02786366,0.0007075004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005023428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001540984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00583058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006992241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928046,0.00520979,0.0001327216,0.0003553527,0.001011802,0.0004857788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819824,0.01445484,0.000829068,0.0002961635,0.001602352,0.000835243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001789795,0.00008491571,0.0008325019,0.0002503719,0.0000320698,0.005157737,0.469269,0.000298377,0.002075772,0.1724544,0.3410236,0.008342304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003085413,0.0001369316,0.001961899,0.0005856103,0.0000212535,0.001852553,0.4476154,0.0005604579,0.0008700822,0.01762171,0.5286393,0.0001038613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.06179584,0.005741445,0.0023063,0.8202748,0.02648176,0.00006425265,0.00006205401,0.00009808923,0.08317559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6655428,0.004339629,0.001272535,0.2393191,0.01908966,0.0001634823,0.00003999566,0.0003340387,0.06989893],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01254918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03697646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395075826","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12568","title":"The young Leibniz's tentative acceptance of physical occasionalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Christian Henkel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04036566334219853,"gpt":0.259916670611993,"spread":0.2195510072697945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004976158,0.000231934,0.0002654962,0.001350148,0.002937914,0.004787813,0.000718774,0.002475048,0.001749292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00734616,0.0002028803,0.0002455527,0.0006471099,0.03150754,0.005228898,0.00291628,0.003370729,0.0002944104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003606715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001806086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004008404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00257198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980687,0.0009592626,0.00007122826,0.0002959496,0.0004368682,0.0001679532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969175,0.002132355,0.0002171764,0.0002290972,0.0003576721,0.0001462744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005496096,0.000001486374,0.00008305725,0.000008140453,0.000001050168,0.00003101058,0.002099057,0.00004273664,0.00004607257,0.995385,0.0009550893,0.001341782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001055215,0.00001652823,0.0005687368,0.0001169908,0.000005890625,0.0001244366,0.002451928,0.000464372,0.0002916711,0.8612029,0.1347285,0.00001750444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.169912,0.0234948,0.03508669,0.1480276,0.003168365,0.00003474297,0.0001018672,0.0001692647,0.6200047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827559,0.001937152,0.00125715,0.002583609,0.0007212764,0.00001386244,0.00001006339,0.00003165832,0.01068926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0263167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100959722","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00045.x","title":"Yielding Actuality: Trust and Reason in Gillian Rose's Vision of Community","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Equivocation; Rationality; Epistemology; Friendship; Alterity; Sociology; Impossibility; Conviction; Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Robin Lathangue","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.041607044259081,"gpt":0.3280487834047635,"spread":0.2864417391456825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008836702,0.0003701988,0.0004396497,0.001419843,0.00982183,0.01139515,0.001605179,0.005193661,0.0021019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01009254,0.0002744047,0.0004510085,0.0008216563,0.07729761,0.01180265,0.007031668,0.005819115,0.0002495847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01155724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004485107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02015839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01986287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911404,0.00650476,0.0001456094,0.0006005103,0.0009689098,0.0006399225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951338,0.003039267,0.0003776483,0.0004641426,0.0005368692,0.0004482039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000910798,0.000004321583,0.00006855969,0.00001251414,0.000001864211,0.00008415512,0.03136542,0.0001610329,0.00004169904,0.9656645,0.001434341,0.001152416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002127599,0.00001824566,0.0002063354,0.00008856225,0.000008800191,0.0001585298,0.0309617,0.0007030572,0.0001592756,0.8714933,0.09615041,0.00003045437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1640897,0.007131887,0.03141079,0.3007475,0.0008388559,0.00008217563,0.00005227911,0.000118737,0.4955279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992229,0.0003926389,0.001235306,0.001764597,0.00007837873,0.00001879689,0.000004007795,0.00001779236,0.004259408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02015839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08385414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987355271","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00007.x","title":"Epistemic Side Constraints and the Structure of Epistemic Normativity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Rationality; Constraint (computer-aided design); Order (exchange); Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Economics; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Zachary A. Silver","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02369998707612051,"gpt":0.2223327275725654,"spread":0.1986327404964449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009499939,0.0005059699,0.0007826411,0.001445649,0.003469039,0.006003183,0.001436625,0.002671095,0.006063005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01442271,0.0005405528,0.0008207071,0.001333331,0.01695412,0.01186772,0.005781919,0.004984454,0.0007725806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001978874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002527613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006509883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007192526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881768,0.006617328,0.0006043679,0.001272602,0.002603024,0.0007259172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842581,0.008899041,0.001212039,0.002578355,0.00241282,0.0006396908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005396293,0.000002973456,0.00004235896,0.000009723809,0.000002311716,0.0000137236,0.0002488821,0.000165511,0.00008667911,0.9984758,0.0001147156,0.0008319111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006914779,0.000004899928,0.00003496523,0.00001352186,0.000002414995,0.00001424879,0.00009009276,0.0006953273,0.0001383042,0.9960537,0.002941485,0.00000420613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05978231,0.0009125784,0.5849089,0.01051729,0.0004171742,0.0001194546,0.0001815454,0.000184944,0.3429757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9306294,0.000409791,0.05914726,0.001047672,0.0003205746,0.0002812142,0.0001190561,0.0001022507,0.007942748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009499939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05024105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104601679","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00088.x","title":"The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Wright; Epistemology; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Medicine; Art history","authors":[{"name":"Ken Levy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06441762251572031,"gpt":0.2627732214660006,"spread":0.1983555989502803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005818589,0.0003551026,0.0008527312,0.0008692945,0.002869733,0.003953392,0.0016106,0.005774229,0.0143024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03397998,0.0003878693,0.0006114711,0.0006925942,0.01021516,0.008999749,0.006801357,0.005984371,0.001372024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002175489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002822809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009887114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955322,0.00213037,0.0002063977,0.0005581066,0.001112777,0.0004601445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868544,0.006792095,0.0008779562,0.002436412,0.001944222,0.001094858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003286777,0.00001827496,0.0002405751,0.00003213605,0.000005167787,0.0002170217,0.0003972015,0.000386366,0.0001272103,0.9868542,0.006569873,0.005119097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001748204,0.000008783742,0.0001082222,0.00002014561,0.000002878503,0.0001228863,0.0002643472,0.0009882291,0.0001233832,0.9850043,0.01333049,0.000008677204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1403267,0.002934795,0.2022034,0.2001836,0.003517488,0.0001034032,0.0002771893,0.0009154938,0.4495381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630941,0.0005774305,0.009987081,0.007558415,0.0006763848,0.00006569634,0.00006254051,0.0001339163,0.01784448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0143024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04784632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366683289","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12510","title":"Raging better: Reflections on the Myisha Cherry's <i>The Case for Rage</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rage (emotion); Typology; Argument (complex analysis); Anger; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Alice MacLachlan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1463727223916758,"gpt":0.3781314620560827,"spread":0.2317587396644069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01057879,0.0007304943,0.001052494,0.001004047,0.02262528,0.01355464,0.002153059,0.01226574,0.004537286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0171273,0.0006509883,0.0006573554,0.0007090313,0.05107843,0.01022197,0.01125678,0.02854247,0.0009733847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008320254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003312284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005521179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008090124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883223,0.008505727,0.0001263946,0.0007301218,0.001074269,0.001241165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887649,0.008420344,0.0005826417,0.0003978347,0.000842375,0.0009919363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004249595,0.00006055448,0.0002464614,0.00009286778,0.00001111354,0.001326193,0.5587476,0.0001048919,0.0005560506,0.3514464,0.08211818,0.005247218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001896463,0.00005365213,0.0004695985,0.0004277234,0.00001043617,0.0009560556,0.4554554,0.0003102627,0.0004787827,0.06638775,0.4753797,0.00005163692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.09229838,0.01242289,0.004407693,0.7681354,0.006374439,0.00005239702,0.0000336362,0.0001092534,0.1161659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8707818,0.003227868,0.001397672,0.08529487,0.002295743,0.00008357455,0.00001007132,0.0002568434,0.03665158],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02262528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401549937","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12586","title":"Preparing the particular: Kant on the imagination's role in judgment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Imagination; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Dunn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03284837201702968,"gpt":0.2469954790419108,"spread":0.2141471070248812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006877382,0.0003389767,0.0003416328,0.001170597,0.003400729,0.008273241,0.0006777722,0.003038989,0.002640774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008880009,0.0002685476,0.0003273411,0.0007746794,0.03946762,0.008263642,0.003856413,0.006210903,0.0005470432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003270639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002402206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002338802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001978788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937865,0.004772732,0.0001270796,0.0002820217,0.0006145527,0.0004171935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923277,0.005876782,0.0003053414,0.0004686851,0.0006121373,0.0004092497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001499948,0.000006301266,0.00009366471,0.00002397259,0.000003415103,0.00007340471,0.006214219,0.000248782,0.0001000156,0.9875886,0.002652272,0.002980291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008161809,0.000005879146,0.0001455811,0.00006274653,0.000003531077,0.00003409649,0.002701117,0.0002764502,0.0001474345,0.9779152,0.01868914,0.00001076817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09750488,0.01801375,0.04306322,0.2014959,0.001199578,0.0000411826,0.00007819453,0.0001336747,0.6384696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862766,0.001833115,0.002274762,0.003426497,0.0002968975,0.0000129268,0.000009578806,0.00003290466,0.005836667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008273241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03637147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}