{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":32,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":32,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"9bb96700732d","filters":{"venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy"}},"results":[{"id":"W2158332646","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00038.x","title":"How to Collaborate: Procedural Knowledge in the Cooperative Development of Science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Scarcity; Knowledge management; Descriptive knowledge; Naturalism; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Paul Thagard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04282452025114893,"gpt":0.2420132347140211,"spread":0.1991887144628722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00139425,0.0001160336,0.0001814444,0.0002252981,0.0007833137,0.0001755248,0.001033767,0.00001468886,0.00003177011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005017675,0.0000575525,0.00005022182,0.0004126027,0.002011131,0.0003280234,0.00004515339,0.0001793724,0.00002777682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000727325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005433189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001098297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987679,0.00007611654,0.0003609624,0.0001135624,0.0004931361,0.0001883818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987914,0.00005379324,0.0002826199,0.0001442113,0.0006815889,0.0000463884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009368638,0.0002280145,0.00002795235,0.00002063376,0.00001227251,0.000005712584,0.5697923,0.00008003114,0.004924722,0.4235467,0.0008999531,0.0003679439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002323916,0.001785843,0.00128982,0.0007863358,0.00008819137,0.00009100397,0.3354714,0.00006044747,0.01023559,0.3311688,0.3157299,0.000968822],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9134485,0.000586497,0.00002508044,0.01648027,0.0004103,0.0002575721,0.00001945985,0.000006455801,0.06876587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981564,7.588191e-7,0.000136936,0.0003019882,0.0007532329,0.000004584416,2.323172e-7,0.000006202898,0.0006396769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3148299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7410098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914511293","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00091.x","title":"COHERENCE: THE PRICE IS RIGHT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Argument (complex analysis); Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Paul Thagard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04977269533428182,"gpt":0.2293918122958959,"spread":0.1796191169616141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010482,0.0001350088,0.0001657072,0.00005800378,0.000997846,0.0001014508,0.0009241775,0.00002707044,0.00374134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002432917,0.00005901211,0.0002004291,0.00005820549,0.001120247,0.0004157332,0.00004618775,0.0003840768,0.0007816554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002942398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004220328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001280642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003394975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987637,0.0001080359,0.0003149538,0.00007444942,0.0004781573,0.0002607302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989207,0.0001068641,0.0004245509,0.0002717797,0.0001656707,0.0001104803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007030847,0.0001577181,0.0001146137,0.00001367318,0.0001120019,0.000004993355,0.4221076,0.000003365901,0.0002822173,0.5602044,0.01631496,0.0006140455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002515757,0.0001478384,0.0000851111,0.00004712128,0.00008120068,0.0000709127,0.006496992,0.000002598751,0.0001072072,0.4651613,0.5273856,0.0001625026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1741904,0.006645778,0.00002256248,0.05173554,0.003360393,0.000223638,0.00006236783,0.00003387134,0.7637254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870384,0.000009316743,0.00001712933,0.002770109,0.006697832,0.000001840423,1.920572e-7,0.00001229492,0.003452837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.812848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975675069","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00131.x","title":"On Cheering Charles Bronson: The Ethics of Vigilantism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Parade; Relevance (law); Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Travis Dumsday","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09622889416789544,"gpt":0.2767592872719903,"spread":0.1805303931040949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001194046,0.000105244,0.0001702708,0.00005614674,0.000388611,0.00006492668,0.0004097012,0.00006177279,0.0001421601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001287221,0.0000525168,0.0001587436,0.00002738391,0.0003431138,0.00008152817,0.00001224994,0.0008515961,0.00005077513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001218912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003302628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001351507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001224506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989275,0.0001648958,0.0003498425,0.00006660145,0.0003787726,0.000112395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987265,0.0003128373,0.0004768609,0.0002314696,0.0002213405,0.00003096893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007014439,0.0000503275,0.000002634045,0.00001919354,0.00003588609,0.000002386266,0.1610412,0.00006587176,0.0006704269,0.8367801,0.000219604,0.001042243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003302734,0.0003275366,0.00009788686,0.0003088836,0.00009654387,0.00002468731,0.01279788,0.00002897942,0.0009533406,0.9703205,0.01458959,0.0001239022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5629746,0.004810172,0.0005943173,0.3170459,0.002097984,0.0003986305,0.0001156141,0.000064543,0.1118982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960421,0.0001043058,0.00002090889,0.001374034,0.002060564,4.422243e-7,8.158033e-7,0.00001178991,0.000384985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4330675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3699809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087416828","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01809.x","title":"Aristotle's Theory of Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Analytic philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Dennis McKerlie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04856816800905384,"gpt":0.3098308887936929,"spread":0.2612627207846391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001421053,0.00005209564,0.0001157881,0.00003468388,0.0002954837,0.00001780763,0.0004872891,0.0000350301,0.0002557117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001490856,0.00003183812,0.0001246593,0.00017931,0.000318545,0.00006747896,0.00002620184,0.0001767079,0.00006780656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002186909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009254061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007221137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001517352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990828,0.0002012566,0.0002530183,0.00004668469,0.0003025321,0.0001136822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990512,0.0002116103,0.0003498208,0.0001508617,0.0001688843,0.00006762642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006903289,0.00007272866,0.0002745831,0.000005717206,0.00004035826,0.000004150872,0.02630227,0.00005502006,0.000304634,0.9701928,0.000120698,0.002558029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001912738,0.00004263771,0.000199961,0.00002479799,0.0001198076,0.00001112634,0.01401409,0.000003880002,0.00003846579,0.9236223,0.06167487,0.00005681473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4539325,0.001268374,0.003521304,0.03775445,0.0004056326,0.0002057036,0.00002486527,0.00002378726,0.5028633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978167,0.00009627337,0.0001176284,0.0002304822,0.001107869,7.326094e-7,1.278066e-7,0.000007094596,0.0006230746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5438842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2799863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1727638832","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00074.x","title":"IN DEFENSE OF THE WHAT‐IT‐IS‐LIKENESS OF EXPERIENCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Phrase; Unconscious mind; Interpretation (philosophy); Hacker; Mental state; Consciousness; Subject (documents); Popularity; State (computer science); Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Computer science; Social psychology; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Greg Janzen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0657146296348593,"gpt":0.302250454041192,"spread":0.2365358244063327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009775102,0.0001295132,0.0002892844,0.00007918017,0.00005767515,0.000008764764,0.001396962,0.00007769528,0.001029642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008307999,0.00006488447,0.00024118,0.0004208895,0.001274577,0.0002082505,0.0001065224,0.0003276679,0.00004211707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001303989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003825954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003890185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002195365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982517,0.0003618544,0.0006367663,0.0001365312,0.0003955595,0.0002176178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984348,0.0001636919,0.0006568499,0.0005395395,0.0001322433,0.00007291151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006646801,0.0003968049,0.002216434,0.00001423447,0.0000639714,0.00002481363,0.2229077,0.000006365477,0.001686506,0.7713786,0.00003559009,0.0006042174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005221988,0.0001972388,0.001475783,0.0001860198,0.00002948464,0.00007259671,0.009153286,0.000002817652,0.005298808,0.9829025,0.00007035898,0.00008895165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048996,0.0006261038,0.00006383884,0.004990684,0.0009034137,0.0001215156,0.00001222282,0.000002876824,0.08837977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986214,0.00001770412,0.00004038342,0.001091838,0.0001659417,0.000002551172,3.062005e-8,0.00001074654,0.00004939991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2137544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052308120","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00048.x","title":"The Temporality of Life: Merleau‐Ponty, Bergson, and the Immemorial Past","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Alia Al‐Saji","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01786531883805733,"gpt":0.2143449238317373,"spread":0.19647960499368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004227306,0.0001820614,0.0004467423,0.000051988,0.0007651892,0.0001193925,0.0006887124,0.00004914207,0.0002327605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002746773,0.00006378537,0.0004583295,0.00008772813,0.003805931,0.00008316989,0.0001185886,0.0004735973,0.00002336891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001092755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002950715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001038541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006923507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978325,0.0003735916,0.0008866434,0.0001115193,0.0005523812,0.0002433734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972807,0.001202431,0.0007284691,0.0003215231,0.0003273464,0.0001395814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001697467,0.00006147208,0.00009795511,0.00001052093,0.0004218347,0.000004062592,0.01134365,0.000002278998,0.00002240614,0.9852691,0.0001412711,0.0009279624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00129835,0.0001300554,0.00006054183,0.0000283688,0.0002799359,0.00001133127,0.003464333,0.00001620764,0.00003203056,0.9850553,0.009526803,0.00009670139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6695794,0.005976691,0.0001913841,0.232643,0.001608408,0.0004079166,0.00009947124,0.00002668469,0.08946705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991581,0.00006250187,0.00000678848,0.0006403158,0.007472906,0.000001218258,6.561259e-7,0.00001592703,0.0002186586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3220016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109235385","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00127.x","title":"Puzzles about Trust","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Access Control and Trust","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Epistemology; Computational trust; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Reputation; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Doran Smolkin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.038166490388517,"gpt":0.2782668937827928,"spread":0.2401004033942758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007670535,0.0000913691,0.0001940355,0.00006156912,0.0008319409,0.0000431401,0.0006867065,0.00005611308,0.0003676517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001360216,0.00005322193,0.0002105727,0.0001700034,0.0005800036,0.0001949085,0.0000267696,0.0002606867,0.0001976611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002859943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001712314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001532084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003274085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986914,0.0002133726,0.0002941713,0.00006908103,0.0005213153,0.0002106639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990968,0.0001121067,0.0003460204,0.0001402064,0.000183953,0.0001209199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001036215,0.0005529177,0.07706797,0.00002628112,0.0008447601,0.0006388021,0.3867708,0.0002374969,0.000393959,0.4932994,0.005690724,0.03344068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003422255,0.0003612851,0.01237026,0.0001516479,0.0002549756,0.0003265975,0.02617243,0.00003089728,0.000088464,0.7627584,0.1934323,0.0006304857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7935263,0.002969971,0.0001857739,0.02852179,0.0006774368,0.0001450986,0.00001356577,0.00003713098,0.1739229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949303,0.0002100648,0.00005416072,0.0004374295,0.003200331,0.000001009464,1.578882e-7,0.00001172984,0.001154804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3605984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533970978","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00095.x","title":"WHEN THINKING HESITATES: PHILOSOPHY AS PROSTHESIS AND TRANSFORMATIVE VISION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Perception; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Temporality; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Alia Al‐Saji","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03045471842992692,"gpt":0.2895109293833242,"spread":0.2590562109533973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001563994,0.0003240914,0.0004827962,0.0002218138,0.0004501479,0.0000508499,0.0006193891,0.0001931065,0.000551227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004202914,0.0002041059,0.000281796,0.0001645966,0.0005021337,0.000583094,0.00007549355,0.0007524439,0.0008536591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003869861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002647652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001260122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.98728e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976475,0.0005357764,0.0006928326,0.0001930243,0.000419704,0.0005111661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983892,0.0002445931,0.0006170127,0.0003671306,0.000132765,0.0002493121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002931855,0.000914511,0.002911587,0.00009709383,0.001723789,0.0000682809,0.4441954,0.00000843384,0.0006832068,0.5385332,0.0006987487,0.00723381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001297552,0.0008451634,0.0009347168,0.0001370086,0.0002554972,0.0005640678,0.004680188,0.000001661131,0.00009980782,0.9891806,0.00174347,0.0002602531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7681936,0.01200212,0.0003672873,0.04431929,0.001479767,0.0005835908,0.0000472221,0.0000788849,0.1729282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953691,0.00004213748,0.0002576917,0.001900228,0.002213357,0.000009406704,0.000002360521,0.00005122869,0.0001545054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4506474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009749450","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00158.x","title":"Theory to Practice and Practice to Theory? Lessons from Local NGO Empowerment Projects in Indonesia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"Empowerment; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Christine M. Koggel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09597409301164248,"gpt":0.4234417654821513,"spread":0.3274676724705088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008607182,0.0002265222,0.0004269693,0.0002845354,0.0009115249,0.00001512732,0.000523204,0.0001352917,0.00009622022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004291669,0.0001500217,0.00006300957,0.0004314082,0.0001282546,0.0002458393,0.0003642906,0.001713441,0.0003673951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002965289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001185856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005401735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001203302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913031,0.006465437,0.0009466895,0.0002058928,0.0005762685,0.000502586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886376,0.009223026,0.0007004127,0.000487958,0.0004563293,0.0004947312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02112337,0.0008683848,0.004416965,0.0001063602,0.0002506301,0.0004320346,0.9155728,0.00009028012,0.0001680784,0.0321227,0.0026314,0.02221701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006541137,0.001756526,0.04121802,0.002059989,0.000239582,0.0008965076,0.5910415,0.0000103612,0.00003900201,0.2217653,0.1336601,0.0007719533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7329805,0.001121649,0.005459772,0.2483372,0.0006507118,0.001805109,0.00003586893,0.00002942221,0.009579782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551692,0.0001762449,0.003938327,0.03989915,0.0005453888,0.00005362925,0.000001754441,0.00003891412,0.000177378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3245313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7444144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396614204","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12560","title":"Touching the wounds of colonial duration: Fanon's anticolonial critical phenomenology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Colonialism; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Epistemology; Psychology; History","authors":[{"name":"Alia Al‐Saji","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04080310797357733,"gpt":0.3430075344025327,"spread":0.3022044264289554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001026329,0.00009241786,0.0002247935,0.00003627684,0.001026474,0.00008963333,0.0004554137,0.00008347823,0.0006363134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003818452,0.00004215167,0.0001849375,0.0002164434,0.002475839,0.0001107885,0.0000673964,0.0003873045,0.00003911161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005032137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001335071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001763841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008612314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998502,0.0004035606,0.0003928231,0.00009288442,0.0003903729,0.0002183198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987621,0.0007608202,0.0001587774,0.0000979061,0.0001665345,0.00005390141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001110525,0.00006492687,0.0001204287,0.00001321831,0.0001481194,0.00003929526,0.0689016,0.000008307858,0.0002336089,0.927393,0.0005421015,0.00242436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003763781,0.00120728,0.0003346428,0.0001279191,0.0002290845,0.00005789163,0.04110865,0.00006896332,0.00006765911,0.8549726,0.1012579,0.0001910731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5449787,0.006883333,0.000928611,0.3913597,0.003288268,0.0002244628,0.00002012152,0.00003634373,0.05228044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954332,0.0002179882,0.00005064153,0.0003726066,0.003806603,0.00000147061,1.351701e-7,0.000007443792,0.0001099893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4504544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9122331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042947784","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01982.x","title":"Comments on Sarah Broadie “Virtue and beyond in Plato and Aristotle”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Citation; Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Rachel Barney","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02784984231237978,"gpt":0.2264521178113312,"spread":0.1986022754989515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000323114,0.00015257,0.0002469972,0.0001114785,0.0002161696,0.00008327795,0.0001728501,0.00004145509,0.0001220879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002290463,0.00009313307,0.00007543573,0.00002962207,0.0003645532,0.0001437432,0.0000479393,0.0004359611,0.00005268918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002559118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001027864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001130505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005187899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991077,0.0000864454,0.0003433251,0.000111813,0.0002067423,0.0001439529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993744,0.0001610829,0.000198684,0.0001335927,0.00003758222,0.00009463666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004495865,0.000294406,0.0003116886,0.00001883317,0.0001026536,0.00003104628,0.03593855,0.00002305316,0.00004754342,0.9533014,0.000614144,0.008867137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001758405,0.0004437638,0.0002387273,0.0001339271,0.00005193937,0.00004418027,0.001832605,0.00005730246,0.00003734474,0.9309219,0.0642831,0.0001968831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8137012,0.00180533,0.000002559334,0.04557522,0.0002436686,0.0001303567,0.0000581729,0.00001204123,0.1384715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947611,0.00003670637,0.0000198091,0.002840951,0.001992839,0.000001105473,7.970345e-7,0.00001807695,0.0003285892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.18106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3797856,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114070813","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00161.x","title":"Global Care Chains: Freedom, Responsibility, and Solidarity<sup>1</sup>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Allison Weir","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04088998789279767,"gpt":0.3114444896335405,"spread":0.2705545017407429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009878221,0.0001400591,0.0002921048,0.00005198263,0.001797842,0.00003803169,0.0004194987,0.000116064,0.000013254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004693531,0.00008380147,0.0002103483,0.0002780522,0.00190823,0.0001308081,0.0001061968,0.0002615706,0.00001635474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001091971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002731038,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008323626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002872584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982172,0.0004700116,0.000329765,0.0001213844,0.0005610251,0.0003006607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989875,0.0001494085,0.0002456941,0.0001615717,0.0003020689,0.0001537848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003484047,0.00008267176,0.02205073,0.00002556519,0.0002558914,0.00006407367,0.8756042,0.0001017353,0.000006303648,0.09932006,0.000575165,0.001565217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001331404,0.0003262691,0.006320963,0.00009072651,0.0001235994,0.0001185534,0.2738955,0.00001501864,0.000004919583,0.7144897,0.002966389,0.0003169676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9320391,0.00302129,0.00001111822,0.01864991,0.0002429595,0.0001735562,0.00005980984,0.00002871056,0.04577358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949796,0.0004747105,0.00004821273,0.0003882352,0.003868754,0.000001328673,2.633227e-7,0.000009412204,0.000229509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6151696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078990544","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00098.x","title":"Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Economic Justice; Virtue; Denial; Law and economics; Law; Subject (documents); Collective responsibility; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Pablo Gilabert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04009014783141977,"gpt":0.2285022885758115,"spread":0.1884121407443917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000447102,0.0001109592,0.0001977491,0.00008191074,0.000282571,0.00005916134,0.0001778451,0.00004550862,0.0001552054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003194832,0.00007139952,0.00009967406,0.00002158659,0.0005386306,0.0001496543,0.00002056402,0.0002591868,0.00001808686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001118567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002976063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001948709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000169867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999132,0.0001097082,0.0003466383,0.00007971785,0.0002217073,0.0001101728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989313,0.0001781924,0.0004355882,0.0001317666,0.0002888321,0.0000343601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001242651,0.0001006786,0.00003192592,0.0001030249,0.00007998361,0.000005100922,0.1777123,0.00001696987,0.0001379374,0.8208964,0.0002721626,0.0005192614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008860833,0.0004966026,0.0006023694,0.0002904978,0.0007762584,0.00003947328,0.06034711,0.00003567433,0.0002792918,0.9255805,0.01042282,0.0002433252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7279609,0.008072593,0.00007579214,0.04207857,0.001141738,0.0002456805,0.0002114945,0.00002919842,0.220184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995693,0.00005644237,0.00002891199,0.0001410296,0.002705565,7.3128e-7,0.00000252423,0.00001648064,0.001355376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2677321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2911588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011703803","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00132.x","title":"Free Love: A Hegelian Defense of Same‐Sex Marriage Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Duty; Institution; Mount; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jim Vernon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02495260672409235,"gpt":0.2778689694125014,"spread":0.2529163626884091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006560473,0.000155128,0.0004691159,0.0002002492,0.000062035,0.000007291747,0.000407122,0.00009886554,0.00008595039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003648015,0.00008253784,0.0002468374,0.0002341792,0.0002327995,0.00005551694,0.00003504474,0.000511795,0.00005798426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003547815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008738851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000159365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000113295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985723,0.00008162387,0.0005647585,0.0001445044,0.0004124978,0.0002243167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982414,0.00006586294,0.0005552428,0.000756661,0.0002529278,0.0001279562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03861242,0.009458979,0.04472836,0.002328818,0.005145311,0.005152572,0.1020657,0.0002036393,0.1650202,0.4217447,0.04470647,0.1608329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002167827,0.002010806,0.002397742,0.0002679132,0.0001602526,0.0006596792,0.000853225,0.00000350204,0.007551192,0.9813666,0.002447626,0.0001135774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165651,0.003144911,0.00007734616,0.06040405,0.0001879144,0.0003070048,0.00003286199,0.0000378886,0.01924291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972606,0.00005750026,0.0007263052,0.0007015186,0.0009395964,4.345027e-7,5.466482e-7,0.000013669,0.0002998574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5596219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3365795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493767296","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00121.x","title":"DERRIDA ON THE DEATH PENALTY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Deconstruction (building); Sovereignty; Abolitionism; Philosophy; Renunciation; Capital punishment; Politics; Reading (process); Punishment (psychology); Conscience; Law; Epistemology; Capital (architecture); Literature; Theology; Political science; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Art","authors":[{"name":"Matthias Fritsch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1195639480933679,"gpt":0.2740227496707496,"spread":0.1544588015773817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001424955,0.0001937479,0.0002319658,0.00007133609,0.0007466419,0.0001431653,0.0006664954,0.0000507854,0.001296996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009059946,0.00008709337,0.0003532845,0.0000279852,0.0004354802,0.0002032926,0.00005256087,0.0007309761,0.0008627833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002923712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003622042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004280581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008727047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984025,0.000271768,0.0004021885,0.0000839524,0.0005233693,0.0003162604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986197,0.0002823798,0.0004184177,0.0003567019,0.0001956018,0.0001272228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008932657,0.0001022705,0.00008487424,0.000009109581,0.0001492927,0.000004361321,0.08377319,0.000005369503,0.0000261851,0.9140711,0.001562813,0.0001221333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003935967,0.0002027748,0.00006950356,0.0001000972,0.0001537024,0.00006127529,0.007132179,0.000005050101,0.00008788468,0.892459,0.09913924,0.000195667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3335424,0.002092697,0.00002402593,0.08703198,0.004093697,0.0002415456,0.00009860536,0.00004319822,0.5728318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779444,0.00001947697,0.000008585113,0.004645995,0.01627387,0.00000260408,0.000001104844,0.00003334787,0.001070657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6444019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075924159","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00086.x","title":"Malebranche and Descartes on Method: Psychologism, Free Will, and Doubt","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Psychologism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Relation (database); Subject (documents); Cartesianism; Computer science; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"David Scott","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07650655209298385,"gpt":0.2516115422228375,"spread":0.1751049901298537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005592115,0.0001418616,0.0002311315,0.00008683041,0.0009054015,0.00004187037,0.000375312,0.00003934968,0.0001578166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007450837,0.00007756709,0.00009684679,0.00004582282,0.0009625163,0.0001962393,0.00005738902,0.0003333904,0.00001862586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001350717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001410019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001086368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003311398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989918,0.0001459012,0.0002756344,0.0001453647,0.0002880402,0.0001531951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991432,0.0002156798,0.0002101417,0.0002308254,0.00008588634,0.0001142163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003553187,0.0001644003,0.0003097694,0.00002088919,0.0001006455,0.00008039152,0.1930095,0.00001790127,0.0003506181,0.798965,0.003067305,0.003558239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009120579,0.0007687479,0.0002144029,0.00005427047,0.00004908427,0.0003533404,0.001144666,0.00001571149,0.00004015967,0.9497046,0.04654473,0.0001982148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8445534,0.003819946,0.0003493605,0.03603026,0.0009530254,0.0001883844,0.0000577881,0.000040819,0.114007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958238,0.00009100437,0.000395269,0.001542483,0.001610606,0.000001134808,1.406743e-7,0.00001254062,0.0005230498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1918648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6963708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394692283","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12554","title":"The concept of unlivability: A reading of Frantz Fanon's “The North African Syndrome” (1952)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Colonialism; Reading (process); Resistance (ecology); Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Gender studies; Anthropology; History; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Sujaya Dhanvantari","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0324209632371599,"gpt":0.2918188526448891,"spread":0.2593978894077292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001416588,0.0001143292,0.0003130405,0.00003006018,0.0009864942,0.00004696787,0.0007919425,0.00005097863,0.0001957203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002894156,0.00004305265,0.0003266005,0.0004358952,0.003741134,0.00007157838,0.00008862648,0.0003539656,0.00001360624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004350549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001041329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006148261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001728552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981182,0.0004596635,0.0005053735,0.00009374908,0.000591772,0.0002313041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980028,0.001108001,0.000413996,0.0002075477,0.0002054551,0.00006222024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000267196,0.0001980031,0.00316405,0.00006275099,0.001221459,0.00007453437,0.438302,0.00009133798,0.00009239349,0.5346071,0.001121239,0.02079796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005197667,0.001450455,0.002367435,0.0004193558,0.0003911421,0.00005870298,0.3918288,0.00004025169,0.000114502,0.4804161,0.1220924,0.0003010629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9166198,0.0110427,0.0001066263,0.0464139,0.0008404144,0.0002686053,0.0000478977,0.00001969527,0.02464037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998652,0.0005104612,0.00001207495,0.00007822635,0.0005419296,0.00000153659,1.401321e-7,0.000009313606,0.0001943629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1209711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100178732","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01944.x","title":"Foucault after Hyppolite: Toward an A-Theistic Theodicy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Multiculturalism; Theodicy; Philosophy; Criticism; History and philosophy of science; Art history; Classics; Epistemology; Theology; History; Law; Art; Literature; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Réal Fillion","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06604896464539492,"gpt":0.2710881779474994,"spread":0.2050392133021045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008429549,0.0002707845,0.0003597593,0.0001487618,0.0003721175,0.0002600336,0.0007592015,0.00008625384,0.00202629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006180109,0.0001625142,0.0003952165,0.00003972158,0.0007775426,0.0004373773,0.00006084201,0.0006731572,0.0007604567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004631683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007469459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004802203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005444155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980501,0.0002509431,0.0006427247,0.0001749487,0.0005370297,0.000344259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984486,0.0001048213,0.0004387448,0.000437575,0.0003647466,0.0002055857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000546214,0.0002977073,0.0000286356,0.00004439595,0.0002593671,0.00004795176,0.3028849,0.00003896583,0.00006932257,0.6924302,0.0005544865,0.002797851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007691161,0.0003441248,0.00002325655,0.00009700918,0.0002105628,0.00009142661,0.006081756,0.00004210508,0.00003126305,0.8853771,0.1066371,0.000295155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5522612,0.005329248,0.0001778587,0.1061216,0.003958642,0.0004504432,0.0005576623,0.0001665117,0.3309769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718714,0.00002967859,0.00007685687,0.003907831,0.0226926,0.000004709694,0.000003788051,0.00005613263,0.001356992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4196102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806049702","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12274","title":"The Birth of <i>Being and Time</i>: Heidegger's Pivotal 1921 Reading of Aristotle's <i>On the Soul</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Soul; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Ontology; Key (lock); Fundamental ontology; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Computer science; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Francisco J. González","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01959150973873131,"gpt":0.2555237630634463,"spread":0.235932253324715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001802965,0.0002172547,0.0004091554,0.00009587807,0.0005320171,0.00002391063,0.0008486108,0.0001148864,0.0001786107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001280531,0.0001023117,0.0002487451,0.0002137102,0.001841024,0.0000608177,0.0001274907,0.0006021889,0.0001859032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001399829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003298009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001834132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001412389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979141,0.0005444958,0.0007242355,0.0001769097,0.0003362942,0.0003039523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971921,0.0008311457,0.001072492,0.000612004,0.0002164842,0.00007570176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005013635,0.000448232,0.001817429,0.00004558708,0.002352952,0.00003652763,0.05118084,0.0000183447,0.02173845,0.911686,0.002127973,0.003534041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001026194,0.00161893,0.0004578047,0.0001538951,0.0001973397,0.0001876896,0.003083611,0.00001209989,0.001353691,0.9892216,0.002508208,0.0001789677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.853263,0.001344412,0.00004325996,0.0144389,0.0008335784,0.0002135917,0.00003837621,0.00001474499,0.1298101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974211,0.00002926473,0.00002516594,0.0006878393,0.001481903,0.000002828796,4.843862e-7,0.00003459466,0.0003167897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1441581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.678333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400546234","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12582","title":"Thoughts on the structure of the history of Africana philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Chike Jeffers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04648233115476529,"gpt":0.2561483734416115,"spread":0.2096660422868462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007656345,0.0001895575,0.0003456342,0.00005729624,0.000429708,0.00002080929,0.001260515,0.00008862076,0.000214476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002637117,0.00006785618,0.0005325679,0.0004789943,0.002001039,0.00008084185,0.0001022592,0.000669062,0.00001514316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001894428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002471488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003619317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974973,0.0006150453,0.000505227,0.0001381183,0.00103192,0.0002124374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981429,0.0006588997,0.0005649654,0.0003081269,0.0002488845,0.00007620373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001604848,0.00008337796,0.0001402506,0.00007219151,0.0005296167,0.000009086725,0.1653774,0.0000579155,0.002396328,0.8228784,0.007480597,0.0008143662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001169117,0.0001530148,0.00009111152,0.0002937947,0.0001433892,0.000005919955,0.004211111,0.000003613833,0.0002185822,0.939944,0.05470571,0.0001128974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4037951,0.02240069,0.00001194197,0.4188447,0.005914489,0.0007100945,0.0003584136,0.00005162462,0.147913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939023,0.00009927903,0.0000101034,0.0005444565,0.004442808,9.580058e-7,2.202276e-7,0.00001678082,0.0009830935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5901073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.737291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406098040","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12612","title":"A common measure: Hobbes on the epistemic functions of public reason","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Sovereignty; Epistemology; Politics; Measure (data warehouse); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Amy M. Schmitter","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08143138602242155,"gpt":0.2541070526870265,"spread":0.1726756666646049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009811028,0.0001732013,0.0003252293,0.0001207344,0.0004381897,0.00008843828,0.000628101,0.00005146183,0.0007188917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002289561,0.00007938161,0.0004146795,0.0001264979,0.0006926203,0.00007916639,0.00005706457,0.0005652556,0.0001123749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003716569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005800368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002258167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001566489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981611,0.0004964482,0.0005694553,0.0001059907,0.0004436805,0.0002233386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981881,0.0006982462,0.000353717,0.00037794,0.0002971172,0.00008492763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001372477,0.0002106756,0.00009151168,0.00002339458,0.000250924,0.000002107435,0.003459733,0.000003554744,0.00003828687,0.9933457,0.001404593,0.001032306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004136002,0.0002422369,0.00005460551,0.0003391002,0.0001546453,0.00001061251,0.003028989,0.000008738335,0.00007806301,0.9237816,0.07179041,0.00009736629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2507982,0.003504734,0.00006403347,0.3696982,0.001834153,0.0003466472,0.0002459799,0.00003882231,0.3734693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948334,0.00002892096,0.000002636217,0.001624433,0.001717119,0.00000478013,0.000002046351,0.00001545247,0.001771191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7440352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7871361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388133135","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12545","title":"Heidegger's fundamental ontology and the human good in Aristotelian ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Existentialism; Naturalism; Ontology; Rationality; Parallels; GRASP; Analytic philosophy; Character (mathematics); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"John Hacker‐Wright","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08482429848669673,"gpt":0.29481864546611,"spread":0.2099943469794133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003955728,0.0001577603,0.0003301688,0.0001504998,0.0006925313,0.0001192194,0.00047391,0.0001109223,0.0001816762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001767165,0.00007873434,0.0001807798,0.0000867455,0.002273713,0.00008075713,0.000121676,0.001801661,0.00009606408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002348859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005137646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001975831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004759661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981278,0.000646734,0.0005044132,0.000121684,0.0003655058,0.0002338281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982971,0.0009890392,0.0003185269,0.0002174267,0.0001086723,0.00006923384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001258148,0.00003260591,0.00008472281,0.00001514932,0.00007413032,0.0000297937,0.09830429,0.000007437125,0.00002698027,0.9011262,0.00002646586,0.0001463949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001426487,0.0001165313,0.0001339764,0.00007406723,0.00004027786,0.00003336111,0.008571542,0.00002154548,0.000003336472,0.9838012,0.005677359,0.0001002579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6882759,0.001268629,0.000003790772,0.2380548,0.0007032276,0.0002137956,0.0000493605,0.00003713818,0.07139338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954409,0.00008978173,0.000002574978,0.002588625,0.001571452,0.00000369207,0.000001710651,0.00002371535,0.000277542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.307165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110946410","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00015.x","title":"Agent Reliabilism, Subjective Justification, and Epistemic Credit","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Christine McKinnon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0411197691073327,"gpt":0.2391962339446754,"spread":0.1980764648373427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000815785,0.0001323985,0.0002324812,0.00006710216,0.0003390694,0.0000749567,0.0002305094,0.00005152767,0.0000846759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005871339,0.00008200703,0.0001458856,0.00003063309,0.0008152578,0.0001100014,0.00002430749,0.0003683762,0.00005743995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002903403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004447472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001035582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005612099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988999,0.0001809889,0.0004370973,0.0001157419,0.0002250714,0.0001411757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986428,0.0002102355,0.0004899098,0.0002077081,0.0004020252,0.00004730308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009507983,0.0001177953,0.0005098401,0.00006574581,0.0001220657,0.00001028044,0.07790647,0.00004610113,0.0004336132,0.9182264,0.002033448,0.0004331385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003863957,0.0001528199,0.0004164334,0.00006157353,0.0001634159,0.00004513269,0.006999625,0.000008785628,0.0001016737,0.9640473,0.0274847,0.0001321123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9097751,0.003712104,0.0001541716,0.02558426,0.001926007,0.0002477078,0.00008731434,0.00003763413,0.0584757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919937,0.00003958069,0.00004780461,0.0002901536,0.005220667,0.00000244689,0.000002715323,0.00002104184,0.00238189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0822186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.334415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942090137","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12080","title":"Some Features of Promises and their Obligations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Moral obligation; Normative; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael G. Pratt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02722561487486898,"gpt":0.2298875999991912,"spread":0.2026619851243222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002619688,0.00008332134,0.0001481652,0.00005761602,0.000111312,0.00001978255,0.0003048606,0.00002380623,0.00001332773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002574783,0.0000399754,0.00008916349,0.00009251312,0.0002337751,0.0001104364,0.00003626421,0.0001585914,0.000008067875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003212882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001649781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002383056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.062578e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993348,0.0001320511,0.0002123115,0.00007508799,0.0001553649,0.00009043315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992817,0.000192285,0.0002821175,0.0001486413,0.00004531758,0.0000499179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001045529,0.0001345356,0.0004278179,0.00004779961,0.00003433908,0.000004257118,0.009392736,0.00006281792,0.8140651,0.1682916,0.0002538826,0.007180608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004066852,0.0002319918,0.0009431751,0.00007651683,0.00002119502,0.0001004296,0.0002484989,0.00003360616,0.1186772,0.8787271,0.0004525618,0.00008101288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897589,0.0007049734,0.00004768041,0.006426792,0.0001576931,0.00007653649,0.00002327901,0.000008895438,0.00279522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988165,0.00004689024,0.00003863067,0.0003515483,0.0006204878,6.93944e-7,7.941049e-8,0.000009150856,0.000115952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7104356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.163015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010343456","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00057.x","title":"The <i>Meno's</i> Metaphilosophical Examples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Contrast (vision); Epistemology; Philosophy; Key (lock); Sketch; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Matthew J. King","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04833043365752451,"gpt":0.2417534965416718,"spread":0.1934230628841473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002636426,0.0002539265,0.0003394748,0.00009419876,0.001301663,0.0002424087,0.001028775,0.00006543166,0.0002421031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001548247,0.000112839,0.0005147096,0.0001055664,0.001440126,0.0001803627,0.00009596442,0.0007925696,0.000221975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003866759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004242404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001751596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001281824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976742,0.0001933148,0.0008539423,0.0001510892,0.0007078054,0.0004197083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973096,0.001153794,0.0006001007,0.0004384327,0.0003171764,0.0001809488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003219203,0.00009569508,0.00001635715,0.000006889113,0.0002274893,0.000035672,0.00905627,0.000003477526,0.0001102498,0.9862477,0.001200032,0.00267831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003716103,0.0001755069,0.0000212535,0.00002863357,0.0001054574,0.0000514702,0.002385991,0.000002367761,0.00008111919,0.7246864,0.2719613,0.0001289496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1765396,0.01096274,0.0005127214,0.2285557,0.006037546,0.0006944583,0.0001451214,0.0001617866,0.5763904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837127,0.00005190774,0.00003777023,0.001369019,0.01405,0.00000194742,0.000001134248,0.00004067059,0.0007348972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8071731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380356787","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12522","title":"Expressing and receiving negative emotions: Comments on Myisha Cherry's <i>The Case for Rage</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rage (emotion); Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Nicolas Bommarito","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09392404286219735,"gpt":0.3515936713885609,"spread":0.2576696285263635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000908584,0.0001278267,0.0001725198,0.00009267186,0.0005611508,0.0000603383,0.0002257295,0.00005526503,0.0000974404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009245492,0.00007129335,0.0001417698,0.0001828916,0.0001417993,0.00006793817,0.00004548355,0.000335523,0.00006452959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002086346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001150213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002459601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003781203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989789,0.0002687937,0.0003080274,0.0001251346,0.0001235461,0.0001956197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987433,0.0005263963,0.0003137635,0.0002540531,0.00009749579,0.00006497146],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003718187,0.002532588,0.004409532,0.0002254665,0.00281824,0.005526836,0.5730428,0.0008091995,0.01390182,0.0545421,0.09271242,0.2457608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02166301,0.005236018,0.02412739,0.002729604,0.002042059,0.01413564,0.2579191,0.0005254392,0.0009092831,0.6493515,0.01964394,0.001716975],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790404,0.0001746247,0.0001933828,0.01776045,0.0005792078,0.0003219073,0.00007995591,0.0000253186,0.001824737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997701,0.00001187574,0.0001423862,0.0007308727,0.0006528386,0.00001954661,0.000001266558,0.00003071144,0.0007094693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5948095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4315975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395075826","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12568","title":"The young Leibniz's tentative acceptance of physical occasionalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Christian Henkel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04036566334219853,"gpt":0.259916670611993,"spread":0.2195510072697945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005720269,0.0001258374,0.0001996774,0.00005622208,0.0005371132,0.000137228,0.0006819327,0.00001934097,0.0001537287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006394224,0.00005402187,0.0003314191,0.0001095691,0.001085432,0.0002302797,0.000043932,0.0003890011,0.0001182738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003804895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006269465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001384267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007362725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986967,0.0001254078,0.000359067,0.000108671,0.0005540254,0.0001560929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998841,0.0004551813,0.0002408627,0.0001822985,0.000220962,0.00005963169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005672941,0.00004653519,0.000008143028,0.00001423541,0.00007943198,0.00001812506,0.1296185,0.00001786435,0.0003500701,0.8675919,0.0009298821,0.001268604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001597277,0.0002855058,0.00002529606,0.0001379956,0.00007947191,0.00004174373,0.007542511,0.0001621426,0.0001101212,0.9456097,0.0457241,0.0001217007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5474892,0.0190567,0.0003039168,0.06021998,0.009276882,0.0005146016,0.0003394034,0.0001017649,0.3626976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943598,0.00002363994,0.00001333483,0.0001291205,0.003855509,0.000001793968,2.962947e-7,0.00001392802,0.001602591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4468706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4131095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100959722","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00045.x","title":"Yielding Actuality: Trust and Reason in Gillian Rose's Vision of Community","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Equivocation; Rationality; Epistemology; Friendship; Alterity; Sociology; Impossibility; Conviction; Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Robin Lathangue","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.041607044259081,"gpt":0.3280487834047635,"spread":0.2864417391456825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005017494,0.00006518209,0.0002026895,0.00007585887,0.0004349852,0.00002483266,0.0002615197,0.00005628476,0.00001547297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004009657,0.00004575054,0.00007046153,0.0001824528,0.0004325713,0.0001117302,0.0000552956,0.0003891121,0.000001762681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003364209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002739317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001365341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005530336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987684,0.0004054776,0.0003208917,0.00003815802,0.0003010767,0.0001660338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990633,0.0003886674,0.0002816809,0.0000957508,0.0001088754,0.00006170911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007302428,0.0005356134,0.07892762,0.00009473214,0.0001739674,0.00006149443,0.7985029,0.00000985528,0.0019516,0.006292699,0.001748681,0.1109706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002409201,0.0008768078,0.1372941,0.001122872,0.0001169948,0.0000556278,0.6313497,0.000003657995,0.0009083377,0.2186378,0.006821995,0.0004029774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703382,0.0009171114,0.00001832468,0.003701643,0.00008896901,0.00005790767,0.000005429625,0.000004341854,0.02486813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992205,0.0002398465,0.00004977539,0.0001244676,0.0003222596,1.444178e-7,1.507637e-7,0.000005352023,0.00003749353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2123451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3345599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987355271","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00007.x","title":"Epistemic Side Constraints and the Structure of Epistemic Normativity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Rationality; Constraint (computer-aided design); Order (exchange); Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Economics; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Zachary A. Silver","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02369998707612051,"gpt":0.2223327275725654,"spread":0.1986327404964449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001001975,0.0001665369,0.0004488054,0.00005544689,0.0002954931,0.00005288714,0.0003464462,0.00006376965,0.00009862517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006823564,0.00008025844,0.0002360066,0.00003140881,0.004367782,0.0001085144,0.00004122638,0.0005568588,0.000008950959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001462402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000550952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001563371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001533396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983809,0.0004701039,0.0006302894,0.00008717242,0.0002741816,0.0001573822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978836,0.0005897665,0.0009881809,0.0002350661,0.0002666512,0.00003672699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001769904,0.00003449526,0.0002503115,0.0001090388,0.0001721672,0.000005270544,0.04844451,0.00003028063,0.001599751,0.9485008,0.00008601093,0.0005903984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001216054,0.00006696071,0.00009857648,0.0001129159,0.0001597333,0.0001406287,0.005596909,0.00001045963,0.0003517025,0.9916145,0.0005310642,0.0001004971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9525794,0.002050064,0.00008228826,0.0173614,0.0005673394,0.000213921,0.0002380158,0.00001195259,0.02689558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978178,0.00002430861,0.00003338343,0.0003105194,0.001484765,4.593848e-7,0.000001845029,0.00001585922,0.0003111154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04523831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104601679","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2009.tb00088.x","title":"The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Wright; Epistemology; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Medicine; Art history","authors":[{"name":"Ken Levy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06441762251572031,"gpt":0.2627732214660006,"spread":0.1983555989502803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001962952,0.0001387517,0.0001921914,0.00003656342,0.001209953,0.0001685443,0.0007250511,0.00004004518,0.00005164912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109762,0.00005536812,0.0002541106,0.00004605483,0.0004587052,0.00008927285,0.00003131737,0.0005457606,0.0002453393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002094325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004564056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002586596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009962217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985874,0.0003567759,0.000389162,0.00008763932,0.0003450928,0.0002339026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985974,0.000340262,0.0003593595,0.0003729593,0.0002604961,0.00006949247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002732807,0.0001138272,0.00002675101,0.000007487271,0.0001924332,0.00001037342,0.2057136,0.000113623,0.0001632869,0.7677816,0.0101715,0.01543224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002637307,0.0003664193,0.0001164067,0.00004134703,0.0001057289,0.00002751661,0.007510374,0.00001251732,0.00004066625,0.7493955,0.2419998,0.0001200036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2711087,0.008787474,0.0007975605,0.5853437,0.005647975,0.0007728939,0.00006770995,0.00007501486,0.1273989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880449,0.00007683127,0.00001966189,0.003648673,0.005882146,0.000001961471,4.958425e-7,0.00001403957,0.002311358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7169361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366683289","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12510","title":"Raging better: Reflections on the Myisha Cherry's <i>The Case for Rage</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rage (emotion); Typology; Argument (complex analysis); Anger; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Alice MacLachlan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1463727223916758,"gpt":0.3781314620560827,"spread":0.2317587396644069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001420366,0.0001434,0.0001624151,0.0001012825,0.0008426714,0.00005871539,0.000488255,0.00005974475,0.0003344612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005867482,0.00006373507,0.0003395384,0.0003669059,0.0001480078,0.00003933318,0.00004032799,0.0005688414,0.0004522399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002615994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002061302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000316492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001122409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998797,0.0003026336,0.0003449829,0.0001295259,0.0001655091,0.0002603381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985387,0.0005267105,0.0002878312,0.0004786911,0.0001117145,0.00005637333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002212094,0.001640156,0.000835323,0.00007541711,0.002992486,0.00591372,0.24623,0.001048202,0.01881069,0.3596458,0.2946548,0.06594136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006887101,0.002836593,0.00259842,0.0004051845,0.001948838,0.01736126,0.1140646,0.0001588721,0.0005808864,0.6348903,0.2171776,0.00109034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8385897,0.0001530902,0.0002540422,0.1503302,0.001356371,0.0004277414,0.00008504251,0.00005139605,0.008752455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993252,0.000006017025,0.00004208715,0.00303578,0.001627146,0.00004758384,0.000001300746,0.00004227685,0.001945834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2752445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6481232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401549937","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12586","title":"Preparing the particular: Kant on the imagination's role in judgment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Imagination; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Dunn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03284837201702968,"gpt":0.2469954790419108,"spread":0.2141471070248812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002221593,0.0001339321,0.0001426331,0.00007314943,0.0003497537,0.000323307,0.0005232499,0.00002864554,0.0002986706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009059501,0.0000500912,0.0002067087,0.0000670954,0.000449877,0.0001020481,0.00006531272,0.0008699127,0.000189665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004021472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004918185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002045094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002691014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986408,0.0002878724,0.0003518531,0.0001084748,0.0004376976,0.0001733274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988646,0.0005973054,0.0001374513,0.0002725046,0.00008960957,0.00003856239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004018029,0.00004867101,0.000003481296,0.000009914529,0.00008672045,0.00001410833,0.04737103,0.0001585684,0.00005611135,0.951311,0.0001214874,0.0007787264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001246862,0.00007864452,0.000007851912,0.0002074229,0.00004517008,0.00001294706,0.003369401,0.0006317057,0.00006612825,0.9678594,0.02752417,0.00007247228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2887898,0.006647145,0.00002838879,0.46613,0.001323756,0.0004147712,0.00003778542,0.00004834652,0.2365801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956033,0.00003405039,0.000001531301,0.002134499,0.002024296,0.00001002598,3.860435e-7,0.00002123194,0.0001706856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7068135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3779386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}