{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":49,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":49,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"44e27f922d6f","filters":{"venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W1997782852","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1093","title":"Settlement, Return, and the Supersession Thesis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Settlement (finance); Indigenous; Human settlement; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Economics; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Waldron","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01548796120428758,"gpt":0.3141964076059255,"spread":0.2987084464016379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008204625,0.00006877397,0.0001186301,0.00001393166,0.0004497133,0.00005210293,0.0001554937,0.00005702214,0.0003667879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003698042,0.00004197325,0.00003077773,0.0001047296,0.2362982,0.00009054466,0.00006383428,0.0001237636,0.00001026455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005864989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000190471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002894718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008247305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990336,0.0002708952,0.0001334397,0.0001118404,0.0002059696,0.0002442433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991256,0.0006351475,0.00002096421,0.0001150791,0.00002854666,0.00007465769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004065378,0.00001321348,0.0001850162,0.000001963058,0.000003876412,0.000002780968,0.004431141,0.000001695497,0.000003535442,0.9951751,0.0000490917,0.00009190406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004795254,0.00001484224,0.0000117198,0.00002243214,0.00001001887,0.000001874504,0.005684792,0.000002724318,0.00007270894,0.9350156,0.05861172,0.00007204546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04860301,0.0002749356,0.00939768,0.05604923,0.000302542,0.0002956482,0.00002540133,0.00005827021,0.8849933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959922,0.00009885964,0.0002355095,0.003377018,0.0001598686,0.000009922577,0.000001960119,0.000003960844,0.0001207071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7657802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121641526","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1198","title":"Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dignity; Religious law; Family law; Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Arbitration; Allegiance; Sociology; Israeli law; Identity (music); Religious identity; Political science; Private sphere; Public sphere; Private law; Islam; Public law; Religiosity; Black letter law","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03512001175155976,"gpt":0.2922466806274343,"spread":0.2571266688758745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004617331,0.0001120975,0.0001795007,0.00007009623,0.0006341783,0.00004144178,0.0002474965,0.0001797122,0.0000629087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002087498,0.0001155467,0.00004701713,0.0002894444,0.03654731,0.0003394243,0.0001779971,0.0001894934,0.00003805052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001871475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007543706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01709482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984608,0.0002702133,0.00026828,0.0002555484,0.000435638,0.0003095329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993087,0.0003400088,0.00004878557,0.0001667046,0.00005523537,0.00008054156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005042085,0.00007488431,0.00323561,0.000003161753,0.000003102512,0.00006096993,0.03407885,0.00001681309,0.0001184037,0.9618624,0.0004403615,0.0000549938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004056936,0.00003630471,0.00101642,0.00003455585,0.000007433896,0.00000165863,0.004144544,0.0001132292,0.000187547,0.9930705,0.0008242935,0.0001577479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.615597,0.0002767264,0.004437005,0.0009747769,0.000274736,0.0002330789,0.000008012996,0.00008409291,0.3781146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974152,0.000325422,0.0004395943,0.001578572,0.0001613519,0.00001301045,0.00002593489,0.000008585883,0.00003227952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3818183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125806982","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1000","title":"Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Injustice; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Tort; Political science; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Ernest J. Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02935955596404381,"gpt":0.3850370660161229,"spread":0.3556775100520791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005070636,0.00007724884,0.0001029024,0.00002697033,0.000550747,0.00006421548,0.0002718944,0.00009314171,0.001201373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006378957,0.00007118707,0.00003046512,0.0003176001,0.06060011,0.0001943616,0.00009282873,0.0001889517,0.0003198398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000914746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001038353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002873811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001435741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989771,0.0001763556,0.0001510398,0.0001873832,0.0002269383,0.0002812243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990987,0.0005097641,0.00002611887,0.0001858869,0.00006994436,0.0001095529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003261255,0.00006165609,0.0001862962,0.000002587431,0.000002636747,0.00001625998,0.003630136,0.00001984352,0.00001466864,0.9951944,0.000424994,0.0004139626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009764964,0.00002484029,0.0001144769,0.00001468416,0.00001319237,0.000004159591,0.004870369,0.00005400699,0.00005580415,0.8050727,0.1895796,0.00009852877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04431149,0.00006474841,0.01670347,0.009292071,0.0003292173,0.0002079273,0.000005740331,0.0001054847,0.9289799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965164,0.0001234906,0.0002941326,0.001321029,0.0003390574,0.00003343296,0.000004256206,0.000006716535,0.001361488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154197270","doi":"10.1515/til-2013-009","title":"Differentiation in the Emerging Climate Regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Climate change; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Developing country; Kyoto Protocol; Convention; Conference of the parties; International community; Montreal Protocol; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Economic growth; Politics; Ecology; Law; Ozone layer","authors":[{"name":"Lavanya Rajamani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05232735177005776,"gpt":0.2660323475270985,"spread":0.2137049957570407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007326375,0.0001218337,0.0002608465,0.0001164438,0.00007426868,0.0001275213,0.0002880716,0.00009375123,0.00208974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001000196,0.0001069931,0.00005472916,0.0001613603,0.004327069,0.0002782537,0.00009906473,0.0001885777,0.001063492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006344722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001967384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004103859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987461,0.00003959457,0.0005375698,0.0002360417,0.00002325314,0.0004174155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993456,0.0001932556,0.000106838,0.0003117773,0.000007704977,0.00003480837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008009527,0.00004537548,0.00939541,0.00001589229,0.000003226279,9.5618e-7,0.002792407,0.000009918375,0.000003297893,0.987498,0.0001226648,0.0001047936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027086,0.00002159604,0.004498612,0.00001617773,0.000001477143,0.000001950432,0.0007527007,0.003757545,0.00002795163,0.9893296,0.001169877,0.0001516764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.887921,0.0002629547,0.002528193,0.009096505,0.0003692775,0.0003440943,0.00004196846,0.00003055946,0.09940547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973621,0.0002418536,0.00007454393,0.002058604,0.0001182445,0.00008772568,0.00001857404,0.00001570092,0.00002266937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1094411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969029342","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1158","title":"Citizenship with a Vengeance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Amnesty; Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Immigration; Argument (complex analysis); Globalization; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Dauvergne","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01612652756040001,"gpt":0.3229364869030785,"spread":0.3068099593426785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001464431,0.00008186285,0.0001134396,0.00003909355,0.0002229529,0.00005688175,0.0001520889,0.0001008567,0.0005776613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003336699,0.00006270739,0.00002310059,0.0002570796,0.03896379,0.0001288147,0.00001285793,0.0001496335,0.00003466375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007536664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005122011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003569984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002077387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989129,0.0001432589,0.0001816402,0.0001532784,0.000291497,0.000317386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993567,0.000301504,0.00003385972,0.0001360581,0.00008400099,0.00008789047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008480818,0.00001876904,0.0006874603,0.000003256694,0.000002947508,0.000005405932,0.01514355,0.000001078081,0.00002773837,0.9831481,0.0002888643,0.0005880299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002054101,0.0001101199,0.0002463168,0.00004415276,0.000005560079,0.000001413206,0.004786878,0.00001900995,0.001357953,0.9770893,0.01599276,0.0001411422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3341992,0.0001145602,0.1466909,0.001194769,0.0002548926,0.0002395442,0.000002297531,0.0001097145,0.5171942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979516,0.00002167335,0.0006534724,0.0006363179,0.0003038925,0.000007362216,0.000003783057,0.000008247805,0.0004136435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6637524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9636516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737459881","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0013","title":"Property and Sovereignty: How to Tell the Difference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Confusion; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Politics; Stewardship (theology); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Ripstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04499553625122221,"gpt":0.3274981946011386,"spread":0.2825026583499164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007262208,0.0001044181,0.0001552913,0.00001431988,0.001360134,0.0007588347,0.0007269219,0.00007430002,0.0005082479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008206113,0.00004170667,0.0000244054,0.00005178471,0.0777647,0.0002135298,0.0003184566,0.0001812541,0.00002315124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002576023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003952631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005035402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005561388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989191,0.0001779557,0.0001005095,0.0002156875,0.0002423418,0.0003443691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991603,0.0001860644,0.00003381186,0.0004366148,0.00004202943,0.0001412186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003577447,0.00001850772,0.0004525579,0.000003752658,0.000003117228,0.000005104442,0.003776811,5.227717e-8,0.00004465658,0.9894404,0.0001999877,0.006019234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001743686,0.00008274764,0.001124232,0.00004082127,0.000006814612,0.000001295601,0.0005720662,0.00003624299,0.0006187509,0.8270534,0.1701241,0.0001651912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06898467,0.00009714495,0.002904244,0.1470783,0.0003890255,0.0006746377,0.000006351117,0.0000562635,0.7798094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933968,0.00006880022,0.0001005242,0.001563304,0.0002480206,0.00001903881,3.936753e-7,0.000006723943,0.004596405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069029812","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1163","title":"(In)Security and Citizenship: Security, Im/migration and Shrinking Citizenship Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Resizing; Political science; Business; Law; Politics; Economic policy","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra Dobrowolsky","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01578769699608734,"gpt":0.3150778134869479,"spread":0.2992901164908606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003045068,0.0001634828,0.0002367528,0.0001329158,0.0003622178,0.0001964282,0.000136354,0.0002640566,0.0002047689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007922772,0.0001530828,0.00003309095,0.0002990785,0.02504947,0.0003097088,0.00006382078,0.0003077739,0.000004934255],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009046658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003966317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003261403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01357687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981019,0.0003848057,0.0004052826,0.0003292008,0.0003426907,0.000436149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988587,0.0006867465,0.00007196461,0.0001522771,0.00008924904,0.0001410169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006277704,0.0000179104,0.008216169,0.00001818136,0.000004062318,0.000007893869,0.06411674,1.999505e-7,0.00004804394,0.927026,0.0002389349,0.0002431154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002929552,0.00006166262,0.0008955596,0.00007328192,0.000008370243,0.000004708814,0.009338887,0.0001319583,0.0007943184,0.9867215,0.001485139,0.0001917249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321366,0.000464862,0.002712894,0.002029815,0.0002244133,0.0002855857,0.000003956239,0.00005882513,0.06208306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983632,0.0003894282,0.0001553321,0.0006343253,0.0003375156,0.00001001764,0.000009154382,0.00001197405,0.00008906933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06622659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9776038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126088849","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1019","title":"Correlativity, Personality, and the Emerging Consensus on Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Psychology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Ernest J. Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02813690632838961,"gpt":0.3426470481351979,"spread":0.3145101418068083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002072253,0.0001137436,0.0002346876,0.00002606031,0.0007833231,0.0001166235,0.0001689279,0.0001022354,0.0002485669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002004563,0.00007629122,0.00003886193,0.0002776204,0.09687977,0.00008654746,0.00008592375,0.0002919734,0.0000254311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005752448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000562951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002065441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009427048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981169,0.0007991098,0.000201569,0.000211439,0.0003521282,0.0003189306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964148,0.003241017,0.0000597511,0.0001165812,0.00008200672,0.00008579043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003235993,0.00003178675,0.000635261,0.00001091214,0.000009737651,0.00001061504,0.02943283,0.000007131487,9.329245e-7,0.9687384,0.0002410164,0.0005578189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007636399,0.00006474703,0.0001305314,0.00008767892,0.00004971709,0.000009158202,0.02378194,0.0002385861,0.00001179309,0.9617819,0.0129208,0.0001595729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1516086,0.0004187915,0.002539537,0.02098496,0.001052167,0.0004180246,0.000004194536,0.00007202769,0.8229017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997584,0.000080899,0.0000137686,0.001518957,0.0004257379,0.00001463721,4.436119e-7,0.000008568855,0.0003529977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8459754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.905578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911278515","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0003","title":"Re-reading Westin","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Anonymity; Information privacy; Reading (process); Privacy policy; Focus (optics); Privacy by Design; Control (management); Negotiation; Right to privacy; Curiosity; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02647148579545598,"gpt":0.3303166060744447,"spread":0.3038451202789887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001365944,0.00008942085,0.0001502664,0.00004413405,0.0002147106,0.00009873576,0.0004589719,0.0001423346,0.002327936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001231505,0.00008418639,0.00003415387,0.0002403768,0.02665052,0.0003366476,0.0002488324,0.0002321224,0.0005604214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008602261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004336688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002702428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001844559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986448,0.0003077614,0.0001842548,0.0002278008,0.0002725449,0.0003628332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991249,0.0003718065,0.0000342619,0.0003416046,0.0000346404,0.00009281131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000316338,0.00002687015,0.001591864,0.0000095225,0.000002108965,0.000002708909,0.005216822,9.528779e-7,0.00004983303,0.9922871,0.000311918,0.000468659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001922,0.00004976587,0.000057549,0.00003965931,0.000003914889,5.479615e-7,0.003272413,0.00006881068,0.0005421682,0.9676329,0.02800081,0.0001392565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1689278,0.00009268813,0.01326559,0.007876862,0.0015845,0.0005895143,0.000009799332,0.0002689456,0.8073843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984609,0.00002651385,0.0003734469,0.0006257445,0.0002819063,0.00001232296,0.000005541947,0.000009682646,0.00020391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8295331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042208543","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1127","title":"Facts on the Ground and Reconciliation of Divergent Consumer Insolvency Philosophies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Debt; Debtor; Opposition (politics); Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Jacob S. Ziegel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03783276758323504,"gpt":0.3068127772802049,"spread":0.2689800096969698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004547083,0.000058908,0.00009157898,0.00001822108,0.0002551948,0.00003337017,0.0001276842,0.0000545195,0.0002364553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001566636,0.00004035879,0.00002247645,0.0001216597,0.03138897,0.0000779914,0.00004986375,0.00008775972,0.00001308855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002964299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002115874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000407345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002067157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992797,0.0001255904,0.0001730713,0.0001104973,0.0001769078,0.0001342474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992667,0.0004890992,0.00004741278,0.0001264945,0.00004132036,0.00002890382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010727,0.00004202134,0.0007067544,0.000003610096,0.000002570315,2.259375e-7,0.0017489,0.000002819574,0.00005090945,0.9971671,0.00009106636,0.0001732975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008429482,0.0000242062,0.0009683919,0.00001375222,0.000005433774,1.058056e-7,0.0007704923,0.00001343381,0.0005143095,0.9858174,0.01173172,0.0000564459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8190275,0.0001250914,0.000638446,0.01417075,0.00009647336,0.0002717701,0.00001599765,0.00002264136,0.1656314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993542,0.00008785206,0.00003798711,0.0003380383,0.00009216477,0.00001737297,0.000002415888,0.000003636225,0.00006628725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1803268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043700055","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1291","title":"Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Family law; Legislature; Face (sociological concept); Law reform; Law; Political science; Best interests; Welfare; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Reg Graycar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07582124601240359,"gpt":0.3830031713158916,"spread":0.307181925303488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001789223,0.0002491349,0.0004682755,0.00004325498,0.0004393396,0.0001051596,0.0004593948,0.0003122731,0.001081242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006288554,0.000170693,0.00008981398,0.0004436455,0.05315857,0.0005853167,0.0002386605,0.0004708359,0.000252659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008590071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002585648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007967153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002578902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970601,0.0005253256,0.0005039203,0.0002981634,0.0005221657,0.001090354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988705,0.0004453422,0.00007723678,0.0002628129,0.00008297884,0.0002611456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009509063,0.00009051551,0.002269753,0.0000185659,0.00001450011,0.00001002159,0.03255999,5.374395e-7,0.0000408064,0.9644127,0.0002616603,0.0002258311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002488289,0.000273628,0.01277994,0.0006216877,0.00008613568,0.00000407368,0.08613146,0.00001968982,0.0008774667,0.6301211,0.2648017,0.001794874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4732661,0.0005528558,0.0001297524,0.003439345,0.0007139497,0.0008345857,0.00002032073,0.0001900772,0.520853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956813,0.0001054173,0.0004229843,0.001614439,0.000568016,0.00005550661,0.000007873119,0.00001876327,0.001525653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5224152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623388010","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-104","title":"Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Humanity; Political philosophy; Law and economics; International law; Political science; Popular sovereignty; Power (physics); Democracy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04991531528797417,"gpt":0.3507328770423187,"spread":0.3008175617543445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001583334,0.0001205887,0.0003002039,0.00003648717,0.0001321049,0.00002435385,0.0002454315,0.0002510321,0.000833332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001084959,0.0001015583,0.00004509252,0.0001676237,0.1316487,0.0001909511,0.0001365455,0.0002237366,0.00004733166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004061053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001050385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003162094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006376713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.0005782214,0.0002707011,0.0002099546,0.0002911522,0.0004715722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985902,0.0007864654,0.0000430196,0.0002115444,0.00006921947,0.0002995362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009886451,0.0000570465,0.0006314787,0.000007169609,0.000009703099,0.000007519839,0.002143844,0.000001374456,0.000001781852,0.9968249,0.00005857201,0.0001577109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003923461,0.0000741269,0.00006239749,0.00002173735,0.00001025893,0.000002335353,0.00232682,0.000028829,0.0004171979,0.9921759,0.004359704,0.0001283669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09493637,0.0002916682,0.001942805,0.0005883651,0.000244363,0.0001377868,0.00001228705,0.00004162217,0.9018047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983481,0.00005714857,0.0003256671,0.0007089165,0.0001832284,0.000006429335,0.000002005966,0.000008833401,0.0003597303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9034117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040638741","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1153","title":"Who Is the Citizen's Other? Considering the Heft of Citizenship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Statelessness; Refugee; Stateless protocol; Political science; Social citizenship; Politics; Sociology; Law; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Macklin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02731455271352973,"gpt":0.333184469801513,"spread":0.3058699170879832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003293586,0.0001029499,0.0001612637,0.00003211983,0.0004554644,0.00007772866,0.0003478923,0.00011934,0.001190841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008891624,0.00005726839,0.00007329182,0.0002631127,0.06081674,0.00008290307,0.00004202306,0.0002131258,0.00001601196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004364603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005634733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001696798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001521545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984115,0.0003928846,0.0003526442,0.0001451129,0.000380969,0.0003169138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978216,0.001650493,0.00008422154,0.0002729391,0.0001189432,0.00005182884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002832254,0.000009673237,0.0005485183,0.000004549076,0.00000826539,6.861507e-7,0.03961396,0.000001333804,0.00007931456,0.958133,0.001184987,0.0003873691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001229073,0.00003789045,0.0001487806,0.00004745591,0.00001081326,0.00000116349,0.02829561,0.00004953485,0.007002196,0.9419445,0.02224156,0.00009753037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3500917,0.0003237099,0.04551999,0.01347658,0.0003595303,0.000559741,0.00001248499,0.00007399756,0.5895823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958088,0.00004652403,0.00009861825,0.003358005,0.0002881494,0.000007104889,9.877967e-7,0.00001000349,0.0003817818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6457171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912552388","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0011","title":"Theorizing Privacy in a Liberal Democracy: Canadian Jurisprudence, Anti-Terrorism, and Social Memory After 9/11","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Liberal democracy; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Sociology; Terrorism; Right to privacy; Transparency (behavior); Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Valerie Steeves","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01059407913373436,"gpt":0.293567769427548,"spread":0.2829736902938136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001475033,0.0002132164,0.0004612768,0.0001587521,0.0004587085,0.0002034803,0.0003910858,0.0003382042,0.0008104033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001904075,0.0002125804,0.00008556183,0.0003538279,0.02433387,0.000451246,0.0001183214,0.0004208845,0.00006468065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002633027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003619049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0103935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07351701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973323,0.0005918091,0.0003781743,0.0004036951,0.0003661314,0.0009279114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990998,0.0003776961,0.00005855984,0.0002030046,0.00005885946,0.0002021006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005928485,0.00002585878,0.03176826,0.00001657282,0.000006141424,0.00003988732,0.0770095,3.523339e-7,0.00001456261,0.8902895,0.00005879606,0.0007112789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001051288,0.00005076591,0.01107286,0.00009529894,0.00002090607,0.000001734423,0.01841328,0.00005130845,0.0000306125,0.9589156,0.009777579,0.0005188035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.93866,0.0001751505,0.00008605429,0.006252581,0.0005965691,0.0005121864,0.00001051814,0.00004886594,0.05365808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967381,0.00003680788,0.00005687607,0.002239918,0.000485551,0.0000359331,0.000003035037,0.00002566666,0.0003780769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06862605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509696337","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0022","title":"Technological neutrality: recalibrating copyright in the information age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Normative; Law and economics; Technological change; Net neutrality; Jurisprudence; Copyright law; Intellectual property; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; The Internet","authors":[{"name":"Donna Craig","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02550113929871186,"gpt":0.2383122564895001,"spread":0.2128111171907882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001088346,0.0001534946,0.0001845855,0.0001318589,0.0001157409,0.0003446447,0.0005114329,0.0001433294,0.003470444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008253517,0.00006570812,0.00004655033,0.0005121378,0.02230669,0.002186693,0.0002271683,0.0002519167,0.0005442939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002975009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006686229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001880579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001708784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987968,0.00006265935,0.0004180062,0.0001683529,0.0002182427,0.0003358999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999215,0.0003874622,0.0000649979,0.0002819953,0.00004258719,0.000007971589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007027773,0.00003107243,0.000158494,0.00001868894,0.000001883343,0.00001055699,0.0002352539,3.866106e-7,0.000114228,0.9885009,0.003974345,0.006883907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003729303,0.00002348033,0.00009013632,0.00009364479,0.000005462492,0.000002539593,0.0004033333,0.001824999,0.0005800151,0.8938332,0.1025903,0.0001799707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1730391,0.00004709137,0.04252963,0.02949026,0.0003917302,0.0007612315,0.000003220019,0.0003839855,0.7533537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911246,0.000006216726,0.00005084554,0.00853951,0.0001952676,0.0000353161,0.000006482296,0.000008103419,0.00003362137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8180855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057609726","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1154","title":"The Worth of Citizenship in an Unequal World","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Entitlement (fair division); Politics; Legitimacy; Scrutiny; Sociology; Economic Justice; Obligation; Population; Function (biology); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03522674584828078,"gpt":0.40109550790755,"spread":0.3658687620592692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00284167,0.00006697234,0.0001272971,0.00004966381,0.0002580219,0.00005305239,0.0002908054,0.00008437815,0.0002441997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004713982,0.00004996383,0.00005638295,0.0005238519,0.0514355,0.00008569892,0.00003645724,0.0002725504,0.00001192886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007560669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004389876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001524634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008869139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985727,0.0003518967,0.0003340653,0.0001166204,0.0002722555,0.0003524466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977653,0.001857534,0.00004688093,0.0001800223,0.00005940977,0.00009087966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005633173,0.00003874112,0.003822041,0.000001542483,0.000002961281,0.000003340698,0.01542139,0.000005117373,0.00001531397,0.979921,0.0001995155,0.0005126939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001545093,0.00003903378,0.000823098,0.00002791126,0.000002704494,2.120308e-7,0.02227653,0.00002901939,0.0002104959,0.9699697,0.006382426,0.00008436557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5756696,0.00009385125,0.004769451,0.005152456,0.0006703311,0.000222849,0.000002594239,0.00005005359,0.4133688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998804,0.00005442695,0.00008817344,0.0006623305,0.0001206567,0.000005043766,0.00000114082,0.000006071773,0.0002582103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4231343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9511459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141357239","doi":"10.1515/til-2013-004","title":"The Montreal Protocol Protection of Ozone and Climate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Ozone layer; Greenhouse gas; Kyoto Protocol; Environmental science; Climate change; Environmental protection; Ozone; Treaty; Protocol (science); Natural resource economics; Meteorology; Political science; Geography; Ecology; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"D. W. Fahey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009596809917588154,"gpt":0.2302407303279762,"spread":0.2206439204103881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002340089,0.00006899188,0.00009447903,0.000001452967,0.000116781,0.00005453283,0.00009660253,0.00004913261,0.001161942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005055209,0.00003913142,0.00001527203,0.00006636705,0.01829344,0.0001279923,0.00001997061,0.00009818728,0.00002175987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001347872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006125006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002096225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006761637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993842,0.00005303201,0.000175709,0.0001073633,0.00009387282,0.0001858522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996175,0.0001615348,0.00004117912,0.0001160396,0.00001901128,0.00004476319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001440977,0.00001558494,0.006956004,0.0000515411,0.000003927447,0.000001161931,0.0001649776,0.00002817778,0.0002920077,0.9732346,0.00002361606,0.01908431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001065371,0.0005678183,0.03632884,0.0001072822,0.00001039969,0.00002540621,0.001202578,0.01117201,0.01461023,0.9331302,0.001454193,0.0003256823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8910311,0.00006214422,0.002331097,0.001258238,0.0001082729,0.03046428,0.00001471333,0.00006025158,0.07466986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998337,0.00000581987,0.0001807964,0.00004055786,0.00003557889,0.00137204,0.000001759727,0.000001606217,0.00002489015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1073058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290766374","doi":"10.1515/til-2022-0015","title":"Bilateral labor agreements as migration governance tools: An analysis from a gender lens","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Gender equality; Work (physics); Human rights; Political science; Inequality; Gender inequality; Gender diversity; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Law; Engineering; Management","authors":[{"name":"Jenna Hennebry","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicola Piper","is_ca":true},{"name":"Hari KC","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kira Williams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04108246071455485,"gpt":0.3428963459407654,"spread":0.3018138852262106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005849614,0.0001117381,0.000179419,0.00005558159,0.0004819114,0.0001515516,0.0004185774,0.00005754823,0.01379007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001204253,0.0001095808,0.00008258798,0.0005516827,0.007587027,0.0005464318,0.0001381213,0.0001705747,0.00004214916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002886597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006166813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005035877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005168909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978294,0.000512099,0.0002621648,0.0003023161,0.0007889277,0.0003050534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993883,0.0001800375,0.00006944584,0.0002127442,0.00007583347,0.00007368047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001051964,0.000132363,0.009110811,8.561793e-7,0.00008579197,0.00001286475,0.01404535,0.0003147896,0.00005654251,0.9759386,0.0000868295,0.0001099969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005259375,0.0001923834,0.008661285,0.000007344828,0.0001750893,5.021358e-7,0.006275719,0.001415857,0.0003900061,0.8850322,0.09692889,0.0003947347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432774,0.00004540815,0.001173002,0.002692676,0.0004448434,0.0001634158,0.0003744248,0.00005575283,0.05177308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954652,0.00002829692,0.0001765377,0.003261105,0.0001970373,0.00005337298,0.0002044816,0.00001013011,0.0006038112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09684206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965277367","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1258","title":"Comparative Taxation and Legal Theory: The Tax Design Case of the Transplant of General Anti-Avoidance Rules","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax reform; Tax law; Tax avoidance; Public economics; Indirect tax; Double taxation; Law and economics; Economics; Direct tax","authors":[{"name":"Carlo Garbarino","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02000444795618363,"gpt":0.2674586854296543,"spread":0.2474542374734707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008283937,0.0001134502,0.0002080744,0.00003799799,0.0001421797,0.00007687571,0.0002057531,0.00006395877,0.0001520834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001769537,0.00006071623,0.00003995217,0.0001640754,0.01968047,0.0003121133,0.00006639503,0.0002247849,0.00000421911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003021089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001113153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002673492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001521207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992246,0.0001241911,0.0002515443,0.0001262498,0.0001429419,0.0001304452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991226,0.000298795,0.0002744811,0.0002073277,0.00008933325,0.000007485026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008851849,0.00003956879,0.0005668798,0.00003394163,0.00001053149,0.000007861857,0.001353201,0.00006159684,0.004194891,0.9934731,0.0000515869,0.0001183329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008819159,0.00003895268,0.003851973,0.0001244688,0.0001017252,0.00007993125,0.002643574,0.01128879,0.05189669,0.9233466,0.00543349,0.0003119386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.974462,0.00005114401,0.01644298,0.0006480311,0.0002105098,0.0002590128,0.00001167021,0.00001518756,0.007899408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990842,0.000003399575,0.0002975524,0.0003865605,0.0001663573,0.000009724526,0.000003015833,0.000007811944,0.00004140084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07012653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008109300","doi":"10.1515/til-2020-0002","title":"25 Years of Elder Law: An Integrative and Historical Account of the Field of Law and Aging","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Elder Abuse and Neglect","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Constructive; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Sociology; Political science; History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Israel Doron","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0244286914933049,"gpt":0.3279550088564711,"spread":0.3035263173631662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002360386,0.00005825192,0.0001954538,0.00001141227,0.00005708704,0.000008492287,0.0001674117,0.00007748622,0.00007483153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002426101,0.00004200044,0.00002924481,0.0001182145,0.02262071,0.0001045242,0.0000964883,0.0001356818,1.23488e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001632962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002274363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008732881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005292007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992278,0.000190004,0.0001824268,0.0001137352,0.0001765833,0.0001094752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992102,0.0005469099,0.00005180484,0.0001016016,0.00003872765,0.00005070688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003868917,0.00002436767,0.000450772,0.00001601584,0.000005847382,7.330519e-7,0.06247908,1.354025e-7,0.0004081164,0.9359228,0.00003377457,0.0006196701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000345094,0.0004727079,0.0001651664,0.0002908877,0.00004038897,5.660553e-7,0.008351901,0.00002748041,0.03343862,0.9527008,0.004021795,0.0001445947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8992775,0.000962825,0.001219699,0.005485896,0.0001644237,0.0002353398,0.000006027889,0.00001999156,0.09262826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981219,0.0001329716,0.0001169519,0.001578156,0.0000366578,0.000001621636,1.508894e-7,0.000004141403,0.000007519917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0988443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9800392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125020779","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0011","title":"Informal Workers’ Aggregation and Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Workforce; Informal sector; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Informal education; Business; Sociology; Economic growth; Political science; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Routh Supriya","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03575435948051943,"gpt":0.3792886883178452,"spread":0.3435343288373258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050933,0.0001170203,0.0001857772,0.00002998646,0.0004024836,0.000008597214,0.00008918384,0.0001374939,0.0007471248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017529,0.00006851328,0.00002179296,0.00007617331,0.02941806,0.0002435518,0.0002353433,0.0001852271,0.0001473108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003505296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001764904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002264625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007612609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988122,0.0001798742,0.0003311267,0.0001473831,0.0001338569,0.000395532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987713,0.0008885398,0.0000528964,0.0001636442,0.00005046406,0.00007318116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001014283,0.00001021696,0.04623728,0.0000271276,0.000008373973,0.000001744145,0.002844144,3.346217e-8,0.00001452526,0.9474865,0.000566797,0.002701862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001236584,0.0001081667,0.003652093,0.0005409347,0.00001229052,8.732486e-7,0.00184362,0.000003934482,0.0002194286,0.9567229,0.03546887,0.0001902566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5495085,0.0002329899,0.009087462,0.0233036,0.0008887571,0.000675096,0.00001606376,0.000212152,0.4160754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963762,0.00006582746,0.00008466197,0.002333366,0.0001801826,0.00006012623,0.000002414947,0.00001235767,0.0008848499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4468677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9732233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971249996","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1150","title":"The Critical Modernism of Hannah Arendt","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Trilogy; Modernism (music); Successor cardinal; Politics; Metaphysics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Literature; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Mark Antaki","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02380308296743102,"gpt":0.3541619359858111,"spread":0.3303588530183801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001207217,0.0001560387,0.0002662334,0.00004502695,0.0005457767,0.0001066489,0.000610769,0.0001850161,0.0003760954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002177943,0.0001164132,0.0001092361,0.0002329708,0.2175635,0.0001765364,0.0001550452,0.0003012817,0.00007192753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007920022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009401259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002691643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001797031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972093,0.0005877373,0.0004978277,0.0002557396,0.0006342978,0.000815172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963249,0.002915236,0.00004281371,0.0003805627,0.0001524029,0.0001841165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003767487,0.0001048787,0.00006892684,0.00001034825,0.000004305544,0.000007799338,0.001279982,0.000006457904,0.00003754993,0.9979587,0.000350254,0.0001330965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001396914,0.00004994824,0.00002454775,0.000028139,0.00001059777,8.500946e-7,0.0005881421,0.0001118215,0.0009063502,0.9865496,0.01144559,0.0001447109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01171255,0.0004057849,0.03121561,0.04232455,0.0008108934,0.0003140291,0.0000390906,0.0001455711,0.9130319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982294,0.00001364845,0.0002915248,0.0005988395,0.0006220079,0.00002384313,0.000002813181,0.00001905103,0.0001989057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7845659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063592555","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1023","title":"Criminal Theory in the Twentieth Century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Culpability; Public law; Comparative law; Political science; Common law; Normative; Punishment (psychology); Presumption; Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"George P. Fletcher","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02771342401952274,"gpt":0.3424754771634526,"spread":0.3147620531439298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002405294,0.0001027667,0.0001547298,0.0000939583,0.0003537652,0.0001172887,0.0004522327,0.0000946552,0.00172836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004148054,0.00007344499,0.00008549561,0.0007471234,0.03397521,0.0001558362,0.00005523238,0.0002976113,0.00006193895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007228495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004281602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006700864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002553144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978276,0.0009719941,0.0002361001,0.0001954796,0.0003596884,0.0004090729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987158,0.0009039703,0.00003174898,0.0002479786,0.00004307608,0.0000574232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008216484,0.00012092,0.000504335,0.000004798459,0.000004613206,0.00004074067,0.06691067,0.000007681663,0.000002967338,0.9234325,0.00006514178,0.008823522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001057174,0.00003394554,0.00009365527,0.00002004879,0.00007839132,0.000005497252,0.5377977,0.00003636168,0.000007815949,0.4461742,0.01554179,0.0001048845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7282083,0.0004653732,0.01673867,0.002811118,0.0006804515,0.0002223232,0.000001898868,0.00005442198,0.2508174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973811,0.0005591102,0.00004793241,0.001597624,0.000254557,0.00002311348,0.000002306204,0.000006749391,0.0001274995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4772582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801021333","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0005","title":"Schrödinger’s Robot: Privacy in Uncertain States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Doctrine; Intervention (counseling); Internet privacy; Optimism; Computer science; Privacy law; Nothing; Computer security; Psychology; Information privacy; Artificial intelligence; Law; Privacy policy; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ian Kerr","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03651674190837315,"gpt":0.3865891889344925,"spread":0.3500724470261194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002650639,0.0001325046,0.0002789062,0.00007692734,0.0001870194,0.0002113467,0.0004565996,0.0002724401,0.00131093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001547862,0.0001233269,0.00005381011,0.000398071,0.04074755,0.0004603133,0.0001460648,0.0005212899,0.0001509947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001933499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000175895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009337384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005774068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979061,0.000470299,0.0003023268,0.0002577169,0.0004309282,0.000632623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983481,0.001120255,0.00004841492,0.0002368169,0.00009913898,0.0001472861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003145984,0.00005868792,0.003632733,0.000012447,0.000003928365,0.000008483321,0.0400716,0.00006196724,0.00003598307,0.9557552,0.00008051904,0.0002469509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000303917,0.00006639527,0.0001673574,0.00008329315,0.000002583691,1.748838e-7,0.009086357,0.0001132624,0.0001096202,0.9829775,0.006905436,0.0001840953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6578759,0.0001626177,0.0009089613,0.03867381,0.0007529032,0.0005844391,0.000006176846,0.0001091569,0.3009261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968141,0.0001685286,0.000381274,0.002112949,0.0001397526,0.000009367423,0.00000397961,0.00001634737,0.0003536695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3389382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1644300354","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-110","title":"Sovereignty as Trusteeship and Indigenous Peoples","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Colonialism; Political science; Law; Paternalism; International law; Duty; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Evan Fox-Decent","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ian Dahlman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02848270113767715,"gpt":0.3320846004974409,"spread":0.3036018993597637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007070578,0.00009462566,0.0001422687,0.00002244777,0.0002069919,0.00006697301,0.0001740033,0.0001271723,0.001144659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003296994,0.00008427827,0.00002225339,0.00009208731,0.06000486,0.0001476516,0.0001021823,0.0001254514,0.0001374915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008591922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009591749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005894957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003978731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998835,0.0002582349,0.0001385196,0.0001578219,0.0002626123,0.0003478723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992766,0.0003046285,0.00002350057,0.000132097,0.00001014261,0.000253065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003401838,0.00003356088,0.002005598,0.000004329082,0.000002742042,0.000006987174,0.05223789,7.58847e-7,0.000002649295,0.9453512,0.00005430764,0.0002659686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002382583,0.00009302347,0.00009712623,0.00001086477,0.000005622469,0.000003606917,0.01646286,0.000001291167,0.0001685326,0.9726367,0.01015845,0.0001236547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4843878,0.000148187,0.00005782365,0.0006841961,0.00009560987,0.0001133476,0.000004461116,0.0000313628,0.5144771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997924,0.00008856523,0.0001124143,0.001213918,0.0002076632,0.00000866442,0.00000260132,0.000009870044,0.0004323109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5140448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095581877","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1007","title":"Communities of Judgment and Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Epistemology; Human rights; Set (abstract data type); Relation (database); Common sense; Sociology; Law; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Nedelsky","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04300944005400052,"gpt":0.3584844386553654,"spread":0.3154749986013649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006030497,0.00009838419,0.0002169904,0.0000584454,0.0004118888,0.00005158218,0.0003411746,0.00009651862,0.001012087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006767358,0.00008642981,0.00003289266,0.0001450604,0.1412201,0.0001767337,0.0001958772,0.0001709239,0.00001422766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000458336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001505826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001422911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001321865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986027,0.0004038948,0.000260409,0.0001059198,0.0002717879,0.0003552233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990626,0.0004799457,0.00003195135,0.0002268127,0.00005114524,0.0001475668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001693944,0.00008015718,0.0008864015,0.000008916233,0.000005593188,0.000005499553,0.009414659,4.254586e-7,0.0000146792,0.9894885,0.0000433785,0.00003480536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001772515,0.00008262804,0.00007332166,0.00004247321,0.000007234332,9.468546e-7,0.00208484,0.00000404287,0.0002838799,0.9854324,0.01170663,0.0001043205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4748594,0.00003619811,0.0004436628,0.002495823,0.00008653075,0.0001222114,0.00000583148,0.00004098908,0.5219094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992136,0.00001157175,0.0001030598,0.0004226089,0.0001365412,0.000008494024,0.000002986175,0.000007361358,0.00009372716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5243543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785381600","doi":"10.1515/til-2018-0009","title":"Class Action Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Proposition; Compensation (psychology); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Mechanism (biology); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Piché","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05043036617497085,"gpt":0.4048915222369855,"spread":0.3544611560620147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005329248,0.0000555244,0.00007738182,0.00001870752,0.0003872103,0.00006410408,0.000207794,0.00009113509,0.001098036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001533715,0.00004967559,0.00002676619,0.0002069547,0.08024656,0.0001378542,0.00006219574,0.0001176079,0.0003338484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000698201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004323053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001378956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002609631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991726,0.0001360694,0.0001276848,0.0001432734,0.0001769154,0.000243431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995227,0.0001571082,0.00002196897,0.0001693535,0.00005147691,0.00007734448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001098689,0.00002700675,0.00005621217,0.00000143778,0.000001680709,4.007621e-7,0.002989477,9.278893e-7,0.00008611404,0.9957721,0.0003205573,0.0007330956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006292995,0.0000240606,0.00002970502,0.000005568488,0.000002905775,2.421027e-7,0.00109713,0.00009787748,0.000816835,0.7282829,0.2695185,0.00006138809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07196297,0.00001244478,0.03569143,0.01089596,0.0004274556,0.0001901661,0.000003839541,0.0001197328,0.880696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973993,0.00001292282,0.0003505394,0.001054204,0.0007533375,0.00001704218,0.000001404053,0.00000642441,0.0004048242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089303589","doi":"10.1515/til-2020-0015","title":"Territorial Justice in Israel/Palestine","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Palestine; Compromise; Politics; State (computer science); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; History; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04675035597196315,"gpt":0.3338797192303954,"spread":0.2871293632584322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004944523,0.0001126351,0.0002285213,0.00002690509,0.000136234,0.00005282185,0.0002666957,0.0001103433,0.00008170032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001703947,0.0001053491,0.00003485381,0.0003031479,0.03445873,0.0001412228,0.0001388117,0.0002303581,0.00009462485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005608727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005071705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001938184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009128044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985679,0.0002532003,0.0002551379,0.0002326352,0.0002771686,0.0004139394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993072,0.0003725275,0.0000290526,0.00009781393,0.00004127181,0.0001521937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008293008,0.00003602959,0.005298318,0.00002028267,0.00000335127,0.00002683025,0.00962697,0.000002002304,0.00002090719,0.9836488,0.000142435,0.001091145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001514432,0.0002288642,0.000270724,0.0001193161,0.00004670385,0.000001173949,0.05878299,0.0001369879,0.0001950288,0.8934696,0.04476814,0.0004660512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3012039,0.001898223,0.009842827,0.04819075,0.007451038,0.000831892,0.00002706066,0.0003761285,0.6301782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947397,0.00003709831,0.0001806548,0.002156754,0.002810648,0.00001307147,0.000001926529,0.00001002345,0.00005008287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6935358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886905957","doi":"10.1515/til-2018-0028","title":"Indigenous Peoples, Political Economists and the Tragedy of the Commons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Indigenous; Commons; Politics; Population; Environmental ethics; Natural resource; Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Michel Morin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01912896356402754,"gpt":0.2792240625164411,"spread":0.2600950989524135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009878946,0.00008282175,0.000222444,0.00001154572,0.0008647315,0.00004524868,0.0003547633,0.0000890049,0.0001583001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007776741,0.00004618004,0.0000610573,0.0001354992,0.325917,0.00004420962,0.0001646079,0.000162878,0.000005946302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007856938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009312398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001875442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009988336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986053,0.000528806,0.0002081919,0.0001164498,0.0001709854,0.0003702648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982966,0.001363217,0.00004143574,0.0001806213,0.00004740798,0.00007070399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002873069,0.0000234729,0.0009716133,0.000004230519,0.00001039635,3.259479e-7,0.08534272,3.736394e-8,6.783974e-7,0.9133223,0.0001855872,0.0001098494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003908604,0.00003750005,0.001184961,0.00001603232,0.00001581348,6.502491e-7,0.01372042,0.000004710164,0.0000712271,0.9781946,0.006289357,0.00007384503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4742329,0.0008659266,0.0002969027,0.01172418,0.0005798998,0.0004365779,0.00001407693,0.00002851772,0.511821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985983,0.00006095761,0.0000181735,0.0008329633,0.0003178444,0.00001161279,2.515585e-7,0.000005400134,0.0001544878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5243654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6759175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123715249","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1259","title":"Tax Levels, Structures, and Reforms: Convergence or Persistence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Globalization; Tax competition; Tax reform; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Tax revenue; Ad valorem tax; Convergence (economics); Direct tax; International economics; Market economy; Public economics; Macroeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Neil Brooks","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thaddeus Hwong","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03215570590205604,"gpt":0.2716658884045457,"spread":0.2395101825024896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002423707,0.0001303406,0.0001524473,0.00005974481,0.0001225564,0.0002094934,0.0002152645,0.00009701074,0.004520524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003699854,0.00008721186,0.0000231325,0.0001822907,0.01737062,0.0006704096,0.0001653677,0.0002586078,0.00008193578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007664614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001011935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001032824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002067419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992069,0.000009067177,0.0001895839,0.0002136382,0.0001571592,0.0002236547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995892,0.00006057104,0.00006897141,0.0001993458,0.00006169805,0.00002022818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006148802,0.00001301275,0.0008011635,0.00004228855,0.00000323499,0.000008495387,0.0002287271,5.421513e-7,0.0003860631,0.9976329,0.000215591,0.0006065542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000498476,0.00002329151,0.001905875,0.00003840027,0.00001919123,0.00001100932,0.001417508,0.001024735,0.0008919192,0.7889154,0.2048983,0.0003559039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8195872,0.00009916277,0.00408021,0.003451693,0.001715053,0.0003364162,0.00001093923,0.0002218431,0.1704975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961389,0.000004664631,0.0003931388,0.002693834,0.0004268116,0.000006293767,0.000004733487,0.0000123211,0.0003192742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2087175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003235112","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1280","title":"The Efficacy of Regulation as a Function of Psychological Fit: Reexamining the Hard Law/Soft Law Continuum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hard law; Soft law; Law; Compliance (psychology); Perspective (graphical); Function (biology); Incentive; Philosophy of law; Psychology; Social psychology; Comparative law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; International law","authors":[{"name":"Deborah E. Rupp","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cynthia A. Williams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07379689688929711,"gpt":0.3491020111001863,"spread":0.2753051142108892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002416033,0.0001055775,0.0002421561,0.00001482041,0.0005379921,0.00005296875,0.0004061604,0.0001732294,0.0003323023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001009702,0.00005893622,0.00007556901,0.0002600208,0.06984992,0.0001717722,0.00007606051,0.0001934663,0.00001467305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002065098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002766921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001338817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001063284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980733,0.0005820252,0.0004802862,0.0001940871,0.0003929369,0.0002773993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978582,0.001429207,0.0002044504,0.0002851674,0.0001710353,0.000051929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000387771,0.00008042866,0.0002016204,0.000009915074,0.00001176732,6.99544e-7,0.0102404,8.414486e-7,0.0001262183,0.9879016,0.0001037964,0.0009349862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003212234,0.0003538658,0.002450479,0.00008758888,0.00002677329,9.318761e-7,0.003666084,0.000006151737,0.0009069573,0.9797868,0.01229322,0.00009991026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3225999,0.0002713679,0.002390805,0.001160659,0.0008126086,0.0004966523,0.000003360035,0.00006068118,0.672204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991361,0.00001656687,0.00004308238,0.0003741555,0.0002546742,0.00001666527,9.162418e-7,0.000008813206,0.0001490508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9326814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984682637","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1255","title":"Tax Transplants and Local Culture: A Comparative Study of the Chinese and Canadian GAAR","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Divergence (linguistics); China; Legal culture; Political science; Ideology; Law; Tax avoidance; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Jinyan Li","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01109259974519115,"gpt":0.2626718889119273,"spread":0.2515792891667362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000157716,0.00009908763,0.0001600127,0.00004470035,0.000113972,0.00008040644,0.0001234175,0.00005203114,0.0001544715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004500879,0.0000577133,0.00001301248,0.0001825712,0.01165803,0.0002041497,0.00005283852,0.0001936059,0.00000462864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003902068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007528108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01505457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1840523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999479,0.00002209651,0.0001401805,0.0001250775,0.0001030552,0.0001306136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997386,0.00003973067,0.00004414273,0.0001171422,0.00003866026,0.00002171346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003110792,0.00005613413,0.0302801,0.00001863894,0.0000066251,0.000002594875,0.005331047,0.000001721071,0.00006396079,0.9640666,0.00005585551,0.00008555693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005376928,0.0002323352,0.2680154,0.0001840276,0.0001877921,0.00001935002,0.04211991,0.005482143,0.0005738796,0.6340767,0.04274437,0.0009871318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804928,0.0000269002,0.0001144927,0.0003973029,0.0001406427,0.0002196141,0.000004674036,0.00001064394,0.01859293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999253,0.000001289299,0.0000131924,0.0005934074,0.00009927779,0.000006149646,0.000002111921,0.000005223927,0.00002631203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3299899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046776891","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1292","title":"Something Old, Something New? Re-theorizing Patriarchal Relations and Privatization from the Outskirts of Family Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Family law; Law; Gender studies; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Shelley A. M. Gavigan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05923891985154026,"gpt":0.3502944301557225,"spread":0.2910555103041823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002652314,0.000157012,0.0002849951,0.00002781994,0.001065991,0.0001043272,0.0002811019,0.0002045439,0.000132148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00308814,0.0001082756,0.00006381207,0.0003197602,0.03566414,0.0006761087,0.0002800212,0.0004012303,0.00001143418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003282002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004474942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004079909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975126,0.0008929829,0.0004290584,0.0002108763,0.0004955647,0.0004588527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950947,0.004339713,0.0001447409,0.0001944653,0.00009086912,0.0001354705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001643297,0.00002019566,0.006344229,0.000004835316,0.00002093585,2.598115e-7,0.185102,0.000007785482,0.0002144812,0.8076488,0.00004480507,0.0005752409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003287392,0.00002134167,0.002239584,0.0001073519,0.00004878483,1.700561e-7,0.05445883,0.00004704743,0.0003810904,0.9369991,0.005167731,0.0002002216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8840249,0.003146854,0.04399739,0.0211825,0.001191867,0.0009330229,0.00003500396,0.0001768198,0.04531165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993959,0.0001204896,0.004285904,0.0008473684,0.0006896551,0.00001045495,0.000007045991,0.00001474003,0.00006537107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1306432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9669603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036475377","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-008","title":"Corporate Fiduciary Duties and Prudential Regulation of Financial Institutions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Corporation; Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Corporate law; Shareholder; Liability; Law; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Supreme court; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Edward Iacobucci","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09868123007834605,"gpt":0.3569908371897059,"spread":0.2583096071113598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005920989,0.00005321408,0.0001067984,0.00002931533,0.0001845478,0.00003548235,0.0001163127,0.00008200496,0.00007901354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003530392,0.00004999926,0.00001802823,0.0001887694,0.0385262,0.0001912937,0.00007973522,0.00008064388,0.000007473385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002259777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001521174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002719667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992749,0.000106436,0.0001851748,0.0001104297,0.0001866326,0.0001364073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995786,0.00007531753,0.00006554081,0.0001096309,0.00008958907,0.0000813043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002246388,0.00003373397,0.0004971514,0.000004179899,0.000001259835,5.092889e-7,0.004581972,0.00002478784,0.00005549368,0.9944305,0.0001518077,0.0001961804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001786598,0.00002583496,0.000751133,0.00001473126,0.000006991772,5.590205e-7,0.0008271023,0.00006685503,0.0004293319,0.9821994,0.01543197,0.00006738336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7972743,0.0001255799,0.02320221,0.003960727,0.000393827,0.0003749359,0.00002500755,0.00006300714,0.1745804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991659,0.00001560291,0.0004404807,0.0001131532,0.0001539664,0.000013081,0.000005235125,0.000003192838,0.00008941082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2018916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9640904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517679917","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0023","title":"Intellectual property, antitrust, and the rule of law: between private power and state power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tying; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Private law; Public law; Law; Competition law; Rule of law; Competition (biology); State (computer science); Economics; Power (physics); Politics; Political science; Monopoly; Market economy; Computer science; Microeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Ariel Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0462665861976401,"gpt":0.2363629440686333,"spread":0.1900963578709932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008183313,0.0001942125,0.0003408006,0.00006894727,0.0001457463,0.0001354404,0.0002586814,0.00008366677,0.001080058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006073315,0.00007838001,0.00004373221,0.0001427389,0.04489322,0.0004789928,0.0005794583,0.0001630439,0.0001014865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009031822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007476641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006636952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000397572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987881,0.00007046986,0.0003638967,0.0002572556,0.0001983356,0.0003219415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989303,0.0006487543,0.00008026164,0.0002285232,0.00009276856,0.00001933243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007121866,0.00002972593,0.001074535,0.00004976231,0.00003061094,0.00000291236,0.001333938,1.70613e-7,0.0002271727,0.9952282,0.0001906082,0.001120151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002372698,0.0001171977,0.0003086488,0.0003021568,0.00004946563,0.000004543921,0.000184424,0.0001266963,0.003777396,0.955994,0.03641332,0.0003494265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.886426,0.0001474362,0.004536437,0.003710015,0.000188288,0.0004645546,0.000009677267,0.00005265971,0.1044649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975818,0.00004009897,0.00003606289,0.001915312,0.00009397607,0.000008402116,0.000001862626,0.00002479013,0.0002976629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1111558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119769935","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1027","title":"Harm and Fault in Discrimination Law: The Transition from Intentional to Adverse Effect Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Statute; Law; Context (archaeology); Legal doctrine; Employment discrimination; Liability; Harm; Malice; Political science; Jurisdiction; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Denise G. Réaume","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02107537109339203,"gpt":0.3369209354750022,"spread":0.3158455643816102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008106411,0.00008626006,0.0001060703,0.00003679001,0.0002874971,0.00007162183,0.0001583975,0.00007389663,0.0001556428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001645913,0.00006341092,0.00003214747,0.0002181285,0.01117413,0.0002771233,0.00005048731,0.000158226,0.00002079583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001026515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001457888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001701943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005929465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988664,0.0002907728,0.0001904512,0.0002009356,0.0002374428,0.0002140076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993159,0.0004390682,0.0000247664,0.0001173162,0.00003839424,0.00006461549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006289197,0.00005116282,0.0001828578,0.000003262725,0.000002328621,0.000001525246,0.01886182,0.00002891175,0.0001118188,0.9781054,0.00001374894,0.002574315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004420936,0.0000657726,0.003808101,0.00007096591,0.00002181625,7.819426e-7,0.01250193,0.0008513895,0.0002792989,0.9765291,0.005279457,0.0001493186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8950559,0.00002837904,0.03926762,0.02934451,0.0001423178,0.0006358934,0.00002796469,0.00003914047,0.03545831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985874,0.0000313453,0.0001339574,0.0009216875,0.0001242924,0.0001059382,0.00003791777,0.000006530251,0.00005098756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1035315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036875568","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1107","title":"Conflicts of Interest in Publicly-Traded and Closely-Held Corporations: A Comparative and Economic Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Negotiation; Transaction cost; Adjudication; Business; Liability; Law and economics; Database transaction; Economics; Law; Finance; Marketing; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Zohar Goshen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09212785268488419,"gpt":0.2867827677545304,"spread":0.1946549150696462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003323514,0.0001327978,0.0003824386,0.0002234227,0.00003713002,0.0001490435,0.0001168031,0.00006760299,0.0002719907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004004847,0.0001217671,0.00003468194,0.0003975124,0.009686806,0.0008467041,0.0001395347,0.0001236445,0.00001483796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002600343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000943435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003512564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007469713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991245,0.00002249155,0.0003929343,0.0002348211,0.00005681144,0.0001684958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994745,0.0001301604,0.0001852742,0.0001556163,0.00003850997,0.00001598321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008095555,0.00005417516,0.0343715,0.00002508976,0.00003750226,0.000002213989,0.0003703393,0.00006633074,0.00004704523,0.9646474,0.00006976955,0.0002276467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002534512,0.00007618843,0.03533632,0.0001505679,0.0002919399,0.000003735195,0.002028334,0.04712613,0.001016328,0.8963207,0.01446561,0.0006496441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886153,0.0001354295,0.0004770456,0.001387731,0.00003580097,0.0001515281,0.000007811715,0.0000164791,0.009172894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989388,0.00002703655,0.000088463,0.0007710485,0.000117962,0.00001175641,0.00001850817,0.000006997296,0.0000194191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06832674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963547191","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1139","title":"Functionalism and Political Economy in the Comparative Study of Consumer Insolvency: An Unfinished Story from England and Wales","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Ideology; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Economics; Economy; Market economy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Iain Ramsay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03833989309812411,"gpt":0.3380792953903343,"spread":0.2997394022922102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005962109,0.00007229414,0.0001661069,0.00002435238,0.0001872904,0.00005378999,0.0001274532,0.00005604926,0.0000582022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003594775,0.00005325067,0.0000105257,0.00008084851,0.02755463,0.0001244276,0.00004623906,0.0001548836,0.000001200572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002128055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000345775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002291334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005912818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988286,0.0005322527,0.0001915738,0.0001700664,0.0001136139,0.0001639189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987397,0.001023873,0.00003084654,0.0001252338,0.00002967917,0.00005071016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002585596,0.0002766777,0.0148236,0.00000179611,0.000004532053,0.000001042741,0.03240521,0.000001257991,0.00000438748,0.9524021,0.00001696839,0.00003663425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006070939,0.00009381032,0.01985526,0.000005604191,0.00001230722,3.836639e-7,0.04547125,0.00004441891,0.00001179716,0.9233368,0.01048246,0.00007877794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631681,0.0001094505,0.0001370175,0.001704115,0.00002707306,0.0002659799,0.00001995698,0.000008449098,0.03455987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995608,0.000004259757,0.00004874148,0.0002376227,0.00009675112,0.00003470477,0.000007697574,0.000003028913,0.00000636091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03639274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9750918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W577197919","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0004","title":"Organizing: Should the Employer Have a Say?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Freedom of association; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Legislation; Law; Jurisdiction; Labour law; Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Pnina Alon-Shenker","is_ca":true},{"name":"Guy Davidov","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04289689264298002,"gpt":0.3436806157805566,"spread":0.3007837231375766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008932487,0.00009526472,0.000118839,0.00002114449,0.0004299765,0.00008307857,0.0004284942,0.0001005047,0.003803378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005925792,0.00004459413,0.00003851724,0.0001858996,0.06406705,0.0001488406,0.0001403855,0.0001217148,0.00004270858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007215061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005541862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001424675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000762869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998637,0.0002873627,0.0001775079,0.0001740841,0.0003228532,0.0004011836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988873,0.0006480627,0.00002768858,0.0002792838,0.00006518418,0.00009246609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001060813,0.00003473786,0.0008892464,5.005435e-7,0.000006900393,0.000003054852,0.006078,7.29347e-8,0.0001502063,0.9907209,0.00121074,0.000894994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001815964,0.00002603365,0.0003184482,0.00002033346,0.000007006945,2.753591e-7,0.002075818,7.581895e-7,0.0006513571,0.8161662,0.1804543,0.0000979597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1700529,0.0001555619,0.02912509,0.2847749,0.001428112,0.0007706844,0.00003592846,0.0003037018,0.5133532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908951,0.00004272163,0.00005959998,0.006790978,0.0002830437,0.00001421578,5.205073e-7,0.00001411801,0.001899687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8208423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514070696","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0016","title":"The policy battle over information and digital policy regulation: a canadian perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Public relations; Grassroots; Public policy; Influencer marketing; Legislation; Public interest; Political science; Business; Marketing; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Geist","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007625764211486596,"gpt":0.3039728308897685,"spread":0.2963470666782819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000359374,0.00006237633,0.00006443202,0.000105167,0.0004816967,0.0002970566,0.000130288,0.00008109038,0.0002210096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003118945,0.00003581747,0.00001944556,0.000232062,0.03167334,0.001033454,0.00004399433,0.00005236251,0.00005393571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000382021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003811769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02438589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01370542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992182,0.00008913883,0.0001478272,0.00007982032,0.0002059178,0.000259152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990179,0.0005594525,0.00003529004,0.0001250818,0.00009300506,0.0001692925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001841833,0.000002911081,0.000116891,6.161437e-7,0.000001726757,1.842389e-7,0.009479423,3.222534e-7,0.000004456433,0.9852419,0.0007335327,0.004399588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001855912,0.00001469346,0.000533045,0.00001852433,8.841562e-7,6.641206e-7,0.00440492,0.00002007974,0.00001853134,0.8988806,0.09585965,0.00006281741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01620923,0.00005362667,0.004630831,0.1552219,0.0002733415,0.0002632729,0.00003565001,0.00006076497,0.8232514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855,0.00003825528,0.00002173428,0.0007396775,0.0003224578,0.000007855374,0.000001650097,0.000003497353,0.000314872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231325389","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1169","title":"Closing the Gap","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Luck; Epistemology; Action (physics); Inference; Philosophy; Rest (music); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Sociology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Ripstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05008031918610636,"gpt":0.3192618937435698,"spread":0.2691815745574634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000726286,0.00009969848,0.0001001406,0.0000263476,0.0001775327,0.00004848321,0.0003748974,0.00005786141,0.0004640019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006265223,0.00005931105,0.00004016086,0.0002614869,0.05992785,0.00009805559,0.0001322562,0.0002390954,0.000135072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001949094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007874803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000196069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003069329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988441,0.0001194188,0.0002129265,0.0002153525,0.0002153834,0.0003927509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986438,0.0009730238,0.00002478329,0.0002899361,0.0000106258,0.0000578807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003107278,0.00003108709,0.00005670921,0.000003360977,4.541283e-7,0.00003785721,0.0004843817,0.000002342689,0.01558308,0.9823818,0.00009872857,0.001289163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001142753,0.00003616533,0.00003622389,0.00001587641,0.000002497442,0.00001833474,0.0001167177,0.0001006903,0.1751803,0.8196332,0.004649791,0.00009583412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3931716,0.0001160725,0.06280603,0.004529502,0.001153545,0.0002695165,0.000004345734,0.0001596329,0.5377898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950371,0.000009630941,0.0001011611,0.004527101,0.0001859119,0.000003437424,2.681911e-7,0.00001143407,0.000123917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6018655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9426305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321602674","doi":"10.1515/til-2023-0011","title":"Good faith in employment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Fair dealing; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Scope (computer science); Business; Law; Bad faith; Transformative learning; Political science; Good faith; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Sabine Tsuruda","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02533934397680164,"gpt":0.2546357473286037,"spread":0.229296403351802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004360165,0.0001515524,0.0002134996,0.0002136552,0.00008309687,0.0001759389,0.0002555123,0.0000727743,0.001248121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000166399,0.0001229684,0.00004093893,0.0006291631,0.008432965,0.0004097771,0.0002767475,0.0001645722,0.001463729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003038584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008700748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003890393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002818357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988299,0.00001727144,0.0002880555,0.0002577796,0.0002072334,0.0003997851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995939,0.00007986806,0.00004407443,0.0002390832,0.00002997225,0.00001312159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003815812,0.00005937632,0.00269535,0.00003728089,0.00000337705,0.00008113905,0.0001262295,0.00001941872,0.00002457131,0.9959964,0.0007091078,0.0002096618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004309509,0.00001141766,0.001314821,0.00005678504,0.000006164368,4.715663e-7,0.0001287726,0.0005733765,0.00006891638,0.9806792,0.01654689,0.0001822955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8759248,0.00001640441,0.0004184744,0.001907369,0.0004327841,0.0002437929,0.000001775383,0.0002927256,0.1207619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974502,0.000003553113,0.00001890812,0.001447984,0.0004676098,0.00002945876,0.00002553854,0.00002427868,0.0005324295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1215255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513990116","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0019","title":"Taking notice seriously: information delivery and consumer contract formation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Boilerplate text; Obligation; Normative; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Jane Radin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01781268920850916,"gpt":0.2376327657073595,"spread":0.2198200764988504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004988236,0.0001316814,0.0001587947,0.00009036685,0.0001387342,0.0002789843,0.0001129591,0.0001344778,0.0003821156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004319397,0.00009037915,0.00002283825,0.0001485078,0.00945319,0.005324535,0.0001397782,0.0001274726,0.0002103269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002424551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009758633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005518853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002803113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991382,0.00001750684,0.0003123504,0.0001092472,0.0001754643,0.0002471686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992624,0.000256441,0.0001543425,0.0001400082,0.0001736343,0.00001317826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001023974,0.00001203087,0.0007509816,0.0001083537,0.000004649834,0.000002190045,0.0001593058,0.000002843362,0.0001293876,0.9881748,0.00007194135,0.01048112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003218598,0.00002566774,0.003246242,0.0006416925,0.00007872871,0.0000217081,0.0005700589,0.007003671,0.0007622042,0.8951409,0.08853696,0.0007535664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7426257,0.0001175975,0.16987,0.01056568,0.0009202887,0.0005035279,0.000009584415,0.0002964585,0.07509114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934133,0.00003046511,0.0001056439,0.006215932,0.0001955188,0.0000105106,0.00001119953,0.00001031139,0.000007075482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2507876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474951546","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0017","title":"Technological tattletales and constitutional black holes: communications intermediaries and constitutional constraints","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; State (computer science); Constraint (computer-aided design); Business; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03281549725311105,"gpt":0.3141082639295648,"spread":0.2812927666764538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007290178,0.0001327043,0.0002182317,0.00005651861,0.0005756622,0.00009321446,0.000360541,0.000228537,0.0005232145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001055127,0.00008697145,0.00003126304,0.0001061694,0.9995852,0.0002573536,0.000294604,0.0001869062,0.00003353327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005630765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000161912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.397314e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001231232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986867,0.0002572561,0.0002679983,0.0002495965,0.0002265015,0.0003119509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978078,0.001667431,0.00004710168,0.0002516918,0.00008004694,0.0001459285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001672166,0.00005518208,0.001472363,0.00000563439,0.00001352396,0.00000784887,0.001255213,6.408729e-8,0.00005939987,0.9953045,0.00007956327,0.001729963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004855289,0.00002954621,0.000004279567,0.0001012959,0.00001222211,0.000021565,0.002200491,0.000006799834,0.00009587473,0.9855843,0.01129759,0.0001604794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001637629,0.0002567676,0.9784599,0.008839916,0.0001380459,0.0001865764,0.00008889537,0.00009095432,0.01030133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978197,0.0007077804,0.0009484374,0.0003545679,0.00007885198,0.00001970248,0.000007353668,0.000003339016,0.00006025653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5728832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2036014529","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1249","title":"An Examination of Convergence and Resistance in Global Tax Reform Trends","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Jurisdiction; Convergence (economics); Tax reform; Political science; Politics; Value-added tax; Political economy; Face value; Economics; Law; Economic growth","authors":[{"name":"Kathryn James","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01136061955675616,"gpt":0.2585174977168316,"spread":0.2471568781600754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000490672,0.00008403345,0.0001293649,0.00007629206,0.00003333222,0.000051341,0.0001406547,0.00006410744,0.0003598121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009138732,0.00007513155,0.00001182543,0.000461845,0.008220898,0.0006298656,0.00005737131,0.0001115736,0.000006793623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002153491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005811861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005034653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001817583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993253,0.00001639228,0.0002311101,0.0001667884,0.000127008,0.0001333803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996146,0.00002358172,0.0001172289,0.0001705876,0.00006299488,0.00001098075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000527343,0.00004587476,0.006735891,0.00003563493,6.834792e-7,0.000002641883,0.0000787336,7.105668e-7,0.0006764263,0.9895931,0.00001347399,0.002764116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005163711,0.00001572155,0.1119843,0.00005034168,0.000005186275,6.411231e-7,0.0003432169,0.001457089,0.0004798184,0.8831993,0.001771581,0.0001763697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8937585,0.00001583506,0.0009260369,0.0004615557,0.0001635793,0.00005107963,0.000003905746,0.00002326536,0.1045962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992001,0.000003321476,0.0003325257,0.0002914413,0.00009536096,0.000005894546,0.000009889525,0.000005236003,0.00005619564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1063937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985756541","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1181","title":"Comment on David Enoch's Luck Between Morality, Law, and Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Luck; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Ori Simchen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05411186062236185,"gpt":0.334994920031379,"spread":0.2808830594090172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008025316,0.0001865431,0.00023969,0.00004298646,0.000200563,0.00006718311,0.000324009,0.000110447,0.0001870112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003732592,0.0001511333,0.00003546989,0.0001770494,0.03971325,0.0001280701,0.0002815146,0.0003177654,0.00007105459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003768118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006330156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001564214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005119218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982641,0.0001961855,0.0003312345,0.0004002186,0.0003210669,0.0004872421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978538,0.001558206,0.00004220848,0.0003524435,0.00001598322,0.0001773624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007308742,0.00009746937,0.0001688872,0.000032294,0.000001913507,0.00005153908,0.0004490052,0.000001814294,0.001360421,0.9970017,0.0002461799,0.0005156786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005085082,0.0003449403,0.0002064708,0.00006542019,0.00003261831,0.000008886997,0.0001372415,0.00004833979,0.1156414,0.8595532,0.02316662,0.0002864318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5041683,0.00009588692,0.02214077,0.03698308,0.001237669,0.0006929557,0.00009145747,0.000285364,0.4343045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688199,0.0000152357,0.0001997463,0.03066414,0.0002329088,0.000005180075,0.000003127654,0.0000175741,0.00004224859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4646515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122093128","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1253","title":"Ordinary People, Necessary Choices: A Comparative Study of Childcare Expenses","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legislature; Flexibility (engineering); Tax deduction; Context (archaeology); Baseline (sea); Variety (cybernetics); Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Order (exchange); Actuarial science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gross income; Tax reform; Computer science; Management; Finance; State income tax","authors":[{"name":"Tsilly Dagan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02928007342463327,"gpt":0.3613706878434686,"spread":0.3320906144188353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007456337,0.000155322,0.0004774703,0.00006225798,0.0003748133,0.00007973929,0.000484176,0.0001482269,0.0006562799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003560996,0.000128182,0.00004918269,0.0005148886,0.03286366,0.0003551841,0.0001460863,0.0003636449,0.00001598875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002099949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000971426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00549637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02083028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981352,0.0003643628,0.0004112682,0.0002770167,0.0004703038,0.0003418489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987768,0.0005506672,0.0001221316,0.0002552912,0.0001751535,0.000119935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007255202,0.0004558135,0.008000316,0.00002204198,0.00001417192,0.000005352518,0.1180744,0.000001968887,0.00008380888,0.8731049,0.00006127741,0.0001033746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001610818,0.001222916,0.004151821,0.0001727135,0.00005759553,0.000004126739,0.4608971,0.00002473742,0.001160342,0.5190254,0.0110224,0.0006499488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.845971,0.0001001564,0.00009868355,0.000294028,0.0004899041,0.0004940844,0.000005643772,0.00005313814,0.1524933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938,0.00001010318,0.00004168589,0.0001115342,0.0003398958,0.00004796578,0.000002268127,0.00001147124,0.00005507726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3540795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886156249","doi":"10.1515/til-2024-0021","title":"Imagining how U.S. federalism would affect third-party funding regulation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Government (linguistics); Legalization; Enforcement; Commission; State (computer science); Accountability; Normative; Federal law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04278326659619959,"gpt":0.2825691421958507,"spread":0.2397858755996511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007147407,0.0001771716,0.0003206856,0.0001562319,0.0001364616,0.0004748125,0.0001669039,0.0002282618,0.0007561676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002478998,0.00018192,0.0001147494,0.0003816654,0.00633128,0.0004934608,0.0000856565,0.000347439,0.0003730351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001376769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001464756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001333288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004263175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987064,0.00003704272,0.0003867164,0.0004159251,0.00007039155,0.000383544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994464,0.0001483097,0.00006490291,0.0002382921,0.00002104921,0.0000810529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001777695,0.00001646815,0.0009301421,0.00003840516,0.00001056207,0.00001096054,0.0005935957,0.00003062131,0.00004205648,0.996331,0.001327209,0.0006511911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001672887,0.00003601596,0.0008988494,0.00008243687,0.000004811645,0.000006361848,0.0001159231,0.00506288,0.0003154015,0.930207,0.06287239,0.0002306633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1724067,0.006890511,0.2679367,0.0346945,0.004546063,0.000603777,0.0001261296,0.0007019826,0.5120936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784,0.00004462189,0.0003448738,0.0006818968,0.0002422258,0.00001889198,0.00002021763,0.00002794083,0.0007792981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193824776","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0015","title":"Property’s Sovereignty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Larissa Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0480782264763015,"gpt":0.3631084027986167,"spread":0.3150301763223152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008617181,0.0001031937,0.0001776327,0.00001972994,0.001301782,0.0004121175,0.0007923677,0.0001148622,0.003846752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006139809,0.0000547881,0.00004759427,0.00004396615,0.1265187,0.0004665043,0.0001871282,0.0002053174,0.0001850433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005607105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007720986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007472193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003389781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987467,0.0001634268,0.0001710305,0.0002119538,0.0002884786,0.0004183935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991962,0.00008252726,0.00004965911,0.0004873512,0.00005260281,0.0001316127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004195693,0.00004483559,0.0002568558,0.000004216831,0.000003845997,0.00001868547,0.001848073,2.560074e-7,0.00001135654,0.9949409,0.000371926,0.00245714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002004201,0.00003279166,0.00006035307,0.00002442688,0.000003560918,6.581187e-7,0.0001862972,0.00002847433,0.0002341681,0.7583383,0.2407691,0.0001214868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004026629,0.00003509527,0.0006982036,0.01008827,0.0003751305,0.0001924001,0.000002402396,0.00006373705,0.9845181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992478,0.00004442309,0.0001352676,0.0007903574,0.0004156992,0.00001315083,9.036913e-7,0.000009794297,0.006112367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}