{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":49,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":49,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"44e27f922d6f","filters":{"venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W1997782852","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1093","title":"Settlement, Return, and the Supersession Thesis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Settlement (finance); Indigenous; Human settlement; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Economics; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Waldron","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01548796120428758,"gpt":0.3141964076059255,"spread":0.2987084464016379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006689654,0.0003810705,0.0005565282,0.0009293106,0.005650057,0.006436269,0.001546948,0.003216362,0.007564508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01029198,0.0002546621,0.0007435682,0.0008852627,0.03903384,0.008251848,0.007210942,0.006679683,0.0009101133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003217134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002549918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004298102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003250425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937836,0.003191264,0.0002812388,0.0008997371,0.001001356,0.0008427509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958364,0.002070336,0.0004904894,0.0006380774,0.0006696931,0.0002950557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010725,0.00001036797,0.0003760988,0.00002207691,0.000003783342,0.000139274,0.008168936,0.00006072232,0.00003965379,0.9856846,0.001899655,0.00358411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007487019,0.00008831495,0.002580618,0.0003173865,0.00001706941,0.0006546197,0.01977036,0.000561865,0.0003676161,0.8122613,0.1632689,0.00003707542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1277806,0.006944129,0.02296466,0.06819528,0.001811487,0.0001313944,0.00007015308,0.00005888577,0.7720433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547355,0.001429555,0.001627262,0.005044441,0.0007517091,0.00009948945,0.00004751677,0.00004563028,0.03621887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007564508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03537869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121641526","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1198","title":"Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dignity; Religious law; Family law; Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Arbitration; Allegiance; Sociology; Israeli law; Identity (music); Religious identity; Political science; Private sphere; Public sphere; Private law; Islam; Public law; Religiosity; Black letter law","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03512001175155976,"gpt":0.2922466806274343,"spread":0.2571266688758745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01794796,0.0005870764,0.0008442079,0.001578486,0.01246095,0.01083031,0.004102019,0.01707688,0.002025984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02732833,0.0004804632,0.001088102,0.001148184,0.05958904,0.02401007,0.007276498,0.02026085,0.0006886189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006097426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005001936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02055742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02077545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857465,0.01034318,0.0003669127,0.001153964,0.001597603,0.0007919988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825951,0.01404171,0.0004809991,0.0009723006,0.001380445,0.0005294477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001797061,0.00001598804,0.0003104331,0.00006624046,0.00001049764,0.0004238535,0.02592147,0.0002030809,0.00007669474,0.9239921,0.0407808,0.008180965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003847679,0.00003002586,0.0003929764,0.0005115194,0.000008963429,0.0004634705,0.01267079,0.0005853586,0.0001753118,0.70683,0.2782354,0.00005776293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005290342,0.01886417,0.006254135,0.9383276,0.00262529,0.0000247461,0.00002390236,0.0000302546,0.02855963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4732309,0.02593398,0.01300092,0.4421239,0.01830863,0.0002377797,0.00003073937,0.0002169939,0.02691624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02055742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09491903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125806982","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1000","title":"Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Injustice; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Tort; Political science; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Ernest J. Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02935955596404381,"gpt":0.3850370660161229,"spread":0.3556775100520791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007490603,0.00117197,0.001003506,0.002148716,0.00413768,0.008768057,0.002972284,0.009140892,0.00639788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009743711,0.0005806402,0.001212372,0.001198906,0.0393025,0.01226907,0.007085558,0.009214379,0.0009778744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00605617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002494741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003239549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988059,0.0030962,0.0005053453,0.001751896,0.005434487,0.001153058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943818,0.002197701,0.0006197748,0.00159257,0.0009127,0.0002954677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000160457,0.000004021697,0.00001744004,0.000007803158,0.000001586583,0.00001642054,0.00009144362,0.0002229536,0.0000372439,0.9977582,0.0003661654,0.001475092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005320186,0.00001285054,0.00008442865,0.00004894727,0.00000641075,0.0000753296,0.00007119484,0.0005024603,0.0001427149,0.9785979,0.02043846,0.00001389775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01051173,0.01035997,0.2631404,0.02418519,0.001454087,0.0002100446,0.00009146264,0.0002673426,0.6897798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8460099,0.005176599,0.04997512,0.008546245,0.001972834,0.0004387551,0.00006361181,0.0002156668,0.08760115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009140892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04394084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154197270","doi":"10.1515/til-2013-009","title":"Differentiation in the Emerging Climate Regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Climate change; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Developing country; Kyoto Protocol; Convention; Conference of the parties; International community; Montreal Protocol; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Economic growth; Politics; Ecology; Law; Ozone layer","authors":[{"name":"Lavanya Rajamani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05232735177005776,"gpt":0.2660323475270985,"spread":0.2137049957570407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004240671,0.0001905336,0.0003277299,0.0007310493,0.002302544,0.003529653,0.0006461152,0.001688504,0.003054713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007229282,0.0001238094,0.0004534288,0.0008978846,0.01081897,0.004631215,0.004003302,0.003844857,0.0003506983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004092679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003020847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002507519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964993,0.001626295,0.0001768052,0.0005072599,0.0006718438,0.0005185069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997449,0.0008917502,0.0004773675,0.0003704233,0.0004789549,0.0003324331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003822128,0.000003429461,0.0003514957,0.000007702628,0.000001223503,0.0000237658,0.000352889,0.0002942376,0.00003782677,0.9967055,0.0002180589,0.00200011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008175709,0.00001469738,0.001398563,0.00006679819,0.000002897826,0.00006006969,0.0006484283,0.001027946,0.0001056616,0.9737722,0.02288451,0.00001008566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2035779,0.006990122,0.06786755,0.03133667,0.0004539229,0.0001196539,0.0002092941,0.00007522869,0.6893696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857077,0.00154568,0.004693741,0.001628517,0.0001338001,0.00005361238,0.00005363115,0.00001525895,0.006168097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004240671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02969462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969029342","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1158","title":"Citizenship with a Vengeance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Amnesty; Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Immigration; Argument (complex analysis); Globalization; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Dauvergne","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01612652756040001,"gpt":0.3229364869030785,"spread":0.3068099593426785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002791462,0.0002614831,0.0003383816,0.0008813479,0.007717102,0.007266743,0.0006886701,0.002970173,0.00881103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004581808,0.00015286,0.0003125533,0.0006779113,0.02883153,0.008089998,0.008231347,0.003825767,0.001011688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002286706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003799057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004575888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005922419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965556,0.001736949,0.0001122136,0.0004973391,0.0005075015,0.0005903852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979414,0.0005856378,0.0002316478,0.0003999882,0.000303886,0.0005375125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000390887,0.000009077879,0.000488712,0.000009013575,0.000001876092,0.00007244756,0.007937388,0.00003588563,0.0000535756,0.9846736,0.002433679,0.004280844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001145711,0.00005388652,0.001576821,0.0001910092,0.000008664102,0.0004045225,0.02092897,0.000265136,0.0001998843,0.5376641,0.4386678,0.00002774658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07176238,0.002433904,0.01138546,0.04305669,0.0006846984,0.00004562691,0.00004734748,0.00009823985,0.8704857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364048,0.0006383238,0.001451761,0.003511435,0.0002152502,0.00003682755,0.00003017116,0.0000366551,0.05767476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00881103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02947581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737459881","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0013","title":"Property and Sovereignty: How to Tell the Difference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Confusion; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Politics; Stewardship (theology); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Ripstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04499553625122221,"gpt":0.3274981946011386,"spread":0.2825026583499164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01593382,0.0006388266,0.001561684,0.003292718,0.004865879,0.01179673,0.002822323,0.008561665,0.01534693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06142423,0.0006696663,0.0007624922,0.002240902,0.06045348,0.04390896,0.00877394,0.01405853,0.002133391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005518455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003122675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005639264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002922148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868067,0.00872709,0.000677747,0.001371499,0.001851378,0.0005656781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566031,0.03315588,0.00166897,0.003969796,0.003395944,0.001206354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001287987,0.000007358055,0.0001457846,0.00004422144,0.000008769546,0.00006555624,0.001734076,0.0001942905,0.00002495406,0.9880977,0.00475687,0.004907515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004893408,0.000003426323,0.0000510081,0.00007267779,0.000004001425,0.00004053544,0.0005312013,0.0003000326,0.0000445619,0.9831245,0.0158163,0.000006933201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02670625,0.02607684,0.1660133,0.4362513,0.005787133,0.00009874352,0.0004068269,0.0003136741,0.338346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202047,0.007981989,0.02584996,0.02685884,0.002585935,0.0001593441,0.0002425718,0.0002545156,0.01586213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01593382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08426708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069029812","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1163","title":"(In)Security and Citizenship: Security, Im/migration and Shrinking Citizenship Regimes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Resizing; Political science; Business; Law; Politics; Economic policy","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra Dobrowolsky","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01578769699608734,"gpt":0.3150778134869479,"spread":0.2992901164908606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001168089,0.0001397173,0.0001707912,0.000742787,0.005721972,0.005784156,0.0004546946,0.001004322,0.003188081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001492032,0.00006422093,0.0001417406,0.001078688,0.0262765,0.002570745,0.003777659,0.001427715,0.0001418991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006288892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00551678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1106655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1392778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990345,0.0004014013,0.00002958941,0.00006855251,0.0001353318,0.0003306876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993684,0.0002090191,0.0001321553,0.00005222428,0.00007905041,0.0001591707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002097335,0.00002568895,0.01399086,0.00006580329,0.000004440508,0.0004420125,0.1906742,0.000147309,0.0002180578,0.7636229,0.004846425,0.02594134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001280484,0.0000621639,0.0696097,0.0005433229,0.00001962874,0.0008088885,0.5114074,0.0006071355,0.0004114497,0.1589486,0.2575386,0.00003023937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5616425,0.007537966,0.002645517,0.06032771,0.0002776906,0.00002532462,0.00004321833,0.00002521629,0.3674749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928842,0.001012265,0.0001747243,0.0006861574,0.00003654665,0.00000615161,0.000007515957,0.000003908225,0.005188603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1106655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2200426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126088849","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1019","title":"Correlativity, Personality, and the Emerging Consensus on Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Psychology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Ernest J. Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02813690632838961,"gpt":0.3426470481351979,"spread":0.3145101418068083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02867957,0.0005928579,0.001290812,0.004201236,0.006550346,0.01180476,0.003322434,0.009401619,0.002414929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02528859,0.0003207832,0.0007142621,0.0024592,0.05633426,0.01761982,0.007687185,0.01525323,0.0004562065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008386602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007180878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002249493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001843387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9776092,0.01037845,0.001153681,0.003607872,0.006054589,0.00119631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631551,0.02635885,0.002163842,0.00248559,0.004232213,0.001604419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001275076,0.00001143553,0.0002695967,0.00008685919,0.000007042237,0.00005967775,0.006327891,0.000190616,0.00005063351,0.9728252,0.002665556,0.01749253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006686054,0.00001713791,0.0004740675,0.000436405,0.000004884364,0.00008586411,0.006440672,0.0003404017,0.000113174,0.9515194,0.04053569,0.00002576528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06056989,0.1129161,0.04340678,0.6288601,0.004935408,0.00002922831,0.00007026594,0.0001163239,0.1490959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884602,0.04495912,0.01115029,0.04446101,0.004232966,0.00007550573,0.00006900427,0.0001144334,0.006477411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02867957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1516739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911278515","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0003","title":"Re-reading Westin","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Anonymity; Information privacy; Reading (process); Privacy policy; Focus (optics); Privacy by Design; Control (management); Negotiation; Right to privacy; Curiosity; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02647148579545598,"gpt":0.3303166060744447,"spread":0.3038451202789887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005629494,0.0008750111,0.0007213709,0.002050052,0.006707316,0.01086534,0.001584023,0.005968869,0.006097245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01804543,0.0004525131,0.0004692925,0.001391145,0.03207484,0.02135213,0.004307743,0.01602561,0.002095723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007271405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005104974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00977886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007404345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991964,0.004124799,0.0002570023,0.001303752,0.001850855,0.0004995764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875485,0.008823955,0.0003503337,0.00078301,0.002127873,0.0003663449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001451267,0.00001522933,0.0000829886,0.0000473636,0.000002646818,0.00009389153,0.008792503,0.0001102407,0.00007993809,0.8517843,0.1302861,0.008690208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006823724,0.00001326603,0.0001071233,0.0004299045,0.000005120509,0.0001152293,0.00455049,0.0003027039,0.0002974013,0.2835935,0.710555,0.00002340436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005715537,0.01981162,0.01437216,0.7469752,0.02323035,0.00004943536,0.0001486065,0.0001152202,0.1895818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4354404,0.03473023,0.01164808,0.2823035,0.01873405,0.0003343749,0.0002015609,0.000655239,0.2159526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01086534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05275804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042208543","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1127","title":"Facts on the Ground and Reconciliation of Divergent Consumer Insolvency Philosophies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Debt; Debtor; Opposition (politics); Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Jacob S. Ziegel","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03783276758323504,"gpt":0.3068127772802049,"spread":0.2689800096969698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009990174,0.0003825449,0.0005221181,0.002472323,0.0049271,0.01028939,0.001489997,0.004803658,0.006503817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01222254,0.0003456149,0.0004213226,0.002837316,0.03966034,0.0148542,0.00495874,0.01135413,0.0006845398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003798169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001768077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002474168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002748803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995139,0.002067815,0.0002377962,0.0009033617,0.001057471,0.000594519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907069,0.005920549,0.0006174916,0.001404318,0.001060807,0.0002899791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003028695,0.000009651015,0.0002749894,0.00002127915,0.000004763141,0.0000942839,0.008961554,0.00004573031,0.00006639409,0.9784491,0.005387577,0.006654424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003701218,0.00002823466,0.001732734,0.0003051808,0.00001451374,0.0002660084,0.01167221,0.0002608799,0.0003037318,0.7165228,0.2688184,0.00003821053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1190755,0.01820698,0.01576213,0.1935369,0.002731078,0.00007135482,0.0002947824,0.00009553905,0.6502256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9370469,0.006452801,0.005159209,0.02443932,0.002129313,0.0001314003,0.0002403076,0.0001480519,0.02425273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01028939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05283368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043700055","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1291","title":"Family Law Reform in Australia, or Frozen Chooks Revisited Again?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Family law; Legislature; Face (sociological concept); Law reform; Law; Political science; Best interests; Welfare; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Reg Graycar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07582124601240359,"gpt":0.3830031713158916,"spread":0.307181925303488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004173366,0.0001362952,0.00032663,0.001020635,0.008978209,0.005137451,0.0009729883,0.003933813,0.004099479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01110612,0.0002191987,0.0002521456,0.00127624,0.01196534,0.006255604,0.004062794,0.004293835,0.0002120187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01652447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0316016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2369769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2908497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967077,0.001383461,0.00009254045,0.000271518,0.0005861999,0.0009584817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974711,0.000694636,0.0003608733,0.0002091958,0.0005811739,0.0006830349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002661344,0.000133793,0.007507543,0.0002972232,0.00002109149,0.0008725845,0.1125197,0.0003331091,0.0004870326,0.7613948,0.0222606,0.09414596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003581872,0.0002256097,0.09982155,0.001759571,0.00005269984,0.000679139,0.1525079,0.001031633,0.0005534404,0.1752235,0.5680021,0.0001070977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3684192,0.0265385,0.001251008,0.4450945,0.001401359,0.00006881342,0.00005135557,0.00003389479,0.1571413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387888,0.00610905,0.0006671228,0.02852141,0.0001990631,0.0000404917,0.00001394283,0.00001170926,0.02564842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2369769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4711951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623388010","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-104","title":"Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Humanity; Political philosophy; Law and economics; International law; Political science; Popular sovereignty; Power (physics); Democracy; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04991531528797417,"gpt":0.3507328770423187,"spread":0.3008175617543445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005946087,0.0003936852,0.0005806695,0.002444403,0.004840802,0.009186717,0.001259144,0.00542033,0.003747654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009263583,0.0003274266,0.0005326216,0.002071204,0.03451825,0.01380836,0.004127656,0.006867273,0.0004578106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01042883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003465751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006196792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004980993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960859,0.002514551,0.0001078923,0.0004269387,0.0006023325,0.0002622675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946942,0.003927173,0.0003194144,0.0003958458,0.000405477,0.0002577836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002820534,0.000002083942,0.00001539221,0.00000560622,9.289591e-7,0.0000133183,0.0008225022,0.00007388573,0.000009788096,0.9975998,0.000978854,0.0004749986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005821368,0.000002512767,0.00003477651,0.0000431866,0.000002064816,0.00001469969,0.0004901137,0.0002530937,0.00002212461,0.9866543,0.01247313,0.000004247658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.05676159,0.0472562,0.03826322,0.4099948,0.00157693,0.0000470035,0.0001095006,0.00008513086,0.4459057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600258,0.007720186,0.004782479,0.01159723,0.000975227,0.00008253585,0.00003573082,0.00005537999,0.01472537],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01042883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07566684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040638741","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1153","title":"Who Is the Citizen's Other? Considering the Heft of Citizenship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Statelessness; Refugee; Stateless protocol; Political science; Social citizenship; Politics; Sociology; Law; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Macklin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02731455271352973,"gpt":0.333184469801513,"spread":0.3058699170879832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00590413,0.0004072461,0.000495698,0.00137496,0.02004763,0.01533758,0.001327575,0.004698519,0.004491164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006064488,0.0002256677,0.0004761615,0.001430552,0.07990873,0.02499201,0.01186521,0.007956106,0.0004973221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006112225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004649208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01404317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01395111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922941,0.005301627,0.0001217541,0.0007387412,0.0005634964,0.0009803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971155,0.001555587,0.0002274449,0.0003256498,0.0002907517,0.0004850921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005563904,0.000004926963,0.0004038738,0.00001430933,0.000002250092,0.0001930019,0.0684251,0.00003497259,0.00004174572,0.92653,0.001878335,0.002465924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009805241,0.00002373863,0.000762948,0.0002937523,0.00001082554,0.0003288809,0.2195348,0.0003052834,0.0002404347,0.5957662,0.1826964,0.0000268988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1885784,0.009761903,0.01980627,0.1963018,0.001659761,0.00005041591,0.00005618784,0.00006811078,0.5837171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831324,0.001334616,0.0007014831,0.004427941,0.0002904511,0.00002481659,0.00001721246,0.00004072715,0.01003046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02004763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04434758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912552388","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0011","title":"Theorizing Privacy in a Liberal Democracy: Canadian Jurisprudence, Anti-Terrorism, and Social Memory After 9/11","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Liberal democracy; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Sociology; Terrorism; Right to privacy; Transparency (behavior); Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Valerie Steeves","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01059407913373436,"gpt":0.293567769427548,"spread":0.2829736902938136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01033289,0.00051659,0.0004998561,0.003064754,0.04297865,0.01945491,0.003089865,0.007867445,0.004158591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01680952,0.0004589054,0.0005512896,0.003561573,0.1284613,0.01187328,0.01040829,0.01035844,0.0002350211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1106796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07006314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.853229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7811172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991147,0.003736096,0.0001757844,0.0007362962,0.002149118,0.002055715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854437,0.00923022,0.0007103964,0.0008222926,0.0027445,0.001048893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009468361,0.000009746642,0.0003273143,0.00001664534,0.000002772235,0.000197388,0.1759092,0.000191763,0.00005328273,0.8188706,0.002162925,0.002248943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003147417,0.00002335993,0.001732251,0.0004420492,0.00002682076,0.0001814611,0.2853067,0.001141469,0.0003710162,0.5185099,0.1921407,0.00009279951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.226448,0.006279537,0.008877032,0.1909551,0.0005281228,0.0001065433,0.0001442913,0.00005164059,0.5666096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916868,0.0007289647,0.0004936639,0.002385795,0.00003578085,0.00002001859,0.00001500672,0.00001499716,0.004618924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.146771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8030401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509696337","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0022","title":"Technological neutrality: recalibrating copyright in the information age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Normative; Law and economics; Technological change; Net neutrality; Jurisprudence; Copyright law; Intellectual property; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; The Internet","authors":[{"name":"Donna Craig","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02550113929871186,"gpt":0.2383122564895001,"spread":0.2128111171907882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03303251,0.0004139012,0.0005057853,0.004406386,0.004280949,0.01876967,0.00241475,0.005336248,0.00291513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06006301,0.0003556487,0.0006623726,0.001725223,0.07225035,0.02808701,0.01084904,0.00606642,0.0006516479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004739582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005178413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001275857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008512788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9749781,0.01401971,0.001255979,0.002124282,0.006517201,0.001104852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472781,0.02961111,0.004873766,0.0103935,0.006572061,0.001271396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004128755,0.00000647488,0.000146472,0.00001576424,0.000002334592,0.00005079752,0.004311482,0.0001950362,0.0001922756,0.991583,0.0001500224,0.003342162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000722388,0.00002596021,0.0002960171,0.0001343222,0.000009196225,0.0001543711,0.003045517,0.001109979,0.0008663422,0.9664157,0.02790813,0.00002730141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1940519,0.003637459,0.2678456,0.04799449,0.0008920027,0.0001509492,0.00006969329,0.0002429464,0.4851148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822547,0.0007448358,0.01075545,0.001333487,0.0002503428,0.00006919293,0.00001819282,0.00005257338,0.004521276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03303251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1746947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057609726","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1154","title":"The Worth of Citizenship in an Unequal World","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Entitlement (fair division); Politics; Legitimacy; Scrutiny; Sociology; Economic Justice; Obligation; Population; Function (biology); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ayelet Shachar","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03522674584828078,"gpt":0.40109550790755,"spread":0.3658687620592692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006935527,0.0003411407,0.0006040449,0.001559742,0.009391166,0.01160333,0.001132765,0.003700134,0.004405614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009551691,0.0002916068,0.0004030433,0.001162216,0.08683682,0.02120409,0.01176805,0.004981546,0.0003905369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003639144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001882882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002103571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002384756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993238,0.003956592,0.0001790833,0.0008412438,0.0008840091,0.0009011588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938952,0.002887549,0.0007227979,0.001249267,0.0004056865,0.0008394624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009146779,0.000007789141,0.0005222149,0.000008340016,0.000005773491,0.00005504159,0.006060607,0.00007852183,0.00004627441,0.9899451,0.0004492047,0.002812006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009576168,0.00001717919,0.00112632,0.00005763295,0.000007710431,0.0001122575,0.008825343,0.0001890685,0.00008943058,0.9694713,0.02008341,0.00001076465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2481798,0.005395689,0.03090855,0.07348228,0.000663925,0.00006854751,0.00008030442,0.00004631124,0.6411746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923311,0.0006105081,0.001197809,0.001517923,0.0002309717,0.0000370532,0.00001797238,0.00001805536,0.004038418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01160333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03667897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141357239","doi":"10.1515/til-2013-004","title":"The Montreal Protocol Protection of Ozone and Climate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Ozone layer; Greenhouse gas; Kyoto Protocol; Environmental science; Climate change; Environmental protection; Ozone; Treaty; Protocol (science); Natural resource economics; Meteorology; Political science; Geography; Ecology; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"D. W. Fahey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009596809917588154,"gpt":0.2302407303279762,"spread":0.2206439204103881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006506412,0.001197149,0.0007602068,0.002246869,0.006852907,0.006695969,0.003781073,0.00953547,0.04439064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01406533,0.0007789588,0.001450721,0.001906147,0.003576236,0.002744324,0.003738085,0.01047383,0.01392784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01182004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04256139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3893658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3136094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99151,0.00142268,0.000423345,0.001057369,0.00405318,0.001533322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949449,0.0006968472,0.000284266,0.0009291269,0.002816667,0.0003281519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006006467,0.00005680326,0.0005279794,0.0001649741,0.00002052747,0.0002166408,0.0004617062,0.0003572701,0.001496847,0.6796011,0.299502,0.01753408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002587176,0.00002980015,0.001134748,0.0001968433,0.0000176274,0.00005916195,0.00007542059,0.0001635996,0.0005434142,0.01681606,0.9808842,0.00005336912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002432696,0.003201488,0.00566975,0.02090549,0.002225517,0.0009509613,0.004855318,0.0003663011,0.9593924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08032144,0.00825868,0.02161438,0.04713916,0.00179432,0.003262279,0.005887582,0.0004733032,0.8312488],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3893658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7741988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290766374","doi":"10.1515/til-2022-0015","title":"Bilateral labor agreements as migration governance tools: An analysis from a gender lens","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Gender equality; Work (physics); Human rights; Political science; Inequality; Gender inequality; Gender diversity; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Law; Engineering; Management","authors":[{"name":"Jenna Hennebry","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicola Piper","is_ca":true},{"name":"Hari KC","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kira Williams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04108246071455485,"gpt":0.3428963459407654,"spread":0.3018138852262106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009164702,0.0002550283,0.000304494,0.003549884,0.00306476,0.006438813,0.0009261743,0.001027296,0.0146148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587077,0.0001928544,0.0003610668,0.006010483,0.006273906,0.00629688,0.004966643,0.001481301,0.0004976193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004937385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003793761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006348245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007930191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907946,0.00606017,0.0002305253,0.0004755908,0.001310108,0.001129006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894606,0.00665355,0.001756556,0.0006882275,0.001016379,0.0004246505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002636784,0.00002315099,0.01308578,0.0001075281,0.000009747519,0.0001344184,0.03098688,0.0006486217,0.0002004322,0.9336365,0.001342144,0.01979841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003279538,0.00009839707,0.0506044,0.001557905,0.00005474784,0.0003426331,0.229006,0.005570891,0.0007396995,0.4027244,0.3092268,0.00004140596],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.491634,0.003629965,0.04056535,0.01170109,0.0001240428,0.0002494346,0.0009829726,0.00009072817,0.4510224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887671,0.0006629502,0.003302845,0.0002955941,0.00002645829,0.0001277646,0.0001209553,0.00002572567,0.006670779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04889137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965277367","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1258","title":"Comparative Taxation and Legal Theory: The Tax Design Case of the Transplant of General Anti-Avoidance Rules","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax reform; Tax law; Tax avoidance; Public economics; Indirect tax; Double taxation; Law and economics; Economics; Direct tax","authors":[{"name":"Carlo Garbarino","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02000444795618363,"gpt":0.2674586854296543,"spread":0.2474542374734707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005896922,0.0002494922,0.0005248081,0.001783415,0.008432915,0.007099231,0.001348983,0.002673916,0.004162046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008800454,0.0002818236,0.000579946,0.002442793,0.0350046,0.006933442,0.00365049,0.002682573,0.0001714777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02050348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008742821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04709183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04654579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952383,0.002814645,0.000114014,0.0004162307,0.000767979,0.0006488778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965997,0.001788341,0.0003746711,0.0006320296,0.0003723706,0.0002329229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005368495,0.000004787761,0.0002100083,0.000007689707,0.00000136237,0.00004558236,0.00168741,0.0003352049,0.00003351219,0.9955916,0.0001156681,0.001961836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005067671,0.00005819652,0.002079231,0.0001234127,0.00002283963,0.0002475436,0.005457256,0.004526114,0.0005457724,0.9244381,0.06242897,0.00002191452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3109823,0.002280529,0.05932542,0.01564779,0.000133557,0.0001912383,0.00006778438,0.00006230052,0.6113091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879344,0.0002620699,0.005050033,0.0004087803,0.00001587278,0.00004801206,0.00001281255,0.00001095714,0.006257029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04709183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1487638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008109300","doi":"10.1515/til-2020-0002","title":"25 Years of Elder Law: An Integrative and Historical Account of the Field of Law and Aging","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Elder Abuse and Neglect","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Constructive; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Sociology; Political science; History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Israel Doron","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0244286914933049,"gpt":0.3279550088564711,"spread":0.3035263173631662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00462719,0.0003701289,0.000292164,0.003815951,0.006841431,0.006880105,0.0007870353,0.002592925,0.002219702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004413083,0.0001774738,0.0001765855,0.002740131,0.02264414,0.006534051,0.004327196,0.003431877,0.0001545631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004356564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01132722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01841199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975228,0.001630419,0.0001047696,0.0001699898,0.0003076057,0.0002644293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964458,0.002219058,0.0004707834,0.00008352081,0.0003233414,0.0004575465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008032954,0.00004886688,0.001822293,0.0001077748,0.00000368474,0.0005692123,0.2222076,0.0001157749,0.00008919957,0.7530136,0.006937277,0.01507673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039718,0.00007283112,0.00658972,0.001787797,0.000007938998,0.0007696701,0.1641974,0.0002368169,0.0001531524,0.06630417,0.7598387,0.00003784437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2158161,0.3743356,0.004180003,0.09502806,0.003161229,0.00009745928,0.0001492397,0.00003784415,0.3071945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8977678,0.08257069,0.0007372388,0.004135483,0.001320272,0.0000579134,0.00002919198,0.00001148113,0.01337001],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01132722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05398923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125020779","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0011","title":"Informal Workers’ Aggregation and Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Workforce; Informal sector; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Informal education; Business; Sociology; Economic growth; Political science; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Routh Supriya","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03575435948051943,"gpt":0.3792886883178452,"spread":0.3435343288373258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006656541,0.0002855422,0.0003873275,0.002089411,0.0136309,0.009562122,0.001636608,0.003269671,0.005726895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01279697,0.0004132098,0.0004448707,0.001805758,0.02876307,0.003754579,0.01166363,0.004375909,0.0006181531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008385225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008676498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03025448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0259667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991008,0.002058464,0.0004897316,0.00144728,0.002694408,0.002302252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902052,0.003866902,0.001750253,0.00177865,0.001233014,0.001166004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001658733,0.00004055067,0.0107312,0.00007035439,0.00001241362,0.0005005279,0.04528723,0.0003355433,0.0002812158,0.9060587,0.007728585,0.02893716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000434286,0.00009194774,0.0372284,0.000724848,0.00004147695,0.0006052068,0.04015572,0.001448683,0.0005659182,0.4441651,0.4748269,0.0001023467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3353485,0.005281425,0.01584589,0.04323037,0.0006191142,0.0002518687,0.0001513833,0.0002313284,0.5990401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771495,0.0005632681,0.001037211,0.002131923,0.0001981506,0.00007514375,0.00002680698,0.00002278014,0.01879525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03025448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06083935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971249996","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1150","title":"The Critical Modernism of Hannah Arendt","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Trilogy; Modernism (music); Successor cardinal; Politics; Metaphysics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Literature; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Mark Antaki","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02380308296743102,"gpt":0.3541619359858111,"spread":0.3303588530183801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005041337,0.0003705277,0.0003241264,0.00111301,0.006176349,0.005203929,0.0007370004,0.00367438,0.003460002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00974685,0.0002291062,0.0002415983,0.0008414224,0.02892865,0.007541304,0.002588011,0.007150693,0.0004366094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007393644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004090758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006000748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005841378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954117,0.002612212,0.00008561953,0.0004841658,0.001037257,0.000369044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957814,0.002972196,0.0002026865,0.0002382158,0.0004974621,0.0003080819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006349544,0.00001021661,0.00004911438,0.00002157842,0.000001638869,0.00002729308,0.003034435,0.0000495103,0.00003399751,0.9710109,0.022737,0.003017861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001255841,0.00001116234,0.0001840937,0.0001777778,0.000003218855,0.00006994382,0.002574331,0.0003101802,0.000163751,0.7175775,0.278901,0.00001457944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01519255,0.03669147,0.009071412,0.6088607,0.005955503,0.00003709049,0.00004086278,0.00005124847,0.3240993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8383188,0.01282255,0.004687133,0.07596113,0.005560076,0.0001376385,0.00003366279,0.00006402547,0.06241495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007393644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0536449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063592555","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1023","title":"Criminal Theory in the Twentieth Century","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Culpability; Public law; Comparative law; Political science; Common law; Normative; Punishment (psychology); Presumption; Sociology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"George P. Fletcher","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02771342401952274,"gpt":0.3424754771634526,"spread":0.3147620531439298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009942485,0.0003863592,0.0003176326,0.003046185,0.00718417,0.005331452,0.0009412685,0.003392344,0.004672499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002357873,0.0002020371,0.0002331094,0.002208509,0.02600649,0.004306443,0.002363126,0.002890188,0.0005981506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01825838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00605419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0472076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0505931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985781,0.000506533,0.00006016257,0.0002383259,0.0003647045,0.0002522739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988765,0.0005394774,0.0001511203,0.00006282231,0.0002171306,0.0001530447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003627645,0.00001456289,0.0002250511,0.0000329898,0.000001495384,0.0001259931,0.00389776,0.00015295,0.00002071976,0.9831164,0.005493469,0.00691499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001155895,0.00002196532,0.001532814,0.0004944806,0.000003073616,0.0002843669,0.00301156,0.0003798908,0.00006416853,0.2867153,0.707462,0.00001886747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04905394,0.1514622,0.0049539,0.06399745,0.002604043,0.00005475185,0.0001110311,0.00004452143,0.7277181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6543889,0.09648804,0.004325918,0.01625124,0.00206108,0.000185174,0.0001378838,0.00006561736,0.2260962],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0472076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1324744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801021333","doi":"10.1515/til-2019-0005","title":"Schrödinger’s Robot: Privacy in Uncertain States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Doctrine; Intervention (counseling); Internet privacy; Optimism; Computer science; Privacy law; Nothing; Computer security; Psychology; Information privacy; Artificial intelligence; Law; Privacy policy; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ian Kerr","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03651674190837315,"gpt":0.3865891889344925,"spread":0.3500724470261194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003382716,0.0002994071,0.0004893612,0.0007406771,0.001593663,0.003156232,0.0008569109,0.003343995,0.006373797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0149191,0.0003202699,0.0007197445,0.0006423591,0.01200823,0.006485633,0.003046407,0.00400606,0.0007439722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002156691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001517993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003418976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001299008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968316,0.001754637,0.0001750979,0.0003518703,0.0006669749,0.0002198965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918573,0.005880621,0.0005754798,0.0008603756,0.0006574217,0.0001686948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005050537,0.000001947308,0.00005760432,0.00001649388,0.000002930007,0.00006081154,0.0002144461,0.001341393,0.00006240582,0.9961531,0.0007598283,0.001324077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005757177,0.00000504438,0.00004999674,0.000018494,0.000002395437,0.00004495003,0.00005481832,0.00433925,0.00008242086,0.991644,0.003744975,0.000007910149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06225257,0.004793681,0.4100119,0.1068338,0.0009982028,0.0001059933,0.000446992,0.000238585,0.4143183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648955,0.00167646,0.0192649,0.002320551,0.0004183759,0.0001003769,0.00008670383,0.00003592446,0.01120119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006373797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02132249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1644300354","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-110","title":"Sovereignty as Trusteeship and Indigenous Peoples","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Colonialism; Political science; Law; Paternalism; International law; Duty; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Evan Fox-Decent","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ian Dahlman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02848270113767715,"gpt":0.3320846004974409,"spread":0.3036018993597637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004007521,0.0001250338,0.0002674071,0.0008412324,0.005187114,0.005502796,0.0006489172,0.002718007,0.003620956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005797978,0.0001702903,0.0002733795,0.0007353682,0.03236466,0.006327428,0.006276472,0.00383396,0.000134706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004528395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002874728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01841197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01451949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959258,0.002144374,0.0001634579,0.0003827404,0.0006010492,0.000782552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957352,0.002453135,0.0005773139,0.0002995291,0.0004842139,0.0004505856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001668202,0.00000533558,0.0004814243,0.000008255543,0.000001800313,0.00007973396,0.0105619,0.00006715541,0.00004000872,0.9873101,0.000296231,0.001146525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001668295,0.00004414679,0.003904714,0.000233293,0.00001697365,0.0003728363,0.02159107,0.001129265,0.0001953471,0.8801436,0.09231128,0.00004082591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3387589,0.007757026,0.009148879,0.04540467,0.0003096481,0.00003477401,0.00002797071,0.00002070736,0.5985374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950053,0.0004513144,0.000247884,0.0005620699,0.00005335675,0.000007182705,0.000002824944,0.000002446232,0.003667495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01841197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03660959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095581877","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1007","title":"Communities of Judgment and Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Epistemology; Human rights; Set (abstract data type); Relation (database); Common sense; Sociology; Law; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Nedelsky","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04300944005400052,"gpt":0.3584844386553654,"spread":0.3154749986013649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116826,0.0004190049,0.0005322635,0.002145949,0.0101914,0.01109407,0.001197446,0.005206917,0.005183687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01996932,0.0002423199,0.0004803451,0.001580886,0.05796288,0.01097979,0.008675679,0.004491786,0.0005727172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008124701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00761311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00720657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005065643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9819127,0.01147287,0.0004237744,0.0017255,0.002862924,0.001602263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898248,0.00597968,0.0009282652,0.001079457,0.001313507,0.0008742772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000244609,0.000003960668,0.00007690681,0.000009370016,0.000001418937,0.0000152282,0.001942435,0.0001060415,0.00001714251,0.9944504,0.0009397186,0.002435044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005322768,0.000005933578,0.0001641461,0.00003655347,0.000001514449,0.00002109818,0.001487487,0.0002876415,0.00003344968,0.9740893,0.02386231,0.000005137342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04486464,0.009562932,0.02850402,0.06592083,0.0006571466,0.00008736744,0.00003616515,0.00007917349,0.8502878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972648,0.001690596,0.004420798,0.002608263,0.000318908,0.00008261669,0.00002047262,0.00002952539,0.01818078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06178421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785381600","doi":"10.1515/til-2018-0009","title":"Class Action Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Proposition; Compensation (psychology); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Mechanism (biology); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Piché","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05043036617497085,"gpt":0.4048915222369855,"spread":0.3544611560620147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006890486,0.0003457741,0.000466669,0.002652091,0.003879638,0.006869215,0.001431658,0.001857972,0.03199084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0216956,0.0001219951,0.0003321834,0.001893839,0.006610916,0.003036996,0.002570084,0.001536718,0.001532693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01272982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00891571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07254713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08634018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887909,0.002779924,0.0003041008,0.001068284,0.004950443,0.002106339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841817,0.004333121,0.001514942,0.002119,0.005826591,0.002024569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000287268,0.00005226096,0.01734669,0.0000511762,0.00003100127,0.0001074967,0.002133149,0.0005106524,0.0001917425,0.9330984,0.01041016,0.03603853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005028563,0.000124678,0.08927687,0.0005707681,0.0001368294,0.0004242448,0.009963977,0.003199003,0.0008707902,0.4574671,0.4378301,0.00008536459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0580199,0.0005041609,0.006957121,0.008118672,0.0001681751,0.0001276585,0.0004773813,0.00004739905,0.9255794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661725,0.0001779367,0.0009004269,0.0007579875,0.00008967338,0.00005191867,0.0001486687,0.00001219052,0.03168857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07254713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1442497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089303589","doi":"10.1515/til-2020-0015","title":"Territorial Justice in Israel/Palestine","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Palestine; Compromise; Politics; State (computer science); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; History; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Moore","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04675035597196315,"gpt":0.3338797192303954,"spread":0.2871293632584322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002335157,0.0001241701,0.000244034,0.0006429796,0.008697527,0.004391605,0.0005539714,0.001558085,0.003998396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001619218,0.00009661965,0.00009161509,0.0007083272,0.01788803,0.001356098,0.00381503,0.001442455,0.0002673602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004785688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003168642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0166921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02734042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986179,0.0006471934,0.00003551572,0.00009115299,0.0001618766,0.000446411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994578,0.0002065943,0.00009682844,0.00004115519,0.00009953693,0.00009816942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002968898,0.00005625914,0.006891717,0.00004941913,0.000009076987,0.001269355,0.07428581,0.0003368423,0.0005565567,0.8963768,0.002874391,0.01726405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005333373,0.00017194,0.03034934,0.0007560358,0.00002187195,0.001461,0.3773574,0.001299193,0.001522747,0.2396401,0.3473102,0.00005689791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6296027,0.002455896,0.001075843,0.008752633,0.00009426376,0.00002716479,0.00002041297,0.000010738,0.3579603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971699,0.0001114252,0.00005855566,0.0002710924,0.000009301804,0.000002926543,0.000002951531,0.000001076491,0.002372757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0166921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03472275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886905957","doi":"10.1515/til-2018-0028","title":"Indigenous Peoples, Political Economists and the Tragedy of the Commons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Indigenous; Commons; Politics; Population; Environmental ethics; Natural resource; Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Michel Morin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01912896356402754,"gpt":0.2792240625164411,"spread":0.2600950989524135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001532039,0.0001493226,0.0001425957,0.001450083,0.005459699,0.004017669,0.0004806748,0.001390563,0.004820801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001946606,0.0000956141,0.0001015694,0.001193124,0.01275986,0.00201285,0.001367056,0.002224983,0.0001892248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01295244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004962089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1591878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1754967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992759,0.0003425135,0.00001197569,0.00004686835,0.000167771,0.0001550453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979613,0.001217032,0.0001603083,0.00006591743,0.0003499872,0.0002453689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006926653,0.0000118073,0.0009133788,0.00002367755,0.000003421263,0.00008518049,0.004236994,0.0003297343,0.00003491092,0.9822521,0.009355808,0.002746053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001251376,0.00001359051,0.00445599,0.0002119645,0.000009300504,0.00009708609,0.01758116,0.001632582,0.0001527278,0.6483138,0.3274958,0.00002339837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.166557,0.02278022,0.003884694,0.2899976,0.001013012,0.00002428886,0.0001226854,0.00004535218,0.5155752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498832,0.005402707,0.0005049209,0.007443107,0.0005682343,0.00001376501,0.00001442858,0.00001454605,0.03615526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1591878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3165224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123715249","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1259","title":"Tax Levels, Structures, and Reforms: Convergence or Persistence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Globalization; Tax competition; Tax reform; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Tax revenue; Ad valorem tax; Convergence (economics); Direct tax; International economics; Market economy; Public economics; Macroeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Neil Brooks","is_ca":true},{"name":"Thaddeus Hwong","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03215570590205604,"gpt":0.2716658884045457,"spread":0.2395101825024896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006369833,0.0002040665,0.000940838,0.006586146,0.001264125,0.009158642,0.0009817437,0.001517071,0.006089565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02719494,0.0002655018,0.0005225734,0.008261231,0.008367668,0.01185736,0.005922636,0.00269421,0.0006784022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003301757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001772091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00248731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001983614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995425,0.001737066,0.0003114626,0.0008862806,0.0009472814,0.0006928238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819854,0.006827991,0.005978127,0.001556607,0.002449526,0.001202242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002759361,0.0002276496,0.3127572,0.0004135908,0.0003261215,0.0002581263,0.0122692,0.004158674,0.0003109874,0.4952332,0.004215517,0.1695538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009209624,0.0003722353,0.5189716,0.00125091,0.000203641,0.0006340644,0.02914131,0.008216244,0.0009017589,0.3823335,0.0577501,0.0001325607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7515252,0.02846665,0.01309121,0.03758007,0.0002167345,0.0001163976,0.0009232952,0.0001334586,0.1679469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924239,0.003138633,0.001052074,0.0006234138,0.0002412624,0.00003078029,0.0002461281,0.00002706504,0.002216864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009158642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03368729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003235112","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1280","title":"The Efficacy of Regulation as a Function of Psychological Fit: Reexamining the Hard Law/Soft Law Continuum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hard law; Soft law; Law; Compliance (psychology); Perspective (graphical); Function (biology); Incentive; Philosophy of law; Psychology; Social psychology; Comparative law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; International law","authors":[{"name":"Deborah E. Rupp","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cynthia A. Williams","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07379689688929711,"gpt":0.3491020111001863,"spread":0.2753051142108892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121192,0.000345191,0.0005972704,0.002616558,0.001541409,0.005171196,0.001100822,0.001923054,0.005273351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054738,0.0003372252,0.0006330035,0.001465594,0.009964675,0.005961609,0.006191532,0.004626674,0.0003312341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001446869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000818635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001305155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007306541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945064,0.003010293,0.0001859414,0.0006561538,0.001180655,0.0004605924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9218397,0.05711492,0.007189145,0.006873074,0.003793569,0.003189644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002009809,0.00297091,0.5930361,0.0002748074,0.0003474338,0.0004935304,0.05951375,0.002927063,0.00620455,0.2224249,0.0009185453,0.1088786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001334518,0.000735128,0.8730438,0.000106756,0.0001340818,0.0002794739,0.01861913,0.0120183,0.001496868,0.09069034,0.002663702,0.00007907823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589199,0.0002619213,0.004439482,0.002309201,0.00001588591,0.00007857016,0.00003976065,0.00002681856,0.03390855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988507,0.00003721278,0.000673138,0.0001126105,0.00001243525,0.00002612007,0.00001998292,0.00001302361,0.0002547679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06409323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984682637","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1255","title":"Tax Transplants and Local Culture: A Comparative Study of the Chinese and Canadian GAAR","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Divergence (linguistics); China; Legal culture; Political science; Ideology; Law; Tax avoidance; Law and economics; Economics; Tax reform; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Jinyan Li","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01109259974519115,"gpt":0.2626718889119273,"spread":0.2515792891667362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009054474,0.0002890413,0.0005044518,0.002852833,0.009742459,0.002463363,0.0009152265,0.0003685452,0.003647156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002797788,0.0002142492,0.0002632657,0.009709027,0.003820316,0.0008438267,0.001675279,0.0008730831,0.0001695987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02516781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0204803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9715428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990315,0.0001373262,0.00002447524,0.00008281881,0.0002484262,0.0004753556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977738,0.0003968599,0.0003994901,0.00008351289,0.000795419,0.0005508698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001939088,0.0001826219,0.5174828,0.0001412991,0.0000886189,0.001045295,0.4396569,0.0002299313,0.001003002,0.005318568,0.002081504,0.03257553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006182577,0.00006514046,0.5745535,0.00005569432,0.00003211407,0.0001292586,0.4189616,0.0001584096,0.0001113379,0.0001579361,0.005734655,0.000034083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964561,0.0001607314,0.00001643888,0.0001152113,0.000003873677,0.000005604372,0.00005021689,0.00000109492,0.003190717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985718,0.0002809117,0.00002992317,0.00005303839,0.000002457848,0.000004646285,0.00007619515,0.000002629268,0.0009784201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02845716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1826061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046776891","doi":"10.1515/1565-3404.1292","title":"Something Old, Something New? Re-theorizing Patriarchal Relations and Privatization from the Outskirts of Family Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Family law; Law; Gender studies; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Shelley A. M. Gavigan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05923891985154026,"gpt":0.3502944301557225,"spread":0.2910555103041823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006654054,0.000373314,0.0003609517,0.002427691,0.0154688,0.01161697,0.001784776,0.003209194,0.001806071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005428045,0.0003063333,0.000320287,0.001683634,0.1293381,0.01350904,0.004115629,0.00647031,0.0001682599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03935887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02272206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.272676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2079837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949351,0.003289022,0.00006542432,0.0003183045,0.0006001084,0.0007919316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996464,0.002383337,0.0002809006,0.0002472505,0.0003625122,0.0002620652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002988297,0.000009832472,0.0003966414,0.00002320902,0.00000164371,0.0001484117,0.1755398,0.00009437817,0.00005308464,0.8191919,0.0007605354,0.003777482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001047029,0.0000249168,0.002084288,0.0006385922,0.00001144198,0.000351824,0.2997251,0.0008388186,0.0003289929,0.5051895,0.1907702,0.00002584422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2557211,0.03072761,0.01732337,0.1952056,0.0005157312,0.00008916246,0.00004445728,0.00008141726,0.5002916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884975,0.002932527,0.000619298,0.00192389,0.00006411635,0.000019612,0.000005466364,0.00001995615,0.005917718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.272676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5421777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036475377","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-008","title":"Corporate Fiduciary Duties and Prudential Regulation of Financial Institutions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Corporation; Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Corporate law; Shareholder; Liability; Law; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Supreme court; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Edward Iacobucci","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09868123007834605,"gpt":0.3569908371897059,"spread":0.2583096071113598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01222169,0.0002745437,0.0003926497,0.001472831,0.003033862,0.006950855,0.001460627,0.005155633,0.002264521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02312338,0.0004442366,0.0006608485,0.000700828,0.02038759,0.003659008,0.003906016,0.004861017,0.0003128573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006055142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007828016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009867679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00909339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861362,0.00469237,0.0008383978,0.001715731,0.004494649,0.002122648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712622,0.01149628,0.006328657,0.004549033,0.004695989,0.001667952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007779773,0.00002815879,0.001118028,0.00001246345,0.00000660732,0.00004813967,0.0006413389,0.001076703,0.0002567066,0.991928,0.0007225222,0.004153603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002933936,0.00005779866,0.007062607,0.0002221055,0.00003028527,0.0001396032,0.0004645897,0.00514009,0.0009985224,0.9547101,0.03108932,0.00005559313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2340819,0.004177109,0.101677,0.03211601,0.0004710934,0.0001464447,0.00008823917,0.00012091,0.6271212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862959,0.000369195,0.003893822,0.002403756,0.0001666082,0.00005734639,0.00001356908,0.000009626652,0.006790251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01222169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06463528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517679917","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0023","title":"Intellectual property, antitrust, and the rule of law: between private power and state power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tying; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Private law; Public law; Law; Competition law; Rule of law; Competition (biology); State (computer science); Economics; Power (physics); Politics; Political science; Monopoly; Market economy; Computer science; Microeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Ariel Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0462665861976401,"gpt":0.2363629440686333,"spread":0.1900963578709932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007637529,0.0002758164,0.0006323548,0.001786679,0.004261157,0.01711352,0.0009691299,0.005569333,0.004002393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01149259,0.0003502484,0.0006000967,0.001774265,0.05637002,0.01562464,0.004008231,0.006942911,0.0004442931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006524357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00459103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004949247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00298785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937674,0.003476886,0.0002120398,0.0007228042,0.001297984,0.0005228818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841175,0.01260428,0.00100751,0.0009806008,0.0009214282,0.000368662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002149672,0.000003722066,0.00004927864,0.000004222257,8.738651e-7,0.00001478149,0.0002643763,0.0000996477,0.00001534732,0.9985158,0.0002016205,0.0008282313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004883871,0.00000743278,0.0001385788,0.00005955932,0.000002882921,0.00002345906,0.0004015227,0.0005453467,0.00006249715,0.9897776,0.008970516,0.000005693315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09997302,0.02334256,0.07533883,0.1435094,0.0008185697,0.00004758253,0.00009164394,0.00007205649,0.6568063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853057,0.002668605,0.003246571,0.002465289,0.0005937055,0.00003223569,0.00001468872,0.00001886954,0.005654294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01711352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04733771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119769935","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1027","title":"Harm and Fault in Discrimination Law: The Transition from Intentional to Adverse Effect Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Statute; Law; Context (archaeology); Legal doctrine; Employment discrimination; Liability; Harm; Malice; Political science; Jurisdiction; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Denise G. Réaume","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02107537109339203,"gpt":0.3369209354750022,"spread":0.3158455643816102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007902748,0.0004179976,0.0006457437,0.001792154,0.005491514,0.009200585,0.001646065,0.0102692,0.001948916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154198,0.0003974923,0.000864481,0.000901664,0.06880342,0.01779581,0.008042442,0.01431865,0.000295798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007082851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004575686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006299661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003852894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902999,0.003593741,0.0004288401,0.0008867492,0.003545389,0.001245358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923593,0.005503845,0.0004921709,0.0006445059,0.0006082701,0.0003918651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002373658,0.000005286025,0.00009982174,0.000006824837,4.326832e-7,0.00005726444,0.001260684,0.00008098672,0.0000350447,0.9965301,0.0002276175,0.001693664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005095113,0.0000219873,0.0002965506,0.00007975777,0.000002649,0.0001451686,0.0009620877,0.0005001635,0.0001049211,0.9825984,0.01526994,0.00001320372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1243973,0.0223763,0.1316857,0.2028665,0.002462015,0.0001260199,0.00007090234,0.0001469149,0.5158684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700528,0.00367337,0.006032156,0.009751629,0.001260469,0.00007229197,0.00001495964,0.00004387214,0.009098482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05138993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036875568","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1107","title":"Conflicts of Interest in Publicly-Traded and Closely-Held Corporations: A Comparative and Economic Analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Negotiation; Transaction cost; Adjudication; Business; Liability; Law and economics; Database transaction; Economics; Law; Finance; Marketing; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Zohar Goshen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09212785268488419,"gpt":0.2867827677545304,"spread":0.1946549150696462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003238577,0.0001851357,0.0002836696,0.004967771,0.002536706,0.00457717,0.0007196791,0.001791868,0.00699042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009697672,0.0001862073,0.0005699144,0.004253898,0.004696435,0.003687114,0.001756752,0.001373119,0.0003053192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006440012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001245017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008159806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01222956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958702,0.002517524,0.0001053157,0.0001511608,0.0007801559,0.000575666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886935,0.008723251,0.001364961,0.0001981308,0.0007281111,0.0002919456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001047833,0.000142977,0.02081644,0.0001689224,0.00006022113,0.0005997288,0.0021579,0.001659243,0.0001430756,0.94406,0.002628975,0.02745785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001351986,0.0008365417,0.3688881,0.001645809,0.0004540186,0.005575501,0.04378917,0.01526268,0.001526174,0.3536729,0.2080544,0.0001593644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5104319,0.04996564,0.004640263,0.008557783,0.0001635542,0.0001040229,0.0003521767,0.000006707929,0.4257779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846846,0.009317698,0.0007330265,0.000347921,0.0001396684,0.00004431004,0.0001296178,0.000003439742,0.004599639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008159806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04672581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963547191","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1139","title":"Functionalism and Political Economy in the Comparative Study of Consumer Insolvency: An Unfinished Story from England and Wales","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Ideology; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Economics; Economy; Market economy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Iain Ramsay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03833989309812411,"gpt":0.3380792953903343,"spread":0.2997394022922102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003218801,0.0001746767,0.0005238096,0.003058773,0.008235973,0.007118243,0.0006042496,0.00189901,0.004692331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005713276,0.0002693019,0.0001870442,0.004249124,0.01824127,0.004758683,0.004099546,0.002507646,0.0001982422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01480927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003577956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1378093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2357636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959429,0.002787327,0.00008975858,0.0001309517,0.0003577205,0.0006913826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995378,0.003571564,0.0002601532,0.0001356977,0.0003726933,0.0002818829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000681587,0.00002895858,0.003604844,0.0001483024,0.000009623737,0.001393716,0.4632159,0.0001146353,0.000268854,0.5181317,0.002329613,0.01068574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002191351,0.00007949086,0.03816095,0.0006422475,0.00001668619,0.0008863117,0.7140012,0.0002747258,0.0002590021,0.04288454,0.2027247,0.0000482435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.73453,0.01244986,0.0009072141,0.02518092,0.0001503375,0.00002425301,0.00005613036,0.000005617254,0.2266956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873579,0.001919124,0.00012401,0.001091655,0.00003011319,0.00001877112,0.00001516625,0.00001040223,0.009432995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1378093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2740144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W577197919","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0004","title":"Organizing: Should the Employer Have a Say?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Freedom of association; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Legislation; Law; Jurisdiction; Labour law; Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Pnina Alon-Shenker","is_ca":true},{"name":"Guy Davidov","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04289689264298002,"gpt":0.3436806157805566,"spread":0.3007837231375766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004733291,0.0002284716,0.0002727713,0.0004825665,0.008685706,0.008222598,0.0008711826,0.005768959,0.006347367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007562615,0.0002145324,0.0002703168,0.0004359345,0.01242957,0.0039392,0.002354618,0.00434364,0.001463252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003241352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004934924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006470926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01306682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961969,0.001554538,0.0001083808,0.0004324756,0.0007641256,0.000943615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669,0.001772384,0.0003258793,0.0002450726,0.0004352366,0.0005313467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002897055,0.00005634069,0.002792834,0.00008206869,0.000007338991,0.0003798565,0.01922935,0.0001315128,0.0004455205,0.9123943,0.0309725,0.03347949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000281297,0.00008227626,0.005368643,0.0005495925,0.00002043083,0.0003455661,0.06644797,0.0002798424,0.0009472147,0.2925968,0.6332862,0.00004740307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.08574094,0.006223088,0.006548962,0.2489409,0.002852956,0.00005140392,0.00006653392,0.00005115978,0.6495241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099075,0.00242073,0.0009840601,0.03734922,0.001317903,0.00004442187,0.00005628833,0.00003587519,0.04788402],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008685706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02503234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514070696","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0016","title":"The policy battle over information and digital policy regulation: a canadian perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Public relations; Grassroots; Public policy; Influencer marketing; Legislation; Public interest; Political science; Business; Marketing; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Michael Geist","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007625764211486596,"gpt":0.3039728308897685,"spread":0.2963470666782819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01254969,0.00082447,0.0009450655,0.006692483,0.04710514,0.03053017,0.004147775,0.01342883,0.009640611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01831125,0.0006682579,0.0009823111,0.008290172,0.04510922,0.00782846,0.005397684,0.01244921,0.0005715047],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3902779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4733041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9781601,0.004320619,0.0004604109,0.001670937,0.008017564,0.007370425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757455,0.009711959,0.0009622709,0.0005852691,0.008576657,0.004418235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002016585,0.00002267048,0.0008791611,0.0001434544,0.00001031593,0.0002546137,0.006865951,0.0005767681,0.0001346871,0.9452342,0.03694473,0.008913195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004122462,0.00002701571,0.005188481,0.001242287,0.00006657178,0.0001827768,0.03257875,0.002052797,0.0004686197,0.1382694,0.819669,0.000212999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01494207,0.02178016,0.002006882,0.6321858,0.00113231,0.00007491213,0.0003346556,0.00007107096,0.327472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7820899,0.03716108,0.004727496,0.0981139,0.0008652582,0.00008360652,0.0002190087,0.0001206232,0.07661901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6097221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7071912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231325389","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1169","title":"Closing the Gap","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Luck; Epistemology; Action (physics); Inference; Philosophy; Rest (music); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Sociology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Arthur Ripstein","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05008031918610636,"gpt":0.3192618937435698,"spread":0.2691815745574634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009420057,0.0007484269,0.001249991,0.001778771,0.006384043,0.01377295,0.00263366,0.01317108,0.09928741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02707035,0.0003099733,0.0006655212,0.001854938,0.0114333,0.02588421,0.01201754,0.02008764,0.02028789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005229132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01006352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002765916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002858859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993856,0.002340136,0.0002514085,0.001123293,0.001386128,0.001042967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851173,0.007911553,0.0005474116,0.001259565,0.002286155,0.002878086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003419161,0.0000309928,0.0001735839,0.0002631452,0.000007933327,0.0001166573,0.001816356,0.00006023244,0.00007080526,0.4352623,0.5162756,0.04588829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005054455,0.000006240051,0.0001255772,0.0004052223,0.000001908038,0.00006729935,0.001339558,0.00002847303,0.00002402454,0.07771848,0.9202717,0.000006379908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001233008,0.0401127,0.002301452,0.8079146,0.03815665,0.00001429068,0.0002982687,0.0001455202,0.1098235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1003376,0.06378477,0.004164569,0.6437743,0.05003523,0.0001882686,0.0009703866,0.001030453,0.1357146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09928741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3321494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321602674","doi":"10.1515/til-2023-0011","title":"Good faith in employment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Fair dealing; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Scope (computer science); Business; Law; Bad faith; Transformative learning; Political science; Good faith; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Sabine Tsuruda","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02533934397680164,"gpt":0.2546357473286037,"spread":0.229296403351802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007280467,0.0002259547,0.0003071334,0.001054761,0.006187065,0.007813985,0.0009819584,0.004126909,0.007243571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01338637,0.0002580453,0.0003344523,0.0006453241,0.04989018,0.005291559,0.007409264,0.004902711,0.0008458506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003899806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004371629,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004376856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003478269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925,0.004141101,0.0002355745,0.0005709454,0.001308437,0.001243895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910158,0.005109265,0.0007539777,0.001217104,0.0009536818,0.0009500947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003047322,0.000006737055,0.000197945,0.000008343481,8.751765e-7,0.00004970666,0.002656731,0.00007560836,0.00002742948,0.9928416,0.001126083,0.003005849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007601858,0.00002077072,0.0006048229,0.0002154156,0.000003217436,0.0001487531,0.004460686,0.0003407197,0.0001586534,0.9108353,0.08319223,0.0000118863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.05019487,0.003580428,0.02080451,0.06550339,0.0005242954,0.00005742479,0.00003558538,0.00004338211,0.8592561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972291,0.0006625943,0.0009939332,0.003172056,0.000162137,0.00002776639,0.000008305818,0.00001444509,0.02266776],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007813985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03850329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513990116","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0019","title":"Taking notice seriously: information delivery and consumer contract formation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Boilerplate text; Obligation; Normative; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Jane Radin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01781268920850916,"gpt":0.2376327657073595,"spread":0.2198200764988504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01634317,0.0001753241,0.0002470484,0.0009562074,0.003685271,0.008089558,0.0008792434,0.004501313,0.01208358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05612746,0.0002866671,0.0003002308,0.001109387,0.01150572,0.008391135,0.004007011,0.00403343,0.0004055581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006482395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007209522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008478434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988356,0.006370148,0.0006081628,0.0008229864,0.002604205,0.001238544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303953,0.05283831,0.009073124,0.002850423,0.003025433,0.001817354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000181749,0.0001998033,0.01249187,0.00009021104,0.00001710481,0.0007140567,0.02644494,0.0009164166,0.0007235183,0.9239246,0.002736031,0.03155971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001305528,0.0002764785,0.02728615,0.0003622456,0.00008211901,0.0005949314,0.03978606,0.006692307,0.002459861,0.8376057,0.08459987,0.0001237416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4484958,0.001983641,0.02561302,0.07835018,0.0002696911,0.0001893682,0.00008609126,0.00008335709,0.444929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953804,0.000205148,0.0007296848,0.0007343944,0.00006559615,0.00001363149,0.000006664963,0.000008949456,0.002855515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01634317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08643204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474951546","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0017","title":"Technological tattletales and constitutional black holes: communications intermediaries and constitutional constraints","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; State (computer science); Constraint (computer-aided design); Business; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03281549725311105,"gpt":0.3141082639295648,"spread":0.2812927666764538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01469741,0.0004008695,0.0005606699,0.002206879,0.008611362,0.01512148,0.002460019,0.005293716,0.008915516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02441108,0.0006334513,0.0006119621,0.001733121,0.1178303,0.02528051,0.01222347,0.007657366,0.0005451028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006193853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005319403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003761616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002280457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.987931,0.006171365,0.0004881184,0.002052603,0.001912589,0.001444303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724475,0.01687501,0.002822851,0.005490773,0.001486534,0.000877362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000281076,0.000002930563,0.00008833594,0.000004907479,0.000001009649,0.00003113976,0.001902167,0.0001248356,0.00003294473,0.9969914,0.0001352715,0.0006821953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130003,0.00001558255,0.0002257204,0.00009135746,0.000006913944,0.00008746094,0.003351389,0.001000368,0.0003553755,0.9722273,0.02260778,0.00001768996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2250956,0.002408884,0.2156329,0.05000191,0.0003624752,0.0002177812,0.0001266708,0.0002279832,0.5059258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900346,0.0002933935,0.004233299,0.0008116799,0.00007173519,0.00008613143,0.00001518076,0.00003307565,0.00442089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07772833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2036014529","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1249","title":"An Examination of Convergence and Resistance in Global Tax Reform Trends","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Jurisdiction; Convergence (economics); Tax reform; Political science; Politics; Value-added tax; Political economy; Face value; Economics; Law; Economic growth","authors":[{"name":"Kathryn James","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01136061955675616,"gpt":0.2585174977168316,"spread":0.2471568781600754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004288996,0.0002387768,0.0004538274,0.00917663,0.002309074,0.006938103,0.0006401214,0.001211145,0.003998069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01141201,0.0002374978,0.0003660984,0.01306122,0.005606289,0.00642947,0.004266484,0.00222601,0.0003732028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005039948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001954616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008486812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01114731,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969707,0.0009511911,0.0001863553,0.000479012,0.0007565714,0.0006562007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940751,0.001828479,0.001691087,0.0005003189,0.001571691,0.0003333424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003462928,0.0001397205,0.1820743,0.000741312,0.0001656809,0.00161299,0.2374707,0.002147519,0.002156468,0.336706,0.006171673,0.2302673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002931361,0.00036602,0.6128488,0.0009116482,0.0001101324,0.001216351,0.187475,0.002047919,0.002423099,0.02755526,0.1649267,0.00008975584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8711337,0.004664131,0.000798394,0.008870639,0.00008292224,0.00004582652,0.0002271462,0.00003976111,0.1141374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995497,0.001781548,0.0002482433,0.0003794338,0.00005615912,0.00001306939,0.0001157727,0.00002167945,0.001887218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00917663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03656751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985756541","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1181","title":"Comment on David Enoch's Luck Between Morality, Law, and Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Luck; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Ori Simchen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05411186062236185,"gpt":0.334994920031379,"spread":0.2808830594090172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01209736,0.001196092,0.002355529,0.001525004,0.01154719,0.007855447,0.006703876,0.07533069,0.006656046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04099438,0.001220646,0.001449869,0.001685536,0.02240372,0.01178763,0.00603541,0.115426,0.005602633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006956496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008175253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04153031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06031299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929027,0.002053362,0.0004971626,0.001456621,0.002141178,0.0009490144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713208,0.0211879,0.001028642,0.0008465721,0.003428392,0.002187578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004468951,0.00001289112,0.0001584917,0.00005881613,0.00001345336,0.0001534777,0.001414395,0.00006020185,0.00005982182,0.0395698,0.9563934,0.002060513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007576691,0.00002448473,0.000922013,0.0004791184,0.00003231689,0.0002363548,0.004423354,0.0002372742,0.0003833963,0.07171346,0.9213693,0.0001033421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002141271,0.0008466761,0.0001224058,0.9898114,0.006989669,0.000004384474,0.00003580936,0.00001143459,0.001964064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002665493,0.0002959732,0.00009350543,0.9876436,0.005781956,0.00002182764,0.000009066544,0.0000179551,0.003470564],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07533069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08257717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122093128","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1253","title":"Ordinary People, Necessary Choices: A Comparative Study of Childcare Expenses","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legislature; Flexibility (engineering); Tax deduction; Context (archaeology); Baseline (sea); Variety (cybernetics); Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Order (exchange); Actuarial science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gross income; Tax reform; Computer science; Management; Finance; State income tax","authors":[{"name":"Tsilly Dagan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02928007342463327,"gpt":0.3613706878434686,"spread":0.3320906144188353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002206333,0.0001173988,0.0003990035,0.003251263,0.00397057,0.003057587,0.0006138199,0.0007901946,0.006256698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009186316,0.0001419272,0.0002593745,0.005292106,0.004939405,0.003347514,0.002369627,0.001165653,0.0001341804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008508785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002070766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07619768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1701611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962556,0.001942416,0.00009915181,0.000206389,0.0009420298,0.0005543188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933503,0.00463108,0.0008561241,0.0001755898,0.0006653102,0.0003216347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003270061,0.0003995006,0.100239,0.0003302768,0.0001424926,0.001893711,0.2221849,0.001220156,0.0006349565,0.6186171,0.004614986,0.04939591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006482226,0.0002662289,0.3454642,0.0005137507,0.0000828089,0.0007568203,0.5130692,0.0009283595,0.0006494534,0.03701349,0.1011255,0.00006528086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167355,0.001622256,0.0005060181,0.001058971,0.00001406742,0.00002336218,0.0001380628,0.000002079574,0.07989976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977177,0.0006303856,0.0001867462,0.0001190027,0.000007517299,0.00001325408,0.00007680643,0.000003346804,0.001245223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07619768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1515083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886156249","doi":"10.1515/til-2024-0021","title":"Imagining how U.S. federalism would affect third-party funding regulation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Government (linguistics); Legalization; Enforcement; Commission; State (computer science); Accountability; Normative; Federal law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04278326659619959,"gpt":0.2825691421958507,"spread":0.2397858755996511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01522636,0.0001764303,0.0003069961,0.001378525,0.004591426,0.006484742,0.0008238371,0.00299793,0.006630197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03860362,0.0002276937,0.000847754,0.001749936,0.005748153,0.003584592,0.002645212,0.00397575,0.0004084072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01039326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007840391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04215612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05709816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923334,0.003545292,0.0002412707,0.0006657745,0.001514708,0.001699571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609661,0.0232769,0.007379591,0.001380582,0.00500968,0.001987224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003373054,0.000507997,0.23901,0.0001264433,0.000158357,0.0005886097,0.009878891,0.00574683,0.001344554,0.6810818,0.02439452,0.03682475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002468819,0.001000244,0.4452709,0.0009467406,0.0006446628,0.000254601,0.04506334,0.00970515,0.005631213,0.3337941,0.1571936,0.0002486837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7095401,0.001337399,0.003064742,0.10651,0.00039489,0.00009387352,0.0003853199,0.00004368911,0.1786299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934946,0.0002107118,0.0003447963,0.004519264,0.00005754852,0.00002638727,0.00003039708,0.00000586616,0.001310457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04215612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08382148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193824776","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0015","title":"Property’s Sovereignty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Larissa Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0480782264763015,"gpt":0.3631084027986167,"spread":0.3150301763223152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006688677,0.0002639626,0.0006998059,0.001320094,0.003667402,0.008035894,0.0009988268,0.003544866,0.009137631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009588391,0.0003041362,0.0006740383,0.0009351564,0.0329945,0.007586408,0.004882821,0.005832773,0.001227102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003051908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003453167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003847437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001918678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941766,0.002105966,0.0003688125,0.001185991,0.0014539,0.0007086493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927526,0.003221084,0.0005309672,0.001606589,0.00144141,0.0004473026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001173987,0.000001919219,0.00003643033,0.000004920811,0.000001448838,0.00001114271,0.0002839819,0.00004105659,0.00003471161,0.9983183,0.0004805647,0.0007842988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000898998,0.00001300147,0.0001834978,0.00006076579,0.000005288314,0.00006703458,0.0001879554,0.0002771855,0.0001258607,0.9499882,0.04907421,0.000007918383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02453874,0.002641994,0.03802688,0.02425461,0.0003634517,0.00006288695,0.0001487422,0.00006359725,0.9098991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619753,0.001439164,0.004699891,0.003246408,0.0005702403,0.00009904312,0.0001081555,0.00003419788,0.02782762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009137631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03537357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}