{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":13,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"9eaf9d826608","filters":{"venue":"Uniform Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2963737236","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz041","title":"Conflict-of-laws rules on assignments of receivables in the United States and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Law; Statutory law; Commission; Insolvency; Corporation; Accounts receivable; Business; Choice of law; Exclusive jurisdiction; Database transaction; Harmonization; Probate; Political science; Accounting; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02529668980790063,"gpt":0.2286819294367185,"spread":0.2033852396288179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003211421,0.00009616285,0.0002494651,0.00003331032,0.00002533597,0.00002181017,0.0001696067,0.00001803355,0.0001010723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002202124,0.00005979513,0.00002312811,0.0002379404,0.00003553586,0.0001827154,0.00003970529,0.00006056308,0.00001336221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001649785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002835398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6238768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2943515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992961,0.00001268028,0.0002712126,0.00009757267,0.0002097472,0.000112708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993659,0.00006387288,0.0003079703,0.0001968437,0.00006098965,0.000004401016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003103639,0.00008062433,0.02522481,0.009167792,0.00003157435,0.000008234734,0.00004447183,0.00003499285,0.00004199053,0.9468338,0.01360887,0.004891733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002203459,0.00001324854,0.003660451,0.002886267,0.00002501602,4.020812e-7,0.00007148032,0.00007623572,0.00003163426,0.0005785454,0.9923512,0.00008516228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518914,0.004707764,7.712592e-7,0.001017031,0.00007131822,0.0005335587,0.00001720815,0.000005970871,0.04175495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495309,0.03278017,0.00001691751,0.01718925,0.0000409911,0.00001124324,0.0001772906,0.00001377761,0.0002394735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7185247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327833353","doi":"10.1093/ulr/17.4.599","title":"From Acorn to Oak Tree: the Development of the Cape Town Convention and Protocols","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Scope (computer science); Work (physics); Cape; Law; Political science; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04555235159467189,"gpt":0.3520435758984515,"spread":0.3064912243037796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007818224,0.00004246546,0.00007949968,0.000004682007,0.0002414272,0.00001754233,0.0001572589,0.00002030958,0.0001995944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006187355,0.00002186947,0.00003340857,0.00007971496,0.00005365877,0.0001217866,0.00003796892,0.00003472098,0.00002492307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004040714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005545187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009508393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003643007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993738,0.00007341004,0.000181433,0.00005174009,0.0002256511,0.00009396044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996763,0.00003804456,0.0001013769,0.00008674771,0.00006357411,0.00003390815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002493764,0.00002536942,0.0006478209,0.00009722143,0.00001100171,1.810644e-8,0.003302356,6.639931e-8,0.00006471208,0.9450029,0.0007277956,0.05011831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004156007,0.000004270774,0.004058355,0.0007861549,0.00001094689,1.047504e-7,0.0001073274,6.613929e-7,0.0003837383,0.001188494,0.9933826,0.00003572471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1140994,0.01011028,0.0005670073,0.04983789,0.001270129,0.06422409,0.00007394057,0.00008034318,0.759737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796061,0.001293057,0.002024998,0.006488095,0.0006388627,0.004372774,0.00003307375,0.00001263624,0.005530404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2185418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161256765","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unv009","title":"Iura Novit Arbiter revisited: towards a harmonized approach?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Supreme court; Duty; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Arbitration; Relation (database); Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05753428096148712,"gpt":0.2656760690896665,"spread":0.2081417881281794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006552414,0.0002117215,0.0003311203,0.0000858484,0.00009347968,0.000276027,0.0003143303,0.00004863934,0.0007665596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001047621,0.0001598397,0.0001473494,0.0003742463,0.00005855332,0.001435946,0.0001189854,0.0001392306,0.002241942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005705186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003557436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002560779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009506552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986155,0.00001389099,0.0004444728,0.0002555791,0.0004423521,0.0002282283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999028,0.000007140941,0.0002352633,0.0002845023,0.0004079805,0.00003716232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009372469,0.00006005239,0.00002460681,0.001049126,0.00002128386,0.000004151972,0.000006403198,8.815177e-7,0.000009418889,0.9614938,0.03641952,0.0009013283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000495617,0.000008275494,0.00002334821,0.0007549124,0.00007383438,0.000008185613,0.000007201258,0.000999273,0.00001784445,0.005614093,0.9917744,0.0002230435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002068615,0.00615941,0.0003936598,0.003864964,0.0001997907,0.0006037871,0.000004082171,0.0001566753,0.9884108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07173819,0.003349726,0.005427698,0.9096851,0.002588403,0.0001912223,0.001032892,0.00009138416,0.005895404],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327732972","doi":"10.1093/ulr/13.1-2.39","title":"Harmoniser le droit dans un espace multilingue et pluri-juridique : un point de vue canadien","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Geography; Ethnology; Political science; Art; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03511453166318413,"gpt":0.3120998124438367,"spread":0.2769852807806525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009618758,0.0003047068,0.0005876646,0.00003029399,0.001081437,0.00003814044,0.0004784852,0.0001060837,0.0009873187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001751979,0.0002961239,0.0002944673,0.0003680924,0.0008347332,0.000410183,0.000137339,0.0003351624,0.0002195505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006344419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008859129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2495019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4276554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977198,0.0004203513,0.0005108696,0.0003731326,0.0003724899,0.0006033979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986538,0.0002165017,0.0002342559,0.0002735355,0.0003354901,0.000286407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000616815,0.0001331236,0.0002710652,0.0003060488,0.0001318969,0.00009730043,0.0144511,0.00001468508,0.00001133251,0.9759475,0.007400093,0.001229661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002522529,0.00007048827,0.0007621681,0.001979834,0.00008764014,0.00007156407,0.0007493827,0.00007522489,0.0005526145,0.006697883,0.9883522,0.0003486858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04513968,0.2597569,0.0006201675,0.08392998,0.0008382084,0.001157312,0.0001623405,0.0000922978,0.6083031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6157605,0.3467042,0.001218097,0.008489896,0.0002873089,0.00007106362,0.00002789351,0.00003013697,0.02741094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212886798","doi":"10.1093/ulr/11.1.166","title":"18th ICCA Congress \"International Arbitration 2006: Back To Basics?\", organised by the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) - Montreal (Quebec) - 31 May to 3 June 2006.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; International arbitration; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03630724041973091,"gpt":0.2456224836615477,"spread":0.2093152432418168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009261689,0.0003923762,0.0003705317,0.0001191254,0.0003987195,0.0009336693,0.0008682127,0.0001015837,0.001890419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001839828,0.0003178413,0.00021288,0.0003858584,0.00008557551,0.001593172,0.0001298179,0.0001848591,0.001518433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005817335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002076283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01047993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05276521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969619,0.00002322865,0.0009311915,0.0004994018,0.001192535,0.0003917778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974073,0.00008196836,0.0004573505,0.0003367354,0.001660925,0.00005571297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006635319,0.0001222425,0.00006024519,0.0001109069,0.00004177025,0.000001226238,0.00001083753,0.00004938617,0.0002610031,0.4674733,0.5314338,0.0003689881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009723204,0.00002690264,0.0003828541,0.0003978922,0.00008991714,0.000003854057,0.00001386995,0.001615782,0.0003750992,0.003363671,0.9923649,0.0003929099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.00100009,0.0004812422,0.003358686,0.1064187,0.003896397,0.003529858,0.0004857443,0.0001599683,0.8806693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04633419,0.0005713007,0.002252289,0.8227308,0.008435538,0.001029489,0.01008111,0.0001682305,0.1083971],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7722723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332475208","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.3.633-b","title":"Peter Kaye (ed.), European Case Law on the Judgments Convention, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester/New York/Weinheim/Brisbane/Singapore/Toronto, 1998, pp. L + 964, ISBN 0-471-94089-5.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; History; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04607043350071265,"gpt":0.2981543683563499,"spread":0.2520839348556372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002525666,0.0004248723,0.0005368834,0.00002219279,0.00169449,0.0003473986,0.0006019049,0.0001375506,0.00761827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006048138,0.0003172743,0.0004175437,0.0002607318,0.00037489,0.0005493341,0.00007606149,0.0003872954,0.003243165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002696431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001372211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04212015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05882921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962416,0.0008732918,0.0008449989,0.0005682303,0.0007570927,0.0007148359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981089,0.0001326483,0.0003626761,0.0008835252,0.00009568671,0.0004165741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008062584,0.0004637548,0.00009977678,0.0008593414,0.0002891769,0.0003949438,0.007613269,0.000005334691,0.00001625622,0.3684542,0.2997766,0.3219467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003806348,0.00008737708,0.00003772694,0.002568003,0.0002019602,0.0001292454,0.0001245767,0.000003440666,0.000008632019,0.000334611,0.9957352,0.0003886087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003150107,0.10515,0.00002939384,0.01057802,0.0007731147,0.001857701,0.00005527566,0.0003209452,0.8780855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2027228,0.6621513,0.0006206787,0.05312293,0.00401994,0.0001321582,0.0003759378,0.0002595062,0.07659465],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8014908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971761648","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz025","title":"L’échange d’arguments autour de l’élaboration du droit économique à partir du Traité mettant en commun les listes des matières d’affaires*","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Member states; European union; Humanities; Welfare economics; Law; Business; International trade; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04476772419451526,"gpt":0.3109217059744589,"spread":0.2661539817799436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001171684,0.0001672664,0.0003874431,0.00003213442,0.000588686,0.0001092812,0.0003761543,0.00006072977,0.0009443631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002227257,0.0001422088,0.0001274886,0.0001771566,0.0002392372,0.0005547614,0.00008709827,0.0001162055,0.0002152316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002652699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008814487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00534502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03380868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985981,0.0003594863,0.0003795121,0.0001843195,0.0001986489,0.0002799284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990029,0.0003007629,0.0001923399,0.0001784775,0.0002459794,0.00007950889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005670033,0.00005975699,0.00663917,0.0002863616,0.0000673291,0.000001326647,0.002625774,0.000004759229,0.00002252409,0.9840227,0.001548461,0.004716105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000185229,0.00008081899,0.004569657,0.001359364,0.00005993767,0.000002266366,0.0005384912,0.0001946465,0.0001817531,0.01837257,0.9742436,0.0002116883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4933565,0.04338608,0.0001583948,0.01976708,0.0003625958,0.0019959,0.00005271527,0.0002062938,0.4407144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391332,0.05735353,0.000418742,0.001475707,0.0002021978,0.0001027022,0.00002655424,0.00001279139,0.001274539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315208986","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.3.619","title":"R. Brownsword /N.J. Hird /G. Howells (eds.), Good Faith in Contract - Concept and Context, Aldershot, Dartmouth - Ashgate , 1999, pp. 326.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Faith; Good faith; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01965605918304419,"gpt":0.2897990723030501,"spread":0.2701430131200059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007924641,0.0002161905,0.0004991993,0.00001983397,0.0004438983,0.0001378666,0.0003594671,0.0001137029,0.002207268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004846748,0.0001840581,0.000114405,0.0003752444,0.0005064145,0.0004417396,0.00004058253,0.0002677696,0.0002547573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008312551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001435604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02518803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02038102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981376,0.0001738635,0.0005095811,0.0003647136,0.0003134533,0.0005008217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990517,0.0001432861,0.0001508724,0.0003377043,0.00005645776,0.0002599916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008919572,0.0001012551,0.0002136309,0.0002169598,0.00002326475,0.00001188382,0.001910186,0.000002431137,0.00000680765,0.6934237,0.006758344,0.2973226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004560806,0.00002955996,0.0003139621,0.0008265171,0.0000448303,0.000004189201,0.0001910019,0.00001294868,0.00001223069,0.0007401422,0.9971168,0.0002517267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009152128,0.4178076,0.00001930954,0.01869498,0.0001193349,0.003047428,0.000173718,0.0002005084,0.550785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6505436,0.3365478,0.0001339718,0.008502822,0.000141576,0.00007646022,0.00003574531,0.00002302411,0.003995061],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400639897","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae021","title":"Airline insolvencies and environmental concerns: a comparative legal perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Convention; Business; Law; Political science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03754166092164882,"gpt":0.3537381226340304,"spread":0.3161964617123816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002395479,0.00006471547,0.0001252313,0.00001416749,0.0001907598,0.00007469321,0.00006571466,0.00002330138,0.0002810985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001372169,0.00005248318,0.00004589854,0.00006466409,0.0002590483,0.0003565589,0.00002026683,0.00007598547,0.0000854208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002202196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005553882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00284035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002217915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994128,0.00004728269,0.0001159081,0.0001249759,0.0002035688,0.00009548241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998105,0.00005411238,0.00002859454,0.00003997718,0.00002787924,0.00003899639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001194007,0.000009508907,0.000009338914,0.00008721134,0.00001493861,0.000003454831,0.002297228,2.835252e-7,0.000009483805,0.9962103,0.0006378202,0.0007192378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004249221,0.00002384933,0.00004533254,0.0007849696,0.00002426404,0.000003155785,0.001693008,0.00004980673,0.00001768282,0.004620761,0.9926208,0.00007389257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007428997,0.2198824,0.0001126479,0.01005383,0.0003265411,0.0006510246,0.0001075909,0.0001046283,0.7613324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429024,0.05250921,0.00007482328,0.001353008,0.0002040538,0.00001341557,0.00003367107,0.000003907528,0.002905538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4293779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320277435","doi":"10.1093/ulr/13.1-2.58","title":"Harmonising The Law in a Multilingual and Pluri-Juridical Environment: A Canadian Point of View (Abstract)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Law; Political science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04132749747778398,"gpt":0.2905188570617818,"spread":0.2491913595839979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007146054,0.00007960785,0.0001933162,0.00001715949,0.0004102591,0.00001328565,0.0001636024,0.0000240759,0.0001755464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009230452,0.00005494652,0.00005339876,0.00006680057,0.0008229231,0.0001074221,0.00003817075,0.0001184365,0.00003219002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008305776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009381403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2050656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3380532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991038,0.00008823238,0.0002810245,0.0001188717,0.0002183345,0.0001897488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999613,0.00008873107,0.00007379748,0.00009924132,0.00002589364,0.00009934268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002070884,0.00002744275,0.0001914605,0.0001801132,0.00001424547,0.00003485189,0.002897239,6.23468e-7,0.000003368255,0.9915432,0.0002241871,0.004881243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009060377,0.00001185571,0.001157217,0.0008974393,0.00001045431,0.00000744353,0.0001250598,0.000002089999,0.00001986999,0.000339567,0.9972693,0.0000691337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03826457,0.1402568,9.212074e-7,0.01136121,0.00007387312,0.0006635382,0.00001915274,0.00001533993,0.8093446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.811455,0.1851155,0.00006068669,0.003151666,0.00003363031,0.000004632179,0.000001970003,0.000005325011,0.0001716543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8002279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971261347","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz030","title":"Identifying borrowed sources in secured transactions law reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Statute; Order (exchange); Business; Security interest; Law; Law and economics; Law reform; Work (physics); Uniform Commercial Code; Political science; Economics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03014785700823235,"gpt":0.3282467482711998,"spread":0.2980988912629674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000654251,0.00009125652,0.0002187528,0.00002438989,0.00036394,0.00007208747,0.0002852494,0.00006332963,0.0009433032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007513357,0.00007784226,0.0001119,0.0004046102,0.0001091974,0.0004106852,0.00001579658,0.0001722148,0.0004801174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001831611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006531293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02288144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07134717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998968,0.00005623004,0.0002987494,0.0001806298,0.0002311066,0.000265287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994962,0.00003018746,0.00008607186,0.0002566541,0.00004491138,0.00008603682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[8.064433e-7,0.0000234703,0.00002146185,0.0002928535,0.00000434459,5.162511e-7,0.001083087,0.000002200757,0.0000163939,0.9970747,0.00002571354,0.001454506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001132618,0.000006616691,0.00004489473,0.000762015,0.00001835959,8.768106e-7,0.0005195005,0.00001130205,0.00003478373,0.002699091,0.995672,0.0001172463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00366682,0.009884924,0.0002267086,0.005406258,0.0001471319,0.001131347,0.00001437683,0.0001060771,0.9794164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748232,0.01849311,0.0003170414,0.002485095,0.00005568741,0.0000739872,0.00001282773,0.00001308494,0.003725907],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404588660","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unae043","title":"Clearing clouds of uncertainty—a principled approach to determining what qualifies as an ‘accident’ under the Montreal Convention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Clearing; Accident (philosophy); Political science; Environmental science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02947853798332438,"gpt":0.2906482028338807,"spread":0.2611696648505563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004609245,0.0001609438,0.0003228175,0.00003939637,0.000102731,0.0001339533,0.0001817583,0.00004262698,0.00001722093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001508585,0.0001081781,0.0001589355,0.0002138273,0.0000415326,0.0004535922,0.00006888535,0.0001544651,0.00004088561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006819583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001209634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003018308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004284275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999102,0.00004550632,0.000300718,0.0001758284,0.0001779396,0.0001979975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995243,0.00006595644,0.00003154363,0.0002880724,0.00003039291,0.00005973205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003333702,0.0001394305,0.00006112325,0.02239075,0.001262387,0.00001734655,0.008415976,0.03463985,0.0003897126,0.6350762,0.001615309,0.2959585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00107758,0.0007000911,0.00339913,0.04782832,0.00198015,0.0003376192,0.02429608,0.1601527,0.001115399,0.007375723,0.7494013,0.002335851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5039117,0.334744,0.003754841,0.001839405,0.00257039,0.003397355,0.00001584213,0.0016665,0.1481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674794,0.03165005,0.0002019266,0.0003291365,0.00008178857,0.00003314699,0.000008503555,0.00004058237,0.0001754605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.747786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4411377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214926895","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.2.299-a","title":"The Evolution of Legal Systems, Bijuralism and International Trade / Evolution Des Systemes Juridiques Et Mondialisation - Ottawa (Canada), 20-21 October/octobre 2000. Conference organised by the Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa in collaboration with the Canadian Department of Justice and the Department of Heritage Canada / Colloque organise par la Faculte de droit de l'Universite d'Ottawa en collaboration avec le Ministere de la Justice du Canada et le Ministere du Patrimoine du Canada.","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Library science; Humanities; Law; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004945834974078796,"gpt":0.2185761386404345,"spread":0.2136303036663557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001879281,0.0002102302,0.0004387234,0.00002544063,0.0007842201,0.00007278468,0.0003276608,0.0001107194,0.00001108588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001279786,0.0001546848,0.00003310869,0.0004662285,0.0008946072,0.0003210887,0.00002871839,0.0001418807,1.538849e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004868264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04586783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963929,0.001973937,0.0006157895,0.0001955063,0.0005657669,0.0002560921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976135,0.000679455,0.0008247545,0.0001844134,0.0005591835,0.0001387306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002434619,0.00009764927,0.004395694,0.002280314,0.0002986763,0.00003721266,0.01479698,0.001581123,0.0001188274,0.9557219,0.02014136,0.0002867795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001876643,0.0001267661,0.01344062,0.001403912,0.001119339,0.00007890016,0.04389656,0.001642914,0.000244232,0.00006479309,0.9358308,0.0002745548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8844133,0.01871853,0.0001710408,0.07479312,0.000276006,0.003018494,0.01048189,0.000009692236,0.008117899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925466,0.006628045,0.00004561139,0.0002408134,0.00002566348,0.00001081459,0.0002213263,0.00001091842,0.0002701611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}