{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":571,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":571,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"0786b22b38fc","filters":{"venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2039981008","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0014","title":"Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); German; Political science; Law; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Constitution; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Dieter Grimm","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0136201582477239,"gpt":0.2739484023916838,"spread":0.2603282441439599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007879758,0.00003518433,0.00007255057,0.00002224336,0.001167013,0.00001065292,0.00009080361,0.0000404438,0.0004011196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000319716,0.00003981912,0.00002528323,0.00003091228,0.002030393,0.0003019892,0.00001791728,0.00007348517,0.000002160539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006395601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007100809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999412,0.00003263143,0.00008758798,0.00006371002,0.000211609,0.0001924418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995565,0.00003030655,0.00005328671,0.0000214794,0.0001252614,0.0002131523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001449571,0.00001402574,0.06914519,8.990863e-7,0.000008630541,0.00006251569,0.001775138,0.000001240551,0.00000591359,0.9281664,0.000133045,0.000672503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002786601,0.00001632757,0.4676302,0.00003139851,0.00001036259,0.00002347744,0.007277226,0.000001529214,0.000003233128,0.0153955,0.5092402,0.00009189017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2247663,0.001097228,0.0003364394,0.002033074,0.0002012523,0.0000829918,0.00001296183,0.000006907116,0.7714628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992357,0.0002978562,0.0002287505,0.00005785925,0.00007640358,1.321435e-8,5.653644e-7,4.399626e-7,0.0001023947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8975836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124226099","doi":"10.2307/3650880","title":"Venture-Capital Exits in Canada and the United States","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Venture capital; Capital (architecture); Business; Political science; Finance; Geography; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Douglas J. Cumming","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeffrey G. MacIntosh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006414240146212012,"gpt":0.1579246202338254,"spread":0.1515103800876134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002452487,0.00007027565,0.0001197015,0.00002604071,0.0002247861,0.00004797121,0.000175186,0.00002365497,0.0004370023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002620803,0.00005776289,0.00003448263,0.00004874587,0.0001076398,0.0006146712,0.00006746907,0.0001273262,0.000001811748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001929018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006232307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995204,0.00002694142,0.00009325856,0.00006930988,0.000145562,0.0001445197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996963,0.0000335588,0.0001225363,0.00006682608,0.0000635769,0.00001725701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004289812,0.00008030829,0.02615067,0.00006650914,0.000117465,0.0002476904,0.001976906,0.0004295334,0.00002140279,0.9627306,0.00689461,0.0008553084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009967518,0.00003230659,0.05378399,0.0001364333,0.0001459979,0.0000730649,0.048138,0.001633922,0.0000222942,0.02118297,0.8644264,0.0004570423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791747,0.000870019,0.00004119012,0.0005650998,0.00024613,0.00006418017,0.000002292023,0.00000467475,0.01903176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991642,0.0002608323,0.00003080646,0.0004130278,0.00006208517,2.341246e-8,0.000005115875,0.000003337915,0.00006055683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4784868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251762122","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.001","title":"EMPIRE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE REAL SPANISH CONTRIBUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; International law; Political science; Articulation (sociology); Law; Humanism; Natural law; Politics; Vocabulary; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Martti Koskenniemi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04463799458015297,"gpt":0.2191546377784748,"spread":0.1745166431983218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001012338,0.00005562498,0.00008280399,0.000004853047,0.0005482578,0.00003754987,0.0001719666,0.00002764123,0.006186093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004955875,0.00004112017,0.00006770886,0.00000239755,0.0004821014,0.0003268784,0.0000548799,0.0001023836,0.000007363294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005542133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006868856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02117808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03743182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995859,0.00004514061,0.00008592124,0.00006345235,0.0001116859,0.0001079374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996413,0.00002778843,0.00006775189,0.0000566789,0.0001246781,0.00008182534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008005233,0.00004826538,0.0001358514,0.000001762807,0.00005500468,0.000008917589,0.005012818,4.391942e-8,0.000004023172,0.993833,0.0004149989,0.0004052502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006656727,0.0001220298,0.0022177,0.00002465,0.00005966403,0.0000266221,0.004434611,0.00001445703,0.00002136015,0.1140499,0.8782727,0.00009073597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02996146,0.0002641923,0.00002598069,0.001757752,0.0005731939,0.00004666827,0.00005514296,0.00001259747,0.967303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973726,0.0003040629,0.00004306428,0.0002607026,0.0004646274,2.561284e-8,0.000004049817,0.000002522542,0.001548289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767613032","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0052","title":"How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Transparency (behavior); Economic Justice; Work (physics); Legal profession; Affect (linguistics); Public relations; Law; Software; Computer science; Knowledge management; Business; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin Alarie","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anthony Niblett","is_ca":false},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04278348900904203,"gpt":0.321486638661484,"spread":0.2787031496524419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001577372,0.00009308192,0.0001730626,0.00001514577,0.001989271,0.0001042769,0.0008351413,0.0001024259,0.001337569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004566721,0.0000819884,0.0001468435,0.0000811011,0.004162054,0.001970655,0.00009623393,0.0001976252,0.00002028966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002498626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001226319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1682368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4977717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982952,0.0005191127,0.0001925077,0.0001400254,0.0005760945,0.000277099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978146,0.0005486065,0.0004308136,0.0002165707,0.0008587315,0.0001307104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001338997,0.00007553412,0.00001625087,0.000002798687,0.00004133823,0.00001069768,0.03205636,0.00001062008,0.0003399364,0.9551046,0.0003585725,0.01184932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003578862,0.0003505333,0.00001445511,0.00004517535,0.00008973423,0.00001536671,0.1647974,0.00007584233,0.006761371,0.02119413,0.8064788,0.0001413813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01397637,0.0005442279,0.03772092,0.01446926,0.001734639,0.0003703826,0.00001253387,0.00004562426,0.9311261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961477,0.0002265713,0.002351568,0.0001392925,0.0006155136,4.618988e-8,2.25881e-7,0.000005649831,0.0005134221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121924561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.275","title":"EXCLUSION AND EXCLUSIVITY IN PROPERTY LAW","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Law and economics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Setter; Position (finance); Property law; Business; Tangible property; Law; Boundary (topology); Real property; Political science; Sociology; Right to property; Fundamental rights; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Larissa Katz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02304513168927904,"gpt":0.2465368943110173,"spread":0.2234917626217383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002379434,0.00003521557,0.00007799811,0.000006933059,0.001447426,0.0000113053,0.0001443635,0.00004119267,0.0003034211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007402626,0.00003046916,0.00002959667,0.00002305706,0.0003999716,0.000460784,0.00006421795,0.00008522046,0.000002330874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001963604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006219808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4795797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7218105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995344,0.00006958297,0.00006242159,0.00007148166,0.0001523583,0.0001097536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997188,0.00001853582,0.00005564757,0.00005480061,0.0000558327,0.00009642432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007281487,0.0002410482,0.007508669,0.000009740302,0.00001535199,0.0001003483,0.05869813,0.00002031884,0.000781048,0.9245343,0.001274646,0.006743609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005334726,0.00004183078,0.01325945,0.00002124249,0.00000690705,0.00002301074,0.007266921,0.00003153187,0.00002997183,0.0009852322,0.9777099,0.00009056892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.313279,0.0002470609,0.0001270911,0.001585016,0.00004387055,0.00009839998,0.000003183458,0.00001133752,0.6846051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970623,0.0007981037,0.0004444138,0.00005102147,0.00004717608,2.706447e-8,2.381886e-7,0.000001571034,0.001595192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993791420","doi":"10.2307/825930","title":"Redressing Historic Injustice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeremy Waldron","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008626619001954255,"gpt":0.158160228567172,"spread":0.1495336095652177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005459633,0.00006349791,0.00008994446,0.000005739433,0.0004291725,0.000002302062,0.0002022564,0.00003062779,0.03041129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002112899,0.00006568677,0.00006920796,0.00001850581,0.001088198,0.0003598914,0.00008658988,0.0000910201,0.0001924229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001325738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002027683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01268557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003692159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994395,0.00003310756,0.0000736356,0.0001010622,0.0002294611,0.0001232746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996551,0.00001109504,0.0001245422,0.00008712334,0.000003450005,0.0001187492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003541435,0.001882731,0.009587677,0.00004057402,0.0001956973,0.001076122,0.06127103,0.004695027,0.02538488,0.00330047,0.6955947,0.196617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003430879,0.0001128627,0.005061422,0.00001461347,0.00003966748,0.0001288958,0.005334398,0.0002661317,0.00002310494,0.00004256804,0.988486,0.0001472695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06771363,0.002155644,0.0009908254,0.0002137486,0.0002904465,0.00004299211,0.000002514444,0.00001759981,0.9285726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820035,0.0005848667,0.003035713,0.000102518,0.0000498203,1.341235e-8,3.428908e-7,0.000005456004,0.01421774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9143549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994274195","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.341","title":"PATH DEPENDENCE, DEVELOPMENT, AND THE DYNAMICS OF INSTITUTIONAL REFORM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Path dependence; Perspective (graphical); Dysfunctional family; Property rights; Path (computing); Development (topology); Law and economics; Political science; Property (philosophy); Dynamics (music); Institutional change; Economic system; Sociology; Positive economics; Political economy; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Public administration; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Mariana Mota Prado","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael J. Trebilcock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007872377906210547,"gpt":0.2171389737213944,"spread":0.2092665958151838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004183625,0.00003258762,0.00006855162,0.00001175043,0.000756764,0.00001308428,0.0001913371,0.00002883069,0.0001850644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001264292,0.00002575971,0.00003072187,0.00001751263,0.0003569977,0.0003550199,0.00002251752,0.00005513566,8.19964e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004281705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001962633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01517271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1371864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994975,0.00003184312,0.00008687656,0.00003986875,0.0002705931,0.00007337087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996719,0.00001771882,0.0001091687,0.00002355818,0.0001393539,0.00003826626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005996786,0.00001396897,0.000322054,0.000001197593,0.00001681939,0.000004179327,0.006145147,0.000001433108,0.000003014438,0.9864607,0.00004545545,0.006926084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01003028,0.0002408977,0.2850236,0.0005046625,0.0001167986,0.0001256723,0.1282251,0.0009539454,0.0002543759,0.09282373,0.4809863,0.0007146443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09579559,0.0001981264,0.001038973,0.002122107,0.0001425277,0.00005444326,0.000003229695,0.000005380093,0.9006396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952351,0.0003060592,0.002940482,0.00004073753,0.00002790893,8.655594e-9,0.000001570035,5.646385e-7,0.001447604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8994395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626596183","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0044","title":"Law as computation in the era of artificial legal intelligence: Speaking law to the power of statistics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Argumentation theory; Artificial intelligence; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Legal research; Philosophy of law; Legal profession; Computer science; Practice of law; Political science; Comparative law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Mireille Hildebrandt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03252342726147227,"gpt":0.3224076401534819,"spread":0.2898842128920096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001457326,0.00007710853,0.0001668196,0.00001820958,0.00091658,0.00005376614,0.0006861377,0.00006475578,0.001058564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001030867,0.00006237174,0.00007294954,0.0001205718,0.001995123,0.0004409733,0.00006773033,0.000205514,0.0000204215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001845032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001238522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4736112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8874978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983722,0.0003805787,0.0003299791,0.000108302,0.0005991687,0.0002097628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986276,0.0003024812,0.0003096394,0.0001367971,0.0005563602,0.00006709106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009775733,0.00006858744,0.00003991535,0.000002493514,0.0000139571,0.000008864246,0.106847,0.0005194341,0.0000936692,0.8860648,0.0002543129,0.005989315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000169607,0.001277148,0.0006628463,0.0002385754,0.00009599551,0.0000196507,0.6400458,0.001074993,0.005434092,0.0752088,0.2754322,0.0003403346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2430771,0.0001288295,0.1416224,0.003788042,0.001581038,0.0006480524,0.00006914575,0.00001894504,0.6090664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957277,0.00001978313,0.003797358,0.0002324001,0.0001808095,4.998632e-8,7.464955e-7,0.000004049708,0.00003710058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8108559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030102691","doi":"10.3138/utlj.52.3.253","title":"Dealing with the Legacy of Native Residential School Abuse in Canada: Litigation, ADR, and Restorative Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Tort; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Llewellyn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01702648649084273,"gpt":0.2311818217262822,"spread":0.2141553352354395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002309802,0.00005535204,0.0001216537,0.000008536652,0.001103249,0.00002561029,0.0001528837,0.00002603114,0.0002807759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009349418,0.0000421435,0.00002029077,0.00004388887,0.0004633477,0.0007650908,0.00002354619,0.0001370863,2.794091e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001166168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001889765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999178,0.0001938863,0.00009779492,0.00007174672,0.0003360666,0.0001225122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991866,0.0001427427,0.0001995996,0.00003839127,0.0003499871,0.00008264499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002895331,0.00006332823,0.01846591,0.0000420032,0.0003215229,0.0001254567,0.8833268,0.000543494,0.0001038668,0.08713073,0.008547643,0.001039671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009354628,0.00007091039,0.06569548,0.000127722,0.0001127591,0.000003931894,0.915519,0.00005993999,0.00004347088,0.00008291459,0.01721842,0.0001299701],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633533,0.001858859,0.00003675347,0.003490351,0.00007654495,0.0001508404,0.0000066288,0.000004116115,0.03102255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982244,0.001035955,0.0003552522,0.00002738558,0.00005311771,5.479953e-8,1.489923e-7,0.000001694893,0.000301997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08704782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8485413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255801062","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.1.65","title":"THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF AN EXTERMINATORY LEGALITY: LAW AND THE HOLOCAUST","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Nazism; The Holocaust; Political science; Judaism; Impossibility; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Kristen Rundle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01150232003121091,"gpt":0.2558543895657031,"spread":0.2443520695344922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001087823,0.00003986163,0.0001077383,0.000002664143,0.003083399,0.0000286312,0.0002352005,0.00003085887,0.00003721215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002982116,0.00002539569,0.00006296058,0.00001638801,0.004135294,0.0003577777,0.00003372334,0.00007851305,2.598351e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008596563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007498213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2390629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4699548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992917,0.00023414,0.00009050441,0.00006058728,0.0002180948,0.0001049897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995173,0.0000976696,0.0001122086,0.00007700538,0.0001369971,0.0000588518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001319687,0.00002738412,0.0001786979,6.480837e-7,0.00001849002,0.000003945509,0.005651711,5.856572e-7,0.0000095248,0.9880636,0.00005712724,0.005856364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002684857,0.0003830977,0.1123258,0.00005853206,0.0001938034,0.00002806436,0.1708713,0.00002018563,0.00005932025,0.3910917,0.322048,0.0002352164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3527997,0.004043577,0.00003385173,0.004607987,0.0001681591,0.0001213168,0.000006435201,0.000009550024,0.6382095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989595,0.0007111055,0.00004123383,0.0001238638,0.00006915459,1.467202e-8,7.734371e-8,4.981093e-7,0.00009458807],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6461598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985749,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234787365","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.293","title":"On Non-domination","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Ян Шапиро","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02709649239832811,"gpt":0.2836578703277456,"spread":0.2565613779294175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005052232,0.00002853082,0.00005441151,0.000007644596,0.0007005301,0.000008441718,0.0001246044,0.00006374457,0.001025273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005876782,0.00003107289,0.00005112919,0.00001152732,0.0002344053,0.0005588051,0.00001309304,0.0001125016,0.00002590716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002777252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003697641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02969515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01796317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994602,0.00008646151,0.00004200604,0.00003011903,0.0002143423,0.0001668897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995674,0.00009213636,0.00004678933,0.00003884642,0.00006921629,0.0001855697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001967414,0.00004860582,0.00008056431,0.000001413093,0.000006793363,0.000001504487,0.009996054,0.000001079584,0.00001372299,0.9884877,0.0007844514,0.0005584509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001395707,0.0002732612,0.01201581,0.00009033593,0.00008488292,0.000007694897,0.0383081,0.0000247394,0.0001916732,0.2551529,0.6921501,0.0003048944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02064028,0.0000610877,0.0003660744,0.001574708,0.000302091,0.00002376083,0.000001902468,0.000005652541,0.9770244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985671,0.00006190332,0.0002382371,0.0001368252,0.0003226586,4.226856e-9,2.377404e-7,0.000001281467,0.000671754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784182983","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0057","title":"Don’t be so hateful: The insufficiency of anti-discrimination and hate crime laws in improving trans well-being","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hate crime; Harassment; Emancipation; Law; Identity (music); Political science; Criminology; Racism; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Florence Ashley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01511921194683337,"gpt":0.2775900421903866,"spread":0.2624708302435533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005010032,0.000086113,0.0001709515,0.00005984351,0.0005911645,0.00002799957,0.0002648354,0.00008690511,0.0007668764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001023405,0.00007864006,0.00006267164,0.00004549622,0.0005005228,0.0004265946,0.00004291154,0.0001726266,0.00000345938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001184321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000637173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3222606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2278654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990963,0.0001745161,0.000207941,0.0001345029,0.0001540374,0.0002326549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993959,0.00004478553,0.0002164613,0.000148273,0.0001183449,0.00007623471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009799722,0.002535315,0.1259648,0.00112599,0.0002828284,0.0001640995,0.4215263,0.00002241687,0.01079598,0.3740176,0.005809721,0.056775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003524045,0.001364375,0.9346282,0.0001073063,0.0002571934,0.0001383274,0.03088791,0.0002628891,0.0002799024,0.001505366,0.02673571,0.0003087204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.861074,0.0006090584,0.000393098,0.001130979,0.000359171,0.000101822,0.000006101181,0.000007718411,0.1363181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983366,0.0005021071,0.0001538297,0.0001030664,0.0001257998,4.052789e-8,8.698997e-7,0.000006281784,0.0007714296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8086634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8396758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982885878","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.4.909","title":"INVESTING IN DEMOCRACY? POLITICAL PROCESS AND INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Doctrine; Democracy; Politics; Law and economics; Foreign direct investment; Political science; Economics; Jurisprudence; Political economy; Law","authors":[{"name":"David Schneiderman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01147922101413508,"gpt":0.2221517628138832,"spread":0.2106725417997481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001919631,0.00007919269,0.00009451909,0.00004895829,0.0002297327,0.0001092325,0.0002137223,0.00004604938,0.0008603747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003519889,0.00008382003,0.00003551691,0.00002591345,0.0002063151,0.002072375,0.00008199731,0.0001913513,0.000009843223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007742152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002232845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02132361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08530895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993792,0.000007503405,0.0001542667,0.0001107952,0.0001970064,0.0001511841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999563,0.00001692439,0.0001433519,0.00005138667,0.0001877817,0.0000375918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002410915,0.00006142157,0.003541598,0.00001224055,0.00001481008,0.00001429798,0.00009450847,0.000006681647,0.0004186733,0.9955845,0.0001726041,0.00005449857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004537674,0.00006167926,0.02535962,0.0002081678,0.00007891036,0.0001708451,0.005309402,0.01543638,0.0004434108,0.4744599,0.4733155,0.0006184536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1587111,0.00001252084,0.0000443831,0.002221451,0.0002961505,0.00005540195,0.000001479276,0.00001428892,0.8386433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854851,0.000004095373,0.0008151489,0.01318738,0.0003522604,9.259303e-8,0.000005728185,0.000005125252,0.0001450597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8384982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125754116","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4006","title":"Self-driving laws","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self driving; Computer science; State (computer science); Law; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Anthony J. Casey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anthony Niblett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01632854652933821,"gpt":0.2709001571330333,"spread":0.254571610603695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007120615,0.00004447207,0.00009733969,0.000008754264,0.001351447,0.00004359491,0.0002894137,0.00009460706,0.001655415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009989028,0.00003829055,0.00009293691,0.00001654689,0.0003114917,0.001111417,0.00003961202,0.00009017222,0.000012804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004128845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000162305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06959414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4494321,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992315,0.0001413135,0.00006988561,0.00006337696,0.0002960163,0.0001978691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992239,0.0001214483,0.0001137323,0.00006379537,0.0002741897,0.0002029105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001692207,0.00006623604,0.002586035,0.000004067728,0.00007443662,0.00003016353,0.04473914,2.975131e-7,0.0003253699,0.9392454,0.003921597,0.008990307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004720683,0.00006351708,0.002202093,0.00005883295,0.000026128,0.000002740782,0.01887194,0.00000114021,0.00003059919,0.008579608,0.9695809,0.0001104216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03622499,0.0001965692,0.0004644338,0.008339616,0.0003559858,0.00004955824,0.000003156356,0.00004525304,0.9543204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925311,0.002088283,0.002001775,0.0000803226,0.0002429273,4.755305e-9,5.795787e-8,0.000003367912,0.003052196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9656593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031959760","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.1","title":"THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN THE POLITICAL CONSTITUTION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Water Resources and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Principal (computer security); Judicial independence; Enforcement; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Adam Tomkins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004430792985953958,"gpt":0.2082185734908777,"spread":0.2037877805049238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000448915,0.00002562718,0.00004507259,0.000002221424,0.0009191699,0.00002292765,0.0004827663,0.00003387417,0.0000899287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003701979,0.00001361916,0.00005606011,0.00001513168,0.0009870295,0.0001243359,0.00003257319,0.0001560838,7.075699e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006653857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007510676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2660602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993957,0.0001290636,0.00005902949,0.00003223692,0.0002523141,0.0001316955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996648,0.00007359508,0.00009020931,0.0000858742,0.00005016015,0.00003529239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001093225,0.00001603172,0.005816984,4.209303e-7,0.000003972254,0.000001632318,0.007324218,0.0000020249,0.0001287723,0.9859384,0.0001955677,0.0005610681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001548217,0.00001231442,0.02407437,0.00001099122,0.000008895191,0.000007698885,0.04909219,0.00001022102,0.00008931958,0.008045083,0.9184681,0.00002600565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5568216,0.0002177066,0.00000838771,0.006601671,0.0002330438,0.00007064054,0.000005092377,0.000001997888,0.4360398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996088,0.00005021855,0.00002107824,0.00004987431,0.00007735399,1.258636e-8,3.74697e-8,5.426824e-7,0.0001920526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7388272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399871532","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3671","title":"Law and development: Forty years after ‘Scholars in Self-Estrangement’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Embeddedness; Field (mathematics); Political science; Relation (database); Law; Milestone; Sociology; Social science; History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"David M. Trubek","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009156073736940879,"gpt":0.2280273548415313,"spread":0.2188712811045904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004156937,0.00005486244,0.00009864759,0.00001642609,0.0002940083,0.00003199507,0.000206077,0.00006437953,0.00108882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001021387,0.00005108905,0.00002879861,0.00002171595,0.0002657373,0.000958628,0.00006316917,0.00007735981,0.00001326327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004528743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000750562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02331802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3449948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992635,0.00008787073,0.00009753589,0.00009934732,0.0002502031,0.0002015047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996488,0.00002992368,0.00006820687,0.00006259901,0.00005318012,0.0001372726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003408543,0.0002739007,0.1238338,0.00002803077,0.0001925637,0.0006343015,0.7136481,8.921472e-7,0.0001205165,0.1297417,0.000677252,0.03050795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007359167,0.00002227466,0.02980058,0.00005298779,0.00001108526,0.00000184971,0.006169324,1.355732e-7,0.00001354682,0.0002559514,0.9628412,0.00009511443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5694484,0.001435085,0.0001308827,0.0003575833,0.0002520255,0.0001507644,0.000008668492,0.0000369767,0.4281797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937241,0.0002477417,0.005361625,0.00005257133,0.0000408781,6.3675e-8,1.18035e-7,0.00000347005,0.0005694002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.962164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239043492","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.4.417","title":"DIGNITY, LIBERTY, EQUALITY: A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS TRIANGLE OF CONSTITUTIONALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Constitutionalism; Politics; Ideology; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Law; Liberalism; Bill of rights; Political science; Law and economics; Human rights; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Susanne Baer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02809573664347014,"gpt":0.2739936088723604,"spread":0.2458978722288903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003724196,0.00006149057,0.0001980367,0.00001670542,0.001535617,0.00001660929,0.0002150679,0.000053683,0.001037166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002246982,0.0000614338,0.0001512005,0.00003984791,0.001265554,0.0004386308,0.00003723001,0.00007317128,0.000005193826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002800096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002149257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2488299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2290802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990897,0.0001223651,0.0001510085,0.00007830884,0.0004085488,0.0001501153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993988,0.00005839572,0.0001772927,0.00004712008,0.0002076135,0.0001107905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000736275,0.0001401405,0.0004076825,0.000001309061,0.0000594798,0.00001411854,0.003673981,0.000002073351,0.00006987721,0.9934561,0.0009948935,0.001106685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001895829,0.0002691948,0.009167292,0.0001184225,0.0001337573,0.00002045992,0.01624725,0.00000203875,0.0001089346,0.2246532,0.7471506,0.000233027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04316721,0.001097183,0.0003312812,0.001624582,0.0002772236,0.0000905113,0.00003505972,0.00001617095,0.9533608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987462,0.000257604,0.0003190743,0.0000813911,0.000149582,1.600025e-8,0.000001575252,6.804985e-7,0.000443868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768011231","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0056","title":"Prediction, persuasion, and the jurisprudence of behaviourism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Jurisprudence; Predictive analytics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Meaning (existential); Software deployment; Analytics; Data science; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Frank Pasquale","is_ca":false},{"name":"Glyn Cashwell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02331410895979049,"gpt":0.2745674372997067,"spread":0.2512533283399162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008486661,0.00004138643,0.0001010082,0.000009827667,0.00139168,0.00001830942,0.0003065543,0.00005598487,0.001293951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006714342,0.00003466882,0.0000584338,0.00003107289,0.004167662,0.0004206472,0.00005411745,0.00008218717,0.000003328698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009064061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006695767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1994254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1962288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992287,0.0001699143,0.0001247777,0.00007183979,0.000290476,0.0001142992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991837,0.00007158574,0.0001667432,0.0000897495,0.0004083066,0.00007994202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004102,0.0000917783,0.007511295,0.000005074727,0.00005558638,0.000008320487,0.2399933,0.000004459596,0.000282539,0.7365386,0.004216265,0.01088263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001638346,0.0007211234,0.02203747,0.0001953694,0.0003307404,0.00004606521,0.4183176,0.0002707825,0.002000943,0.02128227,0.5328493,0.0003100473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6932967,0.001143449,0.004481706,0.002828351,0.001101315,0.0002699851,0.00001598912,0.00003089337,0.2968316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980162,0.0006388439,0.0005233155,0.0000230915,0.0002088259,2.089565e-8,1.030435e-7,0.000001959904,0.000587608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7152563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074105530","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1119","title":"EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE IN CYBERSPACE? BODIN, SCHMITT, GROTIUS IN CYBERSPACE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Extraterritoriality; Law; International law; Global commons; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; The Internet","authors":[{"name":"Mireille Hildebrandt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008344743393117108,"gpt":0.246607821110647,"spread":0.2382630777175299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006067934,0.00008640531,0.000189541,0.00005429697,0.000395629,0.00003527593,0.000280149,0.0001941682,0.002209204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008345109,0.00009955046,0.00007520312,0.00006670356,0.0003018499,0.000991271,0.00005383805,0.0002619826,0.00004074678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009934134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001290318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4187845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3195043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987428,0.0003235472,0.0001387539,0.000139239,0.0002513077,0.0004043918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993412,0.00009494476,0.00007847339,0.0000914059,0.0001019405,0.0002919832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001051912,0.00006627838,0.002825685,0.000002273582,0.00001385709,0.00003728747,0.01328191,0.00004439058,0.00004367145,0.981781,0.001367143,0.0004312874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008462459,0.0008674389,0.1616045,0.000390894,0.00007932958,0.00004251151,0.2242596,0.0002372887,0.0002623415,0.2944734,0.3080815,0.001238703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3507964,0.0001057187,0.0002873296,0.001505921,0.001124476,0.0002350512,0.000003925487,0.0000208862,0.6459203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967024,0.0001042791,0.0006039899,0.00008742038,0.0003991062,2.103609e-7,4.795517e-7,0.000003594547,0.002098538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6873076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561364701","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.1","title":"MITIGATING STATE SOVEREIGNTY: THE DUTY TO CONSULT WITH INDIGENOUS PEOPLES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Sovereignty; Human rights; Duty to protect; Indigenous rights; Political science; Conceptualization; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Juan Anaya-Jaimes","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sergio Puig","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01102152311945175,"gpt":0.2380445124845087,"spread":0.227022989365057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006148047,0.00009771078,0.0001719056,0.0000114424,0.01492801,0.0003003303,0.0009075121,0.00005216563,0.00102325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004281281,0.00006793724,0.0000759055,0.00001874013,0.0008237166,0.0006434146,0.0000831533,0.0001565512,0.0000114234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003251259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006309229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6020645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9707142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988176,0.0001266011,0.0001103,0.0001267265,0.000428702,0.0003900778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987676,0.0001006565,0.0003542822,0.0002619668,0.0002925445,0.0002229473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001808273,0.00007747208,0.005908334,0.00001113927,0.0001618668,0.000159412,0.7575135,0.0000468148,0.00004168322,0.2308759,0.0005790812,0.004444025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001851518,0.0005863131,0.03720937,0.0002350604,0.0001637845,0.00008545768,0.5214623,0.000007732067,0.0002185198,0.003929036,0.4336605,0.0005903491],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6737564,0.0001071232,0.0001580413,0.0009172335,0.0001589774,0.000222806,0.00002815117,0.00001652753,0.3246348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958134,0.0002601127,0.0008786705,0.0001032749,0.000144584,6.96567e-8,6.545759e-7,0.000006602991,0.002792576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4330814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251764200","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.1.93","title":"Redressing the Right Wrong: The Argument from Corrective Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Indigenous; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Sanderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02225849214846924,"gpt":0.2682911348908973,"spread":0.2460326427424281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006293116,0.0000759107,0.000116923,0.000002954948,0.0058577,0.00006093574,0.0004337092,0.00005107562,0.001499957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008181023,0.00004330632,0.0001063149,0.00002622141,0.0007316932,0.000696104,0.0001040068,0.0002016543,0.00001401755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008115617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003386231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3134826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2389834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987661,0.0004075088,0.00008829984,0.00007247775,0.0003976594,0.0002679691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999104,0.000342083,0.0001947743,0.00009008099,0.0001553832,0.0001137225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001178277,0.0001617669,0.004185916,0.000004991766,0.0004812226,0.00001210233,0.8648837,0.00003298977,0.0001504306,0.08522715,0.0365178,0.008224071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002415073,0.00001593064,0.02933357,0.00002753836,0.0002561441,0.000002367546,0.39931,0.00001072172,0.00003865801,0.0002285287,0.5704445,0.00009051012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2159215,0.01237376,0.0005035436,0.01533362,0.004169668,0.0004155159,0.0000241243,0.00004755657,0.7512107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965931,0.0006063057,0.0003886983,0.0001046675,0.0007805995,7.80509e-8,4.889634e-7,0.000002676357,0.001523389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7806716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014514066","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0103","title":"The artificial morality of private law: The persistence of an illusion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Moral rights; Political science; Property rights; Normative; Legal realism; Morality; Sociology; Legal profession; Intellectual property","authors":[{"name":"Liam Murphy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05175094086343687,"gpt":0.2201683304165113,"spread":0.1684173895530744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002316301,0.00005975564,0.0001192267,0.000003614244,0.0007334556,0.00001422537,0.0006931389,0.00002754351,0.0001713329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006284752,0.00003832757,0.0001177848,0.0000399699,0.0007270827,0.0003602022,0.0001378628,0.0001167318,0.000001450754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003342099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002542563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005116058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007731951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991237,0.0001893403,0.0001579052,0.0001095367,0.0003027382,0.0001167654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993286,0.00007392558,0.0002652655,0.0001709838,0.00007722872,0.00008404013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006142052,0.0001822672,0.0001535021,0.00003238696,0.00002282423,0.00004250131,0.01000338,0.0002649919,0.6195162,0.362232,0.0002098087,0.006725923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00259453,0.003503205,0.01969392,0.0002254737,0.0003185287,0.0001539356,0.046121,0.01159367,0.7140606,0.01169729,0.1892891,0.0007487757],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796427,0.0001432751,0.0001458961,0.002992607,0.0001608066,0.00009152821,0.00002403417,0.000008691154,0.01679043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995042,0.0001227866,0.0001480901,0.0001290252,0.0000460758,1.026039e-8,1.771755e-7,0.000002446263,0.00004718715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3505347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7733983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258436064","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3244","title":"Polycentricity and queue jumping in public law remedies: A two-track response","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polycentricity; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Sociology; Negotiation; Legislature; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Corporate governance","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05971884230427966,"gpt":0.3008158458132109,"spread":0.2410970035089312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002234526,0.00006415355,0.0001482853,0.00002968585,0.0006386543,0.00007252562,0.0003436946,0.00006066533,0.0001664875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004059785,0.00007212557,0.00004572536,0.00005880602,0.0004418496,0.001334835,0.0001049267,0.0001480517,0.00000348405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007014588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002574353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4850567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8574675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986783,0.0004632393,0.0001215963,0.0001194877,0.0003558843,0.0002614413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990768,0.0001595762,0.0001140227,0.0001044127,0.0001973207,0.0003478793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003477872,0.0002326864,0.01486416,0.00002585993,0.00005419033,0.0005932883,0.15668,0.00002140911,0.0004467692,0.8125607,0.00711498,0.003928056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00187979,0.0002079906,0.005875916,0.0001629856,0.00003604771,0.00005494075,0.1769585,0.00004677506,0.00003916629,0.003719812,0.8107862,0.0002318743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.823656,0.001757193,0.00009102748,0.01158392,0.0003102811,0.0001068645,0.000003282743,0.00002455274,0.1624669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984505,0.0003823473,0.0006070663,0.0001051696,0.00008890171,2.012674e-8,1.673469e-7,0.000002573476,0.0003633069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8088409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5183724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992685277","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.004","title":"Remedial discretion and dilemmas in Asia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Remedial education; Legislation; Reinterpretation; Political science; Law; Judicial discretion; Judicial review; Discretion; Constitutionality; Government (linguistics); Judicial restraint; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Po Jen Yap","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00941150560976816,"gpt":0.2219157046297682,"spread":0.21250419902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001866525,0.00002552972,0.00006909932,0.000007883214,0.00034985,0.000008668512,0.00006581944,0.00002806875,0.0006496395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009810699,0.00002663587,0.00002390805,0.00001549332,0.0002838635,0.000287955,0.0000198958,0.00005029522,0.000004636455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001392141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004535587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.226684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7021551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996372,0.00004477547,0.00004492646,0.00004694455,0.0001457338,0.00008034718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998384,0.00002004086,0.00004032391,0.00001836759,0.00003936691,0.00004355209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000842426,0.00002976046,0.06049819,0.000002021604,0.00001925484,0.0000154417,0.01087312,0.000004981478,0.00007716101,0.9232219,0.0001654401,0.005008511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001658191,0.0001592423,0.358456,0.0001308005,0.00003507215,0.000009382838,0.1098056,0.00002018571,0.00001241718,0.02026824,0.509225,0.0002198908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4307854,0.0004918508,0.00009227209,0.001037412,0.0002638383,0.00006272524,0.000001798613,0.000005182947,0.5672595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988309,0.0006882937,0.0001055144,0.00001106963,0.00007068364,7.900204e-9,2.315265e-7,5.698756e-7,0.0002926901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7784656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248687743","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.1.1","title":"THE PUZZLE OF MARTIAL LAW","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Martial law; Proclamation; Political science; Comparative law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"David Dyzenhaus","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008655443699399041,"gpt":0.2413368030932218,"spread":0.2326813593938228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002437153,0.00003086678,0.00007274323,0.0000031734,0.001562639,0.0000138125,0.0002347501,0.00002825161,0.0004348225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001514685,0.00002703756,0.00007427341,0.0000144386,0.001292065,0.0002104725,0.00001318393,0.00005805222,0.000002066432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001214256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002293214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1315384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2507382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994602,0.00008397655,0.00007475095,0.00003511327,0.000214774,0.0001312201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995509,0.00006823319,0.0001083646,0.00005646884,0.0001286245,0.00008738325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002423881,0.0000176442,0.00004771672,3.868489e-7,0.0000104646,0.00000405269,0.0008106317,0.000004572016,0.00002747811,0.9969821,0.001026821,0.001043881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001317083,0.00005289511,0.0004074053,0.000006678982,0.00001490749,0.000003808958,0.005371452,0.000001236715,0.00002869226,0.00257183,0.991375,0.00003440896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004326164,0.000322453,0.0001908963,0.001953901,0.000144734,0.00002668904,0.000006695361,0.000005026941,0.9930235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971322,0.0002231868,0.0003435653,0.0001073172,0.0001330371,2.81262e-9,2.329781e-7,6.814767e-7,0.002059759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790078636","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0047","title":"Transformative legal technology and the rule of law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Economic Justice; Cognition; Rule of law; Law; Legal profession; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Paul Gowder","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006344534758098222,"gpt":0.2256299003473525,"spread":0.2192853655892543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003429455,0.00003565158,0.0001053511,0.000002392675,0.001320861,0.0000130023,0.000231748,0.00008831288,0.0004866415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007148132,0.00002612759,0.00006837971,0.00003407982,0.004764745,0.0004297449,0.00002422639,0.0001033524,0.000001247981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005757929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003509775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03903895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1407161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995696,0.00007852558,0.00006580374,0.00004109892,0.000146147,0.00009883149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996272,0.00002567561,0.00009108842,0.00004666125,0.0001711839,0.00003820832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005349949,0.00001116547,0.00001580215,0.000002149468,0.00003395285,9.458473e-7,0.1113886,1.358462e-7,0.00004220722,0.8874814,0.0003839713,0.0005861378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00101531,0.00007188071,0.00005239706,0.00001901541,0.00003977076,0.00000931207,0.175248,0.000003331693,0.0002883992,0.01449595,0.8087106,0.000046043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03781732,0.0008125068,0.0001747432,0.00580467,0.0001163128,0.00007416491,0.000006624188,0.0000115159,0.9551821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976413,0.0006699149,0.0005537692,0.00009234287,0.00007531014,1.769389e-8,1.259699e-7,0.000001125348,0.0009660608],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.959824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044835123","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1117-3","title":"TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND CRIMINALIZATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Universal jurisdiction; Relation (database); Acknowledgement; Sociology; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Lindsay Farmer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01079713037986742,"gpt":0.2385564415872736,"spread":0.2277593112074062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009893355,0.00002242496,0.00003876151,0.000005264124,0.000749866,0.00003942915,0.0000747261,0.00002677637,0.0009575172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005689929,0.00002470702,0.00002080429,0.00001032359,0.0001140613,0.0005813382,0.000016438,0.00003599826,0.000005286667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001064752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002725318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.305547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11761,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997077,0.00003615154,0.00004473778,0.00004175217,0.0001067158,0.00006293254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997301,0.0000111658,0.00005649967,0.00003119158,0.00009742953,0.00007366981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001539635,0.00006110724,0.001900778,0.000006089662,0.00002305995,0.000001915587,0.02568272,0.000007869309,0.000594124,0.9472193,0.01011958,0.01436803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002502087,0.0000306226,0.009835538,0.00000833326,0.00002222789,0.000002525341,0.01494692,0.00006053308,0.00001757782,0.002636058,0.9721365,0.00005294858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2981476,0.0003797721,0.006737577,0.004291568,0.0009528993,0.0002799064,0.000006250513,0.00004574133,0.6891587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979632,0.0003086319,0.0006533847,0.00001497339,0.0003644159,4.416389e-8,6.223807e-7,0.000001250668,0.0006934889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009613640","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.499","title":"Electoral Fairness and the Law of Democracy: A Structural Rights Approach to Judicial Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Law; Deference; Fundamental rights; Gerrymandering; Redistricting; Law and economics; Judicial review; Human rights; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Yasmin Dawood","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01557367090440112,"gpt":0.2502169757550178,"spread":0.2346433048506167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005218486,0.00005929542,0.0002215392,0.000006331767,0.001805756,0.00001007011,0.0002013123,0.00003059442,0.0001284541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002400126,0.00004210099,0.00008370117,0.00004219026,0.001301653,0.0003766155,0.00006537471,0.00007639093,0.000001147011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001037679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004945548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.362905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2199748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991934,0.0001751665,0.0001099349,0.00005979716,0.0002855673,0.0001761572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995117,0.00004937848,0.000121546,0.00004523403,0.0001540707,0.0001180616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007290074,0.00001718825,0.0007791828,0.00001192951,0.00004808614,5.681126e-7,0.005046377,5.739751e-7,0.000003912308,0.9930567,0.0005466949,0.0004159016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004577926,0.0002286509,0.04169109,0.00111477,0.00120801,0.0001160441,0.03527059,0.00001464559,0.00006164936,0.1632553,0.7516763,0.0007850126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07906134,0.05036882,0.0004539264,0.00449815,0.0005571807,0.0005065494,0.00001647066,0.00001722858,0.8645203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979959,0.001177185,0.0003689656,0.0001715148,0.0002371585,7.344939e-8,3.731221e-7,0.000001116338,0.00004777132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9189345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312964853","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3622","title":"Between universalism and relativism: Reflections on the evolution of law and development studies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Political science; Bureaucracy; Washington Consensus; Universal suffrage; Law and development; Context (archaeology); Relativism; Politics; Blueprint; Political economy; Developing country; Development economics; Democracy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Epistemology; Development studies; History","authors":[{"name":"Michael J. Trebilcock","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0705247228216803,"gpt":0.3010891666861169,"spread":0.2305644438644366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000399455,0.00004350937,0.00009575023,0.00001540904,0.00150641,0.000008128523,0.0000792968,0.0000326521,0.0001170826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000129008,0.0000259975,0.0000169572,0.0000138497,0.0006764866,0.000245939,0.00004106938,0.00004339615,0.000001025747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005777304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009954307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01476482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1487861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994884,0.0001094351,0.00008015194,0.00006695627,0.0001691363,0.00008597023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995363,0.0001501894,0.0001031579,0.00004014326,0.0001133565,0.00005686229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001373288,0.00000941634,0.0006091226,0.000002196983,0.0000865987,0.000001678889,0.05880038,1.494396e-7,0.00002796112,0.9388853,0.0002233242,0.001340148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008647189,0.0001559558,0.0365083,0.0002565758,0.00005997519,0.000003278341,0.1450186,2.237261e-7,0.0001195991,0.02561144,0.791241,0.0001603167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5337369,0.00100591,0.001540961,0.005251724,0.0001932959,0.00018956,0.000007553946,0.00002170727,0.4580524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969545,0.000510003,0.0008232906,0.00001513052,0.00002820143,2.158916e-8,7.208273e-8,0.000001425116,0.001667337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9132739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071745665","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0045","title":"Person, place, or thing?: Property and the structuring of social relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Property rights; Intuition; Structuring; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01396040738108468,"gpt":0.2380048575908833,"spread":0.2240444502097986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003577417,0.00002985585,0.00007275044,0.00000535749,0.001922886,0.00002473959,0.00018567,0.00004396525,0.0009377296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003262863,0.0000178785,0.00004491987,0.00001924689,0.0006805978,0.0002853538,0.00003319486,0.0001591467,6.662944e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004432163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009553435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07388999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3291917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996231,0.00005901755,0.00005980293,0.00004618632,0.0001386119,0.00007327312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996419,0.00005709138,0.0001201955,0.00004599915,0.00009069625,0.00004410491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009458177,0.0000151553,0.0003708386,0.000003403118,0.00002605232,8.747921e-7,0.0954606,0.000003573785,0.0001864425,0.9016161,0.0008296221,0.001392758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00174806,0.00003160014,0.01272727,0.00001348062,0.00008524245,0.0000124562,0.1484376,0.0001777035,0.00002640306,0.001767506,0.834864,0.000108625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4446351,0.00006845636,0.0001830567,0.008439128,0.0001374616,0.0001906324,0.00001353686,0.00001424357,0.5463184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943316,0.00003685592,0.000988478,0.00001398169,0.00009896553,3.570491e-8,1.886255e-7,0.00000157038,0.00452832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079936065","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0010","title":"The Impact of Hot Issue Markets and Noise Traders on Stock Exchange Listing Standards","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Stock exchange; Business; Capital market; Mandate; Incentive; Public interest; Market maker; Primary market; Accounting; Finance; Economics; Stock market; Corporate governance; Market economy; Law","authors":[{"name":"A. Douglas Harris","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01539734730582855,"gpt":0.2118321612226256,"spread":0.196434813916797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004758435,0.00008810868,0.0002117725,0.00002272002,0.0003912277,0.00004125869,0.0001432549,0.00004647858,0.0005529488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002240171,0.00007851209,0.000120082,0.00002308487,0.0001844769,0.000299836,0.00002490256,0.00008535116,9.320321e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002760824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003072869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03827408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006944265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994562,0.00002175781,0.0002033966,0.0001029533,0.00005875756,0.0001569615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993922,0.00005083743,0.0003577783,0.00009739293,0.00005235042,0.00004946676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002447293,0.0004315345,0.03529184,0.000143383,0.0004101979,0.00005026689,0.004001739,0.0003157918,0.0001411181,0.8659412,0.0671823,0.02364332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001913233,0.001060549,0.7472223,0.0001044631,0.00002220556,0.00001605512,0.001836737,0.0006361727,0.00003333543,0.009351433,0.2375153,0.0002882567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5256264,0.007609149,0.0001029673,0.000233676,0.0001683012,0.0001077006,0.0002160476,0.000006507692,0.4659292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968787,0.002099175,0.0001377516,0.00001057483,0.00007739983,4.67077e-8,0.00000128513,0.00000560555,0.0007894222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8565898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125353358","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.445","title":"PERSON, PLACE, OR THING? PROPERTY AND THE STRUCTURING OF SOCIAL RELATIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Structuring; Property rights; Epistemology; Intuition; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Lisa M. Austin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0137910174835094,"gpt":0.2270170217185577,"spread":0.2132260042350483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004928429,0.00004210648,0.0001104489,0.000008759269,0.001927746,0.00003276326,0.0002134334,0.00005631148,0.002164013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004362275,0.00002018,0.00005602158,0.00002080997,0.0009264461,0.0004662713,0.00003176532,0.0002121714,6.893658e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005064844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001155849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1296217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4085228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994705,0.0001077336,0.00007308929,0.00005604725,0.0001915866,0.0001009995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996065,0.00005112381,0.0001256396,0.00004616974,0.0001142754,0.00005625773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006455868,0.00003388085,0.0004746931,0.000009609232,0.00008161477,0.00000942216,0.1911853,0.000002654642,0.0003399039,0.799889,0.002378579,0.004949788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00236753,0.00006899094,0.005399639,0.00002081826,0.00008110094,0.00002305673,0.05492527,0.0001324745,0.00003569349,0.0009107749,0.9359183,0.0001163241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3243057,0.0001894094,0.00006351895,0.007866417,0.0003279183,0.0002019731,0.000008463411,0.00001805766,0.6670185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864755,0.00006464405,0.0005602805,0.00002003473,0.0001448449,1.740184e-8,1.643159e-7,0.000001981208,0.0127325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231632637","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.2.185","title":"REPRESENTING INDIGENOUS SELF-DETERMINATION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Opposition (politics); Indigenous rights; Legislature; Political science; Political economy; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Self-determination; Law","authors":[{"name":"Michael A. Murphy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01326225257563852,"gpt":0.2537552124503699,"spread":0.2404929598747313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005026574,0.00004900894,0.00009722447,0.00002573064,0.01647376,0.00001599316,0.0002298421,0.00007912292,0.0005012615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002714342,0.00005252018,0.00006638997,0.0000356104,0.0001921971,0.0006556684,0.000001805502,0.00009964894,0.00001053432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000638335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002575289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7508659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9711137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990677,0.0001872532,0.0001159605,0.00008937299,0.000296792,0.0002428883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992497,0.00004128437,0.0002100781,0.00008520934,0.0002712804,0.0001424342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001050955,0.0001173147,0.001784746,0.00000860944,0.00001678723,0.00004333159,0.9690058,0.000002226604,0.000002720428,0.02835081,0.00009924329,0.0005579149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002525845,0.00005289429,0.003794903,0.00001743138,0.00001957895,0.00006860456,0.03671585,0.000007576825,0.00003494128,0.0002108183,0.9587281,0.00009665912],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4604251,0.0002215749,0.0001315538,0.0000498224,0.0003520581,0.0001090366,0.000001008748,0.00002877882,0.5386811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743376,0.01255457,0.003124863,0.000008803439,0.0004972226,9.316873e-9,0.000001574187,0.000004933003,0.009470467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9586289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9848067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971997154","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0000","title":"Representing Indigenous Self-Determination","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Geography; Political science; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Michael A. Murphy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01326225257563852,"gpt":0.2537552124503699,"spread":0.2404929598747313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005026574,0.00004900894,0.00009722447,0.00002573064,0.01647376,0.00001599316,0.0002298421,0.00007912292,0.0005012615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002714342,0.00005252018,0.00006638997,0.0000356104,0.0001921971,0.0006556684,0.000001805502,0.00009964894,0.00001053432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000638335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002575289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7508659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9711137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990677,0.0001872532,0.0001159605,0.00008937299,0.000296792,0.0002428883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992497,0.00004128437,0.0002100781,0.00008520934,0.0002712804,0.0001424342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001050955,0.0001173147,0.001784746,0.00000860944,0.00001678723,0.00004333159,0.9690058,0.000002226604,0.000002720428,0.02835081,0.00009924329,0.0005579149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002525845,0.00005289429,0.003794903,0.00001743138,0.00001957895,0.00006860456,0.03671585,0.000007576825,0.00003494128,0.0002108183,0.9587281,0.00009665912],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4604251,0.0002215749,0.0001315538,0.0000498224,0.0003520581,0.0001090366,0.000001008748,0.00002877882,0.5386811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743376,0.01255457,0.003124863,0.000008803439,0.0004972226,9.316873e-9,0.000001574187,0.000004933003,0.009470467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9586289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9848067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150515959","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.191","title":"PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC RIGHT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Private law; Law; Tort; Unjust enrichment; Public law; Public interest; Political science; Economic Justice; Exclusive right; Common law; Commercial law; Liability; Law and economics; Normative; Private rights; Business; Sociology; Intellectual property","authors":[{"name":"Ernest J. Weinrib","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02653600188505005,"gpt":0.2331907195830554,"spread":0.2066547176980054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000180424,0.0000324486,0.00005937299,0.000005518194,0.001143102,0.00003038293,0.0002107537,0.00003598967,0.002199542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004446704,0.00003305259,0.00003477165,0.00001591632,0.0003900687,0.0006089158,0.00005079899,0.00006208979,0.000006386233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008743726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003311244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2073144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4694005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996068,0.00004406185,0.00005234429,0.00005968977,0.0001148521,0.0001222026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996298,0.00001112766,0.00007159852,0.00006342345,0.00006918833,0.0001548861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004451812,0.00002736226,0.0004774625,9.704557e-7,0.00001102292,0.000004010748,0.005632473,3.710558e-8,0.00002048216,0.9931627,0.0001944718,0.0004645623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001722871,0.00001916863,0.002190022,0.000004534506,0.00001203512,0.000003844001,0.005503806,0.000002307509,0.00002338053,0.007363654,0.9846539,0.00005103222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03352234,0.0001474228,0.0003215694,0.0006768405,0.00004741042,0.00004330657,0.000003435601,0.00001317979,0.9652245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967847,0.0002739386,0.002100363,0.00006960508,0.00005069968,1.84528e-8,2.522757e-7,0.000001674206,0.0007186963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122025944","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3558","title":"The utopian promise of private law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Dominion; Economic Justice; Private property; Utopia; Law and economics; Private law; Distributive property; Function (biology); Law; Sociology; Distributive justice; Property (philosophy); Political science; Public law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Hanoch Dagan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02501029058460926,"gpt":0.2639183396345651,"spread":0.2389080490499559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006041838,0.00003607667,0.00007986584,0.00000349213,0.001108521,0.00001215559,0.0003546777,0.0000621025,0.0003238453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007380379,0.00002320057,0.00007977545,0.00001184435,0.00151471,0.0003335829,0.00004183281,0.0000814575,0.000004730028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001546525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008120785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04168154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1374948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992871,0.0001588413,0.00008681348,0.0000486061,0.0002438211,0.0001748634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993584,0.0001873765,0.0001026006,0.00009026952,0.0001248669,0.0001364689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003489097,0.00001699852,0.00005927324,0.000002470507,0.0000168564,0.000003274545,0.002510423,9.648771e-8,0.0001271458,0.9958403,0.000118981,0.001269346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000413518,0.00006277407,0.0005036445,0.00005534176,0.00001879634,0.000001671579,0.002113567,5.486489e-7,0.0002373759,0.2543806,0.7421551,0.00005702699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01607729,0.0001559907,0.0001518482,0.01332423,0.0002020179,0.00006220621,0.000008622885,0.000009965048,0.9700078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973488,0.0003862748,0.0001747677,0.0000629651,0.000128551,1.011376e-8,4.471023e-8,0.000001669901,0.001896923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079831649","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2419","title":"Blaming the victim: Canadian law, causation, and residential schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Blame; Tort; Notice; Law; Damages; Prison; Supreme court; Criminology; Political science; Attendance; Estate; Sociology; Liability; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Kent Roach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005574235348561375,"gpt":0.2072173780900473,"spread":0.2016431427414859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006875427,0.00005456486,0.00009487146,0.00001674575,0.002816337,0.0001035397,0.0002668925,0.00006043588,0.0006745087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005008113,0.00005106943,0.00004588446,0.00002297466,0.0003456973,0.0005291858,0.00002330337,0.0001369329,0.000006307356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002395232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001730121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992118,0.0001963894,0.00009276067,0.00008254201,0.0002100801,0.0002064022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993758,0.00005791827,0.00009956754,0.00009587483,0.0001284817,0.0002424121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002614015,0.00001204038,0.01353111,0.000003991219,0.00006887125,0.00001936596,0.0573482,0.00001911728,0.00008387031,0.9221467,0.004903405,0.00183721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006656584,0.00004752648,0.03804766,0.00005845586,0.00009297803,0.00001952018,0.0858486,0.00005974485,0.00005071523,0.0029282,0.8719965,0.0001844901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4184553,0.0002870326,0.0002897728,0.004798735,0.000387623,0.0001194585,0.000006005073,0.00001771507,0.5756384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985701,0.0002524712,0.0001855763,0.0002653206,0.0002865986,1.382026e-8,6.102105e-7,0.000003158769,0.0004360938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9192185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416877329","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3808","title":"Enhancing moral relationships through strict liability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Liability; Strict liability; Doctrine; Moral responsibility; Law and economics; Default rule; Blame; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Seana Valentine Shiffrin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04650170053143371,"gpt":0.2239992939525606,"spread":0.1774975934211269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002737053,0.0000702688,0.0001085727,0.000009585642,0.0006202735,0.00001260205,0.0002790175,0.00004892727,0.001697117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002737084,0.00005420638,0.00009622343,0.00003408135,0.0001929478,0.001234118,0.00006320248,0.0001256107,0.00003020925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002328251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003861156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003521126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01119524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991032,0.0002349411,0.0001297242,0.0001534356,0.0002090734,0.000169572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999312,0.0002456739,0.0001389392,0.000154916,0.00005874116,0.0000896919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003868949,0.0004170396,0.02040445,0.00003438037,0.00003455002,0.0002341783,0.005704796,0.00004033785,0.5599,0.397577,0.003670637,0.0115957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007205949,0.001155793,0.1433954,0.0006352739,0.0001931204,0.0005101554,0.007495601,0.0001434161,0.4169078,0.0705091,0.3504722,0.001376198],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7179391,0.000241419,0.01593884,0.001421614,0.0006721904,0.0001338577,0.00003595733,0.0000683481,0.2635487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996592,0.0001824523,0.001492861,0.00003171364,0.0000670781,1.569939e-8,1.133032e-7,0.000003590616,0.001630202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3468015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766092601","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0028","title":"Thinking like a private lawyer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Relation (database); Tort; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Centrality; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy; Liability; History","authors":[{"name":"Christopher Essert","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0215834691220999,"gpt":0.276891843250878,"spread":0.255308374128778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003486703,0.00003477193,0.00006873216,0.000004227716,0.005144157,0.0001525537,0.0007670113,0.00004079227,0.000835515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001571839,0.00003727581,0.0000681451,0.00000556587,0.0002954232,0.0007559512,0.0001238556,0.00008711915,0.00001287873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001492866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005465037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.159183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.334065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995056,0.00003352964,0.00005342604,0.00006288055,0.0002185894,0.000125953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994509,0.00001406362,0.0001840811,0.0001698174,0.00007931097,0.0001018786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008602111,0.00002352649,0.001711659,0.000001522167,0.00001828428,0.000008934388,0.008950232,0.00000253708,0.00005903827,0.9863088,0.00111225,0.001794674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002026913,0.00001046998,0.009041224,0.00001517718,0.00001422387,0.000001864761,0.003625374,0.000007549653,0.000008752191,0.004421322,0.9825984,0.00005292656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03931186,0.0001090746,0.0007928499,0.003479361,0.0001941981,0.00006257423,0.000004021302,0.00001772734,0.9560283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935752,0.0002781753,0.002436764,0.00005957237,0.0001585434,1.72048e-8,2.243177e-7,0.000002268474,0.003489219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255984055","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3437","title":"The lure and the limits of dialogue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Aileen Kavanagh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0288368252960619,"gpt":0.2436162291613386,"spread":0.2147794038652767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005793226,0.0000229248,0.00006755354,0.000002088242,0.001444878,0.00001197938,0.0001564946,0.00001856051,0.00001906696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008068937,0.0000134813,0.00003748132,0.00001360867,0.002048142,0.0001189905,0.0000358829,0.0000442155,6.953262e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005347528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009554081,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2231966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5488094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995661,0.0001112272,0.00004699225,0.00002625847,0.0001831551,0.00006628351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995598,0.0001223888,0.00007406764,0.0000282537,0.0001666122,0.00004890628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008861291,0.000006621127,0.0006566147,3.451622e-7,0.000033303,0.000001542326,0.01275021,0.000001784867,0.000001458038,0.9829267,0.001643018,0.001889828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001098026,0.00004693635,0.004663474,0.00001716392,0.00005519333,0.000004871226,0.1235391,0.000003579062,0.00000393353,0.05008902,0.8204306,0.00004817191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03258217,0.01118651,0.00009143109,0.01239516,0.0003932473,0.00008882688,0.000005085963,0.000005330729,0.9432523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971254,0.002454695,0.00003673933,0.00002612009,0.0001001573,1.270567e-8,5.824814e-8,4.203527e-7,0.0002564147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9645432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507249553","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4008","title":"The path of the law: Towards legal singularity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Witness; Singularity; Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Tax law; Sociology; Mathematics; Tax reform","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin Alarie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02024037742337321,"gpt":0.2663106734233213,"spread":0.2460702959999481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009247271,0.00005456536,0.0001047379,0.000003772783,0.002371362,0.00003715252,0.0008210036,0.00006511041,0.0006803938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001221827,0.00003023712,0.0001614518,0.00002938446,0.002296994,0.0005261656,0.0001099778,0.00007983422,0.000004769731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003326475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000191692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3342805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6863698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988392,0.0002901809,0.0001394719,0.0000750051,0.000455397,0.0002007205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990917,0.0001480875,0.0002189492,0.0001783316,0.0002801277,0.00008281222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003538172,0.00002664202,0.0003099487,0.000001048085,0.00001973466,0.000003815958,0.005963792,0.000001368255,0.0003900969,0.980821,0.0006837351,0.0117434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001247231,0.00005267633,0.0009731253,0.00005992571,0.00002937038,0.000004465089,0.0225144,0.000003995846,0.001835417,0.01645767,0.9578625,0.00008173136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08896063,0.0004654553,0.002359127,0.01145519,0.001567855,0.0001837887,0.00001927745,0.00002292351,0.8949658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969848,0.0002334871,0.000258631,0.00004448974,0.0001402028,1.555353e-8,3.04882e-8,0.000002690841,0.002335666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783051054","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0080","title":"The origins of gender identity and gender expression in Anglo-American legal discourse","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Human rights; Identity (music); Law; Scholarship; Political science; Sociology; Human sexuality; Gender studies; Parliament; Expression (computer science); Politics","authors":[{"name":"Kyle Kirkup","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0339511753438979,"gpt":0.3530585936606168,"spread":0.3191074183167189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003644269,0.0000806307,0.0001657991,0.00003541166,0.0005020568,0.00002571749,0.0002935315,0.00005462876,0.0006820999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009993561,0.00006820488,0.00006550314,0.00004648557,0.0008691027,0.0005785836,0.0000856273,0.0001630556,0.000007985965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000245696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006979133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2901726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3153653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990565,0.0002124102,0.0001693682,0.0001265227,0.0001969232,0.0002382763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992673,0.00004555577,0.0002550297,0.000197135,0.0001066875,0.0001282281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00113917,0.0006266577,0.4104401,0.0001611602,0.0002740872,0.0001514089,0.03925937,0.000002968093,0.001200437,0.5074908,0.02702184,0.01223198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001536472,0.0002772107,0.9225078,0.00001753326,0.00008415705,0.00009090662,0.01806345,0.000008946182,0.00002713846,0.00186043,0.05537559,0.0001503124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9075573,0.001042366,0.000336259,0.0002849449,0.0005291972,0.00006884053,0.00001340259,0.000005605556,0.09016208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975833,0.0009122831,0.0002576209,0.00004328973,0.000259336,4.580792e-8,5.592034e-7,0.000005712026,0.0009378289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5120677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7468516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124106265","doi":"10.3138/utlj.4005","title":"Law in the future","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin Alarie","is_ca":true},{"name":"Anthony Niblett","is_ca":true},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02069568511437597,"gpt":0.2727627974300204,"spread":0.2520671123156444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007275709,0.00004197748,0.00007319065,0.000007277315,0.0008054491,0.00002401077,0.0005510423,0.00006210016,0.002689563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001727861,0.00002744593,0.00006605286,0.00002977086,0.0006812678,0.0006442227,0.00002522748,0.00008480702,0.00002628331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002598896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004871975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1598708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9049312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991553,0.0002402496,0.00008556914,0.00006567749,0.0002813597,0.0001717816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995666,0.0001139287,0.00007790876,0.00009551217,0.00008438151,0.00006162463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002063324,0.00002558711,0.000346162,5.220144e-7,0.00000472581,0.00002386416,0.02210265,9.429542e-7,0.00006270628,0.9661671,0.001299777,0.00994535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008867915,0.00002804093,0.0003672492,0.0000200827,0.000005833353,0.000004041021,0.08532566,6.392551e-7,0.00004482023,0.008645386,0.9054199,0.00004966828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02900849,0.0004064232,0.0005789986,0.01264293,0.0006171234,0.00009796279,0.000004144183,0.00001424858,0.9566297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998028,0.00046972,0.0002318503,0.0001841568,0.0004074017,1.825083e-8,6.144438e-8,0.000001896532,0.0006768273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025174668","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.091212","title":"OPINION WRITING AND AUTHORSHIP ON THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legal writing; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Style (visual arts); Writing style; Government (linguistics); Political science; Dissenting opinion; Judicial opinion; Staffing; Sociology; Literature; Linguistics; Philosophy; Art; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Kelly Bodwin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeffrey S. Rosenthal","is_ca":false},{"name":"Albert Yoon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02371204143060945,"gpt":0.2274992970317094,"spread":0.2037872556010999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002644458,0.0000270022,0.00006165449,0.00000325253,0.001196915,0.0000103859,0.0001046579,0.00001871744,0.0005349425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003820514,0.0000218319,0.00002101342,0.000011651,0.000356505,0.0001326169,0.00002384737,0.00005534068,5.054221e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001444832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001755109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9875861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995421,0.00006952656,0.00005326905,0.00003438786,0.000212316,0.00008840092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996345,0.00009232546,0.00006814644,0.0000230618,0.0001265316,0.00005545211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001107002,0.00001070315,0.003170647,0.000002039316,0.00002916639,0.000001625766,0.004241616,0.000003294197,0.00002415587,0.9823738,0.009124056,0.001007798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006249165,0.0001690824,0.2101978,0.000253909,0.00004416461,0.000008663398,0.3009421,0.00003719078,0.00006142038,0.04038313,0.4470287,0.0002488728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3399812,0.0007907361,0.000029917,0.01540005,0.0002473475,0.00009649408,0.00000742779,0.000004516507,0.6434423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999448,0.0002457053,0.00003952596,0.00005706478,0.00007480994,1.790222e-8,1.106037e-7,5.475602e-7,0.0001342286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.920582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021608390","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.070812ra","title":"RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND INDIVIDUALITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Individualism; Independence (probability theory); Relational theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Marilyn Friedman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03045350251775319,"gpt":0.2505324012269758,"spread":0.2200788987092226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002558515,0.00004312927,0.00008877904,0.000004512555,0.001497476,0.00003522562,0.0001122491,0.00005063216,0.003094939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003473938,0.00004138701,0.0000436975,0.00001273058,0.0004510586,0.0008946535,0.000056403,0.00008447061,0.00001302207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003985944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005316976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3403237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1160938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994218,0.0001068191,0.00007179347,0.00006428653,0.0002149461,0.0001203751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999532,0.00006357411,0.000098541,0.00003000786,0.0001611788,0.0001146912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001641032,0.00007541967,0.07594545,0.00000967808,0.0002141449,0.000006329321,0.1989515,0.000007797388,0.00005705752,0.7019017,0.008871702,0.01394281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003578115,0.00002182831,0.4760073,0.00001202564,0.0000237225,0.000002280654,0.04875442,0.000008838688,0.000002288091,0.001683309,0.4730328,0.00009335058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5091265,0.0007943762,0.0001344777,0.005789096,0.0001750403,0.0001726539,0.000006364367,0.00002664828,0.4837748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932711,0.000206852,0.003680145,0.00003886652,0.0000876988,4.783565e-8,6.061794e-7,0.000001295411,0.002713429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7002184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233044663","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.41","title":"DEFERENCE, DEFIANCE, AND DOCTRINE: DEFINING THE LIMITS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Statute; Standard of review; Doctrine; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Judicial deference; Substantive due process; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Separation of powers; Legislature; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"T.R.S. Allan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01872079232334788,"gpt":0.2624389055036149,"spread":0.243718113180267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004391979,0.00004480209,0.0001438682,0.000006858697,0.001237353,0.000009329463,0.0002012386,0.00003475386,0.0002962538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009884968,0.00003606804,0.00006198812,0.00004058653,0.001027653,0.0001883683,0.00004425711,0.0001388711,0.000002202662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000281925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001273562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07444991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.479294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994504,0.00005928032,0.0000994486,0.00005812648,0.0002228717,0.0001098833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994655,0.0000892615,0.0001494259,0.00004707207,0.0001892574,0.00005946112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001405114,0.00001328115,0.003395141,0.00001049884,0.00002620708,0.000002783245,0.001163422,2.033409e-7,0.00002855118,0.9865524,0.001012188,0.007781309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004739703,0.00008087798,0.03347731,0.0005958886,0.0002048505,0.00002583553,0.0086556,9.543232e-7,0.00002093556,0.0162518,0.9400543,0.000157709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05079653,0.04011943,0.00004139621,0.002535271,0.0003785087,0.000108079,0.000008869246,0.000008840717,0.9060031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590858,0.04032633,0.0003157629,0.0001088853,0.00009392427,3.766591e-8,2.216599e-7,9.25982e-7,0.000068127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287731110","doi":"10.3138/utlj.102412r","title":"Philosophical Interventions: Reviews 1986–2011","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Craft; Intermediary; Psychological intervention; Sociology; Psychology; History; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Sanford Levinson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06107641061088669,"gpt":0.2334037655490417,"spread":0.172327354938155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001212428,0.00008143722,0.0001752612,0.00001717826,0.0006445012,0.00005917651,0.0002693001,0.00003239735,0.05000426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005026007,0.00007648835,0.0002942012,0.000005437288,0.0003003458,0.0007462202,0.0000458543,0.0001294318,0.000766792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005849435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001000776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008373061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009673121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994215,0.00005696124,0.0002114996,0.00009398682,0.0001020437,0.0001140099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993683,0.00001722887,0.0001979998,0.0001538848,0.0001546121,0.0001080302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006920165,0.0001156607,0.000007811685,0.00002788442,0.00003857935,0.000002690266,0.003386972,3.103143e-7,0.00003909924,0.9679944,0.02515944,0.00322022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003239767,0.0001065416,0.0001321786,0.000136747,0.00006076437,0.00001693403,0.002254945,0.000007878686,0.000007510164,0.06716333,0.92967,0.0001192489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004861674,0.004985182,0.0002323535,0.00828997,0.0003359187,0.0003348662,0.0000276835,0.00003635829,0.980896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893634,0.0008965823,0.0008807923,0.0002089071,0.0007703041,7.131469e-7,0.000005395419,0.000007607906,0.007866244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125541929","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0007","title":"A Network Effects Perspective on Software Piracy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Business; Intellectual property; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Legislature; Software; Computer security; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Ariel Katz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00991715124233946,"gpt":0.1909535129673466,"spread":0.1810363617250071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001403931,0.0001126197,0.0001604051,0.00002905396,0.0006047029,0.0000858411,0.0002670133,0.00004853618,0.007925597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006079929,0.00009884826,0.0001268822,0.00004795905,0.00007307303,0.001668345,0.00009651201,0.0001694255,0.0002481332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003488732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001628189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01767349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02223531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993579,0.00001476286,0.0000909213,0.0001354093,0.0001927239,0.0002083231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994042,0.00004462619,0.0001421004,0.0001110407,0.0002752287,0.00002283203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001332113,0.0004342394,0.0005911634,0.00007529268,0.000229131,0.0001087189,0.002008338,0.0005367364,0.00008918605,0.1822153,0.7648747,0.04750514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001291606,0.0001485157,0.001668339,0.0001637698,0.0000997661,0.00001085834,0.001542351,0.002630128,0.00003519745,0.003438632,0.9887106,0.0002602156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01508752,0.001059306,0.001783723,0.001112459,0.0004593359,0.0001503242,7.464897e-7,0.00007742298,0.9802692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993239,0.00004474739,0.001195571,0.001457838,0.002263603,4.295933e-8,0.000001092064,0.0000109564,0.001787077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004751260","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2505","title":"The role of reparative justice in responding to the legacy of Indian Residential Schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Settlement (finance); Wrongdoing; Plaintiff; Commission; Political science; Order (exchange); Compensation (psychology); Law; Payment; Value (mathematics); Business; Finance; Psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Mayo Moran","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01003939497198805,"gpt":0.2619166616636476,"spread":0.2518772666916596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00107694,0.00003427731,0.0001017456,0.00002792605,0.001384818,0.0000201521,0.0003290422,0.00002625099,0.00004575351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003190282,0.00002514192,0.00005338973,0.0001026723,0.0004486548,0.0002980698,0.00005698833,0.00009286783,0.000001926517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001487395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001399159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2712522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6870374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991514,0.0002795908,0.0001217373,0.00005266082,0.0002824136,0.000112181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993495,0.0002023589,0.0001622225,0.00006124151,0.0001800445,0.00004465805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002535067,0.00001693848,0.001832377,0.000001674047,0.00003463208,0.000002561911,0.0349539,0.00007585966,0.0001847537,0.959861,0.0005038053,0.002278956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004301462,0.0001552833,0.02934051,0.0001432042,0.00007197529,0.000002401686,0.5321781,0.000008204067,0.0003653339,0.02095195,0.4162606,0.00009223299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3846732,0.001264766,0.0001263211,0.004063712,0.0003429723,0.0001595238,0.000005667105,0.000004221438,0.6093596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993153,0.0002236493,0.00008669146,0.00001729655,0.0001381665,4.540634e-8,6.719695e-8,7.850566e-7,0.0002179678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784246330","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0073","title":"Gender identity, gender pronouns, and freedom of expression: Bill C-16 and the traction of specious legal claims","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Law; Political science; Politics; Legislature; Human rights; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Binary opposition; Freedom of expression; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Brenda Cossman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01204984575812998,"gpt":0.2087044058289138,"spread":0.1966545600707839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003700322,0.00006621439,0.0001448563,0.00002699898,0.0003126725,0.00004555561,0.0002882046,0.00005223549,0.0001051629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006519576,0.00004698649,0.00005905089,0.00003373674,0.0004242402,0.001358129,0.0001428008,0.0001017205,7.658522e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005613718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000335404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009040934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006752939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992906,0.00009564148,0.0001404199,0.0001243637,0.0002493224,0.00009968758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993157,0.00002798352,0.0002496241,0.0001616828,0.0001807327,0.00006427892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004580035,0.001051334,0.006944127,0.0003856603,0.001103735,0.0001570458,0.0707036,0.0001363843,0.1347309,0.6599151,0.01147172,0.1088203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06495672,0.007937754,0.2690329,0.001125568,0.00138898,0.009125821,0.06635905,0.02214744,0.1883711,0.1452767,0.2213432,0.002934761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.664889,0.001942773,0.2866831,0.0004645365,0.001219456,0.0003950354,0.000006562158,0.00003577002,0.04436379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940624,0.0003621953,0.005316037,0.00001119059,0.0001061196,3.417255e-8,1.504878e-7,0.000002460206,0.0001394692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5146384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}