{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"af7fe9944b6f","filters":{"venue":"Vanderbilt journal of transnational law"}},"results":[{"id":"W2887933962","doi":"","title":"Harmonizing the Battle of the Forms: A Comparison of the United States, Canada, and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt journal of transnational law","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":367,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Convention; Political science; International trade; Law; Business; History; Ancient history","authors":[{"name":"Charles Sukurs","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05792357910597128,"gpt":0.3101430257183457,"spread":0.2522194466123744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00165273,0.00008847692,0.0001673682,0.0001265364,0.0006053408,0.00005027391,0.0007739582,0.00003505499,0.00004254151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006627227,0.00003728155,0.000192054,0.0005249944,0.000759679,0.0001506903,0.00002297057,0.0002423115,6.216037e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008561081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003520159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02467224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2205198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978499,0.0003243023,0.0006201496,0.00007013695,0.001018976,0.0001165276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930453,0.004916387,0.0008170514,0.0001207996,0.001068231,0.00003224364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002627262,0.00009303613,0.0009073447,0.000006760695,0.000209474,1.848383e-7,0.001475354,0.005937284,0.0001918692,0.990359,0.0004780535,0.0000788956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00501469,0.0001454073,0.03300763,0.0001953547,0.0002829381,0.00001442949,0.004892732,0.01449588,0.003160728,0.01539054,0.9232646,0.0001351129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7428218,0.0005225629,0.00284539,0.2297037,0.002148495,0.001182429,0.0003732257,0.000007400989,0.02039502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984185,0.0002012917,0.00002835906,0.0009260958,0.00008296054,0.000005162996,0.00001473727,0.000007465929,0.0003154266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890681678","doi":"","title":"The \"Privilege of Speech\" in a \"Pleasantly Authoritarian Country\": How Canada's Judiciary Allowed Laws Proscribing Discourse Critical of Homosexuality to Trump Free Speech and Religious Liberty","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt journal of transnational law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Homosexuality; Free speech; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Hans C. Clausen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01557191794395333,"gpt":0.2878414657553534,"spread":0.2722695478114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002180423,0.0001541785,0.0004131281,0.000089652,0.0004092212,0.00008418543,0.0005443419,0.0001224064,0.00002205468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004932014,0.0001103131,0.0001032037,0.000283913,0.00390177,0.0004089782,0.00002893112,0.0003079484,1.020344e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002142045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001269087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04252362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8652056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969754,0.0002933473,0.0007425884,0.0001930306,0.001425881,0.0003697537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979094,0.0009133277,0.0002444498,0.000189672,0.0004870949,0.0002560133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001461142,0.0001598164,0.001125821,0.00002623543,0.00005056383,0.00003985959,0.002889323,0.00003642619,0.0003488663,0.9926439,0.001531254,0.001001852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008156437,0.001047388,0.02239006,0.0005963265,0.0004374079,0.0002665646,0.01601251,0.0005163619,0.004182939,0.7010388,0.2441169,0.001238207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.415593,0.0019001,0.005089159,0.5676301,0.001421117,0.0009432851,0.0005045154,0.00002249178,0.006896295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971143,0.0001187829,0.002005345,0.0002789811,0.000381919,0.000002893372,0.000003212004,0.00001268132,0.00008187691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.822682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898378225","doi":"","title":"The Legal and Social Implications of Insolvent Cross-Border Real Estate Developers: Reviewing the U.S. and Canadian Commercial Real Estate Markets","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt journal of transnational law","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate; Insolvency; Estate; Business; Real estate investment trust; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Edward T. Canuel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02207792692521149,"gpt":0.3039386367490803,"spread":0.2818607098238688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00167612,0.0001254828,0.0001822485,0.00008159906,0.0009430752,0.0002516333,0.0002017594,0.00004907005,0.00001813793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003493469,0.00008197654,0.00007957638,0.0002154278,0.0003118853,0.0007540591,0.0000271998,0.000211063,3.661647e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005689626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002184693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01510338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2700928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987476,0.00002363558,0.0005782581,0.0001147932,0.0003058847,0.0002297824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986491,0.0002222506,0.000483367,0.00007994989,0.0005340564,0.00003126782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003311347,0.00006139311,0.02907155,0.0001475182,0.0001311848,0.00002185727,0.0007893107,0.00004092188,0.0002157474,0.7898719,0.0005810462,0.1787364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004673096,0.000009947086,0.6184641,0.0000246178,0.00004843351,0.00003105798,0.0001361651,0.00003342862,0.00001433067,0.001938044,0.3787363,0.00009627637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9120208,0.0002413896,0.0003293402,0.04313729,0.0002999757,0.0002588352,0.00003910435,0.000008204508,0.04366507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965925,0.002225796,0.0001334119,0.0007149134,0.0002730814,0.000002690474,0.000009016005,0.00001195424,0.00003665797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7879339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}