{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":38,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"c79d541ba869","filters":{"venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2210338013","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5228","title":"Why Legal History Matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Project commissioning; Publishing; Law; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jim Phillips","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0128029408878248,"gpt":0.2298284229361456,"spread":0.2170254820483208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004841753,0.00008951921,0.000230585,0.000003863469,0.0003513133,0.000009088129,0.0004396217,0.000146668,0.00433832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001973403,0.00009585079,0.0002113857,0.0001301438,0.0006655907,0.0002450643,0.0000323682,0.0002631648,0.00009647233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001213393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001204019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006809437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991309,0.000111694,0.0001144034,0.0001712409,0.0002920287,0.0001797494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993593,0.00004410513,0.0001379131,0.0002058595,0.0001336932,0.0001191984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003231071,0.00002735842,0.00001836342,0.0002970238,0.00001753465,0.000003478086,0.002577592,2.267566e-7,0.0002539351,0.549311,0.4473267,0.0001635062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009651593,0.00000819263,0.00000292839,0.0002754874,0.00006865134,5.338579e-7,0.0003706121,4.748526e-7,0.00001808356,0.0002166363,0.9988273,0.0001146297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00370387,0.05657975,0.0001798197,0.07842842,0.01093093,0.001033251,0.00002485685,0.0003768075,0.8487423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05513484,0.7410831,0.00959972,0.1069349,0.003835279,0.000002223727,0.00007212965,0.00008471839,0.08325303],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7654893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213989475","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5214","title":"Informal Land Titles: Snowden v Baker (1844)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Statutory law; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); High Court; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Bruce Kercher","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01440615935590859,"gpt":0.2608198726124173,"spread":0.2464137132565088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003588086,0.00005914694,0.000150787,0.00001569126,0.0003218262,0.00001502025,0.0003122278,0.00007321983,0.001683286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002365048,0.00006041367,0.00008274555,0.0001650004,0.0002096163,0.0001756007,0.00004599394,0.0001466979,0.0003631659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001488182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009090237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006607559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01150164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994429,0.00002969734,0.0001099384,0.0001028234,0.0001811475,0.0001335434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994661,0.00004327118,0.00009976909,0.0001884288,0.0001057273,0.0000967178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003512718,0.00003084518,0.0007547886,0.0002390797,0.00001413031,0.000001159672,0.001115351,0.000001312624,0.00007747185,0.9919829,0.00420078,0.001578626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008646957,0.000006230582,0.0001118313,0.0001354239,0.00003243621,2.382858e-7,0.00007514741,0.000005150633,0.00001826979,0.000183419,0.9992718,0.00007363869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02058068,0.001771531,0.0002623799,0.003608467,0.000697387,0.0005470316,0.00003191751,0.0001010075,0.9723996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9000327,0.07521946,0.003403252,0.001078681,0.001067498,0.000001457964,0.00004637154,0.00002200134,0.01912857],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550297742","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5383","title":"Legal Pluralism, Customary Law and Human Rights in Francophone African Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"French; Human rights; Charter; Political science; Legal pluralism; Colonialism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Comparative law; Geography; Legal realism; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jacques Frémont","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00787781370084571,"gpt":0.23692712362303,"spread":0.2290493099221843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005490446,0.0001456389,0.0004658911,0.00005281219,0.001381037,0.00003391676,0.0003063196,0.0001209793,0.0003950995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003005308,0.0001367671,0.00009130719,0.0003315127,0.0006574917,0.0003436082,0.00002267098,0.0001530995,0.00002248688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001177756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009244929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2437021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3284323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987011,0.0001843458,0.000228878,0.0002467556,0.0003233041,0.0003155958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993556,0.00005932663,0.0001633474,0.0001881572,0.000109407,0.0001241636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001378394,0.00005218331,0.00004048777,0.0001486532,0.000009512301,0.00003107191,0.006314136,6.397544e-7,0.00001048122,0.992807,0.0005100155,0.00006203532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002857334,0.00007191444,0.0001136372,0.0007033771,0.00003580898,9.96346e-7,0.000266802,4.748065e-7,0.00002917115,0.002581534,0.9957284,0.0001821763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1479195,0.01468365,0.00001627461,0.003711601,0.000742653,0.001165273,0.00003686676,0.0001488202,0.8315754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872627,0.01091252,0.0001095612,0.0006315541,0.000183511,1.761038e-7,0.000009560826,0.000004957267,0.0008854393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123738432","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i4.5334","title":"International Law and the Practice of Legality: Stability and Change","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; International law; Political science; Sources of international law; Municipal law; Statute; Public law; Public international law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jutta Brunnée","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stephen J. Toope","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03258657486503207,"gpt":0.2930863240080652,"spread":0.2604997491430331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012767,0.0000492131,0.0001653983,0.0000111792,0.0003187936,0.00001512148,0.0002030463,0.00003394827,0.0004099473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007063777,0.00003877364,0.00004464861,0.00003702998,0.001987166,0.0003331324,0.00005801116,0.00005612773,0.000004624975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002656756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002347814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02241935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00594509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991904,0.0002509334,0.0001217802,0.0001162657,0.0002540279,0.00006662496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989761,0.0002643942,0.00018513,0.0001000524,0.0004390272,0.00003526794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053109,0.00001984466,0.00002080935,0.0001108805,0.00002894905,4.183959e-7,0.003953256,4.023164e-9,0.000002911219,0.9956722,0.00003761264,0.0001000081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002640997,0.00002306196,0.00002612534,0.000260291,0.000069958,5.503493e-7,0.0001462389,0.000004182508,0.00003281163,0.01407912,0.9850515,0.00004204794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02594304,0.00479598,0.00009180538,0.01717305,0.0009299338,0.0007477656,0.00003714573,0.000024698,0.9502566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832107,0.01503533,0.0002708428,0.0008172778,0.0003103506,2.895694e-7,0.000002714646,0.000002376838,0.0003501261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976893161","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5518","title":"Deliberation and Legitimacy in Transnational Governance: The Case of Environmental Impact Assessments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Legitimacy; Environmental governance; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Transnational governance; Criticism; Corporate governance; Harm; Democratic legitimacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Economics; Management; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Neil Craik","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009568564324980777,"gpt":0.2713858767380855,"spread":0.2618173124131047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004845384,0.0001039596,0.0001916933,0.00001097121,0.000107562,0.000004563345,0.0001257725,0.00004494091,0.001145634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002643462,0.00008900061,0.00007841954,0.0001144602,0.0003002093,0.0002951189,0.00006061781,0.00009701075,0.000005772496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002644359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008236521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001468766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009812219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992009,0.00006658791,0.0002153886,0.0001504793,0.0002286847,0.0001379195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999577,0.00006948392,0.000177157,0.0001126086,0.000002845732,0.00006093072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006320401,0.003798267,0.6258272,0.001848753,0.0004902421,0.001185683,0.007658714,0.001704434,0.04989589,0.1314431,0.001056882,0.1744588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002526801,0.0004501487,0.9413149,0.0005721413,0.0002766984,0.0001610019,0.0007987317,0.0005331413,0.001371274,0.001185132,0.05023113,0.0005789199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946091,0.0009332825,0.0003508893,0.0001850807,0.00005192773,0.0003441214,0.00005220299,0.000003888818,0.003469492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938922,0.005566307,0.0003908667,0.00007281468,0.000009766679,2.201457e-7,0.00001120348,0.000005146956,0.00005148759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3154877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976173574","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v37i4.5583","title":"Recognising Multi-textualism: Rethinking New Zealand's Legal History","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty of Waitangi; Treaty; Project commissioning; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Publishing; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Richard Boast","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04323443744467582,"gpt":0.2723561829921062,"spread":0.2291217455474304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008563696,0.0001842472,0.000570121,0.00003150698,0.0004646937,0.00002159967,0.000478672,0.0001642018,0.001960474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001247007,0.0001883011,0.0002641448,0.0002044738,0.0003253898,0.0004610225,0.0001017865,0.0002721671,0.0003408472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007772322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002279277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09091102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008765435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982045,0.0003347912,0.0002699519,0.0003504253,0.0005001141,0.0003402261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988058,0.0001813346,0.000356813,0.0002291252,0.0002413464,0.0001855505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000177013,0.0003882328,0.006009545,0.004913277,0.0007602472,0.00007325755,0.2663532,0.00003838651,0.001407599,0.4394139,0.2602692,0.02019607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004121826,0.00002622711,0.00006789368,0.001846685,0.0001205345,5.118919e-7,0.0009679237,0.000006386892,0.00001632968,0.00009765787,0.9961994,0.0002382974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1104725,0.3879141,0.0007991771,0.03718949,0.02142102,0.007620979,0.00004787615,0.00157287,0.432962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2406249,0.4444729,0.02283972,0.003449622,0.002089728,0.000001411304,0.00006460947,0.00009901845,0.286358],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7359301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219607269","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v39i2.5464","title":"Freedom of Expression, Commercial Expression and Tobacco in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Supreme court; Freedom of expression; Law; Flexibility (engineering); Value (mathematics); Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Economics; Computer science; Management; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Caroline Reid","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01124954062760652,"gpt":0.1883194282826774,"spread":0.1770698876550709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001488959,0.00008985188,0.0003012648,0.00004011087,0.0001029923,0.00000305171,0.0003787532,0.00004259543,0.00002865411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000128022,0.00009208778,0.00004235918,0.0002380739,0.00006438563,0.000199703,0.0001295444,0.00009896729,0.000001824002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000693572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002200419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4384206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2108744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991664,0.00009169178,0.0001993706,0.0001965504,0.0002216195,0.0001243184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993438,0.0000539925,0.0001680187,0.0002825282,0.00007744753,0.00007426034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001018464,0.002126347,0.2223912,0.02424638,0.0003192088,0.001979728,0.01743517,0.002186831,0.2122454,0.1914348,0.1262212,0.1983953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00214813,0.0002183175,0.007906682,0.01176759,0.00004726707,0.00004400178,0.0001511321,0.0006878187,0.06603742,0.0002538007,0.9100183,0.0007195999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481004,0.0237473,0.02008501,0.0007218234,0.001499493,0.0007808441,0.0000185833,0.00008020262,0.004966322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637925,0.02841274,0.007628008,0.00008855531,0.0000308624,2.268419e-7,0.000002529993,0.000004753498,0.00003981229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7837971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8035251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218652726","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i2.5264","title":"Immigration Bill 2007: Special Advocates and the Right to be Heard","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mirroring; Immigration; Appeal; Political science; Law; Bill of rights; Human rights; Subject (documents); Immigration law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Lani Inverarity","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01922557278183171,"gpt":0.2581632762789021,"spread":0.2389377034970704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009070108,0.00006964348,0.0001862816,0.00002508241,0.000476467,0.00002391284,0.0001910776,0.00003553541,0.0003035243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007831159,0.00004974751,0.00006235406,0.0001977326,0.0002122256,0.0001883477,0.00002508356,0.00007989755,0.00006732937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003181204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003244047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003655875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00180355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991386,0.0002698312,0.0001224969,0.0001521848,0.0001998567,0.0001170358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995017,0.00008665893,0.00009440575,0.0001384095,0.0001026211,0.00007621268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004885032,0.00008106051,0.00001085527,0.0004999316,0.00003025658,0.00001155267,0.01514704,0.000006038244,0.0000914281,0.8863317,0.06589641,0.03140522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000186189,0.00006681194,0.00001690895,0.0003128809,0.0001253524,5.220917e-7,0.000844311,0.000003220901,0.00003829848,0.0005606861,0.9977745,0.0000703326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01706781,0.04930173,0.00669794,0.3547755,0.00442927,0.005974466,0.00008505095,0.0003169796,0.5613513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1769062,0.7935197,0.002876166,0.01457265,0.007325054,0.00000115591,0.00005717832,0.00002328929,0.004718611],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9318781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5526614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372080422","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i3-4.5810","title":"Protecting Rights in Common Law Constitutional Systems; a Framework for a Comparative Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Common law; Constitution; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Legislature; Human rights; Constitutional review; Fundamental rights; Comparative law; Politics; Democracy; Sovereignty","authors":[{"name":"Cheryl Saunders","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0721219157603624,"gpt":0.314255935206012,"spread":0.2421340194456496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006911731,0.0001053486,0.0004934245,0.00003067683,0.001444049,0.00001577014,0.0002084829,0.00006764848,0.00008297005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003700766,0.000106946,0.00009601277,0.0003085718,0.001225924,0.0001359948,0.00003348544,0.0001664548,0.00002455469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001378644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004789405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03825893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02881581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987438,0.0003404195,0.0002421739,0.0002001561,0.0002895208,0.0001839789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990357,0.000432383,0.0001866453,0.00009177137,0.0001966655,0.00005682091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001556313,0.0001986796,0.0003573972,0.0001595609,0.00004670483,0.000004636664,0.003701943,0.00002307531,4.998919e-7,0.995362,0.0001066839,0.0000231955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004635605,0.0001060839,0.00002236718,0.003276638,0.0001047129,6.237515e-7,0.003699936,0.00003696823,0.000002223287,0.03597458,0.9561329,0.0001793848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06313842,0.1047765,0.01233265,0.004186918,0.00388686,0.02204264,0.0002066157,0.0003497929,0.7890796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978145,0.001544569,0.0003978083,0.00005324647,0.0001330721,0.00000771417,0.00000197807,0.000001424476,0.00004573196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308837678","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5386","title":"A Pacific Human Rights Mechanism: Specific Challenges and Requirements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Island Health","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Human rights; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Project commissioning; Key (lock); Political science; Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Business; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Social science; Computer security; Finance; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Kathryn Hay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03629845025561608,"gpt":0.2645375673411293,"spread":0.2282391170855133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005740531,0.00012101,0.0003588218,0.00003108997,0.001023171,0.00001155836,0.0002009888,0.00007780454,0.0001618768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003667855,0.0001185613,0.00009481087,0.0001148683,0.0002102754,0.0001264488,0.00002595631,0.00008005968,0.00001937962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004329217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001212868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005020213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001170985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998936,0.0001505773,0.0001592415,0.0002487142,0.0002824517,0.0002230232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994586,0.00003344818,0.0001390999,0.0001805681,0.00009109997,0.00009723903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065133,0.00003516765,0.000003442313,0.0001515747,0.0000189752,0.000007113008,0.005565896,2.703329e-8,0.0000173589,0.9905106,0.001254372,0.002428967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001929725,0.00009728513,0.00002091766,0.0007420143,0.00004753353,4.089569e-7,0.002601519,3.421787e-7,0.00001014373,0.02127931,0.9748707,0.0001368108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001850893,0.09793541,0.00008295769,0.003220649,0.0004846738,0.0005474773,0.000007529407,0.00008181758,0.8957886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5626196,0.4360328,0.0001953725,0.00002865309,0.000134517,1.198609e-7,0.000003518357,0.000003353495,0.0009820986],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7869508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158256369","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5521","title":"The Democratic Challenge of Incorporation: International Human Rights Treaties and National Constitutions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Treaty; Political science; Democracy; Law; State (computer science); International community; International human rights law; Supreme court; Economic Justice","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Harrington","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0218276695956688,"gpt":0.2848495493933192,"spread":0.2630218797976504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008839082,0.00005305275,0.0001147505,0.00003631174,0.0009300396,0.00001150266,0.0001807567,0.00004246894,0.00008123089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004025511,0.00004685855,0.00005298764,0.0000962678,0.0006187639,0.0001897315,0.0000205879,0.00005061046,0.000004047289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008291203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000738681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002634394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01931775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991682,0.00007006342,0.0002032635,0.00008794936,0.0003979208,0.00007263367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989097,0.0002106592,0.0002517632,0.00005592356,0.0005373482,0.0000346699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006150996,0.00002534546,0.0001646465,0.00004177076,0.0000267227,5.990236e-7,0.0003626686,0.000001933109,0.00001258452,0.9988657,0.0002680103,0.0002238189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001605703,0.00002328919,0.0001781044,0.0003487223,0.00003396353,4.697467e-7,0.000131679,0.00001144751,0.00005256533,0.0649818,0.9340185,0.00005889681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009706049,0.004220848,0.002334736,0.007198674,0.0009544636,0.0005375048,0.00003877981,0.00003852037,0.9749704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900831,0.008203283,0.0003018218,0.00003465424,0.0001633272,2.59094e-7,0.00002425438,0.000001801533,0.001187503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231547810","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i1.5412","title":"The State of Judicial Scrutiny of Public Contracting in New Zealand and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Procurement; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Public administration; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Public law; Government procurement; Law and economics; Business; Economics","authors":[{"name":"David Mullan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02330331090424894,"gpt":0.2576232751249873,"spread":0.2343199642207383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008537328,0.00003900703,0.0001732245,0.00001059285,0.0001682822,0.000004929454,0.0001579073,0.0000194804,0.0000198443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007469569,0.00003465468,0.00002737322,0.0001498317,0.0001644223,0.0001119289,0.00002993342,0.00006198746,4.167474e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004667517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004662203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9240559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9224454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993688,0.0001027632,0.0001632677,0.00005712496,0.0001626376,0.0001454284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992845,0.000220841,0.0002428793,0.00008478793,0.00007840397,0.0000885956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001910395,0.00007506872,0.03860036,0.0004634686,0.00005087489,6.815923e-7,0.005422699,0.000005001037,0.0001196499,0.9303828,0.003246716,0.02161361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001062949,0.000004714106,0.001347314,0.000200483,0.00001939565,6.906883e-8,0.0003230882,0.000002017445,0.00003235745,0.0002353147,0.9976939,0.00003506391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8609754,0.06090115,0.0001515595,0.02440058,0.0007681703,0.001511353,0.00007536534,0.00002374621,0.05119262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640924,0.03540939,0.00006300073,0.00003587517,0.00005152762,6.892052e-8,0.000001036869,0.000001930761,0.0003448171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1413177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952609420","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i4.5023","title":"The Shafts of Strife and War: A Critical Analysis of the Immigration (Mass Arrivals) Amendment Bill","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Immigration; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Immigration law; Geography; Politics","authors":[{"name":"C. H. FOULKES","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01621536091571139,"gpt":0.2825750342800575,"spread":0.2663596733643461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00116383,0.00007038455,0.000275989,0.00004087506,0.0003737863,0.000007664009,0.0002130585,0.00005843231,0.0001058735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002071282,0.00004208143,0.0001979334,0.0005562945,0.0004372806,0.0002022008,0.00002122786,0.00006157143,0.000001305407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004872536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005667406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004556819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007628999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.0003770275,0.0002598823,0.00009960034,0.0003591348,0.0001271211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988645,0.0002571238,0.0002814686,0.0001983515,0.0003377328,0.00006083876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002598094,0.0001193117,0.006819903,0.0004434491,0.0003507588,8.30873e-8,0.01609193,0.00001422115,0.001532927,0.9717275,0.001309592,0.001564377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001375665,0.00005890367,0.001836029,0.0006408765,0.002088334,1.042181e-7,0.004148596,0.0002309313,0.001638432,0.0009240286,0.9881649,0.000131293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7635484,0.177777,0.01146687,0.02160397,0.002900393,0.003341485,0.000246838,0.00008529549,0.01902975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9199535,0.07965437,0.0001372693,0.00005039155,0.00005493308,3.606542e-7,0.000006111086,0.000002273452,0.0001407323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6888577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005497808","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5939","title":"\"We are all Here to Stay\"; Addressing Aboriginal Title Claims after Delgamuukw v British Columbia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Media studies; Library science; Management; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Rachel A Yurkowski","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0174499600638087,"gpt":0.2701826070240427,"spread":0.252732646960234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001814811,0.00006251488,0.0002023138,0.000001780707,0.0002989837,0.00007152367,0.0002351154,0.0001091774,0.02342793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003819146,0.00009160056,0.0001247818,0.0001956377,0.0001520414,0.0001211483,0.00001360387,0.0001118646,0.0005370614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008429253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007214904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01211531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04919878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992189,0.00008564359,0.00009819893,0.0001739303,0.0002436354,0.0001796613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999581,0.0000170772,0.00006186598,0.0001276757,0.00008944728,0.0001229771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000254018,0.0001375927,0.0009065109,0.001441396,0.0001022596,0.00009783389,0.007356354,0.000005704419,0.000005688069,0.008789971,0.9422082,0.0389231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007549363,0.00001023562,0.00003613071,0.001859329,0.00005585986,7.757542e-7,0.000381986,5.381885e-7,7.544455e-7,0.0001905272,0.9972721,0.0001162383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04183754,0.1136135,0.00003784535,0.004952336,0.001294542,0.0008365667,0.0001959912,0.0002651121,0.8369666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03535024,0.7083205,0.002650075,0.003454139,0.0009137708,0.000002046388,0.00002411122,0.000030828,0.2492543],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.594707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949360093","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v46i3.4898","title":"The Crown's Relationship with Tribal Peoples and the Legal Dynamics for the Resolution of Historical and Contemporary Claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Legalism (Western philosophy); Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Ceremony; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"PG McHugh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01895321507556511,"gpt":0.2148043660116618,"spread":0.1958511509360967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008471021,0.0000652698,0.0001555575,0.000005393066,0.0002912812,0.00001174142,0.0002035284,0.00003147851,0.000008250189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009954083,0.00003477081,0.00004292897,0.00007666158,0.0007436398,0.0001270077,0.00007727909,0.00007694258,0.000001513378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001694491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002627988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004451773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003056815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993514,0.000123194,0.0001373207,0.0001092969,0.0002114518,0.00006735822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985883,0.001010987,0.0001720623,0.0001441276,0.00005222099,0.00003235685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006789478,0.0000210175,0.005500754,0.0001497129,0.00003535296,7.902325e-7,0.0004191232,0.00007844345,0.000002295675,0.9890527,0.003716059,0.0003448474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001028335,0.0001167913,0.001995931,0.0002450769,0.0001307289,0.000005880418,0.000230678,0.002731292,0.000004696869,0.002887245,0.9905474,0.00007595504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.228966,0.3819724,0.05003275,0.1818378,0.002652768,0.01269848,0.0002621257,0.0001736361,0.141404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922334,0.005925512,0.0005108681,0.0000561896,0.00002838556,0.000001383861,0.00000615669,0.000004835244,0.001233286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6729779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124426488","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i1.5588","title":"The Needs of the Many and the Needs of the Few: A New System of Public Interest Intervention for New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Adversarial system; Intervention (counseling); Public interest; Order (exchange); Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Fair dealing; Balance (ability); Public relations; Business; Sociology; Legislature; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Edward E. Clark","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02554518457729594,"gpt":0.2556189662009864,"spread":0.2300737816236905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001716986,0.00008833768,0.0003211786,0.00003466029,0.0003942611,0.00002281986,0.0006712769,0.00006614459,0.00002983725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008206542,0.0000465028,0.0003823505,0.000446989,0.0005968678,0.0001266821,0.0001199879,0.00009371472,6.938331e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005654225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001247963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009075745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008521799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988142,0.0003830061,0.0003573344,0.00007306322,0.0002407331,0.0001316585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984385,0.0002849009,0.0007119335,0.0003111884,0.0001985099,0.00005499254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009017532,0.00003673194,0.0006232659,0.0009252766,0.0001161373,2.355506e-8,0.01119454,0.000002454889,0.00004088502,0.9662878,0.003046679,0.01763601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007912734,0.00004545467,0.0001934314,0.002241055,0.0002501729,5.308219e-7,0.003949781,0.0000340621,0.00009237848,0.0003451348,0.9920086,0.00004812068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4840534,0.1744751,0.006460746,0.2700931,0.007222361,0.01228523,0.0001256924,0.0001421311,0.04514225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771081,0.01845478,0.00002737464,0.00004470636,0.0001859319,5.412559e-7,9.144525e-7,0.000005331861,0.004172316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414343126","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i2.5845","title":"The Patentability of Human Beings: The Effect of a Proposed Exclusion in the Patents Act 1953","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Project commissioning; Patent law; Publishing; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Economics; Intellectual property","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra MacBean","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05150712075956262,"gpt":0.2169979599029825,"spread":0.1654908391434199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001941075,0.0001535203,0.0003774097,0.00004009415,0.0004509636,0.0000224862,0.0008412006,0.0000568274,0.0002903566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001155268,0.00007324306,0.0002214706,0.0004667749,0.0002883793,0.0002175986,0.0001779929,0.0001917954,0.00003894151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002252758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005029204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003451974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003292268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986379,0.0002711105,0.0003672216,0.0001759898,0.0003700974,0.0001776552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986652,0.0002868279,0.0004663153,0.0004196625,0.0001548239,0.000007187836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006360318,0.006857204,0.304311,0.202584,0.002265814,0.0001342181,0.03403171,0.0003629013,0.0249704,0.1767516,0.03952938,0.2018415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003180758,0.0008459128,0.003834474,0.01118189,0.001189852,0.000002522761,0.0008650718,0.002239106,0.003629331,0.001276499,0.9711397,0.0006149061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682763,0.007184916,0.00001528648,0.001217577,0.0004002858,0.002351756,0.00000446355,0.00002579179,0.02052367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941047,0.005578804,0.000003085549,0.0001613088,0.00006519292,8.096126e-7,0.000006656708,0.000007630669,0.00007178772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5218375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387652472","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v54i1.8446","title":"The Criminal Law, the Intelligence and Security Act and the Protective Security Requirements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Parliament; Criminal law; Statute; Political science; Criminal code; Common law; Legislature; Legislative history; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Geoffrey Palmer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":0,"score":{"opus":0.04387486937391837,"gpt":0.2984201245111002,"spread":0.2545452551371818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003684449,0.0001020676,0.0001808433,0.00001407424,0.002505769,0.00007480188,0.0004614008,0.00004448381,0.00001965202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002677527,0.00005977733,0.00006681808,0.0003092737,0.00201366,0.0002383534,0.0001825807,0.0002496529,0.00002643686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003570282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004295478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009692932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005892699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981328,0.0009717802,0.0001594795,0.0002153665,0.0003222092,0.0001983806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987329,0.0006245992,0.0001826136,0.0002586309,0.0001413337,0.00005989645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001349992,0.00001469478,0.00001540644,0.0008070416,0.00003808656,0.000004633292,0.02686155,7.591458e-7,0.000004753932,0.9659784,0.0004137172,0.005725907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001781269,0.00006511666,0.00003707338,0.000701579,0.0003579369,0.000002037463,0.01845518,0.00007565923,0.00004058952,0.01726368,0.9627115,0.000111544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2030252,0.2321476,0.005590879,0.1511572,0.006929051,0.03170282,0.000283941,0.00132419,0.3678392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.746575,0.2527804,0.00002119069,0.0003313796,0.0001632665,0.000002918307,0.000003454626,0.000007151818,0.0001152341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9622977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044136967","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i1.5855","title":"Recent Developments in the Law of Equitable Remedies: What Canada Can Do For You","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Supreme court; Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeff Berryman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04301465892440598,"gpt":0.265935077593592,"spread":0.222920418669186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006847754,0.00006298594,0.000200611,0.00001134256,0.0003562931,0.00001643796,0.0004435263,0.00003543463,0.0001603035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003215165,0.00005642475,0.00004667786,0.000291087,0.0001369756,0.0001414841,0.00003688449,0.00006019132,0.00000233765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001910042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002072902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4836269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8609133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999135,0.00008217799,0.0001835844,0.000126988,0.0002791407,0.0001931375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993489,0.000124062,0.0001527967,0.0001690166,0.0001552522,0.0000499981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004268765,0.00006211484,0.00006641506,0.0005156253,0.00002044766,0.000001138362,0.008253047,0.000008406113,0.000005631973,0.9787446,0.00693279,0.005385498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001204539,0.00000874434,0.000005638919,0.0006337753,0.00002657384,6.939204e-8,0.0033591,0.00000328349,0.00002159194,0.0002502038,0.9955078,0.00006281068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01586325,0.2435283,0.0002320256,0.1144807,0.00275993,0.00797418,0.0002935007,0.00007570089,0.6147924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3407149,0.65585,0.0008840645,0.001379815,0.00007736598,0.000004140852,0.00001647437,0.000007662023,0.00106561],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5198117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141257998","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5516","title":"Democratising or Demonising the World Heritage Convention?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Treaty; Political science; Legitimacy; Democratic legitimacy; Democracy; Sovereignty; Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Affolder","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0668074836086298,"gpt":0.2505777495386732,"spread":0.1837702659300434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006301558,0.0001035442,0.0001963534,0.00003284107,0.0006281098,0.0000615207,0.0002398419,0.00002021985,0.0042382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000100838,0.00007354599,0.0001182604,0.0001249961,0.0001858096,0.0003345087,0.00005461319,0.00009853224,0.00005016513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002961426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008423171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006685701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02632058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992589,0.00006325387,0.0002199714,0.0001320717,0.000177289,0.0001484738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999356,0.0001257542,0.0001861033,0.0001772502,0.0001210776,0.00003377144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004972974,0.00002733342,0.00009103983,0.001073746,0.00005720322,0.00001174675,0.002510903,0.00000176955,0.00002991019,0.9829269,0.009318445,0.003901257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001472924,0.00002261079,0.00003364767,0.001166108,0.0001209582,5.075884e-7,0.0009632297,0.00002080214,0.00003292642,0.0006235992,0.9967635,0.0001048778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01100204,0.01973648,0.001947041,0.004828757,0.002117886,0.001430804,0.00001590013,0.0002159411,0.9587051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7499659,0.01841968,0.001810191,0.002720036,0.001531243,7.816368e-7,0.0000978409,0.00004319759,0.2254111],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910877383","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i3.5327","title":"Litigating Climate Change – Of Politics and Political Questions: A Comparative Analysis of Justiciability of Climate Change in the United States and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Political question; Political science; Politics; Law; Context (archaeology); Climate change; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Inura Fernando","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03288232814075758,"gpt":0.270340585075876,"spread":0.2374582569351184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004277715,0.00009355006,0.0004506612,0.00006542203,0.00006124548,0.00000223831,0.0001176945,0.00003122196,0.00006113235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002748922,0.00008325453,0.00004291849,0.0005866821,0.0004915347,0.00007738555,0.0001134741,0.00005786174,2.793609e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006093978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007669542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6384169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4138537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990999,0.0001172225,0.0002699346,0.000140456,0.0001659992,0.0002065601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992701,0.0002529432,0.0001966457,0.0001587094,0.00006042793,0.00006121215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007574448,0.0003923895,0.6733108,0.01826923,0.0003464978,0.00001103047,0.04210839,0.0002545834,0.0003498609,0.2640195,0.00003217777,0.0008298565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001788064,0.001264286,0.8332825,0.01917892,0.008235935,0.000007492096,0.03101012,0.0694645,0.001629517,0.001312384,0.03156607,0.001260182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976104,0.001065264,0.000009655572,0.0002549985,0.0000242024,0.0002611709,0.0003183224,0.00000340507,0.0004525656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756123,0.02407489,0.0001524434,0.000112744,0.00001303851,7.34456e-7,0.00003109108,0.000002355397,3.567704e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2627071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.596842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604885731","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v48i2.4743","title":"Law School as Social Innovation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; New Zealand Law Foundation","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Mandate; Project commissioning; Legal education; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Publishing; Public relations; Resilience (materials science); Sociology; Law; Social science; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Lorne Sossin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05594210053858727,"gpt":0.2648109310513972,"spread":0.2088688305128099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005883279,0.00009905697,0.0004176955,0.00005829016,0.0010822,0.00006125474,0.0005605308,0.00009214943,0.00117706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001057114,0.0001364622,0.0001220622,0.0001547095,0.0001707673,0.0004307711,0.0001254043,0.0001588037,0.0006858999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009798658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003719568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005938081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000382054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.0000229829,0.0002988663,0.0001480144,0.0000476502,0.0001406386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987918,0.00002025041,0.0006773532,0.0003572053,0.000106629,0.00004673912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006482538,0.00002747226,0.001243525,0.000213875,0.00003846917,0.000001213131,0.000262235,1.041443e-7,0.000005328079,0.9960461,0.001650743,0.0005044631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002981557,0.00001918282,0.002152541,0.0002636099,0.00001652276,2.813483e-7,0.00003219681,0.000002931769,0.00001733757,0.02841641,0.9686213,0.0001595639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06001369,0.005530092,0.0002645026,0.004595302,0.0008747301,0.0004004792,0.00005562765,0.00005692386,0.9282086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807959,0.0160653,0.0003038103,0.0007175644,0.0001525366,2.55151e-7,0.00003195766,0.00001189223,0.001920768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004713773","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v32i3.5870","title":"In Absentia Trials and the Right to Defend: The Incorporation of a European Human Rights Principle into the Dutch Criminial Justice System","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to a fair trial; Law; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Convention; Political science; Project commissioning; Administration of justice; Criminal justice; Publishing","authors":[{"name":"Evert Stamhuis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0451853290645602,"gpt":0.3142188533675821,"spread":0.2690335243030219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008284645,0.00009973971,0.0003627035,0.00004021607,0.001178128,0.00003559275,0.0005293316,0.00003465396,0.00004440665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002657787,0.00005525345,0.00009838415,0.000356886,0.0004427925,0.0001895322,0.000118576,0.0001376777,0.00003069337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005630806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003709724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01913691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02457541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955548,0.003397172,0.0004330381,0.0001854739,0.0003037217,0.0001257776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845,0.0005448213,0.000493161,0.0003119102,0.0001497822,0.00005031992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001856188,0.00003299557,0.00001081087,0.0013544,0.00002867938,0.0000147139,0.01838688,0.0000136024,0.0001044086,0.979004,0.0005072945,0.0003565468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004878295,0.00004832441,0.00005159446,0.001185557,0.001003101,0.000002422395,0.0033562,0.00001390913,0.00004716478,0.0005705535,0.9931481,0.00008519293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5549612,0.02269678,0.00976578,0.02655256,0.004815299,0.01439917,0.00006384696,0.0002321015,0.3665133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889238,0.009918191,0.0001695788,0.0002123484,0.0004831755,0.000001323511,0.000005983567,0.000007917602,0.0002776897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004382415","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i1.5968","title":"Access to Legal Education","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Peter C. Hogg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03313940678100288,"gpt":0.3528028254099387,"spread":0.3196634186289358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004373406,0.0000564146,0.0001306133,0.00004403694,0.0003899059,0.00004807748,0.0003825406,0.00004223202,0.01169084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008315164,0.00006784828,0.0000529122,0.0007592171,0.00008356426,0.0009815376,0.00001518959,0.0001110298,0.0005588052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000825695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008354057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02920213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003101113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992713,0.0001432814,0.0001326614,0.0001342252,0.0002054517,0.0001131325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992836,0.00006562557,0.00009441751,0.0001683265,0.0002732846,0.0001148086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001231991,0.0001562274,0.000122896,0.0001907871,0.00001244707,4.507688e-7,0.002657371,0.000005876013,0.000008358981,0.8784985,0.0829777,0.03535705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000388104,0.00000942564,0.00007797588,0.000346702,0.00003325814,2.683957e-7,0.0002649218,4.46181e-7,0.00001013803,0.0002466482,0.998895,0.00007635239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005100168,0.001724284,0.00009981087,0.08171704,0.0009879975,0.000507683,0.00000521822,0.00005656021,0.9098012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6547179,0.1564689,0.006026546,0.03946583,0.00193474,0.000005590533,0.00008719409,0.00003410389,0.1412591],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9159173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977226620","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i4.5628","title":"The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: The Canadian Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Convention; Project commissioning; Law; Preference; Publishing; Political science; Business; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Rajeev Sharma","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03721263206562045,"gpt":0.2965334689502709,"spread":0.2593208368846505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009335645,0.000052182,0.00008362716,0.00005942575,0.001221942,0.00003549507,0.0007084121,0.00002742171,0.0001598346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003207675,0.00003324257,0.000106245,0.0002862203,0.0004085577,0.0001195623,0.00001551558,0.00008246338,0.00001612766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001210214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001404241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06524801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4415355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992228,0.0001293949,0.0001564756,0.00008308466,0.0002983173,0.0001099849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982786,0.0009288397,0.0002067454,0.0001401938,0.0003967593,0.0000488708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001161114,0.0000145654,0.00001121311,0.000009443284,0.00002893971,1.467008e-7,0.0007795818,0.00003678384,0.00001007179,0.9968582,0.001609361,0.0006300299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001350087,0.00001437798,0.00005910941,0.0002182493,0.00003042063,1.161253e-7,0.0003860493,0.0002297366,0.00005211344,0.0001335723,0.9987036,0.00003763338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006679699,0.009566656,0.0006320281,0.1600344,0.003123796,0.0024827,0.0001473526,0.00004641448,0.8172869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396746,0.05365951,0.00005989742,0.001640559,0.0002755889,0.000002005307,0.00001749402,0.000005450376,0.004664964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9409766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338978280","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v46i2.4918","title":"The Implications of a Supreme Law Bill Of Rights for New Zealand Judicial Appointments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Commission; Judicial review; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Juliet Bull","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03882758577520705,"gpt":0.2898765720509398,"spread":0.2510489862757327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007832111,0.00007384445,0.0003456773,0.00001712153,0.0003723026,0.000008769548,0.0003880799,0.0000640877,0.00002010392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006869982,0.00005300151,0.0001333796,0.0002506776,0.0003703563,0.000133017,0.00003192091,0.00004203282,0.000004847614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004932875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003001253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.225823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04116832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990714,0.0001045917,0.0002811275,0.0001283985,0.000265517,0.0001490015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985893,0.0001726009,0.0004184895,0.0001814018,0.0005138885,0.0001243254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003781176,0.00004690398,0.0001257092,0.000271253,0.0000488056,1.191687e-7,0.002015935,0.000001518709,0.00003453209,0.9814265,0.01565059,0.0003402864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003058996,0.00007800876,0.000009584461,0.0005368808,0.0001051311,9.874404e-8,0.0001483027,7.105051e-7,0.0001334745,0.05427964,0.9443433,0.00005897874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02115082,0.1542987,0.005147294,0.05614754,0.006815996,0.01501268,0.0006736974,0.0002984596,0.7404549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832053,0.01423244,0.0004853453,0.0001048929,0.0004939304,0.000001682585,0.00001322921,0.00001006418,0.001453094],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9763278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975404603","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v35i1.5632","title":"\"Vexatious and an Abuse of the Process of the Court\": The Assets Company v Mere Roihi Cases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Certainty; Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Bryan Gilling","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0209048045182328,"gpt":0.2892961959220668,"spread":0.268391391403834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003511293,0.00006287936,0.0001782204,0.000006636363,0.0005585724,0.000008510907,0.0006155946,0.00003731342,0.00001612886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002051754,0.00003645125,0.00008562495,0.0002986754,0.0006686567,0.00009689949,0.00004706953,0.00008537314,0.000001104618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002520575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001132286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005800572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006426693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999264,0.000137113,0.0001438881,0.0001073681,0.0002601161,0.00008753063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991014,0.00008324447,0.0003095147,0.0003006002,0.0001671823,0.00003806853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006467916,0.0001429743,0.001281095,0.0007489901,0.00003712808,4.740891e-7,0.00971667,0.0001415587,0.00008053156,0.9874475,0.0001508442,0.0002457774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003367261,0.00003007453,0.003225214,0.001757017,0.0003265095,0.000002313278,0.002793982,0.00001082778,0.0005018217,0.003249706,0.9876395,0.0001263196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649066,0.006584003,0.00006329735,0.006216452,0.0002002483,0.001419909,0.00007151642,0.00002417744,0.02051381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868532,0.01290251,0.00005551997,0.00008064575,0.00002976421,4.28339e-7,9.923664e-7,0.000003088342,0.0000738763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8768769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410144503","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v55i2.9803","title":"Navigating Towards an Airworthy Protection Regime for New Zealand's Airline Passengers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Advertising; Political science; Publishing; Aeronautics; Business; Media studies; Engineering; Sociology; Law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0201092840442501,"gpt":0.3006136679215246,"spread":0.2805043838772744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000629953,0.00008044804,0.0002019393,0.00002035727,0.0003937435,0.00001836488,0.0002164111,0.0000844763,0.00008371573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000806136,0.00009031026,0.0001257959,0.0002367441,0.00007360669,0.0002628448,0.00001660556,0.0001137491,0.000006234251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001323749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002203283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02863253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006237834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991738,0.0001153389,0.0001715841,0.0001853569,0.0002179631,0.0001359604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999263,0.00005155317,0.0001959864,0.0001144781,0.0003066814,0.00006828977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006293634,0.00006058182,0.0001008076,0.0005604944,0.00005219202,8.516896e-7,0.001400987,0.00003963847,0.00010436,0.9408088,0.003052813,0.05375551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002665714,0.00005376909,0.00003104689,0.001788353,0.00007425016,1.075373e-7,0.000146602,0.00008856351,0.0001828379,0.003674953,0.9936032,0.000089727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08014558,0.02849392,0.2445482,0.3257587,0.01742294,0.02105797,0.0002676299,0.001888096,0.280417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8365797,0.07722491,0.02192172,0.002826049,0.003821226,0.00001445448,0.000491543,0.00005908601,0.05706125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9778359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W822600774","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v44i3/4.4982","title":"Māui And The People Of The North","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Carwyn Jones","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006742660316217058,"gpt":0.2004731846231281,"spread":0.193730524306911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002696297,0.00004960889,0.0002055664,0.000005882587,0.000436617,0.000007158587,0.00033814,0.00003186863,0.0002391012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004714911,0.0000327855,0.0000949033,0.0002398442,0.00085041,0.00009353006,0.00007166172,0.00005696925,0.00001609214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002497602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005768436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06679624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0329027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.000200645,0.00009776798,0.00007832998,0.0001895003,0.00009198938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994128,0.0001105613,0.0001348209,0.000154865,0.0001513825,0.00003561436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001794064,0.00002629469,0.005807516,0.000481864,0.00002930285,2.42361e-7,0.009975426,9.39033e-7,0.000003741874,0.9762052,0.00605741,0.001394092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001552716,0.00001021154,0.001630511,0.0002107151,0.00007539731,1.305348e-7,0.00036144,0.000001434313,0.000002103538,0.001329557,0.9961825,0.0000407507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4659379,0.09390607,0.0000467246,0.04076817,0.002345276,0.003637721,0.00003394341,0.00007968407,0.3932445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467589,0.05157853,0.00004763195,0.0002560139,0.00005431612,4.644526e-7,6.848595e-7,0.000002344644,0.001301121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976279444","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5529","title":"Using Human Rights Treaties to Resolve Ambiguity: the Advent of A Rights-Conscious Charming Betsy Canon","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Dualism; International human rights law; Political science; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Immigration; Common law; Fundamental rights; Sociology; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Melissa A. Waters","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03278274552012431,"gpt":0.3137602957655722,"spread":0.2809775502454479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001104477,0.00009336148,0.0002568145,0.00005976047,0.0009993368,0.00001088891,0.0003341557,0.00005866592,0.0001390346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000166602,0.00007857388,0.0001401653,0.0002445826,0.0002387223,0.0001253411,0.00003882489,0.00007683714,0.000008861957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002130826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005910161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1514288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1277195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988303,0.0001352285,0.0002567263,0.0001547475,0.0004425835,0.0001804608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990566,0.0001089156,0.0002962872,0.0001560846,0.0003091514,0.00007297217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001710431,0.00004196191,0.0001210793,0.0001255516,0.00003682069,0.000004660003,0.003425391,0.000008840631,0.000382919,0.995402,0.0001843653,0.0002492447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001455075,0.00004512991,0.00009274254,0.001466654,0.0001295732,4.966611e-7,0.0001783467,0.000005377771,0.001540074,0.005961481,0.9903206,0.0001140016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6617162,0.008358203,0.005876125,0.003180214,0.002133456,0.002688642,0.00008360908,0.0001294206,0.3158341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996837,0.0008118024,0.0009606375,0.0001191082,0.0002730991,2.322574e-7,0.000008852963,0.000005635488,0.0009836103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8881974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585351093","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i1.5048","title":"The Privy Council as the Final Court for the British Empire","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Empire; Section (typography); Work (physics); High Court; Engineering; Business","authors":[{"name":"Ivor Richardson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0528867023335188,"gpt":0.2841634866868282,"spread":0.2312767843533094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00200097,0.00007076993,0.0001520161,0.000002222692,0.004440331,0.000063951,0.0005764478,0.00004272123,0.0001491939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002506694,0.00004646335,0.0001632251,0.0001233599,0.001911876,0.0001153069,0.00004078272,0.000108665,0.00003797263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001581854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001296991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02028752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008527442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988527,0.0001732794,0.0001236646,0.00008822338,0.0004809604,0.0002811256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980066,0.001167474,0.0001531908,0.0002002166,0.000388205,0.00008427935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006259088,0.00001326429,0.00007301667,0.0000519998,0.00002846219,3.759588e-7,0.0004541019,0.000001198553,2.521015e-7,0.9688868,0.02907646,0.001407807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007643682,0.00001390746,0.00002866597,0.000219865,0.0001436878,0.000002652821,0.0006235705,0.000002476494,7.9138e-7,0.0005073451,0.998314,0.00006655424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00128826,0.2451477,0.001722898,0.06535988,0.003456239,0.002271193,0.0001403709,0.00007861736,0.6805348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4988917,0.4563552,0.0003619976,0.006568842,0.002575887,0.000006250141,0.00001160976,0.00001744151,0.03521102],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201809459","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5396","title":"Book Review: Human Rights in the South Pacific – Challenges and Changes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Harwood","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0224175806053055,"gpt":0.2528157274758621,"spread":0.2303981468705566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001011597,0.0001068265,0.0003741941,0.00002410675,0.0006312532,0.000007554891,0.000262454,0.00005699371,0.0001541982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009769493,0.00007944924,0.00007590115,0.0001447511,0.0002241641,0.00007416831,0.00001785298,0.0001087621,0.00001022218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002115965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001104878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000560855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004176471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998933,0.0003198274,0.0001310608,0.0001878973,0.0002391919,0.0001890714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995181,0.00006706713,0.0001295791,0.0001860075,0.00005464592,0.00004460575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001010775,0.00008299866,0.00001889633,0.003304323,0.00003151958,0.00002292821,0.06365769,7.464025e-8,0.000001308692,0.8118054,0.1152316,0.005833212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001035213,0.00006191422,0.00003953937,0.003763476,0.00006243744,4.049976e-7,0.00313737,1.238709e-7,4.125443e-7,0.0005099786,0.9922222,0.00009856621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004565628,0.7627162,0.000001159015,0.0179321,0.000077271,0.0003869707,0.000002905302,0.00001523823,0.2188225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03184205,0.9656836,0.0000124893,0.00130437,0.0001048019,3.764052e-7,0.000002806908,0.000001862714,0.001047634],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4855153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950114440","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v48i3.4735","title":"Fiducia in Public Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Private law; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Public law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Duty; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Lindsay Breach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0487478028784544,"gpt":0.3028021202820408,"spread":0.2540543174035864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006171754,0.00005979903,0.0001996255,0.00001614714,0.001040768,0.0000511205,0.0007543725,0.00006001603,0.000347038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005250219,0.00006767336,0.00008523308,0.0001015053,0.0004350487,0.0003511149,0.00009073224,0.00009774966,0.00009459099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006640975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009003788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03985128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04883491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999296,0.00008028414,0.0001213373,0.0001578947,0.0001772447,0.0001672135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991698,0.00003958179,0.0001961797,0.0004114857,0.00009387606,0.00008902655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001083913,0.00002778479,0.0003133057,0.0001076463,0.000004406381,0.000001469821,0.0003399094,3.217885e-7,0.000006722381,0.9981473,0.0004072549,0.0006427661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001088537,0.000005143959,0.0001733818,0.0003678478,0.00001612042,6.907898e-8,0.00008286541,0.000002733608,0.000009498797,0.002231727,0.9969279,0.00007389948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004042189,0.003469948,0.00008300509,0.01849842,0.0002979416,0.0004631971,0.00001372666,0.00004244907,0.9730891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619954,0.03619347,0.000288196,0.0002539353,0.0001122187,4.278876e-7,0.000003760155,0.000004336198,0.001148233],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9685214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949536135","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i4.5333","title":"Foreword: The Dynamic Evolution of International Law – Rise or Decline?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo; Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; New Zealand Law Foundation; National University of Singapore; York University","keywords":"Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Field (mathematics); International law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Campbell McLachlan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01496412606717491,"gpt":0.2810331926632186,"spread":0.2660690665960437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005907104,0.00007144066,0.0001742068,0.00002860391,0.0004572941,0.000008959469,0.000655069,0.00005760307,0.001751618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003254168,0.00005312947,0.0001272952,0.0000991749,0.0009372722,0.0001786663,0.00006759013,0.00007228278,0.00007149256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000154036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001142527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009012129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05025038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990275,0.0001237873,0.0001930328,0.0001321082,0.0004095721,0.0001140199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989045,0.0001118085,0.0002509134,0.0001569116,0.0005352987,0.00004051765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003419863,0.00003072058,0.00002837322,0.00007092542,0.00003440853,9.251186e-7,0.0004965406,0.000001028671,0.000007664716,0.9987404,0.0004472432,0.0001075877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001513958,0.00004473602,0.00004895413,0.0005730001,0.00006083769,4.738584e-7,0.00005851777,0.00009573521,0.00002337605,0.03182442,0.9670534,0.00006519817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06606901,0.008498886,0.008415521,0.01264238,0.007968183,0.001801278,0.0002633545,0.0001627014,0.8941787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860989,0.004356181,0.0004468109,0.0001886971,0.0003610372,2.620888e-7,0.000008881156,0.000005170406,0.00853401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.966916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975264628","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i3.5612","title":"Book Review: The Constitution of Independence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Commonwealth; Independence (probability theory); Constitutional theory; Nothing; Constitutional law; Law; Historiography; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Caroline Morris","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01358565194224543,"gpt":0.2650917697447398,"spread":0.2515061178024944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007240244,0.00007210906,0.0002741296,0.00001348824,0.0003481442,0.000003165317,0.0003661969,0.0000501929,0.00147841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008865891,0.00006258486,0.0001323611,0.0002010797,0.002027013,0.0001802095,0.00003264738,0.00011221,0.00005434776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007115443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006731462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003400518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004260972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989511,0.0002140069,0.0002076385,0.000111861,0.0003774077,0.0001379203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990419,0.0001539759,0.0002713851,0.0001924715,0.0002714949,0.00006883538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002296692,0.0000162172,0.00001292119,0.0006307799,0.00001228053,6.84415e-7,0.0000953314,0.000004471875,0.000003282622,0.9251708,0.07362184,0.0004290541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005598303,0.00001101397,0.000002019226,0.003590111,0.0001222699,0.000001132285,0.00004364145,0.000001062556,0.00002074426,0.00004955941,0.9960357,0.00006677628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001368124,0.6758803,0.0004376133,0.01281524,0.000179618,0.000374293,0.00002066697,0.00001940785,0.3102592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02797714,0.9573338,0.0002301897,0.01199179,0.0001461112,2.654052e-7,0.000005540882,0.000001979578,0.002313178],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347051369","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5519","title":"Hegemonic Federalism: The Democratic Implications of the UN Security Council's \"Legislative\" Phase","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Legislature; Federalism; Public administration; Democracy; Legislation; Hegemony; Government (linguistics); Security council; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Craig Forcese","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03143071278229796,"gpt":0.289482856809323,"spread":0.258052144027025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001571101,0.00008476843,0.0002044019,0.0000132314,0.001181867,0.00001380027,0.0006831869,0.00005474089,0.0004044294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005203372,0.00005763811,0.0001913314,0.0001795197,0.0006710847,0.0001362401,0.00004752346,0.0001317984,0.00001207901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000206246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003008793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004593952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0158587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987269,0.0002150763,0.0002311637,0.0001352562,0.0005316462,0.0001599392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984488,0.0002618168,0.0003331464,0.0002743111,0.000629488,0.00005237974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008031555,0.00006629009,0.00003653608,0.00008175083,0.00003209696,5.309029e-7,0.002744646,9.003626e-7,0.00002166105,0.9960386,0.0008753522,0.00009358719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002350516,0.00001939429,0.0001354151,0.0003534029,0.0001085532,5.890682e-7,0.00008645032,0.000004738105,0.0001217648,0.09113039,0.9077313,0.00007297007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1646248,0.01001023,0.002152527,0.02173744,0.001525148,0.00242173,0.0001144888,0.00008645901,0.7973272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940916,0.003281533,0.00008176786,0.0003862635,0.0001228861,3.000212e-7,0.000003777725,0.000004372533,0.002027521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9068559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9090083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210337685","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v52i4.7400","title":"Dissonance between Fact and Law: The Example of Visual Artistic Practice and Income Tax Concessions for Peak Copyright","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Common law copyright; Statute; Legislation; Income tax; Law; Tax law; Fair use; Economics; Common law; Law and economics; Double taxation; Public economics; Political science; Intellectual property; Copyright law","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Barrett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02690961963721568,"gpt":0.2516297811312664,"spread":0.2247201614940508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005690993,0.0001184404,0.000351772,0.00003145217,0.000711368,0.00003236241,0.0002400406,0.00002622852,0.000691572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119074,0.00008768827,0.00006898947,0.0002158785,0.0002550992,0.0005002538,0.0002943284,0.0001324789,0.000005364108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001902885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001886982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00658906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000202018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99918,0.00005823151,0.0002194357,0.0002180655,0.000192445,0.000131871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986772,0.0005941211,0.0003757461,0.000158193,0.000177612,0.00001711495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005886413,0.0003370522,0.001654946,0.01196193,0.0003384458,0.000009073419,0.00109492,0.00000904988,0.0004789273,0.9286839,0.04544894,0.009394214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003050601,0.00007135532,0.0001832511,0.0004241509,0.0003285141,0.000001010414,0.0001325002,0.0007333144,0.00002291119,0.0009479863,0.9967288,0.0001211187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4175191,0.2275612,0.01897771,0.03552533,0.00455302,0.0163725,0.00121198,0.0005366571,0.2777425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947422,0.004096292,0.0001304148,0.0005258545,0.0001444469,0.00000221897,0.00003116626,0.00001053986,0.0003168854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9512799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624364408","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5945","title":"Search for Principle - The Government's Liability in Negligence for the Careless Exercise of its Statutory Powers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Project commissioning; Liability; Government (linguistics); Law; Publishing; Business; Strict liability; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Geuther","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02710318604166993,"gpt":0.3033416156082833,"spread":0.2762384295666134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00134168,0.00007037699,0.0002121931,0.000006352286,0.0004661517,0.00001015812,0.0006335785,0.00004690557,0.0001770459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003963635,0.00005293249,0.0001489379,0.0002615931,0.0003267836,0.00009896423,0.00004006405,0.00008560099,0.000004202977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001393886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001683847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003743198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00206398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990267,0.0001018865,0.0001928802,0.0001724417,0.0003175791,0.0001885812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885,0.0005365606,0.0001141947,0.000295472,0.0001557085,0.00004805564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001557694,0.0001925443,0.0005502909,0.002546964,0.00003673036,2.700063e-7,0.009663614,0.0006208453,0.00008268667,0.9622434,0.0005395591,0.02336733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001511288,0.00002129155,0.0001375005,0.0004124149,0.00005737793,1.801311e-8,0.001144488,0.0001241723,0.0002107673,0.0001246046,0.9975553,0.00006091242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5700012,0.1923215,0.0096119,0.04087207,0.001926562,0.05562119,0.003410636,0.0002186626,0.1260163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8143145,0.1830109,0.0003724874,0.0001133967,0.00007587476,0.00001968796,0.000006415646,0.000009639677,0.00207712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.565862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}