{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":38,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"c79d541ba869","filters":{"venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2210338013","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5228","title":"Why Legal History Matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Project commissioning; Publishing; Law; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jim Phillips","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0128029408878248,"gpt":0.2298284229361456,"spread":0.2170254820483208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01606259,0.0003010913,0.000854712,0.003018662,0.006662583,0.01143512,0.00161389,0.01140832,0.009888232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05022538,0.0007664081,0.0005036905,0.002508021,0.02074401,0.01499524,0.00313072,0.01122536,0.002660839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01657535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02278958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1585424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.983516,0.006675603,0.0008004129,0.001428555,0.005257906,0.00232147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627195,0.02290177,0.0020944,0.001039693,0.008868922,0.002375774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001735879,0.00001495789,0.0008393905,0.0005474393,0.00002879806,0.0002272346,0.006500287,0.0001143881,0.0001575399,0.4952823,0.4649178,0.03135251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009217697,0.00000894658,0.001584903,0.001157742,0.00001507179,0.0001513956,0.004788984,0.00005949613,0.00009233221,0.09993069,0.8921759,0.00002522836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.00228838,0.1258676,0.0005905539,0.8087694,0.005902359,0.00001606009,0.00007118072,0.00002168741,0.05647275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1860356,0.1312358,0.0007735736,0.6101393,0.01371316,0.00005621551,0.0001952955,0.0001449868,0.05770605],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.12246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2434945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213989475","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5214","title":"Informal Land Titles: Snowden v Baker (1844)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Statutory law; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); High Court; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Bruce Kercher","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01440615935590859,"gpt":0.2608198726124173,"spread":0.2464137132565088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002231731,0.0002173856,0.0002494765,0.001098132,0.004215051,0.002928082,0.0008361867,0.004767978,0.003494804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005873913,0.0003629767,0.00025652,0.001300009,0.007246486,0.001706802,0.002011959,0.002672965,0.0005527447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006469785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008547106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2439709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3731343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975568,0.0004849175,0.0001147169,0.0002962133,0.0008715484,0.0006757345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985425,0.0007272095,0.0002276614,0.0000710507,0.0003087435,0.0001226687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003123565,0.00001453488,0.003444612,0.0001194985,0.000009011252,0.001328478,0.01401087,0.0001633311,0.0002846805,0.8773834,0.08196051,0.02124986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004060493,0.00005538805,0.01614347,0.0005529873,0.00002319599,0.0006476337,0.003483764,0.0001142818,0.0004625557,0.05812051,0.9203053,0.00005029868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1621574,0.01751157,0.002865391,0.0351909,0.000954856,0.0001594069,0.0004673448,0.00004474412,0.7806484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7321208,0.006516959,0.001990673,0.03613431,0.0007945518,0.0001957476,0.0001786908,0.000035771,0.2220326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2439709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4851017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550297742","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5383","title":"Legal Pluralism, Customary Law and Human Rights in Francophone African Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"French; Human rights; Charter; Political science; Legal pluralism; Colonialism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Comparative law; Geography; Legal realism; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jacques Frémont","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00787781370084571,"gpt":0.23692712362303,"spread":0.2290493099221843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004742941,0.0001768179,0.000261508,0.001924099,0.005707652,0.004654346,0.0004575217,0.001975709,0.001787419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004545475,0.0001453016,0.0001627769,0.00266162,0.01510728,0.003635983,0.002165946,0.001368631,0.00005588077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007469773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007463126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1144346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1340071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969178,0.001617561,0.0001438708,0.0001578016,0.0003831187,0.0007797081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966969,0.002140793,0.0005510241,0.0001210548,0.0002897375,0.0002004095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001470358,0.0000263729,0.0030052,0.0002083066,0.000009960429,0.0005925561,0.01717611,0.0002924755,0.0001177377,0.9545627,0.002577922,0.02141608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006532569,0.000129125,0.08448792,0.005297587,0.00006651281,0.001508992,0.09327829,0.0008103641,0.0006462663,0.3569025,0.4567045,0.0001025555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4206715,0.1755965,0.001181373,0.04105909,0.0002232788,0.00002952987,0.00005037053,0.00000746607,0.361181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796188,0.01443752,0.0001581443,0.001002812,0.00005756887,0.000009964521,0.000009021102,0.000001432659,0.004704868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1144346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.227537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123738432","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i4.5334","title":"International Law and the Practice of Legality: Stability and Change","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; International law; Political science; Sources of international law; Municipal law; Statute; Public law; Public international law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jutta Brunnée","is_ca":false},{"name":"Stephen J. Toope","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03258657486503207,"gpt":0.2930863240080652,"spread":0.2604997491430331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01384625,0.0003557554,0.0006897111,0.003965642,0.005321617,0.01510417,0.001668106,0.005410412,0.003388047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01864712,0.0003769407,0.0005537503,0.00488142,0.06705692,0.01494317,0.005621819,0.008149682,0.0004489365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01379644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01668156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02799973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02274589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.978713,0.01284583,0.0008266356,0.001515002,0.004351395,0.001748088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855649,0.009019253,0.001701993,0.00125451,0.001739703,0.0007197805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001034235,0.000003356948,0.0001290834,0.00004113777,0.000001891562,0.00001483378,0.001479651,0.00007883316,0.00001584866,0.9934418,0.001067894,0.003724609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008038383,0.0000209254,0.001432255,0.0008126141,0.000009176796,0.0001054083,0.003989383,0.0003891523,0.00008862809,0.8180751,0.1750507,0.00001838948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02187276,0.1458678,0.03178738,0.162313,0.0008467764,0.00008009312,0.0000558565,0.00006418739,0.6371122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103255,0.04590721,0.005900383,0.01421952,0.001271998,0.0001603858,0.00005529728,0.00007287299,0.02208678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02799973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1001006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976893161","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5518","title":"Deliberation and Legitimacy in Transnational Governance: The Case of Environmental Impact Assessments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Legitimacy; Environmental governance; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Transnational governance; Criticism; Corporate governance; Harm; Democratic legitimacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Economics; Management; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Neil Craik","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009568564324980777,"gpt":0.2713858767380855,"spread":0.2618173124131047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0396147,0.0004554301,0.001010377,0.002239671,0.01758122,0.01708116,0.002330619,0.01367201,0.004098193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05774107,0.000789258,0.001222351,0.002725959,0.0486031,0.01401434,0.02087349,0.01109139,0.0004686735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01012726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01137866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01683735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9563714,0.02845211,0.001831222,0.00330108,0.005758649,0.004285491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9389631,0.04944138,0.003046803,0.004352163,0.00303215,0.001164388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007113221,0.000008829781,0.0003757302,0.00001452029,0.000006120599,0.0003991573,0.005946602,0.0006605492,0.00006392834,0.9900698,0.0003932644,0.002054357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004763266,0.00001949255,0.0005793528,0.000136946,0.00001936284,0.0003073292,0.005378076,0.003103053,0.0003442554,0.9570795,0.03295232,0.00003264553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1767945,0.0016958,0.08627501,0.06241969,0.0002345075,0.0002455482,0.00004281713,0.00009067223,0.6722015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856588,0.0002683957,0.004967479,0.001144889,0.00005385595,0.000163647,0.00001113657,0.00002876174,0.007703052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0396147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.209505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976173574","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v37i4.5583","title":"Recognising Multi-textualism: Rethinking New Zealand's Legal History","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty of Waitangi; Treaty; Project commissioning; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Publishing; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Richard Boast","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04323443744467582,"gpt":0.2723561829921062,"spread":0.2291217455474304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0265395,0.0003515529,0.0007841394,0.009968839,0.01187005,0.01840302,0.002820633,0.00437407,0.003228893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04559439,0.0006610797,0.0003913937,0.007333372,0.04276696,0.02267933,0.00855084,0.006981304,0.0002174181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03521613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03563782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4484037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6080728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9837459,0.006269884,0.001064194,0.001329366,0.006390596,0.001200049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582261,0.02833667,0.003556089,0.002048924,0.006598335,0.001233936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002055102,0.00001195659,0.001399317,0.0005824697,0.00002417556,0.0006093004,0.1520114,0.0001489658,0.0002899888,0.7900087,0.01051908,0.04437409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000221984,0.00004375682,0.01418494,0.00409126,0.00006230614,0.0005183489,0.08272803,0.0004445,0.0003713866,0.1145159,0.7829415,0.00007574804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1099535,0.1324126,0.007745453,0.2471982,0.003415634,0.0001349633,0.0001729338,0.00006027668,0.4989066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919339,0.03869996,0.002976765,0.01169936,0.001214307,0.0001315796,0.00007895112,0.0001166993,0.02574351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4484037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8915873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219607269","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v39i2.5464","title":"Freedom of Expression, Commercial Expression and Tobacco in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Supreme court; Freedom of expression; Law; Flexibility (engineering); Value (mathematics); Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Economics; Computer science; Management; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Caroline Reid","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01124954062760652,"gpt":0.1883194282826774,"spread":0.1770698876550709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002372845,0.0002643981,0.0004738798,0.001841033,0.02178385,0.00953022,0.001971842,0.005732325,0.01105356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007650474,0.0005062869,0.0006344703,0.002687782,0.00961553,0.001928388,0.003989009,0.006997899,0.0003870278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08783077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1200055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948112,0.0003096852,0.0001503509,0.0004313398,0.002195646,0.002101782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950225,0.001871265,0.0002978283,0.0002230704,0.001487466,0.001097856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000636904,0.00008818317,0.01494252,0.0001408046,0.00003812544,0.001337692,0.009636864,0.0008198285,0.0006021309,0.9043053,0.03537865,0.03264616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001397674,0.00009070644,0.09430723,0.0009243872,0.000207968,0.0007503641,0.02433579,0.004408045,0.001918199,0.1159924,0.7565694,0.0003556761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1551493,0.01079089,0.001367454,0.06606115,0.0004120841,0.0001881197,0.0005282195,0.00005319358,0.7654495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8580468,0.005119857,0.0009524309,0.01779213,0.000111583,0.00006957573,0.0001779833,0.00003353449,0.1176962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08783077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6372598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218652726","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i2.5264","title":"Immigration Bill 2007: Special Advocates and the Right to be Heard","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mirroring; Immigration; Appeal; Political science; Law; Bill of rights; Human rights; Subject (documents); Immigration law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Lani Inverarity","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01922557278183171,"gpt":0.2581632762789021,"spread":0.2389377034970704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01862293,0.0005252531,0.0008350812,0.001229544,0.007661483,0.009508369,0.00245192,0.03480372,0.008706955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04356077,0.001369599,0.001254863,0.0009691045,0.00929833,0.004607717,0.006827158,0.01967933,0.002870458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007543145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03271365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07393283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08942606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9786632,0.004411706,0.002086163,0.00215055,0.008360147,0.004328175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829922,0.008936347,0.001423346,0.001347396,0.003355094,0.001945583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003464273,0.00006075352,0.001530607,0.00013811,0.00001309229,0.000689161,0.003873236,0.00007792504,0.0005122431,0.6936471,0.2804454,0.01897771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008492792,0.00007671538,0.00730619,0.0008499562,0.00004160665,0.0007297352,0.001607641,0.0001461964,0.0005013991,0.02483557,0.963741,0.000078956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02189391,0.007807106,0.002549724,0.4584832,0.006212901,0.0003862815,0.0004304252,0.0001916075,0.5020447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1720884,0.004993466,0.004955615,0.5183658,0.003412071,0.001013459,0.0004874234,0.0001391973,0.2945446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07393283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.147005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372080422","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i3-4.5810","title":"Protecting Rights in Common Law Constitutional Systems; a Framework for a Comparative Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Political science; Common law; Constitution; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Legislature; Human rights; Constitutional review; Fundamental rights; Comparative law; Politics; Democracy; Sovereignty","authors":[{"name":"Cheryl Saunders","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0721219157603624,"gpt":0.314255935206012,"spread":0.2421340194456496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02245982,0.0007836307,0.001182456,0.008171767,0.01030487,0.01772659,0.002904929,0.007422251,0.006506816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02012844,0.0005419767,0.0009995322,0.007433138,0.08175331,0.03524666,0.007777997,0.007894614,0.0004417104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006908162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01058663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008277475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9710104,0.02390024,0.0004225365,0.001043049,0.002040413,0.00158338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818712,0.01438022,0.0008635403,0.001573601,0.0008123095,0.0004990796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[7.523893e-7,0.000002859745,0.00001789737,0.000008347151,9.718746e-7,0.000009936433,0.0008940207,0.00005265273,0.000006225371,0.9982849,0.000113766,0.0006077433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009523119,0.00001943116,0.0002265499,0.0002479215,0.000005837271,0.00005915563,0.006109584,0.0004696659,0.00005727636,0.9448566,0.04792757,0.00001086739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03224602,0.04383282,0.09942475,0.040661,0.0006023423,0.0002107684,0.0001296506,0.00006420709,0.7828284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444594,0.01332945,0.02491781,0.002902188,0.000557197,0.000646994,0.0001112344,0.00008735461,0.01298846],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02245982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1400609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308837678","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5386","title":"A Pacific Human Rights Mechanism: Specific Challenges and Requirements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Island Health","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Human rights; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Project commissioning; Key (lock); Political science; Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Business; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Social science; Computer security; Finance; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Kathryn Hay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03629845025561608,"gpt":0.2645375673411293,"spread":0.2282391170855133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05610413,0.0004949503,0.001036222,0.001365261,0.01273758,0.01964248,0.005129758,0.01459325,0.004793463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06075774,0.001159746,0.001002202,0.001314401,0.02066465,0.01721744,0.01025958,0.0203337,0.0005339175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008606719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05618508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03092098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03549119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9519188,0.02207087,0.003467127,0.003229346,0.01294275,0.006371199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466099,0.03313408,0.002763369,0.00257754,0.0110478,0.003867287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001319263,0.00005075051,0.001504519,0.0003183028,0.00001475228,0.00109778,0.008273962,0.0008016049,0.0005090143,0.9681313,0.005974349,0.01331044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008721316,0.0002255117,0.0065966,0.003031256,0.000098996,0.002875295,0.06636461,0.003390768,0.00240036,0.4729621,0.4416971,0.0002702767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08358756,0.005636356,0.04109707,0.3186224,0.001074041,0.001382065,0.0001312556,0.000162974,0.5483063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8779145,0.004244729,0.04504613,0.03828825,0.0006248756,0.001460152,0.0001095043,0.0001243672,0.03218758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05610413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2967106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158256369","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5521","title":"The Democratic Challenge of Incorporation: International Human Rights Treaties and National Constitutions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Treaty; Political science; Democracy; Law; State (computer science); International community; International human rights law; Supreme court; Economic Justice","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Harrington","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0218276695956688,"gpt":0.2848495493933192,"spread":0.2630218797976504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01475665,0.0004533581,0.0007207044,0.001606965,0.01220811,0.01892043,0.001650349,0.008237567,0.005255004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0177513,0.0005194111,0.0007584137,0.001635643,0.03589226,0.01047383,0.009612615,0.01422957,0.000735467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01983793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02473925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07845221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.108907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9810477,0.008056043,0.0005374059,0.001587835,0.004789148,0.00398195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948403,0.002849489,0.000434365,0.0007587919,0.0006613164,0.0004557115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001199198,0.000002743469,0.00001924695,0.000002767086,6.725218e-7,0.000009977953,0.0005555984,0.00003818522,0.00000716297,0.9973204,0.001136894,0.000905157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001757702,0.000008655645,0.0003670372,0.0001573752,0.000009490007,0.00004260096,0.001652367,0.0002794001,0.0001149865,0.7743973,0.222936,0.0000172348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00737312,0.004918834,0.003677087,0.06242849,0.0005430334,0.00002345478,0.0000288491,0.00002196114,0.9209852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8235692,0.005635063,0.004124775,0.03340142,0.00145646,0.000249484,0.00008265015,0.0000768175,0.1314043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07845221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1559911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231547810","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i1.5412","title":"The State of Judicial Scrutiny of Public Contracting in New Zealand and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Procurement; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Public administration; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Public law; Government procurement; Law and economics; Business; Economics","authors":[{"name":"David Mullan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02330331090424894,"gpt":0.2576232751249873,"spread":0.2343199642207383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01571468,0.0002984802,0.0009348833,0.00598058,0.01936853,0.01777337,0.004150404,0.006866327,0.003685727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07243038,0.0008539277,0.0008055065,0.007050364,0.02066061,0.003139094,0.003855501,0.006797513,0.0001707078],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1522668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1871077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9634482,0.003369976,0.001562317,0.002930618,0.02044604,0.008242765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508177,0.01897331,0.0053298,0.001819028,0.01968888,0.00337125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002878427,0.0001084071,0.02669001,0.000881038,0.0002862199,0.002334607,0.04184464,0.002178462,0.002900841,0.7488489,0.06018819,0.113451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002629129,0.0001563756,0.2099848,0.00283531,0.0005321553,0.0008632433,0.04190167,0.003594572,0.002785755,0.06009062,0.6761823,0.0008102622],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3738962,0.05003474,0.00173164,0.1600937,0.0008129372,0.0002484712,0.0004592421,0.0001014844,0.4126216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699807,0.008966927,0.0008772095,0.008205852,0.0002395597,0.00004839375,0.00008789181,0.00003261669,0.01156087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1522668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952609420","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i4.5023","title":"The Shafts of Strife and War: A Critical Analysis of the Immigration (Mass Arrivals) Amendment Bill","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Immigration; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Immigration law; Geography; Politics","authors":[{"name":"C. H. FOULKES","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01621536091571139,"gpt":0.2825750342800575,"spread":0.2663596733643461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01813527,0.0004603268,0.0007280941,0.002841471,0.0177559,0.0134447,0.002222941,0.01459858,0.002931849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0306616,0.0007512093,0.0008630899,0.001515016,0.04175446,0.007645361,0.004259897,0.01761748,0.0003031855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03274034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02468137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1251574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1613763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9890237,0.005159028,0.0004224784,0.0007261078,0.002617177,0.002051552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98252,0.01428905,0.0008689792,0.0002826983,0.001664233,0.0003751141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001116075,0.00001576838,0.0002552432,0.00005939834,0.000003307799,0.0003810877,0.02893913,0.0001103945,0.00009987006,0.9588653,0.008579525,0.00267983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004200499,0.0001043787,0.005898393,0.002013525,0.00005205164,0.0003549263,0.1469757,0.001012952,0.0009579347,0.2014651,0.6409714,0.0001516439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1227506,0.0153779,0.007909125,0.2928752,0.003449023,0.0006387804,0.0001286058,0.00004823297,0.5568226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8837905,0.005438639,0.002481481,0.05532413,0.001251148,0.0005087482,0.00003757219,0.00007157336,0.05109618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1251574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2488578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005497808","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5939","title":"\"We are all Here to Stay\"; Addressing Aboriginal Title Claims after Delgamuukw v British Columbia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Media studies; Library science; Management; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Rachel A Yurkowski","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0174499600638087,"gpt":0.2701826070240427,"spread":0.252732646960234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003069856,0.0003304774,0.0003788287,0.002106524,0.02868243,0.009175343,0.002687792,0.01031292,0.003324399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118224,0.0004623739,0.0003362185,0.002647817,0.007312982,0.002000594,0.002775713,0.005983988,0.0002523599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06503066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943755,0.0009328031,0.0001427364,0.0003985581,0.00211453,0.002035975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954738,0.002147894,0.0001801071,0.0001182886,0.001656955,0.0004228171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001155498,0.00008177008,0.0179593,0.0008509249,0.00008897806,0.008997953,0.08996665,0.001151225,0.002715941,0.6143022,0.2103112,0.05345819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008642759,0.0001025354,0.06017434,0.001709538,0.0002582898,0.000846529,0.08599886,0.001135208,0.00234775,0.03685084,0.8101696,0.000320124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2311289,0.05585394,0.001448006,0.1453241,0.001727358,0.0003138076,0.0005539422,0.00008350556,0.5635664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.784155,0.01290627,0.0008606964,0.05530957,0.0003212815,0.0001191397,0.0001465693,0.00004938203,0.1461323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06503066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4718326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949360093","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v46i3.4898","title":"The Crown's Relationship with Tribal Peoples and the Legal Dynamics for the Resolution of Historical and Contemporary Claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Legalism (Western philosophy); Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Ceremony; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"PG McHugh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01895321507556511,"gpt":0.2148043660116618,"spread":0.1958511509360967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008817337,0.0001774571,0.0004021029,0.001649551,0.01932121,0.01267312,0.001779705,0.005038458,0.00401627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01155752,0.0002935567,0.0002464489,0.001550797,0.08139329,0.005043196,0.005132728,0.005607403,0.0002934666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0161809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02061194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1995308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3113082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922085,0.003260588,0.0002418107,0.0006444135,0.001824184,0.001820491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954889,0.002284148,0.0004573457,0.0004461499,0.0008126682,0.0005107324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004670075,0.00000929652,0.0006014252,0.00004083107,0.00000448811,0.0003587178,0.05740646,0.0000788427,0.0001615525,0.9331613,0.001935865,0.006236454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018102,0.00005015426,0.008334927,0.0008362714,0.00003145504,0.0007568048,0.1574445,0.0004337586,0.0003369277,0.3200213,0.5116669,0.00006886838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1397681,0.02109271,0.003126018,0.06641126,0.0003916032,0.00005219888,0.00002142904,0.00002690121,0.7691098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819443,0.002406928,0.0005022982,0.001594176,0.0001542701,0.00001645415,0.000003975023,0.00001105173,0.01336646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1995308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3967388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124426488","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i1.5588","title":"The Needs of the Many and the Needs of the Few: A New System of Public Interest Intervention for New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Adversarial system; Intervention (counseling); Public interest; Order (exchange); Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Fair dealing; Balance (ability); Public relations; Business; Sociology; Legislature; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Edward E. Clark","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02554518457729594,"gpt":0.2556189662009864,"spread":0.2300737816236905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007753486,0.0002714135,0.0004888065,0.0009447068,0.007475212,0.01079337,0.001861519,0.004754846,0.006182416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01101476,0.0008376354,0.0006552594,0.000517674,0.01265412,0.006919824,0.007072426,0.006133175,0.0004667021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01831253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06207216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2516329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4644657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937511,0.001560121,0.0004998965,0.0009581495,0.002101236,0.001129518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950792,0.001274874,0.0004554715,0.0006886775,0.0009619325,0.00153987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001821829,0.0003803788,0.01044929,0.000956648,0.00007109946,0.003428281,0.04796972,0.001776268,0.0138218,0.7384509,0.03021671,0.1522967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003976972,0.0005902566,0.04288396,0.001055945,0.000190766,0.002597984,0.02176404,0.004345234,0.002357975,0.1824598,0.7408751,0.0004812979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2551749,0.00602812,0.04163026,0.2232915,0.001099362,0.002331141,0.000152766,0.0003632502,0.4699286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8307655,0.002338536,0.05065238,0.01503691,0.000286047,0.0008602054,0.00004790004,0.000125691,0.09988687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2516329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5003364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414343126","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i2.5845","title":"The Patentability of Human Beings: The Effect of a Proposed Exclusion in the Patents Act 1953","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Project commissioning; Patent law; Publishing; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Economics; Intellectual property","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra MacBean","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05150712075956262,"gpt":0.2169979599029825,"spread":0.1654908391434199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01935652,0.0004795858,0.0009500952,0.00196626,0.008665645,0.009739451,0.002175567,0.02260752,0.003736299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04614308,0.0005152124,0.001978764,0.001909278,0.02964759,0.00610813,0.005248497,0.0151615,0.0007283887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008933783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01658466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07097158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05108712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9846837,0.004634673,0.00106694,0.001645504,0.005717665,0.002251593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9497386,0.04142656,0.002878773,0.001861937,0.003205476,0.000888571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002591143,0.00001799276,0.0005013685,0.00001837787,0.000008843373,0.000135298,0.001189197,0.0001854987,0.0001057681,0.9909377,0.004777412,0.002096731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002867685,0.0001270248,0.007124849,0.0005920267,0.000206873,0.000336033,0.001991946,0.001757826,0.001411729,0.7785323,0.2074768,0.0001557863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09574369,0.005568352,0.01082345,0.2058645,0.001440761,0.0001573399,0.0004292573,0.00007442337,0.6798983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828301,0.002766558,0.004164256,0.07482687,0.001537312,0.0002854412,0.0000891173,0.00003911359,0.03346132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07097158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.141117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387652472","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v54i1.8446","title":"The Criminal Law, the Intelligence and Security Act and the Protective Security Requirements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Parliament; Criminal law; Statute; Political science; Criminal code; Common law; Legislature; Legislative history; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Geoffrey Palmer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":0,"score":{"opus":0.04387486937391837,"gpt":0.2984201245111002,"spread":0.2545452551371818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002677789,0.0007205328,0.0004486884,0.002889345,0.005690918,0.009473719,0.001465578,0.005980514,0.004295611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01238666,0.00047882,0.0003942581,0.00381787,0.0288995,0.005988334,0.003357311,0.007852827,0.0009632127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02454488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02953263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4492261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4751486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935536,0.0009301329,0.0005644673,0.000627252,0.00370045,0.0006241146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959309,0.001628425,0.0008346168,0.0003739988,0.0008528067,0.000379332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001594417,0.00001648871,0.0008516771,0.000207543,0.000004616792,0.0006152777,0.008553958,0.0002039033,0.0004037343,0.9162019,0.02569591,0.04722913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009478903,0.00002999829,0.005893636,0.001205596,0.00001011433,0.0004982679,0.004009516,0.000207314,0.0002524524,0.1096734,0.8781461,0.00006415603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02169112,0.04953639,0.008074502,0.07168703,0.002966689,0.0002772046,0.0004283574,0.0001002303,0.8452386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.590123,0.07531862,0.02356158,0.02946633,0.001904652,0.0008127367,0.0007339609,0.0001957611,0.2778834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4492261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044136967","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i1.5855","title":"Recent Developments in the Law of Equitable Remedies: What Canada Can Do For You","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Supreme court; Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jeff Berryman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04301465892440598,"gpt":0.265935077593592,"spread":0.222920418669186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005574428,0.000473687,0.0007049449,0.002342176,0.01070494,0.01218141,0.00214896,0.009488679,0.006086527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01801621,0.000379198,0.0004780169,0.003968138,0.02074557,0.005987534,0.002231368,0.01091162,0.0005215776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06335381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1176636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9453819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9646291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907836,0.0009058269,0.0002467124,0.0006832723,0.005529639,0.001851021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873974,0.003782731,0.0005706298,0.0004616896,0.006364154,0.001423345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001173732,0.00001376974,0.0004792869,0.0001808764,0.000009623378,0.00009828951,0.000744177,0.0004104217,0.0001094256,0.8781601,0.08046161,0.03932064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001376409,0.000013829,0.002508855,0.000737761,0.00002879617,0.0001066857,0.001036388,0.0004489389,0.0001916608,0.1315582,0.8632819,0.0000731879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004815043,0.1788471,0.002807769,0.6364638,0.002614392,0.00002248412,0.000174059,0.00006278715,0.1741926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.320782,0.2928585,0.007015234,0.2695408,0.005176193,0.00004898706,0.0001932722,0.0001108702,0.1042743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06335381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4596662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141257998","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5516","title":"Democratising or Demonising the World Heritage Convention?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Treaty; Political science; Legitimacy; Democratic legitimacy; Democracy; Sovereignty; Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Politics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Affolder","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0668074836086298,"gpt":0.2505777495386732,"spread":0.1837702659300434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01914421,0.0002689612,0.0003738216,0.0008837891,0.006985874,0.01278393,0.001210722,0.006657538,0.007311124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02663444,0.0002915087,0.0004301811,0.001284263,0.01995216,0.01584094,0.005677123,0.008881079,0.001106532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007359281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01444981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0170231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02130705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985386,0.008293248,0.0004819452,0.001499391,0.00215503,0.002184314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915892,0.004762631,0.001118132,0.001178782,0.0007701443,0.0005810683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006019562,0.00001091262,0.0001863422,0.00002632671,0.000002644815,0.00003621581,0.002472081,0.000138882,0.0001127099,0.9849851,0.005345127,0.006677593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003008812,0.00002985984,0.0008665611,0.0003193167,0.00001289544,0.000103752,0.005457411,0.0004146951,0.0005302787,0.5752892,0.4169039,0.00004196008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04030221,0.007497426,0.01229468,0.3298434,0.001821769,0.0001077157,0.00005838311,0.0001157494,0.6079586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8944445,0.004101991,0.004686723,0.04521511,0.00115385,0.0001446536,0.00005611271,0.0001513307,0.0500458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01914421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1012455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910877383","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i3.5327","title":"Litigating Climate Change – Of Politics and Political Questions: A Comparative Analysis of Justiciability of Climate Change in the United States and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Political question; Political science; Politics; Law; Context (archaeology); Climate change; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Inura Fernando","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03288232814075758,"gpt":0.270340585075876,"spread":0.2374582569351184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004027408,0.0001782083,0.0007466652,0.00395907,0.01744436,0.01157846,0.001695455,0.002261068,0.004055441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01740739,0.0003001896,0.0005966534,0.007988237,0.01103468,0.002236455,0.003478996,0.003165416,0.0001354376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1308039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1924323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974455,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895251,0.001117957,0.0001885454,0.0004430258,0.004974614,0.003750782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881504,0.004105379,0.0006814752,0.0002487314,0.005503698,0.00131043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001505087,0.0001211364,0.04851248,0.000365411,0.0002415608,0.001057618,0.05174262,0.003867573,0.0008465327,0.8283914,0.02524651,0.03945652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001152445,0.00007975018,0.373128,0.001203595,0.0005458359,0.0004406084,0.1665761,0.00450337,0.001134397,0.05729564,0.3946362,0.0003412319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4689228,0.01637622,0.001115678,0.02673292,0.0001661139,0.0001133785,0.0003984402,0.00002439644,0.4861501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874389,0.00440161,0.0002100435,0.001946531,0.00002179832,0.00001676378,0.0001057109,0.00001312116,0.005845665],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1308039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.949053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604885731","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v48i2.4743","title":"Law School as Social Innovation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; New Zealand Law Foundation","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Mandate; Project commissioning; Legal education; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Publishing; Public relations; Resilience (materials science); Sociology; Law; Social science; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Lorne Sossin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05594210053858727,"gpt":0.2648109310513972,"spread":0.2088688305128099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005474467,0.0002485662,0.0004026491,0.001690587,0.006839238,0.01142681,0.001114083,0.004432067,0.01190701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006275951,0.0001909322,0.000355705,0.001560104,0.02906748,0.008213593,0.009223831,0.003878072,0.001127164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01113028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01692991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01154208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01545415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943433,0.003174637,0.0001350621,0.0006186069,0.0008186356,0.0009099062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944363,0.002211527,0.0005422485,0.0007941719,0.0007552021,0.001260502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001859669,0.00002290703,0.0001480469,0.00002878193,0.000002400548,0.00002746333,0.001963642,0.0001424042,0.00002261637,0.9813021,0.005467886,0.01086987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001014887,0.00003094337,0.0006381578,0.0001928741,0.000003596215,0.00004235811,0.003447833,0.0003514487,0.00005873039,0.5370581,0.4581568,0.000009027959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02289984,0.01162433,0.009461774,0.1209052,0.001263706,0.0001622682,0.00006582009,0.0001402865,0.8334768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8947489,0.006899927,0.003478606,0.009777479,0.001031412,0.0001865652,0.00005305216,0.00005366595,0.08377036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01190701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08075619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004713773","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v32i3.5870","title":"In Absentia Trials and the Right to Defend: The Incorporation of a European Human Rights Principle into the Dutch Criminial Justice System","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to a fair trial; Law; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Convention; Political science; Project commissioning; Administration of justice; Criminal justice; Publishing","authors":[{"name":"Evert Stamhuis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0451853290645602,"gpt":0.3142188533675821,"spread":0.2690335243030219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0345958,0.0001797496,0.0007289109,0.001740095,0.004580197,0.01302645,0.001765932,0.005696979,0.003118625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06931397,0.0003685831,0.0004564954,0.002426703,0.01718128,0.009546869,0.005671776,0.005018968,0.000314091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01003956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01142103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03763973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06424695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9570468,0.02664361,0.002942408,0.003565174,0.007262921,0.002539195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686756,0.02276017,0.003141467,0.001889872,0.002862594,0.0006701908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002834435,0.000009704293,0.0005682909,0.0001309169,0.00001227956,0.0002630631,0.00340194,0.0001996915,0.0001422499,0.9781578,0.003379151,0.01370657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009985222,0.00009047873,0.007211094,0.001378185,0.00006481572,0.0005457383,0.005522108,0.0005942419,0.0008801459,0.4970955,0.4864414,0.00007646041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.101127,0.06580206,0.02385042,0.1189295,0.001410593,0.0001752621,0.0002269928,0.00002947024,0.6884487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404027,0.008790504,0.002717488,0.0132593,0.0003790668,0.0001491389,0.0000898198,0.00003571198,0.0341763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03763973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1829623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004382415","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i1.5968","title":"Access to Legal Education","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Peter C. Hogg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03313940678100288,"gpt":0.3528028254099387,"spread":0.3196634186289358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002591583,0.0001383501,0.0002471803,0.00133316,0.002877664,0.005193724,0.0007777888,0.004151057,0.1150447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01495058,0.0001746018,0.0003125282,0.001000938,0.003295798,0.005992994,0.008191562,0.002930263,0.004842842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00578452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01228671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01883253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04084797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954177,0.001357417,0.0001026949,0.000414595,0.001201894,0.001505688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905098,0.002551877,0.0005315391,0.0006136999,0.001309141,0.00448384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000328087,0.0001974676,0.003025335,0.0001857488,0.000008534485,0.0002639749,0.003862884,0.0001500967,0.0002492114,0.7487118,0.08976413,0.1535479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002372054,0.00006513853,0.006797204,0.0005685123,0.000006006462,0.0001966906,0.002223219,0.0001876905,0.0001521906,0.07709003,0.9126768,0.00001271153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01975173,0.008104568,0.001286383,0.1001362,0.0008749403,0.00004600432,0.0001599815,0.00004809896,0.8695921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5769134,0.007158102,0.001033,0.02286792,0.001683439,0.00009160573,0.0001741165,0.00004029563,0.3900382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1150447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3848628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977226620","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i4.5628","title":"The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: The Canadian Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Convention; Project commissioning; Law; Preference; Publishing; Political science; Business; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Rajeev Sharma","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03721263206562045,"gpt":0.2965334689502709,"spread":0.2593208368846505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005606417,0.0005276047,0.0006279435,0.003209069,0.0160737,0.01251032,0.001788875,0.004583198,0.008107558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009153473,0.0005122692,0.000382847,0.01099293,0.007393318,0.002499772,0.00190787,0.00498598,0.0007133951],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1434442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2332155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915308,0.0009179184,0.0002346112,0.0005238493,0.004867711,0.001925195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947745,0.001211426,0.0002171511,0.0001577578,0.002792986,0.0008462148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002668929,0.00003180653,0.001311249,0.0001727415,0.00001206686,0.0002736356,0.006239553,0.0004785559,0.0002061654,0.7410491,0.2090018,0.04119655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005640756,0.000006472625,0.002372198,0.0001470222,0.0000081624,0.00005929215,0.002117311,0.0001262979,0.00008882736,0.006267118,0.9887745,0.00002715799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01464543,0.08046572,0.001159207,0.1119146,0.001618072,0.00007572307,0.0007671843,0.0000414762,0.7893126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4359453,0.1246753,0.004132847,0.0368876,0.0005806453,0.0001196324,0.0007064185,0.0001585689,0.3967937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1434442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338978280","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v46i2.4918","title":"The Implications of a Supreme Law Bill Of Rights for New Zealand Judicial Appointments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Commission; Judicial review; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Juliet Bull","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03882758577520705,"gpt":0.2898765720509398,"spread":0.2510489862757327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02279848,0.0002631595,0.0007104764,0.001608153,0.01409263,0.01418377,0.003025722,0.01058295,0.006484134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07440099,0.0008988458,0.001032298,0.001374471,0.01840567,0.005580524,0.004780415,0.0172959,0.0008430813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03724078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05998272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5124191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6636686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9702204,0.006594487,0.002000962,0.003475021,0.01048012,0.007229123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796952,0.00922625,0.00256232,0.00158758,0.004736141,0.002192527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002059163,0.00001788871,0.00098628,0.00003074664,0.000005791415,0.0004803184,0.003698896,0.0002181822,0.0003537428,0.9782358,0.009474914,0.006476864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002278517,0.0001950982,0.02940811,0.0009622906,0.0001008059,0.0008271536,0.009814406,0.002292431,0.0009187137,0.250009,0.7049438,0.0003004212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09892064,0.004524229,0.006789444,0.2747216,0.002313792,0.0004231877,0.0002181791,0.00009383336,0.6119951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541329,0.002581006,0.007975912,0.03811934,0.001096446,0.0002094337,0.00008233634,0.00005659364,0.09574602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5124191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975404603","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v35i1.5632","title":"\"Vexatious and an Abuse of the Process of the Court\": The Assets Company v Mere Roihi Cases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Certainty; Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Bryan Gilling","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0209048045182328,"gpt":0.2892961959220668,"spread":0.268391391403834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007872084,0.0001902638,0.0003510838,0.0008838514,0.01298988,0.008705329,0.001187127,0.01236571,0.001591749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01575012,0.0004651982,0.0003950892,0.0007856307,0.02397314,0.00485908,0.004022431,0.01363886,0.0002432929],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00784833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006834541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06153313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1096179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929579,0.003596721,0.0002157539,0.0006302451,0.001276886,0.001322505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932689,0.005027831,0.0005937675,0.0002904206,0.0004979205,0.0003211271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001137755,0.000007195106,0.0004500634,0.00001633792,0.000003739192,0.0006966318,0.01275492,0.00005227639,0.0001575738,0.9701481,0.01284998,0.0028518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008785853,0.00009528871,0.008820939,0.001004069,0.00007915276,0.002369796,0.03255572,0.001364592,0.002323816,0.3316218,0.6195071,0.0001698739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1636434,0.008080686,0.004573733,0.2598243,0.0009036209,0.00007993823,0.0000600128,0.0000389745,0.5627953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921943,0.001395065,0.000699756,0.04253845,0.0004848982,0.00006664645,0.00001211253,0.00001800488,0.03284211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06153313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1223499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410144503","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v55i2.9803","title":"Navigating Towards an Airworthy Protection Regime for New Zealand's Airline Passengers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Advertising; Political science; Publishing; Aeronautics; Business; Media studies; Engineering; Sociology; Law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0201092840442501,"gpt":0.3006136679215246,"spread":0.2805043838772744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004630929,0.0002884166,0.0002646132,0.0007815414,0.004704366,0.009354574,0.001732819,0.00691733,0.004780301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008010149,0.0004419667,0.0007439357,0.000405283,0.008022442,0.005581328,0.003145616,0.005745083,0.000599701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01289153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0326054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5317231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5233144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959305,0.0004722974,0.0002816526,0.0005972716,0.001812329,0.000906036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964593,0.0005484949,0.000764485,0.0003466222,0.001330361,0.0005505939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009258229,0.0002710298,0.01748896,0.0003597139,0.00004084686,0.003317429,0.03223217,0.001940186,0.0177893,0.8364314,0.03067982,0.0593565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001790667,0.00045773,0.04869034,0.001259652,0.00007241229,0.001399298,0.01456297,0.003245571,0.002728679,0.06703958,0.8601142,0.0002505402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4341331,0.004307279,0.01528461,0.1650692,0.0008389901,0.0005477248,0.0001594083,0.0001806893,0.3794789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8707838,0.003380646,0.01448724,0.0246346,0.0004186104,0.0001981937,0.00009034102,0.00004870122,0.08595782],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5317231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9420693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W822600774","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v44i3/4.4982","title":"Māui And The People Of The North","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Carwyn Jones","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006742660316217058,"gpt":0.2004731846231281,"spread":0.193730524306911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002060731,0.0002437487,0.0004128324,0.00140718,0.01139138,0.004668325,0.000833521,0.001471843,0.005292282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003938275,0.0002269215,0.0001721154,0.001848499,0.007868472,0.004514051,0.004338456,0.002452644,0.0004875917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01062342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01368529,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2390965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980045,0.0009992324,0.00004640753,0.0001305293,0.0002863559,0.0005329321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985368,0.0007748606,0.0001662571,0.00007933872,0.0002265754,0.0002161952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006173746,0.00003607549,0.006612992,0.001473216,0.00004745151,0.00181769,0.3600254,0.00006414044,0.0006342491,0.424483,0.1138305,0.09091363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005140671,0.0000189792,0.008188965,0.0009477784,0.00001713503,0.000357254,0.1025322,0.00001505062,0.0001040946,0.008529574,0.8792683,0.00001555664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09196696,0.3141174,0.0003890253,0.1900597,0.00231453,0.00004277208,0.0001040006,0.00003463548,0.400971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7962528,0.07869498,0.0003612892,0.02630858,0.0007280459,0.0001807388,0.00006874523,0.00003095716,0.09737397],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2390965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4754095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976279444","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5529","title":"Using Human Rights Treaties to Resolve Ambiguity: the Advent of A Rights-Conscious Charming Betsy Canon","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Dualism; International human rights law; Political science; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Immigration; Common law; Fundamental rights; Sociology; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Melissa A. Waters","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03278274552012431,"gpt":0.3137602957655722,"spread":0.2809775502454479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02488468,0.0003428825,0.0005593741,0.001812988,0.01196894,0.01378231,0.001703242,0.008953334,0.00277869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02640898,0.0005215975,0.0005249667,0.001438595,0.05687336,0.01259124,0.009109004,0.01473954,0.0003350168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01085571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01187249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02226554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04171109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.979013,0.01417741,0.000360774,0.001262628,0.00372789,0.001458415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824241,0.01411789,0.0008440331,0.001099037,0.000999401,0.0005154947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002227956,0.000003661087,0.00004224374,0.00001127983,0.000001471479,0.00005742508,0.007047681,0.0001003781,0.00004200135,0.9870625,0.001935487,0.00369364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002078631,0.00001895581,0.0002381187,0.0002435911,0.000009505492,0.00009636512,0.005656115,0.0007374706,0.000320304,0.7220445,0.2705801,0.00003415227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04569866,0.009868867,0.03032601,0.211119,0.001736237,0.00006014246,0.00001482619,0.00006425828,0.7011119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9148724,0.003267805,0.007595991,0.02563642,0.0009683336,0.00009345327,0.00000837159,0.00008779624,0.0474694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02488468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1316043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585351093","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i1.5048","title":"The Privy Council as the Final Court for the British Empire","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Empire; Section (typography); Work (physics); High Court; Engineering; Business","authors":[{"name":"Ivor Richardson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0528867023335188,"gpt":0.2841634866868282,"spread":0.2312767843533094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00569666,0.0001398045,0.0003449507,0.001190819,0.01263458,0.01319902,0.0009244811,0.005925615,0.004839029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01687838,0.000567703,0.000230295,0.002059853,0.007385344,0.002582336,0.002089599,0.00725071,0.0007543241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02198478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02694395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5271162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7822551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990568,0.002705751,0.0003455404,0.0009863154,0.002722638,0.002671761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930607,0.002436478,0.0003887889,0.0004781152,0.002382777,0.001253127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005814213,0.00002576076,0.004258687,0.0000801956,0.00001697809,0.0006015114,0.005903665,0.0005924056,0.0006332455,0.8787327,0.09266523,0.01643152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005572625,0.00007788705,0.02611334,0.0004217,0.00006537465,0.0003665576,0.008999107,0.001116871,0.0009254699,0.03857166,0.9231517,0.0001345263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1950265,0.01323693,0.003055314,0.1061962,0.00160389,0.0001083964,0.000382776,0.0001204567,0.6802695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789144,0.001642326,0.001067198,0.009130921,0.0001681171,0.00003029346,0.00008214913,0.00006432678,0.1089001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5271162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9513375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201809459","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v40i1.5396","title":"Book Review: Human Rights in the South Pacific – Challenges and Changes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Harwood","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0224175806053055,"gpt":0.2528157274758621,"spread":0.2303981468705566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001271696,0.0007489563,0.001013722,0.002405687,0.00125549,0.00330591,0.001174932,0.002060576,0.02695128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00429119,0.0003815077,0.0003264143,0.005709493,0.001540685,0.003338373,0.001028008,0.003656544,0.01148948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00387568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009935312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02373763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05277034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998832,0.0002316414,0.00005770847,0.00009456444,0.0007167844,0.00006717924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962807,0.001342688,0.0002339769,0.00007609403,0.001844058,0.0002224382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003423343,0.000005471623,0.00002843107,0.0006434412,0.000004629539,0.00002280463,0.0001124339,0.00006014864,0.00002906854,0.003340679,0.9623964,0.03335295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002505202,0.000004777709,0.0001656095,0.0009390996,0.000004014204,0.00005773604,0.0001392258,0.00001627423,0.00001536089,0.0008218257,0.9978293,0.000004368812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000316885,0.8016436,0.0004298377,0.06542742,0.02878101,0.00007246294,0.0001794542,0.00005597233,0.1030934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003559674,0.7877046,0.0005245759,0.02124906,0.01133683,0.00009651056,0.000235225,0.00006904794,0.1752244],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02695128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09016103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950114440","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v48i3.4735","title":"Fiducia in Public Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Private law; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Public law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Duty; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Lindsay Breach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0487478028784544,"gpt":0.3028021202820408,"spread":0.2540543174035864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01217244,0.0003470946,0.0006923127,0.003208947,0.006846199,0.01058,0.001642821,0.00877423,0.005001487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01745131,0.000489125,0.0007898208,0.002465786,0.03123555,0.008731424,0.003961868,0.0110885,0.0009486159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02064072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01917876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06327166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04913804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859147,0.006482431,0.0005207454,0.001275414,0.003850946,0.001955705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991832,0.00463474,0.0006176366,0.0008750398,0.00167613,0.0003644881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.618299e-7,0.000003193901,0.00003676675,0.00001779573,0.000001247488,0.000008693722,0.0002828549,0.00004065841,0.000006737325,0.9938022,0.003183307,0.002615902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000763992,0.00001619535,0.0006235974,0.0006299188,0.000009862109,0.00009330203,0.0008231795,0.0002561822,0.00009599991,0.6234657,0.3739589,0.00001963967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01178091,0.1266422,0.02349663,0.1128941,0.001673337,0.0000846771,0.00008943361,0.00008483083,0.723254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8005231,0.04540847,0.008348593,0.05034329,0.002344447,0.0002255703,0.0001126281,0.0001106457,0.09258326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06327166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1497596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949536135","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v49i4.5333","title":"Foreword: The Dynamic Evolution of International Law – Rise or Decline?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo; Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; New Zealand Law Foundation; National University of Singapore; York University","keywords":"Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Field (mathematics); International law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Campbell McLachlan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01496412606717491,"gpt":0.2810331926632186,"spread":0.2660690665960437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002826619,0.001063266,0.001627407,0.003023646,0.003997568,0.01312354,0.001851566,0.007880699,0.0212626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01649495,0.0006337297,0.0007957785,0.003453484,0.006159983,0.008865156,0.002885845,0.01256087,0.01217998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006743676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007784369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0231468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03221605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967348,0.0007838041,0.0002384584,0.000376847,0.001551762,0.0003142366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905413,0.003807639,0.0007380376,0.0004757577,0.003784315,0.0006529876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004979035,0.000003455299,0.00002787526,0.0001333997,0.000003476175,0.00001028773,0.00009301019,0.00001047942,0.00003692594,0.005252351,0.9896147,0.004809171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004608166,0.000009965494,0.0003514625,0.001021254,0.000009493085,0.00004936169,0.0004452962,0.00002889395,0.00004763757,0.003936296,0.9940841,0.00001159661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004228387,0.1831623,0.0006646368,0.4017324,0.3775161,0.00005903213,0.0003437643,0.00007106829,0.03602784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01503451,0.1527734,0.001035955,0.3099878,0.3742546,0.0001828959,0.0006134116,0.0004322987,0.1456852],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0231468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07113045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975264628","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i3.5612","title":"Book Review: The Constitution of Independence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Commonwealth; Independence (probability theory); Constitutional theory; Nothing; Constitutional law; Law; Historiography; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Caroline Morris","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01358565194224543,"gpt":0.2650917697447398,"spread":0.2515061178024944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007016339,0.0006208056,0.0009483366,0.003097714,0.001272242,0.00343749,0.0008142634,0.001603728,0.0297256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003985078,0.0003558092,0.0003647217,0.005787441,0.001796427,0.002922615,0.0008907659,0.003009022,0.01261937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004615948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008127718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02310461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03629956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987785,0.0002138977,0.00005591878,0.0001394006,0.0007212681,0.00009093807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981145,0.0007120284,0.0001370555,0.00008055956,0.0008362043,0.000119629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005217446,0.000006688142,0.00005177527,0.0005476758,0.000006029299,0.0000214611,0.00008374968,0.00007488768,0.00003299383,0.02073745,0.9299725,0.04845963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001702878,0.000002364568,0.0001787781,0.0004599135,0.000003097038,0.00003547771,0.0000354727,0.000007301562,0.00000826589,0.00159437,0.9976709,0.000002366149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001919479,0.8420228,0.0002805752,0.02041182,0.007175149,0.00001815101,0.0001904371,0.00003751592,0.1296716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006574814,0.823377,0.0004628967,0.01219609,0.007890688,0.00005113121,0.000526297,0.00007761578,0.1488434],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0297256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09944201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347051369","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v38i2.5519","title":"Hegemonic Federalism: The Democratic Implications of the UN Security Council's \"Legislative\" Phase","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Legislature; Federalism; Public administration; Democracy; Legislation; Hegemony; Government (linguistics); Security council; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Craig Forcese","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03143071278229796,"gpt":0.289482856809323,"spread":0.258052144027025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01017208,0.0001821919,0.0002413487,0.00105871,0.01338197,0.007544927,0.0007142829,0.002680151,0.00223799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01163658,0.0002520141,0.0002784883,0.001045834,0.02375012,0.003971598,0.002693882,0.005825729,0.0001469627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02400054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02392598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1868079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2810687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990908,0.004326106,0.0001457675,0.000621543,0.00215012,0.001848403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963207,0.00204701,0.0002425756,0.0003778613,0.0006402986,0.0003715737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002647869,0.000003298846,0.0001038979,0.000002237944,6.903639e-7,0.00001176927,0.002060642,0.00007304762,0.00002980601,0.9951232,0.001023239,0.001565555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003269271,0.00002598047,0.002875834,0.00008163312,0.00001171902,0.00005683735,0.00667729,0.001596842,0.0003728609,0.8127828,0.1754493,0.00003607957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07160834,0.00162804,0.01670293,0.09836672,0.0005965603,0.00008131318,0.00005254016,0.00006332,0.8109002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796126,0.0004218666,0.002140422,0.004830633,0.000150238,0.00004901905,0.00001580098,0.00001765952,0.01276176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1868079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3714412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210337685","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v52i4.7400","title":"Dissonance between Fact and Law: The Example of Visual Artistic Practice and Income Tax Concessions for Peak Copyright","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Common law copyright; Statute; Legislation; Income tax; Law; Tax law; Fair use; Economics; Common law; Law and economics; Double taxation; Public economics; Political science; Intellectual property; Copyright law","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan Barrett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02690961963721568,"gpt":0.2516297811312664,"spread":0.2247201614940508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005535527,0.0004253523,0.0004714024,0.001588382,0.0179529,0.01107003,0.002085467,0.008387934,0.008162921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01290188,0.0003998663,0.001049227,0.001396917,0.04699422,0.0178957,0.009075779,0.01046895,0.0008335495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009661416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005774423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02808037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03442733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956383,0.00230256,0.00009887137,0.000507997,0.0008077966,0.0006445204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929838,0.004805345,0.0005124779,0.000637665,0.0006876994,0.0003729551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008998309,0.0000131635,0.0001690851,0.000008666002,0.000001867672,0.0002028587,0.007878962,0.00009759644,0.00003939775,0.9878156,0.002126312,0.001637517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005711343,0.00002397393,0.001298864,0.0002474869,0.00001661253,0.0004227092,0.015826,0.001585463,0.0002820207,0.8319441,0.1482591,0.00003662406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.07810368,0.002726788,0.01404278,0.05635893,0.0004560013,0.00005276991,0.00005811109,0.00004288952,0.8481581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537559,0.00117424,0.004024683,0.004158913,0.0002220863,0.00006521738,0.00002731211,0.00005915473,0.03651254],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02808037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07009882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624364408","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5945","title":"Search for Principle - The Government's Liability in Negligence for the Careless Exercise of its Statutory Powers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Project commissioning; Liability; Government (linguistics); Law; Publishing; Business; Strict liability; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Geuther","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02710318604166993,"gpt":0.3033416156082833,"spread":0.2762384295666134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01665229,0.0003527911,0.0009326959,0.001868718,0.00482003,0.005801685,0.002053224,0.008967804,0.002693986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01950476,0.0005751613,0.00120843,0.0009602815,0.03520915,0.006940669,0.00349217,0.01262479,0.0007768124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009758228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01939761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01283372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01375857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902055,0.003437031,0.0005415236,0.001234476,0.003708427,0.0008730072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897424,0.006262132,0.0008792835,0.0009831312,0.001758061,0.0003750248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001997799,0.000008465424,0.00007669424,0.00001766296,0.000002739597,0.00003398146,0.000402161,0.0001093727,0.00005258571,0.9963174,0.001754044,0.001222934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001472301,0.0000151572,0.000287675,0.0001125225,0.000006455938,0.0001003391,0.000310781,0.0004240784,0.0001227495,0.9759876,0.02260715,0.00001088424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03826091,0.01031254,0.07634649,0.2924042,0.001145777,0.0003128959,0.0002215796,0.0001207271,0.580875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8964766,0.003293558,0.03795451,0.03216327,0.001182371,0.0003208242,0.00007101227,0.00004474333,0.0284931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01665229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08806676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}