{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"50015c071779","filters":{"venue":"WORD Structure"}},"results":[{"id":"W2111042112","doi":"10.3366/word.2011.0009","title":"Principles of affix ordering: An overview","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WORD Structure","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affix; Linguistics; Focus (optics); Word formation; Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Word order; Root (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09742024920509669,"gpt":0.2658985894333245,"spread":0.1684783402282278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006362472,0.0001205909,0.0001742033,0.00005652163,0.00009652825,0.00003540155,0.0001774806,0.000051101,0.005444665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009375564,0.0001022789,0.00004177852,0.00002756372,0.0000884771,0.00009067683,0.00003788608,0.00008635526,0.00001058379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001258368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002506459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007275032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004243026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992947,0.00002705071,0.0002365114,0.0001608006,0.0001407074,0.0001402538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993657,0.00001676743,0.0001580443,0.0002866463,0.0001315614,0.00004122192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001197075,0.00002703881,0.000644773,0.00006585671,0.00002466637,0.00000193724,0.0571942,0.000004915449,0.0001018761,0.9402439,0.00001432827,0.001664559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008215947,0.0003689085,0.05168841,0.0002480988,0.0002165785,0.00001298508,0.01335802,0.00055142,0.004120028,0.7595445,0.1682242,0.000845201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439842,0.000293028,0.0001090288,0.0003998557,0.002241032,0.0002278464,0.00009732418,0.0001364683,0.05251119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952257,0.00001222913,0.003242502,0.0000503322,0.0006612109,0.000001909668,0.00002130736,0.00002020382,0.000764585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1806994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094700626","doi":"10.3366/word.2010.0006","title":"Meaning predictability and compound interpretation: A psycholinguistic investigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WORD Structure","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Predictability; Meaning (existential); Nonsense; Interpretation (philosophy); Task (project management); Comprehension; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Psycholinguistics; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Psychology; Computer science; Cognition; Mathematics; Statistics; Philosophy; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0140916978579148,"gpt":0.2745220134938467,"spread":0.2604303156359319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008413305,0.0001136663,0.0001083561,0.00004382282,0.0001459678,0.00005406008,0.000139854,0.00009810691,0.0001044129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001206913,0.00009383459,0.00002098935,0.0001102711,0.0003377251,0.00007291866,0.00004188783,0.0004315556,0.000003034535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005114932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002089992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009348681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001268721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991609,0.00007844719,0.0001530903,0.0003695335,0.00009741136,0.0001405645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994239,0.0001830181,0.000071594,0.00021721,0.00003012682,0.00007416042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003191627,0.000005991855,0.003806611,0.00002203745,0.000001994666,0.00007722326,0.003745409,0.00000275921,0.9875202,0.001629981,0.00007007158,0.003085782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002400375,0.0003617524,0.06332645,0.0001233901,0.0001118844,0.008306768,0.0005534615,0.003663148,0.6009064,0.309657,0.00926617,0.001323237],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971037,0.00001493839,0.00002568419,0.0002509742,0.001056912,0.0001324468,0.00002030468,0.0000892891,0.001305773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974023,0.000001754613,0.0008754371,0.001404557,0.0002571985,0.000002420584,0.000006880355,0.000008850893,0.00004056872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3866138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3826464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094646142","doi":"10.3366/e1750124510000504","title":"Pavol Štekauer, <i>Meaning predictability in word formation</i>. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2005. xxii + 263pp. ISBN 90-272-1563-4.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WORD Structure","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Predictability; Word (group theory); Meaning (existential); Word formation; Philosophy; Humanities; Mathematics; Epistemology; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007726530795244653,"gpt":0.2477340681247633,"spread":0.2400075373295187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003711934,0.0003841148,0.0004159274,0.0001896895,0.0002492546,0.0001040175,0.0003163926,0.0005475677,0.001940698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001101952,0.0003448822,0.00007808308,0.0002915128,0.0001715039,0.0002765676,0.0001620013,0.001939576,0.00005157113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006373938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005978243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006740796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001740061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976091,0.000124262,0.0005893772,0.0007070918,0.0003004955,0.0006696859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988744,0.000117188,0.0002056293,0.0005354619,0.00005618791,0.0002110912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009932386,0.0004732606,0.647299,0.0003955693,0.0002592425,0.0001670443,0.05851259,0.00005955591,0.01897286,0.01779149,0.05471088,0.2003653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001709768,0.00007167261,0.8619142,0.00008519468,0.00002617144,0.000139236,0.001198859,0.00007746261,0.0001725703,0.002934771,0.1311655,0.0005045137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888428,0.0004906336,0.00004956405,0.002943853,0.001522109,0.000502964,0.00008078139,0.0001653475,0.005401876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964008,0.00002907452,0.001496347,0.0007337788,0.0005389657,0.00002642388,0.0001019646,0.0000431833,0.0006295007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2146153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}