{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":6,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"295299c1c255","filters":{"venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri"}},"results":[{"id":"W2198389808","doi":"","title":"Corporate Criminal Liability: A Paradox of Hope","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate liability; Mens rea; Strict liability; Legislature; Law; Criminal law; Commonwealth; Liability; Doctrine; Political science; Common law; Corporation; Limited liability partnership; Law and economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Rebecca Rose","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03941737417569854,"gpt":0.2609308072651153,"spread":0.2215134330894168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01223627,0.0002526086,0.0006871167,0.00203831,0.007887491,0.01138589,0.001628615,0.008028975,0.006896081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02435458,0.0004278712,0.0006032248,0.001599236,0.04093419,0.01417097,0.006904437,0.01392502,0.0008120968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01029641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007688627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01071167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01245407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953674,0.001326321,0.0001479832,0.000685955,0.001798038,0.0006743495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851232,0.009405373,0.001103002,0.001171551,0.001466101,0.001730775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006806201,0.00001305158,0.0001633499,0.00001707712,0.000001952894,0.00005218697,0.001042883,0.00005866162,0.00002639338,0.989674,0.005050916,0.003892765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002922498,0.00001706866,0.0004969208,0.00009611093,0.000004904399,0.0001434608,0.001862983,0.0001917434,0.0000571672,0.9132551,0.08383187,0.00001338765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03185832,0.01435334,0.005470207,0.6485309,0.0007632183,0.00002597469,0.0000747158,0.00004377136,0.2988795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112102,0.007344767,0.00156264,0.05996677,0.002420125,0.00006433205,0.00004130072,0.0000448389,0.01734506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01223627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07470602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242657706","doi":"","title":"Improving New Zealand's prosecution system: A practical reform proposal to avoid miscarriages of justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Misconduct; Criminal justice; Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Power (physics); Miscarriage; Quality (philosophy); Business; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nigel Stone","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04270603438513282,"gpt":0.3644047792279266,"spread":0.3216987448427938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0329316,0.0008991259,0.0009633019,0.003992961,0.006066178,0.00832284,0.006841558,0.01792097,0.007354288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09348701,0.001082239,0.001462613,0.001420785,0.008149103,0.007931801,0.008092111,0.00680139,0.001494021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01826815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1155445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2346706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2572332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9697706,0.0096172,0.002657494,0.002611999,0.01008614,0.005256527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950731,0.01111262,0.005046506,0.00418045,0.01920261,0.009726793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004658135,0.002504272,0.01671058,0.003300437,0.0003667555,0.005302371,0.01433875,0.01434675,0.00990518,0.3278249,0.242322,0.3626122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003406476,0.003792105,0.0706548,0.003024863,0.000592811,0.003395967,0.009389697,0.01529772,0.00337352,0.05658849,0.8296703,0.0008132327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05638483,0.003997906,0.03219257,0.8291426,0.003931831,0.006171767,0.0002490068,0.0008064858,0.06712312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.496573,0.006725952,0.1793317,0.237021,0.005005659,0.005045696,0.0004779251,0.0001588769,0.06966019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2346706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4666093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767083539","doi":"","title":"Equality Under Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Bill of rights; Multiculturalism; Common law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Dame Sian Elias","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06927528886844081,"gpt":0.3748484252067238,"spread":0.305573136338283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007181066,0.0003397749,0.0008624324,0.001284024,0.006195614,0.009057391,0.001173482,0.004805536,0.01106834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01555488,0.0003176771,0.0004677164,0.001077377,0.02512636,0.008013631,0.005280861,0.004643463,0.001569613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008946965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0194116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06721721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05485724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9841061,0.00489037,0.0007521202,0.002134836,0.00565228,0.002464266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958198,0.001396391,0.0005215603,0.0006760494,0.001140725,0.0004454054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003159589,0.000006117643,0.0001446717,0.00004480366,0.000003729984,0.00002736463,0.001930425,0.00003160916,0.00006466441,0.9797692,0.007941956,0.01003227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009839677,0.00002600249,0.001644561,0.0004593782,0.00001183656,0.0001172765,0.002415715,0.00005562284,0.0001257026,0.3699186,0.6252003,0.00001523819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00542808,0.01204779,0.00360817,0.02497881,0.0006728579,0.00008578495,0.00008474608,0.00001601031,0.9530777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6753874,0.0206116,0.00469441,0.0372505,0.001465686,0.0003781034,0.000235459,0.00006986923,0.2599069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06721721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1336519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203824065","doi":"","title":"Indigenous peoples: Negotiating constitutional reconciliation and legitimacy in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Indigenous; Political science; Law; Negotiation; Duty; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Paul Lah Chartrand","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04505518199907934,"gpt":0.283898263497561,"spread":0.2388430814984816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100149,0.0002670784,0.0005692987,0.003017786,0.02848045,0.01270723,0.003166448,0.004253583,0.005909982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02570343,0.000415473,0.000348586,0.003508131,0.02194335,0.003094595,0.008308809,0.005436954,0.0002277107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1334261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2765396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877808,0.002286419,0.0003249674,0.0008454944,0.004682108,0.004080193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896306,0.004812394,0.0005612469,0.0004378718,0.003343386,0.001214515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002368301,0.00002306296,0.003569337,0.00007768057,0.0000270551,0.0008497305,0.04679474,0.0008674928,0.0003288166,0.9187782,0.007960121,0.02069996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001434559,0.00004972985,0.02011778,0.0007753202,0.0002076014,0.0004583673,0.1004336,0.005077469,0.001497969,0.2797352,0.5912386,0.0002648818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2580135,0.006068772,0.004775827,0.05201377,0.0002349536,0.0001881008,0.0001261496,0.00008160847,0.6784972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805588,0.001427307,0.001225143,0.001682401,0.00002736635,0.00003158562,0.00002416765,0.000018008,0.01500512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1334261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9680787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257952031","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Duties of the Crown to Maori: Will the Canadian Remedy Travel?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Indigenous; Duty; Context (archaeology); Law; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Alex Frame","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0226889056524765,"gpt":0.302796489152118,"spread":0.2801075834996415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001730841,0.0001769546,0.0003106354,0.0009305589,0.01193669,0.006275853,0.00127764,0.004740738,0.004596725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006272942,0.0001799219,0.0002380378,0.001469992,0.01145977,0.002875354,0.001568682,0.003495552,0.0002958107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05190941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09004769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9719576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980429,0.0002099367,0.00003457693,0.0001555492,0.0007388997,0.0008180302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983616,0.0004723073,0.0001562462,0.00007042957,0.0006870959,0.0002522411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001610181,0.00001116849,0.00193499,0.00008468099,0.00000782704,0.0002661782,0.007141141,0.0001989469,0.0002974685,0.9357238,0.02656247,0.02775526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003654232,0.00005730916,0.02507736,0.000716766,0.00007260493,0.0004903603,0.03926431,0.001253712,0.0007397249,0.1949454,0.7372179,0.0001279864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1109931,0.03138502,0.002491892,0.3101312,0.0006926841,0.00007249446,0.0002090017,0.00004359338,0.5439811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8855844,0.0121713,0.001497412,0.016227,0.0002104234,0.00002438441,0.00003522678,0.00001854141,0.08423129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05190941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3766308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214544630","doi":"","title":"The First Four Years: New Zealand's Personal Property Securities Act in Practice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law and economics; Law; Property (philosophy); Personal property; Business; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Gibbons","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02486835254233533,"gpt":0.2449345610198579,"spread":0.2200662084775225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005188617,0.0003263119,0.0004036833,0.001537274,0.004706373,0.007136472,0.001159393,0.004515392,0.004639232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01421805,0.0005187174,0.0005450021,0.00239403,0.007852243,0.004568167,0.002903782,0.006003715,0.0007503265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02046696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02722145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.529878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6065395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942504,0.0008058724,0.0005021336,0.000422723,0.003199413,0.0008193917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959859,0.001262663,0.0007208652,0.0004882633,0.001002094,0.0005402805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005773029,0.00009271915,0.009856184,0.0004423388,0.00002360055,0.002640848,0.04167846,0.0004976164,0.001342323,0.806236,0.06061879,0.07651344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002344783,0.0001301076,0.04260365,0.0005032393,0.00002313599,0.0008490329,0.009623797,0.0004406481,0.0005602487,0.01393626,0.9312385,0.00006793167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1413696,0.02154844,0.003165206,0.06418294,0.002352005,0.000401126,0.0004683658,0.0001117958,0.7664005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7070785,0.01314049,0.002415378,0.01918832,0.0005319228,0.0003139277,0.0003100769,0.00005382242,0.2569675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.529878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9457814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}