{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":160,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":160,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"9ec6b84e2c09","filters":{"venue":"Wildlife Research"}},"results":[{"id":"W2007640618","doi":"10.1071/wr02028","title":"How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Threatened species; Selection (genetic algorithm); Wildlife conservation; Ecological trap; Wildlife management; Wildlife; Foraging; Umbrella species; Biodiversity; Allee effect; Population; Metapopulation; Conservation biology; Optimal foraging theory; Biological dispersal; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02811385136526079,"gpt":0.2843409017106272,"spread":0.2562270503453664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001609346,0.0001317095,0.0001620161,0.0001768466,0.000365656,0.00007146464,0.0001804606,0.0001042832,0.0001100207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004015985,0.0001288074,0.00002853431,0.001001651,0.0004784846,0.000276588,0.0001485475,0.0002113802,0.00007329539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001316252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003905014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002367955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00161998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979341,0.0004572715,0.0002071652,0.00039846,0.0005723771,0.0004306386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992306,0.0002522758,0.00006387143,0.0002322837,0.0000660714,0.000154959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005321562,0.00005739998,0.9203461,0.00004480697,0.00002269687,0.00000203099,0.0003417747,0.00004818619,0.0004125891,0.03069689,0.04558742,0.002386939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005787182,0.0003714455,0.8374884,0.00004923178,0.00001738179,0.00001314613,0.001448295,0.0002128401,0.0004762973,0.02291725,0.1361814,0.0002456399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508803,0.00004003814,0.0008974884,0.03735705,0.00007877134,0.0008281211,0.000005203193,0.00003666799,0.009876295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906095,0.0002109117,0.002021366,0.002709095,0.00002905292,0.0001634289,0.00000554218,0.00001704207,0.004234016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09059393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5252615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108997345","doi":"10.1071/wr08069","title":"Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Vulpes; Transect; Wildlife; Biology; Wildlife management; Zoology; Marten; Wildlife conservation; Microsatellite; Ecology; Habitat; Predation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2008969710332779,"gpt":0.4791123460968686,"spread":0.2782153750635907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003472984,0.0001241067,0.0002562483,0.0001183318,0.0006163127,0.00005155136,0.0003170166,0.00008034916,0.0002736516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006869219,0.00009296763,0.00003615328,0.0008447355,0.0003434067,0.0001397166,0.000301636,0.0003623974,0.00002780491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001300533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003691556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007546608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003343781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970291,0.001402123,0.0003303073,0.0003670283,0.0004637016,0.0004077754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984773,0.0008540199,0.00007155577,0.0004333647,0.00004751188,0.0001162466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001533578,0.000291115,0.954342,0.00000982985,0.00002922127,0.0001461478,0.008018361,0.0008496256,0.004855528,0.00003014303,0.003841461,0.02743318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005422136,0.001567773,0.9632283,0.00002725822,0.00003580943,0.0001893836,0.02110685,0.00908039,0.0005586512,0.000656506,0.002811015,0.0001958304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941114,0.0001052199,0.001836558,0.002394099,0.0000381914,0.0008897628,0.00000134894,0.00001742564,0.0006060328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991169,0.000008193009,0.0081238,0.0004322824,0.00003636582,0.0000264867,4.315978e-7,0.000008656073,0.0001947998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02723735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4740241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132388284","doi":"10.1071/wr10177","title":"A review of the effects of different marking and tagging techniques on marine mammals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Aquarium; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Wildlife; Biology; Ecology; Psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08217227647345204,"gpt":0.3731076315736664,"spread":0.2909353551002143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002028892,0.0003381834,0.001569813,0.0001009546,0.0001291143,0.00001037473,0.0009074394,0.0001269748,0.0006354011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001092734,0.0001866503,0.0003415188,0.0006395525,0.0005465448,0.00003605509,0.005654646,0.000707334,0.00002909299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002037397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003136596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009436146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007685802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964607,0.00110479,0.0006545997,0.0004847987,0.0008535659,0.0004415793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976276,0.001030847,0.0004086016,0.000809918,0.00003227586,0.00009073603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003106687,0.00005541858,0.001222079,0.2253522,0.00004199064,0.000002403136,0.000009172401,8.102238e-10,9.739147e-7,0.0001240807,0.00540301,0.7677856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003438439,0.0001739916,0.001686937,0.208106,0.0001157974,0.00000586876,0.000001040378,1.632585e-7,0.00001175135,0.00006624355,0.7896702,0.0001275842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006479016,0.9690182,3.229313e-7,0.00007812738,0.00003641249,0.002485758,0.000005141737,0.00001396934,0.0282973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00003549126,0.9988366,0.0000723248,0.0002698741,0.00003731886,0.0002999406,0.000002330764,0.00003903906,0.0004070966],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7842672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7611377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105873807","doi":"10.1071/wr09046","title":"Predator-baiting experiments for the conservation of rock-wallabies in Western Australia: a 25-year review with recent advances","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Marsupial; Biology; Endangered species; Ecology; Predator; Threatened species; Wildlife management; Fauna; Wildlife; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1720897420847812,"gpt":0.4347911918052721,"spread":0.262701449720491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002964948,0.0002839378,0.0008633237,0.000105402,0.0002431742,0.0000346972,0.0007365925,0.0002933397,0.0004477428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007488722,0.0001811611,0.0001171969,0.0008475715,0.0003921535,0.0002950047,0.0002629496,0.0008829863,0.0001336304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002299359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002380358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001684173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009678702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968438,0.0005655704,0.0007694299,0.000540571,0.0007460892,0.0005345915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975023,0.001271952,0.000452255,0.000579852,0.0001150546,0.00007858306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001138447,0.0002777439,0.1986742,0.02493205,0.0001293965,0.000007510639,0.0002561475,0.00002249303,0.000002691841,0.0001670958,0.01958251,0.7558343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002582729,0.0001449256,0.003605709,0.01216222,0.00009270838,0.000007761459,0.00006700911,0.00001052448,0.00000159598,0.0000306112,0.9834332,0.0001854085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001237386,0.9924841,0.00002610294,0.001919719,0.000105407,0.003961982,0.00003118836,0.00001484851,0.0002192916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000764745,0.9962804,0.0003064918,0.0003327483,0.00007648725,0.001992609,0.00006590521,0.00003442515,0.0008345005],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9638507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7387536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003349472","doi":"10.1071/wr03072","title":"Use of infrared digital cameras to investigate the behaviour of cryptic species","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Carnivore; Endangered species; Species complex; National park; Ecology; Geography; Biodiversity; Remote sensing; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09926182664020801,"gpt":0.3084993459490472,"spread":0.2092375193088392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005552548,0.00007973083,0.0001282046,0.00008189098,0.0001484092,0.00004087528,0.000365691,0.00006410958,0.0003375263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009008446,0.00005986429,0.00004278479,0.0006684944,0.001091439,0.0003506248,0.0003486326,0.0002221751,0.0003603753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001075846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008988461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009042106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001221056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985416,0.000109241,0.0002515094,0.0001929214,0.0006042013,0.0003005585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991138,0.0002894322,0.00005961171,0.0003618645,0.00005630924,0.0001189733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003676039,0.00008931342,0.9834999,0.000005364463,0.000009036289,0.000004058326,0.0007224481,0.001998505,0.001379873,0.000742113,0.01127415,0.0002384602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001533796,0.0001962833,0.9905018,0.00002428102,0.00000445453,0.000002383958,0.0002450805,0.00002697652,0.0009857132,0.002285764,0.005506678,0.0000672122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921069,0.000007117762,0.00003661036,0.005572327,0.00003465796,0.0003069127,0.00001589657,0.00001040201,0.001909136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961303,0.00001100557,0.0004138972,0.0006991808,0.00002260336,0.00002536753,0.000004839256,0.000008737305,0.002684024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007001876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4632016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088839846","doi":"10.1071/wr14030","title":"Effects of low-level culling of feral cats in open populations: a case study from the forests of southern Tasmania","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Richmond Hospital","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Culling; CATS; Wildlife management; Context (archaeology); Feral cat; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Felis catus; Demography; Predation; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2137157352475632,"gpt":0.3970402660471859,"spread":0.1833245307996227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002370713,0.00007793584,0.0002035153,0.00006507356,0.00009415572,0.00001336464,0.000553044,0.00006795149,0.00005822691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007365977,0.00005874663,0.00002675257,0.0004943435,0.0002912934,0.0001507147,0.0005879218,0.000209904,0.00004320902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008830375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009441891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1120757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06849805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979233,0.0007729974,0.0003523473,0.0002165254,0.00052108,0.0002137417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987563,0.0006604161,0.0001222766,0.0003334948,0.00006314206,0.00006429732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100059,0.0005665638,0.9888141,0.00001650199,0.00001259609,0.00007086369,0.00858367,0.0007389101,0.0001219066,0.00002422263,0.0005694919,0.0003811339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001135205,0.00021441,0.9875206,0.00005424888,0.000009801708,0.000006318729,0.007876424,0.00124751,0.000100607,0.001770037,0.000007956638,0.00005688597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983022,0.0000387266,0.00002465142,0.0002943557,0.00003670923,0.001183283,0.00002534766,0.000003103662,0.00009167052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994965,0.000001492063,0.0002750103,0.00004862639,0.00001883599,0.00007652448,0.00000640298,0.000008877764,0.00006773385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04357763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9484994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901306901","doi":"10.1071/wr18008","title":"Degrees of population-level susceptibility of Australian terrestrial non-volant mammal species to predation by the introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and feral cat (Felis catus)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Vulpes; Biology; Mammal; Threatened species; Predation; Predator; Ecology; Population; Fauna; Felis; Zoology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07450685067210476,"gpt":0.3308207172384937,"spread":0.2563138665663889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001935069,0.0001313781,0.0002141112,0.00009269522,0.0003258538,0.00003614775,0.0003852347,0.0001351909,0.0004550557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008744906,0.0001012885,0.00003944644,0.0004685668,0.0009274617,0.0002432402,0.0003010733,0.0001915544,0.0000424246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001552026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005379546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01178946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01031613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977008,0.0004108893,0.0004234902,0.0004221194,0.0006541402,0.0003885266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989356,0.0002895358,0.0001237341,0.0004610523,0.00008817414,0.0001019524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003712501,0.00008161804,0.9309927,0.00001269324,0.0000160269,3.926183e-7,0.000923331,0.00005792437,0.01991802,0.00004680708,0.04586504,0.001714252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003938114,0.0003759874,0.994143,0.00001849297,0.000009700168,0.000001856273,0.0002619215,0.000720528,0.002277792,0.0001676266,0.001529873,0.00009938146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905913,0.000004327298,0.00004002691,0.008181118,0.0001413622,0.0006777334,0.00006006701,0.00001058128,0.0002934568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974026,0.000009708473,0.0004949635,0.00008358604,0.0002330692,0.00003262891,0.00007262464,0.000009895494,0.001660905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06315038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990305143","doi":"10.1071/wr09070","title":"Cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes: how large would they have to be?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fraser Health","funders":"University of Otago; Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation","keywords":"Threatened species; Feral cat; Geography; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Rural area; Protected area; Population; Endangered species; Ecology; Habitat; Predation; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02941831063923507,"gpt":0.3055723004317067,"spread":0.2761539897924717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001792779,0.000123273,0.0001425686,0.0001529832,0.000363491,0.00008637723,0.0003138062,0.0002848255,0.0005094833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004206008,0.0001073865,0.00002450053,0.0002234093,0.0001418949,0.0002344098,0.0006708253,0.0008406473,0.0002964812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008048254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002992596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001164763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03130991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982129,0.0001703038,0.0001416834,0.0003453082,0.0005001245,0.0006296244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992143,0.000215715,0.000026898,0.0003069369,0.00002363974,0.0002125381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004695721,0.00008601402,0.9735702,0.000005967045,0.000002983216,0.0000121337,0.00208397,0.000005045561,0.001337341,0.0004558215,0.02091432,0.0014793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004241724,0.0001016538,0.9278461,0.00001453824,0.000001915981,0.000007533005,0.000993674,0.001086729,0.00003760436,0.0003967802,0.06894687,0.0001424752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638139,0.00001725194,0.00001568055,0.0330006,0.00009613633,0.0003746951,0.000007521463,0.00002528437,0.002648928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945933,0.00003686822,0.0003043542,0.001853225,0.0001103618,0.00007800226,0.000009408609,0.00001460389,0.002999906],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04803255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044106716","doi":"10.1071/wr04037","title":"Movements and home ranges of radio-tracked Crocodylus porosus in the Cambridge Gulf region of Western Australia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Dry season; Juvenile; Home range; Wet season; Geography; Seasonal breeder; Crocodylus; Seasonality; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06719073729639276,"gpt":0.3368331616688021,"spread":0.2696424243724094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001147525,0.00008071862,0.0001639483,0.00009053402,0.0001067039,0.000009716532,0.000306363,0.00005324863,0.00003684515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004766478,0.00006008655,0.00002298799,0.0003141815,0.0008334886,0.0001149972,0.0003004467,0.0001746645,0.00002700984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007259245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007846874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001683488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001880158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986547,0.0001591213,0.000205098,0.0002117527,0.0004544984,0.0003148159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995614,0.0001079087,0.00005789526,0.0002267277,0.00001277013,0.00003330603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006626196,0.0001908907,0.9852169,0.00005664327,0.00002129283,0.00004801786,0.001234318,0.0001000236,0.0002389676,0.0002834874,0.01232123,0.0002219233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009161179,0.0002111874,0.9959909,0.00002875856,0.000004751281,0.000004940254,0.000701431,0.000002630543,0.0001373199,0.0006125781,0.001331169,0.00005817426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940228,0.00005154234,0.00001247925,0.003065976,0.00002594708,0.0004314851,0.000003583633,0.00000435097,0.002381847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981509,0.0003779441,0.00003874367,0.0001954198,0.00001312085,0.00003509485,0.00000201868,0.000005022149,0.001181711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01099006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3071024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122140032","doi":"10.1071/wr08086","title":"Small mammal populations in a eucalypt forest affected by fire and drought. I. Long-term patterns in an era of climate change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; Ian Potter Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Fauna; Mammal; Population; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Biodiversity; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09262782879171857,"gpt":0.3444392687688883,"spread":0.2518114399771697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008098721,0.0001070786,0.000164928,0.0001086582,0.0001124466,0.00002507086,0.0001965205,0.0001446529,0.0001447225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006940813,0.0001082397,0.00001992438,0.0005288917,0.0001516956,0.0003597765,0.0001274187,0.0004113089,0.00002298084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001088684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001306001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002185449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03932377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982989,0.0003448415,0.0002614501,0.0003316612,0.0002685437,0.0004946177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995231,0.00008141116,0.00004996115,0.000222608,0.00001448565,0.0001084521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004878987,0.0003340796,0.9825819,0.00001612979,0.000001271447,0.00002372839,0.000434216,0.00002315807,0.00011054,0.00007870244,0.0001363059,0.01621122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005146988,0.0002817456,0.9959237,0.00007558665,0.000002122282,0.000003625566,0.00004453563,0.002774016,0.000005923225,0.0002585591,0.00001265579,0.0001028615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955613,0.00005144397,0.00001010337,0.003667317,0.00002149246,0.0005175905,0.00001904261,0.00001458052,0.000137111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990349,0.0001940132,0.0001029629,0.0004436399,0.00003364127,0.00007207988,0.00008009377,0.000009119302,0.00002948169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03713832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103538233","doi":"10.1071/wr01074","title":"Beyond population regulation and limitation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Population growth; Population size; Density dependence; Population density; Ecology; Empirical research; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0936369518061008,"gpt":0.3426473384467812,"spread":0.2490103866406805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004002376,0.00004431869,0.00005305011,0.00004210088,0.0003660811,0.00001683206,0.00004808943,0.00005449474,0.001452649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000920131,0.00004039428,0.00001050148,0.0001876471,0.0002033712,0.0001763368,0.0001026674,0.0001177816,0.0009117161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000693331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.424622e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001148765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001395517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991935,0.00009248485,0.00008361761,0.0001719846,0.0002762974,0.0001821381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999764,0.00008522424,0.00001714313,0.00007705254,0.00001193358,0.00004463718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005274422,0.00003569686,0.9654134,0.000002300754,0.00000181531,0.000001371938,0.0003237943,0.00001754605,0.0004632419,0.0007240706,0.01795431,0.01505716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009059423,0.00007014611,0.9934534,0.000002283188,0.000002672007,0.000002335738,0.0000776879,0.001233169,0.000008758792,0.002011177,0.003001597,0.00004616758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815031,0.00006983845,0.00001197997,0.001807139,0.00001916978,0.0001262532,6.964895e-7,0.00001831538,0.01644346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963621,0.00008579806,0.0002769433,0.00009083979,0.00002894133,0.00001544528,0.000005008809,0.000004489661,0.003130465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02803999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041916934","doi":"10.1071/wr11179","title":"Factors influencing the annual risk of bird–window collisions at residential structures in Alberta, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Geography; Residence; Collision; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Hazard; Rural area; Demography; Ecology; Socioeconomics; Biology; Medicine; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03048028711507783,"gpt":0.3087218696499538,"spread":0.278241582534876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009597291,0.000103118,0.0001410468,0.00006756861,0.0004818394,0.000009821143,0.0004380209,0.0001061615,0.001524861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005610231,0.00006598319,0.00003603478,0.0004551612,0.0005390596,0.0002087873,0.0005427207,0.0005121958,0.00007972982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005966944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001800863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8819622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9797564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976369,0.000525895,0.0002266709,0.0001906577,0.0007624841,0.000657403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985443,0.0008847722,0.00006990026,0.0003078787,0.00002144191,0.0001716866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002069456,0.00003076939,0.9917689,0.000002128405,0.000006508561,0.000003117232,0.002159967,0.0002085109,0.0001876264,0.00001814715,0.005480012,0.0001136294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001383179,0.00002655851,0.9949691,0.000004801102,0.000007667349,0.000002109262,0.001943357,0.000003487246,0.000738718,0.00004377386,0.002048641,0.0000734483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987804,0.00003128127,3.885713e-7,0.0003792892,0.0001262594,0.000252037,0.00004494662,0.000005118329,0.000380332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990751,0.00001200089,0.0000135378,0.0000690509,0.00004387434,0.00001418023,0.000002491695,0.00001302534,0.0007567103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09779415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140691215","doi":"10.1071/wr08079","title":"Combining a map-based public survey with an estimation of site occupancy to determine the recent and changing distribution of the koala in New South Wales","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Phascolarctos cinereus; Occupancy; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Wildlife management; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Fauna; Conservation biology; Species distribution; Scale (ratio); Biodiversity; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Biology; Population; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0759408815929056,"gpt":0.3171711830288453,"spread":0.2412303014359397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002366764,0.00006426703,0.0001017148,0.00007533585,0.0001729443,0.0000228735,0.0001994487,0.00004469299,0.0000261334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000520104,0.00004123855,0.00001132217,0.0009957023,0.0001967213,0.0001476167,0.00008710952,0.0001546846,0.0000047866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007348356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009483963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006973681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003065832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984984,0.0005223246,0.0001742472,0.0001751746,0.0003714031,0.000258437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993157,0.0002546221,0.00007450314,0.0002450643,0.00004062489,0.00006943813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001144726,0.00005593002,0.9826736,0.000004704865,0.00000156489,4.330973e-7,0.0007172122,0.001105399,0.00008042951,0.00007305789,0.0001365388,0.0150367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003182189,0.000253786,0.9825393,0.00004602948,0.000002277994,8.009976e-7,0.0001177004,0.01636773,0.0001066806,0.0001415676,0.00005964854,0.00004624917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989916,0.000009570175,0.001004824,0.008650415,0.000012558,0.0003626135,0.00001287325,0.000005695796,0.00002540957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993478,0.000003307689,0.0002180672,0.0003430472,0.000007447728,0.000009569411,0.00003964772,0.000003717212,0.00002736389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01526233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1710806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029438081","doi":"10.1071/wr06075","title":"Tree use by koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) after fire in remnant coastal forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Phascolarctos cinereus; Ecology; Biology; Population; Eucalyptus; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Geography; Forestry; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03139229606173387,"gpt":0.3045463444673274,"spread":0.2731540484055935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002562029,0.0002074004,0.0002111806,0.0001705409,0.0001767207,0.0001382647,0.000483528,0.000120768,0.001055079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001830695,0.000171788,0.00007402726,0.0008497045,0.0003607148,0.0004326821,0.0006891854,0.0005280839,0.0009975717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002049731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002045137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004632571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02218445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962711,0.000180063,0.0003759366,0.0005917153,0.001375575,0.001205607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988183,0.0002648423,0.00003965288,0.0005206561,0.00001908164,0.0003374423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001789602,0.0002384228,0.8356665,0.0000123641,0.0000075599,0.0002561447,0.0001756318,0.00004087349,0.0002867028,0.00002199193,0.1483248,0.01479009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007992329,0.0001383488,0.7569035,0.0000513335,0.000003162073,0.000004606019,0.0001684522,0.000611405,0.00004744568,0.00009236446,0.2409771,0.0002030855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832264,0.0001022495,0.0001361197,0.001996306,0.00007484115,0.0005957515,0.00002291572,0.0000369783,0.01380846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888417,0.0001718231,0.0002151067,0.0007928472,0.0001096036,0.00007191207,0.00002413128,0.00003440732,0.009738541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09265236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033740351","doi":"10.1071/wr12115","title":"Importance of getting the numbers right: quantifying the rapid and substantial decline of an abundant marsupial, Bettongia penicillata","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Colorado State University","keywords":"Ecology; Mark and recapture; Population; Endangered species; Population size; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Geography; Context (archaeology); Population decline; Wildlife; Threatened species; Nest (protein structural motif); Occupancy; Marsupial; Biology; Habitat; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05598821278998205,"gpt":0.3308031804190195,"spread":0.2748149676290375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003627141,0.0001119445,0.0001830393,0.0000433075,0.0005570322,0.00004801283,0.0006398298,0.00008301273,0.00166325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003351361,0.00006582603,0.00004707748,0.00043391,0.001563987,0.0003601884,0.0004539505,0.0003783822,0.0000618872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003771063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005049019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002817697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001961194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976318,0.0005278476,0.0004212279,0.0003062972,0.0006989958,0.0004138167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982506,0.000866922,0.0001776046,0.0005534161,0.00006778818,0.00008367114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000415235,0.0000476397,0.9897732,0.00001523681,0.00001972825,0.000002911028,0.0005512151,0.00004028883,0.00192995,0.0004659508,0.003785629,0.003326706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002481053,0.0001093254,0.9920907,0.00001839845,0.00001024963,0.00001275632,0.0006705613,0.004044752,0.0003464056,0.001036853,0.001320823,0.00009104111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892316,0.000135693,0.00001620299,0.008734904,0.00005755495,0.0005062744,0.00000579777,0.00001032985,0.001301652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987925,0.0001248857,0.0003884615,0.000495135,0.00006238524,0.00002695904,0.000005955572,0.00001271747,0.00009104177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009560868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136663220","doi":"10.1071/wr07053","title":"Philopatry and site fidelity of New Zealand sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Philopatry; Biological dispersal; Threatened species; Ecology; Biology; Population; Habitat; Geography; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08509229325081591,"gpt":0.3310924149159215,"spread":0.2460001216651055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007117675,0.000117733,0.0002193866,0.0000541695,0.0003030041,0.00001340824,0.0002474264,0.00005751606,0.00151951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002355969,0.0001034256,0.00005018672,0.0005333304,0.0006201011,0.0001314809,0.001301451,0.0003024023,0.0004167346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009675328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005783961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0190023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002824951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979702,0.0001441126,0.0002312719,0.0003549342,0.0008439933,0.0004554617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999147,0.0001516873,0.00004222061,0.000339739,0.00003179544,0.0002875453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002943766,0.00004547035,0.8479363,0.00002302846,0.000008772553,0.00001546156,0.0003755165,0.000007047212,0.000217868,0.000009631475,0.1475768,0.003754668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002806518,0.000139979,0.8647415,0.00002087476,0.000003953431,0.00001925198,0.00003398875,0.00005555822,0.00005761453,0.0002518191,0.1342974,0.00009737577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829597,0.000636953,0.000005510018,0.001941313,0.00001746479,0.0002461747,0.00001487565,0.00002009664,0.01415788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894475,0.0049475,0.0004277517,0.000340941,0.00009141702,0.00001189231,0.000004445556,0.00001478308,0.004713801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01680521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981361409","doi":"10.1071/wr18122","title":"Estimating kangaroo density by aerial survey: a comparison of thermal cameras with human observers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lethbridge College","funders":"","keywords":"Aerial survey; Wildlife; Transect; Wildlife management; Geography; Population; Ecology; Distance sampling; Habitat; Animal ecology; Population density; Camera trap; Wildlife conservation; Human–wildlife conflict; Survey methodology; Photogrammetry; Remote sensing; Biology; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06558777232214827,"gpt":0.3466673594029797,"spread":0.2810795870808315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093626,0.0001161904,0.0002492128,0.00004245153,0.0002974726,0.00002662358,0.0003408391,0.000112442,0.001117098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001649159,0.0001008803,0.00003041121,0.000382825,0.0004876134,0.0001934282,0.0002227624,0.0003936241,0.00042591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001264799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005638502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008660092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003008126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975774,0.0006843804,0.0002503197,0.000339458,0.0007152387,0.0004332221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989999,0.0003946775,0.0001133296,0.0003362424,0.00005614996,0.00009969042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001434304,0.0001297066,0.9756958,0.00001226155,0.00001832301,0.000001579995,0.0003036852,0.001000523,0.007303975,0.00002464407,0.01503542,0.0003306635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000550068,0.0003391318,0.9945219,0.0000191764,0.000004646334,0.000001132843,0.000130684,0.003400229,0.0005706142,0.00002518669,0.000318701,0.0001185275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976427,0.000008782692,0.00004337533,0.0003095565,0.00008051376,0.0003615087,0.000009721952,0.00002152557,0.001522344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985816,5.226828e-7,0.0005792592,0.0001358105,0.00003651189,0.00001458217,0.00004728313,0.0000148055,0.0005896199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01882611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124739769","doi":"10.1071/wr12168","title":"Seasons of the ringed seal: pelagic open-water hyperphagy, benthic feeding over winter and spring fasting during molt","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nunavut Wildlife Management Board; ArcticNet","keywords":"Phoca; Blubber; Pelagic zone; Biology; Foraging; Context (archaeology); Arctic; Benthic zone; Bay; Seasonality; δ13C; Ecology; Fishery; Oceanography; Stable isotope ratio","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05484123731665384,"gpt":0.3139490860243298,"spread":0.2591078487076759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001315198,0.0001623327,0.0002250476,0.00004891327,0.0006761122,0.0002011494,0.0008910421,0.00005740128,0.002661515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002555734,0.0001036664,0.00006129146,0.0003254355,0.0004275684,0.0004721993,0.01030585,0.0005289817,0.000256299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001914244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001120187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007382734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00187022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974921,0.0002183154,0.0002336817,0.0004513063,0.0008544034,0.0007501777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992066,0.000147106,0.00005511329,0.0003906523,0.000042229,0.0001582885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001192524,0.00003463477,0.9804605,0.00009160606,0.00002348353,0.000003380002,0.0004385994,0.00003756506,0.01662544,0.00003634468,0.001200528,0.001035981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003429948,0.00003594664,0.9940431,0.000148035,0.000007236275,0.000007255495,0.0002808755,0.0006062098,0.001983985,0.00007174787,0.002336356,0.0001362982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772941,0.0001058611,0.000001403306,0.002420175,0.00004246491,0.0006994879,0.000001945371,0.00001788104,0.01941663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980673,0.000106596,0.0001400928,0.0001669694,0.00006000504,0.00006088452,3.029375e-7,0.00002866574,0.001369244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02077308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142250007","doi":"10.1071/wr07081","title":"Some human, aircraft and animal factors affecting aerial surveys: how to enumerate animals from the air","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fleming College","funders":"","keywords":"Aerial survey; Wildlife; Salience (neuroscience); Dingo; Aerial imagery; Enumeration; Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Remote sensing; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08267940010888417,"gpt":0.3181579676513143,"spread":0.2354785675424301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002839366,0.0001691976,0.000196868,0.00005801147,0.00164319,0.00008063738,0.0004059138,0.0001396702,0.0003443761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007773332,0.0001283846,0.00004392568,0.0004204054,0.0006073639,0.0003624765,0.0005422796,0.0004752743,0.0003468947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001241217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004502694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001373151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965172,0.001528445,0.0001780045,0.0005227781,0.0006299142,0.0006236057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981509,0.001232313,0.00005007313,0.0003243074,0.00003262963,0.000209784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004015,0.00003353045,0.9682222,0.000001911465,0.0000152901,0.00001587727,0.001411096,0.00001808585,0.006474802,0.00003974831,0.02357035,0.0001569367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002788226,0.0002499653,0.995167,0.000009117047,0.000003866266,0.000005495917,0.0004678048,0.00003721162,0.0005074829,0.0002133788,0.002907202,0.0001526646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989781,0.00006306178,0.00001844173,0.009316292,0.0001152556,0.0004625146,0.00002145171,0.00004925778,0.0001727419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978992,0.00003624976,0.00009968563,0.0009164696,0.0005129678,0.0000326859,0.00001398321,0.00002130377,0.0004674364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02694477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052722082","doi":"10.1071/wr03098","title":"The influence of predation risk on foraging behaviour of brushtail possums in Australian woodlands","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Predation; Woodland; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Fauna; Abundance (ecology)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03058703281397451,"gpt":0.3258271115579116,"spread":0.295240078743937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002361702,0.00006802833,0.00009828235,0.00009101081,0.0001906346,0.00001356942,0.0003300788,0.0000838445,0.0001220506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003866836,0.00005313842,0.00002767983,0.0003945032,0.0003883063,0.0002212873,0.0001153584,0.0003645153,0.00009549264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001291146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003768769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001884064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002506227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984339,0.0002384805,0.0003019612,0.0001894219,0.0005265492,0.0003096736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991267,0.0003901633,0.0001153413,0.0002823669,0.00003735888,0.00004811606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006978035,0.00008854885,0.9821345,0.000004185696,0.00000370111,7.582918e-7,0.0004012412,0.009292105,0.0002566571,0.00012504,0.001624686,0.005998823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002638568,0.0001177226,0.9969156,0.00003113397,0.000002763164,6.234322e-7,0.0001669818,0.0005077024,0.0003487036,0.0003344218,0.001261561,0.00004896127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956533,0.000008812212,0.000002329229,0.003024082,0.00001620422,0.0002462541,0.000005827599,0.000006606684,0.001036598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990873,0.00006803757,0.00008151994,0.00008133968,0.00002083132,0.00003011897,0.000003601424,0.000005871035,0.0006213909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2848154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091283353","doi":"10.1071/wr05101","title":"Diet of a native carnivore, the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus), before and after an intense wildfire","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Predation; Ecology; Biology; Marsupial; Carnivore; Bandicoot; Abundance (ecology)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0228737736122396,"gpt":0.3124786063002092,"spread":0.2896048326879696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003247604,0.0001475606,0.0001838462,0.0001159633,0.000341264,0.00003120526,0.0003717972,0.0001658365,0.0003032474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003121537,0.0001031091,0.00005114128,0.0006525966,0.001490528,0.0002851469,0.0003778302,0.0005426355,0.00008871151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001309035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004456865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00121184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006248449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976456,0.0003843365,0.0002859862,0.0003974639,0.0007189292,0.0005676827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988773,0.0003856169,0.0000770715,0.0004132307,0.00006576903,0.0001809705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006402149,0.00006927572,0.9918896,0.000008012371,0.0000237093,0.00003922731,0.002790322,0.000006971366,0.00002730599,0.0001425191,0.001274507,0.003088313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003301675,0.0004833741,0.9939961,0.00002184327,0.00001097751,0.00001079751,0.001414599,0.0004673048,0.000004537565,0.00105406,0.00209998,0.000106261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956932,0.0000655309,0.00001325612,0.002118322,0.00006292913,0.0004473824,0.000009735277,0.00002203797,0.001567594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978416,0.00002453209,0.000126589,0.001161212,0.00007651553,0.00005135162,0.000009638672,0.00001764005,0.0006909149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005036609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5491911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068295275","doi":"10.1071/wr07106","title":"Achieving population goals in a long-lived wildlife species (Equus caballus) with contraception","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Veterinary Equine Medical Research","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Park Service; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Population; Population growth; Wildlife; Population control; Equus; Demography; Biology; Wildlife management; Family planning; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.259195008381391,"gpt":0.4383495313288694,"spread":0.1791545229474784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003968399,0.000386152,0.0006657027,0.001159309,0.000621168,0.0001403644,0.0008030213,0.00029861,0.001239833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002472786,0.0003317526,0.0001214688,0.001763877,0.0008674112,0.0007050936,0.0005679726,0.001964897,0.0007547213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009224031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004480759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002865206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005866872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909229,0.001786266,0.0007724146,0.0009819745,0.00365454,0.00188192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967784,0.001122007,0.0001214172,0.0009021033,0.0004627278,0.0006133239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005576581,0.0008499245,0.9553479,0.0003112275,0.00008727915,0.01223734,0.002277476,0.0001267382,0.009324331,0.0003410946,0.007441754,0.006078376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002376004,0.003728322,0.9839331,0.0005033865,0.000006502387,0.001379072,0.0005563545,0.001177689,0.00001537682,0.00005899477,0.005849426,0.0004157713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894383,0.0003248297,0.0004249933,0.00403433,0.00009336761,0.001419411,0.00001585548,0.000164614,0.004084311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994488,0.0005841065,0.0005023744,0.0002781345,0.0005417436,0.000253124,0.0001086086,0.0001028629,0.003141065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02858522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021994883","doi":"10.1071/wr04093","title":"Home ranges of feral cats (Felis catus) in central-western New South Wales, Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation","keywords":"Home range; Feral cat; CATS; Habitat; Woodland; Predation; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Wildlife; Fauna; Biology; Felis catus; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08799359204062367,"gpt":0.3447760694869446,"spread":0.2567824774463209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008789138,0.0001349336,0.0002131645,0.0001518288,0.0001036232,0.00002624996,0.0004369296,0.0001774472,0.001653666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001102995,0.0001308533,0.00005005657,0.0005657392,0.0003585625,0.0002974771,0.0002096254,0.0004591028,0.001254311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003093272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001049681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006896992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01098352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976041,0.0002679502,0.000323412,0.0003733056,0.000636503,0.0007947054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992101,0.0001263453,0.0000618601,0.0003376629,0.0000210801,0.0002429088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006927919,0.0001013588,0.9679416,0.00001070346,0.000007133184,0.000009438596,0.001856419,0.0004117526,0.0002591793,0.00004774803,0.02697476,0.002310606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006627655,0.00006908297,0.9864194,0.00002641894,0.000003775605,0.000003867259,0.0001485826,0.0001070711,0.0001624196,0.0001976077,0.01206505,0.0001339136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912493,0.00006791157,0.00001194513,0.007599015,0.000073412,0.0002966206,0.000009786527,0.00001977397,0.0006722712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988617,0.00005286373,0.0002902436,0.0004244946,0.0001826181,0.00001944414,0.00001390356,0.00001414373,0.01038528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01847783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171633698","doi":"10.1071/wr12039","title":"Revealing a cryptic life-history stage: differences in habitat selection and survivorship between hatchlings of two turtle species at risk (Glyptemys insculpta and Emydoidea blandingii)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Hatchling; Ecology; Biology; Overwintering; Habitat; Survivorship curve; Painted turtle; Turtle (robot); Predation; Population; Context (archaeology); Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1138460940594011,"gpt":0.310249921803021,"spread":0.1964038277436199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002770976,0.0001185633,0.0002202569,0.0001458614,0.0002195368,0.00001724855,0.0001263734,0.000123759,0.0002235708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000581521,0.0001031587,0.00002346081,0.0002838256,0.0005461811,0.0002670213,0.000248557,0.0003687031,0.00003207487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003167915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002908321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005729098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004134911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980255,0.0006326934,0.0002603804,0.0002866837,0.0003628868,0.0004318039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988597,0.0007176022,0.0001056881,0.0001287416,0.00002167437,0.0001665774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004944482,0.00002724538,0.9953925,0.00003444169,0.00001182954,4.840439e-7,0.001576543,0.000004896746,0.002041793,0.0001585679,0.0003593184,0.0003429116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003185347,0.00007997425,0.9967095,0.000033152,0.000009600398,0.000001306068,0.0002611056,0.0002103051,0.0001994868,0.0002743052,0.00178988,0.0001128881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979922,0.0008310677,0.00003066463,0.0002623122,0.00006319914,0.0001998962,0.000008572758,0.00001500493,0.0005970821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977569,0.0003232166,0.0001990123,0.00003870526,0.0001007555,0.00001633248,0.000006194357,0.000009629491,0.001549241],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002189455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8660721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999098784","doi":"10.1071/wr07071","title":"Effects of drought on weight, survival and breeding success of agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis), dusky antechinus (A. swainsonii) and bush rats (Rattus fuscipes)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Zoology; Seasonal breeder","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0194728679298694,"gpt":0.2964306213737513,"spread":0.2769577534438819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004608683,0.000311628,0.0005514628,0.000416103,0.0005086962,0.00004649436,0.0005151238,0.000340481,0.00009662642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000665213,0.0002828658,0.00007944254,0.001096699,0.001736793,0.0004188301,0.0006118498,0.0008436375,0.00003100886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001453938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006233607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001256531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007839487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996077,0.0004765694,0.0006191078,0.0007550608,0.001184939,0.000887336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967042,0.002231338,0.0002359608,0.000441287,0.0000968141,0.0002904211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005199827,0.0003475118,0.9437289,0.0002671002,0.00005789596,0.0001458954,0.0006006412,0.00001634285,0.04144231,0.001166251,0.001402728,0.01030449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001373137,0.0009335725,0.954046,0.0002729737,0.0000278611,0.00004283412,0.0002599705,0.0004048828,0.04027025,0.001093316,0.0009433631,0.000331848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928515,0.0003758328,0.0003380459,0.0006959909,0.0002443884,0.000721014,0.00001818497,0.00005346789,0.004701563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984149,0.0005091142,0.0003510697,0.0001695896,0.0001123495,0.00001942048,0.000006959602,0.00003417498,0.0003824639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01031715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065380933","doi":"10.1071/wr03131","title":"Can outbreaks of house mice in south-eastern Australia be predicted by weather models?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Outbreak; Predictability; Geography; Population; Vegetation (pathology); House mouse; House mice; Climatology; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Demography; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1034833164734572,"gpt":0.3475435595743693,"spread":0.2440602431009121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005213837,0.0001177239,0.0001827543,0.00007191276,0.0001132362,0.00001036686,0.0003256586,0.0001416727,0.000740324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004048397,0.0001042422,0.00003845402,0.0003377604,0.0007317559,0.0001162875,0.000323153,0.0004043141,0.0001066598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002353587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003530474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01017703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004994344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982597,0.0001188086,0.0002209988,0.0003234837,0.0005402818,0.0005367613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995826,0.0000403713,0.00004004346,0.0001978575,0.00002093158,0.0001181508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008300271,0.0003468899,0.9845735,0.000009988742,0.00001320675,0.00002402971,0.004831612,0.0007556276,0.001627602,0.00007685705,0.007535119,0.0001225772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001902869,0.000611166,0.9896829,0.00006155326,0.00001997964,0.000005693281,0.002989367,0.0005172755,0.0008103654,0.001217068,0.0018615,0.0003202971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957612,0.00002599124,0.00001949554,0.001371335,0.00002306136,0.0002594467,0.00009519965,0.0000271463,0.002417195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958256,0.00002371908,0.0001028483,0.00009347869,0.00001388709,0.0000397658,0.000003897231,0.00001850451,0.003878338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005673619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973067932","doi":"10.1071/wr13090","title":"Evaluation of predator-exclusion cages used in turtle conservation: cost analysis and effects on nest environment and proxies of hatchling fitness","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Hatchling; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Turtle (robot); Predation; Ecology; Chelydra; Predator; Context (archaeology); Nest box; Painted turtle; Hatching; Zoology; Fishery","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05873463479451411,"gpt":0.3301222129980049,"spread":0.2713875782034908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002540655,0.00007175096,0.0001581854,0.0001480693,0.00008403919,0.00001283384,0.00007946399,0.00008301275,0.0002007305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002717689,0.00006070194,0.0000169561,0.0003807184,0.0003480283,0.0001578051,0.0001380749,0.0001073259,0.00001159915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009130416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002367254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001990146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005282539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981329,0.0006120376,0.0001914442,0.0002368535,0.0006812901,0.0001455127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991798,0.0004826742,0.00007374518,0.0001733669,0.00004688526,0.00004356699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000242505,0.0000519114,0.9738501,0.00002860823,0.00002474226,3.140725e-7,0.0004636266,0.0004619089,0.01295516,0.00002112407,0.00009112727,0.01202711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004397532,0.0001081509,0.9755663,0.0000383734,0.00004352457,3.300283e-7,0.0001507752,0.01612438,0.006919198,0.0005006683,0.00005420894,0.00005437774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977884,0.0001102421,0.00003215854,0.001130468,0.00001035708,0.0008231765,0.000003078517,0.00000381686,0.00009825912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995307,0.00009308135,0.0001101536,0.0000505009,0.000007773136,0.0001335418,0.00001346423,0.000003837168,0.00005689662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01566247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3008519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090349066","doi":"10.1071/wr13211","title":"Reproductive seasonality in African ungulates in relation to rainfall","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Livestock Research Institute; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of British Columbia; Universität Hohenheim; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ungulate; Fecundity; Seasonality; Ecology; Biology; Forage; Wet season; Context (archaeology); Phenology; Dry season; Geography; Population; Demography; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0401490268679958,"gpt":0.3222859526010739,"spread":0.2821369257330781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005745542,0.00008060711,0.0001257899,0.0001325795,0.0001070273,0.00001833252,0.0002285438,0.00009791148,0.0002997887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002338141,0.00008217945,0.00001886197,0.001325535,0.0001917343,0.0002140074,0.0002199716,0.0003945656,0.0008365121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004290931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000331961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002210649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003912969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975151,0.000849794,0.0002231334,0.0005188839,0.0004575502,0.0004355726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990767,0.0004175295,0.00002988646,0.0003453027,0.0000254755,0.0001051638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000738727,0.00007658959,0.9905018,0.000003004311,0.000001825636,0.000003116195,0.0009667999,0.001483412,0.0001715051,0.0009618379,0.003325789,0.002430514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002278956,0.00007009233,0.9821005,0.00001449814,7.243194e-7,9.206701e-7,0.000124269,0.001453735,0.00002108406,0.007471944,0.008424563,0.00008976977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646744,0.000007173306,0.00004608489,0.02002391,0.00003967193,0.0003904259,9.163201e-7,0.00001768741,0.01479977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977497,0.0000032904,0.0003815538,0.000776713,0.00006514564,0.00008320233,0.000005368066,0.000008401952,0.0009265562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03307541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076615238","doi":"10.1071/wr03068","title":"Status of Australian sea lions, Neophoca cinerea, and New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, on Eyre Peninsula and the far west coast of South Australia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Shaughnessy Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Fur seal; Geography; Reef; Fishery; Full moon; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09791474959859696,"gpt":0.3499212276295176,"spread":0.2520064780309206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001028966,0.000208934,0.0003962807,0.00008180273,0.0002066854,0.00004376472,0.0003249351,0.00008311201,0.001137616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001899248,0.0001429812,0.00006108316,0.0004294778,0.001113572,0.0001247614,0.0008662808,0.0003879669,0.00008084382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001023452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005174552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05846697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01322095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972643,0.000272491,0.0003880541,0.0004116444,0.0009189933,0.0007444695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987882,0.0002582645,0.0001267336,0.0003915061,0.00003993988,0.0003953598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006741425,0.000097122,0.9326771,0.0001048616,0.00005109593,0.000007775896,0.002302206,0.00007914688,0.0001792139,0.0002360927,0.0514714,0.01211981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002205851,0.0005344821,0.8648019,0.00007780889,0.00002428391,0.00001282371,0.0008950748,0.0001432064,0.00009152279,0.0001172242,0.1309383,0.0001575002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99193,0.000296028,8.558406e-7,0.004926878,0.00001757528,0.0006169872,0.00008660622,0.00001003252,0.002115034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883934,0.001794992,0.000188706,0.000181261,0.00008722962,0.00001804282,0.000008057787,0.0000189279,0.009309351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07946689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596797771","doi":"10.1071/wr16178","title":"Falling apart? Insights and lessons from three recent studies documenting rapid and severe decline in terrestrial mammal assemblages of northern, south-eastern and south-western Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Deakin University","keywords":"Mammal; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Geography; Fauna; National park; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Wildlife; Biology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1753560531672213,"gpt":0.3923896105052271,"spread":0.2170335573380059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198835,0.0001634499,0.0003060455,0.00008198562,0.0005452139,0.000164035,0.0002721573,0.0001414868,0.00003073401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004659293,0.0001440845,0.00002082608,0.00008433265,0.0008566895,0.0004180943,0.001070927,0.0003454377,0.00001921333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004717611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002460273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002289749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04709906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981058,0.0002506326,0.0003455661,0.0004964747,0.0004151534,0.0003864137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989848,0.0003547485,0.0001940484,0.0003217274,0.00002561519,0.0001190434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001545518,0.00003138742,0.9898202,0.00001715862,0.0000436322,0.00001866052,0.003289984,0.00001308037,0.0002282845,0.000006918327,0.00004458653,0.006331552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001281086,0.0000919702,0.9952195,0.000120834,0.00001648188,0.000002815524,0.001271315,0.0003394801,0.00003557477,0.001104798,0.0003711176,0.0001449828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954252,0.0004490235,0.000008130097,0.003621221,0.0000906753,0.0003117906,0.000007884937,0.000008986118,0.00007703845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988195,0.0006618182,0.0001382703,0.00007642234,0.0001199023,0.00002257538,0.000005200379,0.00001190143,0.0001443929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04480931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9702889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806569854","doi":"10.1071/wr17106","title":"Northward bound: the distribution of white-tailed deer in Ontario under a changing climate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Climate change; Geography; Occupancy; Snow; Context (archaeology); Physical geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Species distribution; Habitat; Biology; Meteorology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07452820469779643,"gpt":0.3259663112367001,"spread":0.2514381065389037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002067777,0.0001055597,0.000136745,0.00007630194,0.0006464546,0.00005002447,0.0003616927,0.00007658606,0.02612672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008657569,0.00007802151,0.00005564598,0.0009862643,0.0008529603,0.0001364386,0.0007964305,0.0003432444,0.001272159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001767037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005747439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01573331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3740035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976038,0.0001695817,0.0002390022,0.0002784531,0.0008211643,0.0008879638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993452,0.00008429426,0.00005253787,0.0003574887,0.00006377201,0.00009667678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006381361,0.00009965569,0.989444,0.000006871228,0.000005629819,0.000003049032,0.002017004,0.00001705481,0.0003243336,0.001936339,0.005866944,0.0002153025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003226564,0.00009205908,0.9476904,0.00002259843,0.000003198188,0.000003285996,0.003271658,0.000154549,0.0001744577,0.0001799167,0.04798668,0.00009854382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98114,0.00001483497,0.00006419254,0.001904891,0.00008451069,0.0002835278,0.00005014762,0.00001698807,0.01644094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986565,0.00003392413,0.000008560738,0.0002301053,0.00004362598,0.00004412663,0.000106284,0.000009582535,0.000867336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3582702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066645665","doi":"10.1071/wr06081","title":"Usefulness of funnel traps in catching small reptiles and mammals, with comments on the effectiveness of the alternatives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Edith Cowan University","keywords":"Arboreal locomotion; Fauna; Ecology; Fossorial; Funnel; Biology; Squamata; Foraging; Abundance (ecology); Netting; Habitat; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06368735049202758,"gpt":0.3037769982693805,"spread":0.240089647777353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006251955,0.0000729001,0.0001190591,0.00005882838,0.0001613669,0.00000789668,0.000315045,0.00004833647,0.00002739254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002681242,0.00003944855,0.00001928074,0.0003752881,0.0007360587,0.00006658151,0.0001839726,0.0003022692,0.000003334345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006589107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002065455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001288974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001625432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979642,0.001068103,0.0001649488,0.0001872287,0.0003849315,0.0002305581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968445,0.002786261,0.00006959702,0.0002479695,0.00002088496,0.00003073564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003868905,0.0001153655,0.9952739,0.00002714387,0.00001224438,0.000002886296,0.0007495944,0.0001688066,0.0008872016,0.001300998,0.00004724297,0.001027754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003600345,0.0001357015,0.9939593,0.0001546568,0.000002393235,0.000002164445,0.0006685456,0.00007559465,0.003618518,0.0009068415,0.00007256736,0.00004367044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967827,0.00001133562,0.00004767848,0.0011735,0.00002260231,0.0004357974,0.000002513061,0.000002939973,0.001520961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999688,0.000009831941,0.00002544537,0.0001757987,0.000008330047,0.00002815165,6.551124e-7,0.000006410146,0.000057377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005983831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2712039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031846047","doi":"10.1071/wr04031","title":"Home range of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus), a marsupial carnivore, in a rainshadow woodland","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Woodland; Home range; Carnivore; Ecology; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Predation; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02804340595625633,"gpt":0.2911045849696797,"spread":0.2630611790134234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001880368,0.0001405932,0.0002266447,0.0001534779,0.0002195226,0.00002500595,0.0006697931,0.0001897928,0.001084697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002881949,0.0001066317,0.000094152,0.001156077,0.0006116457,0.0002040153,0.0004535293,0.0006184987,0.0005119762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003223792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009951651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001224804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004726395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971542,0.0006290734,0.0003405295,0.0003709906,0.0008886022,0.0006166449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990234,0.0002813044,0.00007902429,0.0004758257,0.00003234741,0.0001080799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001700699,0.0001394698,0.9906803,0.00001022,0.00001046867,0.00001035169,0.0004702825,0.0003280243,0.00002556647,0.00009471302,0.006231591,0.001828944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001182714,0.00006714155,0.9882931,0.00002973483,0.000005355095,0.000008028779,0.00009038758,0.001057674,4.491543e-7,0.0003995045,0.008745304,0.0001206472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887494,0.00007435281,0.000003180611,0.005494055,0.00009211686,0.0005561311,0.00001123264,0.0000183773,0.005001083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965248,0.0000410529,0.0001340791,0.0009385063,0.0001253869,0.00007557257,0.000004440426,0.00001676724,0.002139372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007775352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1996699596","doi":"10.1071/wr05057","title":"Home range and den characteristics of the brush-tailed rabbit-rat (Conilurus penicillatus) in the monsoonal tropics of the Northern Territory, Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Home range; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Ecology; Tropics; Geography; Floristics; Diameter at breast height; Forestry; Species richness","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03295778763565697,"gpt":0.2794786409986995,"spread":0.2465208533630425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001179371,0.0001075072,0.0001714947,0.0000394021,0.0002585995,0.00002441919,0.000697646,0.0001211052,0.000132308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000142126,0.00005814407,0.00006793489,0.0003903855,0.001141977,0.0000878942,0.0002941727,0.0004584798,0.00002617979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009778667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006204291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01172685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977269,0.0007196668,0.000331782,0.0002084094,0.0006889833,0.0003242993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990088,0.0003403322,0.0001298418,0.0004556772,0.00003404947,0.00003127939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004340944,0.0000735777,0.9962886,0.00001198398,0.00000651244,0.000002323446,0.0003095338,0.00003025655,0.0005173454,0.0001587109,0.002302889,0.0002548794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000368947,0.00004250489,0.9958152,0.00002177793,0.0000100771,0.000006422975,0.0001179602,0.0001285004,0.00004665442,0.0005757437,0.002801137,0.00006506898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938875,0.00003919283,0.000001242613,0.005038711,0.0001169838,0.0004637812,0.00001808309,0.000003655657,0.0004308005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986016,0.00001746345,0.00001425414,0.0002116066,0.00008789191,0.00002906496,0.000002984746,0.000008273822,0.001026926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007472053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.654386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063309068","doi":"10.1071/wr03041","title":"Population structure, turnover and movement of spotted-tailed quolls on the New England Tablelands","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"National Parks and Wildlife Service; National Park Service","keywords":"Biology; Population; Ecology; Wildlife management; Zoology; Wildlife; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02495570494433349,"gpt":0.2803911583633984,"spread":0.2554354534190649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007968943,0.00008833542,0.0001116871,0.00005988128,0.0002199485,0.00002474901,0.0001695727,0.00009041611,0.0008943143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002123961,0.00005890175,0.00002040748,0.0003384055,0.0001695996,0.0001213587,0.0001227552,0.0002649185,0.0000570983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001278378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003894599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002127345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001299333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986471,0.0001467124,0.0001748701,0.0002235281,0.0005452206,0.0002625606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993684,0.0002352618,0.00005553397,0.0002396894,0.00001729351,0.00008385108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007953931,0.00003634067,0.9886608,0.000004333393,0.00001166092,0.000001775345,0.0002592052,0.001101774,0.0005760237,0.003221235,0.004822111,0.001225175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008996873,0.0001454561,0.9751294,0.0000179274,0.000004225592,0.000001654782,0.00004692646,0.00009520043,0.0001707454,0.02136629,0.002057588,0.00006486636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917812,0.00001986135,0.00002281519,0.006644865,0.000050189,0.0003075212,0.000006655978,0.000009577522,0.001157308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980233,0.00002202575,0.0001039131,0.001171434,0.00008205086,0.000008811497,0.00001264701,0.000007727976,0.0005681436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01814505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9792114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024814202","doi":"10.1071/wr05007","title":"Nest-tree selection by the threatened brush-tailed phascogale (Phascogale tapoatafa) (Marsupialia : Dasyuridae) in a highly fragmented agricultural landscape","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Deakin University","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Threatened species; Ecology; Biology; Near-threatened species; Diameter at breast height; Nest box; Habitat; Forestry; Geography; Predation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01643836029052297,"gpt":0.2694929738511209,"spread":0.2530546135605979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00155993,0.0002506705,0.0002480043,0.000130182,0.0007281851,0.0001347126,0.0005967112,0.0002362779,0.001383643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001305319,0.0001774093,0.00008133955,0.001694428,0.0004151507,0.0005239352,0.0002545251,0.0006818475,0.001044248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003928823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007178669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007212823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01384931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963321,0.0007005727,0.0004223601,0.0006386493,0.0009826402,0.0009236539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990313,0.0003213175,0.0001029431,0.0003576058,0.00006702475,0.0001197884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001143904,0.0002698205,0.7365327,0.000004874979,0.00001266528,0.000008474361,0.0001030683,0.0002145669,0.004834087,0.00008716891,0.2572713,0.0005468689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001641201,0.0001775074,0.9755234,0.00002037338,0.00001296316,0.00001791678,0.0002434918,0.00125729,0.0005833122,0.0003959466,0.01988701,0.0002395754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788741,0.000117092,0.00003854779,0.008645664,0.00014243,0.0008116585,0.00001540992,0.00008660412,0.01126853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890733,0.00004255956,0.00008685319,0.000480406,0.0002354749,0.0002743105,0.0001700249,0.00002351091,0.009613588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2389907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009766541","doi":"10.1071/wr14050","title":"Responses of red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi) to windrows of woody debris along forest–clearcut edges","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Clearcutting; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Debris; Habitat; Coarse woody debris; Population; Context (archaeology); Environmental science; Logging; Forest management; Geography; Forestry; Biology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04847157073032404,"gpt":0.3216072904469489,"spread":0.2731357197166249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003242474,0.0001512566,0.0003111064,0.0002407777,0.0002336906,0.00002053618,0.0006300372,0.000172501,0.0005400135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002398941,0.0001420819,0.00008057432,0.0007898844,0.0008982571,0.0002104946,0.0004984316,0.0003022749,0.0004136576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009460163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008343965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00127568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001315674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996783,0.0008711179,0.0004522492,0.0004347033,0.0008762897,0.0005826304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978324,0.00113948,0.0001111551,0.0006049764,0.0001048403,0.0002071402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004092866,0.0001331428,0.9569793,0.00003282574,0.00001989696,0.000004625791,0.0004463393,0.000308295,0.008419638,0.0004846716,0.02805471,0.004707313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003211922,0.000560788,0.9801481,0.00007321722,0.000007685589,0.000006707542,0.0003268569,0.0004886024,0.004323198,0.001250451,0.01234612,0.0001471106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989709,0.00003372487,0.0001963604,0.005696947,0.00005817322,0.0004042657,0.00000822771,0.00002798463,0.003865371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966311,0.00002978724,0.001144255,0.0004579939,0.00006945743,0.00005206481,0.000005847764,0.00002418374,0.001585275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02316881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.591277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051321352","doi":"10.1071/wr05014","title":"The immediate impact of 1080 aerial baiting to control wild dogs on a spotted-tailed quoll population","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"NSW Department of Primary Industries","keywords":"Biology; Dingo; Population; Wildlife; Ecology; Predation; Zoology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02656552524991818,"gpt":0.3358626897373338,"spread":0.3092971644874156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002820818,0.0001386649,0.0001924754,0.0001131809,0.0005600247,0.00005157355,0.0004051918,0.0001639087,0.0005749436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001196352,0.0000979234,0.0001062704,0.0005703175,0.0002200368,0.0002123106,0.0001408324,0.0004819977,0.001063262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004811324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000637599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002079247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009962182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997302,0.0005346565,0.0003756444,0.0003302492,0.0008103829,0.0006470548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982593,0.001001443,0.0001109952,0.0003872011,0.00005199134,0.000189048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006555648,0.00008030857,0.973133,0.000001974126,0.00002452516,0.000001929595,0.0001521028,0.004534092,0.0005662339,0.0002569039,0.01340839,0.007184985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008589738,0.0003676879,0.9925498,0.00001754932,0.000005897728,0.000001922388,0.00004367443,0.00321193,0.00001865325,0.0002772306,0.002541078,0.000105653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872774,0.00001287678,0.00001901119,0.01008531,0.0001245783,0.0006385793,0.00001219691,0.00002567381,0.001804311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978697,0.00001508329,0.00007947221,0.001108796,0.0004768072,0.00008122477,0.00001122275,0.00001697923,0.0003406621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01941676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059148513","doi":"10.1071/wr09129","title":"Justification for continued conservation efforts following the delisting of a threatened species: a case study of the woylie, Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi (Marsupialia : Potoroidae)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Government of Western Australia","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Conservation-dependent species; Conservation status; Near-threatened species; Endangered species; Critically endangered; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Population; Biology; Wildlife conservation; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Wildlife; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07683211321990467,"gpt":0.3439742307303185,"spread":0.2671421175104138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004266025,0.0001379954,0.0002340463,0.0000642634,0.0009023469,0.00004111969,0.0006023661,0.0001352398,0.0001175069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002053393,0.0000913276,0.000121007,0.0006803656,0.0005477582,0.0001953446,0.0003193824,0.0004126535,0.000009302375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007979412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005251072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01193159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975544,0.0004154696,0.0005596709,0.0003679043,0.0007313131,0.000371289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997248,0.00141159,0.0002959182,0.0008001325,0.0001862034,0.00005814038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000942217,0.0002121907,0.9830171,0.00002042991,0.00004391823,0.00001155754,0.002040366,0.00006568541,0.01050171,0.0003305133,0.002931193,0.0007311039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00115762,0.0002358955,0.9866643,0.00002898048,0.0000819644,0.00004073535,0.005721349,0.003034378,0.0006865722,0.0003569108,0.001861266,0.0001300405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941922,0.000008350682,0.00006643203,0.002472269,0.0003163709,0.002475345,0.00001489154,0.00001592287,0.0004382498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985527,0.000001932739,0.0002505959,0.0001664002,0.00007862399,0.0002344882,0.00000892768,0.00001707115,0.0006893061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009815141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7938085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884005247","doi":"10.1071/wr17155","title":"The use of point-of-view cameras (Kittycams) to quantify predation by colony cats (Felis catus) on wildlife","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Island Health","funders":"American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals","keywords":"Predation; Wildlife; Felis catus; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Wildlife conservation; Camera trap; Invertebrate; Apex predator; Fishery; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.108823834129463,"gpt":0.3604271797108198,"spread":0.2516033455813568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002559969,0.0001744969,0.0002562135,0.0001247001,0.0006351332,0.00005877911,0.0006766035,0.0001810161,0.0004620939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002084547,0.0001367002,0.00006860289,0.00108985,0.001362354,0.0003434182,0.0003709083,0.0003812173,0.001278916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002100133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001258454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003697807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00155425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964129,0.0007952238,0.0005347886,0.0004942392,0.001126718,0.0006361844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970838,0.001495763,0.0001874067,0.0008040071,0.0002163943,0.0002126546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003064691,0.0001923026,0.3779638,0.0000161728,0.00002754588,0.00000132887,0.0006258549,0.00009513905,0.001781311,0.0005928816,0.611377,0.007020163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003580341,0.001302298,0.4841338,0.0000961296,0.00001396486,0.000002995826,0.0001718985,0.0007515473,0.001876258,0.0002436335,0.5108442,0.0002051826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980132,0.00005456751,0.0001359396,0.01715274,0.0002097385,0.0009328998,0.00004339034,0.00002530007,0.001313381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918276,0.0002802665,0.0004373632,0.004372539,0.0001179219,0.0001275538,0.00003112146,0.00002941248,0.002776242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.10617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788447539","doi":"10.1071/wr17065","title":"Green-tree retention and recovery of an old-forest specialist, the southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi), 20 years after harvest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pinus contorta; Clearcutting; Basal area; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Species richness; Context (archaeology); Biodiversity; Old-growth forest; Snag; Species diversity; Habitat; Agroforestry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03038950147195481,"gpt":0.2915351704705165,"spread":0.2611456689985617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001299523,0.00009089393,0.0001223531,0.00006059408,0.0003397389,0.00004160973,0.0002456303,0.00008723501,0.0005772064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001326094,0.00006972304,0.0000379011,0.0002467535,0.002067866,0.0002202055,0.0003232295,0.0002023956,0.0003980866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005909718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001666341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001146615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0438791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984899,0.0003045795,0.0001901018,0.0002997765,0.000400534,0.0003151749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993649,0.0001287202,0.00005734221,0.0003202712,0.00005259625,0.00007624532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002502476,0.00009214987,0.986087,0.00001568811,0.00003620179,0.00001290613,0.002611362,0.00002357988,0.001009858,0.0002694746,0.004989186,0.004602383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002149751,0.0002886333,0.9899277,0.00001690656,0.000008023581,0.000004308599,0.000744802,0.0009122239,0.0000263722,0.003350598,0.004417038,0.00008841429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931576,0.000054856,0.00001391534,0.001663996,0.0000731381,0.0002178398,0.00002590193,0.00001287361,0.004779835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880762,0.00007224187,0.0002330432,0.0001780542,0.0001901925,0.00003265987,0.00001001832,0.00001398216,0.01119359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04273249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9735676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168981465","doi":"10.1071/wr06161","title":"Predicting the occurrence of the quokka, Setonix brachyurus (Macropodidae : Marsupialia), in Western Australia’s northern jarrah forest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Swamp; Biology; Ecology; Akaike information criterion; Geography; Forestry; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06254575811532997,"gpt":0.3469319008012395,"spread":0.2843861426859095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004299162,0.0001445231,0.0001595177,0.00007943253,0.0004457007,0.0000370229,0.001090793,0.0001583646,0.000292532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005552843,0.00009374859,0.00007304517,0.001016728,0.001188575,0.0002139368,0.0006044459,0.000882394,0.0003268422],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002387537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009440017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00935251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1362618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969411,0.0005065626,0.0004543883,0.0003672749,0.0009655597,0.0007651323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983834,0.0007220699,0.0001400813,0.0006070397,0.00004953953,0.00009785256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005677722,0.00008582384,0.9938682,0.00001179432,0.000007593243,0.00000817302,0.001054762,0.0005645791,0.00009027195,0.00004699666,0.002720994,0.001484061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002655642,0.00006067495,0.9941015,0.0000411534,0.000004957294,0.000009599874,0.0005167708,0.0002696771,0.00005645887,0.0002858338,0.004290612,0.00009719305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934726,0.00002100634,0.0000259868,0.004324134,0.0002231946,0.0005670811,0.00001879696,0.00001587235,0.00133133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977583,0.00001175331,0.00002648469,0.0004231916,0.00008249174,0.00003084774,0.000005154739,0.00001051193,0.001651285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1269093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037449408","doi":"10.1071/wr12024","title":"Hidden biodiversity in rare northern Australian vertebrates: the case of the clawless geckos (Crenadactylus, Diplodactylidae) of the Kimberley","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Phylogeography; Allopatric speciation; Biodiversity; Biogeography; Biology; Subspecies; Ecology; Phylogenetic diversity; Genetic diversity; Range (aeronautics); Context (archaeology); Biodiversity hotspot; Lineage (genetic); Geography; Endemism; Phylogenetic tree; Evolutionary biology; Population; Paleontology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04840640790592702,"gpt":0.3005431618873764,"spread":0.2521367539814494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001307355,0.0001248596,0.0001742378,0.0000391393,0.0003796014,0.00001284555,0.001075576,0.0001455773,0.0007982316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001599526,0.00005663634,0.0001213233,0.0006649395,0.00202481,0.0001164509,0.00113149,0.0005269572,0.0001923253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002052769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007343195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02021187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02748679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975423,0.0009460989,0.0002452641,0.0002241947,0.0004619587,0.0005802112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987394,0.0002349407,0.0001112007,0.0007629373,0.00003199996,0.000119529],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004457061,0.0001228544,0.9884158,0.00001493628,0.00001430551,0.00001519326,0.002021648,0.00001795664,0.001239114,0.00006331505,0.007018657,0.001011587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003986225,0.00006645812,0.9821294,0.00004352193,0.00001256163,0.00008826971,0.004083476,0.00004795489,0.002267221,0.00008051006,0.01065634,0.0001256739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938597,0.00006201752,3.695324e-7,0.003451409,0.0001196814,0.0004820338,0.00004439135,0.000005534612,0.001974878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987376,0.00002461269,0.00000841828,0.0001473946,0.00004655305,0.000008650274,0.000001978824,0.000007381217,0.0010174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00727492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994123841","doi":"10.1071/wr11105","title":"Assessment of bias in US waterfowl harvest estimates","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Goose; Branta; Geography; Context (archaeology); Anatidae; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Habitat; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4965470248049577,"gpt":0.5373102824956577,"spread":0.04076325769069999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009859075,0.0001112162,0.0002700376,0.000430303,0.00007662933,0.00003974892,0.0002425993,0.00009921117,0.0001149146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003447335,0.00009170917,0.00004629689,0.0004616401,0.0001366919,0.0002180105,0.0001368868,0.0003685954,0.00003863566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001060377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009779554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005466916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003296821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976752,0.0004802094,0.0004119242,0.0001603456,0.0007113149,0.0005610304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963273,0.002846611,0.00007445231,0.00040372,0.0002246955,0.0001232453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007515992,0.0003703609,0.9782779,0.0002101433,0.00001236005,0.000001586639,0.0003066687,0.00001530496,0.0003895172,0.0153002,0.004039554,0.001068895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003583711,0.0001322351,0.9495958,0.0003818839,0.000007482669,0.000007760479,0.0001745207,0.003769465,0.007220076,0.03637221,0.001769521,0.0002106786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896984,0.00007340335,0.004332013,0.0002398891,0.00005706264,0.0003066281,0.000008991366,0.0001158201,0.005167819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9211788,0.00003170419,0.07838404,0.00001938462,0.00005931046,0.00006994104,0.00001045895,0.00002466688,0.0002217119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07405203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4127031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983861488","doi":"10.1071/wr06140","title":"Increasing the target-specificity of ERADICAT® for feral cat (Felis catus) control by encapsulating a toxicant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Toxicant; Pellet; Biology; Felis catus; Feral cat; Toxicology; CATS; Felis; Zoology; Animal science; Ecology; Veterinary medicine; Predation; Toxicity; Chemistry; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03154881625757824,"gpt":0.3585682800367027,"spread":0.3270194637791245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006711149,0.000198221,0.0002930748,0.0001620327,0.0004546265,0.00007846585,0.0007167743,0.0002381079,0.00004066921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001780185,0.0001559125,0.0001578566,0.0004031785,0.0005748941,0.00001065744,0.000227456,0.0004132207,0.000009487364],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001192468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003598575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008037133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008668897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964449,0.0005616426,0.0004768429,0.0005441903,0.0008235591,0.001148874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973805,0.0008957817,0.0001189387,0.000682884,0.0006426949,0.0002792219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001227868,0.0001323298,0.05200488,0.00004535341,0.00008065959,0.000003884704,0.0001479913,0.00001252922,0.9334574,0.0000801948,0.01156038,0.001246485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004526106,0.001691986,0.1073099,0.0001146545,0.00003725844,0.0001948338,0.001217269,0.00318606,0.7514793,0.0001983757,0.1292436,0.0008007882],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928146,0.0007164834,0.00294992,0.001490557,0.00006524209,0.001001776,0.0003189903,0.00001198246,0.0006304728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967697,0.00009676113,0.001730972,0.0002350041,0.0005181464,0.00006609832,0.0002018489,0.00004447327,0.0003370159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1819782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6357927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596638026","doi":"10.1071/wr16130","title":"Mitigation reduces road mortality of a threatened rattlesnake","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Queen's University; Laurentian University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Fencing; Threatened species; Context (archaeology); Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Habitat; Computer science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1307331155958232,"gpt":0.4193402297351664,"spread":0.2886071141393433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001250397,0.00009114295,0.00014089,0.00006336572,0.0007387594,0.000139812,0.0005359277,0.00007226068,0.001264952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005051657,0.00008101643,0.00006463546,0.0001630631,0.000727091,0.0006416595,0.0002841195,0.0002159797,0.0004291418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001099496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004840326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005562619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005014337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982033,0.0001646527,0.0002575128,0.0003042376,0.0007733182,0.0002969156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987864,0.00006816642,0.0001617567,0.0007925397,0.00008739423,0.0001036914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004181332,0.0001497065,0.9360492,0.00001220316,0.00002844958,0.000004770149,0.0002402779,0.00005208078,0.02114572,0.0003757994,0.02022284,0.02167718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002034183,0.0000650552,0.9864393,0.00003933028,0.000006260789,0.000002544059,0.0001334989,0.0008611843,0.005532732,0.001120897,0.005504153,0.00009162824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577552,0.00001431699,0.0000249984,0.003488637,0.0001103265,0.0002259698,0.000008803575,0.00001705346,0.03835467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971081,0.00005221659,0.0002321603,0.00009049798,0.00008252669,0.00004618933,0.00001018547,0.00001038698,0.002367757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05039013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060250418","doi":"10.1071/wr10020","title":"Is there a conflict between cetacean conservation and marine renewable-energy developments?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"Marine Mammal Commission","keywords":"Renewable energy; Wildlife; Marine energy; Marine spatial planning; Fishery; Wind power; Marine conservation; Environmental resource management; Tidal power; Scale (ratio); Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Geography; Ecology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08170286668010912,"gpt":0.3322588069745695,"spread":0.2505559402944604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001184118,0.0001456389,0.0001915702,0.00005464012,0.0003939711,0.00007950314,0.0003300387,0.00009738171,0.005355022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001420366,0.0001275813,0.00002763256,0.0004411148,0.000413182,0.0001652221,0.001805752,0.0003666444,0.0003062924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007834569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003696456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06672107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02806067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979762,0.0001164334,0.0002210366,0.0004339445,0.0007481168,0.0005042751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991812,0.000200129,0.00004850108,0.0003154483,0.00004704442,0.0002076816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001187013,0.00002074738,0.9179973,0.00001734413,0.00002839615,0.000004925489,0.0001246638,4.953975e-7,0.0002746551,0.0001515905,0.05900769,0.02236035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001550487,0.00003322522,0.5144575,0.000006150631,0.000003327768,0.000002155829,0.00002514695,0.00005482503,0.0001617948,0.0003603058,0.4846554,0.00008514924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8596733,0.0000717273,0.00001680047,0.004393954,0.00003197022,0.0002022751,0.000007732263,0.00003258637,0.1355696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822845,0.0009224879,0.001435074,0.001924618,0.0001150565,0.00004614863,0.00001791117,0.0000274248,0.01322672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4256477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955542,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018208871","doi":"10.1071/wr03087","title":"An evaluation of transect, plot and aerial survey techniques to monitor the spatial pattern and status of the bilby (Macrotis lagotis) in the Tanami Desert","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Aerial survey; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Physical geography; Remote sensing; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07272072530183193,"gpt":0.367904976030357,"spread":0.2951842507285251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007300691,0.00007552982,0.0001073049,0.0000509447,0.0001891328,0.00002643993,0.0003492391,0.00007173088,0.00008237841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003841352,0.00004191359,0.0000158507,0.0003807535,0.0004992823,0.0001382012,0.0001065008,0.0002172742,0.000003396487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008168315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005812053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02978368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09556407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958739,0.002601919,0.0002152699,0.0002051139,0.0008258262,0.0002780044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990422,0.0004826378,0.00004985309,0.0003095632,0.00006243971,0.00005336388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007470428,0.00007262772,0.9253556,0.00000395028,0.00000425058,1.90187e-7,0.001943683,0.0001044122,0.001686859,0.000006900673,0.0004400176,0.07030687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002696953,0.0001981748,0.9953436,0.00001295203,0.000006906076,0.000001664216,0.0002562404,0.002347155,0.001132543,0.0001162977,0.0002673369,0.00004742908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941299,0.0000341638,0.00006942592,0.004611867,0.00002820577,0.001011787,0.00002812132,0.000004984172,0.00008155478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993398,0.00006682943,0.00006307801,0.0003495459,0.00005523358,0.0001053476,0.000004306387,0.000007104554,0.000008719117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07025944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9766771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133607498","doi":"10.1071/wr15064","title":"Mixed stock analysis of a resident green turtle, Chelonia mydas, population in New Caledonia links rookeries in the South Pacific","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"New Zealand Aid Programme; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Marine Fisheries Service; Griffith University","keywords":"Rookery; Fishery; Foraging; Population; mtDNA control region; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Sea turtle; Turtle (robot); Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1275967886339754,"gpt":0.3395149088406152,"spread":0.2119181202066398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002652718,0.00008807894,0.0001937525,0.0003109576,0.00006728569,0.00002664516,0.0003472029,0.000193449,0.000105765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003185862,0.00006461087,0.00004994002,0.002168657,0.000199299,0.0001583998,0.0001388233,0.0004663166,0.00006221144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002016254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009371193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0536139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06715789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977075,0.0007533006,0.0003035115,0.000271612,0.0006627414,0.0003012817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992974,0.0001728455,0.00006910291,0.0003502348,0.00002625524,0.00008415549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001082277,0.00003232391,0.9892643,0.000003819357,0.00001942715,0.000005042231,0.006605019,0.0006263582,0.00007481897,0.0001150511,0.001493385,0.001652224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002791125,0.00006481688,0.993215,0.00001278829,0.00001811758,6.266177e-7,0.002523269,0.001807207,0.00001360021,0.0009100674,0.001085754,0.00006958755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995499,0.0001186977,0.00002747173,0.003518475,0.00002505179,0.0002804485,0.00000462179,0.000007900026,0.0005183711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985271,0.00001327586,0.000107599,0.0001057946,0.00003134431,0.00002344882,0.00003499176,0.000005372784,0.001151074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01354399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9526882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999129668","doi":"10.1071/wr12184","title":"Spatial relationships of sympatric wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (C. latrans) with woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) during the calving season in a human-modified boreal landscape","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Canis; Predation; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Population; Ursus; Bog; Context (archaeology); Boreal; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02612359956909368,"gpt":0.2614029597949405,"spread":0.2352793602258469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00113699,0.0001527416,0.0002177251,0.0001577285,0.0006535545,0.00007057266,0.0002487247,0.0001692447,0.0002624392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001550414,0.0001078481,0.00003342921,0.0006478687,0.0005605447,0.0003038936,0.0001370157,0.0006831673,0.00001807599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005634455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04090075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03367782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977822,0.0005192845,0.0002815278,0.0003560913,0.0005652015,0.000495708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988517,0.0006203704,0.00007160577,0.0002851139,0.00005069791,0.0001205646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009102267,0.00005157777,0.9964923,0.00003028324,0.00002008893,0.000006354334,0.001447848,0.0007175889,0.0002586177,0.00009804813,0.000502873,0.000283349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001068804,0.0001123527,0.9949082,0.00004641599,0.00001439361,0.00001202788,0.0006347738,0.002726878,0.00003810005,0.0002535766,0.00005212121,0.0001323662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961678,0.0001317997,0.00003955845,0.001615082,0.00002656455,0.0006971768,0.00001624712,0.00001987339,0.001285851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999379,0.00005737333,0.0000508385,0.00005306883,0.00005157042,0.0001335231,0.00002471212,0.00001757378,0.0002323216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007222936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.983955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}