{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":277,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":277,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"96305924bf00","filters":{"venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice"}},"results":[{"id":"W2775761272","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5008","title":"ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND JUSTICE SYSTEM INTEGRATION: BRITISH COLUMBIA’S CIVIL RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Online dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Proposition; Transformational leadership; Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Mediation; Computer science; Public relations; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Shannon Salter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03744388637335819,"gpt":0.2821928654557117,"spread":0.2447489790823535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004133031,0.0001839086,0.0003371053,0.0001752888,0.001185313,0.00352873,0.0006961131,0.0001471649,0.0001626678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006693747,0.0002563382,0.00009414623,0.0002706929,0.0001788628,0.002780267,0.0005625893,0.0002284348,0.00007737696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001115999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000605498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01913701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05196473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981678,0.00002588571,0.0005036371,0.0004737923,0.0004523966,0.0003765646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982217,0.0000534035,0.0005861603,0.0005757787,0.0004921671,0.00007081328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001148831,0.002799197,0.02527444,0.0159613,0.0005335314,0.0002432416,0.0003124147,0.002929547,0.002939378,0.1504652,0.6923313,0.1050617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002021729,0.00007323806,0.6821976,0.001880916,0.002342778,0.00004640148,0.001577249,0.06452312,0.00002043673,0.0002767635,0.2442889,0.0007507965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5440305,0.0007675863,0.02802139,0.007334477,0.006435485,0.002472413,0.000454802,0.0008270624,0.4096563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933242,0.00006202677,0.0005512233,0.0006388286,0.002381538,0.00003959936,0.00008622224,0.0000376594,0.002878751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6569232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553331921","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4683","title":"MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE:  RELATIONAL AUTONOMY AND DECISION-MAKING BY ADULTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Volition (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Individualism; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Eniola Salami","is_ca":true},{"name":"Bonnie Lashewicz","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04227486848726325,"gpt":0.3394451055679871,"spread":0.2971702370807239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003734955,0.0001324682,0.0001671901,0.00002624303,0.0005376362,0.0001361508,0.0003682068,0.00006076315,0.00006220577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001389872,0.00008316562,0.00002536463,0.0001894692,0.0006486049,0.0005450113,0.0002454997,0.0001052572,0.00001655159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002388663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000219587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001571342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001135789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998607,0.0000623299,0.0002057582,0.0002364867,0.0006497623,0.0002386484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986553,0.0007924038,0.00009837381,0.00009515582,0.0002235503,0.0001351995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008257247,0.0001592916,0.3171429,0.0001387379,0.0002276388,0.000005194346,0.630873,0.0005311326,0.00003126342,0.008602902,0.02211082,0.01935137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001210277,0.0001417836,0.445348,0.0006969926,0.0002235846,0.000003232689,0.4425949,0.0001635997,0.00006542211,0.0009122621,0.1080092,0.000630716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765624,0.0003276246,0.0001235429,0.004419277,0.0001293843,0.0005406325,0.00001960318,0.00004147162,0.01783602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926,0.00001288928,0.006357607,0.0002173164,0.000144776,0.00003988449,0.000002449156,0.00001039327,0.000614746],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1882782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4135117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605232142","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4807","title":"OUTSIDER EDUCATION: INDIGENOUS LAW AND LAND-BASED LEARNING","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Political science; Indigenous education; Humanities; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Ethnology; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"John Borrows","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07382627404369328,"gpt":0.4329613192899427,"spread":0.3591350452462495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004708562,0.00006781798,0.0001008744,0.00008338522,0.001422606,0.0008251603,0.0004189931,0.00006483132,0.0002734488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001533433,0.00007170731,0.00001903442,0.0001194534,0.0002016004,0.001087123,0.0000633276,0.0002057413,0.00005918813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003510858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001171411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02007595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002908835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992326,0.00007353081,0.0001536438,0.0001527298,0.0002260934,0.0001613657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989316,0.000167053,0.0002307259,0.000250436,0.0002986457,0.0001214718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001796961,0.0009407889,0.4144194,0.0004888664,0.000104673,0.000006625017,0.1186938,0.0004588815,0.0004024637,0.379243,0.01850055,0.06656129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002413381,0.00003823762,0.1089182,0.00007086382,0.000104689,7.857842e-7,0.003395925,0.0000161001,0.0002638957,0.0006587047,0.8860953,0.0001959352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2326118,0.00009589805,0.0001774492,0.04033698,0.001110777,0.0004457507,0.000004663028,0.00005743128,0.7251593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902824,0.00001257699,0.001030137,0.003888795,0.0004839319,0.00002186553,0.000003156433,0.000009541212,0.004267604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8675948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602983245","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4810","title":"DECOLONIZING AND INDIGENIZING: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Humanities; Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jeffery Hewitt","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.10028188575884,"gpt":0.3877295488309621,"spread":0.2874476630721222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004127771,0.00008124946,0.0001529051,0.000009786563,0.002763791,0.0007842596,0.0004048045,0.0001289537,0.00005994307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001370586,0.00008078375,0.00005322877,0.00003620527,0.000330545,0.001080781,0.0001373205,0.0001102814,0.00001061776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003253315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001666351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006566097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001766632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991889,0.00003377383,0.0001534591,0.0001912009,0.0001896667,0.0002430037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990895,0.0001986847,0.0001517175,0.0002314201,0.0001858638,0.0001427454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002473192,0.00004841866,0.003045202,0.0001384961,0.00006280823,0.000002835551,0.02384333,0.00001562127,0.001061739,0.9510761,0.02014146,0.0005392096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002746193,0.0002621761,0.04323861,0.0004898255,0.001104109,0.000004601688,0.03745227,0.00006103455,0.01164846,0.2681765,0.6335617,0.001254585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6712168,0.001195965,0.0003606928,0.05493608,0.002958248,0.003801818,0.0001592608,0.0002180467,0.2651531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912208,0.00007994134,0.004469311,0.002025367,0.0006435047,0.00005000553,0.000001195928,0.00001128203,0.001498595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6828997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1832272874","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4369","title":"STRATEGIES OF LEGAL RUPTURE: THE POLITICS OF JUDGMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Brenna Bhandar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04672239609787617,"gpt":0.3550110150727949,"spread":0.3082886189749188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003510419,0.00006320909,0.0001297543,0.00005562053,0.0001303201,0.00004431737,0.0005445149,0.00004479592,0.0003159463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005601368,0.0000447936,0.00005464882,0.00006611415,0.0002813419,0.0004332889,0.00007171264,0.00006843301,0.00001170053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002913019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001786766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002424996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000249953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989707,0.00005868161,0.0002285269,0.00006840059,0.0004713164,0.0002023397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992684,0.0001483171,0.0001548725,0.0001397466,0.00022208,0.00006654922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001059913,0.0000681945,0.0003501832,0.00005030855,0.00002305768,2.480011e-7,0.004776791,0.00004405981,0.0002563059,0.9935264,0.000867178,0.000026683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001167672,0.0005156325,0.212663,0.0005584806,0.001262346,0.000003642703,0.03934095,0.00005155459,0.06823959,0.1437763,0.5316005,0.0008202716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6614657,0.0001185219,0.0001189351,0.0008526408,0.0004878609,0.0002065538,0.00002258924,0.000009762432,0.3367174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947446,0.000004568326,0.0001683333,0.0001446649,0.0005925752,0.000003910041,0.000001127416,0.000005614925,0.004334619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.84975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3665884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265698276","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4411","title":"WE ARE ALL HERE TO STAY? INDIGENEITY, MIGRATION, AND ‘DECOLONIZING’ THE TREATY RIGHT TO BE HERE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Foregrounding; Indigenous; Treaty; Colonialism; Decolonization; Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; History; Politics; Ecology; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Amar Bhatia","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0399798012215485,"gpt":0.3347082536826407,"spread":0.2947284524610922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005648672,0.0001843242,0.0002518606,0.0001608927,0.00243597,0.000367395,0.0007628474,0.0001538311,0.0004923549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005581597,0.0001304475,0.00004527716,0.0004968267,0.0001298275,0.0004935589,0.00002631052,0.0001476484,0.0002624952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001763252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001929238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1557794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8204174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980113,0.0002198904,0.000345291,0.0003764858,0.0004788075,0.0005682607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982485,0.0002633428,0.0001722299,0.0003701444,0.0004399754,0.0005057728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005304179,0.0002797252,0.02435947,0.0002505048,0.00007000002,0.000004342237,0.9418648,0.00007643771,0.00005243446,0.007819866,0.02398706,0.001182335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001712482,0.0001660338,0.06878014,0.00009746683,0.000115263,0.000001364607,0.04169142,0.000004861564,0.0007034911,0.0005792906,0.8873858,0.0003036229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9371131,0.0002194527,0.00002918701,0.03080086,0.0004780424,0.002121493,0.00002633486,0.00004698775,0.02916452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730483,0.001084804,0.0008970372,0.004055773,0.001163301,0.00008176149,0.000007642801,0.00003664837,0.01962474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9001734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122188266","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4419","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR ALL: TOWARDS AN “EXPANSIVE VISION” OF JUSTICE AND TECHNOLOGY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Economic Justice; Deliverable; Software deployment; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Economics; Management","authors":[{"name":"Jane Bailey","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jacquelyn Burkell","is_ca":true},{"name":"Graham Reynolds","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07498148193957802,"gpt":0.4503946477101648,"spread":0.3754131657705868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007350256,0.0001855601,0.0003323328,0.0006061725,0.0003836376,0.0005164847,0.001230179,0.0002231529,0.0005064008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006390215,0.0001899507,0.00004085995,0.001558971,0.0002853739,0.003240721,0.0003068545,0.0002578887,0.00005987537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006900226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007936989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004992337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007251681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980182,0.0001196582,0.0005349712,0.0004371733,0.0004565159,0.0004334762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958128,0.0007649066,0.0003491929,0.0004363456,0.002298506,0.0003382649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008199079,0.002377954,0.003107518,0.004865439,0.0004325647,0.000007554972,0.109576,0.0008511915,0.03364405,0.3806949,0.3032651,0.1603578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002043339,0.001770111,0.05004531,0.0004772178,0.005163248,0.000008487166,0.1239959,0.0006555317,0.01413933,0.0123275,0.7877972,0.001576836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.597434,0.0002228755,0.01096568,0.2958251,0.003355094,0.006018414,0.0001674427,0.0002968239,0.08571456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731207,0.00006922212,0.01595746,0.008143539,0.0006478351,0.0003514035,0.00001315192,0.0000409733,0.001655651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4845321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7745966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122308799","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4360","title":"THE “NAKED FACE” OF SECULAR EXCLUSION: BILL 94 AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF BELIEF","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Political science; Sociology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Pascale Fournier","is_ca":true},{"name":"Erica See","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02899525982252284,"gpt":0.3223177436575149,"spread":0.2933224838349921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007360323,0.00005968005,0.0001438533,0.00002940588,0.0002940272,0.00002114027,0.0003428428,0.00004221908,0.00003964854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006655884,0.00003284011,0.00003699925,0.0002130494,0.001567371,0.0001733802,0.000148588,0.00005442024,0.000002375536],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001588709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002381268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001560574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005843883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990314,0.0001488607,0.0002257654,0.00007048115,0.0003524784,0.0001709743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987092,0.0006698816,0.000199087,0.0001620807,0.0001867433,0.00007297631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004708851,0.00002805898,0.002716866,0.00003904467,0.00002232476,8.941605e-8,0.005028828,0.00007049603,0.0001486418,0.9906223,0.0004237153,0.0008524944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001519846,0.0001397769,0.0541207,0.0002425347,0.0007201617,0.00000313614,0.01660297,0.0001455933,0.004656701,0.005199272,0.9162544,0.0003948788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5480852,0.004093272,0.006138744,0.01667552,0.0009822514,0.001771073,0.00008047569,0.00003893118,0.4221345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983402,0.0001813827,0.0002385819,0.0002912653,0.0001924236,0.000006027655,0.000001146888,0.000004352396,0.0007445408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5775042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603518243","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4815","title":"DABAADENDIZIWIN: PRACTICES OF HUMILITY IN A MULTI-JURIDICAL LEGAL LANDSCAPE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Canada Council for the Arts; University of Victoria; Michigan State University","keywords":"Humility; Charter; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Pride; Navajo; Harmony (color); Indigenous; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Art","authors":[{"name":"Lindsay Borrows","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1277089180900469,"gpt":0.4497432287293902,"spread":0.3220343106393433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001049992,0.0001149405,0.0002932412,0.0002002485,0.0003432582,0.0001979077,0.001296575,0.000141987,0.0001823005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002729144,0.0001153229,0.00009393722,0.0001996004,0.0005658598,0.000921101,0.0002953471,0.0002157402,0.00001711512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002167433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002699577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0112714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005256889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983688,0.0001312745,0.0003599405,0.0002733645,0.0004886967,0.0003779036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982873,0.0002102143,0.0006338836,0.0005137093,0.0001583537,0.0001965123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004872875,0.001449574,0.9232886,0.0008373717,0.0001285486,0.00008576801,0.04571824,0.00006126873,0.0007013665,0.01768404,0.005821676,0.003736246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000992784,0.0001079664,0.9592393,0.0002080246,0.00016517,8.708732e-7,0.01374947,0.0001482436,0.001063997,0.0004768745,0.02352971,0.0003175485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.848354,0.0001324982,0.00005769302,0.00247315,0.0003512598,0.000352388,0.00003093397,0.00002213447,0.1482259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998337,0.00002313903,0.0008160135,0.0001051331,0.0002363629,0.00001044192,0.000001591954,0.00001075205,0.0004595841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.149983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788576041","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5023","title":"ANTICIPATING AND MANAGING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL COST OF CIVIL LITIGATION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Value (mathematics); Economic Justice; Public relations; State (computer science); Social psychology; Business; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Michaela Keet","is_ca":true},{"name":"Heather Heavin","is_ca":true},{"name":"Shawna Sparrow","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1742108170773083,"gpt":0.5146753510708778,"spread":0.3404645339935695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001306476,0.00008335023,0.0002095473,0.00005887212,0.000248392,0.0000143113,0.0002972138,0.00009868563,0.001316127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002803189,0.00005591272,0.00002245495,0.0002110511,0.0002903998,0.0001941996,0.0002363134,0.0003038368,0.00006847471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001279772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003773086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000232773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009615073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984941,0.0003357942,0.0004592961,0.0002015384,0.0002592593,0.0002499725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973165,0.001749358,0.0002786226,0.000301283,0.0002452703,0.0001089234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001944825,0.001061216,0.6502459,0.01177824,0.0002329965,0.0000161938,0.103031,0.00004645398,0.01232215,0.03987494,0.06201773,0.1174284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001346698,0.0008871835,0.9140894,0.002263166,0.0005558114,0.00000279299,0.02122978,0.002085967,0.001464341,0.003700668,0.05204672,0.0003274852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428641,0.00004774169,0.0008396026,0.009635816,0.0003605957,0.000704198,0.000005357937,0.00002431991,0.04551823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953096,0.00002054532,0.0006054416,0.00326159,0.000575056,0.00003726015,0.000001217623,0.000009145414,0.0001801735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2638435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1874830625","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4410","title":"RACIALIZED IN JUSTICE: THE LEGAL AND EXTRA-LEGAL STRUGGLES OF MIGRANT AGRICULTURAL WORKERS IN CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Capitalism; Political science; Supreme court; Racism; Labour law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Freedom of association; Law; Human rights; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Adrian A. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01723035007138209,"gpt":0.2846411795401113,"spread":0.2674108294687292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000281082,0.0001078768,0.0002191067,0.0000794424,0.0001236363,0.0001110381,0.0004644133,0.00005024609,0.0001889515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002324884,0.00007336195,0.00002607764,0.0004969208,0.0001457805,0.00048027,0.00009628291,0.0001411333,8.510472e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001334083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007505505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986511,0.0001300454,0.0003405067,0.0001706223,0.0003989193,0.0003087466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992859,0.0002331508,0.0001282859,0.0001321153,0.0001147418,0.0001058471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000585239,0.0008252779,0.6377038,0.0008612488,0.0002861021,0.0000986458,0.09384531,0.004588454,0.01324201,0.153365,0.05900503,0.03559384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004330681,0.00001723059,0.9502866,0.00009986071,0.00007447714,2.857089e-7,0.03871606,0.00003457206,0.000148146,0.00005311834,0.01001103,0.000125591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885511,0.0001553545,0.000003042265,0.002908198,0.0002617304,0.0005245978,0.00001959379,0.000005374972,0.007571043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987736,0.00003858277,0.00010053,0.0004039181,0.00009876115,0.00002732191,0.00000161038,0.000006222333,0.0005494102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3125827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2991613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196881958","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6425","title":"Where The Sidewalk Ends: The Governance Of Waterfront Toronto’s Sidewalk Labs Deal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Accountability; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Corporation; General partnership; Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Municipal corporation; Local government; Public relations; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Alexandra Flynn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Mariana Valverde","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05027003628671882,"gpt":0.341529518582782,"spread":0.2912594822960631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000472359,0.0001503807,0.0002640056,0.000009648898,0.0002696508,0.0001318235,0.001644804,0.00008445459,0.000958333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004315913,0.00008860749,0.0001016017,0.0002121241,0.000315879,0.000495224,0.0003120821,0.000164775,0.00008673609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006791605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002062369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05901607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03079793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981765,0.0002142941,0.0003462034,0.0002316931,0.0006670352,0.0003642703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987205,0.0004032985,0.0002336648,0.0003194232,0.0001578817,0.0001651968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006570258,0.0002172625,0.007774448,0.001000052,0.0003272371,0.00002535859,0.5578637,0.0006734967,0.006149242,0.1066791,0.2932514,0.02538167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002781275,0.0001437302,0.0128151,0.0001100564,0.0002031118,5.835116e-7,0.01238663,0.00004204718,0.006559081,0.000338617,0.9668968,0.0002261525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2411253,0.007166916,0.0000649415,0.192275,0.0009195689,0.001409899,0.0001625794,0.0001355553,0.5567403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907663,0.0004349523,0.0001249101,0.003466797,0.001369796,0.00001983901,7.718003e-7,0.00001769824,0.003798922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7496411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592714842","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4842","title":"RECONCILIATION IN TRANSLATION: INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS AND CANADA’S TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Mainstream; Sensibility; Law; Sociology; Political science; State (computer science); Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Kirsten Anker","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0643599226041288,"gpt":0.3299319654745551,"spread":0.2655720428704262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000381829,0.00007242063,0.00013013,0.00001587813,0.0008424913,0.0002050939,0.0002222282,0.0001081253,0.00004833592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002323955,0.00007456302,0.00001719607,0.00005943304,0.0001277675,0.000786195,0.00001815032,0.0001151609,7.248015e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001171441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004670244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3523564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.806258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991963,0.00006821459,0.0001804662,0.0001657558,0.0002412803,0.0001480198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994188,0.0001214611,0.0001366218,0.0001340747,0.00007859095,0.000110432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004560304,0.0003712246,0.1874289,0.001219424,0.0001484647,0.00003993487,0.5629004,0.0004172013,0.001551247,0.04580336,0.02418353,0.1754803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001198535,0.00008085788,0.8432825,0.0002593649,0.0001494592,0.000002594723,0.01598435,0.0001540775,0.0004181337,0.001543603,0.1365412,0.0003852958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429275,0.0002316259,0.00002786959,0.007008798,0.0003493051,0.0003901923,0.00004169319,0.00001511409,0.04900794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983681,0.0003028067,0.0002661627,0.0001871438,0.0001840036,0.00001062381,0.000006115632,0.000005274147,0.0006697595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6558536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6519563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123808924","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5007","title":"DESIGNING ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Administration of justice; Administrative law; Adaptation (eye); Sociology; Law; Geography; Computer science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Lorne Sossin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2466356681062551,"gpt":0.5011033493798046,"spread":0.2544676812735495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008260603,0.00009615161,0.0001422653,0.0001093287,0.001590332,0.0009744912,0.001073312,0.00008240977,0.000786973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007710763,0.0001033251,0.00003717988,0.0002268144,0.0002658332,0.002193058,0.0001186908,0.0002413839,0.0002086469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005546011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001078344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002570338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006410276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987929,0.0001190876,0.0002476132,0.0002102215,0.0003795325,0.0002506477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979925,0.0005120293,0.0003938014,0.0004321054,0.0004920803,0.0001774732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004087661,0.0008175806,0.01142072,0.000559392,0.0002062646,0.00004457287,0.1196221,0.0001800982,0.007163516,0.6786096,0.1593814,0.02158593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006573102,0.0001809535,0.07827299,0.0002373774,0.001020686,0.000002694541,0.04897723,0.00003930524,0.009766467,0.002434342,0.857738,0.0006726287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02824825,0.00002744135,0.002660885,0.04540251,0.001682268,0.0004648979,0.00001309134,0.00006185355,0.9214388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983718,0.00001787165,0.006052669,0.001533155,0.0008559917,0.0000255902,0.00000190248,0.00001262105,0.007782178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607043875","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4559","title":"Antony Anghie, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; International law; Law; Political science; Politics; Globalization; Colonialism; Perspective (graphical); Power (physics); Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Edward Cervini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02913107405001754,"gpt":0.3479813354688107,"spread":0.3188502614187931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004113493,0.00006601843,0.000138314,0.0000561368,0.0001802621,0.0001197117,0.0005510494,0.00004514402,0.000525212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001064841,0.00004820373,0.00004672396,0.00005116819,0.0003592867,0.0003173559,0.00007167392,0.00006282216,0.000005703556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002488357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004903932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005762941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002861251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990907,0.00006049175,0.000205979,0.0001236056,0.0003962099,0.000122992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994273,0.0001107787,0.000135204,0.0001041245,0.000194249,0.00002839905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001515278,0.00002250524,0.00004625065,0.000008435427,0.00001808266,0.00000124549,0.003232583,0.00001342608,0.0001038768,0.99578,0.0004164574,0.0002056043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003307333,0.0001871359,0.02415472,0.0003745857,0.0003355621,0.000004997178,0.001539488,0.0002319084,0.003157084,0.8196864,0.1465365,0.0004843456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1872737,0.0000621072,0.00006170371,0.005119744,0.0005576729,0.0002662081,0.00002356214,0.00001894607,0.8066163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956744,0.00001231226,0.0001940112,0.002205101,0.0005586434,0.000002705774,0.00000156625,0.000004271118,0.001346944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8084007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5750703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788672079","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5019","title":"THE INACCESSIBILITY OF JUSTICE FOR MIGRANT WORKERS: A CAPABILITIES-BASED PERSPECTIVE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Perspective (graphical); Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Migrant workers; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Empirical research; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economic growth; Economics; Social science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Bethany Hastie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05370722291969057,"gpt":0.397786856034735,"spread":0.3440796331150444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00121948,0.0001190628,0.0002019559,0.00008474763,0.000543168,0.0001115031,0.0009710682,0.0000759504,0.0001439718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002772096,0.0000930969,0.0001185948,0.0003609363,0.0009551187,0.0002986486,0.00008590216,0.00008302209,0.00001053077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000204048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000494508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01161001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008960589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983479,0.0001412541,0.0003582079,0.0002777661,0.000545815,0.0003290949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960643,0.001485924,0.0002117845,0.0003114258,0.001825322,0.0001012408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005771148,0.0009265454,0.01961991,0.001117659,0.0003416024,0.000002313328,0.07494832,0.0004709101,0.001374397,0.8668575,0.02619319,0.002376473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004504018,0.00288359,0.1134849,0.001227278,0.003060633,8.353879e-7,0.189859,0.00207593,0.03264975,0.04264299,0.6060573,0.001553779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7980087,0.0002607091,0.004729042,0.01245725,0.002327324,0.002663559,0.0002484891,0.00009474975,0.1792102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957165,0.000004015779,0.001130767,0.0004682424,0.0007322648,0.00007611735,0.000001890069,0.00001434043,0.001855934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8242145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578760388","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4308","title":"ADVANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE THROUGH GENERIC SOLUTIONS: THE RISK OF PERPETUATING EXCLUSION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Equity (law); Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Patricia Hughes","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1013267182539152,"gpt":0.315957939548271,"spread":0.2146312212943558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008920314,0.0001910206,0.000444922,0.0002315671,0.000544243,0.0002543162,0.001384769,0.00008965308,0.0006597284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001926091,0.0001807647,0.0001178009,0.0008019599,0.00007061262,0.001333504,0.001212448,0.0002593866,0.0002872742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001278113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007437624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005622522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002469085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982991,0.00007372523,0.0007764247,0.000280486,0.0001276214,0.0004426145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980108,0.0004997542,0.0006039556,0.0005572755,0.0002046006,0.0001235785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000511401,0.002099946,0.3376095,0.004403829,0.001624861,0.00001055526,0.1946762,0.08928108,0.006199843,0.06298032,0.1614742,0.1391282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009203457,0.0002561924,0.946154,0.0003980577,0.0004900327,0.000002653018,0.008783424,0.006794272,0.001228119,0.01514212,0.01881367,0.001017098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477348,0.0008463996,0.01616192,0.002749624,0.0006583378,0.0009737931,0.0000643618,0.00004057525,0.03077017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915546,0.0004576827,0.005908051,0.001322613,0.000242878,0.00006449073,0.000005498607,0.00003438436,0.0004097825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6085445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8499609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788940108","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5024","title":"THE SILENCING OF QUEER VOICES IN THE LITIGATION OVER TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY’S PROPOSED LAW SCHOOL","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Dissent; Queer theory; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Sarah E. Hamill","is_ca":false},{"name":"Pippa Feinstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04349477973641051,"gpt":0.3287682279239924,"spread":0.2852734481875818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006690171,0.0000562357,0.00009907566,0.00003949486,0.0005919241,0.00005946844,0.0005390071,0.00003940885,0.00003162204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003512325,0.00003795452,0.0000317162,0.0003394115,0.0008996225,0.0003276392,0.0001017796,0.00008381119,0.00001871761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005317797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000206781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02973303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0486897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990467,0.0001679477,0.0001492028,0.0001082202,0.0003773127,0.0001505703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991745,0.0003535349,0.0001068705,0.0001098033,0.0002175289,0.00003777071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004424097,0.0001736972,0.1337222,0.00009743297,0.0000917642,0.000007539232,0.05181611,0.00006544864,0.001276658,0.8090071,0.001442206,0.001857403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006909295,0.0001722629,0.8507352,0.0003345151,0.0002266316,3.946063e-7,0.0563857,0.00001682456,0.002609973,0.009150338,0.07941499,0.0002622633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8778399,0.0000694054,0.00003902434,0.002535862,0.0001775466,0.0003454714,0.000006781031,0.00001165215,0.1189744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990457,0.00003475332,0.00002128328,0.0003406454,0.0003134659,0.00000191797,2.948842e-7,0.000002108059,0.0002398323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7998568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9767281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610167096","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4888","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF THE SOUTH: INDIGENOUS WATER RIGHTS IN CHILE - ANOTHER STEP IN THE “CIVILIZING MISSION?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Centro de Recursos Hídricos para la Agricultura y la Minería; Universidad de Concepción; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Political science; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Colonialism; Realm; Law; Scholarship; International law; Human rights; Subject (documents); Indigenous rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Amaya Álvez Marín","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1037193026590334,"gpt":0.3821074223838061,"spread":0.2783881197247727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008245661,0.000108389,0.0002101072,0.0000810543,0.0008891957,0.0000809702,0.001471715,0.00006051071,0.00008992384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003975517,0.00005959915,0.00005667729,0.0001107643,0.001998449,0.0003265715,0.0003054398,0.0001637311,0.00001782017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005735764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00314273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01533742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985124,0.0002196586,0.000265697,0.0002016223,0.0005375877,0.0002630025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990739,0.0002464062,0.0001642204,0.0003569575,0.0001273182,0.00003121944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001503044,0.0004566756,0.1560912,0.0001803661,0.00007625946,0.0000238285,0.3271187,0.0007355549,0.0008254285,0.5126362,0.0004938901,0.001211592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006057231,0.0000364913,0.9516612,0.0007415487,0.00006755469,0.000001625792,0.01333068,0.00001056217,0.00197775,0.003131516,0.02819326,0.0002420396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8220252,0.000612462,0.00003071977,0.006238244,0.0004036201,0.0007766921,0.0000178373,0.000008719328,0.1698865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995109,0.00003749456,0.00004907147,0.000120427,0.0001483386,0.00001817441,3.0782e-7,0.000002431,0.0001128706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7955701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.855864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220704094","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4373","title":"INCOMMENSURABLE LEGAL CULTURES: INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS AND THE COLONIAL NARRATIVE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mythology; Ethnology; Narrative; Humanities; Sociology; History; Anthropology; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Literature; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Kirsten Manley‐Casimir","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02744455361919376,"gpt":0.3330571556791615,"spread":0.3056126020599678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000747047,0.0001214631,0.0002088805,0.00001259488,0.001453498,0.000253345,0.0004698776,0.0001429395,0.0001659171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001952082,0.00008389891,0.00007885375,0.0003001835,0.0007926511,0.001003261,0.0000709463,0.0002597058,0.00001982955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006510138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001470635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00256673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001091074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986365,0.0002581173,0.0001912325,0.0001491099,0.0003774308,0.0003875585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991552,0.0002692941,0.0001132339,0.0001421734,0.0001316801,0.000188463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001478563,0.0001569892,0.0006013672,0.0000441041,0.00008773169,0.000002046961,0.7626399,0.00002373191,0.0001129199,0.1867502,0.04924913,0.0001841092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001476851,0.0000932398,0.00893781,0.0000647031,0.0004152125,0.000009263803,0.151762,0.00000591946,0.0003253217,0.001841161,0.8347181,0.0003503654],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7511681,0.001208471,0.00003887016,0.02566344,0.001087038,0.001305012,0.00008667025,0.00008544522,0.219357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925997,0.0001448555,0.0002391116,0.002574904,0.001212289,0.00006146145,0.000005433569,0.00001054399,0.003151687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.785469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518541179","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4688","title":"GROUNDING ACCESS TO JUSTICE THEORY AND PRACTICE IN THE EXPERIENCES OF WOMEN ABUSED BY THEIR INTIMATE PARTNERS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Conceptualization; Economic Justice; Domestic violence; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Poison control; Law; Suicide prevention; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Janet Mosher","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08339928655449998,"gpt":0.4195457543918725,"spread":0.3361464678373725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007333874,0.0002026291,0.0003605299,0.0002059945,0.0002424688,0.0004322928,0.001722922,0.0001022664,0.00005447122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005728273,0.0001555284,0.00003577814,0.0009384203,0.0004860035,0.001836016,0.0003698391,0.0001850672,0.00001397643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001383872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002374865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001039599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004525133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967545,0.001032796,0.0004618703,0.0003832364,0.0007256402,0.0006419424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960824,0.002682243,0.000272154,0.0003401774,0.0003059848,0.0003170738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007861754,0.0001776671,0.0008335846,0.000178445,0.00003107083,0.000007879315,0.972837,0.0002039362,0.0005271781,0.01774221,0.004508674,0.002166213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004533635,0.0002042535,0.005083741,0.0001955416,0.000158513,0.000003016345,0.978023,0.00005349805,0.001113739,0.001100636,0.01327928,0.0003314222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.896923,0.0002830258,0.0008381993,0.0006174952,0.0005127396,0.0007936661,0.00001072809,0.00003563702,0.09998553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964244,0.0001437789,0.0003845257,0.002571545,0.0001532538,0.0001863143,0.000001584033,0.00001778792,0.0001167654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09986876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6857691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599494580","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4808","title":"LEARNING FROM BEAR-WALKER: INDIGENOUS LEGAL ORDERS AND INTERCULTURAL LEGAL EDUCATION IN CANADIAN LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal profession; Law; Legal education; Political science; Viewpoints; Legal research; Sociology; Empowerment; Legal realism","authors":[{"name":"H. Askew","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03796338000169707,"gpt":0.3857957892049488,"spread":0.3478324092032517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004719871,0.00009923859,0.0001381062,0.0001914783,0.00110322,0.001704214,0.0005617352,0.0001056465,0.0002508897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001985459,0.0001088452,0.00002145194,0.0001955186,0.0001688231,0.003155472,0.00007483327,0.0005034051,0.0000618188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002310347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004120427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9193725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988955,0.0001152196,0.0002291375,0.0002246358,0.0002196628,0.0003158839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989195,0.0001106839,0.0002025372,0.0002238137,0.0002537311,0.0002897431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002047291,0.0004945622,0.3440875,0.0001614341,0.0001414572,0.00002863016,0.2439499,0.0003755389,0.001353558,0.3251653,0.0150901,0.06894728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002539347,0.0000420541,0.200563,0.0001249607,0.00006680137,0.000001538644,0.03624951,0.00002420773,0.0001318014,0.0003177257,0.7619668,0.0002576774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7961298,0.00004698106,0.000005162163,0.01779178,0.0006884366,0.0002951152,0.000007700502,0.00001627624,0.1850188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941671,0.00002388106,0.0004063143,0.001661032,0.0004085845,0.00001808924,0.00001518456,0.00001111654,0.003288655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916627404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5690","title":"Freedom and Access to Housing: Three Conceptions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negative liberty; Premise; State (computer science); Power (physics); Property (philosophy); Law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Terry Skolnik","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1024829235516147,"gpt":0.3805958446446976,"spread":0.2781129210930829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003353739,0.0001278037,0.0002134026,0.000149182,0.0005079836,0.000495988,0.0009207643,0.00008496574,0.0008484651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003135095,0.0001024176,0.00003629231,0.0005062005,0.000532846,0.0008816152,0.000408611,0.0001064614,0.0001595331],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004356932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000162198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007848774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0132339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986703,0.00005541349,0.0002252795,0.0003134758,0.0003776198,0.0003579149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893,0.00009652298,0.00007945985,0.0002648355,0.0003003493,0.0003288103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00181896,0.001305826,0.1029188,0.0007890292,0.0005132231,0.00008789986,0.09543494,0.0006236106,0.02456111,0.3528064,0.2785405,0.1405997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006127256,0.0003889728,0.1055132,0.0001930268,0.000222419,0.000001313434,0.0008693013,0.0001205593,0.002204484,0.001393152,0.8879655,0.0005153122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6316828,0.0001697023,0.004277767,0.01726017,0.001231448,0.001371205,0.00004028983,0.0001858093,0.3437808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935985,0.00002533445,0.001108889,0.001802372,0.001520309,0.00001887224,0.000001016563,0.00001742408,0.001907282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.609425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165304286","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4418","title":"SHIFTING JUDICIAL CONCEPTIONS OF 'RECONCILIATION': GEOGRAPHIC COMMITMENTS UNDERPINNING ABORIGINAL RIGHTS DECISIONS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Underpinning; Power (physics); Identity (music); Sociology; Colonialism; Law; Political science; Politics; History; Aesthetics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Michael McCrossan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04326715924850702,"gpt":0.3733716521872018,"spread":0.3301044929386948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006411111,0.0001383195,0.0002780933,0.000348378,0.003005682,0.000108943,0.0006222986,0.0001414983,0.0008576444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005784261,0.0001271863,0.00008332436,0.0006917329,0.0003558447,0.0007283445,0.000007442707,0.0001690119,0.0001377798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001339908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003644761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1906475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1978836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979047,0.0002063306,0.0005757359,0.0002591556,0.0005991149,0.0004549244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997726,0.0006028017,0.0003746866,0.0002601581,0.0007750477,0.0002613151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006225568,0.0008442333,0.05225087,0.0002193984,0.0001811388,0.000002594908,0.4223228,0.0004615248,0.0001256905,0.518863,0.002460678,0.002205732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001510488,0.0003881808,0.425014,0.001005019,0.0006689966,0.000002111178,0.02266635,0.0001725699,0.0009109814,0.02895294,0.5177258,0.0009825076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8809537,0.00008192183,0.0006943906,0.0004394122,0.0009378043,0.000976711,0.00001938321,0.0000454191,0.1158513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957092,0.0003097988,0.002076532,0.0001356235,0.0006852201,0.00001729442,0.00001106943,0.00001370913,0.001041589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5152652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101070058","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4420","title":"MARGINALIZING TRANS MEDICAL EXPENSES: LINE-DRAWING EXERCISES IN TAX","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Business; Psychology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Samuel Singer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04237428838415885,"gpt":0.2819569027944253,"spread":0.2395826144102664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003099191,0.0001802417,0.00029161,0.0004080572,0.00007446855,0.0003361681,0.0006344629,0.00008971654,0.003204716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004575429,0.0001745498,0.00005981605,0.0006780969,0.00005485517,0.001886434,0.0002032644,0.0001789581,0.0005244085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002381482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005402119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002232125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003846483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984081,0.00001455787,0.0004624961,0.0003021085,0.0004985848,0.0003141762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991915,0.00009449632,0.0002486345,0.0002318171,0.0001858077,0.00004780243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001466027,0.003113897,0.3947029,0.01584771,0.0002364371,0.0007189575,0.006586068,0.01366381,0.07259353,0.05281457,0.1896036,0.2486525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008906577,0.0001488756,0.6433874,0.007492668,0.0008434794,0.00001825437,0.01063202,0.05867618,0.009859738,0.008634579,0.2474436,0.00395661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.931476,0.0001372968,0.002435576,0.00485739,0.0004699496,0.0007563,0.000002549693,0.0001213106,0.0597436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944065,0.00002104959,0.0003823586,0.003700125,0.0007596985,0.00006663974,0.000005796953,0.00003086402,0.0006270134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2486846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597031627","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4813","title":"STL’UL NUP: LEGAL LANDSCAPES OF THE HUL’QUMI’NUM MUSTIMUHW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Identity (music); Meaning (existential); Ethnology; Humanities; Relation (database); Law; Geography; Political science; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Ecology; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Morales","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05527603088047359,"gpt":0.3652601027752639,"spread":0.3099840718947904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000507994,0.0001777294,0.0003576618,0.0000426417,0.001464797,0.0003090519,0.002243354,0.0001308316,0.0002548335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002102189,0.0001228215,0.0001626717,0.0001654949,0.000648273,0.0007469075,0.0007805675,0.0002048925,0.00005004689],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007635538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001345587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01430376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005571512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980825,0.0001292567,0.0003351379,0.0002815055,0.0007635676,0.000408067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982399,0.0002339654,0.0004567229,0.0005779499,0.0003520804,0.0001393514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009818277,0.001496844,0.4476468,0.002583894,0.001564446,0.0000611537,0.2275186,0.00195681,0.0170423,0.08603594,0.1754082,0.03770313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008026697,0.00008519144,0.8335537,0.0003111698,0.0005041578,7.829158e-7,0.01115572,0.00004934627,0.004012038,0.0002585107,0.1488131,0.0004536058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8275552,0.0002157445,0.00001887318,0.0103495,0.001251005,0.0007214671,0.00004004967,0.00005247197,0.1597957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937594,0.00005684011,0.0002478027,0.0002342581,0.0006984296,0.00001945661,7.766903e-7,0.00001547228,0.004967546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3859068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594467543","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4841","title":"BUILDING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES TO CLIMATE CHANGE, DISASTERS, AND DISPLACEMENT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; University of Windsor","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Vulnerability (computing); Climate change; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Disaster risk reduction; Hazard; Psychological intervention; Forced migration; Political science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Computer science; Computer security; Refugee; Law; Economics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Jane McAdam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3758144962070173,"gpt":0.4016484913620534,"spread":0.02583399515503604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000521291,0.0001050306,0.0001363329,0.0001321475,0.0005367454,0.0005563659,0.0006474126,0.00005176435,0.00006217707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003521898,0.000110439,0.00002680069,0.00007772843,0.0001177239,0.001010812,0.0004036805,0.00005189756,0.00002134572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009093295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002572454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001302589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003791458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988598,0.00003467013,0.0001914625,0.0002670765,0.0003947891,0.0002522565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992494,0.00006913878,0.00019322,0.0002442023,0.0000857822,0.0001582459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008603113,0.0005044607,0.2227507,0.0009657274,0.0002013081,0.0000140676,0.3294268,0.0006355877,0.004351014,0.299432,0.004476712,0.1363813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001436834,0.0002429804,0.8742259,0.0009625255,0.0004333977,0.000001921544,0.04143239,0.00272159,0.002162026,0.001250622,0.07411087,0.001018927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441438,0.0000565232,0.001714742,0.01841761,0.001090751,0.00110254,0.00006641882,0.00004874332,0.03335888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947059,0.0001150329,0.003540945,0.0003870387,0.0008068789,0.0000897541,0.000007143017,0.00001564739,0.0003317069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6514752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5365049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883554158","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4421","title":"LOOKING FOR QUALITY: THE EMPIRICAL DEBATE IN ACCESS TO JUSTICE RESEARCH","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; CONTEST; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Leitch","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5530687811844535,"gpt":0.6007818828052836,"spread":0.04771310162083009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005015777,0.0001168152,0.0002160466,0.0005243783,0.0007473363,0.001381671,0.001687823,0.0001191139,0.0007830605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01687089,0.00009866351,0.00004873297,0.00282987,0.0002004914,0.00209698,0.0003467244,0.0005197135,0.0002607381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001924627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001052944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01917818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00605962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970404,0.0006638727,0.0005268207,0.0003499576,0.0008348802,0.0005840749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924569,0.005346541,0.0001623159,0.0004103524,0.001398584,0.0002253591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003924367,0.0008349626,0.01822215,0.0006440767,0.0001100899,0.000003676481,0.1931829,0.001301939,0.00171816,0.1427788,0.6069073,0.03390357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004091516,0.00008937766,0.1642025,0.000148909,0.0001945102,5.084471e-7,0.04869923,0.0002707589,0.0003999947,0.003676884,0.7815534,0.0003547083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4596044,0.0000484972,0.0009991059,0.3992827,0.001307,0.003307822,0.00001965488,0.00005936813,0.1353715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761761,0.00001916276,0.001124126,0.01708362,0.0008994228,0.0006673503,0.000004847396,0.0000258439,0.003999496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5165718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122700238","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4480","title":"Dizzying Dialogue: Canadian Courts and the Continuing Justification of the Dispossession Of Aboriginal People","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Doctrine; Supreme court; Conciliation; Law; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Arbitration","authors":[{"name":"D’Arcy Vermette","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03848112590642711,"gpt":0.3252010623644886,"spread":0.2867199364580615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006329672,0.0000851083,0.0002185517,0.00003943761,0.0003388927,0.00003560832,0.0005183195,0.00005881202,0.00004113857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007228157,0.0000494204,0.00005151862,0.0002226868,0.0006263696,0.0002268475,0.00009388272,0.00009643639,0.000001615712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005645095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001287116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4261197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1853325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989223,0.0001630171,0.0002577208,0.0001361696,0.0003197873,0.0002010129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988956,0.0002911525,0.0002756415,0.0001693901,0.0002761061,0.00009205119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002737411,0.00008771555,0.180625,0.0004355948,0.0001034006,0.000001159113,0.7456391,0.00006125478,0.002753231,0.06336348,0.0009445256,0.005711788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004284804,0.00001814922,0.973573,0.0002398116,0.0003202798,2.608785e-7,0.01989733,0.0000397774,0.001806193,0.0003035597,0.003251398,0.0001218057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988516,0.0002066234,0.00002761721,0.001587885,0.0003167319,0.0005298135,0.00001672835,0.000008179021,0.008790416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993805,0.0001125019,0.0001526839,0.00005395237,0.00009925338,0.0000156003,7.080879e-7,0.000005942592,0.0001789093],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7929479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.829533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323209304","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4481","title":"The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Implications for the Equality Rights of Canadians with Disabilities: The Case for Education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Political science; Balance (ability); Convention; Order (exchange); Human rights; Law; Public administration; Psychology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ravi Malhotra","is_ca":true},{"name":"Robin F. Hansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1167859931618604,"gpt":0.3710109524898417,"spread":0.2542249593279813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006091733,0.0001060794,0.0001357508,0.00005254824,0.002686715,0.00006119839,0.0004181861,0.00003903539,0.00001921142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093278,0.00004116077,0.00005548244,0.000449688,0.001392216,0.0001760698,0.00003331939,0.00007049489,3.652874e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008315693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001815243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1771471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4103093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990693,0.0001770099,0.0002315262,0.0001546802,0.0001809544,0.0001865553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921894,0.006553851,0.0002244609,0.000265294,0.0007109432,0.00005606953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001109438,0.0001000707,0.0008589127,0.000109939,0.0001246646,3.030825e-8,0.1461216,0.00002790645,0.000009055123,0.8515449,0.0008892074,0.0001027999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005400964,0.0004787649,0.03372892,0.0002099757,0.001262084,0.000003465041,0.910684,0.0001584612,0.0006299256,0.01218732,0.03984112,0.0002758876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601492,0.0001190346,0.0001760105,0.02464636,0.0001136251,0.003994614,0.0004680024,0.00001414543,0.01031901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975496,0.0000172186,0.0001014113,0.00008525232,0.00007760622,0.0008104052,0.000004939639,0.000006740021,0.001346838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8393576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549857026","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4681","title":"ADVOCACY FATIGUE: SELF-CARE, PROTEST, AND EDUCATIONAL EQUITY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Diverse Education Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Educational equity; Compassion; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Art; Law","authors":[{"name":"Carrie Griffin Basas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1379444325029854,"gpt":0.435669304331348,"spread":0.2977248718283626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003760658,0.00008575241,0.0001336637,0.00007993855,0.0002595146,0.0001243397,0.0003537049,0.00005330774,0.0001284915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005086157,0.00007169962,0.00002593379,0.000265789,0.0001575764,0.0004044485,0.0003025334,0.0000694602,0.00006169775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001171119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001006549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001394141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000123966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989274,0.00004239317,0.0001648221,0.0001878199,0.0004591355,0.0002184843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989206,0.00008439336,0.0001003567,0.0001329682,0.0004841585,0.0002774814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001756219,0.00107438,0.16316,0.001110573,0.0002323917,0.000003853846,0.5020732,0.0001518421,0.00005471439,0.08303442,0.2034514,0.04547753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008810202,0.0001850539,0.2112431,0.0001560595,0.0002654801,0.00000128991,0.1631076,0.00001126931,0.0001281633,0.002784918,0.6207634,0.0004725916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.348347,0.0006896317,0.00007853946,0.01212397,0.001818145,0.001166925,0.0000140629,0.0000866919,0.635675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918016,0.000100106,0.002471535,0.0005484762,0.001083066,0.00006272829,0.000004173689,0.00001125126,0.003917029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6434546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2923826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1479723212","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4319","title":"OVERCOMING OBSTACLES TO IMPLEMENTING THE UN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Political science; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Brenda L. Gunn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02855156058988326,"gpt":0.302471316595245,"spread":0.2739197560053617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008122093,0.00009780673,0.0001534329,0.0001052613,0.002125088,0.00008639929,0.0006678487,0.0000439553,0.0002420896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006113915,0.0000590764,0.00002607075,0.0004139893,0.00005524749,0.0002234169,0.00001182486,0.0001150944,0.00001725637],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003538169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008548778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983152,0.000234189,0.0003743996,0.0001641191,0.0004754706,0.0004365914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983324,0.0009245161,0.000203365,0.0002428269,0.0001994367,0.00009742027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002595339,0.0001060655,0.01913627,0.0001208853,0.00002947069,0.000001292059,0.9151298,0.0004190343,0.0001211038,0.06291376,0.000889111,0.001107263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004268295,0.0001724047,0.6330849,0.0004204261,0.000142471,9.893815e-7,0.1926951,0.00006240861,0.01353733,0.003340541,0.1555554,0.0005612033],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787718,0.00003947168,0.00001711343,0.001336109,0.0002705331,0.001323406,0.000008778427,0.000006342631,0.01822644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998816,0.00006546569,0.0001285194,0.000385126,0.0002136143,0.00001986395,0.000001865963,0.000008378413,0.0003611261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7224346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600492370","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4320","title":"TRANSNATIONAL JUDICIAL AND NON-JUDICIAL REMEDIES FOR CORPORATE HUMAN RIGHTS HARMS: CHALLENGES OF AND FOR LAW","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Citizenship; International human rights law; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Accountability; Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Corporate social responsibility; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Sara L. Seck","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08674591700188247,"gpt":0.2894710702355295,"spread":0.202725153233647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001937802,0.0001663013,0.000335014,0.0001834772,0.0002822136,0.0001534523,0.0002159697,0.00007460342,0.0000668143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001117412,0.0001458975,0.00005231958,0.00007285569,0.0002084441,0.0009789253,0.00008579581,0.00005198149,0.000002995846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006639649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001470579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003290334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002176687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989807,0.000004799778,0.0003483431,0.0002786078,0.000188345,0.0001992065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989128,0.0001085689,0.0003479281,0.0001177156,0.0004852418,0.00002776326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001448838,0.00006662474,0.0001926207,0.001317467,0.00004699374,6.129317e-7,0.0001650802,0.000006604414,0.002149213,0.9939865,0.001528135,0.0003952388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002661787,0.0002038455,0.04233698,0.0001840771,0.000641431,6.539731e-7,0.0001576589,0.0009106807,0.002263016,0.9363011,0.01389115,0.0004476624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886509,0.00009236194,0.000422792,0.002647029,0.000234184,0.001512492,0.00003232311,0.00003157226,0.006376307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977161,0.000003883766,0.0004991234,0.000321746,0.001180804,0.0001167008,0.00002285727,0.0000225719,0.000116262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05768546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5949529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789004301","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5020","title":"REDUCING THE “JUSTICE GAP” THROUGH ACCESS TO LEGAL INFORMATION: ESTABLISHING ACCESS TO JUSTICE ENTRY POINTS AT PUBLIC LIBRARIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public access; Context (archaeology); Political science; Intermediary; Public relations; Information access; Scope (computer science); Law; Business; Public administration; Sociology; Internet privacy; Library science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Beth Bilson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Brea Lowenberger","is_ca":true},{"name":"Graham Sharp","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1309670411987433,"gpt":0.4069469588281464,"spread":0.2759799176294031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001905882,0.00035444,0.0003771254,0.0005611494,0.002957202,0.01197747,0.004489425,0.0002251227,0.003285062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02185348,0.0003235105,0.00009008284,0.004681468,0.000452312,0.04828273,0.002149041,0.000652969,0.001086086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003792592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002321795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007972751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003106802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995663,0.0004157822,0.001004728,0.0005754108,0.001389123,0.0009519283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935787,0.002198695,0.0006817639,0.0009403422,0.00200709,0.0005934315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003857499,0.0002120381,0.001504335,0.000557522,0.0001017297,0.000004160599,0.1135736,0.0006469431,0.0001136837,0.124727,0.7535109,0.004662338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000301164,0.00009123245,0.007573616,0.0002049556,0.00063676,0.000006527639,0.02432282,0.0000624716,0.001296882,0.000473024,0.9645166,0.0005138831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07697266,0.00006034657,0.005082103,0.3407913,0.006731884,0.001902431,0.00007830185,0.0002349175,0.568146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8839276,0.00006272068,0.006283748,0.09628398,0.00628426,0.0002538491,0.0000469542,0.00006860602,0.00678833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8069549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790950295","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5043","title":"LAWYER COMPETENCIES FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE: TWO EMPIRICAL STUDIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Thompson Rivers University; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Framing (construction); Economic Justice; Sociology; Critical reflection; Legal profession; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Law and economics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Marsden","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sarah Bühler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3443472837809,"gpt":0.5682591560974322,"spread":0.2239118723165322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001048652,0.0001656529,0.0002956036,0.0002762082,0.0009029241,0.0006073872,0.00112761,0.00008444491,0.0005722276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006658883,0.0001594183,0.00006632356,0.001303545,0.0004137249,0.001737416,0.0003172419,0.0001890122,0.0002837514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001317867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008165602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001194699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003002343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980772,0.0001406474,0.0004375538,0.0003706281,0.0005297431,0.0004442132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956718,0.001436663,0.0002193852,0.0003319445,0.002087457,0.0002527492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003947814,0.0004378837,0.005234946,0.0004929628,0.0002179402,0.000002488116,0.09563466,0.0001501601,0.0007325653,0.06935603,0.8209679,0.00637769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004027296,0.0001906219,0.008534221,0.00009329505,0.0005113601,7.515015e-7,0.02297913,0.00004764667,0.001037944,0.001186991,0.964693,0.0003223037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3254444,0.0003223584,0.008867788,0.3291536,0.01081877,0.003987364,0.0001352688,0.00036341,0.3209071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437977,0.00004297706,0.01487407,0.02926806,0.004930735,0.0002636582,0.000007266906,0.00003951067,0.006776015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6183533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7971786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243187339","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4547","title":"Intelligent Governmentality","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sovereignty; Humanities; Political science; Normalization (sociology); Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Willem de Lint","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08876660572242885,"gpt":0.3778660883315745,"spread":0.2890994826091457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006152623,0.0000816869,0.0001585133,0.00004519828,0.0003370814,0.00004667976,0.0006044835,0.00008245069,0.0009392918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004768886,0.00008541255,0.00005252524,0.0003498427,0.0002111733,0.0003574411,0.0001428895,0.000112093,0.0001951509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001922282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003327201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01173348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001081829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984345,0.0001356406,0.0002413668,0.0001903775,0.0006612207,0.0003368867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991723,0.0001148628,0.00009034309,0.0001899784,0.0001024997,0.000330008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004369894,0.001825074,0.124051,0.0007899939,0.0001566352,0.0001027168,0.1499127,0.0002599634,0.0003557926,0.4111465,0.2797529,0.03120967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001819973,0.00008504684,0.06808987,0.00004275087,0.00003879154,0.00000241457,0.004358592,0.00001183543,0.0006302751,0.0006225762,0.9257292,0.0002066638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5346095,0.0001135751,0.0003544768,0.00514075,0.000576801,0.0004188134,0.00003211867,0.00006485953,0.4586891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956067,0.0002066822,0.0003029316,0.002202133,0.0003557479,0.000007238802,0.000001856509,0.000006645344,0.001310071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6459762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121435143","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4318","title":"SEX WORK, LAW, AND VIOLENCE: BEDFORD V. CANADA AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEX WORKERS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex work; Sex workers; Human rights; Political science; Law; Work (physics); Criminology; Sociology; Humanities; Engineering; Demography; Biology; Philosophy; Virology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","authors":[{"name":"Graham Hudson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Emily van der Meulen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01369665595323776,"gpt":0.2823445126062222,"spread":0.2686478566529844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003555789,0.0001092895,0.0002437524,0.00004295176,0.000439631,0.0001093431,0.0004008772,0.00009991131,0.0001745605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004971256,0.00007372734,0.00002481063,0.0002428811,0.0008039538,0.0001816062,0.0001258577,0.0001444177,0.000003767639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002562432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009164037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8458573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2103423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988613,0.0001228378,0.0002361837,0.000187398,0.0003465332,0.0002458038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991271,0.0003311725,0.000120083,0.000179059,0.00009911509,0.0001434019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000592269,0.0003664821,0.391198,0.001050041,0.001250077,0.00004532825,0.3881714,0.0007838936,0.000540276,0.09619673,0.07192459,0.04788081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009345548,0.0004571833,0.3605072,0.00542221,0.002729036,0.000008810316,0.2880514,0.0002489697,0.009220854,0.05607508,0.2648705,0.003063248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.931492,0.0005602122,0.000003048452,0.000818822,0.0001398091,0.0004108437,0.000001123294,0.00001445194,0.06655966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966549,0.00007624197,0.00007960641,0.0003276821,0.0001407448,0.00001350174,6.625692e-7,0.000008339461,0.002698311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.635515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8040669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995072367","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6068","title":"The Global Social Enterprise Lawmaking Phenomenon: State Initiatives on Purpose, Capital, and Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Legislation; Business; State (computer science); Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Legislature; Law","authors":[{"name":"Carol Liao","is_ca":true},{"name":"Elsir U. Tawfik","is_ca":false},{"name":"Pat Teichreb","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02353165647975839,"gpt":0.2707207932422603,"spread":0.247189136762502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001962587,0.0001316103,0.0001451125,0.00007767375,0.0002134988,0.0005228419,0.0002742798,0.00002978924,0.00009228637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001137276,0.0001069069,0.00003073067,0.000294669,0.00005692412,0.001095611,0.0002137996,0.0000812134,0.0001972382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003437815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002184659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001046929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007461906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991038,0.00001582972,0.0002271108,0.0002157759,0.0002502599,0.000187168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990588,0.00005533121,0.0006016786,0.0001366554,0.0001328976,0.00001458031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002869372,0.000624589,0.3290127,0.002596464,0.0002793189,0.00002531422,0.005501374,0.002502425,0.003476381,0.515079,0.008842453,0.1291906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001217466,0.00007361418,0.9457481,0.0001941762,0.0001208298,6.353393e-7,0.00194692,0.001183764,0.0001971991,0.006447085,0.04242888,0.0004413502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9219594,0.00005187363,0.0001669245,0.0008289574,0.0003211076,0.0004096933,0.00001027308,0.00004165122,0.07621009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973115,0.00001310351,0.0000307051,0.001794381,0.0004320959,0.00001430224,0.000005694896,0.00001353502,0.000384627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6167354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5041776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195285776","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4711","title":"ARCHITECTURE, RITUALS, AND NORMS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; McGill University","keywords":"Adjudication; Economic Justice; Legitimacy; Dignity; Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Realisation; Civil law (Civil law); Value (mathematics); Public law; Law and economics; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Fabien Gélinas","is_ca":true},{"name":"Karine Bates","is_ca":true},{"name":"Emily Grant","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06755592402990689,"gpt":0.3604134265595308,"spread":0.2928575025296239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003703197,0.00007084316,0.0001260128,0.00009099743,0.00008014172,0.00008416693,0.0003540135,0.00006053723,0.00002922156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003507571,0.00006452892,0.00001630941,0.000339449,0.0001143011,0.0002144849,0.000142988,0.0001149192,0.00002320082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003539645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002163009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002531258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008015531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991694,0.00003502483,0.000157173,0.0001812955,0.0002571591,0.0001999155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994532,0.00006956892,0.00005506369,0.0001357869,0.00008471949,0.0002016087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005891091,0.001544642,0.1890615,0.001614272,0.0001109715,0.00004272678,0.2913981,0.008101962,0.002368622,0.4064592,0.05400021,0.04470867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00179482,0.0001974396,0.2093245,0.000301384,0.0001595711,0.000004739581,0.01540903,0.000229547,0.0009041284,0.02131885,0.7495633,0.000792743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7550821,0.0002752786,0.0003758974,0.008567625,0.0001212127,0.0007728061,0.000017628,0.00005813704,0.2347293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977111,0.00002090622,0.0005957795,0.0004658917,0.0002082204,0.00003130564,0.000001192301,0.000008437877,0.0009571674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6955631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4472855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233108988","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4886","title":"SPLITTING TWAIL?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Temporalities; Decolonization; Argument (complex analysis); International relations; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"George Rodrigo Bandeira Galindo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08521279986176315,"gpt":0.4090848203018213,"spread":0.3238720204400581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003748275,0.00006557923,0.0001126647,0.00006025844,0.0009710616,0.0004046573,0.001223276,0.00005153563,0.0007129158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004488251,0.00006210489,0.00004734856,0.00002044439,0.0001944896,0.0005929372,0.0001726321,0.00007589321,0.0002178501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003731517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001009949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002985355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001165244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990765,0.00003017358,0.0001562633,0.0001578022,0.0003774866,0.0002017802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991594,0.00008767666,0.0001716575,0.0002864126,0.0001930351,0.000101795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001970621,0.00002466977,0.002338586,0.00002684416,0.00001472893,0.000006226164,0.002267815,0.00001092854,0.0001345394,0.9930872,0.001416551,0.0006522516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008993658,0.0001208331,0.3762258,0.0004655957,0.00029038,0.000001556742,0.0009392263,0.00008945544,0.005042493,0.09989777,0.5152777,0.0007497516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4648608,0.000006895439,0.00007367152,0.001377792,0.0005086489,0.0001318728,0.000004531201,0.00002397107,0.5330118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726372,0.00000267079,0.000467334,0.0003073956,0.001050923,0.000005372041,7.248884e-7,0.000008367143,0.02551999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8931894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7805928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087268678","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6420","title":"Access To Justice, Moral Distance And Changing Demands On Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Solidarity; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Multiculturalism; Relation (database); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Computer science; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Roger Cotterrell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06517805478586225,"gpt":0.3489909168456595,"spread":0.2838128620597973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000303688,0.0001762218,0.0002727688,0.00002416618,0.0006135599,0.0004292672,0.0009290342,0.0001378303,0.0001542989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003176476,0.0001668758,0.00006853555,0.0007686762,0.0002128298,0.0007265253,0.0003758158,0.0002020846,0.00005485666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004933338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006093076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000197562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003251905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99828,0.00007212578,0.0002279756,0.0004127261,0.0005417218,0.0004654759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998974,0.0001422937,0.0001044624,0.0001872054,0.0001371055,0.0004549393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006811821,0.0003000145,0.004340581,0.001967876,0.0001574159,0.00005632729,0.2092486,0.003564901,0.0009662862,0.6768367,0.09754026,0.004339823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001749564,0.000662917,0.01447632,0.0009939919,0.001494686,0.00000188744,0.0514664,0.000654433,0.004453206,0.002849829,0.9194195,0.001777289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.293205,0.0008340932,0.002966295,0.07898375,0.001762436,0.002332931,0.0001596914,0.0004414266,0.6193144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736443,0.00009366375,0.0005150177,0.02319178,0.001285639,0.00003197191,0.000003266611,0.00002364903,0.001210678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8218792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6804999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123338612","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4485","title":"Assessing Stakeholder Participation in Sub-Arctic Co-Management: Administrative Rulemaking and Private Agreements","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fisheries Joint Management Committee","keywords":"Rulemaking; Agency (philosophy); Negotiation; Corporate governance; Political science; Stakeholder; Public administration; Citizen journalism; Democracy; Sociology; Business; Humanities; Management; Public relations; Law; Politics; Economics; Social science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Sari Graben","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1661161331772622,"gpt":0.3919796603271741,"spread":0.225863527149912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002525926,0.000152812,0.0001750623,0.00007237522,0.0001127934,0.000119271,0.0002390226,0.00005050705,0.0006672406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002872147,0.0001551236,0.00002246552,0.0002089784,0.0001760809,0.001261559,0.0003101656,0.0001015115,0.00008477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001546621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007538486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000259017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008326564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986666,0.00007454008,0.0003093144,0.0002978199,0.0003449392,0.0003067617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.00003692047,0.0001609837,0.0001643838,0.000004958427,0.0001298913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006713559,0.00046528,0.9791455,0.0001510591,0.00004152889,0.00003498908,0.005383419,0.0001108101,0.006266045,0.0001731181,0.00005519354,0.008105894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003990125,0.00008798495,0.9921044,0.0001086976,0.00008697365,6.231979e-7,0.0008900899,0.00005386779,0.005726229,0.0002889476,0.00008140852,0.0001717497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640267,0.000009567582,0.0002898158,0.00002734658,0.00005513515,0.0004344204,0.000005144415,0.0000121196,0.03513973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978496,0.00001733011,0.001749517,0.00021782,0.00001696419,0.00003519693,0.000004677865,0.00001596784,0.00009291431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03504682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7305817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773616646","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.4999","title":"BUILDING BETTER LAW: HOW DESIGN THINKING CAN HELP US BE BETTER LAWYERS, MEET NEW CHALLENGES, AND CREATE THE FUTURE OF LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; J.W. McConnell Family Foundation","keywords":"Mindset; Variety (cybernetics); Design thinking; Relevance (law); Law; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Engineering ethics; Practice of law; Legal profession; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Susan Ursel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08205352888496954,"gpt":0.2842031446469419,"spread":0.2021496157619724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005740243,0.0002553165,0.0003727484,0.00006521319,0.000537914,0.0008696064,0.003197631,0.0001372605,0.00002147811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009349261,0.0001725108,0.00008005618,0.00006806991,0.0003636456,0.001337468,0.001195032,0.0002263392,0.000003266226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002656681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007345039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001342629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005146675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982038,0.0001388322,0.0002640475,0.0005084363,0.0004847308,0.0004002051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979073,0.0002508434,0.0002808916,0.001233003,0.0001556305,0.0001723758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002879986,0.0001818164,0.0003400152,0.001025289,0.0005402975,0.00008028418,0.03698802,0.0003021678,0.01476866,0.7792351,0.06345858,0.1027917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004195933,0.002112665,0.01198834,0.002316041,0.001456404,0.0001179229,0.001193189,0.01101251,0.239831,0.08950786,0.6330979,0.003170187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.109561,0.01615303,0.170998,0.5521435,0.004694949,0.003593773,0.00005853226,0.0004652638,0.142332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9474621,0.0004794875,0.03561903,0.01455354,0.001374669,0.0000102053,7.802909e-7,0.00004444423,0.0004556741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8379012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8385635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611587239","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4887","title":"LEGAL SCHOLACTIVISTS IN THE THIRD WORLD: BETWEEN AMBITION, ALTRUISM AND ACCESS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subaltern; Situated; Third world; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Law; History; Economic history","authors":[{"name":"Cynthia Farid","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07499485072966822,"gpt":0.4058455047294704,"spread":0.3308506539998022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008530306,0.0001157983,0.0002229429,0.0001217782,0.001285085,0.001588602,0.001573023,0.00005858488,0.00003720296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006181499,0.0000898105,0.00003878611,0.0002371231,0.0004405369,0.001671255,0.0004651692,0.0002333833,0.00001584035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004131667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008802828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05025611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02426097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987131,0.0001347925,0.000206502,0.000208268,0.0004089768,0.0003282975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989573,0.0003191702,0.000183855,0.0003475866,0.0000934412,0.0000985869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001284979,0.0001569325,0.777828,0.0002599136,0.0001038769,0.00002684998,0.05799988,0.00002135461,0.00006499523,0.1000695,0.05089683,0.01244336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001911008,0.00002032752,0.7905083,0.00005996334,0.00005993809,2.461657e-7,0.001244651,0.000001145382,0.0000722397,0.0007609426,0.2069646,0.0001165999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6537572,0.0001071965,0.00001297821,0.02340809,0.0002513797,0.000384722,0.00001464104,0.00001908652,0.3220448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995874,0.00008406075,0.00003627975,0.001353218,0.0009198427,0.00002242544,8.101483e-7,0.00000869582,0.001700612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3421169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789070291","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5021","title":"OUT OF THE CLOSET AND UP THE LADDER? DIVERSITY IN ONTARIO’S BIG LAW FIRMS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Closet; Lesbian; Negotiation; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Legal profession; Public relations; Gender studies; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Asher Alkoby","is_ca":true},{"name":"Pnina Alon-Shenker","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1411676094563412,"gpt":0.3840802655985737,"spread":0.2429126561422325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005794817,0.00004944585,0.00008069102,0.00004177142,0.0004216535,0.00008401927,0.0005276697,0.00004754281,0.0003299713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004954424,0.00003367661,0.00002094546,0.000319746,0.0004756912,0.0003724084,0.0003207356,0.0001934889,0.00001663611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005166755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3553134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7623826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992623,0.0001116796,0.0001482701,0.0001048704,0.0002537452,0.0001191399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991885,0.0002605732,0.0001268171,0.0001943246,0.0001919725,0.00003781587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001271938,0.0002106916,0.2238734,0.0000538124,0.00005140921,6.729228e-7,0.5419083,0.00001046937,0.0002299295,0.2036043,0.0272022,0.002727633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000224098,0.00003473948,0.4941944,0.00004056344,0.0000887092,2.165588e-7,0.01173256,0.00000363571,0.0003939248,0.001875103,0.4913187,0.00009336819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7677158,0.00001283417,0.00001101102,0.02592359,0.001493619,0.0002971313,0.000008816085,0.000008017321,0.2045292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937551,0.000004125088,0.00005198177,0.002273546,0.000187109,0.000003532274,4.96723e-7,0.000002936268,0.003721172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5301757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6489797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123586893","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4566","title":"India Sinking: Threats to the Right to Food, Food Security & Development, in an Era of Economic Growth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Foundation for Research, Science and Technology","keywords":"Food security; Right to food; Poverty; Development economics; Economic growth; State (computer science); Agriculture; Political science; Economics; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Sukanya Pillay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05217552426609419,"gpt":0.3305887104590601,"spread":0.2784131861929659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008104316,0.0001782973,0.0003127408,0.0002435238,0.000279392,0.0001655125,0.001148997,0.0001001304,0.0002521454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009027319,0.0001388702,0.00004315354,0.0004119469,0.00006754953,0.0004072996,0.0001692129,0.000170402,0.0001604168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000217348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005601385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002954963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01739156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981704,0.0001106841,0.0004925777,0.000378427,0.0004113269,0.0004366211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990131,0.0001061663,0.0001438208,0.0003087152,0.0001356254,0.0002925697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006187321,0.001150002,0.04141238,0.0002297245,0.000187241,0.00001545719,0.6602412,0.001200174,0.0002916965,0.2610682,0.01320206,0.02038313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001364843,0.001560145,0.722108,0.0005994578,0.000133205,0.000001719827,0.003294554,0.00001072224,0.01217644,0.05889799,0.1983487,0.001504266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660667,0.00003391626,0.0001194773,0.002287736,0.0002209604,0.000808587,0.0000131855,0.00002926675,0.03042021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995773,0.000007724487,0.002301682,0.001405692,0.0002206034,0.00002623834,0.000004301516,0.00001241837,0.0002483134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6806956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9704897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284889561","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7389","title":"Integrating Social Work Within Legal Clinics: An Inter-Professional Perspective to Address Social-Legal Needs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Trillium Foundation","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Social work; Public relations; Legal profession; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Alicia Lam","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vanessa Emery","is_ca":false},{"name":"Renee Griffin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Saini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08879246285694156,"gpt":0.4565957267388454,"spread":0.3678032638819038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002107939,0.0001838545,0.0002882616,0.0004839044,0.003033435,0.0007376301,0.001219809,0.0001244996,0.002808212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002387549,0.0002041602,0.0001046341,0.003073731,0.0002047948,0.002068175,0.0005205687,0.00121938,0.00006558031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005601877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00222295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005573244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001196689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996832,0.0008309531,0.0005860972,0.0003881307,0.0009523771,0.000410488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977465,0.0004777495,0.0004454872,0.000201929,0.0009045153,0.0002237969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004418761,0.0004929985,0.001037942,0.00002046171,0.00005275997,0.000005073862,0.3911822,0.000176915,0.0001453755,0.5629338,0.04084388,0.002666716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003109477,0.0001701115,0.00603098,0.00003789748,0.0001257289,0.000001336867,0.6114184,0.0000307938,0.00004536578,0.0008652301,0.3806029,0.0003602807],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4891505,0.00002766416,0.0006387306,0.1815967,0.008058678,0.00141083,0.0001436312,0.0002363988,0.3187368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764437,6.051493e-7,0.001396972,0.008082029,0.002329951,0.0001779171,0.00001805376,0.000034454,0.01151631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5620686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771611331","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5012","title":"ENHANCING THE LEGAL PROFESSION’S CAPACITY FOR INNOVATION: THE PROMISE OF REFLECTIVE PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH FOR INCREASING ACCESS TO JUSTICE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Enabling; Economic Justice; Sociology; Public relations; Action (physics); Action research; Legal profession; Reflective practice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Michele Leering","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3892990921970736,"gpt":0.5793227361091744,"spread":0.1900236439121007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110303,0.0001186663,0.0001897025,0.0002618115,0.0043957,0.001471054,0.001258004,0.0001156479,0.00002435169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09919323,0.00008664851,0.00003439627,0.001093145,0.0004198726,0.004469878,0.0003285249,0.0004967735,0.000003320246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001671198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001604457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009516326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00347884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975153,0.0006918592,0.0004857184,0.0003180594,0.0006427413,0.0003462815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856461,0.007853247,0.0008243237,0.0005391753,0.00504821,0.0000889773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007868199,0.0009147972,0.001301305,0.002726676,0.000331345,0.000001233441,0.1919925,0.0001391482,0.06816985,0.6192103,0.06717081,0.04017379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001174553,0.000437819,0.03316094,0.0006458924,0.001035331,0.000005630073,0.1272825,0.0001405516,0.04929369,0.00564379,0.7807324,0.0004468713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5501914,0.00003399226,0.008320116,0.3889066,0.001956481,0.007328261,0.00004883996,0.00003709736,0.04317724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859534,0.00001752189,0.008390393,0.00227399,0.001235055,0.0007440899,0.000003205719,0.00002085588,0.001361499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7135616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586153411","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v29i0.4487","title":"Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’Im, Islam and Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari’a","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Politics; Orientalism; Religious studies; State (computer science); Christianity; Subject (documents); Secular state; Negotiation; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Abdel Salam Sidahmed","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03776179481296774,"gpt":0.2991788014757872,"spread":0.2614170066628194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000544649,0.0001155589,0.0002234578,0.00006891963,0.0004322242,0.00004803644,0.0005810757,0.00007703328,0.0001926912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001228488,0.00009269975,0.00004469776,0.0002127116,0.0003988008,0.0002851004,0.0001909146,0.000135442,0.000007034505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003439718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001069539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004728022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001646348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987937,0.0001126512,0.0002539563,0.0002190369,0.0003490222,0.0002716972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991728,0.0001026525,0.0001982071,0.000253308,0.0001975984,0.00007542438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002079422,0.0002480167,0.00837831,0.0004708297,0.0002144669,0.00001682165,0.8802159,0.0001507572,0.001058336,0.08062611,0.008840135,0.0195723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00162742,0.0007411146,0.4562811,0.000320796,0.001202203,0.000003754879,0.4221228,0.0006095952,0.001448822,0.003958565,0.1104533,0.001230525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9228641,0.001394623,0.0001212858,0.0005682451,0.001001475,0.0005152252,0.00002494493,0.00003843026,0.07347162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997636,0.0002699064,0.0005091149,0.0003413349,0.0004846572,0.00001253249,9.701462e-7,0.00001669746,0.0007288497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4580932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7147387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281733716","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7280","title":"Sex Workers and the Best Interests of their Children: Issues Faced by Sex Workers Involved in Custody and Access Legal Proceedings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Child custody; Sex work; Best interests; Female sex; Stigma (botany); Judicial opinion; Family law; Same sex; Psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Family medicine; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Julie E. DeWolf","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0227481550487409,"gpt":0.3170275474289727,"spread":0.2942793923802318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001016196,0.0002002661,0.0004221557,0.0002071133,0.0004097124,0.0003155594,0.001036289,0.0001205934,0.00009415321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001839223,0.0001535441,0.00005098804,0.0008088033,0.0007567081,0.000560733,0.00077523,0.0004290413,0.000001616137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005400063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000929515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008944813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003167255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982257,0.0001897117,0.0003922729,0.0003781674,0.0004605262,0.0003535638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991202,0.0002752135,0.0002397193,0.0001568802,0.00008122207,0.0001267258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008836397,0.0002837401,0.788709,0.0001759159,0.0002616011,0.000005754217,0.1904946,0.0005834082,0.0002347566,0.0006689621,0.01175873,0.005939906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004010692,0.0004167994,0.1077087,0.0007869608,0.0005480779,0.000006315929,0.8610485,0.0004258329,0.003554783,0.0008713723,0.01970392,0.0009181066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853268,0.002309808,0.000003234321,0.003163073,0.0001514626,0.0008613502,0.000009972465,0.00003383798,0.008140471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968656,0.0004057766,0.00003987045,0.0002276504,0.0001119023,0.00005249895,0.000003891051,0.00002384135,0.002268939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6810002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}