{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":9,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"dac5892efbde","filters":{"venue":"World Political Science"}},"results":[{"id":"W1989824334","doi":"10.1515/wpsr-2012-0006","title":"Neo-liberalism, Semi-clientelism and the Politics of Scale in Mexican Anti-poverty Policies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"United Nations Development Programme","keywords":"Clientelism; Politics; Poverty; State (computer science); Political science; Democratization; Democracy; Political economy; Public administration; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01558318669572694,"gpt":0.3259507560896213,"spread":0.3103675693938943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002584661,0.0001358324,0.0003054452,0.0001382631,0.0007816399,0.0001043147,0.000581177,0.00005782859,0.00008363053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008874583,0.00009576962,0.00008916905,0.001345846,0.01468855,0.0003582198,0.0002381825,0.0002301031,0.000008396703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000250275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000367222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03510012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000666739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963271,0.0002467268,0.0003575636,0.000222712,0.0007977088,0.002048172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979131,0.0007627855,0.00008945868,0.0002810516,0.0001029412,0.0008507079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001733521,0.00004949707,0.05771663,0.000004971547,0.000002268692,1.47491e-7,0.01272707,8.754315e-7,0.00004481652,0.9290814,0.0002697062,0.0001009172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001299026,0.00004236485,0.6718878,0.0001043226,0.00005193691,0.000008515788,0.02701619,0.0005543283,0.001395079,0.2073883,0.08960235,0.0006497712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6873299,0.0002194331,0.00002041092,0.02616806,0.0003439415,0.0002179133,0.00002560727,0.00003109085,0.2856436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910055,0.00004487675,0.0003507454,0.006180108,0.0003443158,0.000007801573,5.997289e-7,0.000007599662,0.002058476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.721693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770995900","doi":"10.1515/wps-2017-0010","title":"Justice, Gender, and Corporations. Outline of a Feminist Political Philosophy of the Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Egalitarianism; Business ethics; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1715530473908987,"gpt":0.4054673897364112,"spread":0.2339143423455124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001639066,0.000110985,0.0002124859,0.00009763628,0.002232405,0.0001524766,0.0009518913,0.00008775377,0.00002857689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005899932,0.00008412192,0.00007196769,0.0003916585,0.02249003,0.0003792225,0.0002957819,0.0002552666,0.000006551405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001168606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001037621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001922405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003662282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974179,0.0001362692,0.0003813968,0.0002790831,0.0009335824,0.0008517388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976446,0.0004786667,0.0002505816,0.0005761809,0.0003422422,0.0007077096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006787616,0.00006783741,0.008232217,0.00003854954,0.000002780578,7.525368e-7,0.0003934057,3.356892e-7,0.0001984363,0.9909835,0.00003558986,0.00003982514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001474943,0.00003049615,0.05574522,0.00004096983,0.00004777165,0.000001577851,0.0004453702,0.0001038529,0.001085459,0.941361,0.0008858161,0.0001049377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04341512,0.00002162676,0.0001224614,0.04208243,0.0006237492,0.0002579614,0.00007601832,0.00002346138,0.9133772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997568,0.000002122832,0.0003546329,0.001291901,0.000412656,0.000004061846,7.456189e-7,0.000005225358,0.0003606889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073034202","doi":"10.1515/wpsr-2012-0014","title":"Towards a Representative Bureaucracy: Promoting Linguistic Representation and Diversity in the Swiss and Canadian Federal Public Services","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Linguistic diversity; Bureaucracy; Rationalization (economics); Multilingualism; Public service; Politics; Representation (politics); Diversity (politics); Political science; Linguistics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04205599565328958,"gpt":0.3407879908283974,"spread":0.2987319951751078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001384767,0.00008541362,0.0001174565,0.000112815,0.001749615,0.0007729923,0.0004162413,0.0000340352,0.00003997387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00182228,0.00006319984,0.00001704273,0.000820485,0.001519022,0.0006179099,0.0002405377,0.0001503842,0.00001092919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003007214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003943802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9782197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8291891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975698,0.0002242903,0.0001606501,0.0003561973,0.0005804948,0.001108588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984738,0.0002952477,0.00004554072,0.0001413543,0.0001402324,0.0009038538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[4.633386e-7,0.000009014496,0.2031472,0.000007785407,0.000001066355,0.000006846059,0.01425914,4.489351e-8,0.00000694343,0.782054,0.00004073901,0.0004666841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008860075,0.00001112229,0.882619,0.0000284578,0.000002946411,0.000004041371,0.005368626,0.000311648,0.00001016754,0.1095454,0.001910936,0.00009907281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8393851,0.00004197815,0.000004709615,0.04994629,0.0001104104,0.0003855787,0.000006456533,0.00001698411,0.1101025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977821,0.000003120853,0.00007577087,0.001581213,0.0001585703,0.00001842799,6.15717e-7,0.00000248572,0.0003776842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6794718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323854666","doi":"10.1515/wps-2015-0005","title":"Social Movements and Political Opportunities: Lesbians, Gays and the Inclusion of Sexual Orientation in the Québec Charter of Human Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Lesbian; Charter; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Human rights; Jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Political science; Homosexuality; Gay rights; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05861772373071554,"gpt":0.3319666576865493,"spread":0.2733489339558338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003438084,0.00004886273,0.0001223724,0.0002139054,0.001609498,0.0001028682,0.0002841777,0.00002643098,0.00004428349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001834536,0.00003470652,0.0000154292,0.0003305153,0.01053118,0.0001999952,0.0001438028,0.00008744295,0.000001094922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004209883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000888873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8479896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9165952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982057,0.000343048,0.0002195521,0.0001420092,0.0006948584,0.0003948208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993218,0.0001721813,0.00005673878,0.00009692346,0.00008888737,0.0002635087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004316671,0.00002300068,0.001075201,0.000005453232,9.126383e-7,0.000001145008,0.04614472,1.561137e-8,0.00002889153,0.9521134,0.0003426798,0.000260247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002478251,0.0002298885,0.1474418,0.00005359374,0.0000548803,0.000003851679,0.1498488,0.0000715414,0.00009465429,0.5483117,0.1510695,0.0003415333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8890172,0.00003004931,0.00000439043,0.01724329,0.00006567935,0.0001538621,0.00001198162,0.000003916245,0.09346969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973601,6.943743e-7,0.000005025467,0.0006810742,0.00009086538,0.000004146777,8.761884e-7,0.000001532403,0.001855666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4038017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000979703","doi":"10.2202/1935-6226.1066","title":"The Dialectics of Multicultural Identity: Learning from Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Newspaper; Nationalism; Globe; Dialectic; Identity (music); National identity; Sociology; Gender studies; Media studies; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Law; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01212574662765288,"gpt":0.2646220509466194,"spread":0.2524963043189666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005246538,0.00004273741,0.00007550905,0.00008849623,0.002811179,0.0004445071,0.0004988558,0.00001664584,0.0001178243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001671611,0.0000381736,0.00003064057,0.000830587,0.002566389,0.0002884861,0.00002860576,0.0001501107,0.00001139085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001678562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003482883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982843,0.00007138212,0.0001343195,0.0001360773,0.0007368113,0.0006371301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999016,0.0002859084,0.00004327968,0.000106555,0.0001190236,0.0004291825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001505587,0.000007648388,0.0009854715,5.481042e-7,0.000001470155,0.000003254488,0.001607621,0.000004927507,0.0002405276,0.9931871,0.001714916,0.002244978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008999687,0.0000171497,0.1829771,0.00001481444,0.00001412662,4.15471e-7,0.004440998,0.00007286231,0.000185163,0.01751875,0.7945087,0.0001599504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6987471,0.0003030943,0.00002158247,0.0321398,0.001591289,0.0001588078,0.00001295241,0.00004514411,0.2669802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912475,0.00001098925,0.00003847346,0.0004732976,0.0001813523,6.749672e-7,3.998683e-7,0.000001300781,0.008045982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9756684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317390700","doi":"10.2202/1935-6226.1086","title":"History of the Word \"Democracy\" in Canada and Québec: A Political Analysis of Rhetorical Strategies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Elite; Rhetorical question; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01134764209404622,"gpt":0.2494837978069143,"spread":0.2381361557128681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005866343,0.00005973165,0.0002121024,0.0006155958,0.0002578212,0.00004832771,0.000489571,0.00003354521,0.0004768727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006192484,0.00005561196,0.00006403087,0.00200946,0.007526064,0.0001745216,0.00007170365,0.0002451749,9.962743e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00683061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04667842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981267,0.00007692133,0.0002523233,0.0001979482,0.0006463756,0.0006996981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987513,0.0003098243,0.00005952485,0.0002199274,0.00009039539,0.0005689837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001654842,0.00001569665,0.0584925,0.000004369952,0.000005753117,0.000001647916,0.001069367,0.000001155873,0.0001658328,0.9395419,0.0005026606,0.0001974389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006482636,0.000004831907,0.8968513,0.000009286256,0.0000742582,5.930735e-7,0.002605827,0.0001082178,0.00002010421,0.007440779,0.09270346,0.0001164973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8850785,0.00006663341,0.000001729768,0.006756794,0.0005896167,0.00006421515,0.00001465193,0.000005038585,0.1074228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996205,0.000001536423,0.00002706842,0.0002922586,0.00004014083,0.000001654695,1.340776e-7,0.000002117886,0.003430035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9321011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345542358","doi":"10.1515/wps-2016-0001","title":"The Controversy over Religious Arbitration Tribunals in Ontario: Unspoken Identity-Based Justifications?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Opposition (politics); Islam; Faith; Sociology; Identity (music); Law; Political science; Religious identity; Compulsory arbitration; Epistemology; Negotiation; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02448530334463882,"gpt":0.3369978418985137,"spread":0.3125125385538748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00260337,0.00008947517,0.0001035313,0.0001916681,0.00101592,0.0003672783,0.0005836756,0.00004567616,0.0001012971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002057853,0.00005505262,0.00005604566,0.0009899035,0.002328384,0.0007183669,0.00003157087,0.0001120944,0.0001008851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001617117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001878826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3794555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9075944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99742,0.0001473363,0.0002953065,0.0003070819,0.0009303696,0.0008999315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981813,0.0009542311,0.00007751307,0.0002704892,0.0001913763,0.0003250759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001231587,0.00003066085,0.01369915,8.01572e-7,7.888794e-7,0.000001171496,0.0003455458,0.00000250335,0.0007531932,0.9834525,0.001348862,0.0003525202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008310815,0.00003336099,0.2753533,0.00005359152,0.000016615,4.095253e-7,0.0005458783,0.00009060711,0.0009776673,0.6706144,0.05125609,0.0002270019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2530781,0.000112448,0.005288069,0.07737661,0.001435267,0.0009198953,0.00001316565,0.0001448739,0.6616315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950786,0.00001603153,0.0001029042,0.001128462,0.00009249006,0.00003141367,0.000001175596,0.000003864151,0.003545027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7420005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8579029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962455424","doi":"10.1515/wps-2019-0003","title":"“The Foundations of Freedom and Civilization”: The Durham Report, Municipal Institutions and Liberalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Political radicalism; Legislature; Law; Political science; Civilization; Parliament; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political economy; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03400152398804058,"gpt":0.3614343968340776,"spread":0.327432872846037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002005495,0.00006236539,0.00008562116,0.0000522595,0.00213339,0.0002047929,0.0004066333,0.00002597019,0.00008087719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027442,0.00003800658,0.00002364951,0.0007177623,0.0135452,0.0004279901,0.0001680229,0.000121242,0.00001414902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006123054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004586261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002808067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002449759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984729,0.0001364423,0.0002234255,0.0001985696,0.0003807655,0.0005878817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981269,0.001070811,0.00005350079,0.0003033957,0.0001253013,0.0003201196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001337157,0.000008880151,0.003233807,0.000002149995,0.000001632679,6.953846e-7,0.00080232,0.000005351381,0.00004283213,0.9957612,0.00002458409,0.0001151761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001407998,0.00002810568,0.07855888,0.00004312339,0.00001735498,0.00002207993,0.00204742,0.0006209826,0.00008328791,0.65536,0.2629229,0.0001550887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5236192,0.00009126317,0.00008363468,0.01856094,0.0004288073,0.000259536,0.000008013584,0.00002818585,0.4569204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931502,0.00001985079,0.0001200627,0.00055698,0.00008603402,0.000007776649,4.863791e-7,0.00000207005,0.00605656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.469531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084049396","doi":"10.2202/1935-6226.1052","title":"Freedom of Expression and Shock Radio: Quebec CHOI-FM as a Case Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Argument (complex analysis); Expression (computer science); Freedom of expression; Democracy; Symbol (formal); Populism; Political science; Freedom of the press; Sociology; Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Human rights; Linguistics; Computer science; Physics; Politics; Quantum mechanics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03228200257731553,"gpt":0.3424691464623549,"spread":0.3101871438850394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009590298,0.0001030645,0.0001797598,0.0002097908,0.001114791,0.00007552841,0.0003254186,0.0000420591,0.000231958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001020614,0.00008322509,0.00003742613,0.000740376,0.003624452,0.0006680531,0.0001489642,0.0001214892,0.00002474207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001375655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004741543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1684088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03639324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976674,0.0001778439,0.0002623729,0.0003422298,0.0009131249,0.0006370289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985401,0.0002613286,0.00007051601,0.0002561653,0.0001304368,0.0007414534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002185667,0.0004758901,0.02926777,0.000008746111,0.000003288837,0.0005117966,0.02569986,0.000004911866,0.004774226,0.9360428,0.002022496,0.001166396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01076578,0.002634088,0.4401295,0.0007778931,0.0001678607,0.003035234,0.3394402,0.003618227,0.03429238,0.1020866,0.05960878,0.003443477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607604,0.00005020935,0.00003540039,0.001100721,0.0002545475,0.0002932206,0.00000253446,0.00004947622,0.03745351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952404,0.000003114691,0.0005093465,0.0001921436,0.0001786245,0.000007314453,2.512347e-7,0.000004441144,0.003864366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8339562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}