{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":9,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"2ac60cb6ae0c","filters":{"venue":"World Tax Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W1865361933","doi":"10.59403/16sxx9x","title":"What Can Trade Teach Tax? Examining Reform Options for Art. 24 (Non-Discrimination) of the OECD Model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; International economics; Tax reform; Double taxation; Public economics; Direct tax; Ad valorem tax; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03602288621857019,"gpt":0.2628615610539826,"spread":0.2268386748354124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004838164,0.0001262846,0.0001481629,0.0002655798,0.0004878528,0.0005965115,0.0003094453,0.00004850419,0.0002851576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007726349,0.00008682861,0.0001209573,0.0002001991,0.00006114283,0.001712509,0.00005455572,0.0004987495,0.00001970711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004033016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004964049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009589164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004521253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990498,0.000008300031,0.0003354664,0.0001263302,0.0002677425,0.0002123448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990991,0.00002428564,0.0005436375,0.0001888965,0.0001210584,0.00002296174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001328218,0.0006623748,0.008097864,0.0004315459,0.0002011651,0.000007582266,0.005789286,0.00581783,0.04988348,0.5481347,0.3125274,0.06831392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001703139,0.00002277779,0.03981533,0.0003719671,0.0002313139,0.00003392292,0.00632607,0.07753997,0.001552377,0.01362105,0.8582628,0.0005192715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7098716,0.0002763388,0.01216661,0.07956709,0.01197297,0.001295949,0.00003567922,0.000147567,0.1846661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682426,0.00001135304,0.002697613,0.0009945475,0.001393736,0.00001829473,0.00001197864,0.00002171654,0.02660812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5457354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5752174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166775709","doi":"10.59403/2sjxe4d","title":"Taxing Artificial Intelligence and Robots: Critical Assessment of Potential Policy Solutions and Recommendation for Alternative Approaches","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Government (linguistics); Revenue; Tax revenue; Neutrality; Order (exchange); Unemployment; Simplicity; Economics; Business; Artificial intelligence; Public economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Finance; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1780333115588501,"gpt":0.3722107261119733,"spread":0.1941774145531232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005364635,0.00005225487,0.00009695926,0.00008779841,0.0005019939,0.0002087471,0.00005804956,0.00002516161,0.00003968265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002088816,0.00005299338,0.00003674895,0.0001405367,0.0001912886,0.0006759756,0.00001778483,0.0001294881,4.745812e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004526382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004442523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000171067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993384,0.00007058778,0.0002534074,0.00008806069,0.00009385228,0.0001557044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995611,0.0001289997,0.0001014144,0.00001711265,0.00006348335,0.0001278532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002231277,0.00003781503,0.0001375554,0.00001790748,0.00002033957,3.687393e-7,0.003773194,0.00072647,0.00002332997,0.6879166,0.00009834381,0.3072258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006683134,0.000605549,0.002770582,0.0002133358,0.0001489605,0.00003885831,0.04145193,0.2460301,0.0008021004,0.6823454,0.02431342,0.0006114072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002717071,0.00003462435,0.9131014,0.07387461,0.0001396043,0.0001649966,0.00002468345,0.000008785776,0.009934193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877929,0.00007317991,0.01145775,0.0001477518,0.0004964024,0.000005926343,0.000004175868,0.000003135753,0.00001878278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3860982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278006938","doi":"10.59403/3m3s88x","title":"Beneficial Ownership: Current Trends","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expert opinion; Liability; Treaty; Public economics; Business; Object (grammar); Tax treaty; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Law; Tax law; Double taxation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02173090157740133,"gpt":0.2646252626379187,"spread":0.2428943610605174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003019391,0.0001258503,0.0001239622,0.0006132497,0.0003005663,0.0007170861,0.0002295744,0.00003541381,0.007684879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007870697,0.00009793337,0.0001102984,0.0005391759,0.00003221235,0.0008080554,0.00004861819,0.0008109878,0.0006757477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000119868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000147954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001091391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002445519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991003,0.000006372453,0.0002365129,0.0001252911,0.0002840408,0.0002474865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994102,0.00001229802,0.0003097502,0.0001188612,0.0001189699,0.00002998596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004320276,0.0001659441,0.0320357,0.00002412893,0.00002191522,0.00002525965,0.0001022186,0.00002167342,0.001449248,0.1671102,0.1860427,0.6129578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002974214,0.000002498861,0.02831845,0.00001658159,0.00002126018,0.00001099991,0.00003085893,0.0001722025,0.00003236367,0.001441355,0.9695125,0.0001434696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3968112,0.0005554559,0.000370506,0.01423999,0.01841862,0.0001074598,0.000004163035,0.0002808538,0.5692118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767413,0.000004537148,0.0002256854,0.0007196614,0.01337097,0.000002028563,0.00000717991,0.00001667799,0.008911982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7834699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235267256","doi":"10.59403/3dmw2h2","title":"The Arm’s Length Comparable in Transfer Pricing: A Search for an “Actual” or a “Hypothetical” Transaction?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Database transaction; Transfer pricing; Jurisprudence; Business; Transaction cost; Law and economics; Law; Computer security; Economics; Operations research; Actuarial science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Political science; Database; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1202862291411199,"gpt":0.2992740604997551,"spread":0.1789878313586352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001437182,0.0001321274,0.0001727406,0.0002629127,0.0004161524,0.0006417544,0.0002545418,0.00003063784,0.0002274304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005837917,0.00008346424,0.00007051361,0.0006096945,0.0000585668,0.0008328143,0.000009632671,0.0003960836,0.00005693133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006381195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008838174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004410675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987805,0.00003931857,0.0003455571,0.0001604744,0.0003197716,0.0003544005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999361,0.0001129936,0.00009860237,0.0001355865,0.0002371427,0.00005464104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0197841,0.005503763,0.03452101,0.0005823616,0.0003590004,0.0002244273,0.009095777,0.03511386,0.005294031,0.2537679,0.1652887,0.470465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005073962,0.0001416681,0.003838856,0.0001145784,0.00004942446,0.00006364642,0.003339025,0.04383684,0.0003439224,0.008208218,0.9345871,0.0004027244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7987883,0.0003359868,0.12506,0.03287077,0.001754408,0.001659038,0.000007846555,0.000179466,0.03934421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930581,0.00001511547,0.0004236615,0.0008903819,0.0007478354,0.00002363966,0.000002354295,0.00002306446,0.004815795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7692984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6188452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912358985","doi":"10.59403/her9d7","title":"Confronting Conflicts of Qualification in Tax Treaty Law: The Principle of Common Interpretation and the New Approach Revisited","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Convention; Treaty; Foundation (evidence); Common law; Tax treaty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; Tax law; Double taxation; International law; Economics; Computer science; Public international law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02551537576445152,"gpt":0.282776321441455,"spread":0.2572609456770035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225528,0.00007262987,0.0001802949,0.0001339677,0.0001417925,0.0001596318,0.0001595288,0.0000226079,0.00008732607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001855753,0.00004138801,0.00004046914,0.0002984422,0.0002062344,0.0003653699,0.00004248824,0.000163101,0.00000623759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001054677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009964945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001854487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001317921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991802,0.00008022432,0.0004097708,0.00008254888,0.0001604999,0.00008674731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987392,0.00008478714,0.0008796405,0.0001338103,0.0001541259,0.000008373048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004609864,0.00007867602,0.02524432,0.000107748,0.00005040692,5.560122e-7,0.005656273,0.00006500087,0.0008847719,0.9537365,0.002990034,0.01072474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004852079,0.00002697595,0.115484,0.0005772008,0.0001690623,0.00001552668,0.002596809,0.05072055,0.0009451188,0.007399672,0.8169585,0.0002545628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7548888,0.001438543,0.01130121,0.007651873,0.0003354821,0.0009517716,0.000003876598,0.00003555448,0.2233929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974045,0.00001109591,0.0003221603,0.0004542236,0.0003948114,0.000002511385,0.000005145222,0.000006245139,0.001399305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9463368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2803442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535831459","doi":"10.59403/1ct26s2","title":"Fiscal Federalism in Chinese Taxation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fiscal federalism; Economics; Public economics; State (computer science); Control (management); China; Local government; Tax reform; Federalism; Directive; Power (physics); Economic policy; Decentralization; Market economy; Public administration; Political science; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02963238681992226,"gpt":0.2872886629793158,"spread":0.2576562761593936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004464828,0.0000551525,0.00007488141,0.00008081023,0.000284871,0.00007950327,0.0001146313,0.00003928984,0.001189205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001612582,0.00004582528,0.00003801977,0.000367997,0.00004576188,0.0003844213,0.00001145206,0.0001644306,0.00004244455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001454546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000535408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001196523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01905851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990983,0.0001021014,0.0001785957,0.00007598777,0.0003340728,0.0002109357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996369,0.00001584673,0.0001929105,0.00004537268,0.00002857258,0.00008034218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003731774,0.0001033069,0.9265298,0.000001765051,0.000004713514,0.00003708942,0.01550845,0.00001705678,0.00003999368,0.03992762,0.01013048,0.007662426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004362474,0.00001730254,0.9206159,0.00002761657,0.000003427869,0.000006227759,0.0006447162,0.00005759317,0.00004041899,0.02197101,0.05606756,0.000111998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7272022,0.0001431025,0.004058469,0.003411686,0.001129613,0.0001510896,0.000001929443,0.00003098224,0.263871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927385,0.0001373985,0.0005329044,0.0003187358,0.0003388136,0.000002091257,9.204519e-7,0.000004327044,0.005926277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2655364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389987986","doi":"10.59403/2yk92b6","title":"The Effects of Value Added Tax (VAT) on the Rate of Government Growth: An OECD Panel Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Value-added tax; Government revenue; Panel data; Government (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Revenue; Tax revenue; Monetary economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Ordinary least squares; Government spending; International economics; Public economics; Econometrics; Finance; Market economy; Welfare; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03776555353347366,"gpt":0.2230360098541741,"spread":0.1852704563207005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002707765,0.0001673071,0.0003804202,0.00009152807,0.0003044638,0.00006394128,0.0004930237,0.00004307412,0.0001263059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003638504,0.0001101232,0.000170281,0.000125714,0.0001021761,0.0002373231,0.0000759438,0.0004034766,0.0001205324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001330857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001271389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001313436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006292738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984062,0.0001650397,0.0007883743,0.0001594698,0.00008049423,0.0004004546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977649,0.0007214598,0.0009732853,0.0003875789,0.00001702079,0.0001357427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002478087,0.001451466,0.3396953,0.00005857927,0.0005215815,0.000004498145,0.003017857,0.00004967321,0.0003659766,0.6347927,0.01822047,0.001574091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001801945,0.0009696861,0.898608,0.00005394172,0.00004972489,0.00001458665,0.0008914382,0.0002778444,0.004865448,0.08209227,0.01004159,0.0003335839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775249,0.0005359055,0.00003606402,0.001412126,0.001028856,0.0003194927,0.0000680058,0.000004779688,0.0190699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976835,0.00005919185,0.00003179304,0.0004250575,0.0004949003,0.0000170962,4.900518e-7,0.00002129526,0.001266651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5589126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4490693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953813743","doi":"10.59403/ezx63v","title":"Designing a General Anti-Avoidance Rule for the East African Community – A Comparative Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Base erosion and profit shifting; Tax avoidance; Political science; Context (archaeology); Directive; International taxation; International community; Double taxation; Public administration; Law; International trade; Politics; Economics; Tax reform; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04922584887536999,"gpt":0.2804660583099513,"spread":0.2312402094345813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009228108,0.0001322467,0.0002766729,0.0003617033,0.0009648234,0.0007398197,0.0003769158,0.00002062165,0.0004891264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005322057,0.00009006599,0.0002169253,0.001095073,0.00004873851,0.0006033267,0.00006979322,0.0004822195,0.0001259271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001823444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001013927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001715573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999127,0.00007881899,0.000242579,0.0001039151,0.0002112092,0.000236434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988993,0.0001601363,0.0004940365,0.0002085532,0.0002201733,0.00001777063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005506475,0.0005685727,0.7330798,0.0001950014,0.004711986,0.00001708694,0.0130463,0.06695533,0.01818558,0.06750887,0.08610966,0.009071165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001150653,0.00001922379,0.2242278,0.00006075894,0.0006465738,0.000007057967,0.01004766,0.05418395,0.0002741668,0.001102832,0.707891,0.0003882938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154292,0.0004516132,0.03739779,0.004024524,0.0006295497,0.0005123244,0.000009003524,0.00007717373,0.04146882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921094,0.000002532497,0.001929296,0.0009068229,0.0009743266,0.000009712574,0.000008617696,0.000009682656,0.004049582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6217813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.742074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389987823","doi":"10.59403/270cv5x","title":"Sovereign Immunity and Source State Taxation of Sovereign Wealth Funds: Is It Time to Re-Evaluate?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Tax Journal","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereign immunity; Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Sovereign wealth fund; International law; Business; Customary international law; Sovereign state; Economics; Law and economics; Foreign direct investment; International trade; Law; Political science; Public international law; Constitution","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02152910906258898,"gpt":0.2388890148251457,"spread":0.2173599057625567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009113351,0.0001944629,0.000286698,0.0002685058,0.0002626326,0.0001922104,0.0002579923,0.00004257241,0.003821024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003338087,0.0001455356,0.00008366505,0.0004101396,0.00006887018,0.001069875,0.0001691906,0.0001959208,0.0007321424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007355039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006069244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002991848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009991002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998456,0.00003119186,0.0004768095,0.0002164984,0.0004557077,0.0003637671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981149,0.00007354547,0.001229855,0.0002318965,0.0002986834,0.00005105044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00109094,0.0002221297,0.02105706,0.0002736842,0.0001525068,0.00003930066,0.001749809,0.00009000723,0.01146569,0.02459422,0.6611602,0.2781045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004696332,0.0001658225,0.1909678,0.001378714,0.000159207,0.00004464194,0.0007406823,0.0006490691,0.001423464,0.07916272,0.7194982,0.001113275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8815428,0.0006332858,0.009514987,0.01098833,0.0005719375,0.0004958019,0.0001320886,0.00006012257,0.09606063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602443,0.0002269705,0.0004214133,0.00390147,0.0008935175,0.000005304258,0.00000419771,0.00003956596,0.03426324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2769912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}