{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":86,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":86,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"a2d656b69581","filters":{"venue":"World Trade Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W1974077603","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605002624","title":"Multilateralism compromised: the mysterious origins of GATT Article XXIV","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Charter; Treaty; Political science; International trade; Free trade; Law; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01688627737135338,"gpt":0.292756967364547,"spread":0.2758706899931936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005184481,0.0001333589,0.0003275542,0.00004332158,0.000296137,0.00005195283,0.0003883954,0.00002977237,0.0007660674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004168095,0.00009677703,0.0001227275,0.001122248,0.0003464864,0.0001348923,0.00002413776,0.0001260186,0.0001128198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001176003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008274334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001259782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003002927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983195,0.000321452,0.000490364,0.0001973113,0.0003776819,0.0002936868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992182,0.0001324082,0.0002024506,0.0003306678,0.00004131215,0.0000749985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003981454,0.0001831094,0.004056666,0.0007747922,0.00003052929,0.000009246122,0.001237138,0.00001632483,0.001107799,0.9718037,0.0155459,0.005230867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002128772,0.000005096089,0.01319961,0.0006412712,0.00006695395,0.000002429106,0.0000245947,0.000009848359,0.0005774457,0.0002913103,0.984841,0.0001275151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07013845,0.172623,0.0001228471,0.640681,0.001502409,0.00600145,0.00005632861,0.0008182307,0.1080562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913602,0.004671572,0.0002872546,0.001774395,0.0002002939,0.00002141741,0.000005873106,0.00002133137,0.001657689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8387901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129285424","doi":"10.1017/s1474745610000303","title":"Transparency as a trade policy tool: the WTO's cloudy windows","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Subsidy; International trade; Corporate governance; Business; International economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Finance; Law; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01852309315563454,"gpt":0.3236709967197642,"spread":0.3051479035641296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001098722,0.0003030434,0.0005013264,0.0001227967,0.0008603494,0.0001557913,0.001103659,0.0000978395,0.003710987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004776687,0.0002196838,0.0002965002,0.00289763,0.0005654444,0.0003010354,0.00002508036,0.0007526691,0.0003217385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008173425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005493531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004296817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01030219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970649,0.0005150545,0.0006420455,0.0004314626,0.000702856,0.0006436252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984875,0.0002982339,0.0002023472,0.0007128641,0.00002362043,0.0002754047],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002873412,0.0001442297,0.0004665499,0.0002849106,0.00003816069,0.00001096046,0.002432767,6.77243e-7,0.00007798382,0.9405741,0.01966838,0.03629841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002430357,0.00001262967,0.003632272,0.0004096147,0.0001285121,0.00001390317,0.00005873529,0.000001178168,0.00005747774,0.001616849,0.9935411,0.0002847064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007616446,0.02657024,0.00001109024,0.8026417,0.0008332038,0.002006418,0.00001778702,0.000353892,0.166804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9316448,0.04158142,0.0001753102,0.02109252,0.001636328,0.0001083059,0.00001341367,0.00006607316,0.003681852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885667906","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000198","title":"What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Digital Protectionism?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; The Internet; International trade; Censorship; Reputation; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04026959468388808,"gpt":0.3192790163898054,"spread":0.2790094217059174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005344894,0.0002467286,0.0005079924,0.00008100414,0.00141577,0.0006840011,0.0003724784,0.00007354507,0.000906217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001587924,0.0002229629,0.0002786302,0.000751769,0.0007341928,0.001311116,0.00009159136,0.0002988709,0.0002945985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001283256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009092327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001975083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01372482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979044,0.0001844509,0.0004135402,0.0004255969,0.0005411963,0.0005308596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991148,0.0000877613,0.0002493575,0.0003006757,0.00008003298,0.0001674123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000814605,0.0001349185,0.000275816,0.002139948,0.0001388862,0.00002693432,0.03160659,9.250816e-8,0.000003051432,0.02087859,0.0582643,0.8865227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001073887,0.00002247496,0.0003781447,0.01484483,0.00006553123,0.000005684674,0.003366954,5.303245e-7,0.00001021656,0.003822308,0.9770947,0.0002813062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002831423,0.7702873,0.00003086302,0.1550989,0.001714808,0.001495107,0.00001821211,0.0003113649,0.07076036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2086218,0.7766452,0.00007914465,0.002175602,0.001720934,0.0001922139,0.000005546632,0.00003269032,0.01052682],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049361211","doi":"10.1017/s147474562000035x","title":"Introducing the Electronic Database of Investment Treaties (EDIT): The Genesis of a New Database and Its Use","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Database; Computer science; Electronic database; Investment (military); Intelligent database; Information retrieval; Politics; Database design; Database schema; Political science; Database testing; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0511446422888861,"gpt":0.2545331859944016,"spread":0.2033885437055155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000278752,0.0001277329,0.0002260314,0.00004719024,0.00008288857,0.00005602681,0.0002339646,0.000008327868,0.0002357909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001983453,0.00007116801,0.00007126774,0.0004312262,0.00006122015,0.0006901751,0.00009839526,0.0001008046,0.00001555128],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001143644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004615323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003330544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001277576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990609,0.00003254514,0.0003643131,0.000179834,0.0002346794,0.000127784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993616,0.00007727205,0.0002745926,0.0002266886,0.00004324858,0.00001657815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001641334,0.00003709237,0.0002232664,0.002172946,0.00007921575,8.648147e-7,0.00009553767,0.000008498315,0.0007349603,0.9394233,0.05617641,0.001031544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002818594,0.00001494205,0.0007654909,0.001146907,0.0003522073,0.000001573664,0.00003765134,0.001572071,0.0006562112,0.0003806846,0.9946736,0.0001168651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04874473,0.5251912,0.0002863749,0.4050315,0.0003896543,0.004033495,0.000112429,0.000122162,0.01608848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5117819,0.1103681,0.0003894723,0.3741254,0.002097601,0.000095351,0.0003444173,0.00005144841,0.0007462912],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9390426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2902147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993517717","doi":"10.1017/s1474745604001600","title":"Changing the terms of trade policy making: from the ‘club’ to the ‘multistakeholder’ model","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Club; Transparency (behavior); Legitimacy; Openness to experience; Commercial policy; Economics; Ambiguity; Political science; International trade; International economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06120985283662886,"gpt":0.3395801901826325,"spread":0.2783703373460036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001069408,0.0002121037,0.0003484323,0.00008128007,0.0009836117,0.000105853,0.00139506,0.00004009627,0.0001214607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003234334,0.0001083546,0.0002035276,0.003193248,0.0003612775,0.0001327479,0.00008381377,0.0002849415,0.0000452226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001621061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002421999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003812506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004645826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977158,0.0003697715,0.000484113,0.0002950527,0.0006420305,0.0004932396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985993,0.0003290406,0.0002342123,0.0007172067,0.00001790637,0.0001023617],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002926091,0.00006751998,0.0001146168,0.0001468309,0.00005777149,0.000002674316,0.0301105,0.001339535,0.00003704564,0.936039,0.007891116,0.02419049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000185154,0.000006368814,0.001867325,0.001929457,0.0001325454,0.000002125823,0.0006582918,0.00005128475,0.00007254721,0.003327561,0.9915665,0.0002008287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000154626,0.02266436,0.0008372405,0.9608377,0.0001846692,0.00172787,0.00005311249,0.00009663143,0.01344382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95134,0.008040462,0.0005317161,0.03869985,0.0007020056,0.00006316658,0.000006525075,0.00004039732,0.0005759026],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7565245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123846870","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000063","title":"<i>Canada–Renewable Energy:</i> Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So-Green Subsidies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Tariff; Renewable energy; Tribunal; Jurisprudence; Arbitration; Government (linguistics); Investment (military); Electricity; European union; Feed-in tariff; Economics; Business; Treaty; International economics; International trade; Law; Energy policy; Market economy; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1738962244624373,"gpt":0.2777504323982687,"spread":0.1038542079358314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003291138,0.0001843967,0.0005876492,0.00008036701,0.0001424928,0.00004609047,0.0001927096,0.00004037207,0.00004428876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002724781,0.0002042177,0.0001050901,0.000170876,0.00005564563,0.0001188746,0.00004058471,0.00006421724,0.00003274155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001601417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006378152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4150534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7612107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987392,0.00001036256,0.0005532681,0.0003628354,0.00002098393,0.0003133061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906,0.0001117943,0.000244779,0.0003708104,0.00001407652,0.0001985821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001098875,0.00003080479,0.001269631,0.0009393557,0.00004822567,5.312801e-7,0.00005786618,0.000008879212,0.000001344959,0.8605233,0.1322598,0.004849264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002794027,0.00002630881,0.0008359508,0.0002048376,0.00002222358,0.000003946189,0.000004395346,0.00005775324,0.00002226203,0.02447686,0.973831,0.0002350829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007186949,0.5321012,0.0002284981,0.3346537,0.0004651285,0.001242343,0.005357639,0.00008943576,0.1251434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2673666,0.4087698,0.0009465064,0.3024424,0.001232711,0.001287691,0.0005677636,0.0001974569,0.01718914],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8327755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811416109","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000435","title":"Learning about Digital Trade: Privacy and E-Commerce in CETA and TPP","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; European union; International trade; Free trade agreement; State (computer science); Member state; Personally identifiable information; Work (physics); Business; Political science; Free trade; Member states; Law; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0409335125693818,"gpt":0.2269763482867891,"spread":0.1860428357174073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000326772,0.0001936432,0.0007246558,0.0001368259,0.0000399729,0.0001236706,0.0001607247,0.00005373645,0.0001787253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004331399,0.00021892,0.00009211579,0.0002553471,0.00004107237,0.0004312628,0.00006092732,0.0002970203,0.0003126449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004672196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007449895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001767647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001133937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985558,0.00001535206,0.000650143,0.0004486535,0.00002171683,0.0003082731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993869,0.00006140845,0.0002009484,0.0002394363,0.000001524823,0.0001097933],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007024493,0.00008618816,0.833042,0.002580999,0.00005156199,0.000007026922,0.0003004915,0.00001668293,0.00000176351,0.09639624,0.00121679,0.06629322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004198776,0.00003111671,0.2999342,0.0006875859,0.000007635143,0.00001667089,0.00001464202,0.0001918673,6.376842e-7,0.001250081,0.6971985,0.0002472295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4517747,0.474774,0.000005371411,0.009833788,0.000179871,0.0006890764,0.00005064644,0.00004508235,0.06264742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8405225,0.1574437,0.00006561333,0.001213993,0.00002892348,0.00001017156,0.00001334599,0.00002170007,0.0006800675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6959817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8927299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125641524","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000342","title":"First Diagnose, Then Treat: What Ails the Doha Round?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; International trade; Blame; Commodity; International economics; China; Corporate governance; World trade; Economics; Political science; Business; Market economy; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.157992342439702,"gpt":0.2504435050415083,"spread":0.09245116260180625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000853542,0.0002593458,0.0007317032,0.00008295936,0.0001326597,0.00029992,0.0005910547,0.00005819972,0.0004872834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009227739,0.0002077018,0.0003082059,0.0004391248,0.00007541679,0.000738,0.00006084185,0.0002114615,0.003751717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001815496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002542935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001436294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002979303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982575,0.0000313661,0.0008031022,0.0004407383,0.00004632487,0.0004209249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985746,0.0001312046,0.0003258454,0.0007485623,0.00001028514,0.0002095311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001532135,0.0002713886,0.01281192,0.001170172,0.0001966988,0.00002828498,0.0007506351,0.00008568186,8.646482e-8,0.6393357,0.3153316,0.03000255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003212855,0.00003310348,0.00332869,0.0006858852,0.00003628089,0.00001938989,0.00006307695,0.00005750637,0.000001166144,0.01503111,0.9801511,0.0002714515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001413749,0.852329,0.00002470031,0.06160012,0.0008144028,0.0006720567,0.00005702263,0.00006178,0.08302717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1886282,0.796217,0.0001512008,0.01205139,0.0003683609,0.0001629259,0.00002620129,0.00004679219,0.002347967],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6648195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915722993","doi":"10.1017/s1474745603001393","title":"Regulatory transparency, developing countries and the WTO","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Developing country; Globalization; Business; Corporate governance; Democracy; Independence (probability theory); International trade; Adaptation (eye); International economics; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Law; Finance; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0220417952504023,"gpt":0.285603240487127,"spread":0.2635614452367247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001358495,0.0001299346,0.0003138416,0.0000383614,0.0006170637,0.00006987821,0.0001991403,0.0000292596,0.0005714903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001672762,0.00008988034,0.00006255545,0.0008085436,0.0007243975,0.0001562895,0.000007205736,0.0001134347,0.00002844202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006304504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002024552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002595648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001334196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982805,0.0006218253,0.0003189501,0.0002009658,0.0003318239,0.000245917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993315,0.0002607632,0.00009439944,0.0002034314,0.00002586543,0.00008398915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001062936,0.000004000666,0.0005533234,0.0003037262,0.00001202804,0.000001026056,0.0009599094,1.28334e-7,3.150353e-7,0.9936503,0.003516062,0.0009980714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002509816,0.000001320284,0.001921059,0.0008864072,0.00006887942,0.000003581933,0.00005784367,1.544745e-7,0.00002429984,0.001668226,0.994986,0.0001312629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002107897,0.4772696,0.0001439794,0.4261543,0.0003071213,0.001140438,0.000002789018,0.0001540017,0.09461689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4966699,0.4825132,0.0006263994,0.01724428,0.0000972075,0.00004560923,0.000002372406,0.00002645197,0.002774583],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6257418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031991483","doi":"10.1017/s1474745606002928","title":"Trade rules and climate change subsidies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Protectionism; Scope (computer science); Greenhouse gas; Limiting; Climate change; Economics; Public economics; International economics; International trade; Natural resource economics; Business; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1320475328909359,"gpt":0.2685674010893236,"spread":0.1365198681983877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003744725,0.000215299,0.0006981918,0.0001681458,0.0001144439,0.00005816798,0.0001379147,0.00004926593,0.0003287186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001329294,0.0002377662,0.0001543989,0.0001902791,0.00006937283,0.000229689,0.00004554691,0.0001193299,0.0004488259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004842862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000254266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001631181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004706853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998481,0.00001345261,0.0006872822,0.0003714022,0.00001893491,0.0004279274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999333,0.0000482319,0.0002753983,0.0002619324,0.00000192466,0.00007949346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004427888,0.00008096007,0.02811033,0.004068862,0.0000281139,0.000007368476,0.0002008223,3.038013e-7,0.00000196216,0.947735,0.007912117,0.01184977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002804046,0.00001698027,0.09452919,0.0009650527,0.00003218951,0.00002266632,0.00001080079,0.00005878299,0.00000853021,0.01488886,0.8887709,0.0004156038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0111824,0.908388,0.000004333635,0.03206428,0.0002505594,0.0005510004,0.0007165942,0.00008887851,0.04675393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1796509,0.8138382,0.0002680728,0.005243429,0.0005301128,0.0001423419,0.00008691794,0.00004504965,0.0001949768],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9695824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065220538","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000317","title":"Renewable Energy and Government Support: Time to ‘Green’ the SCM Agreement?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Renewable energy; Treaty; Greenhouse gas; Incentive; Feed-in tariff; Tariff; Government (linguistics); Energy subsidies; Fossil fuel; International trade; Economics; Business; Duty; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Energy policy; Market economy; Political science; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01078378338088246,"gpt":0.2445499064041004,"spread":0.233766123023218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001036144,0.0001472449,0.0002815767,0.00002673526,0.0004113815,0.00008071261,0.0003836895,0.00002549654,0.006610168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001299528,0.0001105624,0.00006212632,0.00086154,0.0001389226,0.0001158088,0.00007446939,0.00006171411,0.0004758105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001075194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005275631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007074742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00990893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980706,0.0003586702,0.0003036493,0.0002822947,0.0006584218,0.0003263809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991307,0.0001498973,0.0001123523,0.0003576243,0.00001805589,0.0002313424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003107915,0.00006539732,0.0003038191,0.0003065098,0.00004427142,0.000002852424,0.0006541719,0.000006539579,0.00007043659,0.2910818,0.6085269,0.09893413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008487409,0.00001986678,0.0004568289,0.000365554,0.0000608378,0.000001416263,0.00001655382,0.000004491549,0.00004995994,0.0002684257,0.9985251,0.000146082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001483198,0.01785661,0.0001342646,0.5275401,0.0001518145,0.0007007701,0.000009902898,0.000100394,0.4534912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2139034,0.04560327,0.0009613847,0.1148099,0.001195841,0.0001643884,0.00002229141,0.00009480466,0.6232448],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4127303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115457048","doi":"10.1017/s1474745613000220","title":"Law, politics, and the true cost of protectionism: the choice of trade remedies or binding overhang","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Protectionism; Flexibility (engineering); Government (linguistics); Politics; Economics; Law and economics; International economics; International trade; Public economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09272934411199478,"gpt":0.2548911846639833,"spread":0.1621618405519885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006185265,0.0001492491,0.0006978929,0.0000630174,0.0001444079,0.00004308534,0.0002627409,0.0000409631,0.0002272639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001496353,0.00009255108,0.0001732281,0.0002774736,0.0003860203,0.0001726676,0.00003782888,0.0001729903,0.00003529736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004129746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001386159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001090537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003501852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986055,0.00004342158,0.0008631197,0.000211904,0.00003624878,0.0002397586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987754,0.0002721627,0.000536732,0.0003524924,0.000008608866,0.00005465026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008963068,0.00004493891,0.001813589,0.002030496,0.0001365121,3.139881e-7,0.0002282497,0.000004127794,0.000009368567,0.9890459,0.003250795,0.003426736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00125864,0.00005798514,0.01567147,0.001499861,0.0001046003,0.00002028269,0.0001266831,0.0002129084,0.0002374558,0.01880746,0.9617165,0.0002861835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0404086,0.6855524,0.0001039016,0.1698775,0.001239718,0.01047805,0.0005147094,0.00008366873,0.09174152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8856848,0.1103512,0.0001970152,0.002755085,0.0001191139,0.0002255367,0.000005009765,0.00002345935,0.000638796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3774123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124062783","doi":"10.1017/s1474745609990048","title":"The special safeguard fiasco in the WTO: the perils of inadequate analysis and negotiation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguard; Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); Swift; Political science; Modalities; Work (physics); Law and economics; Agriculture; Fidelity; International trade; Business; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Social science; History; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01515955382340115,"gpt":0.3023095048318696,"spread":0.2871499510084685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001962102,0.00010744,0.0002882933,0.00008103404,0.0005305017,0.0001043408,0.0004781554,0.00002508175,0.0001934959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002822986,0.00005277532,0.0001334491,0.004028078,0.0002850503,0.0001254261,0.00001296539,0.0001709515,0.000006472229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004339893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005500437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001258523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01562571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978286,0.0009281177,0.0004178603,0.0001591216,0.0004548981,0.0002113877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988977,0.0005266486,0.0002077417,0.0003056394,0.0000253379,0.00003696068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006684565,0.00007438374,0.005066787,0.0001029952,0.0001030551,0.00000219399,0.01089486,0.00001427713,0.000008181439,0.8200118,0.008176298,0.1555385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000860619,0.0000125989,0.2402525,0.0001734179,0.0003505177,6.998508e-7,0.0004572693,0.000008573549,0.000009361973,0.001160504,0.7574039,0.00008470812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004058039,0.08635343,0.00003395662,0.8737662,0.0001906755,0.001497493,0.000005417886,0.00003238652,0.03406237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9216373,0.0748764,0.00002534572,0.002752773,0.0003806389,0.000009726641,0.000003634354,0.00000497153,0.0003092407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9175792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.871951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154067369","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000130","title":"The Creation of the Multilateral Trade Court: Design and Experiential Learning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Legalization; Experiential learning; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Settlement (finance); International trade; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04094902729198923,"gpt":0.3157790882915472,"spread":0.2748300609995579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001157864,0.00009441726,0.0001785662,0.00002217216,0.0005685982,0.00006772848,0.0002476678,0.00002765142,0.0000610786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000360565,0.00005734692,0.00005934883,0.0006168637,0.0004111509,0.0001364532,0.00002512558,0.0001493171,0.00000520943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004771204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001203087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004650254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000187471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980684,0.0009473782,0.0002813743,0.0001386321,0.0003824212,0.0001817834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993227,0.0002165567,0.0001769399,0.0001581849,0.00002856225,0.00009702979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008280708,0.0003300272,0.01838836,0.001173766,0.0002203909,0.000008236248,0.1104871,0.0005939756,0.0006479318,0.5525648,0.06508821,0.2504144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001867738,0.00001134683,0.003169389,0.0004477604,0.00005847595,0.00000210816,0.0003882803,0.00006405903,0.0002055048,0.0001515679,0.9952282,0.00008654484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005833914,0.3355887,0.00196091,0.6189384,0.002226606,0.006334171,0.000006092445,0.0003878491,0.02872338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980141,0.01711858,0.0005069915,0.0003959723,0.0001199573,0.00002384569,0.000001581633,0.00001616903,0.00167594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9743071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4373255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001342683","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000500","title":"Boomerangs over Lac Léman: Transnational Lobbying and Foreign Venue Shopping in WTO Dispute Settlement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Settlement (finance); International trade; Business; World trade; Government (linguistics); China; Foreign direct investment; International economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Payment; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04105414892897555,"gpt":0.2685076129532956,"spread":0.22745346402432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003882851,0.0001279288,0.0001901068,0.0001626806,0.00005137707,0.00009600201,0.0001009397,0.00001718611,0.0002826847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002013249,0.0001189175,0.00005753459,0.000310916,0.00002675946,0.000693822,0.00002665188,0.0001005556,0.00003439796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004778323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001801272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002046164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001900106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990354,0.00001389011,0.0003140811,0.0001883068,0.0002908058,0.0001575633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997481,0.0000179123,0.0001028825,0.00008038209,0.00002896809,0.00002179487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006283364,0.00003953056,0.004069526,0.0007783254,0.00001525506,0.000007596826,0.00002213362,0.00001141099,0.0000149212,0.9815829,0.01181869,0.001633373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005964172,0.000003969329,0.01011268,0.0009974026,0.00003626887,0.000002383814,0.00001123505,0.001379753,0.000003950798,0.005341113,0.9813504,0.0001644582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02450406,0.09708267,0.0005769826,0.2720017,0.001256435,0.003534796,0.00006435936,0.0002663963,0.6007126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8893343,0.001603915,0.0003016013,0.107337,0.0006114207,0.0001128294,0.0002336473,0.00003096752,0.0004342868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4849313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564572718","doi":"10.1017/s147474560300140x","title":"International regime conflict in trade and environment: the Biosafety Protocol and the WTO","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Biosafety; Precautionary principle; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); International trade; Obligation; Agriculture; Business; Sustainable development; Political science; Biotechnology; Law; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02349850805963754,"gpt":0.2996886472987039,"spread":0.2761901392390664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001410411,0.0001266743,0.0002267305,0.00003876332,0.0002787495,0.00007572406,0.000259092,0.00002904902,0.0006367503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001618666,0.00007208517,0.00004660345,0.0004062871,0.0007920541,0.0001270841,0.00002588357,0.0001920094,0.0000105971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003360653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003079746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002058409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998202,0.000781022,0.0003162973,0.000222097,0.0002925472,0.0001859899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993269,0.0002860707,0.0001216998,0.0001945057,0.000003740324,0.00006708175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006560222,0.00003120815,0.0007519535,0.0001137013,0.00001682934,0.000001888226,0.001379864,4.997187e-7,0.000003823402,0.9897075,0.001605192,0.006380991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007386475,0.000003597313,0.006103488,0.0003066161,0.00002455533,0.000007000325,0.00007559673,0.000003160136,0.00001119209,0.0005926364,0.9920425,0.00009103142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000250584,0.02519667,0.00001042091,0.8252946,0.00008792379,0.04752576,0.000004852998,0.00004158563,0.1018131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6003591,0.3337882,0.0004678637,0.02294109,0.0003813121,0.03575141,0.000008798212,0.00008042176,0.006221697],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.697197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146523027","doi":"10.1017/s1474745613000128","title":"Fragmentation in international trade law: insights from the global investment regime","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bilateralism; International trade; International economics; Treaty; Economics; International economic law; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; International trade law; Trade barrier; Free trade; Harmonization; International law; Politics; Political science; Multilateralism; Public international law; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02138041758655115,"gpt":0.2497585064742518,"spread":0.2283780888877007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001091856,0.0001706963,0.0001865098,0.00005718654,0.00008458896,0.0002546869,0.0003705739,0.00002647854,0.001567245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002528867,0.0001190655,0.0001008572,0.0004062008,0.00006015483,0.001264312,0.00005238015,0.0001304326,0.0006831057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001374717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001424172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001943277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001523166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987416,0.0000335099,0.0004538533,0.000244076,0.0003798283,0.0001470906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995362,0.00004171518,0.0002046285,0.0001832572,0.00001765428,0.00001649898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000269502,0.00007716919,0.0009770209,0.00007219463,0.00002934101,0.000002599204,0.00002185183,0.000004686934,0.00002071473,0.9634823,0.03422947,0.001080026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003774868,0.000002720612,0.03473071,0.0008716616,0.00003466988,9.113364e-7,0.00002553814,0.000602348,0.0000124528,0.04487801,0.9183136,0.0001499216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007374744,0.01714974,0.00002155273,0.2839772,0.001121572,0.001668653,0.00001172253,0.0001167062,0.6885581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5060334,0.001704206,0.0001742142,0.4906794,0.0007532099,0.0002016105,0.0003062273,0.00001345961,0.0001342536],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893122135","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605002454","title":"United States-Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Subsidy; Dumping; International trade; Legislation; Business; Consistency (knowledge bases); International economics; Political science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02203739913115813,"gpt":0.3014133839099447,"spread":0.2793759847787865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006789868,0.0001351641,0.0003776198,0.0001597174,0.0001740011,0.00003536549,0.0002052904,0.00003474281,0.001118247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001339332,0.0001300249,0.0000666105,0.001956171,0.0002159106,0.0002263296,0.00001999055,0.0001356644,0.00004159523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007667588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001171186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002580998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00273697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984846,0.0002922768,0.0004430794,0.0002097725,0.0003005529,0.000269689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992521,0.0001551155,0.0002039844,0.00019838,0.00004792083,0.0001424633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003463307,0.0006905652,0.04333043,0.006786702,0.000354289,0.00002755725,0.02248685,0.00006421937,0.0004382363,0.4535799,0.1314243,0.3407823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001920795,0.000006112698,0.007512907,0.001218878,0.00006953828,0.000001555729,0.00005279157,0.00001258525,0.0001260493,0.00004484791,0.9906205,0.0001421466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04901613,0.3937962,0.0000465789,0.4943745,0.0003690192,0.00290957,0.00008396908,0.0005517454,0.05885226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8279988,0.1652155,0.0005630776,0.003548816,0.000157648,0.000009097977,0.00005428178,0.00002689887,0.002425925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8591962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079600291","doi":"10.1017/s1474745613000232","title":"Sealing animal welfare into the GATT exceptions: the international dimension of animal welfare in WTO disputes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Argument (complex analysis); Welfare; CONTEST; Relevance (law); Law and economics; International law; Dimension (graph theory); Economics; Political science; International trade; Public economics; Law; Business; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02061315627317476,"gpt":0.299930995306578,"spread":0.2793178390334032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009013634,0.0001696831,0.0002926741,0.00009898723,0.0006290867,0.0001078938,0.0008218862,0.00004432562,0.003603491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002923957,0.0001062826,0.0001311541,0.001490748,0.000370508,0.0003813877,0.0001147572,0.0002769705,0.00007971391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001158121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006445437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001431124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004555166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977911,0.0004454145,0.0005785396,0.0002745942,0.0006326415,0.0002776843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990487,0.0002117579,0.0002378753,0.0003206774,0.00009988299,0.00008114598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009848635,0.0001513001,0.009108189,0.0004551614,0.00005425615,0.000003762526,0.006577963,0.00001319125,0.0005252513,0.9571064,0.00915686,0.01683782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001528916,0.00002045087,0.1168185,0.00122215,0.00004974193,0.000002379368,0.0017811,0.00004088577,0.00006070316,0.0002435802,0.8794373,0.0001703998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0190125,0.03039347,0.000004293722,0.943394,0.0002551558,0.001240305,0.000006358309,0.00006913517,0.005624754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834802,0.01410643,0.0002304785,0.001630373,0.0001890922,0.00009312177,0.00001657838,0.0000222722,0.0002314855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9644676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592072136","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000283","title":"Sunshine over Shanghai: Can the WTO Illuminate the Murky World of Chinese SOEs?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); Business; Politics; International trade; Investment (military); World trade; International economics; China; Economics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06923715656236683,"gpt":0.2660062708860524,"spread":0.1967691143236856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009753879,0.0003036862,0.001072305,0.00009554861,0.0004116731,0.0001446353,0.001434156,0.00004138167,0.001413063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001452239,0.0001778179,0.0006502687,0.0002954326,0.0002755548,0.0002288489,0.0001561911,0.0003035821,0.0001696212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006278321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001603495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000659598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006524137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982029,0.00003389785,0.000925399,0.0003943884,0.00005398271,0.0003894478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970687,0.0001248288,0.001038423,0.001662799,0.00001110054,0.00009414033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000217921,0.0002551184,0.2760684,0.002721591,0.001660638,0.00001705209,0.0005404304,0.00003523891,0.000005220048,0.6418447,0.06436946,0.01246037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002218093,0.00001406508,0.1855127,0.0002823944,0.0001561762,0.00000580689,0.000005707971,0.00008070623,0.000008542626,0.01171036,0.8017479,0.000253855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05363872,0.6233433,0.000008098872,0.1613286,0.001315329,0.001571471,0.0006483663,0.0000534978,0.1580925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9140885,0.07649165,0.00003178708,0.004791313,0.0002048971,0.00007206447,0.000011478,0.00003332618,0.004274916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945768354","doi":"10.1017/s147474561900020x","title":"Three Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: The Conundrum of the US Steel and Aluminum Tariffs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; International trade; China; Member states; Political science; Business; International economics; European union; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01523487275832287,"gpt":0.2579629147767578,"spread":0.242728042018435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008938496,0.0001658736,0.0003957317,0.00003402182,0.0003479331,0.00007245157,0.0006839503,0.00004924641,0.001571076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009238468,0.00009368404,0.0001435375,0.001119337,0.0006167853,0.0001102838,0.00009063037,0.0002507696,0.00009258428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004757294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000146612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002738171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01075967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981665,0.0003081168,0.0004042244,0.0002753548,0.0005497853,0.0002960279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987839,0.0002418364,0.0002666293,0.0005821824,0.00004064047,0.00008483099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000389602,0.00005447782,0.02163344,0.0008916981,0.00006227838,0.000001781775,0.001315392,0.000001103962,0.00007264848,0.9564319,0.007958034,0.01157336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001798231,0.000008046912,0.0617693,0.001007986,0.0001106012,0.000003699469,0.00005510337,0.000002585989,0.00006597556,0.000535449,0.9361306,0.0001308281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02748582,0.1807823,0.0000119284,0.6519736,0.001718592,0.006590242,0.00005189735,0.0001657229,0.1312198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766028,0.01275432,0.00007990623,0.004875646,0.0001205309,0.0000217077,0.000001869937,0.00002615572,0.005517068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527819544","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000446","title":"Reforming WTO-Civil Society Engagement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Civil society; Negotiation; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Value (mathematics); Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06715491265145038,"gpt":0.3711115192750146,"spread":0.3039566066235642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001732279,0.0001585075,0.0003245254,0.00002965093,0.002738654,0.0002120845,0.0008466377,0.00004197755,0.001991059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003164832,0.0001449231,0.0002317046,0.0003612287,0.0003234899,0.000486186,0.0001025822,0.0002628397,0.0002474361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001856574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001388088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001811528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003021788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998239,0.0002174167,0.0003439179,0.0002973843,0.0005008943,0.0004014052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986939,0.0000708921,0.0003070046,0.0007180183,0.00003423151,0.0001759767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001340661,0.0001211567,0.002651579,0.001850466,0.0001116115,0.00001384845,0.00462396,5.927753e-7,0.00004565672,0.7167183,0.1589294,0.1149321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001209755,0.000003440799,0.003572593,0.001439577,0.00007133144,8.252538e-7,0.00008614658,0.000001338504,0.00002888687,0.0002034698,0.9942896,0.0001818653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001370263,0.07444985,0.00004173069,0.4091604,0.0008845736,0.001280446,0.000007040449,0.0003572729,0.5136817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7492427,0.218993,0.00153688,0.008196954,0.000836708,0.00005664748,0.00001219928,0.00005327156,0.02107164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8353602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989213,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2930275906","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000460","title":"Mapping the New Frontier of International IP Law: Introducing a TRIPs-plus Dataset","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Intellectual property; TRIPS Agreement; Frontier; Consistency (knowledge bases); Order (exchange); International trade; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1145358536646165,"gpt":0.2474208265254448,"spread":0.1328849728608284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004885417,0.0001308151,0.0002973031,0.00009671676,0.00006211275,0.00007965593,0.0004929026,0.00001937735,0.003736748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000806082,0.00008131378,0.0001060918,0.0004151422,0.00002766832,0.0004472697,0.0001326259,0.0001741684,0.001093431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002065996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001997179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004217219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007353642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990043,0.00002088383,0.0003683773,0.0002142886,0.0002290332,0.00016314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999377,0.00003950082,0.0002034582,0.0003415899,0.00002938105,0.000009040678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002711773,0.00002984619,0.0002528067,0.002535584,0.00009584519,0.000001977456,0.0000639467,0.00001721094,0.00006882155,0.01095231,0.9420632,0.04389129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002644056,0.000002550943,0.0001768096,0.002271183,0.00005427805,0.000002024935,0.00001711059,0.0005747253,0.00001993956,0.0001786388,0.9963285,0.0001098293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002081995,0.3581669,0.001594332,0.1769424,0.009640303,0.005468155,0.0002021559,0.0002327965,0.445671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7107124,0.04442031,0.001342236,0.1896963,0.01027436,0.0000875599,0.004130515,0.00016478,0.03917154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7086304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592092604","doi":"10.1017/s147474561700009x","title":"Consolidating International Investment Law: The Mega-Regionals as a Pathway towards Multilateral Rules","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; International trade law; International economic law; Multilateralism; International law; Investment (military); General partnership; Political science; Brexit; Foreign direct investment; European union; Economics; Public international law; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04903472869731897,"gpt":0.3004074239665645,"spread":0.2513726952692455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004857629,0.0002190479,0.0002524851,0.00007503809,0.0006751769,0.0009100547,0.0008687787,0.00002654041,0.001532512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001752461,0.0001454219,0.0002027916,0.00006936172,0.0002029125,0.001262287,0.0002041806,0.0001710818,0.000769902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004622711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000419635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000484027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002515899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985459,0.00002535869,0.0004541914,0.0002738385,0.0004856683,0.0002150334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988844,0.00003682063,0.0005358133,0.0004226674,0.00009739916,0.00002283674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005305372,0.00005180757,0.00008493158,0.000216657,0.00006334775,0.0000100136,0.0000143998,0.000001535835,0.00003815463,0.9838263,0.01328517,0.002402387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003103507,0.000003478776,0.001528166,0.001379456,0.00004901139,0.000009140961,0.000006457819,0.0005924581,0.0001126176,0.01352805,0.9822951,0.0001857109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006261122,0.003416986,0.00001064206,0.1062986,0.0007212865,0.0005681046,0.00001007178,0.00007486371,0.8882734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3621772,0.002024173,0.0002883348,0.6298811,0.001698869,0.0001829693,0.0001581644,0.00003253687,0.003556655],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984749704","doi":"10.1017/s1474745601001033","title":"Cross-agreement complaints before the Appellate Body: a case study of the <i>EC–Asbestos</i> dispute","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Political science; Agreement; Asbestos; International trade; Law; International trade law; World trade; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03897877207936114,"gpt":0.3212065220798093,"spread":0.2822277500004481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009568962,0.0002224705,0.0004273723,0.00004266032,0.001206502,0.00009698498,0.0008653094,0.00003265956,0.001991621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008570995,0.0001299786,0.00019437,0.002084338,0.0005637315,0.0001372749,0.0001252238,0.0002816481,0.0001099622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009259278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003714908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008062447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02576123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970477,0.0007476952,0.0006838026,0.00033208,0.0008018345,0.0003869419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985054,0.0001216538,0.0003735963,0.0008119566,0.00005976563,0.0001276308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001401416,0.0076569,0.3215404,0.004936363,0.001176249,0.001689113,0.1456185,0.0001347182,0.00002533552,0.2646333,0.1087485,0.1438266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004414301,0.00004530959,0.01276333,0.001081476,0.0002922549,0.0001244466,0.0009705939,0.00002229413,0.000007456868,0.0000528397,0.9840058,0.0001927439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2701356,0.1725325,0.00002615751,0.4325567,0.002829462,0.02175921,0.00009712021,0.0004785139,0.09958465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884106,0.004902132,0.00001767803,0.00204044,0.0001463846,0.00004195148,0.00000150822,0.00002634593,0.004412964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121279842","doi":"10.1017/s1474745614000226","title":"Shining a light on fossil fuel subsidies at the WTO: how NGOs can contribute to WTO notification and surveillance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; International Institute for Sustainable Development","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Business; Fossil fuel; International trade; International economics; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Market economy; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02031671370202529,"gpt":0.2757966118780876,"spread":0.2554798981760623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001447638,0.0001982815,0.0004064789,0.00006011589,0.0007419939,0.0001940212,0.0003430799,0.00004124974,0.0001208661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009563527,0.0001422774,0.00007255225,0.001039869,0.0002135022,0.0001083165,0.00004520875,0.0001546576,0.0000700924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001520472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004851952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001028285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04188312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978309,0.0006891515,0.0002856262,0.000393201,0.0004362183,0.0003648934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985947,0.0005324996,0.0001911465,0.0004148722,0.00006202624,0.0002047681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002551556,0.0001036228,0.02308045,0.001676304,0.0001070831,0.000005571543,0.01066525,0.00001002729,0.000514003,0.7609773,0.133675,0.06915985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001376841,0.00001572785,0.03073841,0.0006297219,0.00002853673,0.000001469099,0.00005172272,0.000003252205,0.0001253279,0.0001194828,0.9679581,0.0001905798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001185004,0.06103782,0.00004299571,0.9261346,0.0002788297,0.001153079,0.00002223103,0.0001417399,0.01000367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675329,0.02203472,0.00004584462,0.005735291,0.0002558136,0.00006803035,0.00001208901,0.00002529879,0.004289975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121914165","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000379","title":"Private Standards and the WTO: Reclusive No More","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Enforcement; Normative; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Product (mathematics); Bargaining power; Power (physics); Economics; Business; International trade; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01198706563371873,"gpt":0.3094595024585622,"spread":0.2974724368248435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001469615,0.000136739,0.0003353666,0.00003449552,0.0004442893,0.00005524811,0.0003128456,0.00002934875,0.001553644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009615686,0.0000667854,0.00008443724,0.0006769538,0.000939086,0.0001870446,0.00005429416,0.0001023506,0.00009077451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001286465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002596502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003740814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981748,0.0004766745,0.0002884123,0.0002341487,0.0005605935,0.000265353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989641,0.0004060678,0.0001378778,0.0002842258,0.00008114788,0.000126547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010532,0.00001260903,0.0003928637,0.0002613818,0.00002880674,0.000003528173,0.0007683731,2.386646e-8,0.00001579055,0.9283869,0.03988218,0.03023706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004856236,0.000004516463,0.0008524556,0.001819877,0.00006183629,0.000001949429,0.00001772872,1.855924e-7,0.00002327429,0.0009959748,0.9956192,0.0001174217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001296101,0.1112692,0.00005934761,0.822647,0.0003163918,0.00126867,0.00003269843,0.0001444092,0.06413268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3007452,0.6642659,0.0003718574,0.01523806,0.0006344011,0.00007754852,0.000003320473,0.00005351241,0.01861019],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587988646","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000586","title":"<i>US–COOL</i> Retaliation: The WTO's Article 22.6 Arbitration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Revenue; International trade; Business; World trade; International economics; Market access; Economics; Law; Political science; Geography; Agriculture; Accounting","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08592947312171006,"gpt":0.2544918361474361,"spread":0.1685623630257261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006357201,0.0001602534,0.0004300208,0.00003646433,0.0004723415,0.0002798458,0.0005518677,0.00004271054,0.0006954956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009725014,0.0001377724,0.0002311867,0.0001142437,0.00008392837,0.0004808395,0.00004354079,0.0001817496,0.001585021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006406426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001161388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006121034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001763392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986851,0.00001919636,0.0006655573,0.0003243739,0.00003402952,0.0002716959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998305,0.00003141749,0.0005849893,0.0009898521,0.000007894027,0.00008081603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000623607,0.00007833013,0.04062555,0.0004280353,0.00008403827,0.000004315625,0.00006283107,0.00001672984,0.000006948514,0.9022158,0.05139773,0.005073444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002009681,0.00001198333,0.1070617,0.0002289622,0.00002761521,0.000006725986,0.000003106436,0.0002052107,0.00004149945,0.01220531,0.8798111,0.0001957716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02535705,0.2630703,0.0001759176,0.1205388,0.001217486,0.001242759,0.0001052587,0.0001087102,0.5881837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9179385,0.06689829,0.0001895256,0.01260515,0.000339332,0.00006255407,0.00001518894,0.00002358446,0.001927843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8925815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123111527","doi":"10.1017/s1474745618000496","title":"The Effect of Binding Commitments on Services Trade","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Restrictiveness; Market access; Trade barrier; International economics; Gravity model of trade; Trade in services; International trade; Free trade; Business; Index (typography); Bilateral trade; Economics; Geography; China; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03266053105939871,"gpt":0.2362052777613243,"spread":0.2035447467019256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006829806,0.000182264,0.0006959552,0.00008002303,0.00007995676,0.00003618717,0.0004157636,0.00003826823,0.000189352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001104066,0.0001397727,0.0002669005,0.0002757546,0.00002761982,0.000103345,0.00002740029,0.0001572228,0.001659421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006421372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003824028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001570818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001629567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987012,0.00003827725,0.0006744145,0.0002759286,0.00003675418,0.0002733833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988425,0.0002077895,0.0004097548,0.0004781107,0.000001425225,0.00006042153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001146114,0.0002157046,0.3984323,0.01984905,0.0007405931,0.000005802991,0.0001518728,0.00008224195,0.00003188007,0.5165926,0.01322917,0.05055419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000629908,0.0002256412,0.01589329,0.00183028,0.00003293059,0.00000265294,0.000005747122,0.00007541364,0.0001879039,0.0006041998,0.9802944,0.0002176433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3733095,0.4327799,0.000001519334,0.01218458,0.001649166,0.002434127,0.0002285393,0.0000670223,0.1773456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303967,0.06770141,0.00001879709,0.001199982,0.00004193652,0.0000324916,0.00001639817,0.00002356002,0.0005686838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159189050","doi":"10.1017/s1474745609990280","title":"Continued suspense: <i>EC–Hormones</i> and WTO disciplines on discrimination and domestic regulation Appellate Body Reports: <i>Canada/United States – Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC – Hormones Dispute</i>, WT/DS320/AB/R,WT/DS321/AB/R, adopted 14 November 2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; De facto; Scientific evidence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009172046209259752,"gpt":0.2687030786292369,"spread":0.2595310324199771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001721255,0.0004218447,0.0007853865,0.0003273875,0.0005939148,0.0001852255,0.0003041237,0.0001320582,0.00009861538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009594606,0.0003311903,0.00009317536,0.002886343,0.0006724991,0.000475455,0.00007217292,0.0004814533,0.000003210902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000897672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002311633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01190344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3662171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959834,0.0006158927,0.001313601,0.0006422154,0.0009559924,0.0004889143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969535,0.0009933194,0.0009375507,0.0006122402,0.0002863662,0.0002169503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004771117,0.002647628,0.1684683,0.00721377,0.0005191224,0.0006149526,0.02308241,0.000357472,0.03505104,0.5324382,0.1932338,0.03589626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001501588,0.00008415474,0.5952938,0.00331424,0.0005676827,0.00009486434,0.0009123604,0.0003313419,0.0006676851,0.002217591,0.3940799,0.0009348135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7596836,0.02735274,0.00008258757,0.1998736,0.001172444,0.006859376,0.0001499802,0.0002546512,0.004571069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778498,0.01941315,0.0001892713,0.001073293,0.0001276468,0.00005437918,0.0005593335,0.00005107786,0.0006820362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5302206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999914,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078188506","doi":"10.1017/s1474745608003972","title":"The US–Canada softwood lumber dispute and the WTO definition of subsidy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"U.S. Department of Commerce","keywords":"Stumpage; Subsidy; Softwood; Business; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); International trade; Economics; Finance; Agricultural economics; Market economy; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05703117780015599,"gpt":0.1925450293288671,"spread":0.1355138515287111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004215228,0.0001293902,0.0004980285,0.00002247094,0.0002099962,0.00002015656,0.0002187451,0.0000226897,0.00006372176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005574845,0.0000875198,0.0001414773,0.0001925971,0.0001929032,0.00008242612,0.00003040151,0.0001267893,0.0000345478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004632637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003401041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009360771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05941322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988672,0.00002947792,0.0006594908,0.0001988413,0.0000339461,0.0002110339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991101,0.0001796322,0.0003218689,0.0003259812,0.000006684393,0.00005570847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001238131,0.00002681271,0.02826093,0.0004150139,0.00009050817,0.00000352268,0.00004100614,0.000003462237,1.240969e-7,0.9494957,0.01976437,0.001886175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007024278,0.000009784333,0.06439078,0.0002160752,0.00003429591,0.0000412367,0.000006637181,0.00004363399,0.000003379802,0.01624717,0.9181355,0.000169133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06485414,0.8255746,0.0000223021,0.02874372,0.0004760997,0.0007300509,0.0001527634,0.00001960391,0.07942675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6051341,0.3920633,0.00006505385,0.002411491,0.00004167432,0.00002750124,0.000006836613,0.0000109352,0.0002390925],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124634965","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000026","title":"‘The wide and the narrow gate’: Benchmarking in the SCM Agreement after the<i>Canada–Renewable Energy/FIT</i>Ruling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Subsidy; European court of justice; Status quo; Normalization (sociology); Ethos; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; European union; Economics; European Union law; Sociology; Marketing; International trade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02206361008178235,"gpt":0.2202621401772246,"spread":0.1981985300954422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001765875,0.0001535643,0.0001720923,0.0000343885,0.0003300325,0.0003574694,0.000429382,0.00001198668,0.0000978981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008604194,0.00006414868,0.00007130821,0.0003767115,0.000118164,0.0002764604,0.0000724709,0.0001411566,0.00001372974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004983876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006078004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03609839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3630154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986673,0.0001012105,0.000371823,0.0001640979,0.0004757334,0.0002198633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992838,0.0002189303,0.0001836052,0.0002572796,0.00004257767,0.0000138283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007070317,0.0000449469,0.001187159,0.0004458554,0.00006311417,0.00001755868,0.0001706107,0.0002652371,0.000001775352,0.5165082,0.4759865,0.005238325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003373113,0.000002159176,0.000573496,0.0005892033,0.00005524365,0.000003380954,0.00007198765,0.001676558,0.000002571433,0.003461476,0.993129,0.00009757939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001051772,0.2722033,0.00002828933,0.4955048,0.0008722256,0.001242053,0.000001822243,0.00002795038,0.2290678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.667421,0.006478874,0.00002525401,0.3232279,0.0007134308,0.0002559401,0.00001150202,0.00001414616,0.001851946],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6663692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9703203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593397345","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000210","title":"A Network Anatomy of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Unobservable; China; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Globalization; Business; Economic system; Law and economics; Political science; Market economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Finance; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02454528115608454,"gpt":0.2780979417230577,"spread":0.2535526605669731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002576868,0.000193744,0.0005207853,0.00007568848,0.0003066647,0.0001983208,0.0005316716,0.00001672112,0.0006649841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001781707,0.0001337119,0.0001730949,0.0002181319,0.00008539239,0.000635807,0.0001356069,0.0001024607,0.0001423926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008333518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001413522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000789665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009218413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989559,0.00001064999,0.0003964301,0.0002202329,0.0001808105,0.0002359463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986117,0.00002106696,0.0006558967,0.000655434,0.00003971649,0.00001622602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000964957,0.000444157,0.3651462,0.03216749,0.0002634137,0.0001733066,0.00005751625,0.00001453884,0.00002627531,0.3507417,0.1459991,0.1048699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003177914,0.000004218929,0.1161324,0.003730398,0.0001101636,0.000001152514,4.954581e-7,0.00002685223,0.000001439125,0.05990951,0.8195331,0.0002324514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2781695,0.3586137,0.0001469476,0.03491616,0.003180591,0.004378874,0.00002538962,0.0006443755,0.3199245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988909,0.005990215,0.00006612518,0.002632211,0.0008680833,0.00002083076,0.00001760993,0.00002562356,0.001470317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7107395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.728111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124860597","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000725","title":"<i>EC–Seal Products</i>: The Tension between Public Morals and International Trade Agreements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Seal (emblem); International trade; Free trade; Liberalization; Indigenous; Business; Political science; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07550056071203612,"gpt":0.3289097855616669,"spread":0.2534092248496308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110582,0.0001687834,0.0002891894,0.00008451161,0.0004200321,0.0001233745,0.0005534448,0.00003790019,0.0005989753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004595139,0.00009643629,0.00006718762,0.00101039,0.000435319,0.0004899049,0.00007371011,0.0001316417,0.00006747508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009183169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001167498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001998459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002258325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978474,0.000415635,0.0004167898,0.0003762292,0.0005914695,0.0003524502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990711,0.0002132563,0.0001928052,0.0003143261,0.00003545047,0.0001730762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038413,0.0001282273,0.04681334,0.000472339,0.0001816107,0.000006808903,0.0008122374,4.246215e-8,0.0006561663,0.4941921,0.1563979,0.3003354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000199068,0.000006733522,0.0379178,0.0007648022,0.00006539169,0.000002631969,0.00001999089,1.361201e-7,0.00006605618,0.0002658446,0.9605489,0.0001426594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005255024,0.02210347,0.00001154,0.9692738,0.0003663381,0.0008495142,0.0000224459,0.0001067276,0.006740679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319628,0.0592004,0.0001589027,0.004502011,0.0007508486,0.00002779512,0.00001545638,0.00002530882,0.00335641],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.655836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977486763","doi":"10.1017/s1474745619000351","title":"NAFTA 2.0: The Greenest Trade Agreement Ever?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade agreement; International trade; Agreement; Precautionary principle; Political science; Settlement (finance); Business; Free trade; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09721664171755458,"gpt":0.2620218961341397,"spread":0.1648052544165852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007368221,0.0002205294,0.0006628822,0.0001035999,0.00009482123,0.00005169911,0.0004630696,0.00004554453,0.00454466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002230368,0.0001889944,0.000301431,0.0003534339,0.00004298496,0.0001505953,0.00006367769,0.0002089186,0.007023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001184919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001160605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009542282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002157773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983274,0.00002466582,0.0007962496,0.0004089811,0.00003700616,0.0004056984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987345,0.00008695129,0.0003546664,0.0007274507,0.000002752493,0.00009366465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001332327,0.0002317244,0.0448577,0.005378472,0.0002539977,0.000007225314,0.0005637985,0.00002637006,0.00000594323,0.8258664,0.09539267,0.02740234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002498095,0.00002082415,0.01726176,0.0005257035,0.0000226373,0.00001010768,0.00001300732,0.000127616,0.000005396794,0.002715033,0.9787817,0.0002664093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01197894,0.6230298,0.00001923046,0.1557961,0.00145687,0.002046967,0.0003653718,0.00007951615,0.2052272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4763241,0.4714398,0.0001547322,0.04148256,0.0006197046,0.0001982531,0.00008831965,0.00008670447,0.009605897],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.883389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123850535","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000051","title":"<i>EC–Seal Products</i>: Seals and Sensibilities (TBT Aspects of the Panel and Appellate Body Reports)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Seal (emblem); European union; Interpretation (philosophy); International trade; Technical barriers to trade; Panel discussion; Product (mathematics); Business; Political science; Law; Advertising; Trade barrier; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05078805809042559,"gpt":0.2896381989919127,"spread":0.2388501409014871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001589765,0.0001544821,0.0004209213,0.00004371891,0.0002006218,0.00005269938,0.0001452472,0.00003701381,0.0000481121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007326993,0.0001125947,0.00004997842,0.001016426,0.0006354334,0.0001702092,0.00007033288,0.0001440391,0.000004967167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004174195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003193125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001722864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007895984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979655,0.0004428788,0.0004871188,0.000362285,0.0004872981,0.0002549257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988664,0.0001058092,0.0003026199,0.0004367998,0.0001028506,0.0001855423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001023543,0.0001710916,0.02564637,0.007401205,0.0001246044,0.00006774451,0.01076579,0.000002820105,0.000669722,0.9037044,0.04338061,0.008055409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001429742,0.00001392002,0.009638919,0.001514734,0.0001332298,0.00006519778,0.0002869236,7.399308e-7,0.0007100636,0.002223488,0.9850802,0.0001895498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02960886,0.4190086,0.000001740216,0.4313053,0.0009385306,0.003577615,0.00001750709,0.0002243618,0.1153175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649149,0.03097791,0.0001006392,0.0009793765,0.0001625521,0.000006182106,0.00000244376,0.00002059477,0.002835406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.459148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309328903","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000057","title":"Mapping the Scope of Dispute Settlement in Regional Trade Agreements: Implications for the Multilateral Governance of Trade","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Burman University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Settlement (finance); Corporate governance; Centrality; International trade; Typology; Regional trade; Political science; Business; Free trade; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1355680665669329,"gpt":0.2730057580859061,"spread":0.1374376915189732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005987749,0.0001554072,0.0005183019,0.00005367613,0.0000635805,0.0000108111,0.0005170388,0.00003051155,0.00007784799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003604891,0.00009587563,0.0002842639,0.0003197082,0.0001063449,0.0001377955,0.00003172937,0.00008174901,0.00001099751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001079552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002059964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003579605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001386836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982264,0.00002086508,0.001159464,0.0002869599,0.00003645986,0.0002698714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985267,0.0002379807,0.0007035618,0.0004887124,0.000004690618,0.00003834572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002652293,0.0003028905,0.03772686,0.00201372,0.0002934739,3.895229e-7,0.0003130922,0.00005310874,0.0001518574,0.7895006,0.02989301,0.1397245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005471668,0.00001847872,0.3743527,0.001254495,0.00001826543,0.000001944009,0.000008544366,0.00004130336,0.00003966328,0.003591263,0.620004,0.0001221544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003624984,0.5543905,0.00134273,0.4318302,0.0003429919,0.00304195,0.002942579,0.00001639517,0.002467667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6545628,0.3416468,0.0005777049,0.002666021,0.00007341436,0.0002967385,0.00001788642,0.00002149074,0.0001371672],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7859093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3909695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192412830","doi":"10.1017/s1474745621000239","title":"Labour Rights Protection and Its Enforcement under the USMCA: Insights from a Comparative Legal Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Political science; Law and economics; International trade; Economics; Business; International economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06255573799402164,"gpt":0.3461306657811071,"spread":0.2835749277870855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001750132,0.00009365857,0.0002522167,0.00004634501,0.0004600018,0.00009235,0.0001120843,0.00002182997,0.001042686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001149448,0.00006022937,0.0001131032,0.0009769596,0.00005805718,0.0001657272,0.00002089117,0.0001168303,0.00002722481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007732614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006765186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004519408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09317113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987493,0.000364189,0.0002088615,0.000197313,0.0003573132,0.0001230568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995983,0.00007939363,0.00008481496,0.0001048546,0.00007619949,0.00005649147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003010756,0.00002797636,0.00002047168,0.00003133644,0.0003625521,0.000003537303,0.0008293607,0.00001439088,0.00001890851,0.998309,0.0002159443,0.0001634662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000908904,0.000007904913,0.0025748,0.0002803948,0.0004318825,4.554784e-7,0.0001598985,0.00006090049,0.000174376,0.003191876,0.9929318,0.00009484009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1031863,0.495594,0.0006598477,0.09820879,0.0008977253,0.003125573,0.0001109353,0.0001587965,0.298058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808573,0.01042996,0.00002865112,0.001994119,0.0001362943,0.00005927648,0.00002429623,0.000002912901,0.006467205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278081846","doi":"10.1017/s147474560600142x","title":"United States – Final Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada (AB-2003-6, WT/DS257/AB/R)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Duty; Political science; Pulp and paper industry; Law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01759067891115106,"gpt":0.2674382720828339,"spread":0.2498475931716828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004173338,0.0002770048,0.0004425849,0.0001721966,0.0004388511,0.0001277927,0.0004012534,0.00004764517,0.001294635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002371126,0.000255751,0.00005126483,0.005189745,0.0001282146,0.0002176982,0.00002629168,0.0002113261,0.00005742966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005799512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009932114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6292056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9694352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971555,0.0004460101,0.0005499236,0.000468711,0.0008479267,0.0005318942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987271,0.000253464,0.0002255902,0.0003458965,0.0001848823,0.0002630472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005938002,0.0004194494,0.03210302,0.001118523,0.0001526599,0.0003623665,0.0019916,0.0004832778,0.00005613641,0.1024997,0.827011,0.03374282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002676465,0.00001944496,0.02226275,0.00118334,0.0001109153,0.000003023784,0.00006613097,0.00001834384,0.00007465313,0.0001422491,0.9754877,0.0003637641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06933288,0.09003635,0.001100662,0.7428989,0.001885712,0.01012586,0.0009163661,0.001626214,0.08207707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468095,0.01049179,0.006091684,0.017782,0.000876684,0.0001518809,0.001151233,0.0001584386,0.01648684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8774766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726456532","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000155","title":"Firms’ Integration into Value Chains and Compliance with Adverse WTO Panel Rulings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Politics; Business; Control (management); Variation (astronomy); Panel data; Law and economics; International economics; Economics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07154852034664955,"gpt":0.341566791157992,"spread":0.2700182708113425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005005958,0.0001693305,0.0003300278,0.00004854627,0.001222066,0.0001498875,0.0004177286,0.00003806065,0.0001797596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000243288,0.0001401332,0.00005048092,0.0003555955,0.0005274974,0.0005024883,0.00003910623,0.0001790636,0.00005989991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008458445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000994133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006816619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007090582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987161,0.000136776,0.0002591485,0.0003190509,0.0003247751,0.0002441044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989879,0.00006472849,0.000284659,0.0004387273,0.00005110231,0.0001728802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008966798,0.00009160163,0.008225046,0.00166157,0.00005119224,0.00002339633,0.006322543,0.000003006819,0.00005394227,0.8936492,0.003570223,0.08633937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003723511,0.00002647837,0.04105827,0.007289066,0.000127635,0.000006822246,0.0002071145,0.00004682817,0.00005181607,0.0007222008,0.9497237,0.0003676891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006450546,0.1162344,0.001660907,0.7610292,0.0009866095,0.00469811,0.00002260869,0.0007052408,0.1082123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485843,0.04248251,0.002774288,0.002471467,0.0001880823,0.00003020586,0.00001013558,0.00002820143,0.003430884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9461535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.939927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612543568","doi":"10.1017/s1474745617000246","title":"The Treatment of Chinese SOEs in China's WTO Protocol of Accession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Accession; China; Economic reform; State (computer science); Business; World trade; International trade; Point (geometry); State owned; Political science; Economics; Market economy; European union; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07827721028724036,"gpt":0.3235017335491103,"spread":0.24522452326187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003339702,0.0001396175,0.0006705778,0.00006530597,0.0001108443,0.00003666469,0.0004571192,0.00003007169,0.00009289652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004973035,0.00009273607,0.0002109674,0.0001172792,0.00007610377,0.0001639452,0.00002971123,0.00005583783,0.00002926343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005878482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001347541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002222523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004242775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987392,0.00001497835,0.0008509955,0.0002035569,0.00001879594,0.0001724776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983504,0.00003328673,0.0008880417,0.0006848875,0.000004228442,0.000039118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004890368,0.0007109771,0.7818086,0.002848136,0.00007739656,0.000003795412,0.0001686551,0.00001059737,0.00000541485,0.08419135,0.0006134644,0.1295127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006407704,0.0000843946,0.5297225,0.0006645719,0.000006106385,8.064108e-7,0.000001883449,0.00004727114,0.00004192921,0.008777047,0.4599084,0.0001043705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.244336,0.3693389,0.00001416955,0.03095202,0.001026014,0.1431273,0.0003211144,0.00004731044,0.2108371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8320596,0.1548668,0.0001248423,0.00008083243,0.00006545748,0.01230728,0.000003875953,0.00001843543,0.0004728231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5877236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3781667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599639032","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000616","title":"The ‘Development’ Discourse in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Odds; Developing country; International trade; Economics; Political science; Differential treatment; International economics; Law and economics; Law; Economic growth; Legislature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04575689362627034,"gpt":0.3855116420501675,"spread":0.3397547484238971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001285,0.0001615585,0.0002878238,0.00005109382,0.002396926,0.0003685397,0.001014846,0.00003688968,0.0001957611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002856299,0.0001199831,0.00008376805,0.0003740187,0.0004792716,0.0004182347,0.00006100298,0.0002498728,0.00007162614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001315127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001910981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001116315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03019711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981341,0.0002585199,0.0004701354,0.0002643391,0.000400027,0.0004729032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989282,0.0001449627,0.0002687879,0.0005283792,0.000009335238,0.0001202826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006412838,0.0001561475,0.03691667,0.0005833,0.0000528565,0.00004253218,0.009255333,0.000002398274,0.00001858577,0.610433,0.008531002,0.3340017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001554023,0.000001413494,0.1044786,0.001503746,0.00001633534,8.510507e-7,0.00008257566,0.000002462492,0.00001983991,0.0001154682,0.8934642,0.0001590859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002586886,0.06897569,0.00001201731,0.7876129,0.001317172,0.002051213,0.000004548085,0.0002220327,0.1372175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734382,0.02072651,0.0003825321,0.001049968,0.000194428,0.00004267146,0.000003316828,0.000026796,0.004135592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544206638","doi":"","title":"Canada Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exportation; Business; Milk products; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Commerce; Food science; Economics; Environmental science; Chemistry; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02052028786518846,"gpt":0.2121635997888588,"spread":0.1916433119236704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003230314,0.00005746708,0.0001626151,0.000002159315,0.00006938694,0.000005806281,0.00008416597,0.000008452263,0.000007452737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005938022,0.00001310018,0.00004040065,0.0002047745,0.00004749498,0.00003316577,0.000007121505,0.00004468317,1.654363e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001203881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003136897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1297364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5179299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994878,0.00004923399,0.0002365492,0.00008087444,0.00007809668,0.00006748061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995739,0.0001204296,0.0002328801,0.00003433894,0.00002160205,0.00001684442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006150423,0.0001098292,0.008330831,0.003426282,0.0001916908,0.000002477884,0.001799905,0.0001207427,0.04315748,0.0880293,0.0143792,0.8403907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004101837,0.00006103944,0.8664144,0.00145676,0.0001531496,0.00001452859,0.0003837963,0.00000288334,0.007630541,0.001194569,0.1220739,0.0002042987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8876784,0.06120976,8.938167e-8,0.05022504,0.00004166823,0.0005030864,0.00001099479,0.00000386094,0.0003270736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864696,0.01280945,0.000009693256,0.0006078249,0.00006113124,0.000009314268,0.00001094534,3.041157e-7,0.00002175324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8580835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8760588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267296807","doi":"10.1017/s1474745605001308","title":"United States – Preliminary Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada: What is a Subsidy?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stumpage; Softwood; Subsidy; Agricultural economics; Economics; Pulp and paper industry; Business; Engineering; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01301141887617624,"gpt":0.2428156819854117,"spread":0.2298042631092355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001298619,0.0001793505,0.0002103514,0.00006226282,0.00007554483,0.00005534607,0.000238511,0.00001631192,0.005715387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001009642,0.0001449316,0.00003920839,0.0008500148,0.00004051908,0.0003587745,0.00006982946,0.00009237231,0.0005276679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002958785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002527811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1917248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6777897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987704,0.00007166708,0.0002361806,0.0003015795,0.0003353657,0.0002847852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993861,0.00006628775,0.00007914445,0.0003179776,0.000003694639,0.000146788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005054323,0.00009162664,0.008003735,0.0004407445,0.00004068307,0.00005425236,0.0008262976,0.000542714,0.00000729596,0.00008115937,0.6527038,0.3371571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001824834,0.0000540897,0.02671969,0.001369002,0.00008028041,0.000002979987,0.00001393604,0.0005009691,0.00004456741,0.00002235824,0.9707841,0.0002255534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4482517,0.1087235,0.00006695354,0.4071302,0.0002800853,0.005347405,0.0001389341,0.0002996327,0.0297616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6941841,0.1146897,0.00559249,0.1367999,0.0003203663,0.0003767888,0.0006051558,0.0001417603,0.0472897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4860649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139322096","doi":"10.1017/s1474745604001740","title":"<i>Canada – Dairy</i> Canada – Measures Affecting the Importation of Dairy Products and the Exportation of Milk","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exportation; Subsidy; International trade; Business; World trade; Agreement on Agriculture; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Political science; Economics; Geography; Law; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03453327240237446,"gpt":0.2002301801942717,"spread":0.1656969077918972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007796385,0.0001158801,0.0004684849,0.00002765658,0.00007480896,0.00001060646,0.0001663407,0.00001616014,0.000009717305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001617915,0.00008417993,0.00006343779,0.000296559,0.00006891057,0.00008458398,0.00001185155,0.00009898504,7.313395e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001025881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003776971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8188847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9610968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998778,0.00002656722,0.0007880923,0.0002008321,0.00006067027,0.0001457959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988503,0.00009577366,0.0007256073,0.0002748748,0.00002001109,0.00003336141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008222636,0.0001498675,0.05875332,0.01244773,0.0006507786,0.00001216279,0.001584789,0.002031572,0.00007056076,0.8551193,0.04508788,0.02400976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003352723,0.00005984802,0.2326107,0.002686833,0.0002796097,0.00003568455,0.000481205,0.00006998705,0.002058034,0.01444661,0.7431844,0.0007344068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2370514,0.6981495,0.00003884217,0.05403446,0.0007965955,0.001900424,0.0002264183,0.00001381718,0.00778857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725122,0.02585148,0.00008143386,0.001449907,0.00003611292,0.00001783747,0.00001222349,0.000009601077,0.00002923684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8406727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3432758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266883631","doi":"10.1017/s1474745603001125","title":"US – Export Restraints: United States – Measures Treating Export Restraints as Subsidies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Plaintiff; International trade; Duty; Legislation; Principal (computer security); Consistency (knowledge bases); Business; World trade; International trade law; Political science; Law; International economics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04373032196484535,"gpt":0.3213137175900134,"spread":0.2775833956251681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002296623,0.0004205874,0.0007208614,0.00032368,0.000824285,0.0001602991,0.0005069486,0.0001015115,0.003012373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002143238,0.0004042716,0.0002176027,0.003751538,0.000596097,0.0004029283,0.00002481719,0.000373589,0.0002284285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002413435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005329484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005427208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002578343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952555,0.001187558,0.001002362,0.0006347598,0.001093521,0.0008263572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980537,0.0003365635,0.0004259808,0.000575533,0.0001651852,0.0004429944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001795196,0.0005328318,0.03494091,0.002010869,0.0003688391,0.0004978811,0.01166622,0.00003234374,0.0001307925,0.8715658,0.05400912,0.02422648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002710221,0.0000253355,0.007262422,0.002174638,0.0001546858,0.00002666831,0.001122688,8.040811e-7,0.0002131288,0.001139044,0.9871387,0.0004708436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03029725,0.20297,0.00008801205,0.1199733,0.001461125,0.005142316,0.00007946765,0.002095248,0.6378933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8159208,0.1656344,0.001222829,0.005790832,0.0002634294,0.0001155652,0.0001682838,0.0001258212,0.010758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197767697","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000282","title":"Too much Zeal on Seals? Animal Welfare, Public Morals, and Consumer Ethics at the Bar of the WTO","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Public policy; Law and economics; Welfare; Product (mathematics); Political science; Public economics; Law; Economics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1261144162577735,"gpt":0.3548256356347773,"spread":0.2287112193770038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002216568,0.0001679698,0.0003473815,0.00004024389,0.000714178,0.00008134695,0.0005341225,0.00008035579,0.0006360082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001082955,0.00009632295,0.0001029752,0.001183781,0.0009739388,0.0001615164,0.0001191308,0.0004524995,0.00005593005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001195695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002744125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001706171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003381515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968966,0.001316037,0.0003807386,0.0002592377,0.0008407287,0.0003066138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998606,0.0003952331,0.0002246802,0.0004497669,0.0001100286,0.0002143203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005341245,0.00005725108,0.006385359,0.0003397694,0.00003389533,0.000001646913,0.001484409,4.672909e-7,0.00001000621,0.9100358,0.0791939,0.00245218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001586535,0.00001584295,0.01231206,0.0003721353,0.00007412493,0.000003658185,0.0001796333,8.457764e-7,0.00004833957,0.000182506,0.9865341,0.0001180738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004369166,0.07304716,3.952757e-7,0.8961409,0.0002330163,0.0008190093,0.00001717598,0.0000514211,0.0253218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630963,0.02587145,0.00003196828,0.007887895,0.00009598795,0.00001729174,0.000004532394,0.00002306864,0.002971477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9587272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6963844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301036686","doi":"10.1017/s1474745615000464","title":"Nature and Enforceability of WTO-plus SPS and TBT Provisions in Canada's PTAs: From<i>NAFTA</i>to<i>CETA</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technical barriers to trade; International trade; Enforcement; Phytosanitary certification; Customs union; Business; Harmonization; International economics; Conformity assessment; European union; Trade barrier; Free trade; World trade; International trade law; Economics; Political science; Law; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01904689184486959,"gpt":0.290531257176712,"spread":0.2714843653318424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007824438,0.0001712963,0.000552846,0.00007817786,0.00009895206,0.00003118401,0.0002587774,0.00006626712,0.0001034092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005583125,0.000156267,0.00003524108,0.001381835,0.0001739982,0.0001384486,0.00006624745,0.0003178983,0.000003877297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003773865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001725691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5169741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9783611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980301,0.0003151297,0.0004888237,0.0003678531,0.0005037987,0.0002942511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988541,0.0002048509,0.0001383566,0.0002988079,0.00006172314,0.00044216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007724894,0.0003961347,0.3666629,0.005837672,0.0001647057,0.0000938068,0.0176698,0.00003770303,0.0001489607,0.3378718,0.07615923,0.1948801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003867999,0.00001549893,0.03704678,0.001649268,0.0000628339,0.000001718568,0.000378753,0.000007693651,0.00003620303,0.0004954388,0.9596759,0.0002431382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09211345,0.5797869,0.00001940046,0.2814436,0.0009243902,0.005849163,0.0002628382,0.0001543811,0.0394459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821174,0.01373313,0.0005226145,0.00324953,0.00006601356,0.00001825303,0.00001520361,0.00001721289,0.0002606156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.890004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6372385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220889505","doi":"10.1017/s1474745622000076","title":"Counterfactuals and Contingency in WTO Dispute Settlement History","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Dispute resolution; Settlement (finance); Scholarship; Law and economics; Hindsight bias; Law; Politics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02868164063325946,"gpt":0.2903954814127165,"spread":0.2617138407794571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001128003,0.0001101028,0.0002807355,0.000101265,0.0002609728,0.00001674238,0.0002277465,0.00001243679,0.009251943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006801058,0.0001209738,0.00004400038,0.0006509064,0.0001194725,0.0001515168,0.00007036711,0.0001956404,0.00002045633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005730903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001561635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001719435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002036297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982518,0.0004643678,0.0003633892,0.0002545019,0.0004071106,0.0002588507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999512,0.00009514931,0.0001289658,0.0001602302,0.00001056099,0.00009311899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006074508,0.0002742011,0.01900796,0.001358667,0.00004352307,0.00004378607,0.01301502,0.000005886198,0.00004735417,0.6554601,0.2838597,0.02687778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001480573,0.000008641176,0.005388242,0.0002774395,0.00002636744,0.000001651559,0.0001690779,0.000001490602,0.000001701959,0.00006257594,0.9937794,0.000135317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001439056,0.7350143,0.000008511324,0.191929,0.000965737,0.001828698,0.00004742923,0.000162563,0.06860466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8668432,0.1151508,0.0001412417,0.0103249,0.0001145759,0.0001728121,0.00002655006,0.00003429237,0.007191642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8654041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007375031","doi":"10.1017/s1474745611000103","title":"Mutually agreed solutions under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: An Analytical Framework after the<i>Softwood Lumber</i>Arbitration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Arbitration; Enforcement; Settlement (finance); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; International trade law; Economics; Computer science; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1389354513894192,"gpt":0.3328775943024434,"spread":0.1939421429130242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001414614,0.0002503111,0.0003149672,0.00006491948,0.001263896,0.0001807712,0.0006618461,0.00008526272,0.003109208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001180552,0.0001594118,0.0002054083,0.00174275,0.0007296075,0.0003953146,0.00006377657,0.0004623918,0.0001143453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003184813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001915421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001231048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01209194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968731,0.0008802752,0.0005472639,0.0003966161,0.0007219122,0.0005808382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985341,0.000323215,0.0001858845,0.0006685127,0.0000474908,0.0002408429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000528521,0.0001222075,0.0006037495,0.00005984251,0.00006883537,0.000003210184,0.003571111,0.000002431142,9.219756e-7,0.9911643,0.004094914,0.0003031889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003811835,0.00008752582,0.05353717,0.00211622,0.001486086,0.00001491724,0.003975729,0.0000856211,0.000009248584,0.08304082,0.854342,0.0009234681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005647498,0.04593297,0.04167952,0.7967622,0.001720603,0.005067376,0.00007960673,0.0007340905,0.1074589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974339,0.007516976,0.0007015131,0.01609948,0.000438983,0.0001049883,0.00002302959,0.00004151421,0.0007345221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9737743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}