{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":34,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"2befbcab4435","filters":{"venue":"Written Communication"}},"results":[{"id":"W1974364203","doi":"10.1177/0741088303262846","title":"Textual Borrowing in Second-Language Writing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":320,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Second language writing; Affect (linguistics); Linguistics; Acknowledgement; Psychology; Composition (language); English for academic purposes; First language; Second language; Computer science; Mathematics education","authors":[{"name":"Ling Shi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01664593052061106,"gpt":0.3215003104826403,"spread":0.3048543799620292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002016415,0.0003930892,0.000448455,0.001168409,0.0006929005,0.002564079,0.000417389,0.0004664199,0.002772438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04423215,0.0003608375,0.0002562074,0.0008315013,0.000832204,0.001590066,0.00195806,0.0006784202,0.0005352451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004317322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004606537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004136697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005947426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996786,0.001566636,0.0002437294,0.000318647,0.0009360784,0.0001488968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567958,0.02703058,0.01069483,0.001974985,0.002294762,0.001209035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001980891,0.001204335,0.5322849,0.000798966,0.0002023677,0.00239084,0.09739883,0.00067816,0.1013781,0.001913855,0.001055317,0.2587135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000137889,0.001536844,0.9336115,0.0002397581,0.0001456096,0.005121963,0.02407897,0.00240672,0.02293811,0.003568624,0.006097242,0.0001169446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996573,0.0001898009,0.0005390084,0.00005491644,0.000007599851,0.00001127653,0.00001858642,0.00002281272,0.002582927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998243,0.0001382157,0.0005747852,0.00003393957,0.0000129297,0.00001403391,0.00005128149,0.00002966443,0.0009021469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002772438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01066393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904689585","doi":"10.1177/0741088318804821","title":"Linguistic Injustice in the Writing of Research Articles in English as a Second Language: Data From Taiwanese and Mexican Researchers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Second language writing; Psychology; Injustice; Linguistics; Language barrier; Sociology; Second language; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"David I. Hanauer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Cheryl L. Sheridan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Karen Englander","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1744184311501657,"gpt":0.4272289592970083,"spread":0.2528105281468426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007250936,0.0003149312,0.0003973593,0.003022387,0.001703562,0.002767344,0.000474285,0.0006543323,0.001205745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05186458,0.0003876925,0.0004291215,0.001693581,0.001430353,0.001516736,0.003360312,0.0009342177,0.0002781558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008253814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001307367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006027877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009296173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942227,0.002941525,0.00107067,0.000309166,0.001107979,0.000347932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9155686,0.02844079,0.04338778,0.003146672,0.0064406,0.003015524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001802312,0.000185362,0.7157435,0.0002119879,0.00008568279,0.000714315,0.2678888,0.00003160543,0.001536387,0.0001067484,0.0002945277,0.01302089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002282177,0.0002864432,0.6490861,0.0002145164,0.00005270739,0.001028187,0.346035,0.0001679358,0.0005775332,0.0001172098,0.002373325,0.00003819275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994454,0.0001310847,0.00002816743,0.00008859543,0.000002603108,0.000006729981,0.00001850899,9.206626e-7,0.0002780203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990025,0.0003265061,0.0001406805,0.0001161781,0.00001390863,0.00003775302,0.0000738506,0.00000307582,0.0002856329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.992749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03834707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056003629","doi":"10.1177/0741088311419630","title":"The Writing’s on the Board","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Rhetorical question; Discipline; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Rhetoric; Composition (language); Linguistics; Sociology; Psychology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Natasha Artemeva","is_ca":true},{"name":"Janna Fox","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2759961584113557,"gpt":0.426895193251216,"spread":0.1508990348398603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001269566,0.0003995392,0.0002329728,0.0008364425,0.003104659,0.004563795,0.0004010217,0.000855634,0.04521447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01283824,0.0001632329,0.0002543869,0.0008438455,0.002248402,0.002666469,0.002313686,0.001760217,0.01215036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001123913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001660293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001154617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001647621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997501,0.0009346158,0.0001580564,0.000345557,0.0008117761,0.0002489861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944329,0.00175679,0.0006534125,0.0008852291,0.001447405,0.0008242214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002382781,0.0001716813,0.007471716,0.0003734578,0.00002872094,0.001269392,0.113806,0.0002099857,0.009000681,0.1691653,0.2462727,0.4519922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009750786,0.00005992148,0.002478205,0.000102596,0.000005253061,0.0004879037,0.01394221,0.00006594891,0.001218389,0.005002185,0.9766158,0.00001193278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08866723,0.001544436,0.01000465,0.01090013,0.00818334,0.0001517512,0.000382996,0.0004573005,0.8797081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5626333,0.001114089,0.006963012,0.002972313,0.00138024,0.0001429264,0.0005096075,0.0006572434,0.4236272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04521447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1512575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987197647","doi":"10.1177/0741088305280350","title":"Commitments to Academic Biliteracy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Sociology; Academic writing; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Discipline; English for academic purposes; Field (mathematics); Documentation; Pedagogy; Negotiation; Translanguaging; Linguistics; Psychology; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Guillaume Gentil","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04132560785414448,"gpt":0.3254798028674687,"spread":0.2841541950133242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006280827,0.0003733373,0.0003607955,0.002090259,0.02119496,0.009511119,0.001665663,0.001157849,0.003921881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02218779,0.000282623,0.0002250893,0.001424314,0.02431696,0.003070367,0.0110127,0.003120324,0.0003235296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01997088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02119648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1205379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.145129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915633,0.003858936,0.0002723143,0.0005390873,0.001747636,0.002018712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811258,0.00539868,0.002361507,0.001202737,0.0042727,0.005638501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007980811,0.00005667544,0.02571402,0.00005650651,0.000007692639,0.001126133,0.8928339,0.0001607489,0.001502697,0.05703013,0.0008972849,0.02053438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126424,0.00007075449,0.02229273,0.0001077002,0.00001207654,0.0006609447,0.9020265,0.0004383493,0.0009924888,0.01758181,0.05574625,0.00005761726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435611,0.0002833323,0.001080058,0.002849722,0.00002431756,0.0000232154,0.00001758904,0.00003914072,0.05212164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981719,0.00003709116,0.000102296,0.00005414626,0.00000228685,0.000004587646,0.000004197192,0.000006338049,0.00161706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1205379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2396727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996477132","doi":"10.1177/0741088310371635","title":"Undergraduate Writing Assignments: An Analysis of Syllabi at One Canadian College","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabus; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Higher education; Task (project management); Academic writing; Psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Roger Graves","is_ca":true},{"name":"Theresa Hyland","is_ca":false},{"name":"Boba Samuels","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03217846521966579,"gpt":0.3400945437894142,"spread":0.3079160785697485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001851715,0.0003466083,0.000279731,0.007493525,0.003223037,0.001354932,0.0005976873,0.0002571035,0.00169119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02025422,0.0002413759,0.0001906113,0.006624245,0.0007710853,0.0003160977,0.001043775,0.0004186003,0.0004448985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006787115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01198891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4844484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7001063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99696,0.0003189514,0.0001882463,0.0002914949,0.001708801,0.0005324847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784333,0.003722897,0.002749569,0.0005161067,0.01138905,0.003189171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003908891,0.0003860544,0.6916221,0.0002450222,0.00003330124,0.0007819294,0.05479982,0.0003174714,0.01063873,0.0005373938,0.002924063,0.2373232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004335132,0.00007394904,0.9859586,0.00002624987,0.000007391184,0.0001020289,0.007100414,0.0004246854,0.001268726,0.00005470755,0.004954615,0.00002428022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963057,0.00007719718,0.0002697043,0.00004894892,0.000008505333,0.00009287864,0.0004212201,0.00002428688,0.002751575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936825,0.0001683048,0.001427342,0.00003683141,0.000008053629,0.00005114394,0.001009578,0.00002127212,0.003594979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5155516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066179212","doi":"10.1177/0741088307305977","title":"Professional Editing Strategies Used by Six Editors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Excellence; GRASP; Computer science; Professional development; Class (philosophy); Process (computing); Action (physics); Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jocelyne Bisaillon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02549537641739615,"gpt":0.3635888497047357,"spread":0.3380934732873395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01096141,0.0006676519,0.0005553828,0.003056908,0.002898897,0.005267157,0.001502243,0.001683631,0.002858996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.127833,0.0005419189,0.000384764,0.001345054,0.001328382,0.001945338,0.002313916,0.001204775,0.00109372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001145201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001702518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008196884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001716598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845573,0.0075148,0.002013031,0.001927617,0.002864591,0.001122718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8925775,0.06162481,0.01423876,0.006015892,0.01725086,0.008292316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001082471,0.001074255,0.1384174,0.0008321421,0.0001298432,0.004112766,0.4097178,0.0008358907,0.02556353,0.002125241,0.003002062,0.4131066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003565461,0.003234772,0.3021575,0.0009882351,0.000428546,0.01325727,0.4559672,0.01644981,0.05836935,0.006450621,0.141309,0.001031123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895649,0.0002968579,0.003143484,0.000304349,0.00006572186,0.0001187845,0.00002802895,0.0002034192,0.006274497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852244,0.0002200424,0.007612511,0.00009796663,0.0000270769,0.00005765179,0.00005275235,0.00005772413,0.006649915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01096141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05797017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972352818","doi":"10.1177/0741088319861648","title":"Addressing the “Bias Gap”: A Research-Driven Argument for Critical Support of Plurilingual Scientists’ Research Writing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical reflection; Sociology; Second language writing; Argument (complex analysis); Scientific writing; Psychology; Pedagogy; Public relations; Political science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"James Corcoran","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5045019694949158,"gpt":0.5065723828596409,"spread":0.002070413364725132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3778141,0.001500951,0.001567913,0.007081288,0.02244173,0.02275824,0.00703243,0.01273813,0.003342732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.458813,0.00140912,0.001088065,0.003181668,0.1486382,0.04341041,0.03625268,0.01668476,0.0005782915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01541749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03043753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003411621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00203403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5029002,0.425476,0.01259458,0.01974212,0.02934047,0.009946608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3161058,0.5878859,0.03755337,0.03031564,0.02193243,0.006206748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001084327,0.00006421984,0.002689589,0.0003557222,0.00003615878,0.0003043101,0.588011,0.00008522737,0.0004837805,0.396109,0.001270058,0.0104826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000212632,0.0001329362,0.001544631,0.002069572,0.00007620051,0.0005532389,0.3808342,0.001134042,0.002981699,0.5414909,0.06888344,0.00008655078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.291484,0.00533296,0.1394756,0.4577903,0.002376748,0.0009443585,0.00005909828,0.0001655751,0.1023715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765056,0.0002773574,0.009179722,0.01206701,0.000302403,0.000537163,0.00001076701,0.000060274,0.001059723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6221859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.767266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106283982","doi":"10.1177/0741088309342362","title":"Internet Health and the 21st-Century Patient","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Rhetorical question; Scholarship; Subject (documents); Internet privacy; Health communication; Sociology; Public relations; Public health; Psychology; Health care; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Linguistics; Medicine; Law; Nursing","authors":[{"name":"Judy Z. Segal","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01681198985921451,"gpt":0.2517094510009346,"spread":0.2348974611417201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009387933,0.0003366665,0.0003121512,0.001566335,0.01003191,0.0172193,0.001042022,0.009561462,0.008146781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02115326,0.0002603495,0.0002434335,0.001395815,0.04253501,0.01859563,0.00972437,0.01045458,0.001591846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004811536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004584874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001869187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001740327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880697,0.009206585,0.0002704582,0.0004309734,0.00136404,0.0006582266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863935,0.009711049,0.001041862,0.0006185034,0.0007722951,0.00146284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002102321,0.00005003979,0.0006800322,0.00007535806,0.000003651845,0.0002709587,0.09817206,0.00004997484,0.0001062828,0.8398668,0.04502508,0.0156788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004104766,0.00006206393,0.0005255128,0.0005777613,0.000009040775,0.000911639,0.05669229,0.0002423833,0.0001964134,0.3363492,0.6043586,0.00003422903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02599836,0.01574426,0.002630139,0.6162309,0.001866868,0.00002608758,0.00004289845,0.000089087,0.3373714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8244286,0.01383157,0.002018937,0.1111351,0.004007115,0.00008929819,0.00005032843,0.0001160881,0.04432295],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0172193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0496487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113777155","doi":"10.1177/0741088313515164","title":"The Quotation Theory of Writing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Reading (process); Meaning (existential); Professional writing; Context (archaeology); Written language; Representation (politics); Relevance (law); Set (abstract data type); Rationality; Expression (computer science); Computer science; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics education; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David R. Olson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Keith Oatley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02505095857201333,"gpt":0.2994004169690591,"spread":0.2743494583970458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003122988,0.0007260864,0.0005745778,0.003644132,0.002740784,0.007300534,0.001189811,0.002338945,0.01434633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009918168,0.0003325795,0.000727844,0.002952993,0.01515921,0.01300707,0.00261134,0.00218561,0.003855307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002706846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001873814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00200155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001276642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948521,0.002924935,0.0003686473,0.0004755257,0.001106824,0.0002719199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946286,0.003268438,0.0004194547,0.0006609961,0.0008603783,0.0001620964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003620378,0.000001628971,0.00002164225,0.00004400322,0.000001531966,0.00002139333,0.0008919662,0.00005148684,0.0000327099,0.9933148,0.001220297,0.004394807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006625357,0.00001085591,0.0001162988,0.0001564635,0.000003973083,0.0001631189,0.0005902767,0.0004371183,0.0001728933,0.8596683,0.1386643,0.000009732601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005664809,0.01585356,0.1009225,0.009081963,0.002423724,0.00009037717,0.0002238041,0.0001785695,0.8655607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7196355,0.01942156,0.05627232,0.00461786,0.005481526,0.0004982922,0.0003835723,0.0002960903,0.1933932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01434633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04799324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414336906","doi":"10.1177/0741088316650178","title":"Idea Generation in Student Writing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Fluency; Variance (accounting); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Linguistics; Flexibility (engineering); Elaboration; Natural language generation; Second language writing; Academic writing; Creativity; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Social psychology; Natural language; Second language","authors":[{"name":"Scott A. Crossley","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kasia Müldner","is_ca":true},{"name":"Danielle S. McNamara","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05748258665459799,"gpt":0.3762826630400258,"spread":0.3188000763854278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004875422,0.0002962612,0.0002378871,0.001873699,0.000617592,0.003134916,0.0003345142,0.0005076743,0.001637416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05556412,0.0001941171,0.0003731624,0.00109371,0.001465877,0.001573176,0.001711962,0.0007984336,0.0002635691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006059784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004418685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003210442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003186997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955858,0.002513181,0.0002964157,0.0003913788,0.001040998,0.0001722316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.951358,0.03090479,0.01065758,0.002338347,0.003214612,0.001526618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005108828,0.0003936035,0.6967129,0.000462312,0.000180326,0.000634235,0.03639251,0.003118386,0.005785975,0.008264743,0.00119634,0.2463478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006682029,0.0008427965,0.9367372,0.000255115,0.00008168386,0.001404013,0.01133342,0.01100311,0.003330906,0.02743985,0.007401266,0.0001038542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897943,0.0006050107,0.004870116,0.0001823513,0.00002082899,0.00003973151,0.00004269492,0.00004182415,0.004402992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972972,0.0001533329,0.001986661,0.00002362516,0.00001533234,0.00002034879,0.00004902816,0.000008126092,0.0004463432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004875422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02578402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158064748","doi":"10.1177/0741088303260691","title":"Tasks, Ensembles, and Activity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Perspective (graphical); Activity theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Literacy; Field (mathematics); Task (project management); Computer science; Point (geometry); Cognitive science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Robert J. Bracewell","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stephen P. Witte","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08888060281973789,"gpt":0.4044313779397848,"spread":0.3155507751200469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001398452,0.0003615289,0.0002787343,0.002350608,0.001444448,0.003890685,0.0004685301,0.0007384694,0.001735159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006729329,0.0001522871,0.0003154414,0.001627086,0.005578383,0.005077177,0.003649727,0.0008420761,0.0003122262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006766336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007132014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001325866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001571736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979961,0.0009553867,0.0001708403,0.0003394735,0.0003386463,0.0001996273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952047,0.00253987,0.0008693422,0.0006755165,0.0002635731,0.0004470121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001917129,0.0001610831,0.0537039,0.000374664,0.00004435148,0.0002628946,0.04622737,0.006122659,0.002877745,0.6768816,0.001393511,0.2117586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002656683,0.0002836331,0.08129282,0.000284102,0.00003218651,0.0005929272,0.02197002,0.01068697,0.00168815,0.813994,0.06907582,0.00007287387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.678092,0.002959777,0.1507124,0.001686678,0.0001477725,0.00013254,0.0002328078,0.0002757988,0.1657602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791271,0.0003571749,0.0176744,0.00006216508,0.00005724616,0.00009726216,0.0001111135,0.00003284378,0.002480753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003890685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007395864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790826992","doi":"10.1177/0741088317748590","title":"Coding for Language Complexity: The Interplay Among Methodological Commitments, Tools, and Workflow in Writing Research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Workflow; Knowledge management; Data science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Cheryl Geisler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2972465483711375,"gpt":0.4600617848547799,"spread":0.1628152364836424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3482035,0.001714123,0.001851355,0.01228595,0.01558509,0.02897031,0.005840728,0.003008717,0.001998928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5959751,0.002289175,0.001477392,0.01503553,0.04488978,0.02930345,0.02158814,0.00815405,0.0006171738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01818968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04330096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007475672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006169448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4246362,0.471051,0.03502408,0.0126244,0.05247451,0.004189831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2696725,0.5910355,0.04202338,0.05460057,0.03885159,0.00381642],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001783813,0.00008108262,0.00860193,0.00138949,0.00008332356,0.0004055154,0.4307752,0.002130084,0.00335686,0.4403273,0.002804291,0.1098667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001068753,0.0001226668,0.004967358,0.004336417,0.00008416948,0.0008140045,0.130528,0.01259916,0.004692213,0.8022782,0.03907007,0.0004007643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09657835,0.001457671,0.8619019,0.02324056,0.0005267592,0.001788734,0.0001620518,0.0003910195,0.01395296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4654653,0.0009567801,0.5251057,0.001796642,0.0002331888,0.004228831,0.0001858024,0.0004096336,0.001618088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6517965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8037811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127580309","doi":"10.1177/0741088305282762","title":"Sixth-Grade Teachers’ Written Comments on Student Writing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Ideology; Style (visual arts); Psychology; Convention; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Pedagogy; Writing style; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Literature; Sociology; Politics; Social science; Art; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Shelley Stagg Peterson","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kerrie Kennedy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04858988157334892,"gpt":0.3815421062252652,"spread":0.3329522246519163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002884006,0.0003453299,0.0004521762,0.001157764,0.0009137783,0.0009337039,0.0003823424,0.0005068538,0.00337444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0482399,0.0002479283,0.000174108,0.0005838238,0.0006751383,0.0006416448,0.0009603644,0.0006225835,0.001243752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005900059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000447107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001565558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003670836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953138,0.002224822,0.0004083744,0.00035589,0.001379475,0.0003177316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9215885,0.05337791,0.01148021,0.001929815,0.009800551,0.001823027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00192057,0.0004478963,0.3282035,0.0007977316,0.00005545128,0.002561607,0.4369094,0.0003645821,0.04551809,0.0003487854,0.002871016,0.1800013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006565488,0.001510749,0.7425866,0.0005826385,0.00005388769,0.001269107,0.200786,0.001133276,0.028709,0.0003621409,0.02282093,0.0001200705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981523,0.00007746914,0.0001859792,0.00004882843,0.00001486119,0.00001116533,0.00005754087,0.00001456089,0.00143716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967158,0.0001522149,0.0004522798,0.00003395743,0.00001413763,0.0000305342,0.0001143937,0.00002028492,0.002466434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00337444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01525223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905046585","doi":"10.1177/0741088318804534","title":"Registered Reports: Genre Evolution and the Research Article","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Rhetorical question; Novelty; Sociology; Hybridity; Genre analysis; Phenomenon; Empirical research; Publishing; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Literature; Political science; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"Ashley Rose Mehlenbacher","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1020965790235753,"gpt":0.3569873170871209,"spread":0.2548907380635456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1045651,0.0005468571,0.0006001682,0.01057143,0.008611264,0.03321538,0.002590446,0.002613494,0.005437846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3000807,0.0008481341,0.0007053413,0.009162139,0.02384139,0.0186602,0.009548863,0.003897032,0.001374306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008837284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009007012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002851646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003391514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8553367,0.104593,0.009614507,0.006392069,0.02229478,0.001768968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5231715,0.3150262,0.05148001,0.05643117,0.04410977,0.009781457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002673454,0.0001193245,0.02876309,0.001230467,0.00005538915,0.000852879,0.4139691,0.000262149,0.002516939,0.3480318,0.009734895,0.1941967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009196695,0.0004106896,0.04498298,0.004049177,0.0001104558,0.002398404,0.3406398,0.001504176,0.003493025,0.1283079,0.4737631,0.0002483061],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5126845,0.01388286,0.07762849,0.05242947,0.003929055,0.001199753,0.0007159662,0.0006059053,0.336924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946878,0.003580191,0.02791561,0.002046096,0.00123549,0.0005994808,0.0002541263,0.0004774088,0.01701368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8954349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5529997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986938117","doi":"10.1177/0741088312439877","title":"Creating Discursive Order at the End of Life","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; Western University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Dignity; Palliative care; Rhetorical question; Negotiation; Nursing; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; End-of-life care; Psychotherapist; Autonomy; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Social science; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Catherine F. Schryer","is_ca":true},{"name":"Allan McDougall","is_ca":true},{"name":"Glendon R. Tait","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lorelei Lingard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05567541362138462,"gpt":0.3166075303263806,"spread":0.260932116704996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01518612,0.0006718289,0.0005199814,0.003589833,0.01456893,0.01407756,0.002018569,0.002230452,0.003336121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02713697,0.000474368,0.0005463996,0.001429406,0.04800358,0.01244924,0.01164515,0.004542156,0.0007546987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008341417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007041316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004534353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005570896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9814139,0.01317739,0.000545524,0.001030607,0.002867728,0.0009648102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754259,0.01526996,0.001910542,0.003179214,0.002366966,0.001847295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003501214,0.00002074967,0.0008786725,0.00008142803,0.000005103843,0.0003937338,0.7351165,0.0000982188,0.001068064,0.2469022,0.001385879,0.0140145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000404901,0.00007461402,0.001905662,0.0005934609,0.00001627712,0.0009987513,0.4925577,0.0008296075,0.002804917,0.2420996,0.2580205,0.00005835192],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3272005,0.003298481,0.1107476,0.03464791,0.001483151,0.0004499915,0.0001353033,0.0003330641,0.521704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631364,0.0005781739,0.01736494,0.001172721,0.000154999,0.000158525,0.00007746756,0.0001466172,0.01721013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01518612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08031279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001621961","doi":"10.1177/0741088312457908","title":"Theorizing Uptake and Knowledge Mobilization","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Genre analysis; Focus (optics); Sociology; Mobilization; Linguistics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Tosh Tachino","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04121751571924725,"gpt":0.2960499884212228,"spread":0.2548324727019756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01648782,0.0009492437,0.0009964439,0.009473342,0.01006277,0.0188458,0.003505155,0.005853755,0.00856341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03606761,0.0007943779,0.001121867,0.005976513,0.05224423,0.03096458,0.01705201,0.004668828,0.001374239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008939927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004473877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002864496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001463088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9785422,0.0135961,0.0007172948,0.002028526,0.003639798,0.001476071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688315,0.02352326,0.001564938,0.003361578,0.001856746,0.0008619343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000128792,0.00003168838,0.0008196506,0.0001071187,0.000008439944,0.0002326061,0.0682822,0.000199975,0.0001895529,0.9196389,0.0005275473,0.009949434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003197074,0.00003572633,0.0005942204,0.0006161368,0.00002347074,0.0002905718,0.05704663,0.001330588,0.0005288618,0.8817832,0.05770087,0.00001764562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1118494,0.004841197,0.06863761,0.02166642,0.0004138899,0.0002208708,0.00007807989,0.00009733068,0.7921953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708006,0.001581251,0.009112185,0.000964958,0.0002926624,0.0003604081,0.00007293571,0.0001050822,0.01670995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0188458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08719701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050785155","doi":"10.1177/0741088303259873","title":"Information Sourcesas a Persuasive Strategy in Editorials","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Subjectivity; Objectivity (philosophy); Cognition; Rhetoric; Fake news; Epistemology; Function (biology); Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Media studies; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Élisabeth Le","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0242173891545795,"gpt":0.2716671637244218,"spread":0.2474497745698424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02591497,0.001516176,0.0006929833,0.00913815,0.006187991,0.02250591,0.00145029,0.003020045,0.006113135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07014376,0.0008487283,0.0007891422,0.004601218,0.008527724,0.01531488,0.007286504,0.002450573,0.0009135384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003151887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002832516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005153308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00105185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9381385,0.04831125,0.001749088,0.001997204,0.008686142,0.001117852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8705214,0.1073732,0.00968466,0.004779284,0.006154111,0.001487368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008476255,0.000332087,0.007465732,0.002596016,0.0002003143,0.002489277,0.3148926,0.00104652,0.01225524,0.4195678,0.01105235,0.2272544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005716844,0.0005606372,0.01088444,0.003312199,0.0005558627,0.002402872,0.1091305,0.008012408,0.02645259,0.2798367,0.5580333,0.0002468429],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4118823,0.01818261,0.1862224,0.0250645,0.004827753,0.001032354,0.0002861507,0.001203341,0.3512986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9476331,0.001939462,0.03122395,0.0005789343,0.001302089,0.0002296762,0.0001124657,0.0002726996,0.01670777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02591497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1370531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903890557","doi":"10.1177/0741088318804822","title":"How Do Online News Genres Take Up Knowledge Claims From a Scientific Research Article on Climate Change?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; News media; Climate change; News values; Affect (linguistics); Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Literature; Art","authors":[{"name":"Nancy Davis Bray","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7246752025927391,"gpt":0.5386605569942067,"spread":0.1860146455985324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01296087,0.0004309228,0.000474448,0.004497787,0.004443612,0.01259297,0.0007157568,0.001899242,0.004195686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08374809,0.0004728988,0.0005117379,0.002714534,0.003218675,0.01017431,0.004096387,0.002328372,0.00147304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001747242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009321487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001602846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002978023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884855,0.006441831,0.0007961324,0.0008389954,0.002850935,0.0005866084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8881157,0.07861814,0.01694854,0.004191854,0.009202833,0.002922985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005290155,0.0004709291,0.1286504,0.0009260551,0.0001464129,0.001383555,0.7080824,0.0001303419,0.00778982,0.005925758,0.005658967,0.1403063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084688,0.0006177536,0.1996277,0.001464993,0.0002360155,0.001530552,0.6719587,0.001091373,0.004063174,0.00789475,0.1112251,0.0002051682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9218071,0.001421818,0.002845108,0.004844373,0.0006905282,0.0001209218,0.0001838397,0.0000707208,0.06801568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885718,0.001117084,0.002643604,0.001518307,0.0006373966,0.00008942727,0.0001907987,0.0001305253,0.00510104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.987407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06854445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161454287","doi":"10.1177/0741088308330767","title":"The Trial of the Expert Witness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Expert witness; Psychology; Credibility; Gatekeeping; Lexis; Witness; Identification (biology); Social psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Catherine F. Schryer","is_ca":true},{"name":"Elena Afros","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marcellina Mian","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marlee M. Spafford","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lorelei Lingard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03562290198096793,"gpt":0.3329470133108922,"spread":0.2973241113299242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03118838,0.000349181,0.000661403,0.0007778613,0.008254865,0.007365425,0.001970465,0.009503085,0.01332529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11422,0.0004159771,0.0004602381,0.0005027786,0.008159397,0.007166839,0.007272614,0.01074627,0.00288054],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001764117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005843547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001764392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002975794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.965843,0.01983128,0.001793697,0.00499322,0.005009829,0.002528882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481024,0.03001695,0.004229514,0.007794259,0.006005082,0.003851773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003213838,0.00009252472,0.008322967,0.0003674311,0.00008234313,0.01004331,0.04521533,0.0002279657,0.001947434,0.6239533,0.1628626,0.1465635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009329912,0.0002750238,0.002436072,0.001587825,0.00007114175,0.009521127,0.04142899,0.0005774444,0.002690285,0.08956371,0.8516658,0.00008936418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1877128,0.01117727,0.04313434,0.22029,0.02470251,0.000408498,0.0001961852,0.0002578589,0.5121205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7838685,0.002063423,0.01108722,0.08457721,0.003713309,0.00029781,0.00008460052,0.0001880374,0.1141199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03118838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1649419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169370213","doi":"10.1177/0741088311399710","title":"Professional Citation Practices in Child Maltreatment Forensic Letters","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; CLARITY; Documentation; Rhetorical question; Psychology; Forensic science; Medicine; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Catherine F. Schryer","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stephanie Bell","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marcellina Mian","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marlee M. Spafford","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lorelei Lingard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07648310226784023,"gpt":0.3098205442105482,"spread":0.233337441942708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01643454,0.0003456429,0.0005720652,0.008295359,0.005729556,0.005678733,0.001093267,0.001882348,0.002087644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1520286,0.0003998284,0.0002215784,0.00570133,0.00537502,0.003759426,0.004949721,0.001208293,0.0004689904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002654342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002451945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001760858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002837886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.957515,0.03219673,0.002600009,0.001451548,0.005522691,0.0007140806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8052242,0.1523282,0.02744273,0.00540588,0.007800153,0.001798843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001055708,0.00005075151,0.02288865,0.0004103733,0.0000135853,0.001264267,0.901801,0.00007984332,0.002136158,0.00548191,0.0007958512,0.06497195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002129617,0.0002554665,0.04692019,0.001730894,0.00004355337,0.00546,0.8767236,0.001020021,0.003556855,0.006020284,0.05814023,0.0001075837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796975,0.002973727,0.003701428,0.001524803,0.0001109783,0.00004776011,0.00004645255,0.0000558424,0.01184152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947864,0.00115331,0.002009757,0.0001577064,0.00007195374,0.00004750793,0.00003413465,0.00002975461,0.001709448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08691519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086937768","doi":"10.1177/0741088314532429","title":"Examining Readers’ Evaluations of Objectivity and Bias in News Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Argumentative; Psychology; Fidelity; Journalism; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Media studies","authors":[{"name":"Peter Cramer","is_ca":true},{"name":"Christopher Eisenhart","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1361616107818465,"gpt":0.3494360243707602,"spread":0.2132744135889137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01345765,0.0003902133,0.0004389993,0.00284277,0.001429838,0.005879912,0.00038174,0.001019991,0.001429826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05903719,0.0003312145,0.0003547266,0.001199672,0.003442112,0.003963927,0.002477338,0.0009701992,0.0001928182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001188333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004088807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007860036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008099268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896911,0.007290648,0.0006050307,0.0006214957,0.001501793,0.0002899137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9082667,0.07286675,0.01095213,0.002549065,0.004747981,0.0006172927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000715387,0.0001173625,0.1029888,0.0004241125,0.0001020691,0.0004877757,0.8343452,0.0001893047,0.0214161,0.006736,0.0002257515,0.03225212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001123152,0.001134949,0.407494,0.0007896308,0.000297331,0.00102624,0.5241216,0.002849675,0.03072322,0.01691609,0.01430994,0.0002249978],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903729,0.0002607742,0.001686291,0.0001630992,0.00001169673,0.00002614045,0.00001440127,0.0000109831,0.007453746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983708,0.0001076183,0.0008351856,0.00003808872,0.00001594483,0.0000297977,0.00001353732,0.000009249878,0.0005798741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01345765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07117176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081078295","doi":"10.1177/0741088303020002004","title":"The Effects of Pre-exam Instruction on Students' Performance on an Effective Writing Exam","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Grammar; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Psychology; Standardized test; Higher education; Medical education; Computer science; Linguistics; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Paula Saunders","is_ca":true},{"name":"Charles T. Scialfa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01228026905127934,"gpt":0.3311772975874895,"spread":0.3188970285362102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001384797,0.0005408853,0.0005067731,0.0004610225,0.0004652874,0.0006945381,0.0004903692,0.0007310849,0.004698963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02350958,0.0002458031,0.0002899971,0.0002084108,0.0003718786,0.0004197801,0.0005075306,0.001168481,0.0006185519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003777823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006780192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009854805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002457059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990933,0.0003383026,0.00009293531,0.0001078797,0.0002125682,0.0001550438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756271,0.01430571,0.002950869,0.000591068,0.001208592,0.005316551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04272632,0.136232,0.3003419,0.001018932,0.0004722384,0.001387209,0.007020306,0.001867289,0.09150894,0.0003485008,0.00221632,0.4148601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007494502,0.05912678,0.9230577,0.0001058153,0.0001821871,0.0001828445,0.001295274,0.001113013,0.01287997,0.0001762364,0.001080307,0.00005044628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993831,0.00004850439,0.00003226311,0.00002334573,0.000007665206,0.00001859059,0.000008335035,0.000007953514,0.0004702387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985048,0.00007782074,0.0002688563,0.00002570133,0.000008537335,0.00005339398,0.00004644031,0.000005401783,0.001009076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004698963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01571959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404206240","doi":"10.1177/07410883241286903","title":"Self-Regulated Strategy Development With and Without Peer Interaction: Improving High School Students’ L2 Persuasive Essay Revisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Discourse analysis; Peer feedback; Peer evaluation; Higher education; Sociology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Albert W. Li","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02443905918500817,"gpt":0.3499641123030149,"spread":0.3255250531180068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000739611,0.0005562371,0.000744023,0.0004963424,0.0002461523,0.0006508949,0.0006696098,0.0003798067,0.001189278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00278534,0.0001956232,0.0004894049,0.0002185428,0.0002148236,0.0004001162,0.0009962792,0.0004890159,0.0002587928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001815688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008250095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009086867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001385044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989512,0.0003373011,0.0001125637,0.00022381,0.0002691212,0.0001059968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999033,0.0002654076,0.0001978636,0.00008582651,0.0001535343,0.0002644548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002991966,0.04688769,0.02778628,0.001624176,0.0002916697,0.0005413766,0.006571485,0.00120665,0.1702262,0.0004000184,0.0009790732,0.7404935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005005169,0.1398169,0.6278465,0.0005298099,0.001834628,0.00119765,0.007153681,0.01946231,0.1801739,0.001161568,0.01559611,0.0002217704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982014,0.0001277744,0.0009172672,0.00002980224,0.000008855957,0.0001109495,0.000008287188,0.00005292546,0.0005428644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900085,0.0003067387,0.008031429,0.00003837355,0.00001742988,0.0002710527,0.00005477407,0.00001073433,0.001260893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001189278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00397855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214049371","doi":"10.1177/07410883211051634","title":"“Everything Is in the Lab Book”: Multimodal Writing, Activity, and Genre Analysis of Symbolic Mediation in Medical Physics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Genre analysis; Scholarship; Enculturation; Discipline; Discourse analysis; Multimodality; Mediation; Sociology; Action (physics); Linguistics; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; World Wide Web; Pedagogy","authors":[{"name":"Sara Doody","is_ca":true},{"name":"Natasha Artemeva","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0249644005577679,"gpt":0.3039945663544328,"spread":0.2790301657966649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003635983,0.0003397843,0.0002817207,0.004827921,0.003950644,0.008296701,0.0008268566,0.0009601507,0.003780519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01226592,0.0001533476,0.0003045837,0.003264908,0.01353,0.005888087,0.003406991,0.001611718,0.000315307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002936727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001955512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002278986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002613965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966041,0.002612878,0.00009961667,0.0001768858,0.0003700019,0.0001366332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885152,0.009416065,0.0007482671,0.0005447898,0.0004633189,0.0003123242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006145471,0.00008625317,0.007889328,0.0002739327,0.00001771718,0.0005395952,0.4765199,0.0003082136,0.001437508,0.4530754,0.002389988,0.05740074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003681265,0.0001123278,0.02615517,0.0009977266,0.00006335918,0.0007588824,0.5598184,0.005079351,0.004032662,0.2728383,0.1300481,0.00005895416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5997384,0.003287959,0.07165194,0.009925389,0.0003589994,0.0002232905,0.0002318819,0.0001804858,0.3144017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848106,0.0004828816,0.008415537,0.0002543533,0.00009636318,0.0001314563,0.00005961488,0.00006129574,0.005687838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02130753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311971348","doi":"10.1177/07410883221133290","title":"Humanistic Knowledge-Making and the Rhetoric of Literary Criticism: Special Topoi Meet Rhetorical Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Topos theory; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Discipline; Sociology; Epistemology; Criticism; Literary criticism; Rhetorical criticism; Humanism; Action (physics); Literature; Linguistics; Philosophy; Social science; Political science; Law; Art","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Banting","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05524094076874499,"gpt":0.3228048206590029,"spread":0.2675638798902579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02654226,0.0006444262,0.0009363065,0.009744778,0.009719834,0.01824632,0.00179347,0.003952453,0.001972418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04983754,0.0005321752,0.000593833,0.004568086,0.07698783,0.01625057,0.008904897,0.005400383,0.0003188252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006308548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003646969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001210468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001381399,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9631739,0.02753218,0.001170336,0.001674169,0.005401864,0.001047463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8938473,0.08832359,0.005677806,0.006057695,0.00468722,0.001406409],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002221346,0.00001187412,0.0009189865,0.0001900082,0.00001177255,0.0002128545,0.1645561,0.0001365322,0.0003327077,0.8232881,0.0009769055,0.009341966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002136001,0.00005522261,0.002177642,0.000966568,0.00004152511,0.000673068,0.1150517,0.001895502,0.001597445,0.7410196,0.1364578,0.00004260307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2263772,0.0136367,0.15445,0.0534955,0.002191104,0.000267277,0.00009912166,0.0003671595,0.5491158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877039,0.00070789,0.006374556,0.0009550866,0.0004537065,0.00009426747,0.0000210334,0.00008344551,0.003606171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02654226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1403705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409828213","doi":"10.1177/07410883251328315","title":"Writing in Virtual Reality: Understanding Invention, Collaboration, and Friction in Hybrid Spaces","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtual reality; Human–computer interaction; Linguistics; Collaborative writing; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Multimedia; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Mathematics education; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Rich Shivener","is_ca":true},{"name":"Elizabeth Caravella","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04378059380419397,"gpt":0.3126028296004875,"spread":0.2688222357962935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005993519,0.0003891159,0.000631319,0.003050563,0.004371066,0.01530856,0.001347116,0.001808763,0.002153745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0254054,0.0004767136,0.0005036436,0.002019999,0.01336861,0.01265973,0.007593411,0.001554803,0.0003031387],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001745246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001252005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001664047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001569246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923779,0.00525954,0.000327138,0.0006393913,0.0009261518,0.000469898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797158,0.01466792,0.002831007,0.001391898,0.0006544178,0.0007390142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001143476,0.00009999918,0.01424698,0.0003511954,0.00004293781,0.0008667705,0.8969138,0.001052379,0.002181726,0.04737948,0.000446464,0.03630392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005566836,0.0002983877,0.04070279,0.0008388427,0.00008410436,0.00228302,0.8329816,0.006178592,0.001931329,0.07147919,0.04301569,0.0001507193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9280236,0.003063449,0.02598845,0.001905915,0.00006484359,0.00006849071,0.00004126555,0.00007656365,0.04076744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996709,0.0003872806,0.001866354,0.00004802645,0.00001060513,0.00002486215,0.000009101072,0.00001233454,0.0009324832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01530856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03169709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626466063","doi":"10.1177/0741088317710925","title":"Senior Students’ Perceptions of Entering a Research Community","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Qualitative research; Perception; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Medical education; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Doug Brent","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4588577707559938,"gpt":0.606935933598727,"spread":0.1480781628427332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02349038,0.0004202101,0.0007217175,0.002195183,0.007928221,0.01232856,0.001475468,0.002403122,0.004234757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05420468,0.0006139483,0.000484011,0.001506774,0.00724519,0.004493861,0.008919701,0.004035865,0.0006016665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002854337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006014182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004603876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00492018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9696878,0.01713929,0.002200964,0.001366224,0.006492901,0.003112866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9199411,0.02497336,0.009436168,0.001824809,0.01010926,0.03371528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001352606,0.0003907499,0.03817878,0.0002076322,0.00002533099,0.0009919547,0.9335374,0.0000703789,0.002512119,0.001776657,0.001158898,0.02101479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001845497,0.0004524777,0.01495969,0.0001175868,0.00001238567,0.0006865946,0.9712006,0.0001436098,0.0003637564,0.0007661619,0.01123556,0.00004315874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910464,0.0003889587,0.0007719478,0.002178167,0.00006012478,0.00005660824,0.00001662778,0.00003856542,0.005442514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977747,0.0002431143,0.0003121534,0.0003984762,0.00001967174,0.0000295843,0.00001570252,0.00001179645,0.00119495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9765096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1242305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148181434","doi":"10.1177/0741088301018003005","title":"The Reader Written","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Sociology; Opposition (politics); Meaning (existential); Conversation analysis; Media studies; Pedagogy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Communication; Politics","authors":[{"name":"LINDA SCHWEBKE","is_ca":false},{"name":"Peter Medway","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0398884023300197,"gpt":0.2862559021472704,"spread":0.2463674998172507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001144101,0.000537993,0.0004777038,0.0009208784,0.002350905,0.007729651,0.0008105125,0.001683675,0.1383627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008413833,0.0002308247,0.0002521884,0.0009821194,0.002988572,0.004280643,0.002746744,0.002254696,0.0770457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001377675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00194939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001152958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001740903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982129,0.0005819745,0.0001431507,0.000453341,0.0004601405,0.0001484886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965532,0.001177483,0.0002694283,0.0008616337,0.0009552308,0.0001829949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001480221,0.00004201608,0.0005413074,0.0006784377,0.00001380257,0.000761182,0.03201685,0.0001267209,0.003568029,0.2458063,0.5641899,0.1521074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003436308,0.00001075472,0.0001668116,0.0001942288,0.000002239063,0.0002066049,0.002428532,0.00003131748,0.0003402729,0.00365576,0.9929544,0.00000555809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005841191,0.004182651,0.005410835,0.01839587,0.008225397,0.0001486329,0.001050581,0.0003836763,0.9563612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07121706,0.00278157,0.00298329,0.005771168,0.001379467,0.0001222685,0.001140538,0.0005320433,0.9140725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1383627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4628692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585469425","doi":"10.1177/0741088316681997","title":"“Someone Just Like Me”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Commit; Mental illness; Rhetorical question; Psychology; Autobiographical memory; Narrative inquiry; Affordance; Social psychology; Mental health; Psychotherapist; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Graham Smart","is_ca":true},{"name":"Richard A. Thompson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0422296221637719,"gpt":0.2825385808927997,"spread":0.2403089587290278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003196888,0.0005576379,0.0002940752,0.001244672,0.005709479,0.005031239,0.0008428945,0.001535115,0.006151316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01122635,0.0002025888,0.0002419875,0.0007705182,0.01025071,0.00653836,0.00310477,0.003441957,0.001786038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001880531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001439922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00148664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002258065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946811,0.004026889,0.00008689812,0.0003736001,0.0006040451,0.0002275553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940776,0.003538516,0.0007446826,0.0003140301,0.000806438,0.0005187473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003668816,0.00003696202,0.001858568,0.0002668687,0.00001129075,0.0007855904,0.8521879,0.00005359069,0.001239918,0.1040636,0.01905518,0.02040381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007727849,0.00007099943,0.001608815,0.000383305,0.00001250824,0.001883562,0.4726313,0.0002439243,0.001197151,0.014163,0.5077673,0.00003031915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3712907,0.006534107,0.04084525,0.05410276,0.003040491,0.0002635659,0.0002749608,0.0003508836,0.5232972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9309434,0.001790192,0.006654626,0.005546551,0.0004473318,0.0001257926,0.0001141247,0.0001433608,0.05423464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006151316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02057821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413057307","doi":"10.1177/07410883251349202","title":"Ecologies of Research Writing in Chinese Universities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Framing (construction); China; Literacy; Sociology; Academic writing; Professional writing; Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Pedagogy; Political science; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Ibrar Bhatt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09599190855159516,"gpt":0.4844549229932398,"spread":0.3884630144416447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006052477,0.0003150579,0.000527052,0.0142075,0.00872773,0.007390114,0.001259914,0.0007143663,0.003736453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01452587,0.000478601,0.000362251,0.009725669,0.009016406,0.004821139,0.007204469,0.0007718494,0.0003005719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006901727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008120295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02203553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0341894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919658,0.003620469,0.000875301,0.001126967,0.00113793,0.001273552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851657,0.007417396,0.003239938,0.001186697,0.001584001,0.001406243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001541902,0.0001104539,0.3300882,0.0003477111,0.00003482386,0.001448461,0.581154,0.000653985,0.001486023,0.01761539,0.0006518862,0.06625483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002536557,0.0001100551,0.4521084,0.0002036178,0.0000389874,0.0004826585,0.5168077,0.002662507,0.0007920447,0.01193762,0.01472862,0.0001023761],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858761,0.0004070386,0.001028698,0.0007433437,0.00001064149,0.00005593622,0.0001118034,0.00002927238,0.01173721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998522,0.0001281829,0.0004970461,0.00003151213,0.000007294282,0.00003531167,0.00005151914,0.000009647139,0.0007174897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05007577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392131386","doi":"10.1177/07410883231222882","title":"Prolepsis and Rendering Futures in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Reports","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Ministry of Colleges and Universities; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Politics; Futures contract; Rhetorical device; Sociology; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Ashley Rose Mehlenbacher","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sara Doody","is_ca":true},{"name":"Carolyn Eckert","is_ca":true},{"name":"Brad Mehlenbacher","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06083790103458094,"gpt":0.2894929488527195,"spread":0.2286550478181386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0339564,0.0005230847,0.0003894206,0.009102172,0.006076163,0.01416272,0.001338318,0.00264054,0.00444631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08010465,0.0004275517,0.0004898135,0.006854492,0.02566409,0.01487826,0.005159895,0.004128159,0.0005209188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00672736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003449589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002925601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00294688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9705181,0.02390071,0.001171219,0.001024538,0.002738458,0.0006469894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8828291,0.1050815,0.004536516,0.003722214,0.003113148,0.0007174557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002867198,0.000007054215,0.0006253814,0.0001442811,0.000005669583,0.0001392512,0.1040109,0.0001652834,0.000396984,0.8809773,0.002436109,0.01106307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002973025,0.00005794051,0.002824748,0.001798064,0.00002999974,0.0003352874,0.1474758,0.0019352,0.002217054,0.5231545,0.3200734,0.00006836768],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1870201,0.01221907,0.1334995,0.08154155,0.004017095,0.0003111451,0.0009495437,0.0004172803,0.5800248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720674,0.001914079,0.01689061,0.001654017,0.0006316455,0.0001741143,0.000204928,0.0002127978,0.006250447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1795808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399095527","doi":"10.1177/07410883241242106","title":"The Discursive Boundary Work of Recontextualizing Science for Policy: Opening the Black Box of an Organization’s Genre System and Intermediary Genre Sets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary-work; Genre analysis; Discourse analysis; Work (physics); Boundary (topology); Sociology; Black box; Linguistics; Critical discourse analysis; Social science; Political science; Physics; Computer science; Ideology","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Falconer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02310936365677129,"gpt":0.3032826306948683,"spread":0.280173267038097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03139338,0.0006649554,0.0007136818,0.008330112,0.03228206,0.029039,0.002871549,0.003462097,0.003815094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05215229,0.0005949036,0.0005275377,0.00581777,0.1180228,0.01775899,0.01320058,0.005453445,0.0004294972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02873712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02695274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0953295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07364294,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9580624,0.03315195,0.0008540556,0.001842557,0.004160122,0.00192897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9293211,0.05584696,0.003675954,0.005324512,0.003530429,0.002301103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001893543,0.00001379802,0.001177717,0.00007554693,0.000005146541,0.0002416227,0.821674,0.0000770097,0.0004022675,0.1672258,0.001056636,0.008031456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001796934,0.0000199905,0.002090791,0.0005630929,0.00001524105,0.0002248383,0.8347287,0.0004446626,0.001006472,0.06909256,0.09175597,0.00003970566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4919661,0.004681296,0.0424585,0.04637579,0.000586012,0.0003676489,0.0001703336,0.0001672202,0.4132271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871291,0.0005331904,0.006054789,0.0007575603,0.00008080056,0.0001132548,0.00003568239,0.0001001,0.005195413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2085033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012380917","doi":"10.1177/0741088309353505","title":"Constitutive Rhetoric as an Aspect of Audience Design: The Public Texts of Canadian Suffragists","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Suffrage; Skepticism; Politics; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Katja Thieme","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09000716837523187,"gpt":0.2796484686237296,"spread":0.1896413002484977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008964189,0.0005989133,0.0005746265,0.00600483,0.03229137,0.01331176,0.00131788,0.002469448,0.003253926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02254183,0.0005210226,0.0002319731,0.005204601,0.03478792,0.003895181,0.005275048,0.003424482,0.0001986655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07924756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04741925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7811275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8629937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929358,0.002765047,0.0001551205,0.0004523884,0.002493183,0.001198344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840426,0.01069332,0.001193,0.0006026266,0.002718236,0.0007501787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003428405,0.000008533893,0.001388625,0.0001077467,0.00000570757,0.0003276229,0.8892998,0.00007147664,0.0008766565,0.09754065,0.001918486,0.008420418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002784947,0.0000332348,0.01601086,0.0004852184,0.0000493084,0.0003435952,0.6971999,0.0005610359,0.002487325,0.01649782,0.2661947,0.0001091121],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6302999,0.003772144,0.004977321,0.01820852,0.0003057432,0.00009329104,0.0001679921,0.0001231282,0.3420519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933682,0.0003234525,0.0003588466,0.0003034634,0.00003646494,0.00001186226,0.00001903685,0.00002943091,0.005549232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2188725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.574984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416101014","doi":"10.1177/07410883251372206","title":"Generative Artificial Intelligence, Interdisciplinarity, and the Global English-Medium Knowledge Economy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Digital Education and Society","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Transformative learning; Generative grammar; Discipline; Agency (philosophy); Legitimacy; Knowledge production; Credibility; Knowledge economy","authors":[{"name":"Pejman Habibie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0216935938038693,"gpt":0.317477019247239,"spread":0.2957834254433697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005053291,0.000341913,0.0004079043,0.002568343,0.002622242,0.0111412,0.001085623,0.00170749,0.002684882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006915424,0.0001513285,0.0004099192,0.002320008,0.0301006,0.008345638,0.005546286,0.001944856,0.0002982435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003475439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002868611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001314995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002124481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971705,0.001728224,0.00009270976,0.0002896284,0.0003908965,0.0003280546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909443,0.006797714,0.0005400105,0.001187089,0.0002733891,0.000257581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005519994,0.000009850021,0.0005897781,0.00007073076,0.000004549617,0.00007134964,0.01132656,0.0003157429,0.00008365064,0.9773971,0.0003087987,0.009816406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007290522,0.00002586761,0.001342239,0.0003718824,0.00001123345,0.000180498,0.02275931,0.001369135,0.0004625804,0.8925439,0.08090575,0.00002033058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2068841,0.01932243,0.07126351,0.04172212,0.0006164378,0.00006234256,0.0000832491,0.0001481366,0.6598976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988663,0.002564291,0.003556256,0.000696396,0.0001025403,0.00002756173,0.00001697734,0.00002577296,0.004347228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0267247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}