{"id":"W1022707983","doi":"","title":"The Court's Mulligan: a commennt on Canada (attorney general) v. Hislop","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dissent; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Mulligan; Sociology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005668033,0.0004129301,0.0004485983,0.00004743905,0.005700297,0.0001989205,0.0006249161,0.0001929196,0.0001397436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004014679,0.0003418044,0.0002072022,0.0005524821,0.003697172,0.0001919198,0.00008095805,0.0004248656,0.0001775759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001365541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003663259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4416851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7764248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970577,0.0002914421,0.000585043,0.0005036144,0.0006942978,0.0008678429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980685,0.0007051782,0.0002439925,0.0003592744,0.0003086195,0.0003143949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000334436,0.0001731158,0.0002936187,0.00001074323,0.0001283311,0.00008119592,0.000589464,0.0008268792,0.00001582792,0.9159229,0.06632354,0.01560097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003241361,0.0001054391,0.001498821,0.0003616935,0.00009772118,0.00002579752,0.002267944,0.0001273445,0.00003467064,0.01983978,0.974871,0.0004456747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02598377,0.05350959,0.0002888401,0.458113,0.0104441,0.0008973614,0.000218771,0.0001353537,0.4504092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696285,0.01364588,0.0001415434,0.006221923,0.002701601,0.00003267397,0.00001577038,0.000009819326,0.007602317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02772144878400013,"score_gpt":0.2595618466863037,"score_spread":0.2318403979023035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}