{"id":"W1022707983","doi":"","title":"The Court's Mulligan: a commennt on Canada (attorney general) v. Hislop","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dissent; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Political science; Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Mulligan; Sociology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001780227,0.0004776007,0.0004521798,0.0008775841,0.02489193,0.007596718,0.002500766,0.01096249,0.007229485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00498062,0.0005302019,0.0006919067,0.001308817,0.005428606,0.001791523,0.001551782,0.009747392,0.0007133153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03701377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06578334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963925,0.0003449247,0.00005232563,0.0003578503,0.001421464,0.001430903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981857,0.0005060461,0.00004181942,0.00006281192,0.000802208,0.0004013989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008324585,0.0000420335,0.003088583,0.00007292477,0.00003676079,0.001011132,0.006196563,0.000231491,0.0009756789,0.4899656,0.4823699,0.01592601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008247995,0.00005668293,0.01604334,0.0003425928,0.00009140274,0.0002416343,0.009730482,0.0009491206,0.001653912,0.04487095,0.9257496,0.0001878939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.06012536,0.01690301,0.002044432,0.4440747,0.003609243,0.0002146887,0.002431121,0.0001743704,0.4704231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4668962,0.004078596,0.001991326,0.1906732,0.0005514306,0.00008863605,0.0004383484,0.0001005316,0.3351818],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03701377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2685549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02772144878400013,"score_gpt":0.2595618466863037,"score_spread":0.2318403979023035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}