{"id":"W1023462183","doi":"","title":"Judging the Judges: Wittgenstein’s Sceptical Paradox for Debates in the Philosophy of Neuroscience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Skepticism; Rebuttal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Philosophy of science; Criticism; Computer science; Law; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007557769,0.000105462,0.000139144,0.00004366812,0.0002396124,0.00001394619,0.0008701786,0.00004919698,0.0001110299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002641693,0.00004953341,0.00008347743,0.0004699219,0.001882399,0.00007547963,0.00005206633,0.0001567156,0.000034178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007699673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002026699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001940378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004189252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986821,0.0001634938,0.0002436076,0.0002990789,0.0002584045,0.0003533279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985328,0.0009089672,0.00005094526,0.0004265577,0.00002970106,0.00005097195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003991794,0.0001282251,0.001437085,0.000003110684,0.000001833482,0.000008766391,0.001675082,0.000008738445,0.0006815881,0.9955022,0.0001973859,0.0003160746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005406106,0.000400226,0.05970124,0.00001174578,0.00001128033,0.000121441,0.0005426117,0.0009808862,0.000605338,0.9359338,0.0009858179,0.0001650134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5890474,0.0001227036,0.003702054,0.02890932,0.00044115,0.0007338511,0.000007621808,0.00004002407,0.3769959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947281,0.000005844689,0.0001391249,0.004875938,0.00009775261,0.00005819843,4.206267e-7,0.0000056117,0.00008893853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4056808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6935776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08853960830108905,"score_gpt":0.3280988044858953,"score_spread":0.2395591961848063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}