{"id":"W1023462183","doi":"","title":"Judging the Judges: Wittgenstein’s Sceptical Paradox for Debates in the Philosophy of Neuroscience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Skepticism; Rebuttal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Philosophy of science; Criticism; Computer science; Law; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01516638,0.0004519592,0.0009525515,0.003608247,0.006167609,0.009583751,0.002258282,0.009618483,0.003205002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0424602,0.0005511969,0.0008354591,0.002151627,0.06424239,0.02251438,0.004709396,0.01704926,0.000757119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00534393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003007561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002951598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001905082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909407,0.004247215,0.0003385952,0.001303375,0.002680384,0.0004896852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763873,0.0189269,0.0009804924,0.001606256,0.001563647,0.0005353437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000664165,0.000004180291,0.0000427357,0.000009942504,0.000003116565,0.00003282624,0.001370928,0.0000703741,0.00002688214,0.9940824,0.002636983,0.001713013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006366103,0.000001995444,0.00003157564,0.00002277718,0.000001464567,0.00002274581,0.0002930088,0.0001754667,0.00004656055,0.9936908,0.005701537,0.000005646109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06327713,0.01482591,0.08746279,0.5708095,0.002623409,0.00005539063,0.0001145057,0.0002700237,0.2605614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9258221,0.002637722,0.01547098,0.0434807,0.001695325,0.0001121461,0.00003804744,0.0002025298,0.01054035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01516638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08020848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08853960830108905,"score_gpt":0.3280988044858953,"score_spread":0.2395591961848063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}