{"id":"W1038600807","doi":"","title":"Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01895639,0.0007804649,0.0008029343,0.006021769,0.031596,0.02768412,0.00532694,0.008779661,0.01551524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05932511,0.0008158311,0.0008320747,0.007933733,0.04548611,0.01296508,0.007379092,0.01213314,0.0006270076],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2543741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4023037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9826241,0.003675052,0.0004203131,0.001639136,0.007478792,0.004162671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693338,0.01134689,0.0008317269,0.002771568,0.0128342,0.002881804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001223516,0.00001233458,0.0009093874,0.00003895883,0.000008163271,0.00004036038,0.009612646,0.000747484,0.00007824138,0.9341765,0.03776054,0.01660318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002665031,0.00001214556,0.005417585,0.0003334757,0.00004609822,0.00003116408,0.02019817,0.003411918,0.0004121372,0.394137,0.5758395,0.0001340676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05066328,0.006923204,0.01714282,0.4957275,0.002506897,0.0001666172,0.0007047586,0.0003388769,0.425826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8411781,0.006082955,0.01812836,0.04522454,0.0006929451,0.0001530884,0.0003637604,0.0005229484,0.08765336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2543741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8648204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007317299053915045,"score_gpt":0.193302972243602,"score_spread":0.1859856731896869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}