{"id":"W1039579228","doi":"10.1007/s11417-015-9215-0","title":"Evidence of Convergent Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Sentencing Verdicts and Newspaper Accounts of South Korean Parricides","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Verdict; Convergence (economics); Emic and etic; Homicide; Criminology; Convergent validity; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Advertising; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Economics; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009583757,0.00009842865,0.0007833829,0.0006560941,0.00007133915,0.00001131539,0.000228315,0.00007700046,0.00007647443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006953733,0.0000847577,0.0002556363,0.0006104002,0.0005679717,0.0002389773,0.00004444651,0.0001272932,9.453059e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005955431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003724723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003934872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003528084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981695,0.0003905882,0.0006912508,0.0001239512,0.0004511329,0.0001736092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997116,0.0002690019,0.001140893,0.0001445249,0.001177573,0.0001520174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006470654,0.0002666364,0.2940336,0.0001185303,0.003707832,0.00004054232,0.6753867,0.001158987,0.002745692,0.001608604,0.0002716416,0.02001417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000314205,0.0006208033,0.03536031,0.0001507339,0.009294585,0.00001698708,0.9513716,0.0002538093,0.002145,0.0003093726,0.00006519623,0.0000973963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969838,0.0008998829,0.001003605,0.0002869552,0.0001863447,0.00004552017,0.000004681557,0.000002525507,0.0005867132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992467,0.0003313229,0.0003209111,0.00002820216,0.00005380306,6.13786e-7,6.058209e-7,0.000002823408,0.00001498785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2759849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5948375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2738482883284848,"score_gpt":0.3891674037864582,"score_spread":0.1153191154579734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}