{"id":"W105900370","doi":"10.1007/1-4020-3169-6_15","title":"Comparison of the General Load Line Method with the Finite Element Method","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Line (geometry); Homogeneous; Series (stratigraphy); Core (optical fiber); Mixed finite element method; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Structural engineering; Geometry; Engineering; Geology; Telecommunications; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000547453,0.0003316811,0.0005349468,0.00004825132,0.00005703316,0.00001715063,0.0003048089,0.000176691,0.0008543563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002013827,0.0001634177,0.0001795284,0.00009214155,0.00005412686,0.00001425235,0.00005307485,0.0005011423,0.000008412072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007143733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003678571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004993997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000502509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998498,0.0001414434,0.0004732257,0.0002137626,0.0004549173,0.0002186996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998322,0.0008639536,0.0001594187,0.0005061133,0.0001052912,0.00004327613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002909991,0.00002601219,0.00003428163,0.00006611688,0.0002713659,9.036984e-7,0.0001128314,0.8649909,0.00158214,0.03196914,0.01531073,0.0856064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003532256,0.0002337437,0.0001187547,0.00004034776,0.0002236561,0.00000299644,0.000006706857,0.5813199,0.01034851,0.002007034,0.405021,0.000324125],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001289054,0.0005454008,0.6410838,0.0002577245,0.0000959825,0.0002511166,0.000007081321,0.00007144466,0.3576745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001468823,0.00002217384,0.6318591,0.0002884905,0.0001913822,0.00001520488,0.00001118443,0.00008477997,0.3660588],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3897102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9354602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0300463087765034,"score_gpt":0.3364200837722628,"score_spread":0.3063737749957595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}