{"id":"W109161873","doi":"10.1533/9781908818089.201","title":"Implications of empirical data: are pharmaceutical linkage regulations a success? * *This chapter is based upon material in R.A. Bouchard, ‘I’m Still Your Baby: Canada’s Continuing Support of U.S. Linkage Regulations for Pharmaceuticals,’ Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 15(1): 79–146 (2011).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Linkage (software); Legitimacy; Legislation; Enforcement; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Business; Public administration; Economics; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1094087,0.0009980362,0.002343397,0.005583377,0.003143838,0.01416007,0.005016233,0.007319867,0.03690211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5575378,0.0009911861,0.001550852,0.01220848,0.01735058,0.01795089,0.003658645,0.009082844,0.006647731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006662607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009158984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02189554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01638366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8655834,0.08791191,0.007758021,0.01047182,0.02568507,0.002589721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2488293,0.6600978,0.04223597,0.02308926,0.02379881,0.001949002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002767767,0.0002318218,0.04978697,0.001737069,0.0006475743,0.0009799639,0.001758003,0.001559277,0.0001339568,0.521667,0.333775,0.08744654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003068152,0.0001340777,0.0268216,0.004994783,0.0005370845,0.000399749,0.005856676,0.005644538,0.001023483,0.7078106,0.246321,0.0001494234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01885208,0.0479643,0.01878716,0.7632233,0.004463945,0.0002957876,0.007258445,0.000237109,0.1389179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7105883,0.03765538,0.01803159,0.1946369,0.01286989,0.0009180609,0.00540738,0.0005559804,0.01933664],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9781045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5786155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1360508307603358,"score_gpt":0.3453243042707612,"score_spread":0.2092734735104253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}