{"id":"W1111091419","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.003","title":"Assimilation of radar quantitative precipitation estimations in the Canadian Precipitation Analysis (CaPA)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Precipitation Measurement and Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Quantitative precipitation estimation; Environmental science; Radar; Meteorology; Precipitation; Quantitative precipitation forecast; Weather radar; Global Precipitation Measurement; Climatology; Computer science; Geography; Telecommunications; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00148567,0.001044092,0.0006038026,0.001663969,0.001257696,0.001479723,0.001497112,0.000546989,0.002267248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003404539,0.0004941567,0.0006683949,0.002823691,0.000335432,0.0009093047,0.0007209517,0.000950883,0.00110401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005949236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01587492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9481249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9605212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992193,0.00007261623,0.00003938727,0.0001935183,0.0003431671,0.0001319486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977008,0.00009341039,0.0001034214,0.000180477,0.001817656,0.0001042433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000919703,0.0006515607,0.1392813,0.0005425677,0.000864052,0.0001657051,0.0004223294,0.3803556,0.03949416,0.004921084,0.08761308,0.3447689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002682676,0.00005726507,0.1977595,0.00007505002,0.0002149841,0.00004951674,0.0001484963,0.7625328,0.01132394,0.0008571027,0.02651195,0.0002010764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7792447,0.002308738,0.07954702,0.00149202,0.001161866,0.0005124427,0.1035064,0.009036585,0.02319019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8960456,0.0006055019,0.06136112,0.000204773,0.00009291559,0.0001492082,0.03644347,0.0004393067,0.004658049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05187511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1043612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0659194257920925,"score_gpt":0.2901420700190869,"score_spread":0.2242226442269944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}