{"id":"W111322625","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2007.028","title":"Trophic Status Evaluation for 154 Lakes in Quebec, Canada: Monitoring and Recommendations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Watershed; Trophic level; Secchi disk; Water quality; Environmental science; Transparency (behavior); Environmental resource management; Geography; Government (linguistics); Environmental monitoring; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Nutrient; Business; Eutrophication; Ecology; Environmental engineering; Political science; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01371765,0.00006775562,0.0001132637,0.00007503682,0.0003432122,0.0001008282,0.0001083595,0.00004164812,0.0003047303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002724463,0.00005057743,0.00002291163,0.0001113141,0.00005654318,0.0002159148,0.00006180393,0.000331618,0.000007323622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001428394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000168024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6570406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976025,0.0004970228,0.0004054149,0.0001552474,0.0007742749,0.0005655143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992294,0.000337755,0.00005597483,0.0001080291,0.00007178062,0.0001970775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001676861,0.00009971572,0.896634,0.00006637371,0.00003366268,0.00001878641,0.005722919,0.001143759,0.009874992,0.0002964185,0.003758518,0.08218315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001910454,0.0001219761,0.9245383,0.0001203801,0.00001213824,0.00002809251,0.00698075,0.008008778,0.002638744,0.008135971,0.04718308,0.0003214069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964166,0.00006757883,0.0005778792,0.002021851,0.0001999985,0.0003148409,0.00001206222,0.000002744617,0.0003865017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985361,0.00004274101,0.0005265627,0.00001321629,0.0001312582,0.00001741499,0.00001391086,0.000006900867,0.0007119731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3234867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4754292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1071922620002627,"score_gpt":0.4087563394369647,"score_spread":0.301564077436702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}