{"id":"W111322625","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2007.028","title":"Trophic Status Evaluation for 154 Lakes in Quebec, Canada: Monitoring and Recommendations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Watershed; Trophic level; Secchi disk; Water quality; Environmental science; Transparency (behavior); Environmental resource management; Geography; Government (linguistics); Environmental monitoring; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Nutrient; Business; Eutrophication; Ecology; Environmental engineering; Political science; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001022765,0.0004264794,0.0002839995,0.002229209,0.001695693,0.0007386341,0.0006147338,0.0002555482,0.002069428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001727643,0.0001896597,0.0003001295,0.002692363,0.0002999476,0.0002944446,0.0003803212,0.000197577,0.0002446455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01762842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01567622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9830406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996142,0.00004970954,0.00003701649,0.00004961812,0.0001628247,0.00008656913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977213,0.00009452704,0.0001755479,0.00004000069,0.001729888,0.0002388716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001241615,0.0000512544,0.9455726,0.0001778859,0.00006451172,0.0001934784,0.0005304415,0.00102847,0.001881282,0.0001252587,0.006431223,0.04381934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001153509,0.00004098837,0.9925638,0.00005941418,0.00003961062,0.00003379695,0.0008149499,0.00156702,0.0004845811,0.0000196322,0.00435083,0.00001370914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973944,0.001816267,0.001132007,0.00101658,0.00002291375,0.0004857182,0.01259038,0.0001184378,0.008873773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782536,0.00100669,0.005580824,0.0001938788,0.000008642342,0.000234535,0.006607412,0.00001290788,0.008101479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01762842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1279037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1071922620002627,"score_gpt":0.4087563394369647,"score_spread":0.301564077436702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}