{"id":"W1123112189","doi":"","title":"Rational Choice and Reasonable Interactions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic interaction; Simple (philosophy); Rational choice theory (criminology); Rational agent; Game theory; Economics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Management science; Microeconomics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Neoclassical economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001669063,0.00009432243,0.0002557382,0.00002083896,0.0002102127,0.00003660015,0.00007653271,0.00002050675,0.001115413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008292779,0.00008858083,0.00007368449,0.0000912051,0.00009146752,0.0002694692,0.00005341306,0.0001036397,0.001095089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004998669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001141688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001613086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001760842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992842,0.000007890832,0.000333158,0.0002216364,0.00002981331,0.0001232804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996364,0.00004676433,0.0001116492,0.0001225048,0.0000273952,0.00005533923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.692121e-7,0.00003794258,0.001504484,0.0001255918,0.00002722446,2.635209e-7,0.000008304,0.000002053299,0.000001072698,0.9872268,0.008759305,0.002306304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001171573,0.000007005669,0.003997814,0.0002529823,0.00001066044,0.00001015617,9.362768e-7,0.00004169981,0.000003220144,0.005368181,0.9900801,0.000110068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001555285,0.5210249,0.0002270449,0.03387852,0.0002618887,0.0002794295,0.00008432802,0.00004030181,0.4426482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7375249,0.2245413,0.001318385,0.02595486,0.0009115684,0.0002127288,0.00007378613,0.00001888578,0.009443572],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04293868435832065,"score_gpt":0.2588586688575243,"score_spread":0.2159199844992037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}