{"id":"W1137110739","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.202542","title":"The Economics of Forest Carbon Sequestration Revisited: A Challenge for Emissions Offset Trading","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Carbon offset; Carbon sequestration; Natural resource economics; Additionality; Carbon credit; Carbon tax; Carbon price; Greenhouse gas; Bioenergy; Carbon accounting; Carbon neutrality; Cellulosic ethanol; Subsidy; Business; Emissions trading; Environmental science; Revenue; Climate change mitigation; Renewable energy; Climate change; Environmental economics; Economics; Finance; Ecology; Carbon dioxide; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002421875,0.0005141606,0.001341809,0.001098165,0.001450737,0.007026788,0.001330935,0.006835599,0.00513654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003081317,0.0003727945,0.001056052,0.001455676,0.007291469,0.01102745,0.002210799,0.009749196,0.0003406498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004461483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002712597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004585126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005520857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986559,0.0005948177,0.00003578383,0.0001508398,0.0003750901,0.0001874465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969189,0.002372073,0.0001967671,0.0001164428,0.0002430497,0.0001527751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001828816,0.00002189545,0.0002014115,0.00007527749,0.00001268089,0.00009667472,0.00007285638,0.005834292,0.0001680667,0.9793901,0.00220036,0.01190807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001353782,0.00002989477,0.0005169432,0.0002203526,0.000009345807,0.00016537,0.0003416571,0.006708298,0.0001081951,0.9691952,0.02266672,0.00002451406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06580535,0.2086758,0.0527789,0.4429806,0.00160676,0.00006768303,0.0002231574,0.00007713908,0.2277846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8571014,0.08869372,0.009401359,0.01675964,0.005296804,0.00009668812,0.00004975227,0.0000875415,0.02251298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007026788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03237045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05846924820234777,"score_gpt":0.2650968595236942,"score_spread":0.2066276113213464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}