{"id":"W115256144","doi":"10.11575/prism/35560","title":"Connectivity of co-changed method groups: a case study on open source systems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Java; Source code; Source lines of code; Cloning (programming); Open source software; Software development; Software maintenance; Software engineering; Software; Software system; Open source; Coding (social sciences); Code review; Codebase; Programming language; Static program analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001614895,0.0001113914,0.0003199717,0.0002293353,0.0001268303,0.00003167897,0.001198773,0.00006573059,0.00001105981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001708716,0.0001284514,0.00005837299,0.0003424841,0.00004881969,0.0005652051,0.0009297513,0.0001944697,0.00001449485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008492442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004548548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007563056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000113319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985477,0.0004013731,0.0001081547,0.0002690457,0.000399493,0.0002742606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979184,0.001056171,0.0001156201,0.0006559172,0.00008621277,0.0001676503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004794881,0.008294108,0.3721661,0.0008181232,0.001298229,0.005269323,0.2285845,0.0002751133,0.002811742,0.01826995,0.004022825,0.3577106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009882242,0.004052744,0.4542354,0.0002948576,0.0002089646,0.001440111,0.01786395,0.5016446,0.002661715,0.0001618959,0.006001074,0.001552535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4433033,0.00003593695,0.5558475,0.00002532639,0.00007824318,0.0003986177,2.720425e-7,0.00005467815,0.0002560801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538562,0.000001337722,0.04589014,0.000005260152,0.00001006957,0.000001706214,5.227957e-7,0.000008806604,0.0002259696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5105529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04552258295416647,"score_gpt":0.2964718612158843,"score_spread":0.2509492782617178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}