{"id":"W1165338846","doi":"10.1007/s10668-015-9696-0","title":"A comparative review for understanding elite interest and climate change policy in China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environment Development and Sustainability","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Climate change; Pluralism (philosophy); China; Political science; Environmentalism; Authoritarianism; Political economy; Beijing; Neglect; Politics; Political economy of climate change; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Democracy; Law; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002755898,0.0003712863,0.001157546,0.0002572226,0.0003732776,0.00007916124,0.0001923227,0.0001694952,0.00002960123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002012276,0.0003248526,0.00009362949,0.0002105289,0.0003089521,0.0002362354,0.0002662426,0.0002059281,0.000005510471],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004502338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008523001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009233568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002638835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976221,0.0003173678,0.0006675004,0.000542557,0.0003103729,0.0005400672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992321,0.0001748788,0.0002503342,0.0001280019,0.00003580755,0.0001788615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001895687,0.00009456553,0.0008321395,0.03130975,0.0000699195,0.000007592071,0.02547652,5.328929e-8,2.768144e-9,0.09350059,0.0002561912,0.8484337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002049038,0.0000192696,0.0008864818,0.007842856,0.00005179334,0.000001112231,0.002265426,0.000001365817,2.398309e-8,0.009079959,0.9792642,0.0003826037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008147323,0.9912174,0.00005578493,0.002202327,0.00007599532,0.003989982,0.00002249839,0.00002046916,0.00233408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007917235,0.9971322,0.0003340716,0.0001014063,0.0001106436,0.0009501367,0.0001222489,0.00001749732,0.0004400278],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.979008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2038954171219508,"score_gpt":0.4163983493595486,"score_spread":0.2125029322375978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}