{"id":"W117043523","doi":"10.29173/agora10084","title":"The American Judiciary Through the Lens of The Federalist Papers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Federalist; Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Judicial restraint; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00307075,0.0001586132,0.0001931005,0.00002521727,0.0117125,0.0003424482,0.002669379,0.00003063296,0.00004593248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001391149,0.00005910189,0.0002291208,0.001020249,0.05328581,0.0003481242,0.0002527858,0.0006251693,0.0000185533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003285875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004059452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03071612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002337185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955068,0.0008885183,0.0004075738,0.0001885264,0.001536394,0.001472169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972125,0.001240045,0.0004102553,0.0004921875,0.0003157286,0.0003292789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001077925,0.00002638267,0.0008455015,5.306918e-7,0.00001886862,0.000001831578,0.001541971,0.000003936068,0.00006102248,0.9962137,0.0009270955,0.0003483398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223989,0.0001039242,0.03776443,0.00002731363,0.00008031718,0.0001095427,0.02784979,0.00001762828,0.0001890964,0.7696073,0.1639273,0.0002008958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06343608,0.00009606697,0.0001755584,0.3174801,0.0008883141,0.0002115769,0.00001066857,0.00002343508,0.6176782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892229,0.0002347282,0.0001043653,0.009095086,0.00051124,0.000003946314,1.123258e-7,0.000007518523,0.0008201263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9257868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04877377653511141,"score_gpt":0.3215762806192961,"score_spread":0.2728025040841847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}