{"id":"W1173137460","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.07.004","title":"Value and provision of ecosystem services from prairie wetlands: A choice experiment approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosystem Services","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Wildlife; Business; Environmental resource management; Value (mathematics); Willingness to pay; Habitat; Wetland conservation; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007339244,0.0002493403,0.0006234071,0.0001282315,0.00007690011,0.00009847189,0.0003179128,0.0001557476,0.00007476331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005902334,0.0002587506,0.00007595058,0.00009411613,0.00001406465,0.0006013025,0.000175082,0.00007662451,0.0003865899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001791891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001489904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002646732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001184874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980527,0.00005535604,0.0009303499,0.0006300682,0.00008932514,0.0002421839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984744,0.00005012986,0.0008292766,0.000447395,0.00002364781,0.0001751597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005226649,0.000288899,0.9819498,0.001843465,0.0002185024,0.000001265858,0.007424109,0.00149384,0.0001874232,0.006136353,0.0001167452,0.000287352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008131051,0.0007783087,0.4167789,0.0009986596,0.0001246563,0.00002419755,0.0244253,0.4594664,0.003023436,0.00658685,0.07776732,0.001895003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868832,0.005069019,0.0002102038,0.0001202499,0.0004051552,0.0005614384,0.0004487541,0.0000472478,0.006254697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980652,0.00007264945,0.001174829,0.00007895317,0.0001866034,0.00008997351,0.0001957146,0.00003534117,0.0001007082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5651709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05425134523271538,"score_gpt":0.2140267979001806,"score_spread":0.1597754526674652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}