{"id":"W118265215","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2006/v9i2a2817","title":"Deference and Diffèrance: Judicial Review and the Perfect Gift","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Judicial deference; Economic Justice; Positivism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Liberalism; Relation (database); Judicial restraint; Action (physics); Political science; Judicial activism; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006972998,0.0008185538,0.001544636,0.0001132622,0.01186462,0.002249127,0.002615366,0.0004048516,0.0002445084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003174784,0.0005951649,0.0004584334,0.0003007262,0.007589112,0.001677237,0.0006874602,0.00326256,0.00005660497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008011354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001065925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004702923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009512031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919617,0.001611847,0.00108677,0.001019608,0.00147854,0.002841509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946739,0.0008201947,0.001468958,0.001681403,0.0004914263,0.0008641127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008447648,0.000176104,0.003473362,0.0004287582,0.001115228,0.00009919647,0.02300258,0.000005468336,0.0001189359,0.9359155,0.00316117,0.03165896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00871342,0.0006449646,0.001592869,0.001021618,0.002285791,0.0006012531,0.003897778,0.00007170264,0.0001414085,0.09121913,0.8881078,0.001702322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09436609,0.6852048,0.0005323313,0.09011768,0.00138659,0.003418372,0.00003728766,0.0004532648,0.1244836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8539659,0.1410246,0.0002364935,0.001228713,0.001538228,0.000120237,0.0000033539,0.0000926545,0.001789736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8849466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01071627811948244,"score_gpt":0.3077214943842939,"score_spread":0.2970052162648114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}