{"id":"W1184397367","doi":"10.5553/ijodr/235250102015002001002","title":"Creating New Pathways to Justice Using Simple Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Online dispute resolution; Simple (philosophy); Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Resolution (logic); Alternative dispute resolution; Psychology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008607796,0.0005178324,0.0004765113,0.002774239,0.002978932,0.0106618,0.002813086,0.002510619,0.01477046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02173158,0.0005046957,0.0008349069,0.001628145,0.006189765,0.01695913,0.01053344,0.002598654,0.002812165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001980347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003344027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00170327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003359312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916,0.004692781,0.0006303783,0.0007196132,0.001973212,0.0003839418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855931,0.008385949,0.001379552,0.002833704,0.001018699,0.0007889712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001029985,0.0006723836,0.004782439,0.0008904854,0.00007055264,0.0007522078,0.01733004,0.007644969,0.00553717,0.6005867,0.01052972,0.3511003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008058178,0.0002916491,0.004161054,0.0007404906,0.00004512045,0.0008836139,0.0118221,0.03365181,0.004988597,0.63717,0.3060008,0.0001642428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08053142,0.001070553,0.7260613,0.01260847,0.0002792862,0.0009153077,0.0002282768,0.002044115,0.1762613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4875101,0.001214867,0.4891725,0.001392549,0.0001538208,0.0004363395,0.0003773989,0.000211105,0.01953138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01477046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04941207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2229875127285962,"score_gpt":0.439772775315311,"score_spread":0.2167852625867148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}