{"id":"W121186114","doi":"","title":"Social sustainability: a review and critique of traditional versus emerging themes and assessment methods","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social sustainability; Sustainability; Sustainability organizations; Sustainability science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008858857,0.0005228675,0.002160305,0.0004894627,0.000674436,0.000288029,0.0009424425,0.0002965669,0.0002765726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002690744,0.000452959,0.0002671985,0.0007007995,0.01468278,0.001208947,0.001514759,0.0009979232,0.000003646271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001958749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002733134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001459296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007623812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937832,0.0005037308,0.001664211,0.001302675,0.0005147666,0.002231356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939149,0.0018853,0.0004903068,0.0004535174,0.0001697024,0.003086295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003480966,0.000405759,0.001785872,0.002983373,0.00006238627,0.000002158132,0.00004493629,0.000002402876,0.00002360742,0.8467561,0.00006216747,0.1478364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003719279,0.004336626,0.1002195,0.004250391,0.001363735,0.0001343369,0.003118596,0.002273536,0.000190583,0.6965674,0.1808969,0.002929144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.4623339,0.4994829,0.00002672091,0.01653884,0.0002695231,0.00337845,0.001315571,0.00002059221,0.01663352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08082055,0.9149126,0.003619471,0.0003661607,0.0001434346,0.00003196067,0.00002057584,0.00002562618,0.00005959666],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4154297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1287675585119327,"score_gpt":0.4981939476606674,"score_spread":0.3694263891487347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}