{"id":"W121344383","doi":"","title":"Integrating heuristic evaluation with cognitive walkthrough: development of a hybrid usability inspection method.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Persona Design and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Cognitive walkthrough; Heuristic evaluation; Software walkthrough; Computer science; Usability engineering; Usability inspection; Pluralistic walkthrough; Health informatics; USable; Human–computer interaction; Heuristic; Health care; Software; Software system; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001975851,0.00008174204,0.0001120463,0.00005521239,0.00008453184,0.00003953738,0.0001879625,0.00001466878,0.000001328201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004725292,0.00006585655,0.00001756975,0.000357834,0.00004503083,0.0002496052,0.00005083843,0.0000716299,0.000004789822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002021953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002637443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003339379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002878329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988081,0.0001664874,0.0002065547,0.0002730602,0.0003906776,0.0001551306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989983,0.0001343986,0.0001254677,0.0001831039,0.0004669114,0.00009182165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001970983,0.0001264788,0.0008670895,0.000009641753,0.00002292073,6.046807e-7,0.002988041,0.00003716132,0.00008786163,0.002260712,0.0000832393,0.9934965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003702545,0.0001933525,0.3926874,0.00009472852,0.0001491944,0.0001019215,0.003037421,0.4762275,0.09974257,0.02151983,0.001689827,0.0008536382],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1273582,0.00002669477,0.8693392,0.0001206707,0.00004354915,0.0007010808,0.000001908786,0.00008099752,0.002327657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7874862,2.652229e-7,0.2108831,0.00003066192,0.00001480484,0.001558933,0.000006040815,0.000003148808,0.00001680746],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2685552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.115809376194781,"score_gpt":0.3194674679229619,"score_spread":0.2036580917281809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}