{"id":"W122484647","doi":"","title":"Rationalizing Similar Facts: A Comment on R. v. Handy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Rationalization (economics); Convict; Law; Value (mathematics); Reasonable doubt; Jury; Character (mathematics); Criminal trial; Verdict; Federal Rules of Evidence; Admissible evidence; Psychology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02114239,0.00150129,0.002773548,0.002223868,0.02347179,0.01433217,0.0131614,0.1167234,0.007444852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04846876,0.002030579,0.004959395,0.002868999,0.03442789,0.008316719,0.004980504,0.07174836,0.002256254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04932663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0728922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8135911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8267978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9754607,0.00397907,0.001220354,0.005211233,0.007577484,0.006551069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698509,0.02048709,0.001230044,0.001433297,0.005508611,0.001490035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000166915,0.00004615538,0.0009518926,0.0001546824,0.0001009153,0.001434634,0.005723264,0.0006008013,0.0004964237,0.628302,0.3555835,0.00643873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005038735,0.00009465371,0.003243051,0.001167417,0.0003338585,0.00073344,0.00673986,0.001853857,0.001425225,0.2522079,0.7311575,0.0005392932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.008606831,0.005381617,0.00231964,0.9083719,0.005253581,0.0001697136,0.0004756494,0.0001914514,0.06922968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06252234,0.00201064,0.001687796,0.9069263,0.005376802,0.0001324297,0.000115532,0.00009622375,0.02113203],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8135911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3750133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03423243833765904,"score_gpt":0.3247244265968774,"score_spread":0.2904919882592184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}