{"id":"W1229193984","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-23141-4_9","title":"The Proactive and Reactive Digital Forensics Investigation Process: A Systematic Literature Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Communications in computer and information science","topic":"Digital and Cyber Forensics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Digital forensics; Process (computing); Computer science; Digital evidence; Computer forensics; Automation; Data science; Computer security; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05684477,0.001309443,0.005842758,0.02931041,0.00169145,0.005018599,0.002807415,0.002806103,0.002741081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1633137,0.001911035,0.00499502,0.01746038,0.003012292,0.008144592,0.004652676,0.001860369,0.0003379119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008084796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04339932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007280492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03559596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9516396,0.01975865,0.01840433,0.002610937,0.006799754,0.0007867691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7919319,0.1677482,0.0216707,0.002547384,0.01467635,0.001425405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002747878,0.00009923865,0.006615037,0.8060248,0.003068434,0.0004230757,0.005647911,0.0001558235,0.0003168778,0.001264555,0.002877536,0.1732318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001309199,0.0002735929,0.006427654,0.9455174,0.0143788,0.0009176459,0.007928444,0.0001143844,0.0003385157,0.0009296762,0.02296466,0.00007820581],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00663314,0.9886259,0.0009193394,0.0009204839,0.0001332173,0.001652179,0.0004891008,0.00001070098,0.0006159393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05684067,0.9291427,0.008262692,0.00162936,0.00008484088,0.003220466,0.0005636091,0.00001687976,0.0002387368],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9431552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3006275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02621813476351388,"score_gpt":0.248797007134284,"score_spread":0.2225788723707701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}