{"id":"W1233110544","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris revisited 30 years later.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Heart Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Grading (engineering); Angina; Coronary artery disease; Sass; MEDLINE; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Documentation; Cardiology; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004447384,0.00007918848,0.0002259592,0.00004438162,0.0001193127,0.00003222925,0.00006478486,0.0000528957,0.00001738221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000301348,0.00006340843,0.0004640647,0.0001868202,0.00007405728,0.00002380434,0.00001515652,0.0001354877,0.00001938258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001751583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002986856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008206193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003959046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990901,0.000029484,0.0001281664,0.0001335638,0.0002550741,0.0003636654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992146,0.00009569035,0.00002914595,0.0003753435,0.00006945907,0.0002157822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000863946,0.00004643025,0.3532523,0.0001481061,0.002141999,0.0002067843,0.001396754,0.00003208204,0.00001781996,0.0001938336,0.3248958,0.3176594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003822744,0.000005252105,0.7429757,0.00001659356,0.0002741109,0.00002476333,0.00003984432,0.00006081029,0.0001529283,0.00001130608,0.2559844,0.00007202761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8604686,0.07804302,0.00005026167,0.005785646,0.001631713,0.002273241,0.00009137479,0.0002236723,0.05143253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981926,0.000621726,0.0000478486,0.0002233281,0.0002745734,0.00008036696,0.000006391941,0.00001753663,0.0005356395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3897234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01865242198896633,"score_gpt":0.2064590219518172,"score_spread":0.1878065999628509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}