{"id":"W125599783","doi":"10.2172/944995","title":"Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) Report : Priest River, 2004-2005 Technical Report.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Warbler; Geography; Goose; Shrub; Ecology; Carex; Vegetation (pathology); Forestry; Grassland; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00653731,0.0008371227,0.0003859136,0.002393062,0.0009188745,0.001231596,0.001677092,0.0004109651,0.05056023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0135022,0.0007121592,0.0003755324,0.003041641,0.000296223,0.001522981,0.001010437,0.000792296,0.02631593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001633836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005805622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05704677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09243921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961384,0.0007224629,0.0003777218,0.0002408181,0.002322238,0.0001983765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880619,0.001243317,0.000801918,0.001264021,0.008346747,0.0002820799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002331359,0.0006815555,0.02937125,0.0002495046,0.00003343254,0.0001190465,0.0003763315,0.001254279,0.001323243,0.001737074,0.8255582,0.1390629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001587993,0.0003481486,0.1806725,0.0002760928,0.00005193365,0.0002038883,0.0009089268,0.002390378,0.005126079,0.001095018,0.8086978,0.00007050049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03620844,0.0004673343,0.04395334,0.001490346,0.0003427349,0.01567502,0.619214,0.00349974,0.279149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03386781,0.0007410833,0.1000109,0.0005957641,0.00007147134,0.01678419,0.6717231,0.001190965,0.1750146],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05704677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1691408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02494875298734429,"score_gpt":0.3014398607720501,"score_spread":0.2764911077847058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}