{"id":"W127319847","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2006.041","title":"Assessing the Disinfecting Power of Chlorite in Drinking Water","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Water Treatment and Disinfection","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Disinfectant; Chlorite; Bacillus subtilis; Spore; Chemistry; Microorganism; Sodium chlorite; Heterotroph; Microbiology; Bacteria; Environmental chemistry; Food science; Biology; Chlorine dioxide; Inorganic chemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00786873,0.0001090887,0.0001479507,0.0001235447,0.000573669,0.0004290343,0.0002184236,0.00005407609,0.001213462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004318368,0.00004873304,0.000108523,0.0001930073,0.0002588629,0.0008507093,0.0002618112,0.00054611,0.0001787421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002925174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000878583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003962354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004201129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969068,0.0008945533,0.0004686825,0.0001946974,0.0008637987,0.0006714404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995269,0.0001238481,0.00005585945,0.0001949996,0.0000378855,0.00006053588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001995084,0.000179072,0.8323213,0.000006276799,0.000009610454,0.00002409307,0.002726429,0.0005041694,0.1628699,0.0000468623,0.00009682515,0.001195503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005753962,0.00006908888,0.7211404,0.00004333556,0.000005643256,0.00005656171,0.0008343656,0.00005131251,0.26164,0.0143607,0.001096909,0.0001263003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884673,0.00001517647,0.0001439739,0.0009651419,0.0001134819,0.0001244218,2.907123e-7,0.00001022135,0.01015998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993247,0.000003684851,0.00006974117,0.00001453632,0.000114618,0.000004844772,0.00000456933,0.00001072826,0.0004525275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1111809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08619717687446529,"score_gpt":0.4051966952832581,"score_spread":0.3189995184087928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}