{"id":"W128960431","doi":"","title":"Towards Design and Architectural Evaluation of Product Variants: A Case Study on an Open Source Software System.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","topic":"Product Development and Customization","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Open source software; Computer science; Software engineering; Open source; Software; Product (mathematics); Architectural pattern; Software system; Systems engineering; Software construction; Engineering; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001694989,0.0003189847,0.0003372798,0.0004245063,0.0001451714,0.0002764249,0.0002122773,0.00005827993,0.000003621106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007438097,0.0003066061,0.00002272897,0.0004813364,0.00001094341,0.0007699456,0.0001470529,0.0001657934,0.000003285696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006922161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005269426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007304414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005011619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986073,0.00003425398,0.0003265847,0.0004842113,0.0002653031,0.0002823068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992654,0.00006054646,0.00009720951,0.0002865702,0.0002487748,0.00004149081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001458661,0.0006612517,0.003843554,0.001642087,0.0002318451,0.0001563295,0.007825009,0.6183015,0.001363407,0.001192942,0.0001027625,0.3645335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003032987,0.0003435988,0.0363148,0.0007988261,0.0004220403,0.0004758188,0.00163096,0.9549426,0.0004578378,0.00007416808,0.0003825992,0.001123784],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8522313,0.0004631671,0.1449578,0.00001618675,0.0003680339,0.001311918,0.00000122443,0.0005969692,0.00005339203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867831,0.000001413704,0.01263694,0.00001053176,0.0004138476,0.00007126025,0.00001231529,0.00005204069,0.000018513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3634097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0268809938003808,"score_gpt":0.2526994893214886,"score_spread":0.2258184955211078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}