{"id":"W130210185","doi":"10.1023/a:1024062803820","title":"Incorporating Natural Capital into Economy-Wide Impact Analysis: A Case Study from Alberta","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Economic impact analysis; Environmental impact assessment; Sustainability; Foothills; Economics; Natural resource economics; Economic model; Natural capital; Impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Macroeconomics; Ecology; Ecosystem services","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003011032,0.0004574257,0.0003912518,0.0001161557,0.0005695636,0.0001632757,0.0001743413,0.00007697931,0.0009199253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001559177,0.0004224815,0.0001545161,0.0002657783,0.0001938529,0.0005895302,0.0003995782,0.0003319964,0.00009870498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001592452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000194722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02495772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004996659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977091,0.0001807486,0.0004433458,0.0008055179,0.0003459054,0.0005154083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989361,0.0001604584,0.0001822305,0.0004009602,0.000001191809,0.0003190255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007691909,0.0004002497,0.9910321,0.00000244672,0.0004476636,0.0005794751,0.003086716,0.001264787,0.0007357449,0.00000612255,0.00001648104,0.002420529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008985251,0.0002032226,0.9536911,0.000005658656,0.0003253922,0.00009441895,0.0423491,0.0005422274,0.0005989988,0.0004152626,0.0002893754,0.0005866888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969248,0.0001406639,0.00005275238,0.00003329942,0.0001782095,0.0004345265,0.000005620686,0.00003004854,0.002200126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996612,0.00001829806,0.002580009,0.00003437025,0.0000744104,0.00009758142,0.00003227333,0.00003652701,0.0005145777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03926239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00649387383624748,"score_gpt":0.2625121142096278,"score_spread":0.2560182403733803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}