{"id":"W130561418","doi":"10.2478/s13382-014-0303-7","title":"Work stress and the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease events: A systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health","topic":"Workplace Health and Well-being","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Medicine; Hazard ratio; Confidence interval; Relative risk; Myocardial infarction; Prospective cohort study; Systematic review; Epidemiology; Random effects model; Internal medicine; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01124386,0.002679991,0.01581302,0.007176719,0.0006894417,0.0029974,0.00201467,0.002335047,0.003487424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02842734,0.001623083,0.0370257,0.007287681,0.0005790722,0.001580485,0.001523742,0.001851603,0.0002915935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002537199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004468043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007085869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01457889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929067,0.003125283,0.002131179,0.0007162845,0.0008455568,0.0002749927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836233,0.01186357,0.002479766,0.0004581321,0.001345839,0.0002294076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001354302,0.00004706045,0.004528018,0.4609015,0.5192305,0.0001687819,0.0001078627,0.000540584,0.0001839055,0.0001243378,0.0005296181,0.01228363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004029694,0.0002046434,0.004280389,0.03280999,0.960294,0.0001186719,0.00005511848,0.000207449,0.00009526045,0.000162779,0.001342626,0.00002618506],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003853271,0.9946555,0.0004596898,0.0001614978,0.0001232131,0.0002602586,0.0003185523,0.00001747499,0.0001505853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1044118,0.8907047,0.002135568,0.0005761299,0.0002360635,0.001067696,0.0006127291,0.00001889026,0.0002364048],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01581302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05946386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09086960388160868,"score_gpt":0.4654894596176929,"score_spread":0.3746198557360843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}