{"id":"W130561418","doi":"10.2478/s13382-014-0303-7","title":"Work stress and the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease events: A systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health","topic":"Workplace Health and Well-being","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Medicine; Hazard ratio; Confidence interval; Relative risk; Myocardial infarction; Prospective cohort study; Systematic review; Epidemiology; Random effects model; Internal medicine; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004488563,0.0003420272,0.004755629,0.0003413205,0.0002990223,0.000005567023,0.0002580296,0.000104428,0.0003082321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006294841,0.0001711523,0.000643659,0.0001795847,0.0002974885,0.00008860953,0.0001480874,0.0008430442,0.00000494953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002175603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003364416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007552307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001136903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920529,0.003391941,0.003060559,0.0002711876,0.0009865038,0.0002368994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907456,0.003756424,0.004699772,0.0002333912,0.00009578695,0.0004690459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000855407,0.000220551,0.01512377,0.9108404,0.05927553,0.00001205091,0.001016182,0.000007114602,2.367186e-9,0.0005520582,0.003498382,0.008598545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002585674,0.0004251924,0.01696493,0.3192448,0.611905,0.0001285037,0.000568459,0.00002891102,2.515868e-9,0.0005611012,0.04725303,0.0003343332],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009346809,0.989059,0.0001069727,0.008050853,0.0002609332,0.001944769,0.0004704694,0.000002653748,0.00001086895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003741396,0.9900371,0.00008975184,0.005390896,0.0002549505,0.0001482992,0.0002189922,0.00001942488,0.00009920686],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5915956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6979387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09086960388160868,"score_gpt":0.4654894596176929,"score_spread":0.3746198557360843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}