{"id":"W131687738","doi":"","title":"Beyond the “Historical” Simulation: Using Theories of History to Inform Scholarly Game Design.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loading...","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Narrative; Rhetoric; Strict constructionism; Mode (computer interface); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Narrative history; History of technology; Social constructionism; Sociology; Constructionism; Historical thinking; History; Computer science; Literature; Archaeology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01042934,0.0008800053,0.0004279489,0.002763761,0.002440902,0.009001565,0.002842227,0.001892344,0.008687994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03837863,0.0006149884,0.0006840742,0.001460937,0.01494048,0.01356695,0.004619248,0.002094043,0.0007089197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003881207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003188475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001990665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003203579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931461,0.005921464,0.0001473657,0.0003241169,0.0003193379,0.0001416245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697471,0.02599186,0.00106486,0.001851986,0.0007156762,0.0006285911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007644954,0.0001246736,0.002041856,0.0003671307,0.00004517299,0.0001107087,0.02164267,0.01233653,0.0002717132,0.9124944,0.001970577,0.04851806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004161302,0.0001369942,0.0005143462,0.0005116764,0.00003839231,0.00009455183,0.01211517,0.03366001,0.0006719708,0.8847493,0.06743319,0.00003291472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07694253,0.0039711,0.6847226,0.01444353,0.0005158203,0.0006493369,0.0002137197,0.0004797595,0.2180616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8302761,0.001632632,0.1566428,0.0007354185,0.00006208744,0.0007931514,0.0001424464,0.0001480535,0.009567206],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01042934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05515629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07685738106908278,"score_gpt":0.3153077890682563,"score_spread":0.2384504079991736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}