{"id":"W132217938","doi":"10.1038/nbt0901-811b","title":"In defense of the precautionary principle","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nature Biotechnology","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ocean Networks Canada Society; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Biology; Biotechnology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00889249,0.001269877,0.002217392,0.001047739,0.008959929,0.01091126,0.004282911,0.1625456,0.007113604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04120917,0.001331706,0.002070576,0.001177912,0.007938595,0.006207563,0.003551296,0.1218095,0.006409528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007475234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008117354,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01855867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03821081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920889,0.001897932,0.0008360948,0.001239848,0.002336109,0.001601055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795039,0.01440954,0.001132954,0.0005418749,0.002599162,0.001812487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001429086,0.00009087552,0.001167829,0.00009752905,0.0000550995,0.001480924,0.0008750789,0.000208061,0.0003150586,0.03799402,0.9484275,0.009145075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002139598,0.0001002539,0.002552112,0.0004194324,0.00009384206,0.0008219284,0.001299804,0.001289205,0.0005593679,0.07219551,0.9203201,0.0001345481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004772696,0.0005277112,0.0002038672,0.9880486,0.006595599,0.00001228724,0.00003999221,0.00001172821,0.004082786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002570109,0.000182439,0.000221839,0.9818526,0.008040447,0.00003582605,0.00001237017,0.000009036121,0.007075344],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1625456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05423683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01200992368222131,"score_gpt":0.3110115229748719,"score_spread":0.2990015992926506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}